1
|
Grigorie TR, Potlog G, Alexandrescu ST. Lynch Syndrome-Impact of the Type of Deficient Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation on Diagnosis, Clinical Presentation, Surveillance and Therapeutic Approaches. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2025; 61:120. [PMID: 39859102 PMCID: PMC11766940 DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Revised: 01/10/2025] [Accepted: 01/12/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
In today's world, with its continuing advancements in genetics, the identification of Lynch syndrome (LS) increasingly relies on sophisticated genetic testing techniques. Most guidelines recommend a tailored surveillance program, as well as personalized prophylactic and therapeutic approaches, according to the type of dMMR gene mutation. Carriers of path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 genes have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), despite intensive colonoscopic surveillance. Conversely, carriers of path_MSH6 and path_PMS2 genes have a lower risk of developing CRC, which may be due to their lower penetrance and later age of onset. Thus, carriers of path_MLH1 or path_MSH2 would theoretically derive greater benefits from total colectomy, compared to low-risk carriers (path_MSH6 and path_PMS2), in which colonoscopic surveillance might achieve an efficient prophylaxis. Furthermore, regarding the risk of endometrial/ovarian cancer development, there is a global agreement to offer both hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to path_MLH1, path_MSH2 and path_MSH6 carriers after the age of 40. In patients with CRC, preoperative knowledge of the diagnosis of LS is of tremendous importance, due to the high risk of metachronous CRC. However, this risk depends on the type of dMMR gene mutation. For carriers of the high-risk variants (MLH1, MSH2 and EPCAM) who have already developed colon cancer, it is strongly recommended a subtotal or total colectomy is performed, while partial colectomy followed by endoscopic surveillance is an appropriate management approach to treat colon cancer in carriers of the low-risk variants (MSH6 and PMS2). On the other hand, extended surgery for index rectal cancer (such as total proctocolectomy) is less effective than extended surgery for index colon cancer from the point of view of metachronous CRC risk reduction, and is associated with a decreased quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tudor Razvan Grigorie
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery, Emergency University Hospital Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 169, Sector 5, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gheorghe Potlog
- Center for Digestive Diseases and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Sorin Tiberiu Alexandrescu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery, Emergency University Hospital Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 169, Sector 5, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohapatra SS, Batra SK, Bharadwaj S, Bouvet M, Cosman B, Goel A, Jogunoori W, Kelley MJ, Mishra L, Mishra B, Mohapatra S, Patel B, Pisegna JR, Raufman JP, Rao S, Roy H, Scheuner M, Singh S, Vidyarthi G, White J. Precision Medicine for CRC Patients in the Veteran Population: State-of-the-Art, Challenges and Research Directions. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63:1123-1138. [PMID: 29572615 PMCID: PMC5895694 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5000-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for ~9% of all cancers in the Veteran population, a fact which has focused a great deal of the attention of the VA's research and development efforts. A field-based meeting of CRC experts was convened to discuss both challenges and opportunities in precision medicine for CRC. This group, designated as the VA Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium (VA4C), discussed advances in CRC biology, biomarkers, and imaging for early detection and prevention. There was also a discussion of precision treatment involving fluorescence-guided surgery, targeted chemotherapies and immunotherapies, and personalized cancer treatment approaches. The overarching goal was to identify modalities that might ultimately lead to personalized cancer diagnosis and treatment. This review summarizes the findings of this VA field-based meeting, in which much of the current knowledge on CRC prescreening and treatment was discussed. It was concluded that there is a need and an opportunity to identify new targets for both the prevention of CRC and the development of effective therapies for advanced disease. Also, developing methods integrating genomic testing with tumoroid-based clinical drug response might lead to more accurate diagnosis and prognostication and more effective personalized treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyam S. Mohapatra
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL USA
- Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA
- College of Pharmacy Graduate Programs, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA
| | - Surinder K. Batra
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE USA
| | - Srinivas Bharadwaj
- Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA
| | - Michael Bouvet
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA USA
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Bard Cosman
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA USA
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Ajay Goel
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Research, Center for Translational Genomics and Oncology, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA
- Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX USA
| | - Wilma Jogunoori
- Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC USA
- Department of Surgery, Center for Translational Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
| | - Michael J. Kelley
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- National Oncology Program Office, Specialty Care Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
| | - Lopa Mishra
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC USA
