A tailored surgical approach for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the Nottingham experience

Transthoracic fundoplication using the Belsey Mark IV technique versus Nissen fundoplication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nissen fundoplication is considered the cornerstone surgical treatment for hiatal hernia repair. Belsey Mark IV (BMIV) transthoracic fundoplication is an alternative approach that is rarely utilized in today's minimally invasive era. This study aims to summarize the safety and efficacy of BMIV and to compare it with Nissen fundoplication.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for single arm and comparative studies published by March 31st, 2022, according to PRISMA statement. Inverse-variance weights were used to estimate the proportion of patients experiencing the studied outcome and random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

17 studies were identified, incorporating 2136 and 638 patients that underwent Belsey Mark IV or Nissen fundoplication, respectively. A total of 13.8% (95% CI: 9.6-18.6) of the patients that underwent fundoplication with the BMIV technique had non-resolution of their symptoms and 3.5% (95% CI: 2.0-5.4) required a reoperation. Overall, 14.8% (95% CI: 9.5-20.1) of the BMIV arm patients experienced post-operative complications, 5.0% (95% CI: 2.0-9.0) experienced chronic postoperative pain and 6.9% (95% CI: 3.1-11.9) had a hernia recurrence. No statistically significant difference was observed between Belsey Mark IV and Nissen fundoplication in terms of post-interventional non-resolution of symptoms (odds ratio [OR]: 1.49 [95% Confidence Interval (95%CI):0.6-4.0]; p = 0.42), post-operative complications (OR:0.83, 95%CI: 0.5-1.5, p = 0.54) and in-hospital mortality (OR:0.69, 95%CI: 0.13-3.80, p = 0.67). Belsey Mark IV arm had significantly lower reoperation rates compared to Nissen arm (OR:0.28, 95%CI: 0.1-0.7, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

BMIV fundoplication is a safe and effective but technically challenging. The BMIV technique may offer benefits to patients compared to the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. These benefits, however, are challenged by the increased morbidity of a thoracotomy.

Surgeon specialty does not influence outcomes of hiatal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia repair is commonly performed by both general and thoracic surgeons. The present study examined differences in approach, setting, and outcomes by specialty for hiatal hernia repair.

METHODS

Adults undergoing hiatal hernia repair were identified in the 2012-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients were grouped by specialty of the operating surgeon (thoracic surgery vs general surgery). Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the effect of specialty on mortality, major morbidity, and 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

Among 46,739 patients, 5.0% were operated on by thoracic surgery. General surgery operated on younger patients (44.7 years vs 47.0, P < .001) with lesser systemic illness (American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3 50.4% vs 54.8%, P < .001) compared to thoracic surgery. General surgery more commonly used laparoscopy (95.0% vs 82.6%) and less commonly used thoracic approaches than thoracic surgery (0.6% vs 8.5%, P < .001). From 2012 to 2019, the proportion of cases performed as an outpatient by general surgery increased (28.1% to 46.4%, P < .001), but it remained stable for thoracic surgery (0.1% to 0.7%, P = .10). After risk adjustment, thoracic surgery specialty was not associated with mortality (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.5-1.5), major morbidity (0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.7-1.1), or readmission (0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.1). Rather, factors including surgical approach (laparotomy 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4-1.9; thoracoscopy/thoracotomy 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5-2.7), inpatient case status (2.4, 95% confidence interval 2.2-2.7), increasing ASA class, and functional status more strongly influenced major morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Operative factors, surgical approach, and patient comorbidities more strongly influence outcomes of hiatal hernia repair than does surgeon specialty, suggesting continued safety of hiatal hernia repair by both thoracic and general surgeons.

The Belsey Mark IV: an operation with an enduring role in the management of complicated hiatal hernia

BACKGROUND

The Belsey Mark IV operation has been used for the management of hiatal hernia for over 40 years, but with the introduction of laparoscopic techniques its role has become questionable. To determine the current role of this procedure we present a contemporary series of patients.

