Efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin 320 mg once-daily for 7 days in the treatment of adult lower respiratory tract infections

Efficacy and safety of oral gemifloxacin for the empirical treatment of pneumonia

CONTEXT

Respiratory tract infections (RTI) are common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Initial antibiotic therapy in upper and lower respiratory tract infections is usually empirical. The increasing evidence of antibacterial resistance in the pathogens commonly associated with pneumonia has raised concerns about the efficacy of currently available therapies and poses a challenge to clinicians. Gemifloxacin is a synthetic fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent exhibiting potent activity against most Gram negative and Gram positive organisms. Hence, this study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of gemifloxacin as an empirical therapy in pneumonia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an open labelled, single-arm study. Patients with clinical features of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria received treatment with oral gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 5-7 days. Once enrolled in the study, patients were treated as outpatient or as inpatient depending on clinical need. The primary efficacy was to evaluate the clinical response at the end of therapy, i.e., day 9-11 for CAP. Secondary efficacy parameters included radiological and bacteriological response at the end of therapy. Patients were evaluated three times during the entire course of treatment (Visit 1, Day 0; Visit 2, Day 2-4; Visit 3, Day 9-11) for their clinical, radiological and/or bacteriological response, as well as for safety assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients received the study medication (gemifloxacin 320 mg orally). Two patients were "lost to follow-up" and one patient had to discontinue medication due to insufficient therapeutic effects. Clinical response at the end of therapy was successful in 99 (96.1%) while clinical failure was reported in 4 (3.9%) patient. As per the radiological response, 77.1% of the total cases showed improvement, 8.6% had no change, and 2.9% cases had deterioration in radiological findings. Gemifloxacin is an effective drug in the management of CAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemifloxacin with coverage against both Gram positive and Gram negative organisms as well as atypical pathogens, with once daily oral dosing and minimum side effect is a very effective and economical choice for treating CAP empirically.

Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in adolescents and adults

Dengue fever (DF) is endemic in tropical and subtropical zones and the prevalence is increasing across South-east Asia, Africa, the Western Pacific and the Americas. In recent years, the spread of unplanned urbanisation, with associated substandard housing, overcrowding and deterioration in water, sewage and waste management systems, has created ideal conditions for increased transmission of the dengue virus in tropical urban centres. While dengue infection has traditionally been considered a paediatric disease, the age distribution of dengue has been rising and more cases have been observed in adolescents and adults. Furthermore, the development of tourism in the tropics has led to an increase in the number of tourists who become infected, most of whom are adults. Symptoms and risk factors for dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and severe dengue differ between children and adults, with co-morbidities and incidence in more elderly patients associated with greater risk of mortality. Treatment options for DF and DHF in adults, as for children, centre round fluid replacement (either orally or intravenously, depending on severity) and antipyretics. Further data are needed on the optimal treatment of adult patients.

Fluoroquinolones in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in primary care

A literature search was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of the respiratory fluoroquinolones (gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) and their efficacy and safety in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Data show that CAP is a common presentation in primary care practice, and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the elderly. Although the causative pathogens differ depending on treatment setting and patient factors, Streptococcus pneumoniae is the primary pathogen in all treatment settings. As a class, the respiratory fluoroquinolones have a very favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Pharmacodynamic criteria suggest that moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin are more potent against S. pneumoniae, which may have the added benefit of reducing resistance selection and enhancing bacterial eradication. The respiratory fluoroquinolones are also generally well tolerated, and are first-line options for outpatient treatment of CAP in patients with comorbidities or previous antibiotic use.

