Immunohistochemical study of cell cycle regulatory proteins in intraductal breast carcinomas--a preliminary study

The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on adequate negative margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We systematically reviewed the evidence on margins in BCS for DCIS.

METHODS

A study-level meta-analysis of local recurrence (LR), microscopic margin status and threshold distance for negative margins. LR proportion was modeled using random-effects logistic meta-regression (frequentist) and network meta-analysis (Bayesian) that allows for multiple margin distances per study, adjusting for follow-up time.

RESULTS

Based on 20 studies (LR: 865 of 7883), odds of LR were associated with margin status [logistic: odds ratio (OR) 0.53 for negative vs. positive/close (p < 0.001); network: OR 0.45 for negative vs. positive]. In logistic meta-regression, relative to >0 or 1 mm, ORs for 2 mm (0.51), 3 or 5 mm (0.42) and 10 mm (0.60) showed comparable significant reductions in the odds of LR. In the network analysis, ORs relative to positive margins for 2 (0.32), 3 (0.30) and 10 mm (0.32) showed similar reductions in the odds of LR that were greater than for >0 or 1 mm (0.45). There was weak evidence of lower odds at 2 mm compared with >0 or 1 mm [relative OR (ROR) 0.72, 95 % credible interval (CrI) 0.47-1.08], and no evidence of a difference between 2 and 10 mm (ROR 0.99, 95 % CrI 0.61-1.64). Adjustment for covariates, and analyses based only on studies using whole-breast radiotherapy, did not change the findings.

CONCLUSION

Negative margins in BCS for DCIS reduce the odds of LR; however, minimum margin distances above 2 mm are not significantly associated with further reduced odds of LR in women receiving radiation.

The management of ductal carcinoma in situ: current controversies and future directions

The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased in recent decades, primarily due to the widespread implementation of breast cancer screening. Traditionally, the management of DCIS has mirrored that of invasive breast cancer, with a focus on adequate surgical excision, breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy. However, an increasing understanding of the biology of this spectrum of conditions many mean that some cases may be managed more conservatively, reserving aggressive therapies for those patients at high risk of progression to invasive disease, ultimately aiming for a personalised approach based on individual risk factors. This overview highlights the key evidence behind current practice and discusses the rationale for current and future clinical trials in DCIS.

[Does molecular biology play any role in ductal carcinoma in situ?]

The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is not fully elucidated, but it is recognized that DCIS is the true precursor of invasive carcinoma. Studies could show that DCIS is as heterogeneous as invasive ductal carcinoma, yet, they were unable to predict which DCIS will progress to invasion. Several biomarkers were also demonstrated to have a certain prognostic value. However, except for estrogen receptors and HER2, biomarkers are not yet widely used in clinical practice since their predictive value has not proven to be better than the grade and the classical classifying systems of DCIS. Identifying biomarkers for risk of invasiveness in DCIS could be of great value to help high risk patients through the management of their disease and to avoid overtreatment in low risk patients.

Biological Markers in DCIS and Risk of Breast Recurrence: A Systematic Review

Understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is currently inadequate. The aim of this comprehensive review was to identify important molecular biological markers associated with DCIS and candidate markers associated with increased risk of ipsilateral recurrence after diagnosis of DCIS. A comprehensive systematic review was performed to identify studies published in the past 10 years that investigated biological markers in DCIS. To be included in this review, studies that investigated the rate of biological expression of markers had to report on at least 30 patients; studies that analyzed the recurrence risk associated with biomarker expression had to report on at least 50 patients. There were 6,252 patients altogether in our review. Biological markers evaluated included steroid receptors, proliferation markers, cell cycle regulation and apoptotic markers, angiogenesis-related proteins, epidermal growth factor receptor family receptors, extracellular matrix-related proteins, and COX-2. Although the studies in this review provide valuable preliminary information regarding the expression and prognostic significance of biomarkers in DCIS, common limitations of published studies (case-series, cohort, and case-control studies) were that they were limited to small patient cohorts in which the extent of surgery and use of radiotherapy or endocrine therapy varied from patient to patient, and variable methods of determining biomarker expression. These constraints made it difficult to interpret the absolute effect of expression of various biomarkers on risk of local recurrence. No prospective validation studies were identified. As the study of biomarkers are in their relative infancy in DCIS compared with invasive breast cancer, key significant prognostic and predictive markers associated with invasive breast cancer have not been adequately studied in DCIS. There is a critical need for prospective analyses of novel and other known breast cancer molecular markers in large cohorts of patient with DCIS to differentiate indolent from aggressive DCIS and better tailor the need and extent of current therapies.

