Degradation of hamster amelogenins during secretory stage enamel formation in organ culture

Binding of amelogenin to MMP-9 and their co-expression in developing mouse teeth

Amelogenin is the most abundant matrix protein in enamel. Proper amelogenin processing by proteinases is necessary for its biological functions during amelogenesis. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) is responsible for the turnover of matrix components. The relationship between MMP-9 and amelogenin during tooth development remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that MMP-9 binds to amelogenin and they are co-expressed in ameloblasts during amelogenesis. We evaluated the distribution of both proteins in the mouse teeth using immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. At postnatal day 2, the spatial distribution of amelogenin and MMP-9 was co-localized in preameloblasts, secretory ameloblasts, enamel matrix and odontoblasts. At the late stages of mouse tooth development, expression patterns of amelogenin and MMP-9 were similar to that seen in postnatal day 2. Their co-expression was further confirmed by RT-PCR, Western blot and enzymatic zymography analyses in enamel organ epithelial and odontoblast-like cells. Immunoprecipitation assay revealed that MMP-9 binds to amelogenin. The MMP-9 cleavage sites in amelogenin proteins across species were found using bio-informative software program. Analyses of these data suggest that MMP-9 may be involved in controlling amelogenin processing and enamel formation.

Effect of calcium, given before or after a fluoride insult, on hamster secretory amelogenesis in vitro

We tested the hypothesis that high-calcium medium given prior to or immediately after exposure to fluoride (F) reduces the negative effects of F on secretory amelogenesis. Hamster molar tooth germs were grown in organ culture in media with different calcium levels. Deposition of enamel matrix and matrix mineralization were monitored by incorporation of [3H]proline and uptake of 45Ca and acid-soluble 32PO4. Ameloblast structure and the occurrence of a fluorotic enamel matrix were examined by light and electron microscopy. A preculture of explants in high-calcium medium partially prevented the formation of fluorotic (non-mineralizing) enamel matrix, increased matrix secretion but could not prevent F-induced hypermineralization of the pre-exposure enamel. High-calcium medium, applied after F insult, accelerated the recovery of fluorotic matrix, improved ameloblast structure, enhanced amelogenin secretion, and increased enamel thickness. The data indicate that it might be the balance between the amount of mineral deposition and that of matrix secretion which is critical for the mineralization of newly secreted enamel. Exposure to F disturbs this balance by enhancing mineralization of the pre-exposure enamel, probably generating an excess of protons. High calcium may protect against F exposure by enhancing amelogenin secretion into the enamel space, thereby increasing the local buffering capacity at the mineralization front.

Identification of differentially expressed cDNA transcripts from a rat odontoblast cell line

Odontoblasts and osteoblasts are two among the myriads of cell types present in the craniofacial complex. Both have a common ectomesenchymal origin and secrete macromolecules that are necessary for the formation of dentin and alveolar bone via matrix-mediated mechanisms. The mineralized matrices of bone and dentin differ in morphology and function but several mineral associated proteins, formerly thought to be tissue specific, have been found to be common in both tissues. To decipher the complex molecular mechanisms involved in mineralized dentin formation, the suppressive subtraction hybridization (SSH) approach has been used to identify the genes expressed by polarized odontoblasts. Employing SSH, 187 cDNA clones were identified from the subtracted cDNA library. Many of these genes have not been previously reported to be expressed by terminally differentiated odontoblasts. Genes were classified into seven groups based on the predicted function of the encoded proteins: extracellular matrix; cytoskeletal components, molecules involved in adhesion and cell-cell interaction; metabolic enzymes, transporters, ion channels; protein processing, protein transport and protein folding molecules; nuclear proteins (transcription factors, DNA processing enzymes); signaling molecules and genes of yet unknown function. Northern blot and in situ hybridization analysis performed for five putative novel genes and one new isoform of amelogenin revealed differential expression levels in the osteoblasts, ameloblasts and the odontoblasts of the developing rat molars. Some of the known genes isolated from this enriched pool were the cleavage products of dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) namely, phosphophoryn (PP) and dentin sialoprotein (DSP). Interestingly amelogenin, ameloblastin and enamelin were also expressed in the odontoblasts during dentin formation.

Fluoride enhances intracellular degradation of amelogenins during secretory phase of amelogenesis of hamster teeth in organ culture

Amelogenins are the major protein species synthesized by secretory ameloblasts and are believed to be involved in enamel mineralization. During enamel formation, amelogenins are progressively degraded into smaller fragments by protease activity. These amelogenin fragments are removed from the enamel extracellular space, thereby enabling full mineralization of the dental enamel. Enamel from fluorotic teeth is porous and contains more proteins and less mineral than sound enamel. In this study we examined the hypothesis that fluoride (F-) is capable of inhibiting the proteolysis of amelogenins in enamel being formed in organ culture. Hamster molar tooth germs in stages of secretory amelogenesis were pulse labeled in vitro with [3H]- or [14C] proline and subsequently pulse chased. The explants were exposed to F- at different days of chase (i.e., during secretory amelogenesis early after labeling, later after labeling or at stages just beyond secretory amelogenesis). Exposure of secretory stage explants to F- enhanced the release of radiolabeled fragments when F- was applied early after labeling but progressively less if applied later. In contrast, F- had no such effect in stages beyond secretion. The enhanced release of radiolabeled fragments in secretory stages was associated with a reduction of radioactivity in the soft tissue enamel organ indicating that fragmentation of enamel matrix proteins (mainly amelogenins) occurred intracellularly. Analysis by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) demonstrated that the fluorotic enamel contained less radiolabeled parent amelogenins (M(r) 28 kD and 26 kD) but more low-molecular-mass fragments than enamel from control explants. Our data indicate that F- promotes intracellular degradation of the newly synthesized parent amelogenins during secretory stage. Our in vitro data do not support the concept that F- impairs extracellular proteolysis of amelogenins, either in the secretory phase or in the stage just beyond the secretory phase.

