Poor prediction of blood transfusion requirements in adult liver transplantations from preoperative variables

Predictors of intraoperative massive transfusion in orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although transfusion management has improved during the last decade, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with considerable blood transfusion requirements which poses some challenges in securing blood bank inventories. Defining the predictors of massive blood transfusion before surgery will allow the blood bank to better manage patients' needs without delays. We evaluated the predictors of intraoperative massive transfusion in OLT.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected on patients who underwent OLT between 2007 and 2017. Repeat OLTs were excluded. Analyzed variables included recipients' demographic and pretransplant laboratory variables, donors' data, and intraoperative variables. Massive transfusion was defined as intraoperative transfusion of ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (RBCs). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 17.0.

RESULTS

The study included 970 OLT patients. The median age of patients was 57 (range: 16-74) years; 609 (62.7%) were male. RBCs, thawed plasma, and platelets were transfused intraoperatively to 782 (80.6%) patients, 831 (85.7%) patients, and 422 (43.5%) patients, respectively. Massive transfusion was documented in 119 (12.3%) patients. In multivariate analysis, previous right abdominal surgery, the recipient's hemoglobin, Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, and operation time were predictive of massive transfusion. There was a direct significant correlation between the number of RBC units transfused and plasma (Pearson correlation coefficient r = .794) and platelets (r = .65).

DISCUSSION

Previous abdominal surgery, the recipient's hemoglobin, MELD score, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, and operation time were predictive of intraoperative massive transfusion in OLT.

Super-massive transfusion during liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Massive hemorrhage and transfusion during liver transplantation (LT) present great challenges. We aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for super-massive transfusion (SMT) and survival outcome and factors that negatively affect survival in patients who received SMT during LT.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We included adult patients undergoing LT from 2004 to 2019. SMT was defined as transfusion of ≥50 units of red blood cells (RBC) during LT. Independent risk factors were identified by multivariable logistic regression. Ninety-day survival was recorded and factors that negatively affected survival were analyzed by the Cox survival test.

RESULTS

Of 2772 patients, 158 (5.6%) received SMT during LT. Mean RBC transfusion was 72.6 (±23.4) units with a maximum of 168 units. Four variables (MELD-Na score, previous upper abdominal surgery, portal vein thrombosis, and remote retransplant) were independent risk factors for SMT (odds ratio 1.800-8.274, 95% CI 1.008-16.685, all p < .005). The 90-day survival rate in SMT patients was 81.6%. Preoperative pulmonary hypertension and massive postreperfusion transfusion negatively affected 90-day survival (hazard ratio 2.658-4.633, 95% CI 1.144-10.130, and all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large retrospective study, we found that SMT occurred in a small percentage of patients and was associated with relatively satisfactory short-term survival. Identification of preoperative risk factors for SMT and factors that negatively affect survival improve our understanding of this unique LT patient population.

Contribution of Salvaged Blood Red Blood Cell Transfusion During Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Transfusion of allogeneic blood products can have adverse effects and profoundly influence postoperative liver transplantation outcomes, including graft survival. To minimize allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, salvaged blood can be used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of salvaged blood to allogeneic RBC transfusion in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients.

METHODS

Data of 311 adult-to-adult LDLT recipients between January 2015 and April 2019 were analyzed. The primary outcome was a change in requirement for allogeneic RBCs due to the use of salvaged blood. Additionally, predictors of intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion were investigated.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-three (49.2%) recipients required allogeneic RBC transfusion. If recipients did not receive salvaged blood, 253 (81.4%) recipients would have needed allogeneic RBC transfusion. The total volume of salvaged blood transfused into recipients during surgery was 269,165 mL, which corresponded to 993 units of allogeneic RBCs and accounted for 76.1% of total RBC transfusion volume. Multivariate analysis showed that male recipients, model for end-stage liver disease score, preoperative hemoglobin level, and volume of salvaged blood used during surgery were independent predictors of the need for intraoperative allogenic RBC transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative use of salvaged blood significantly reduced allogeneic RBC transfusion in LDLT recipients. It can help transplant teams manage transfusion of allogeneic RBCs during liver transplantation.

Haemostasis in cirrhosis: Understanding destabilising factors during acute decompensation

Hospitalised patients with decompensated cirrhosis are in a rebalanced haemostatic state due to a parallel decline in both pro- and anti-haemostatic pathways. However, this rebalanced haemostatic state is highly susceptible to perturbations and may easily tilt towards hypocoagulability and bleeding. Acute kidney injury, bacterial infections and sepsis, and progression from acute decompensation to acute-on-chronic liver failure are associated with additional alterations of specific haemostatic pathways and a higher risk of bleeding. Unfortunately, there is no single laboratory method that can accurately stratify an individual patient's bleeding risk and guide pre-procedural prophylaxis. A better understanding of haemostatic alterations during acute illness would lead to more rational and individualised management of hospitalised patients with decompensated cirrhosis. This review will outline the latest findings on haemostatic alterations driven by acute kidney injury, bacterial infections/sepsis, and acute-on-chronic liver failure in these difficult-to-treat patients and provide evidence supporting more tailored management of bleeding risk.

Development of Machine Learning Models Predicting Estimated Blood Loss during Liver Transplant Surgery

The incidence of major hemorrhage and transfusion during liver transplantation has decreased significantly over the past decade, but major bleeding remains a common expectation. Massive intraoperative hemorrhage during liver transplantation can lead to mortality or reoperation. This study aimed to develop machine learning models for the prediction of massive hemorrhage and a scoring system which is applicable to new patients. Data were retrospectively collected from patients aged >18 years who had undergone liver transplantation. These data included emergency information, donor information, demographic data, preoperative laboratory data, the etiology of hepatic failure, the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, surgical history, antiplatelet therapy, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the preoperative dose of vasopressor, and the estimated blood loss (EBL) during surgery. The logistic regression model was one of the best-performing machine learning models. The most important factors for the prediction of massive hemorrhage were the disease etiology, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), operation duration, body temperature, MELD score, mean arterial pressure, serum creatinine, and pulse pressure. The risk-scoring system was developed using the odds ratios of these factors from the logistic model. The risk-scoring system showed good prediction performance and calibration (AUROC: 0.775, AUPR: 0.753).