Alterations of the cell cycle regulators cyclin D1, cyclin A, p27, p21, p16, and pRb in apocrine metaplasia of the breast

G1/S transition defects have been a proposed requirement for tumor development. Apocrine metaplasia (APM) in the breast has been held as a sign of benignity. Yet, a number of studies have reported the presence of molecular abnormalities in some forms of APM suggesting a possible oncogenic potential for some of these lesions. We currently investigate the role of some of the cell cycle proteins, previously reported to be de-regulated in breast cancer, in an attempt to assess their significance in APM. Using immunohistochemistry, the expression of cyclin D1, cyclin A, p27, p21, p16, pRb and Ki-67 was examined in 93 cases of APM. The cases were divided into nonpapillary (NAPM) (30 cases) and papillary metaplasia (PAPM) (63 cases). PAPM was further subdivided into simple papillary (SPAPM) (29 cases), complex papillary (28 cases) and highly complex papillary (six cases). For statistical analysis, the last two groups were merged together (CPAPM). The results showed that increased histological complexity was associated with significant increase of proliferative capacity and alterations of the cell cycle control. The median Ki-67 index was 1.5% in SPAPM and 4.8% in the CPAPM. Also, alterations of the cell cycle regulators were significantly higher in the CPAPM than in the SPAPM. NAPM was generally similar to normal breast epithelium. Apocrine cells were negative for p16 while pRb was expressed in all cases. These findings suggest that in complex forms of APM, there is a considerable degree of cellular unrest. This may contribute to increased susceptibility to carcinogenesis.

COX-2 and PPARgamma expression are potential markers of recurrence risk in mammary duct carcinoma in-situ

BACKGROUND

In women with duct carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) receiving breast conservation therapy (BCT), in-breast recurrences are seen in approximately 10%, but cannot be accurately predicted using clinical and histological criteria. We performed a case-control study to identify protein markers of local recurrence risk in DCIS.

METHODS

Women treated for DCIS with BCT, who later developed in-breast recurrence (cases) were matched by age and year of treatment to women who remained free of recurrence (controls).

RESULTS

A total of 69 women were included in the study, 31 cases and 38 controls. Immunohistochemical evaluation of DCIS tissue arrays was performed for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2/neu, cyclin D1, p53, p21, cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). Two markers were significantly different between cases and controls on univariate analysis: strong COX-2 expression was associated with increased risk of recurrence, with 67% vs. 24% positivity in cases and controls p = 0.006; and nuclear expression of PPARgamma was associated with protection from recurrence with 4% vs. 27% positivity in cases and controls, p = 0.024. In a multivariate model which included size, grade, COX-2 and PPARgamma positivity, we found COX-2 positivity to be a strong independent risk factor for recurrence (OR 7.90, 95% CI 1.72-36.23)., whereas size and grade were of borderline significance. PPARgamma expression continued to demonstrate a protective trend, (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-1.84).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that COX-2 and PPARgamma should be investigated further as biologic markers to predict DCIS recurrence, particularly since they are also potential therapeutic targets.

Biological Markers Predictive of Invasive Recurrence in DCIS

DCIS is a heterogeneous group of non-invasive cancers of the breast characterized by various degrees of differentiation and unpredictable propensity for transformation into invasive carcinoma. We examined the expression and prognostic value of 9 biological markers with a potential role in tumor progression in 133 patients with pure DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery alone, between 1982–2000. Histology was reviewed and immunohistochemical staining was performed. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the associations between markers and histopathological features. Univariate and multivariate analysis examined associations between time to recurrence and clinico-pathologic features and biological markers.