Safety considerations of fluoroquinolones in the elderly: an update

The fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin are widely used for the treatment of various types of bacterial infections. Overall, these antibacterial agents can be considered safe and well tolerated drugs. Comparative studies have evaluated the use of quinolones in elderly and younger populations. Although age per se does not seem to decrease their tolerability, specific adverse effects of the quinolones must be considered when they are chosen for antibacterial treatment. Renal function declines consistently with age and doses of renally excreted quinolones (e.g. ofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin) need to be adjusted if a clinically relevant reduction of creatinine clearance is identified. Reactions of the gastrointestinal tract, such as nausea, dyspepsia, vomiting or diarrhoea, are among the most often registered adverse drug reactions during therapy with fluoroquinolones. Treatment with a quinolone causes diarrhoea less frequently than treatment with other classes of antimicrobials. Conflicting data have been published with respect to the incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in quinolone-treated patients. Hypersensitivity reactions, often manifested on the skin, occur less commonly during therapy with quinolones than, for example, during therapy with beta-lactam antibacterials. Adverse reactions of the CNS are of particular concern in the elderly population. Given the CNS excitatory effects of quinolones, elderly patients should be monitored carefully for such symptoms. It is likely that many signs of possible adverse reactions, such as confusion, weakness, loss of appetite, tremor or depression, are often mistakenly attributed to old age and remain unreported. Quinolones should be used with caution in patients with known or suspected CNS disorders that predispose to seizures (e.g. severe cerebral arteriosclerosis or epilepsy). Quinolones can cause QT interval prolongation. They should be avoided in patients with known prolongation of the QT interval, patients with uncorrected hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia and patients receiving class IA (e.g. quinidine, procainamide) or class III (e.g. amiodarone, sotalol) antiarrhythmic agents. Tendinitis and tendon ruptures are recognized as quinolone-induced adverse effects that can occur during treatment or as late as several months after treatment. Chronic renal diseases, concomitant use of corticosteroids and age >60 years are known risk factors for quinolone-induced tendopathies. Overall, the specific adverse-effect profile of quinolones must be considered when they are chosen for treatment of bacterial infections. Because of physiological changes in renal function and when certain co-morbidities are present, some special considerations are necessary when elderly patients are treated with these drugs.

Gemifloxacin use in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

The newest generation of fluoroquinolones have proven efficacy against bacterial organisms associated with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Gemifloxacin, as one of the quinolones in this class, exhibits many of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the class with a few notable differences. Against Streptococccus pneumoniae it has a lower minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) than the other respiratory fluoroquinolones and it has activity against both bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. The increased activity of gemifloxacin against both enzymes may be associated with decreased rates of resistance. Clinically, gemifloxacin has been shown to have positive effects on length of hospitalization and increased success at long-term follow-up in AECB patients. These associations were observed in noninferiority comparison studies. Although an advantage with the use of gemifloxacin in AECB is suggested, there are no comparison data is available to conclude that gemifloxacin is superior to the other respiratory fluoroquinolones. Gemifloxacin is generally well tolerated, but is associated with a characteristic rash and gastrointestinal upset as its most common observed side effects.

Gemifloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Newer fluoroquinolones have become an important therapeutic choice in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Gemifloxacin is one of the newest members of this class of antibiotics and has performed favourably in this indication.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the microbiological activity, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and clinical activity of gemifloxacin in CAP, as well as the safety reported in controlled clinical studies.

METHODS

Literature research of English publications in the last 10 years addressing all aspects of gemifloxacin in CAP.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Gemifloxacin is microbiologically the most active fluoroquinolone against Streptococcus pneumoniae--the leading pathogen of CAP. In several comparative studies gemifloxacin was highly effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild-to-moderate severe CAP.

Role of gemifloxacin in the management of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) form a substantial clinical and financial burden, with the increasing complication of antimicrobial resistance. This resistance may compromise the use of many empirically prescribed antimicrobials. The new respiratory fluoroquinolones have been developed to overcome this burgeoning resistance. This group includes gemifloxacin, an enhanced-affinity fluoroquinolone that has been approved for clinical use in several countries and is characterised as a potent dual-acting agent with excellent in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of strains (MIC90)=0.03-0.06 microg/mL). Gemifloxacin given once daily for 5-7 days has been shown to be non-inferior to, or in some instances superior to, comparator agents for the treatment of common lower RTIs. Moreover, it is generally well tolerated and is as safe as many frequently empirically prescribed antimicrobials. In addition, studies have shown gemifloxacin to be a cost-effective agent for some lower RTIs.

The safety profile of moxifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in special patient populations

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, represent a major advance in the development of antimicrobial agents. They offer significant activity against Gram-negative pathogens, while more advanced generation fluoroquinolones including levofloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin are significantly active against Gram-positive (e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae for some members of the class), typical, atypical, and anaerobic pathogens. Fluoroquinolones have a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile that exhibits concentration-dependent killing and good oral absorption, allowing for once-daily dosing.