Viscoelastic coagulation test for liver transplantation

Coagulation and transfusion management in patients undergoing liver transplantation is challenging. Proper perioperative monitoring of hemostasis is essential to predict the risk of bleeding during surgery, to detect potential causes of hemorrhage in time, and to guide hemostatic therapy. The value of conventional coagulation test is questionable in the acute perioperative setting due to their long turnaround time and the inability to adequately reflect the complex changes in hemostasis in patients with liver disease. Viscoelastic coagulation tests provide simultaneous measurement of multiple aspects of whole-blood coagulation including plasmatic coagulation and fibrinolytic factors and inhibitors that reflect most aspects of hemostasis. Coagulation initiation, mechanical clot stability, and fibrinolysis can be estimated immediately using point-of-care techniques. Therefore, viscoelastic coagulation tests including ROTEM & TEG would be useful to guide patient blood management strategy during liver transplantation.

Use of Rotational Thromboelastometry in Liver Transplantation Is Associated With Reduced Transfusion Requirements

OBJECTIVES

Increased transfusion requirements in liver transplantation have been reported to be associated with worsened outcomes, more frequent reinterventions, and higher expenses. Anesthesiologists might counteract this through improved coagulation management. We evaluated the effects of rotational thromboelastometry on transfusion and coagulation product requirements and on outcome measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who were 14 years or older and who were undergoing liver transplant at Hannover Medical School between January 2005 and December 2009 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, use of rotational thromboelastometry, intraoperative need for blood or coagulation products and antifibrinolytic substances, and clinical course were recorded. Correlations were examined using appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Our study included 413 patients. Use of rotational thromboelastometry was associated with less frequent intraoperative administration of red blood cell concentrates, fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates, prothrombin complex concentrates, and antithrombin concentrates (all P < .05). In addition, univariate and multivariate tests showed that rotational thromboelastometry was correlated with decreased need for red blood cell concentrates and fresh frozen plasma (all P < .05). Intraoperative administration rates of antifibrinolytic substances and fibrinogen concentrate were significantly increased in patients who received rotational thromboelastometry monitoring (both P < .05). However, use of rotational thromboelastometry was not associated with massive transfusion rates (> 10 units vs less), clinical outcome, or length of stay in the intensive care unit (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of rotational thromboelastometry during liver transplant may reduce the need for intraoperative transfusion and coagulation products. Relevant effects of rotational thromboelastometry on patient outcomes or lengths of stay in the intensive care unit could not be ascertained. However, readjustment of therapeutic thresholds may improve the clinical impact.

A data-driven patient blood management strategy in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Blood utilization during liver transplant has decreased, but remains highly variable due to many complex surgical and physiologic factors. Previous models attempted to predict utilization using preoperative variables to stratify cases into two usage groups, usually using entire blood units for measurement. We sought to develop a practical predictive model using specific transfusion volumes (in ml) to develop a data-driven patient blood management strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective evaluation of primary liver transplants at a single institution from 2013 to 2015. Multivariable analysis of preoperative recipient and donor factors was used to develop a model predictive of intraoperative red-blood-cell (pRBC) use.

RESULTS

Of 256 adult liver transplants, 207 patients had complete transfusion volume data for analysis. The median intraoperative allogeneic pRBC transfusion volume was 1250 ml, and the average was 1563 ± 1543 ml. Preoperative haemoglobin, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, preoperative haemodialysis and preoperative international normalized ratio together yielded the strongest model predicting pRBC usage. When it predicted <1250 ml of pRBCs, all cases with 0 ml transfused were captured and only 8·6% of the time >1250 ml were used. This prediction had a sensitivity of 0·91 and a specificity of 0·89. If predicted usage was >2000 ml, 75% of the time blood loss exceeded 2000 ml.

CONCLUSION

Patients likely to require low or high pRBC transfusion volumes were identified with excellent accuracy using this predictive model at our institution. This model may help predict bleeding risk for each patient and facilitate optimized blood ordering.

The Coagulation Profile of End-Stage Liver Disease and Considerations for Intraoperative Management

The coagulopathy of end-stage liver disease results from a complex derangement in both anticoagulant and procoagulant processes. With even minor insults, cirrhotic patients experience either inappropriate bleeding or clotting, or even both simultaneously. The various phases of liver transplantation along with fluid and blood product administration may contribute to additional disturbances in coagulation. Thus, anesthetic management of patients undergoing liver transplantation to improve hemostasis and avoid inappropriate thrombosis in the perioperative environment can be challenging. To add to this challenge, traditional laboratory tests of coagulation are difficult to interpret in patients with end-stage liver disease. Viscoelastic coagulation tests such as thromboelastography (Haemonetics Corporation, Braintree, MA) and rotational thromboelastometry (TEM International, Munich, Germany) have helped to reduce transfusion of allogeneic blood products, especially fresh frozen plasma, but have also lead to the increased use of fibrinogen-containing products. In general, advancements in surgical techniques and anesthetic management have led to significant reduction in blood transfusion requirements during liver transplantation. Targeted transfusion protocols and pharmacologic prevention of fibrinolysis may further aid in the management of the complex coagulopathy of end-stage liver disease.

Preoperative thrombelastography maximum amplitude predicts massive transfusion in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion (MT) is frequently required during liver transplantation. Risk stratification of transplant patients at risk for MT is an appealing concept but remains poorly developed. Thrombelastography (TEG) has recently been shown to reduce mortality when used for trauma resuscitation. We hypothesize that preoperative TEG can be used to risk stratify patients for MT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Liver transplant patients had blood drawn before surgical incision and assayed via TEG. Preoperative TEG measurements were collected in addition to standard laboratory coagulation tests. TEG variables including R-time (reaction time), angle, maximum amplitude (MA), and LY30 (clot lysis 30 min after MA) were correlated to red blood cell units, plasma (fresh frozen plasma), cryoprecipitate, and platelets during the first 24 h after surgery and tested for their performance using a receiver-operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included in the analysis with a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 17; 36% received a MT. The TEG variables associated with MT (defined as ≥10 red blood cell units/24 h) were a low MA (P < 0.001) and low angle (P = 0.014). A high international normalized ratio of prothrombin time (P = 0.003) and low platelet count (P = 0.007) were also associated with MT. MA had the highest area under the curve (0.861) followed by international normalized ratio of prothrombin time (0.803). An MA of less than 47 mm has a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 72% to predict a MT. MA was the only coagulation variable that correlated strongly to all blood products transfused.