METHODS

We reviewed fifteen consecutive patients, mean age of 63 years, who underwent a Belsey Mark IV fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux in the presence of a hiatal hernia in our Department from January 2005 to March 2011. Indications for the thoracic approach included paraesophageal hernias, recurrent hiatal hernias and previous upper abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. Immediate postoperative morbidity included 1 case of bleeding, 1 case of pneumonia and 1 case of atrial fibrillation. The mean length of stay was 5.9 days. After a mean follow-up time of 49 months, all patients reported total or partial alleviation of their symptoms. No hernia recurrence was detected during barium swallow examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The Belsey approach is a procedure that can be useful as an alternative in selected cases when there are co-morbidities complicating the transabdominal (laparoscopic) approach.

Transhiatal esophagectomy in the profoundly obese: implications and experience

BACKGROUND

Historically, obesity contraindicated an abdominal approach to the esophagogastric junction. The technique of transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) evolved without specific regard to body habitus. The dramatic increase in obese patients requiring an esophagectomy for complications of reflux disease prompted this evaluation of the impact of obesity on the outcomes of esophagectomy to determine whether profound obesity should contraindicate the transhiatal approach.

METHODS

We used our Esophagectomy Database to identify 133 profoundly obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > or = 35 kg/m2) from among 2176 undergoing a THE from 1977 to 2006. This group was matched to a randomly selected, non-obese (BMI, 18.5 to 30 kg/m2) control population of 133 patients. Intraoperative, postoperative, and long-term follow-up results were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

Profoundly obese patients had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss (mean, 492.2 mL versus 361.8 mL, p = 0.001), need for partial sternotomy (18 versus 3, p = 0.001), and frequency of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (6 versus 0, p = 0.04). The two groups did not differ significantly in the occurrence of chylothorax, wound infection, or dehiscence rate; length of hospital stay or need for intensive care unit stay; or hospital or operative mortality. Follow-up results for dysphagia, dumping, regurgitation, and overall functional score were also comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With appropriate instrumentation, transhiatal esophagectomy in obese patients has similar morbidity and outcomes as in non-obese patients. Obesity, even when profound, does not contraindicate a transhiatal esophagectomy.

Technical Controversies in Fundoplication Surgery

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common health problem affecting more than 50% of the population. For those who experience more than occasional symptoms, GERD has a profound effect on their quality of life. With the advent of laparoscopic surgery, fundoplication has been used to treat GERD. Fundoplication also is used in the surgical management of paraesophageal hernias. Technical controversies are addressed in this article, including open versus laparoscopic approaches, the choice of complete (360 degres) or partial fundoplication, whether or not a gastroplasty is required, and the use of prosthetic materials in crural repair.

Effectiveness of esophageal manometry in predicting the outcome of children with primary GER after floppy Nissen-Rossetti wrap

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) can result in many postoperative problems because of an incorrect indication or an unsuitable fundoplication. Many preoperative tests have been suggested to perform a "tailored fundoplication," but there is no clear evidence as to which is the best. The aim of our study was to define the effectiveness of esophageal manometry in predicting the outcome of children who need fundoplication because of refractory primary gastroesophageal reflux.

METHODS

Thirty-two children were included in the study. Patients with gastroenterologic and respiratory symptoms numbered 10 (31%) and 22 (69%), respectively. The preoperative motility pattern was (1) inappropriate relaxations alone in nine patients (28%) and associated with esophageal body dysmotility in one patients (3%); (2) low-pressure lower esophageal sphincter (LES), alone in 13 patients (41%) and associated with body dysmotility in eight (25%). Motility pattern of the esophageal body was abnormal in nine children. Manometric anomalies were absent only in one case.

RESULTS

Low pressure of the LES associated with atypical esophageal motility disorders was significantly higher in the gastroenterological group and in the older patients. Low pressure of the LES associated with good esophageal activity was significantly higher in the respiratory group and in the patients younger than 24 months. There was no correlation between motility pattern and outcome, and no statistically significant differences were found between pressure values at the different levels and symptoms, outcome, and age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal manometry is not mandatory to predict the outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication for refractory primary GER treatment.