Amifostine (WR2721) for dose escalation in marrow-ablative treatment of leukaemia

Animal models of acute myelogenous leukaemia - development, application and future perspectives

From the early inception of the transplant models through to contemporary genetic and xenograft models, evolution of murine leukaemic model systems have been critical to our general comprehension and treatment of cancer, and, more specifically, disease states such as acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML). However, even with modern advances in therapeutics and molecular diagnostics, the majority of AML patients die from their disease. Thus, in the absence of definitive in vitro models which precisely recapitulate the in vivo setting of human AMLs and failure of significant numbers of new drugs late in clinical trials, it is essential that murine AML models are developed to exploit more specific, targeted therapeutics. While various model systems are described and discussed in the literature from initial transplant models such as BNML and spontaneous murine leukaemia virus models, to the more definitive genetic and clinically significant NOD/SCID xenograft models, there exists no single compendium which directly assesses, reviews or compares the relevance of these models. Thus, the function of this article is to provide clinicians and experimentalists a chronological, comprehensive appraisal of all AML model systems, critical discussion on the elucidation of their roles in our understanding of AML and consideration to their efficacy in the development of AML chemotherapeutics.

Dose escalation of busulfan with pentoxifylline and ciprofloxacin in patients with breast cancer undergoing autologous transplants

OBJECTIVE

There is evidence that pentoxifylline (PTX) and ciprofloxacin (Cipro) may protect patients from the effects of chemotherapy and radiation, which could allow further drug dose escalation. This study was conducted to determine whether oral and intravenous (IV) PTX and Cipro permits increased dose levels of oral busulfan (BU) with a fixed dose of IV cyclophosphamide (CY) in patients with breast cancer receiving autologous or syngeneic hematopoetic cell transplantation.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients received PTX and Cipro with CY of 150 mg/kg and escalating doses of BU. The BU dosing began at 15 mg/kg, escalating in 1 mg/kg increments in groups of 4 patients. If no grade 3 or 4 regimen- related toxicities (RRT) were observed, the next 4 patients were treated at a higher dose.

RESULTS

Excessive RRT was not observed until BU 21 mg/kg was reached. Two patients at this dose level had RRTs and their BU steady-state concentration (Css) were 1,414 and 1,545 ng/ml. At a BU dose of 20 mg/kg , average BU Css 1,280 ng/ml, 0/4 had RRT. Among 10 patients who had BU Css targeted to 1,350 ng/ml, RRTs occurred in 2 (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study with PTX and Cipro, the maximum tolerated dose of BU that can be given with CY (150 mg/kg) was 20 mg/kg, a BU Css of approximately 1,300 ng/ml. A randomized trial is necessary to determine whether PTX and Cipro reduce the toxicities of this regimen.

Cytoprotection in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) therapy

Planning therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is difficult because of the heterogeneous nature of the disease and varying patient age at presentation. Cytogenetics and patient age at the time of diagnosis are two major factors determining treatment outcome in AML. Patients with poor-risk cytogenetics have much lower complete remission rates than other groups. In addition, AML in patients greater than 55 to 60 years of age often exhibits a resistant phenotype, more akin to secondary AML or AML arising from myelodysplastic syndromes. This group is also characterized by lower complete remission rates, and often requires the delivery of intensive therapy to a patient population that is the least likely to tolerate it. At the Jefferson Health System (Philadelphia, PA), we wished to develop a regimen that was maximally intensive to treat stubborn disease, but gentle enough to be given to all patients regardless of age. Toward this end, 33 patients received a maximal dose of the cytoprotective agent, amifostine, before each infusion of idarubicin in the "7 + 3" regimen, escalating the dose of idarubicin in a phase I fashion to a maximum dose of 24 mg/m2 . The data indicate that the addition of amifostine to "7 + 3" AML induction therapy enables a substantial escalation of the idarubicin dose through the 21-mg/m2 dose level, without a concomitant increase in side effects, thus providing a regimen that is both intensive and applicable to patients of all ages. Currently, phase II studies are ongoing on a national basis to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen.

The potential influence of cell protectors for dose escalation in cancer therapy: an analysis of amifostine

The attempt to increase the therapeutic ratio in an effort to improve survival or quality of life is the goal of modern cancer therapy. It is commonly accepted that local and systemic tumor control would increase if the dose intensity of antineoplastic drugs, radiation therapy, or the combination were increased. Radiation dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), accelerated or hypofractionated radiation schemes, and multidrug chemotherapy regimens are being used to try to increase tumor kill while inflicting minimal injury to normal tissue. Modern chemoradiation techniques have led to improved local regional control and increased cure rates, but the potentially severe and debilitating adverse effects of the therapies prevent them from reaching the ultimate goal of curing the disease while leaving the patient with a good quality of life. Cell protectants such as amifostine function by reducing the effects of therapy on normal cells while maintaining tumor sensitivity to the therapy. In various studies, amifostine has been analyzed and appears to be a potentially powerful adjuvant to current cancer therapy. Administering amifostine may allow dose escalation with less or equal risk to surrounding normal tissues. This could improve therapeutic efficacy, survival, and quality of life for cancer patients.

Autologous stem cell transplantation and purging in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

The prognosis for adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is poor. Only 20-30% of patients will be cured with conventional chemotherapy. Haematopoietic progenitor transplantation is thus an attractive option in these patients. Even if allogeneic transplantation allows a better control of the disease, autologous transplantation remains an important alternative for patients lacking a suitable donor or when allogeneic transplants imply excessive risk. Relapse is the main drawback of autologous transplants, but many strategies are being explored to overcome this problem. We focus here on transplant modality, the source of haematopoietic progenitors, and the best timing to apply the procedure. Also reviewed are the current situation and future strategies for improving results in this setting, such as ex vivo purging; immunotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy.

Bone marrow stem cell protection from chemotherapy by low--molecular-weight compounds

The stem cells of the bone marrow have the capacity for both self-renewal and derivation of all the blood cell lineages. Consequently, toxicity to these cells can result in neutropenia, agranulocytosis, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, or aplastic anemia. Many anticancer drugs adversely affect the bone marrow, and neutropenia is a common limiting factor in dose escalation. In this review, we discuss agents that appear to have potential as bone marrow sparing agents. Computerized catalogs of the National Library of Medicine and Medline were searched for reports on low-molecular-weight compounds that detailed effects on the hematopoietic progenitor cells. The most promising agents are the endogenous peptides p-glutamic acid-glutamic acid-aspartic acid-cysteine-lysine and acetyl-serine-aspartic acid-lysine-proline, and the exogenous compounds amifostine and ammonium trichloro[dioxoethylene-O,O']tellurate, but several others are also discussed. These compounds preserve stem cell function in the presence of antineoplastic drugs of diverse pharmacological classes, and they do so by various mechanisms of action. Their present status in clinical practice is also detailed. More needs to be learned about their mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential, but the results are encouraging for some of these compounds and more clinical trials should be expected.