CONCLUSIONS

TEG MA has a high predictability of MT during liver transplantation. The use of TEG preoperatively may help guide more cost effective blood bank preparation for this procedure as only a third of patients required a MT.

Big data modeling to predict platelet usage and minimize wastage in a tertiary care system

In modern hospital systems where complicated, severely ill patient populations are the norm, there is currently no reliable way to forecast the use of perishable medical resources to enable a smart and economic way to deliver optimal patient care. We here demonstrate a statistical model using hospital patient data to quantitatively forecast, days in advance, the need for platelet transfusions. This approach can be leveraged to significantly decrease platelet wastage, and, if adopted nationwide, would save approximately 80 million dollars per year. We believe our approach can be generalized to all other aspects of patient care involving timely delivery of perishable medical resources.

Maintaining a robust blood product supply is an essential requirement to guarantee optimal patient care in modern health care systems. However, daily blood product use is difficult to anticipate. Platelet products are the most variable in daily usage, have short shelf lives, and are also the most expensive to produce, test, and store. Due to the combination of absolute need, uncertain daily demand, and short shelf life, platelet products are frequently wasted due to expiration. Our aim is to build and validate a statistical model to forecast future platelet demand and thereby reduce wastage. We have investigated platelet usage patterns at our institution, and specifically interrogated the relationship between platelet usage and aggregated hospital-wide patient data over a recent consecutive 29-mo period. Using a convex statistical formulation, we have found that platelet usage is highly dependent on weekday/weekend pattern, number of patients with various abnormal complete blood count measurements, and location-specific hospital census data. We incorporated these relationships in a mathematical model to guide collection and ordering strategy. This model minimizes waste due to expiration while avoiding shortages; the number of remaining platelet units at the end of any day stays above 10 in our model during the same period. Compared with historical expiration rates during the same period, our model reduces the expiration rate from 10.5 to 3.2%. Extrapolating our results to the ∼2 million units of platelets transfused annually within the United States, if implemented successfully, our model can potentially save ∼80 million dollars in health care costs.

Low Platelet Counts and Prolonged Prothrombin Time Early After Operation Predict the 90 Days Morbidity and Mortality in Living-donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the association between platelet count/prothrombin time early after transplant and short-term outcomes among living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients.

BACKGROUND

Postoperative platelet count and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) were critical biomarkers in LDLT.

METHODS

The study participants consisted of 445 initial LDLT recipients, and perioperative variables, including platelet count and PT-INR, were assessed for their association with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade IIIb/IV) and mortality within 90 days after operation.

RESULTS

Severe complications and operative mortality occurred in 161 (36%) and 23 patients (5%), respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed that a high body mass index [hazard ratio (HR) 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-1.4; P = 0.004] and low platelet count on postoperative day (POD)3 (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.57-0.97; P < 0.001) were independent predictors for grade IIIb/IV complications after LDLT, whereas high PT-INR on POD5 (HR 1.1; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3; P = 0.021) was the only independent factor for operative mortality. In addtion, the progonostic scoring with low platelet count (<50 × 10/L) and prolonged prothrombin time (PT-INR >1.6) within POD5, 1 point for each, was demonstrated to be useful in predicting the development of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb/IV/V complications after LDLT (30% for score 0, 46% for score 1, and 72% for score 2: 0 vs 1, P = 0.004; 0 vs 2, P < 0.001; 1 vs 2, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

PT-INR above 1.6 and platelet count below 50 × 10/L within POD5 were useful predictors of mortality and severe complications after LDLT.

Preoperative risk factors for intra-operative bleeding in pediatric liver transplantation

This study analyzes the preoperative risk factors for intra-operative bleeding in our recent series of pediatric LTs. Between November 2009 and November 2014, 84 consecutive isolated pediatric LTs were performed in 81 children. Potential preoperative predictive factors for bleeding, amount of intra-operative transfusions, postoperative course, and outcome were recorded. Cutoff point for intra-operative HBL was defined as intra-operative RBC transfusions ≥1 TBV. Twenty-six patients (31%) had intra-operative HBL. One-year patient survival after LT was 66.7% (CI 95%=[50.2-88.5]) in HBL patients and 83.8% (CI 95%=[74.6-94.1]) in the others (P=.054). Among 13 potential preoperative risk factors, three of them were identified as independent predictors of high intra-operative bleeding: abdominal surgical procedure(s) prior to LT, factor V level ≤30% before transplantation, and ex situ parenchymal transsection of the liver graft. Based on these findings, we propose a simple score to predict the individual hemorrhagic risk related to each patient and graft association. This score may help to better anticipate intra-operative bleeding and improve patient's management.

The safety of ultrasound guided central venous cannulation in patients with liver disease

Background:

Central venous cannulation (CVC) is frequently required during the management of patients with liver disease with deranged conventional coagulation parameters (CCP). Since CVC is known to be associated with vascular complications, it is standard practice to transfuse Fresh-Frozen Plasma or platelets to correct CCP. These CCP may not reflect true coagulopathy in liver disease. Additionally CVC when performed under ultrasound guidance (USG-CVC) in itself reduces the incidence of complications.

Aim:

To assess the safety of USG-CVC and to evaluate the incidence of complications among liver disease patients with coagulopathy.

Setting and Design:

An audit of all USG-CVCs was performed among adult patients with liver disease in a tertiary care center.

Materials and Methods:

Data was collected for all the adult patients (18-60 years) of either gender suffering from liver disease who had required USG-CVC. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was done to identify possible risk factors for complications.

