Pure small cell carcinoma of the prostate

UK single centre experience of rare and atypical variant of castrate-resistant prostate cancer: Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine small-cell carcinoma

Background:

We report on the emergence of a rare and atypical variant of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) that is characterised by transformation into poorly differentiated neuroendocrine small-cell carcinoma (NSCC). The existence of this variant was previously described in isolated case reports and small case-studies, but as yet there has been no UK series reported in the literature.

Methods:

Between January 2010 and January 2014, eight cases were presented in our local multi-disciplinary team meeting having a diagnosis of NSCC arising on a background of prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy. We performed a retrospective review of the clinical records of these patients, to identify the mode of presentation, diagnostic investigations, pathological characteristics, and subsequent treatment and survival outcomes.

Results:

The median patient age was 77 years (range, 68 – 84), with a median time interval of 25 months (range, 7 – 83) between the original diagnosis and subsequent transformation to NSCC. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 4 ng/ml, at presentation. Most patients presented with local progression, combined with high-volume and atypical sites of metastasis (e.g. brain, pancreas and penis). Patients developed a good initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy, but responses were short-lived and prognosis poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of 8 months.

Conclusion:

Prostate NSCC represents an atypical variant of CRPC with significant therapeutic and prognostic implications. Based on our observations, we have proposed a clinical algorithm for early diagnosis and appropriate management of these patients.

Pure small cell carcinoma of the prostate: A rare tumor

Pure small cell carcinoma of the prostate is a rare and aggressive neoplasm, with only few cases described in literature and poor prognosis: mean survival is 5 months. We report the case of a patient with this disease, with special attention to the evolution of neuroendocrine markers as Chromogranine A and neuron-specific enolase during the progression of the tumor, evaluating their possible role in staging and follow up.

Survival of patients with small cell carcinoma of the prostate during 1973-2003: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the survival of patients with primary small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the prostate and assess prognostic factors based on a large population sample.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 241 cases of SCC of the prostate were reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries from 1973 to 2003 of which 191 cases were included in our study. We used the Kaplan-Meier method for estimating survival, and Cox proportional hazard regression modelling to evaluate prognostic variables.

RESULTS

The overall age-adjusted incidence rate was 0.278 per 1,000,000 (95% confidence interval, 0.239-0.323). In all, 60.5% presented as metastatic disease compared with 39.5% who presented as local/regional disease (P= 0.012). The 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months observed survival rates were 47.9%, 27.5%, 19%, 17% and 14.3% respectively. On univariate analyses, age <60, concomitant low-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma, absence of metastasis, prostatectomy and radiation therapy were favourable prognostic factors. In multivariate regression modelling, age, pathology and stage were strong predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the SEER database, we present the largest study describing the epidemiology of primary SCC of the prostate. We found age, concomitant low-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma, and stage of the disease to be the strongest predictors of survival for patients with prostatic SCC. Future studies evaluating a broader range of clinical and molecular markers are needed to refine the prognostic model of this relatively rare disease.

Unusual and Underappreciated: Small Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate

In recent years, attention has focused on the prognostic importance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer. Focal neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic adenocarcinoma is a frequent finding. Though controversial, the prevalence of neuroendocrine cells has been correlated with higher-grade malignancy and poor prognosis. As with other small cell tumors, production of ectopic neuropeptides has been reported. The rarity of the disease has precluded prospective randomized trials. Therapeutic regimens have mainly been modeled after those for small cell lung carcinoma. Here we review the literature to identify potential diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic factors. Evident from this review is the necessity for further research in the biology of small cell carcinoma progression, in order to improve therapy.

Pure primary neuroendocrine tumor of the prostate: a rare entity

An extrapulmonary neuroendocrine tumor arising in the prostate gland has been described in several case series; however, pure and primary prostatic neuroendocrine tumors are very rare, their biologic behavior is not yet well known, and there are only a few reports in the literature describing the clinical features and management of this neoplasm. This article presents the clinicopathologic findings of 2 patients presenting with this disease. The published reports of primary pure neuroendocrine prostate tumors are discussed.

Small cell carcinoma of the prostate: an immunohistochemical study

Small cell carcinoma of the prostate (SCPC) is morphologically similar to small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC) and maybe misinterpreted as Gleason pattern 5b prostate adenocarcinoma (HGPC). Recognition of SCPC is important because of its different clinical behavior. This study aims to characterize the immunophenotype of histologically classic SCPC using a comprehensive panel of markers, to better understand its histogenesis, aid in its classification, and evaluate potential therapeutic targets. Using the World Health Organization morphologic criteria for SCLC, 18 SCPC cases were identified; and studied for the following tumor marker groups: prostate specific/related, neuroendocrine, sex steroid hormone receptors, and prognostic/treatment target-related. Ten cases of UPC were used as controls. PSA was positive in 17% of SCPC and neuroendocrine markers were expressed in HGPC. PSA, TTF-1 and CD56 were the most helpful markers in differentiating between SCPC and HGPC (P<0.01), whereas bombesin/GRP, c-kit, bcl-2, and EGFR expression was more frequent in SCPC. SCPC is best diagnosed by following the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for SCLC. Immunohistochemical markers can help separate SCPC from HGPC and may be useful in histologically borderline cases. Potential therapeutic targets are identified immunohistochemically in SCPC (Bombesin/GRP, c-kit, bcl-2, and EGFR).

Prostatic neuroendocrine tumor in multiple endocrine neoplasia Type 2B

We report the unusual occurrence of a neuroendocrine prostatic tumor in two young males with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 2B. Immunohistochemistry of the tumor markers may help differentiate a primary neuroendocrine prostate tumor from the metastasis of a medullary thyroid carcinoma of poor prognosis. MEN 2B hallmarks (i.e. plasma thyrocalcitonin and urinary metanephrines) may be systematically investigated in neuroendocrine tumors of the prostate, and conversely prostate examination may be performed in the periodic screening of MEN 2B male patients.

Calcitonin and calcitonin gene-related peptide in the human prostate gland

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin-related peptides have been found in the human prostate, and calcitonin (CT) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) have been demonstrated in subpopulations of neuroendocrine (NE) cells. The purpose of this study was to determine the concentrations of CT and CGRP as well as the densities of NE cells in normal prostates, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and carcinoma of the prostate (CAP).

METHODS

In 42 specimens of radical prostatectomy, the number of CT- and CGRP-immunoreactive NE cells in areas of normal and BPH tissue was determined, and compared with CAP tissue using immunocytochemistry. In addition, by radioimmunoassay (RIA), tissue levels of CT and CGRP were analyzed in extracts from areas of normal, BPH, and CAP tissue, as verified by adjacent histologic sections.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in CT-immunoreactive NE cells was observed in hyperplastic nodules of BPH in comparison to normal tissue. These findings were in parallel with a significant reduction in tissue CT level in BPH compared to normal tissue. There was also a marked, but statistically nonsignificant, reduction in CT levels in CAP tissue. In contrast, levels of CGRP in BPH and CAP tissue did not show any significant differences compared to normal tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

CT and CGRP are present in NE cells of the human prostate. Calcitonin levels are significantly reduced in BPH, in parallel with a decreased number of CT-immunoreactive NE cells, whereas no significant changes in tissue levels of CGRP were observed. The functional significance of these findings is discussed.