Why are rod-shaped bacteria rod shaped?

Internal pressure-induced formation of hemispherical poles in Bacillus subtilis

The cell of a rod-shaped bacterium is composed of a cylinder and two hemispherical poles. In recent decades, the molecular mechanism of morphogenesis in rod-shaped bacteria has received extensive research. However, most works have focused on the morphogenesis of cylinders, and the morphogenesis of the hemispherical poles remains unclear. In the past, the pole of bacterial cell wall was considered as a rigid hemispherical structure. However, our work indicated that the pole in the isolated sacculi from Bacillus subtilis was a flat structure instead of a hemisphere form. Further works showed that internal pressure was responsible for shaping the hemispherical poles, indicating an elastic nature of the cell wall in poles. In addition, we found that the internal pressure was able to transform septa into hemispherical shape which is similar to normal poles. Based on our work, we proposed a model for the internal pressure-induced formation of hemispherical poles in B. subtilis, and this work may provide new clues into basic knowledge of the morphogenesis of rod-shaped bacteria.

Mechanical consequences of cell-wall turnover in the elongation of a Gram-positive bacterium

A common feature of walled organisms is their exposure to osmotic forces that challenge the mechanical integrity of cells while driving elongation. Most bacteria rely on their cell wall to bear osmotic stress and determine cell shape. Wall thickness can vary greatly among species, with Gram-positive bacteria having a thicker wall than Gram-negative bacteria. How wall dimensions and mechanical properties are regulated and how they affect growth have not yet been elucidated. To investigate the regulation of wall thickness in the rod-shaped Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis, we analyzed exponentially growing cells in different media. Using transmission electron and epifluorescence microscopy, we found that wall thickness and strain were maintained even between media that yielded a threefold change in growth rate. To probe mechanisms of elongation, we developed a biophysical model of the Gram-positive wall that balances the mechanical effects of synthesis of new material and removal of old material through hydrolysis. Our results suggest that cells can vary their growth rate without changing wall thickness or strain by maintaining a constant ratio of synthesis and hydrolysis rates. Our model also indicates that steady growth requires wall turnover on the same timescale as elongation, which can be driven primarily by hydrolysis rather than insertion. This perspective of turnover-driven elongation provides mechanistic insight into previous experiments involving mutants whose growth rate was accelerated by the addition of lysozyme or autolysin. Our approach provides a general framework for deconstructing shape maintenance in cells with thick walls by integrating wall mechanics with the kinetics and regulation of synthesis and turnover.

From models to pathogens: how much have we learned about Streptococcus pneumoniae cell division?

Streptococcus pneumoniae is an oval-shaped Gram-positive coccus that lives in intimate association with its human host, both as a commensal and pathogen. The seriousness of pneumococcal infections and the spread of multi-drug resistant strains call for new lines of intervention. Bacterial cell division is an attractive target to develop antimicrobial drugs. This review discusses the recent advances in understanding S. pneumoniae growth and division, in comparison with the best studied rod-shaped models, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. To maintain their shape, these bacteria propagate by peripheral and septal peptidoglycan synthesis, involving proteins that assemble into distinct complexes called the elongasome and the divisome, respectively. Many of these proteins are conserved in S. pneumoniae, supporting the notion that the ovococcal shape is also achieved by rounds of elongation and division. Importantly, S. pneumoniae and close relatives with similar morphology differ in several aspects from the model rods. Overall, the data support a model in which a single large machinery, containing both the peripheral and septal peptidoglycan synthesis complexes, assembles at midcell and governs growth and division. The mechanisms generating the ovococcal or coccal shape in lactic-acid bacteria have likely evolved by gene reduction from a rod-shaped ancestor of the same group.

Shapes thatEscherichia coliCells Can Achieve, as a Paradigm for Other Bacteria

Because the sacculi of Gram-negative rod-shaped cells are so thin, it is difficult to imagine how they grow and divide and maintain a characteristic shape and size. Abnormal cell shapes can be produced, under special conditions in Escherichia coli. These findings suggest a basis for the variety of bacterial shapes in terms of the Surface Stress Theory. Some proposals are presented to understand the form and function of rods, cocci, fusiform organisms, as well as other bacteria of other shapes using the molecular biology and physiology now known for E. coli.

The Exocytoskeleton

The murein or peptidoglycan wall enclosing most bacteria is essential for the life style of most organisms in the Domain of Bacteria. Only in special situations does it not play a role in the bacterial growth cycle. When life first appeared on this planet the cellular osmotic pressure was probably low and a sacculus was probably not relevant, but became necessary as bacterial life evolved from the complex and sophisticated cell called the Last Universal Ancestor. The construction of the murein wall outside of the cytoplasmic membrane is complex and requires elaborate special biochemistry. Growth of the sacculus in some parts of the surface and not in others is important for bacteria cells and allows them to divide and grow without becoming larger and larger and for their being able to maintain a shape characteristic of individual species.

Bacterial wall as target for attack: past, present, and future research

When Bacteria, Archaea, and Eucarya separated from each other, a great deal of evolution had taken place. Only then did extensive diversity arise. The bacteria split off with the new property that they had a sacculus that protected them from their own turgor pressure. The saccular wall of murein (or peptidoglycan) was an effective solution to the osmotic pressure problem, but it then was a target for other life-forms, which created lysoymes and beta-lactams. The beta-lactams, with their four-member strained rings, are effective agents in nature and became the first antibiotic in human medicine. But that is by no means the end of the story. Over evolutionary time, bacteria challenged by beta-lactams evolved countermeasures such as beta-lactamases, and the producing organisms evolved variant beta-lactams. The biology of both classes became evident as the pharmaceutical industry isolated, modified, and produced new chemotherapeutic agents and as the properties of beta-lactams and beta-lactamases were examined by molecular techniques. This review attempts to fit the wall biology of current microbes and their clinical context into the way organisms developed on this planet as well as the changes arising since the work done by Fleming. It also outlines the scientific advances in our understanding of this broad area of biology.

Were Gram-positive rods the first bacteria?

At some point in the evolution of life, the domain Bacteria arose from prokaryotic progenitors. The cell that gave rise to the first bacterium has been given the name (among several other names) "last universal ancestor (LUA)". This cell had an extensive, well-developed suite of biochemical strategies that increased its ability to grow. The first bacterium is thought to have acquired a covering, called a sacculus or exoskeleton, that made it stress-resistant. This protected it from rupturing as a result of turgor pressure stress arising from the success of its metabolic abilities. So what were the properties of this cell's wall? Was it Gram-positive or Gram-negative? And was it a coccus or a rod?