Results:

The mean age of the patients was 42.1 ± 11.6 years. Mean international normalized ratio was 2.17 ± 1.16 whereas median platelet count was 149.5 (range, 12-683) × 10⁹/L. No major vascular or non-vascular complications were recorded in our patients. Overall incidence of minor vascular complications was 18.6%, of which 13% had significant ooze, 10.3% had hematoma formation and 4.7% had both hematoma and ooze. Arterial puncture and multiple attempts were independent risk factors for superficial hematoma formation whereas low platelet count and presence of ascites were independent risk factors for significant oozing.

Conclusion:

Ultrasound guidance -CVC in liver disease patients with deranged coagulation is a safe and highly successful modality.

TnBP⁄Triton X-45 treatment of plasma for transfusion efficiently inactivates hepatitis C virus

Risk of transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) by clinical plasma remains high in countries with a high prevalence of hepatitis C, justifying the implementation of viral inactivation treatments. In this study, we assessed the extent of inactivation of HCV during minipool solvent/detergent (SD; 1% TnBP / 1% Triton X-45) treatment of human plasma. Luciferase-tagged infectious cell culture-derived HCV (HCVcc) particles were used to spike human plasma prior to treatment by SD at 31 ± 0.5°C for 30 min. Samples were taken before and after SD treatment and filtered on a Sep-Pak Plus C18 cartridge to remove the SD agents. Risk of cytotoxicity was assessed by XTT cell viability assay. Viral infectivity was analyzed based on the luciferase signals, 50% tissue culture infectious dose viral titer, and immunofluorescence staining for HCV NS5A protein. Total protein, cholesterol, and triglyceride contents were determined before and after SD treatment and C18 cartridge filtration. Binding analysis, using patient-derived HCV clinical isolates, was also examined to validate the efficacy of the inactivation by SD. SD treatment effectively inactivated HCVcc within 30 min, as demonstrated by the baseline level of reporter signals, total loss of viral infectivity, and absence of viral protein NS5A. SD specifically targeted HCV particles to render them inactive, with essentially no effect on plasma protein content and hemostatic function. More importantly, the efficacy of the SD inactivation method was confirmed against various genotypes of patient-derived HCV clinical isolates and against HCVcc infection of primary human hepatocytes. Therefore, treatment by 1% TnBP / 1% Triton X-45 at 31°C is highly efficient to inactivate HCV in plasma for transfusion, showing its capacity to enhance the safety of therapeutic plasma products. We propose that the methodology used here to study HCV infectivity can be valuable in the validation of viral inactivation and removal processes of human plasma-derived products.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt before and after Liver Transplantation

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has long been referred to as a procedure performed as "a bridge to transplantation" since, like many other portosystemic shunts, it decompresses the portal circulation and stabilizes patients but does not definitively treat portal hypertension. One of the major advantages of TIPS over surgically placed portosystemic shunts in the transplant era is that the TIPS is intrahepatic and is removed in situ with the native liver, and usually does not need additional surgery (unlike takedown/ligation of surgical shunts). There are several studies that evaluate TIPS before transplantation-not as a bridge/temporizing measure, but as a prelude to the transplant to decompress the portal circulation and reduce portosystemic engorgement and collaterals and thus, in theory, reduce intraoperative bleeding during liver transplantation. However, these studies, mostly in the transplant literature, have been equivocal from an intraoperative and posttransplant clinical outcome standpoint. TIPS creation in liver transplant recipients is another interesting aspect of TIPS. There has been a debate about whether or not liver transplantation adds additional technical difficulty to the TIPS procedure. Initially, many theories were proposed as to the technical difficulty of TIPS in a transplanted liver. However, recent opinions and published studies demonstrate that whole-graft liver transplantation does not pose a significant technical difficulty to TIPS. Moreover, there are several recent studies evaluating the outcomes of TIPS in liver transplant recipients, showing that outcomes are less favorable when compared with TIPS in nontransplanted patients. This article discusses the results of TIPS as a preoperative prelude to liver transplantation. In addition, it discusses the technical and clinical outcomes of TIPS in liver transplant recipients.

Prediction of intraoperative transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplantation and the influence on postoperative patient survival

BACKGROUND

Predicting blood product transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains difficult. Our primary aim in this study was to determine which patient variables best predict recipient risk for large blood transfusion requirements during OLT. The secondary aim was to determine whether the amount of blood products transfused during OLT impacted patient survival.

METHODS

Eight hundred four primary adult OLTs performed during a 9-year period were retrospectively analyzed, and predictive models were developed for blood product usage, usage >20 and usage >30 units of red blood cells (RBCs) plus cell salvage (CS). For survival analysis, potential predictors included all blood products administered during OLT.

RESULTS

For analyses of RBC + CS usage, we used several statistical techniques: regression analysis, logistic regression, and classification and regression tree analysis. Several preoperative factors were highly statistically significant predictors of intraoperative blood product usage in each of the analyses, namely lower platelet count and higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score or one or more of its components (creatinine, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio). Despite these highly significant associations, the models were unable to predict reliably that patients might require the largest amount of blood products during OLT. For example, the classification and regression tree analyses were able to predict only 32% and 11% of patients requiring >20 and >30 units of RBC + CS, respectively. Survival analysis demonstrated poorer survival among patients receiving larger amounts of RBC + CS during OLT.

CONCLUSION

Prediction of intraoperative blood product requirements based on preoperatively available variables is unreliable; however, there is a strong measurable association between transfusion and postoperative mortality.

Monitoring and managing hepatic disease in anaesthesia

Patients with liver disease have multisystem organ dysfunction that leads to physiological perturbations ranging from hyperbilirubinaemia of no clinical consequence to severe coagulopathy and metabolic disarray. Patient-specific risk factors, clinical scoring systems, and surgical procedures stratify perioperative risk for these patients. The anaesthetic management of patients with hepatic dysfunction involves consideration of impaired drug metabolism, hyperdynamic circulation, perioperative hypoxaemia, bleeding, thrombosis, and hepatic encephalopathy.