- Department of Surgery, Center for Translational Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
| | - Bibhuti Mishra
- Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC USA
- Department of Surgery, Center for Translational Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
| | - Subhra Mohapatra
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL USA
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA
| | - Bhaumik Patel
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA USA
| | - Joseph R. Pisegna
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Human Genetics, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Jean-Pierre Raufman
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- VA Maryland Health Care System, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Shuyun Rao
- Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC USA
- Department of Surgery, Center for Translational Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
| | - Hemant Roy
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Maren Scheuner
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Human Genetics, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Satish Singh
- Department of Veterans Affairs Colorectal Cancer Cell-genomics Consortium [VA4C], Tampa, FL USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System and Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Gitanjali Vidyarthi
- James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL USA
- Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA
| | - Jon White
- Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC USA
- Department of Surgery, Center for Translational Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Luiken GA, Talamini MA, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M. Fluorescently labeled chimeric anti-CEA antibody improves detection and resection of human colon cancer in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude mouse model. J Surg Oncol 2014; 109:451-8. [PMID: 24249594 PMCID: PMC3962702 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2013] [Accepted: 10/29/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate a new fluorescently labeled chimeric anti-CEA antibody for improved detection and resection of colon cancer. METHODS Frozen tumor and normal human tissue samples were stained with chimeric and mouse antibody-fluorophore conjugates for comparison. Mice with patient-derived orthotopic xenografts (PDOX) of colon cancer underwent fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) or bright-light surgery (BLS) 24 hr after tail vein injection of fluorophore-conjugated chimeric anti-CEA antibody. Resection completeness was assessed using postoperative images. Mice were followed for 6 months for recurrence. RESULTS The fluorophore conjugation efficiency (dye/mole ratio) improved from 3-4 to >5.5 with the chimeric CEA antibody compared to mouse anti-CEA antibody. CEA-expressing tumors labeled with chimeric CEA antibody provided a brighter fluorescence signal on frozen human tumor tissues (P = 0.046) and demonstrated consistently lower fluorescence signals in normal human tissues compared to mouse antibody. Chimeric CEA antibody accurately labeled PDOX colon cancer in nude mice, enabling improved detection of tumor margins for more effective FGS. The R0 resection rate increased from 86% to 96% with FGS compared to BLS. CONCLUSION Improved conjugating efficiency and labeling with chimeric fluorophore-conjugated antibody resulted in better detection and resection of human colon cancer in an orthotopic mouse model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Robert M. Hoffman
- University of California San Diego, Department of Surgery
- AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego
| | - Michael Bouvet
- University of California San Diego, Department of Surgery
- San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Metildi CA, Zhang Y, Uehara F, Miwa S, Yano S, Sato S, Murakami T, Momiyama M, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Bouvet M, Endo I, Hoffman RM. Successful fluorescence-guided surgery on human colon cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse models using a fluorophore-conjugated anti-CEA antibody and a portable imaging system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014; 24:241-7. [PMID: 24494971 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) can enable successful cancer surgery where bright-light surgery often cannot. There are three important issues for FGS going forward toward the clinic: (a) proper tumor labeling, (b) a simple portable imaging system for the operating room, and (c) patient-like mouse models in which to develop the technology. The present report addresses all three. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient colon tumors were initially established subcutaneously in nonobese diabetic (NOD)/severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) mice immediately after surgery. The tumors were then harvested from NOD/SCID mice and passed orthotopically in nude mice to make patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) models. Eight weeks after orthotopic implantation, a monoclonal anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody conjugated with AlexaFluor 488 (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR) was delivered to the PDOX models as a single intravenous dose 24 hours before laparotomy. A hand-held portable fluorescence imaging device was used. RESULTS The primary tumor was clearly visible at laparotomy with the portable fluorescence imaging system. Frozen section microscopy of the resected specimen demonstrated that the anti-CEA antibody selectively labeled cancer cells in the colon cancer PDOX. The tumor was completely resected under fluorescence navigation. Histologic evaluation of the resected specimen demonstrated that cancer cells were not present in the margins, indicating successful tumor resection. The FGS animals remained tumor free for over 6 months. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present report indicate that FGS using a fluorophore-conjugated anti-CEA antibody and portable imaging system improves efficacy of resection for CEA-positive colorectal cancer. These data provide the basis for clinical trials.
