Comparison of the effects of salmeterol and ipratropium bromide on exercise performance and breathlessness in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Long-acting beta-agonists in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current and future agents

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airflow limitation and debilitating symptoms. For patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, long-acting bronchodilators are the mainstay of therapy; as symptoms progress, guidelines recommend combining bronchodilators from different classes to improve efficacy. Inhaled long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) have been licensed for the treatment of COPD since the late 1990s and include formoterol and salmeterol. They improve lung function, symptoms of breathlessness and exercise limitation, health-related quality of life, and may reduce the rate of exacerbations, although not all patients achieve clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms or health related quality of life. In addition, LABAs have an acceptable safety profile, and are not associated with an increased risk of respiratory mortality, although adverse effects such as palpitations and tremor may limit the dose that can be tolerated. Formoterol and salmeterol have 12-hour durations of action; however, sustained bronchodilation is desirable in COPD. A LABA with a 24-hour duration of action could provide improvements in efficacy, compared with twice-daily LABAs, and the once-daily dosing regimen could help improve compliance. It is also desirable that a new LABA should demonstrate fast onset of action, and a safety profile at least comparable to existing LABAs.A number of novel LABAs with once-daily profiles are in development which may be judged against these criteria. Indacaterol, a LABA with a 24-hour duration of bronchodilation and fast onset of action, is the most advanced of these. Preliminary results from large clinical trials suggest indacaterol improves lung function compared with placebo and other long-acting bronchodilators. Other LABAs with a 24-hour duration of bronchodilation include carmoterol, vilanterol trifenatate and oldaterol, with early results indicating potential for once-daily dosing in humans.The introduction of once-daily LABAs also provides the opportunity to develop combination inhalers of two or more classes of once-daily long-acting bronchodilators, which may be advantageous for COPD patients through simplification of treatment regimens as well as improvements in efficacy. Once-daily LABAs used both alone and in combination with long-acting muscarinic antagonists represent a promising advance in the treatment of COPD, and are likely to further improve outcomes for patients.

One hundred years of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasing health problem and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, but knowledge about its pathogenesis has increased substantially in recent years. The disease results from interaction between individual risk factors (like enzymatic deficiencies) and environmental exposures to noxious agents, like cigarette smoking, occupational dusts, air pollution and infections in childhood. The main mechanisms that may contribute to airflow limitation in COPD are fixed narrowing of small airways, emphysema and luminal obstruction with mucus secretions. COPD is characterised by a chronic inflammatory process in the pulmonary tissue, with a pattern different from bronchial asthma, associated with extrapulmonary effects and is considered now a complex, systemic disease. Optimal therapeutic targeting of COPD depends on a clear understanding of the precise mechanisms of these complex processes and on early and correct evaluation of disease severity. A combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches is used to treat COPD. Bronchodilators are the mainstay of COPD treatment and can be combined with inhaled corticosteroids for greater efficacy and fewer side effects. The use of LTOT for hypoxemic patients has resulted in increased survival, and expanded drug therapy options have effectively improved dyspnoea and quality of life. Recent studies have documented the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation. In addition, non-invasive mechanical ventilation offers new alternatives for patients with acute or chronic failure.

Efficacy of Nebulized Flunisolide Combined with Salbutamol and Ipratropium Bromide in Stable Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of nebulized corticosteroids in the prevention of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been poorly studied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nebulized flunisolide (1 mg) + salbutamol/ipratropium bromide (1,875/375 microg) b.i.d. in comparison with placebo + salbutamol/ipratropium bromide.

METHODS

This was a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study on 114 patients with COPD of moderate-to-severe degree. The main outcome was the frequency of severe exacerbations over a 6-month period. Before and after treatment, respiratory symptoms, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), shuttle walking test distance and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

The total number of exacerbations was slightly lower in the flunisolide group compared to the placebo group (19 vs. 34, p = 0.054); the number of patients experiencing at least one exacerbation during the study was also decreased (16 vs. 26, p = 0.059). In particular, type 3 Anthonisens's exacerbations were significantly reduced by flunisolide (p = 0.044). In the placebo group, scores were higher than in the flunisolide group but nonsignificant for dyspnea, cough, sputum amount and purulence. FEV(1) was significantly increased compared to baseline in both groups, and the area under the FEV(1)-time curve during the 6-month period was significantly greater in the flunisolide group (5.2 +/- 10.6 vs. 2.1 +/- 5.0, flunisolide vs. placebo, respectively; p = 0.047). For shuttle walking test distance and scores of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, no significant difference between the baseline evaluation and the end of the study was observed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Nebulized flunisolide is a good alternative to other inhaled corticosteroids when added to nebulized salbutamol/ipratropium bromide in the long-term treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD patients.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Tulobuterol in the Treatment of Stable COPD: An Open-Label Comparison with Inhaled Salmeterol