Median age at diagnosis was 55 years (25–85). With a median follow up of 8.91 years, 41/133 patients recurred (21 as invasive recurrence). In this cohort 13.5% had low, 43% intermediate and 42% high nuclear grade. Comedo necrosis was found in 65% of cases. Expression of ER (62.4%), PR (55.6%), HER2/neu (31.6%), MIB1 (39.8%), p53 (22.6%), p21 (39.8%), Cyclin D1 (95.5%) calgranulin (20.5%), psoriasin (12%), was found in DCIS. HER2/neu was overexpressed in 45% that recurred as DCIS and 42.9% that recurred as invasive cancer, and only in 26.1% in cases that never recurred. On univariate analysis, HER2/neu overexpression was the only marker associated with an increased risk for any recurrence (p = 0.044). The hazard ratio for recurrence for HER2/neu positive DCIS was 1.927 (confidence interval 1.016–3.653) compared to HER2 negative DCIS. On multivariate analysis, HER2/neu overexpression remained the only independent variable significantly associated with any recurrence (p = 0.014) and with invasive recurrence (p = 0.044).

This data suggest that HER2/neu testing may become an important parameter in the management of DCIS and the treatment of cases with positive HER2/neu status could be modified accordingly, similar to the current approach for HER2/neu positive invasive disease.

p27KIP-1, cyclin A and cyclin D1 protein expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: p27KIP-1 correlates with hormone receptor status but not with local recurrence

Using whole sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material the expression of p27(KIP-1), cyclin A and cyclin D1 was examined in 60 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using routine immunohistochemistry with a median follow up of 95 months (range 10-139 months) to identify any association with disease recurrence. Fifty-six patients were treated by local excision and radiotherapy and four by mastectomy without radiotherapy. There was a highly significant positive association between p27(KIP-1) and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status (P = 0.002, P = 0.02) and with p27(KIP-1) and cyclin D1 expression (P = 0.002). A trend between cyclin A and PR status (P = 0.08) was also identified. These findings mirror those described in invasive ductal carcinoma, but there were no associations of any biomarker with histological parameters such as nuclear grade or with local recurrence on univariate analysis, which was present in four of the 56 locally excised group (7.1%). Further examination of a larger cohort may be worthwhile to explore the possible role as adjunctive predictive markers to aid clinical decision making.

Cyclin A and beta-catenin expression in actinic keratosis, Bowen's disease and invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) has been defined as a precancerous lesion or an early phase in the evolution of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and histological changes seen in the individual cells of an AK are indistinguishable from those seen in SCC, which invade the dermis. Cyclin A is an increasingly utilized proliferation marker that has functions in both S phase (DNA replication) and initiation of mitosis, whereas alterations of beta-catenin, the molecule involved in cell-cell adhesion and in signalling transduction, could promote invasive and proliferative capacities of malignant tumours.

OBJECTIVES

To determine cyclin A and beta-catenin expression pattern in cutaneous SCC and in in situ lesions classified as keratinocytic intraepidermal neoplasia (KIN) and, using traditional terms, as AK and Bowen's disease (BD), and to analyse it in relation to SCC differentiation, diameter and thickness.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 110 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples with the streptavidin-biotin technique using antibodies to cyclin A and beta-catenin. On histological examination, 53 lesions were diagnosed as AK, 16 as BD and 41 as SCC-11 well differentiated (WD), 16 moderately differentiated (MD) and 14 poorly differentiated (PD). Using KIN classification, 22 lesions were KIN1, 23 were KIN2 and 24 were KIN3. For cyclin A, distribution and labelling index (LI), and for beta-catenin, level of membranous staining and presence of aberrant (nuclear/cytoplasmic) localization were examined.