Collapse
|
5
|
Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Snyder CS, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M. Fluorescence-guided surgery of human colon cancer increases complete resection resulting in cures in an orthotopic nude mouse model. J Surg Res 2012; 179:87-93. [PMID: 23079571 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2012] [Revised: 08/15/2012] [Accepted: 08/24/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We inquired if fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) could improve surgical outcomes in fluorescent orthotopic nude mouse models of human colon cancer. METHODS We established fluorescent orthotopic mouse models of human colon cancer expressing a fluorescent protein. Tumors were resected under bright light surgery (BLS) or FGS. Pre- and post-operative images with the OV-100 Small Animal Imaging System (Olympus Corp, Tokyo Japan) were obtained to assess the extent of surgical resection. RESULTS All mice with primary tumor that had undergone FGS had complete resection compared with 58% of mice in the BLS group (P = 0.001). FGS resulted in decreased recurrence compared with BLS (33% versus 62%, P = 0.049) and lengthened disease-free median survival from 9 to >36 wk. The median overall survival increased from 16 wk in the BLS group to 31 weeks in the FGS group. FGS resulted in a cure in 67% of mice (alive without evidence of tumor at >6 mo after surgery) compared with only 37% of mice that underwent BLS (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Surgical outcomes in orthotopic nude mouse models of human colon cancer were significantly improved with FGS. The present study can be translated to the clinic by various effective methods of fluorescently labeling tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina A Metildi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093-0987, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Costa SRP, Antunes RCP, Paula RPD, Pedroso MÂ, Farah JFDM, Lupinacci RA. A exenteração pélvica no tratamento do câncer de reto estádio T4: experiência de 15 casos operados. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2007; 44:284-8. [DOI: 10.1590/s0004-28032007000400002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2006] [Accepted: 06/08/2007] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
RACIONAL: A exenteração pélvica tem sido a melhor opção terapêutica radical para o tratamento dos tumores de reto T4. No entanto, essa operação ainda permanece com mortalidade significante e alta morbidade. OBJETIVO: Relatar série de 15 casos de exenteração pélvica para tumores de reto T4, analisando a morbidade, mortalidade e sobrevida dos pacientes. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 15 pacientes com câncer de reto T4 no Serviço de Cirurgia Geral - Oncocirurgia do Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual de São Paulo, SP, submetidos a exenteração pélvica no período de 1998 e 2006. Sete eram do sexo masculino enquanto oito eram do sexo feminino, com média de idade de 65 anos. Todos apresentavam sintomas incapacitantes. As operações foram: exenteração infra-elevadora (n = 6), exenteração supra-elevadora (n = 4), exenteração posterior (n = 3) e exenteração posterior com cistectomia e ureterectomia parciais (n = 2). RESULTADOS: A média de tempo cirúrgico foi de 403 minutos (280-485). A média de sangramento foi de 1620 mL (300-4800). A mortalidade pós-operatória foi de 6,66% (n = 1). A morbidade pós-operatória foi de 53,3% (n = 8). Os exames histológicos evidenciaram que todas as ressecções foram R0. Envolvimento linfonodal foi observado em quatro pacientes (26,66 %) sendo que todos faleceram em decorrência da neoplasia. A sobrevida global em cinco anos foi de 35,7%. CONCLUSÃO: A exenteração pélvica ainda apresenta alta morbidade, no entanto permanece justificada, pois pode conferir maior controle do câncer de reto T4 em longo prazo.
Collapse
|