BACKGROUND

Long-acting bronchodilators are recommended for the management of stable COPD to relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. The tulobuterol patch (Hokunalin) is a transdermal patch preparation of the beta2-adrenoceptor agonist (beta2-agonist) tulobuterol designed to yield sustained beta(2)-agonistic effects for 24 hours when applied once daily.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of tulobuterol patch and inhaled salmeterol (Serevent Diskus) in the treatment of stable COPD.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinically stable COPD patients (age > or = 40 years, postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70%, and postbronchodilator FEV1 <80% predicted) were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label randomized study. After a 2-week run-in period, patients were administered either tulobuterol (2mg once-daily applied as a patch) or salmeterol (50 microg per inhalation, twice a day) for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Data for 92 patients (46 each for each treatment group) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics in the tulobuterol versus salmeterol groups: age, 69.2 +/- 7.4 vs 71.6 +/- 7.3 years; male, 91% versus 96%; and patients with stage II (III) COPD, 32.6% (67.4%) versus 50% (50%). FEV1, FVC, and PEF improved during treatment in both groups compared with baseline, with no significant between group differences. The total St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score was significantly improved relative to baseline in the tulobuterol group at 8 weeks (-4.7 units [U]), but not in the salmeterol group at all timepoints. Domain analysis of the SGRQ scores revealed significant improvement in the symptom score relative to baseline in the tulobuterol group at weeks 4 (-6.9U), 8 (-12.0U), and 12 (-11.7U), but not in the salmeterol group in any of the domains tested. Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score improved during treatment in both groups, with no significant differences between groups. Compliance with the treatment regimen was significantly better in the tulobuterol than in the salmeterol group (98.5% vs 94.1%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that once-daily transdermal sustained-release tulobuterol is as effective or better than the inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol in the management of stable COPD, with significant effects on quality of life.

Long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonists for stable COPD

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and mechanisms of benefit, formulations available, drug costs, pharmacokinetic profiles, and pertinent clinical studies for long-acting beta(2)-agonists.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted from July 1966 through October 2002.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent articles related to COPD and long-acting beta(2)-agonists.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The incidence and subsequent morbidity and mortality of COPD have increased during the last 4 decades, prompting worldwide initiatives to formulate guidelines to decrease the burden of this disease. COPD is a progressive, irreversible disease state characterized by chronic cough, dyspnea, sputum production, and wheezing, in which no medication has been shown to decrease mortality, excluding oxygen supplementation. Bronchodilators have been a mainstay of COPD treatment through their ability to work by both smooth- and non-smooth-muscle mechanisms. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists (i.e., formoterol, salmeterol) dosed twice daily provide more convenient dosing than 4-times-daily regimens of traditional short-acting bronchodilators. Both formoterol and salmeterol have acceptable adverse event profiles when used at recommended doses. There have been no direct clinical outcome studies comparing formoterol and salmeterol, but both have shown some benefits over ipratropium and theophylline in improving the symptoms, spirometric indices, exacerbations, and quality of life of patients with COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidence, long-acting beta(2)-agonists are acceptable first-line agents for patients with COPD.

Advances in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive and irreversible airflow limitation with extreme economic and social burden. It is estimated that over the next two decades, it will become the 5(th) most prevalent disease and the 3(rd) most common cause of death in the world. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of airway inflammation and alveolar destruction allows for the development of new therapeutic targets. Tobacco smoking is the most important risk factor in the development of COPD, thus making smoking cessation of the outermost importance. This article provides a critical review of present therapy for COPD. In addition to conventional treatment (bronchodilators, corticosteroids and antibiotics) and smoking cessation therapies, novel approaches with potential benefit are discussed.

Cardiovascular safety of salmeterol in COPD

BACKGROUND

Patients with COPD have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Despite the clinical benefits of long-acting beta-agonist agents in the treatment of COPD, patients may be at an increased risk of cardiovascular toxicity, including tachyarrhythmia due to beta-adrenergic stimulation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cardiovascular safety of salmeterol in COPD patients by conducting a pooled analysis of cardiovascular safety data.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multiple-dose studies, which included salmeterol, 50 micro g bid, and placebo arms.

STUDY SELECTION

Seven of a total of 17 studies met the predefined inclusion requirements and were pooled. A total of 1,443 patients received placebo, while 1,410 patients received salmeterol, 50 micro g bid. The median duration of treatment was 24 weeks (range, 12 to 52 weeks).