OBJECTIVE

Review of data from fluoroquinolone studies, with an emphasis on the associated rare, but potentially clinically important, adverse events in specific patient populations. Review of clinical efficacy is included where relevant to the topic under discussion.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using terms including fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, safety, adverse events, drug interactions, and pharmacokinetic parameters to identify literature providing information regarding the safety profile of specified fluoroquinolones in special patient populations (i.e., the elderly, patients with liver disease, kidney disease, glycemic disorder, those at risk for cardiovascular events). Although specific date criteria were not applied to the search, preference was given to more recent publications. Online databases searched include MEDLINE and EMBASE and relevant textbooks were utilized as well.

FINDINGS

Fluoroquinolones, when used either as monotherapy or as combination therapy depending on their individual indications, attain adequate concentrations for treating infections in different target sites, including epithelial lining fluid, alveolar macrophages, skin, and gastrointestinal tissues. Overall, fluoroquinolones have predictable and mild-to-moderate adverse-event profiles and are generally well tolerated. Findings of this review are limited by the availability of publications and case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroquinolones, are associated with rare, but clinically important, adverse events in special patient populations (including the elderly; those with hepatic, renal, or glycemic disorders; and those at risk for cardiovascular events). Recognition of differences in the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of fluoroquinolones in special patient populations should lead to better antimicrobial agent selection.

Gemifloxacin for the treatment of respiratory tract infections: in vitro susceptibility, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and safety

Gemifloxacin is a synthetic fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent exhibiting potent activity against most gram-negative and gram-positive organisms, such as the important community-acquired respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae (including multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae), Haemophilus influenzae , and Moraxella catarrhalis . The agent's mechanism of action involves dual targeting of two essential bacterial enzymes: DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. Gemifloxacin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2003 for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. The drug has an oral bioavailability of approximately 71%. Approximately 20-35% of gemifloxacin is excreted unchanged in the urine after 24 hours. The elimination half-life of gemifloxacin is 6-8 hours in patients with normal renal function, supporting once-daily dosing. The 24-hour free-drug area under the plasma concentration-time curve:minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (fAUC(0-24):MIC) associated with efficacy, based on results from in vitro and animal models of infection, is approximately 30. With a mean fAUC(0-24) of approximately 3 microg*hour/ml (35% of total AUC(0-24) of 8.4) and a median S. pneumoniae MIC for 90% of tested strains of 0.03, a fAUC(0-24):MIC ratio of 100 would be expected after standard dosing (320 mg once/day). In clinical studies involving both hospitalized and outpatient populations, gemifloxacin has been highly effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Clinical success rates ranged from 93.9-95.9% in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and 96.1-97.5% in those with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Gemifloxacin is well tolerated; the frequency of adverse events with this agent is low. Most adverse events are mild-to-moderate in severity, with diarrhea (< 4%), nausea and rash (< 3%), and headache (< 2%) most commonly reported. Drug interactions with gemifloxacin are not common, although absorption is greatly reduced when given with divalent and trivalent cation-containing compounds, such as antacids. Due to its potent activity against many common gram-positive and gram-negative respiratory pathogens, its proven clinical efficacy, and its favorable safety profile, gemifloxacin is a highly effective empiric treatment for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