The structural biology of the developing dental enamel matrix

The biomineralization of the dental enamel matrix with a carbonated hydroxyapatite mineral generates one of the most remarkable examples of a vertebrate mineralized tissue. Recent advances in the molecular biology of ameloblast gene products have now revealed the primary structures of the principal proteins involved in this extracellular mineralizing system, amelogenins, tuftelins, ameloblastins, enamelins, and proteinases, but details of their secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures, their interactions with other matrix and or cell surface proteins, and their functional role in dental enamel matrix mineralization are still largely unknown. This paper reviews our current knowledge of these molecules, the probable molecular structure of the enamel matrix, and the functional role of these extracellular matrix proteins. Recent studies on the major structural role played by the amelogenin proteins are discussed, and some new data on synthetic amelogenin matrices are reviewed.

Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation

This review focuses on the process of enamel maturation, a series of events associated with slow, progressive growth in the width and thickness of apatitic crystals. This developmental step causes gradual physical hardening and transformation of soft, newly formed enamel into one of the most durable mineralized tissues produced biologically. Enamel is the secretory product of specialized epithelial cells, the ameloblasts, which make this covering on the crowns of teeth in two steps. First, they roughly "map out" the location and limits (overall thickness) of the entire extracellular layer as a protein-rich, acellular, and avascular matrix filled with thin, ribbon-like crystals of carbonated hydroxyapatite. These initial crystals are organized spatially into rod and interrod territories as they form, and rod crystals are lengthened by Tomes' processes in tandem with appositional movement of ameloblasts away from the dentin surface. Once the full thickness of enamel has been formed, ameloblasts initiate a series of repetitive morphological changes at the enamel surface in which tight junctions and deep membrane infoldings periodically appear (ruffle-ended), then disappear for short intervals (smooth-ended), from the apical ends of the cells. As this happens, the enamel covered by these cells changes rhythmically in net pH from mildly acidic (ruffle-ended) to near-physiologic (smooth-ended) as mineral crystals slowly expand into the "spaces" (volume) formerly occupied by matrix proteins and water. Matrix proteins are processed and degraded by proteinases throughout amelogenesis, but they undergo more rapid destruction once ameloblast modulation begins. Ruffle-ended ameloblasts appear to function primarily as a regulatory and transport epithelium for controlling the movement of calcium and other ions such as bicarbonate into enamel to maintain buffering capacity and driving forces optimized for surface crystal growth. The reason ruffle-ended ameloblasts become smooth-ended periodically is unknown, although this event seems to be crucial for sustaining long-term crystal growth.

Protein dynamics of amelogenesis

BACKGROUND

The synthesis, secretion, and fate of matrix proteins released by ameloblasts during enamel formation was studied in continuously erupting rat incisors.

METHODS

Computerized image processing was used to quantify silver grain distribution in radioautographs of sections prepared from rats injected with 3H-methionine, and this was correlated with fluorographs defining radiolabeling patterns of proteins in enamel organ cell and enamel homogenates prepared from freeze-dried teeth of rats injected with 35S-methionine and other radioactive amino acids and precursors such as sugar, sulfate, and phosphate. Some rats were also treated with brefeldin A to characterize newly formed proteins blocked from being secreted from ameloblasts.

RESULTS

The results indicate that ameloblasts rapidly synthesize and secrete (minutes) at least five primary enamel matrix proteins, including a 65 kDa sugar-containing sulfated enamel protein and four nonsulfated proteins with molecular weights near 31, 29, 27, and 23 kDa as estimated by SDS-PAGE. The 27 kDa protein appears to correspond to the primary amelogenin described in many species. The cells also appear to release at least one phosphoprotein with molecular weight near 27 kDa, which may be an amelogenin, and up to five cysteine-containing proteins with molecular weights near 94, 90, 72, 55, and 27 kDa. The proteins collectively are released at interrod and rod growth sites where they appear to remain close to their point of release from ameloblasts. The 65 kDa sulfated protein and 31 kDa nonsulfated protein are rapidly converted into lower molecular weight forms (hours), whereas nonsulfated proteins near 29, 27, and 23 kDa are more slowly transformed into fragments near 20, 18, and 10 kDa in molecular weight (days). These fragments do not accumulate but appear to be removed from the enamel layer as they are created.

CONCLUSIONS

Enamel proteins seen by Coomassie blue (or silver) staining of one-dimensional polyacrylamide gels, therefore, represent a composite image of newly secreted and derived forms of sulfated and nonsulfated proteins that sometimes have similar molecular weights.