Prothrombin complex concentrate in the reduction of blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation: PROTON-trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with cirrhosis, the synthesis of coagulation factors can fall short, reflected by a prolonged prothrombin time. Although anticoagulants factors are decreased as well, blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation can still be excessive. Blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation is currently managed by transfusion of red blood cell concentrates, platelet concentrates, fresh frozen plasma, and fibrinogen concentrate. Transfusion of these products may paradoxically result in an increased bleeding tendency due to aggravated portal hypertension. The hemostatic effect of these products may therefore be overshadowed by bleeding complications due to volume overload.In contrast to these transfusion products, prothrombin complex concentrate is a low-volume highly purified concentrate, containing the four vitamin K dependent coagulation factors. Previous studies have suggested that administration of prothrombin complex concentrate is an effective method to normalize a prolonged prothrombin time in patients with liver cirrhosis. We aim to investigate whether the pre-operative administration of prothrombin complex concentrate in patients undergoing liver transplantation for end-stage liver cirrhosis, is a safe and effective method to reduce perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a double blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized trial.Cirrhotic patients with a prolonged INR (≥1.5) undergoing liver transplantation will be randomized between placebo or prothrombin complex concentrate administration prior to surgery. Demographic, surgical and transfusion data will be recorded. The primary outcome of this study is RBC transfusion requirements.

DISCUSSION

Patients with advanced cirrhosis have reduced plasma levels of both pro- and anticoagulant coagulation proteins. Prothrombin complex concentrate is a low-volume plasma product that contains both procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins and transfusion will not affect the volume status prior to the surgical procedure. We hypothesize that administration of prothrombin complex concentrate will result in a reduction of perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Theoretically, the administration of prothrombin complex concentrate may be associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic complications. Therefore, thromboembolic complications are an important secondary endpoint and the occurrence of this type of complication will be closely monitored during the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at http://www.trialregister.nl with number NTR3174. This registry is accepted by the ICMJE.

Effects of preoperative iron deficiency on transfusion requirements in liver transplantation recipients: a prospective observational study

The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of preoperative iron deficiency in adult living donor liver transplantation patients and to investigate its relationship with the need for intraoperative transfusion. Between September 1, 2011, and June 1, 2012, 103 patients scheduled for liver transplantation were included in this prospective study. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to baseline iron status: an iron-deficient group and a non deficient (normal iron profile) group. Iron deficiency was assessed on the basis of several parameters, including transferrin saturation, levels of ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor, C-reactive protein, and peripheral blood smear. Preoperative iron deficiency was diagnosed in 62 patients. Preoperative iron deficiency was associated with low preoperative hemoglobin levels (P = .01) and a high rate of intraoperative transfusion (P < .0001). Preoperative iron deficiency is prognostic factor for predicting intraoperative transfusion requirements. These findings have important implications for transfusion practices for liver transplant recipients.

Changes in transfusion practice over time in adult patients undergoing liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate changes in transfusion practice over time in liver transplantation surgery and to evaluate potential causes for changes in practice and report associated perioperative morbidity and mortality.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single tertiary referral academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Two cohorts of 100 sequential adult primary liver transplant recipients: Early practice (1990-1991) and recent practice (2005-2006).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Perioperative transfusion and hemoglobin data were recorded. Mortality and postoperative complications were identified up to 30 days postoperatively. Appropriate intergroup statistical comparisons were made; p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Compared with the early group, the recent group had significantly fewer perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusions, intraoperative autotransfusions, and transfusions of other blood products. No change in perioperative transfusion triggers was identified. There were no significant alterations in perioperative morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with patients in the early group, recent cohort patients received significantly fewer blood transfusions. The authors attribute this observation to changes in surgical technique rather than a significant alteration in transfusion triggers over the studied time period.

Does the model for end-stage liver disease score predict transfusion amount, acid-base imbalance, haemodynamic and oxidative abnormalities during living donor liver transplantation?

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is associated with the severity of liver failure in transplant patients. This study examined whether life-threatening stress factors during liver transplantation differed according to the patients' preoperative MELD scores. Forty-four patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation were divided into a high MELD group (MELD score ≥ 20) (n = 25) and a low MELD group (MELD score < 20) (n = 19). The volume of blood components transfused, acid-base homeostasis variables, and haemodynamic and oxidative variables were measured at each stage of the surgery. The systemic vascular resistance index was significantly lower in the high MELD group than in the low MELD group at all time points. The oxygen utility index and the oxygen extraction ratio were all significantly lower in the high MELD group than in the low MELD group only at the preanhepatic stage and not at later stages of surgery. Intraoperative transfusion volume and the severity of metabolic acidosis were not associated with the preoperative MELD score.

Risk factors and outcomes of massive red blood cell transfusion following living donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To identify the factors influencing blood loss and secondary blood transfusion and to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent a massive blood transfusion (MBT) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary adult-to-adult right hepatic lobe LDLT were included in the study, and were divided into the MBT group [≥6 red blood cell (RBC) units in 24 h] and the non-massive blood transfusion (NMBT) group (<6 RBC units in 24 h). All potential risk factors, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and long-term survival rate of the patients in the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The data of 181 eligible patients were retrospectively analyzed. A decreased long-term survival rate, a higher incidence of postoperative infection and prolonged ICU stay were observed in the MBT group. No significant difference was observed in survival rate between patients having platelet transfusion>2 units and ≤2 units. Hemoglobin<100 g/L, platelet counts<70×10(9)/L, fibrinogen level<1.5 g/L and history of upper abdominal surgery were found to be independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood transfusion during LDLT can be predicted using preoperative variables. Massive RBC transfusion may lead to poor long-term survival, higher postoperative infection rate and prolonged ICU stay. Platelet transfusion may not be a risk factor for long-term survival.

Preoperative factors as predictors of blood product transfusion requirements in orthotopic liver transplantation

CONTEXT

Intraoperative transfusion can affect the chance of graft survival in liver transplantation, a complicated operation with massive blood loss. Verification of factors that are predictive of intraoperative blood loss and transfusion increases the quality of anesthesia management.

OBJECTIVE

To assess use of blood and blood products between 2002 and 2008 and to evaluate factors associated with blood loss and requirement for blood products in adult patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation via piggyback technique.

DESIGN

Medical charts and anesthesia records from 261 eligible adult recipients of an orthotopic liver transplant between March 2002 and May 2008 were reviewed.