Guide to selection of fluoroquinolones in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin have several attributes that make them excellent choices for the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections. In particular, they have excellent intrinsic activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens. Fluoroquinolones may be used as monotherapy to treat high-risk patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and for patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, but not admission to intensive care. Overall, the newer fluoroquinolones often achieve clinical cure rates in > or =90% of these patients. However, rates may be lower in hospital-acquired pneumonia, and this infection should be treated on the basis of anticipated organisms and evaluation of risk factors for specific pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this setting, an antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone may be used in combination with an antipseudomonalbeta-lactam. Concerns are now being raised about the widespread use, and possibly misuse, of fluoroquinolones and the emergence of resistance among S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. A number of pharmacokinetic parameters such as the peak concentration of the antibacterial after a dose (C(max)), and the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) and their relationship to pharmacodynamic parameters such as the minimum inhibitory and the mutant prevention concentrations (MIC and MPC, respectively) have been proposed to predict the effect of fluoroquinolones on bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance. Higher C(max)/MIC or AUC24/MIC and C(max)/MPC or AUC24/MPC ratios, either as a result of dose administration or the susceptibility of the organism, may lead to a better clinical outcome and decrease the emergence of resistance, respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles that are optimised to target low-level resistant minor subpopulations of bacteria that often exist in infections may help preserve fluoroquinolones as a class. To this end, optimising the AUC24/MPC or C(max)/MPC ratios is important, particularly against S. pneumoniae, in the setting of lower respiratory tract infections. Agents such as moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin with high ratios against this organism are preferred, and agents such as ciprofloxacin with low ratios should be avoided. For agents such as levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, with intermediate ratios against S. pneumoniae, it may be worthwhile considering alternative dose administration strategies, such as using higher dosages, to eradicate low-level resistant variants. This must, of course, be balanced against the potential of toxicity. Innovative approaches to the use of fluoroquinolones are worth testing in further in vitro experiments as well as in clinical trials.

Gemifloxacin: a new, potent fluoroquinolone for the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections

The fluoroquinolone gemifloxacin has recently been approved for the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and mild community acquired pneumonia, including that caused by multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Owing to the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae, as well as resistance to other common pathogens of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and community acquired pneumonia, it is important to have new, potent antimicrobial agents for the treatment of these infections. Gemifloxacin is the most potent antimicrobial agent in vitro for S. pneumoniae, and has excellent activity against the other key pathogens of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and community acquired pneumonia, including the atypical microorganisms. The clinical trial outcomes of several studies that have evaluated gemifloxacin show a range of superior clinical or bacteriologic outcomes against several current antimicrobials, including levofloxacin, clarithromycin, trovafloxacin and ceftriaxone. The safety profile of gemifloxacin is similar to that of approved agents to treat acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and community acquired pneumonia, with a low discontinuation rate of 2.2%. A nonphototoxic rash (usually a mild, maculopapular rash) was observed in 2.8% of patients in clinical studies.

Gemifloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone

Gemifloxacin is a dual targeted fluoroquinolone with potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive, -negative and atypical human pathogens--pathogens considered to be important causes of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Gemifloxacin demonstrates impressive minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC 90 ) values against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella spp., with MIC 90 values reported to be 0.016-0.06, < 0.0008-0.06, 0.008-0.3, 0.25, 0.125 and 0.016-0.07 microg/ml, respectively. Gemifloxacin is also active in vitro against a broad range of Gram-negative bacilli with MIC 90 values against the Enterobacteriaceae in the range of 0.016 to > 16 microg/ml ( Escherichia coli and Providencia stuartii, respectively), with the majority of the genus having MIC 90 drug concentrations < 0.5 microg/ml. The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against anaerobic organisms is variable. The MIC values for gemifloxacin are not affected by beta-lactamase production nor by penicillin or macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae. Gemifloxacin is approved by the FDA to be clinically efficacious against multi-drug resistant S. pneumoniae. The pharmacokinetics of gemifloxacin are such that the drug can be administered orally once-daily to yield or achieve sustainable drug concentrations exceeding the MIC values of clinically important organisms. Gemifloxacin has been shown to target both DNA gyrase (preferred target) and topoisomerase IV (secondary target) - enzymes critical for DNA replication and organism survival - against clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae. This dual targeting activity is thought to be important for reducing the likelihood for selecting for quinolone resistance. Gemifloxacin has been investigated and approved for therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. In one study, more patients receiving gemifloxacin compared to clarithromycin remained free of exacerbations for longer periods of time (p < 0.016) and gemifloxacin had a shorter time to eradication of H. influenzae than did clarithromycin (p < 0.02). From efficacy studies, gemifloxacin was found to have an adverse profile that was comparable with other compounds. The most frequent side effects were diarrhoea, abdominal pain and headache. Gemifloxacin is a welcomed addition to currently available agents for the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Other potential indications appear to be within the spectrum of this compound.