RESULTS

Diffuse cyclin A presence was observed more frequently in BD than in AK (P < 0.0001) or SCC (P = 0.0002), and in SCC-PD compared with SCC-WD (P < 0.0001) or SCC-MD (P = 0.0003). Differences between KIN3 and KIN2, as well as KIN3 and KIN1 lesions, were statistically significant (P < 0.0001), and the same result appeared when KIN1 and KIN2 cases were grouped and compared with those of KIN3 (P < 0.0001). Cyclin A LI was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in AK than in BD or SCC, but no difference between BD and SCC was found, and LI in BD was even higher than in SCC-WD or SCC-MD, while analysis regarding SCC differentiation and KIN classification revealed the same correlation as for the cyclin A distribution. Reduced or absent beta-catenin membranous staining was found in 90 cases (81.8%), more often in SCC than in AK (P = 0.03) or in AK and BD grouped together (P = 0.02). There was no statistical difference between SCCs of various level of differentiation, or between different KIN grades. Diffuse loss of membranous beta-catenin staining showed 36 lesions (32.7%), more frequently SCC than AK (P = 0.003) or AK and BD grouped (P = 0.006), as well as SCC-PD compared with SCC-WD (P = 0.01) and SCC-MD (P = 0.03), whereas all KIN comparisons remained nonsignificant. Aberrant beta-catenin cellular localization demonstrated 28 lesions (25.5%), most often in the basal or peripheral parts and in the lesions with diffuse beta-catenin loss (P = 0.009), but revealed no correlation with the histological type, SCC level of differentiation or KIN grades. Diffuse loss of membranous beta-catenin staining was found to be significantly more frequent in SCC thicker than 4 mm (P = 0.03), while all other comparisons between cyclin A or beta-catenin with the tumour size remained nonsignificant. Cyclin A LI was higher in cases with diffuse loss of membranous staining (P = 0.001) or with aberrant cellular localization of beta-catenin (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin A LI showed greater difference between AK and BD than between BD and SCC, suggesting that increased proliferation (measured by cyclin A LI) characterizes progression of in situ lesions from AK to BD, whereas reduced beta-catenin expression separates more clearly SCC from the in situ lesions. Diffuse pattern of loss of membranous beta-catenin staining correlated better with the type of lesion, SCC differentiation and tumour size than reduced expression in general or aberrant cellular localization of beta-catenin. KIN classification does not seem to be supported by our findings, except when KIN1 and KIN2 lesions (in situ, partial thickness) are grouped.

Prognostic and predictive molecular markers in DCIS: a review

Eighteen percent of all new breast cancers detected on screening mammography are ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a preinvasive lesion that is highly curable. However, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer. Because the determinants of invasive recurrence are unknown, all women with DCIS require the same treatment (usually with surgery and radiation). Therefore, there is a need to identify biologic markers and create a profile that will provide prognostic information that is more accurate than the currently used van Nuys Index to predict invasive recurrence. In the present review, we examined the many biologic markers studied in breast cancer, describe their main biologic role and their expression in DCIS, and review the various studies regarding their ability to serve as prognostic factors in breast cancer with an emphasis on predicting invasive recurrence in patients with DCIS. This review covers established markers, namely, ER, PR and HER2/neu, that are used routinely to make treatment decisions as well as investigative biologic factors involved in cell proliferation, cell cycle regulation, extracellular molecules, factors involved in extracellular matrix degradation, and angiogenesis. However, controversies exist regarding the value of these prognostic factors, their interrelationship, and their advantages over morphologic evaluation.

Immunohistochemical detection of Ki67 in breast cancer correlates with transcriptional regulation of genes related to apoptosis and cell death

Ki67 is a nuclear protein that is tightly linked to the cell cycle. It is a marker of cell proliferation and has been used to stratify good and poor prognostic categories in invasive breast cancer. Its correlation with gene expression patterns has not been fully elucidated. In this study, Ki67 immunohistochemistry using the MIB-1 antibody was performed on sections cut from 21 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded invasive breast cancers. Scoring was determined as nil (no immunostaining), low (10% or less immunopositivity) or high (>10% immunoreactive cells) respectively. The relationship of Ki67 immunohistochemical detection with clinicopathologic parameters was evaluated. Using Affymetrix U133A GeneChips, expression profiles for these tumors were generated and correlated with Ki67 immunohistochemical findings. Analysis of variance was used to define genes that were differentially regulated between the groups. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to confirm the presence of a downregulated gene. Our results showed high, low and nil Ki67 immunostaining in nine (43%), six (28.5%) and six (28.5%) invasive breast cancers respectively, with increased Ki67 protein expression correlating with high histologic grade (P=0.02), mitotic score (P=0.001) and estrogen receptor immunonegativity (P=0.002). Expression profiling trends of the Ki67 gene mirrored the observed proportions of immunostained cells when the Ki67 immunoscore was >10%. Genes related to apoptosis and cell death (bcl2, MAP2K4, TNF10) were noted to be downregulated in tumors that disclosed >40% Ki67 immunostaining (P<0.001). Downregulation of the bcl2 gene was confirmed at the RNA level by real-time RT-PCR. Differential regulation of these genes, especially bcl2, may contribute to the biological nature of clinically more aggressive and highly proliferative breast cancers.