SETTING

Shiraz Liver Transplantation Center, the only active liver transplantation center in Iran.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Potential influencing factors in blood loss and transfusion, including sex, preoperative hemoglobin level, international normalized ratio, primary diagnosis, platelet count, creatinine level, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, central venous pressure, and total anesthesia time, were measured and subjected to multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Mean blood loss was 54.2 (SD, 47.9) mL/kg, the mean (SD) for amounts of blood products transfused was 25.3 (19.5) mL/kg for packed red blood cells, 2.6 (3.3) units for fresh frozen plasma, and 1.7 (3.1) units for platelets. Seven recipients (2.7%) underwent transplantation without intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells, whereas 25 patients (9.6%) received more than 10 units of red blood cells intraoperatively. Multivariable analysis showed that no preoperative factor was a predictor of blood loss or requirement for intraoperative transfusion. Transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and packed red blood cells was significantly lower in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 than in 2003 to 2004 (P < .001).

Anesthesia care for liver transplantation

Intraoperative transfusion practices for liver transplantation have evolved dramatically since the first transplants of the 1960s. It is important for today's clinicians to be current in their understanding of how transplant patients should be managed with regard to their coagulation profile, volume status, and general hemodynamic state. The anesthesia team is presented with the unique task of manipulating this tenuous balance in a rapid and precise manner when managing patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although significant progress has been made in reducing blood product administration, it is still common to encounter large volume blood loss in these cases. Increasingly, clinicians are challenged to justify transfusion practices with a stronger evidentiary base. The current state of the literature for transfusion guidelines and blood product management in this particular patient subset will be discussed, as well as a variety of means (both pharmacologic and otherwise) used to reduce the need for transfusion. The aim was to review the latest evidence on these topics, as well as to highlight areas that need further clarification regarding their role in the optimal care of these patients.

Effects of low central venous pressure during preanhepatic phase on blood loss and liver and renal function in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although the low central venous pressure (LCVP) technique is used to decrease blood loss during liver resection, its efficacy and safety during transplant procedures are still debatable. Our study aimed to assess the effects of this technique and its clinical safety for recipients undergoing liver transplantation.

METHODS

Eighty-six adult patients were randomly divided into a LCVP group and a control group. In the LCVP group, CVP was maintained below 5 mmHg or 40% lower than baseline during the preanhepatic phase by limiting infusion volume, manipulating the patient's posture, and administration of somatostatin and nitroglycerine. Recipients in the control group received standard care. Hemodynamics, blood loss, liver function, and renal function of the two groups were compared perioperatively.

RESULTS

A lower CVP was maintained in the LCVP group during the preanhepatic phase, resulting in a significant decrease in blood loss (1922 +/- 1429 vs. 3111 +/- 1833 ml, P < 0.05) and transfusion volume (1200 +/- 800 vs. 2400 +/- 1200 ml, P < 0.05) intraoperatively. Compared with the control group, the LCVP group had a significantly lower mean arterial pressure at 2 h after the start of the operation (74 +/- 11 vs. 84 +/- 14 mmHg, P < 0.05), a lower lactate value at the end of the operation (5.9 +/- 3.0 vs. 7.2 +/- 3.0 mmol/l, P < 0.05), and a better preservation of liver function after the declamping of the portal vein. There were no significant differences in perioperative renal function and postoperative complications between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The LCVP technique during the preanhepatic phase reduced intraoperative blood loss, protected liver function, and had no detrimental effects on renal function in LT.

How to minimize blood loss during liver surgery in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with liver disease frequently have substantial changes in their haemostatic system. This is reflected in abnormal test results on routine coagulation screening assays such as the prothrombin time (PT), activated thromboplastin time (APTT) and platelet count. Traditionally, attempts were made to correct abnormalities in the haemostatic system as measured by routine coagulation assays prior to invasive procedures by infusion of platelets or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Recent laboratory and clinical data have indicated that the haemostatic reserve in cirrhotic patients is relatively well maintained although the coagulation screening assays suggest otherwise. Pre-procedural correction of coagulation tests with blood products may therefore not be necessary, and may even have harmful side-effects. In particular, fluid overload resulting in exacerbation of portal hypertension by infusion of blood products may in fact promote bleeding. In recent years, it has become clear that reduction of the central and portal venous pressure by fluid restriction and avoidance of blood product transfusion is a beneficial strategy in minimizing bleeding during liver surgery in cirrhotic patients. Some investigators have even taken this a step further and suggested pre-procedural phlebotomy in liver transplant recipients. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of recent studies and developments which have changed our understanding of the clinical relevance of abnormal coagulation tests in patients with cirrhosis, and which have contributed to a reduction in blood loss and transfusion requirements when liver surgery is needed in these patients.

Bleeding in liver surgery: prevention and treatment

Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion of blood products are negatively associated with postoperative outcome after liver surgery. Blood loss can be minimized by surgical methods, including vascular clamping techniques, the use of dissection devices, and the use of topical hemostatic agents. Preoperative correction of coagulation tests with blood products has not been shown to reduce intraoperative bleeding and it may, in fact, enhance the bleeding risk. Maintaining a low central venous pressure has been shown to be effective in reducing blood loss during partial liver resections, and volume contraction rather than prophylactic transfusion blood products seems justified in patients undergoing major liver surgery. Although antifibrinolytic drugs have proved to be effective in reducing blood loss during liver transplantation, systemic hemostatic drugs are of limited value in reducing blood loss in patients undergoing partial liver resections.

Changing trends in transfusion practice in liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prevention of excessive blood loss is an important issue in the perioperative management of liver transplantation. This review describes changing trends in blood products use, risk predicting of blood transfusion, variability in use and practices, as well as transfusion safety during liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last 20 years, the average use of blood products per case has considerably decreased. There are marked interinstitutional differences in blood use. Differences in patient population characteristics and surgical techniques are a partial explanation, but differences in transfusion practices probably account for a substantial part of the variability. Recent data have sparked off ongoing controversy relating to volume replacement therapy and its impact on blood loss. New studies emphasize the risks associated with transfusion in liver transplantation.

SUMMARY

Recent studies call for continuing every reasonable effort to minimize the use of blood components and can guide us in new approaches to this vital problem.