Antimicrobial selection for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections in the 21st century: a review of gemifloxacin

Community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are more prevalent in the elderly than in children and younger adults and form a significant proportion of all consultations and hospital admissions in this older age group. Furthermore, in a world of increasing life expectancy the trend seems unlikely to be reversed. Antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) must cover Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, and in many circumstances should also cover the intracellular (atypical) pathogens. In contrast, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) are mainly associated with H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae and not with atypical bacteria: in severe cases, other Gram-negative bacteria may be involved. Frequently in LRTIs, the aetiology of the infection cannot be identified from the laboratory specimens and treatment has to be empirical. In such situations it is important to not only to use an antibiotic that covers all likely organisms, but also one that has good activity against these organisms given the local resistance patterns. Gemifloxacin is a new quinolone antibiotic that targets pneumococcal DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV and is highly active against S. pneumoniae including penicillin-, macrolide- and many ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, as well as H. influenzae and the atypical pathogens. In clinical trials in CAP and AECB, gemifloxacin has been shown to be as effective a range of comparators and demonstrated an adverse event profile that was in line with the comparator agents. In one long-term study in AECB significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin than clarithromycin remained free of recurrence after 26 weeks. The improved potency, broad spectrum of activity and proven clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety profile should make it a useful agent in the 21st century battle against community-acquired LRTIs.

Gemifloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone approved for treatment of respiratory infections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the microbiology, pharmacokinetic parameters, drug interactions, and results of the available clinical trials of gemifloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1966-September 2003) was searched for primary and review articles. Data from the manufacturer were also included. Key words included adverse effects, clinical trials, drug interactions, gemifloxacin, and pharmacokinetic parameters.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles and product labeling concerning gemifloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of CAP and AECB, were included for review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Compared with currently available fluoroquinolones, gemifloxacin demonstrated improved in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% eradication 0.03 microg/mL) and similar activity against gram-negative respiratory pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis) and atypical pathogens such as Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Gemifloxacin, consistent with other available fluoroquinolones, has insufficient activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to allow clinical use for such infections. Gemifloxacin has adequate bioavailability and a favorable drug interaction profile. Gemifloxacin was comparable to commonly employed nonfluoroquinolone regimens for treatment of CAP and AECB, although the studies were designed to demonstrate equivalence. Gemifloxacin once daily for 5-7 days was well tolerated in controlled and uncontrolled clinical studies. Available clinical data, however, are insufficient to draw clinical or toxicologic distinctions between gemifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemifloxacin may be a suitable choice for empiric treatment of CAP or AECB. However, due to the significant history of fluoroquinolone-induced hepatic failure and dermatologic complications, the use of this drug should be closely monitored.

Gemifloxacin Mesylate

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive five to six well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late Phase III trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent to you in print and CD ROM forms and are available online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of your facility. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The September 2003 monograph topics are tositumomab, omalizumab, emtricitabine, testosterone buccal system mucoadhesive, and alfuzosin. The DUE is on omalizumab.

Oral gemifloxacin once daily for 5 days compared with sequential therapy with i.v. ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime (maximum of 10 days) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

In a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicentre study, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral gemifloxacin (320 mg once daily, 5 days) was compared with sequential intravenous (i.v.) ceftriaxone (1 g once daily, maximum 3 days) followed by oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily, maximum 7 days) in adult hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) (n = 274). The clinical success rates at follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy) in the clinical per-protocol population (the primary endpoint) were 86.8% (105/121) for gemifloxacin vs. 81.3% (91/112) for ceftriaxone/cefuroxime (treatment difference = 5.5,95% CI -3.9,14.9). The corresponding clinical results in the clinical intention-to-treat (ITT) population were 82.6% (114/138) vs. 72.1% (98/136), respectively (treatment difference = 10.5,95% CI 0.7, 20.4).Thus, gemifloxacin had significantly higher clinical success rates than ceftriaxone/cefuroxime. The median time to discharge was 9 days in the gemifloxacin group vs. 11 days in the ceftriaxone/cefuroxime group (P = 0.04, Wilcoxon test). At follow-up, 120/138 (87.0%) gemifloxacin-treated patients had been discharged from hospital, compared with 111/136 (81.6%) ceftriaxone/cefuroxime-treated patients in the clinical ITT population. Both treatments were generally well tolerated and there was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the incidence or type of adverse events reported. A 5-day course of oral gemifloxacin was shown by this study to be at least equivalent to sequential i.v. ceftriaxone/cefuroxime axetil (for up to 10 days) in patients with AECB who require hospital treatment.