RESULTS

Treatment with salmeterol, 50 micro g bid, showed no increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) compared with placebo (relative risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 1.3; p = 0.838). Both groups had a similar incidence of cardiovascular events (8%), including cardiovascular deaths. The incidence of cardiovascular AEs increased with age, concurrent cardiovascular conditions, and treatment with antiarrhythmic/bradycardic agents, although increases were comparable in both treatment groups. There were no episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia, and no clinically significant differences were observed in 24-h heart rate, ventricular and supraventricular ectopic events, qualitative ECGs, QT intervals, or vital signs between the salmeterol, 50 micro g bid, group and the placebo group. Similar findings were observed when patients were stratified for age of > 65 years or the known presence of cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with salmeterol, 50 micro g bid, does not increase the risk of cardiovascular AEs in this population of COPD patients compared with placebo.

The effect of inhaled beta2-agonists on clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The major clinical outcomes measured in evaluating the responses to pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) include the severity of dyspnea, exercise capacity, exacerbations, and health status. Various studies have demonstrated that testing for acute bronchodilator reversibility in the pulmonary function laboratory does not predict the clinical responses to a trial of bronchodilator therapy in patients with COPD. Separate studies have shown that inhaled albuterol, both a single dose (300 microg) and 2 weeks of therapy (200 microg/4x/day), reduces dyspnea. There is more published information available about the effects of long-acting (>/=12 hours' duration of action) inhaled beta(2)-agonists because of greater interest in considering clinical outcomes at the time of drug testing. In one randomized clinical trial, formoterol reduced symptoms (as recorded in a home diary) and improved health status. Nine clinical studies have examined the effects of salmeterol on clinical outcomes. Salmeterol reduced the perception of breathlessness (in 6 of 9 studies) and improved health status (in 3 of 4 studies). These results collectively demonstrate that long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonists not only relax bronchial smooth muscle but also provide important clinical benefits in symptomatic patients with COPD.

Effects of formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler) and ipratropium on exercise capacity in patients with COPD

Although long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonists improve various outcome measures in COPD, no double-blind study has yet shown a significant effect of these drugs on exercise capacity. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, patients received formoterol (4, 5, 9, or 18 micrograms b.i.d. via Turbuhaler), ipratropium bromide (80 micrograms t.i.d. via pMDI with spacer), or placebo for 1 week. Main endpoint was time to exhaustion (TTE) in an incremental cycle ergometer test. Secondary endpoints were Borg dyspnoea score during exercise, lung function, and adverse events. Thirty-four patients with COPD were included, mean age 64.8 years, FEV1 55.6% predicted, reversibility 6.1% predicted. All doses of formoterol, and ipratropium significantly improved TTE, FEV1, FEF25-75%, FRC, IVC, RV and sGAW compared with placebo. A negative dose-response relationship was observed with formoterol. Ipratropium increased time to exhaustion more compared with formoterol, 18 micrograms, but not with formoterol, 4.5 and 9 micrograms. No changes in Borg score were found. There was no difference in the adverse event profile between treatments. In conclusion, 1 week of treatment with formoterol and ipratropium significantly improved exercise capacity and lung function compared with placebo. However, a negative dose-response relation for formoterol was unexpected and needs further investigation.

New therapeutic drugs in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remains a major health problem for which new and improved treatments are desperately needed. Recent trials strongly suggest that treatments are improving. Longer-acting bronchodilators will be more convenient and may have additional advantages. Combinations of bronchodilators may offer additive effects and, possibly, synergies. Inhaled glucocorticoids, although unable to alter the loss of forced expiratory volume in 1 second when used alone, may reduce exacerbation frequency and health status deterioration and improve mortality. These clinically meaningful goals represent end points not previously targeted in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease drug development. Moreover, inhaled glucocorticoids may offer benefits in combination with long-acting beta-agonists. Finally, new classes of agents such as the phosphodiesterase inhibitors are on the horizon. The prospect for better treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease looks brighter than ever. Caution is required, however. Much of the excitement has been generated by small studies, presented only in abstract form, and as yet unpublished work. Therapeutic recommendations will require publication of appropriately designed and adequately powered clinical trials.

Salmeterol plus theophylline combination therapy in the treatment of COPD

BACKGROUND

Patients with COPD often require multiple therapies to improve lung function and decrease symptoms and exacerbations. Salmeterol and theophylline are indicated for the treatment of COPD, but the use of these agents in combination has not been extensively studied.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol plus theophylline vs either agent alone in COPD.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial in 943 patients with COPD. After an open-label theophylline titration period (serum levels, 10 to 20 microg/mL), patients were randomly assigned to receive salmeterol (42 microg bid) plus theophylline, salmeterol (42 microg bid), or theophylline for 12 weeks. Serial pulmonary function tests were completed on day 1 and treatment week 12. Patients kept diary cards and noted their peak flow rates, symptom scores, and albuterol use, and periodically completed quality-of-life and dyspnea questionnaires.