Intraoperative massive transfusion decreases survival after liver transplantation

Patients undergoing liver transplantation often experience coagulopathy and massive intraoperative blood loss that can lead to morbidity and reduced survival. The aim of this study was to verify the survival rate and discover predictive factors for death among liver transplant patients who received massive intraoperative blood transfusions. This cohort study was based on prospective data collected retrospectively from January 2004 to July 2006. The 232 patients were distributed according to their blood requirements, (namely, more or less than 6 units), including red blood cell saver. The statistical analyses were performed using Student t test, Cox hazard regression, and the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test). The massively transfused cohort displayed higher Child-Pugh classifications (10.2 vs 9.6; P = .03); model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores (19 vs 17; P = .02); recipient weights (75.4 vs 71 kg; P = .03); as well as warm ischemia times (70.7 vs 56.4 minutes; P < .001) and surgery times (584.6 vs 503.4 minutes; P < .05). The proportional hazard (Cox) regression analysis showed that the risk of death increased 2.1% for each unit of donor sodium and 1.6% for each additional year of donors age over 50. The survival rates at 6, 12, 60, and 120 months for > or = 6 vs <6 U of blood transfusion of 63.8% vs 83.3%; 53.9% vs 76.3%; 40% vs 60%; 34.5% vs 49.2%. In conclusion, we observed that patients receiving over 6 red blood cell units intraoperatively displayed reduced survival. Predictive factors for this risk factor were high donor level of sodium and of age.

Predictors of blood product use in orthotopic liver transplantation using the piggyback hepatectomy technique

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has historically been associated with massive blood loss and hemodynamic instability related to the coexistence of varices, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, and portal hypertension. Piggyback hepatectomy (PGB) is a technique increasingly utilized in OLT to avoid veno-venous bypass and vena cava clamping. This study evaluated the factors associated with blood loss and blood product requirement in PGB.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of the anesthesia preoperative and operative notes and computerized lab values for all adult cadaveric liver transplants over a 42-month period. These data were combined with the liver transplant database for analysis. Approximately 98% of the transplants were performed using a standard piggyback approach with no use of veno-venous bypass.

RESULTS

Data were included for all 526 transplants performed during this time period. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was 1000 cc. Median transfusion requirement was 3 units packed red blood cells, 7 units fresh frozen plasma, and 6 units platelets. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that predictors of EBL were age, MELD score, preoperative hemoglobin, initial fibrinogen, initial central venous pressure, and total anesthesia time. Predictors of PRBC useage were age, MELD score, preoperative hemoglobin, initial fibrinogen, and anesthesia time. Postoperatively increased transfusion requirement was associated with increased length of hospital stay and lower 90-day and 1-year graft and patient survivals.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that PGB can be safely accomplished in nearly all liver transplant patients without venovenous bypass or vena cava clamping and with less warm ischemia, which may ultimately be associated with less perioperative morbidity and improved outcomes.

Derivation of a risk index for the prediction of massive blood transfusion in liver transplantation

Massive blood transfusion (MBT) remains a serious and common occurrence in liver transplantation surgery. This retrospective cohort study was undertaken to identify preoperative predictors of MBT and to develop a risk index for MBT in liver transplantation. Data were retrospectively collected on all liver transplantations carried out at a single institution between January 1998 and March 2004. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictor variables of MBT, defined as >/=6 units of red blood cell concentrate (RBC) in the first 24 hours of surgery. The model was internally validated by bootstrapping. Of the 460 liver transplant recipients, 193 (42%) received >/=6 units of RBC within 24 hours of surgery. Unadjusted analyses identified 12 preoperative predictors of MBT: age, height, gender, repeat transplantation, etiology of liver failure, and preoperative laboratory values (hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, international normalized ratio for prothrombin activity [INR], albumin, total bilirubin, and creatinine). In multivariable logistic regression, 7 independent predictors of MBT were identified: age (>40 years), hemoglobin concentration (</=10.0 g/dL), INR (1.2-1.99, and >2.0), platelet count (</=70 x 10(9)/L), creatinine (>/=110 micromol/L for female subjects and >/=120 micromol/L for male subjects), albumin (< 28 g/L), and repeat transplantation. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) for the model was 0.82. By using the regression beta coefficients to derive weights for each of these predictors, a risk index was developed that assigned each patient a score between 0 and 8. The ROC for this risk index was 0.79. MBT in liver transplantation surgery can be accurately predicted by 7 readily available preoperative predictors.

Trauma Associated Severe Hemorrhage (TASH)-Score: probability of mass transfusion as surrogate for life threatening hemorrhage after multiple trauma

BACKGROUND

To develop a simple scoring system that allows an early and reliable estimation for the probability of mass transfusion (MT) as a surrogate for life threatening hemorrhage following multiple trauma.

METHODS

Potential clinical and laboratory variables documented in the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society (DGU) (1993-2003; n=17,200) were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict the probability for MT.

RESULTS

Clinical and laboratory variables available from data sets were screened for their association with mass transfusion. MT was defined by transfusion requirement of >or=10 units of packed red blood cells from emergency room (ER) to intensive care unit admission. Seven independent variables were identified to be significantly correlated with an increased probability for MT: systolic blood pressure (<100 mm Hg=4 pts, <120 mm Hg=1 pt), hemoglobin (<7 g/dL=8 pts, <9 g/dL=6 pts, <10 g/dL=4 pts, <11 g/dL=3 pts, and <12 g/dL=2 pts), intra-abdominal fluid (3 pts), complex long bone and/or pelvic fractures (AIS 3/4=3 pts and AIS 5=6 pts), heart rate (>120=2 pts), base excess (<-10 mmol/L=4 pts, <-6 mmol/L=3 pts, and <-2 mmol/L=1 pt), and gender (male=1 pt). These variables were incorporated into a risk score, the Trauma Associated Severe Hemorrhage Score (TASH-Score, 0-28 points). Performance of the score was tested with respect to discrimination, precision, and calibration. Increasing TASH-Score points were associated with an increasing probability for MT.