Oral gemifloxacin versus sequential therapy with intravenous ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime with or without a macrolide in the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of clinical efficacy and tolerability

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral gemifloxacin, an enhanced-affinity quinolone, with sequential therapy with IV ceftriaxone followed by oral cefuroxime (with or without a macrolide) in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, multicenter study comprised adults hospitalized with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of CAP. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either (1) oral gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily (7-14 days); or (2) IV ceftriaxone 2 g once daily (1-7 days) followed by oral cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily (1-13 days) for a total of < or = 14 days. Patients receiving ceftriaxone/cefuroxime were allowed concomitant macrolide treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 345 patients were randomized, of whom 341 received at least 1 dose of study medication (gemifloxacin, 169/172; ceftriaxone/cefuroxime, 172/173). Clinical success rates in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at follow-up (day 21-28 post-therapy), the primary end point, were 92.2% (107/116) for gemifloxacin and 93.4% (113/121) for ceftriaxone/cefuroxime (treatment difference, -1.15; 95% CI, -7.73 to 5.43). In patients in Fine risk classes IV and V, the clinical success rate was 87.0% (20/23) for gemifloxacin versus 83.3% (20/24) for ceftriaxone/cefuroxime. No difference in clinical response at follow-up was noted based on macrolide use. Bacteriologic success rates at follow-up in the bacteriologically evaluable (BE) population were 90.6% (58/64) for gemifloxacin and 87.3% (55/63) for ceftriaxone/cefuroxime (treatment difference 3.32; 95% CI, -7.57 to 14.21). The clinical success rate in bacteremic patients at follow-up (BE population) was 100.0%. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. The frequency and types of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. The most common treatment-related adverse events with gemifloxacin were diarrhea, liver-function adverse events, and rash; with ceftriaxone/cefuroxime, they were diarrhea, elevated hepatic-enzyme activity, and moniliasis.

CONCLUSION

The clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily were similar to those of IV ceftriaxone followed by oral cefuroxime (with or without a macrolide) in the treatment of adult patients hospitalized with moderate to severe CAP. Both treatments were effective in bacteremic patients and those at increased risk of mortality.

A comparison of gemifloxacin and clarithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and long-term clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Gemifloxacin is an enhanced-affinity quinolone with potent activity against lower respiratory tract pathogens.

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of a 5-day course of gemifloxacin were compared with those of a standard 7-day regimen of clarithromycin in patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The impact of treatment on the long-term (26 weeks) clinical outcome was also assessed.

METHODS

The acute phase of this randomized, double-blind study was performed in 93 centers in 7 countries. Adult patients (age >40 years) with a history of chronic bronchitis and an Anthonisen type 1 acute exacerbation (increased dyspnea, cough, and sputum purulence) were eligible. Patients receiving systemic steroids at a dose of >10 mg prednisone or the equivalent were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 5 days or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days. Clinical and bacteriologic response rates were assessed at the end-of-therapy visit (days 8-12), the week 2-3 follow-up visit (days 13-24), and the week 4-5 follow-up visit (days 25-38). The long-term phase (26 weeks), which included US and Canadian participants only, evaluated the proportion of patients who remained free of a recurrence of AECB requiring additional antimicrobial therapy after resolution of the initial episode.

RESULTS

Seven hundred twelve patients were randomized to treatment, 351 to gemifloxacin and 361 to clarithromycin. The long-term study included 438 patients, 214 receiving gemifloxacin and 224 receiving clarithromycin. Clinical success rates at the 2-3 week follow-up visit were 85.4% for gemifloxacin and 84.6% for clarithromycin. Bacteriologic success rates were 86.7% for gemifloxacin and 73.1% for clarithromycin. Significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin than clarithromycin remained free of AECB recurrences (71.0% vs 58.5%, respectively; P = 0.016). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In the acute treatment of Anthonisen type 1 AECB, a 5-day course of gemifloxacin was at least as effective as a 7-day regimen of clarithromycin. In this population, significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin remained free of AECB recurrence after 26 weeks compared with those receiving clarithromycin.