RESULTS

All three groups significantly improved compared with baseline. Combination treatment with salmeterol plus theophylline provided significantly (p < or = 0.045) greater improvements in pulmonary function; significantly (p < or = 0.048) greater decreases in symptoms, dyspnea, and albuterol use; and significantly fewer COPD exacerbations (p = 0.023 vs theophylline). In general, treatment with salmeterol provided greater improvement in lung function and satisfaction with treatment compared with theophylline. Salmeterol treatment was also associated with significantly fewer drug-related adverse events (p < or = 0.042) than either treatment that included theophylline. The safety profile (adverse events, vital signs, and ECG findings) of the two treatments that included theophylline were similar.

CONCLUSION

Patients with COPD may benefit from combination treatment with salmeterol plus theophylline, without a resulting increase in adverse events or other adverse sequelae.

Effectiveness of salmeterol versus ipratropium bromide on exertional dyspnoea in COPD

The hypothesis of the study was that salmeterol and ipratropium would have similar dyspnoea ratings during steady-state cycle ergometry at 1 h, but that salmeterol would reduce dyspnoea at 6 h after administration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study design was a randomized, double-blind trial in 16 patients (aged 63 +/- 11 yrs) with symptomatic COPD. Two days after familiarization with testing procedures, patients were randomly assigned to receive either two puffs (42 microg) of salmeterol and two puffs of placebo inhaler, or two puffs (36 microg) of ipratropium from each of two inhalers (total, 72 microg). Two days later, patients received the alternative medication. During exercise at 60% of peak oxygen consumption patients rated dyspnoea and performed inspiratory capacity manoeuvres each minute. Forced expiratory volume in one second was 1.13+/-0.48 L (37+/-13% predicted). Dyspnoea ratings were similar for salmeterol and ipratropium at 1 and 6 h. Inspiratory capacity was similar for salmeterol and ipratropium at 1 h, but significantly higher for salmeterol at 6 h (delta = 120 mL; p = 0.03). It is concluded that with the doses used, salmeterol and ipratropium provided similar dyspnoea ratings during exercise at 1 and 6 h after administration.

Long-acting beta2 agonists in the management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Long-acting beta2 agonist bronchodilators (e.g. formoterol, salmeterol) are a new interesting therapeutic option for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the short term, both salmeterol and formoterol appear to be more effective than short-acting beta2 agonists, and in patients with stable COPD they are more effective than anticholinergic agents and theophylline. Regular treatment of patients with COPD with long-acting beta2 agonists can induce an improvement in the respiratory function and certain aspects of quality of life. Moreover, salmeterol seems to be better than ipratropium and theophylline in improving lung function at the recommended doses after a long term treatment. Use of combination therapy of a long-acting inhaled beta2 agonist and an anticholinergic agent or theophylline in patients with COPD has not been sufficiently studied. Combination of usual doses of ipratropium or oxitropium with usual doses of salmeterol or formoterol does not appear to improve pulmonary function, but this lack of improvement with the combination should not, in itself, prevent implementation of further therapeutic steps in patients responsive to an anticholinergic agent and/or salmeterol or formoterol administered singly. Neither formoterol nor salmeterol elicit significant cardiovascular effects in healthy individuals and patients with reversible airway obstruction. However, adverse cardiac events might occur in patients with COPD with pre-existing cardiac arrhythmias and hypoxaemia if they use long-acting 12 agonists, although the recommended single dose of salmeterol 50 microg or formoterol 12 microg ensures a relatively higher safety margin than formoterol 24 microg. The bronchodilatory effect of long-acting beta2 agonists seems to be fairly stable after regular treatment with these bronchodilators. Moreover, pre-treatment with a conventional dose of formoterol or salmeterol does not preclude the possibility of inducing further bronchodilation with salbutamol in patients with partially reversible COPD. All these findings support the use of long-acting beta2 agonist bronchodilators as first-line bronchodilator therapy for the long term treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with COPD. However, since physicians must always choose a drug that is highly efficacious, well tolerated and inexpensive, the cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to other bronchodilators will determine the proper place of long-acting beta2 agonists in the long term therapy of stable COPD.

Bronchodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This paper reviews new developments in bronchodilator therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Most patients with COPD respond to bronchodilators, but we have no reliable way to predict which patients will respond. When responsiveness is assessed, changes in lung volume as well as improvements in FEV1 should be considered. The combination of a beta-agonist and an anticholinergic agent produces greater improvement than either agent alone. Anticholinergic agents have few adverse side effects in patients with COPD, but concern remains about the possible cardiac side effects of beta-agonists. No clear answer exists about whether new, long-acting beta-agonists, such as salmeterol, should supplant anticholinergic agents as "first-line" therapy in COPD.