CONCLUSION

The TASH-Score is an easy-to-use scoring system that reliably predicts the probability for MT after multiple trauma. Taken as a surrogate for life threatening bleeding calculation may focus attention on relevant variables indicative for risk and impact strategies to stop bleeding and stabilize coagulation in acute trauma care.

Elective Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Portal Decompression in the Immediate Pretransplantation Period in Adult Living Related Liver Transplant Recipient Candidates: Preliminary Results

PURPOSE

To evaluate (i) the efficacy of purposeful creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) before transplantation to optimize potential living related liver transplantation (LRLTx) and (ii) the efficacy of TIPS creation in this setting in reducing perioperative resource utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of the records of patients who underwent adult LRLTx with or without preoperative TIPS creation from October 2003 through April 2005. Patients were evaluated for preoperative parameters (Child-Pugh class, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score, and coagulation parameters), intraoperative parameters (blood transfusion requirements and operative time), and postoperative parameters (intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and 30-day repeat operation and mortality rates). Comparison between the two treatment groups was made with the Mann-Whitney U test. Within the TIPS group, comparison of blood transfusion requirements was performed by one-way analysis of variance based on the degree of portosystemic gradient reduction after TIPS creation.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included in the TIPS group, and 12 patients were included in the group without TIPS. Median time between TIPS and transplantation was 2 days. There was no statistical difference in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters between groups except for the APACHE II score (P<.002), which was higher in the TIPS group. Despite this, the outcome and postoperative hospital resource utilization were similar between groups. Intraoperative blood transfusion based on the degree of portosystemic gradient reduction after TIPS creation was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly created TIPS do not interfere with the intraoperative technical and perioperative clinical aspects of adult LRLTx. Preoperative TIPS creation before transplantation may reduce the postoperative morbidity and mortality seen in liver transplant recipients who have a greater APACHE II score at the outset of treatment.

Preoperative characteristics and intraoperative transfusion and vasopressor requirements in patients with low vs. high MELD scores

Recent changes in organ allocation based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) prioritize the most ill patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. While patients undergoing liver transplantation in the MELD era are more acutely ill, the impact of the policy changes on perioperative management has not been completely assessed. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 124 primary adult liver transplant patients. Patients were divided into low (< or = 30) and high MELD (>30) score groups. Preoperative characteristics and intraoperative management were compared between the 2 groups. Patients with high MELD scores had lower baseline hematocrit and fibrinogen levels and were more likely to require ventilatory and vasopressor support before transplantation. Intraoperative transfusion requirements and use of vasopressors were also significantly increased in patients with high MELD scores compared to patients with low MELD scores. In conclusion, these data suggest that pretransplant MELD scores provide important information for perioperative management of patients undergoing liver transplantation.

A comparison of transfusion requirements between living donation and cadaveric donation liver transplantation: relationship to model of end-stage liver disease score and baseline coagulation status

The use of living donation is an important option for patients in need of liver transplant. We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, baseline coagulation laboratory results, and intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells and component therapy for 27 living donation transplants and 69 cadaveric donation transplants during a 3-yr period (2001-2004). Patients undergoing living donation transplantation had significantly lower MELD scores and preserved coagulation function compared with cadaveric donation transplantation recipients (P < 0.001). The living donation transplant patients also received significantly fewer transfusions of red blood cells and component therapy compared with the cadaveric donation transplant patients (P < 0.001). For the combined population of both cadaveric donation transplant and living donation transplant patients, there were significant associations between MELD score and preoperative coagulation tests (P < 0.001) and intraoperative transfusion of blood and component therapy. MELD score and preoperative fibrinogen concentration were identified as independent predictors of transfusion exposure. In conclusion, we detected significant differences in severity of disease at time of transplantation, degree of impairment of coagulation function, and need for transfusion of red blood cells and component therapy between patients undergoing living donation transplantation compared with patients undergoing cadaveric donation transplantation.

Intraoperative blood loss during living donor liver transplantation: an analysis of 635 recipients at a single center

BACKGROUND

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been an important option in the treatment of patients with end-stage liver disease. Massive intraoperative blood loss can occur during LDLT, necessitating blood transfusion. The purpose of this study was to present blood loss data from the recipients of LDLT, to assess the effect of massive intraoperative blood loss on prognosis, and to assess the reliability of preoperative information in predicting intraoperative blood transfusion requirements in LDLT.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 635 patients who underwent LDLTs between January 1995 and March 2002 at a university hospital were retro- spectively investigated. The volume of blood loss, prognosis, and preoperative variables were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 5.15 to 1980 mL per kg (mean, 136 mL/kg). Massive blood loss negatively affected survival not only immediately after operation (high blood loss [HBL]:low blood loss [LBL] ratio, 85.5%:93.9% at 1 month) but also over the long term (HBL:LBL, 61.4%:76.8% at 5 years). Preoperative risk factors for massive blood loss were determined to be recipient age (<1 years), weight (<10 kg), C-reactive protein (>2 mg/dL), hematocrit (<30%), total bilirubin (>20.0 mg/dL), direct bilirubin (>16.0 mg/dL), and blood urea nitrogen levels (>30.0 mg/dL).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk factors associated with massive intraoperative blood loss during LDLT were identified. This is the first analysis of blood loss during LDLT at a single center. Massive blood loss is a predictor of poor prognosis in LDLT patients.

A review of aprotinin in orthotopic liver transplantation: can its harmful effects offset its beneficial effects?

Blood transfusion can adversely affect patient outcome and graft survival in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). With this respect, prophylactic aprotinin administration decreases blood loss, transfusion requirements, and the hemodynamic changes associated with graft reperfusion in patients undergoing OLT. However, data indicate limiting the use of aprotinin in OLT: (a) clinical, biological, echocardiographic, and postmortem findings recorded in patients with chronic liver disease or undergoing OLT suggest that a continuous prothrombotic state exists in these patients. Whether the inhibition of fibrinolysis associated with aprotinin therapy will expose some patients to untoward thrombosis is questionable; (b) aprotinin does not appear to alter postoperative outcome in patients undergoing OLT; (c) aprotinin decreases blood transfusion requirements only when surgery is associated with significant blood loss. However, at the present time, median transfusion requirements of 2 to 5 red blood cell units are required in OLT.