Pleural lavage cytology in esophageal cancer without pleural effusions: clinicopathologic analysis

Collection and processing of effusion fluids for cytopathologic evaluation

Accumulation of fluid in serous cavities as effusions may have to be drained for therapeutic and diagnostic indications. As compared to many other procedures, the technicality of paracentesis procedures is relatively easy. As a result, effusion fluids comprise a significant proportion of specimens in most of the laboratories, including those in community settings.

Because of relative complexities in the cytopathologic evaluation of effusion fluids, application of appropriately standardized protocol is critical for achieving optimum results by applying standardized steps from handling of specimens during the initial stages of collection to the final interpretation phase. Understanding various limitations and challenges during collection and processing phases by all the personnel involved, including clinicians, pathologists, and technologists is critical for optimum diagnostic yield.

This review highlights various cytopreparatory techniques applicable to effusion cytology in one place. It is organized by projecting the details predominantly in the form of different tables and figures including summary of the recommended protocols with reagents and stains used. Also included is a sample of cytopathology report based on the approach discussed in this series.

Introduction to the second edition of 'Diagnostic Cytopathology of Serous Fluids' as CytoJournal Monograph (CMAS) in Open Access

Serous fluids are excessive accumulation of fluids in a serous cavity as effusion. However, traditionally this area also covers cytopathologic evaluation of washings of these cavities including pelvic/peritoneal washing. This is the introductory review article in series on this topic with the application of simplified algorithmic approaches. The series would be compiled finally as a book after minor modifications of individual review articles to accommodate the book layout on the topic as second edition of 'Diagnostic Cytopathology of Serous Fluids' book. The approach is primarily directed towards detection of neoplastic cells based on morphology alone or with the help of various ancillary tests, including commonly applied immunocytochemistry to be interpreted as second foreign population with application of SCIP (subtractive coordinate immunoreactivity pattern) approach in effusion fluid tapings. As the role of molecular pathology tests is increasing, this component as ancillary testing will also be covered as applicable. Because a picture and sketches are worth a thousand words, illustrations and figures are included generously even at the risk of moderate repetition. The clinically important serous cavities include peritoneal cavity, pericardial cavity, and two pleural cavities. The primary topic of this series is specimens from these cavities as effusion fluids and washings including cytopathologic evaluation of peritoneal/pelvic washing. It is expected that some readers may not read the entire series or the final book from beginning to end, but refer to the individual review articles and chapters sporadically during their clinical practice. Considering this practical limitation, some brief repetition may be observed throughout the book. Some of the important themes will be highlighted as italicized and bolded text for quick reference. Dedicated articles/chapters are assigned for technical and other reference material as appendices. Tables, algorithms, sketches, and combination of pictures are included generously for quick reference. Most of the illustrations are attempted to be labeled appropriately with arrows and other indicators to avoid equivocation, especially for beginners in the field. This introductory review article describes general details under the following three broad headings: Histology and general cytology of serous cavity lining Effusion (general considerations) Ancillary techniques in brief.

Serosal involvement in gastrointestinal cancer: its assessment and significance

There is an increasing burden upon diagnostic histopathologists to identify accurately factors of prognostic and therapeutic implication in gastrointestinal cancer. It is perhaps partly because of the use of rigid sequential staging systems, such as the Dukes' classification, that some factors, perhaps most notably involvement of surgical margins (especially in rectal cancer) and serosal involvement (particularly in oesophageal, colonic and rectal cancer), have been relatively neglected until more recently. This is surprising and concerning because both of these pathologically derived parameters strongly correlate with subsequent locoregional recurrence and, ultimately, with prognosis. Whilst the occurrence and significance of serosal involvement have been well recognized in gastric cancer for many years, relatively little attention has been paid to the phenomenon in oesophageal cancer and yet both pleural and peritoneal involvement may be comparatively commonly identified in oesophageal cancer. Serosal involvement and transperitoneal spread are also of considerable prognostic importance in primary appendiceal carcinoma. Only more recently has the significance of serosal involvement been appreciated in colonic and rectal cancer. In the colon, the phenomenon is now recognized to be one of the most important factors in predicting transperitoneal spread and overall prognosis. Furthermore, there is increasing interest in alternative novel strategies, including intraperitoneal chemotherapy and radical peritoneal surgery, as legitimate therapeutic options in many gastrointestinal cancers.

Clinical significance of micrometastasis in lung and esophageal cancer: a new paradigm in thoracic oncology

In the past decade, detection of micrometastatic disease in different clinical samples including pleural lavage, lymph node, bone marrow, and blood has become a rapidly growing area of interest in research of non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer. The results of these studies support the concept that, just as in many other solid malignancies, systemic spread may happen at an early stage in non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer. Such systemic spread is often occult (micrometastases) at the time of primary diagnosis, which may have adverse effects on survival. Improved staging can be expected with information on micrometastases, and a subgroup of patients who will benefit most from adjuvant therapy might be identified. Although reliable and standard methods need to be developed before detection of micrometastasis is incorporated in the routine clinical practice, we suggest that it be considered an important correlate in clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer.

Peritoneal washings are not predictive of occult peritoneal disease in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of peritoneal cytology provides valuable staging information in patients with gastric and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but its usefulness in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of peritoneal cytology in patients with potentially resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. This study evaluated a possible association between positive peritoneal cytology and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, which is commonly used in these patients and may result in peritoneal biliary leakage and peritoneal seeding.

STUDY DESIGN

From October 1997 through June 2000 26 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent staging laparoscopy immediately before planned open exploration and resection. Peritoneal washings were obtained during laparoscopic examination before any biopsies were taken. Cytologic analysis was performed using the Papanicolau technique.

RESULTS

There were 18 men and 8 women, with a median age of 69 years (range 42 to 81 years). The most common presenting symptom was jaundice (n = 19). Previous biliary drainage was performed in 23 patients: 9 percutaneous and 14 endoscopic. Metastatic disease was suspected preoperatively in six patients, three to the liver, two to the peritoneum, and one to regional lymph nodes, all of which were confirmed at laparoscopy. Laparoscopy identified five additional patients with metastatic disease. Peritoneal cytology was positive for malignant cells in two patients, both of whom had gross peritoneal metastases. Nine other patients had metastatic disease to distant sites within the abdomen, but none had positive cytology. Overall, six patients had metastatic disease to the peritoneal cavity, only one of whom had undergone earlier percutaneous biliary drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal cytology was not predictive of occult metastatic disease. Laparoscopic staging identified some patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma, but analysis of peritoneal cytology provided no additional information. There was no association between percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and peritoneal tumor seeding.

Does pleural lavage cytology before thoracic closure predict both patient's prognosis and site of cancer recurrence after resection of esophageal cancer?

BACKGROUND

Operative manipulation occasionally exfoliates and spreads cancer cells in the surgical field, and it is a matter of concern whether the exfoliated cancer cells actually affect the patient's prognosis and sites of cancer recurrence.

METHODS

In 240 patients with esophageal cancers, lavage cytology (LC) of the right pleural cavity was performed before and after esophageal resection combined with regional lymphadenectomy. The cytologic results were compared with the pathologic factors associated with cancer extension, postoperative survival, and cause of surgical failure.

RESULTS

Only 3 patients (1.3%) were LC positive before resection. Of the 237 LC-negative patients, LC was also negative after resection in 215 patients (90.7%) (LC-/-), but LC became positive after resection in 22 patients (9.3%) (LC-/+). The 3-year survival rate was 0% in the LC-/+ group versus 65% in the LC-/- group, and the median survival rates were 10.9 months and 25.0 months, respectively (P <.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that LC-/+ was an independent prognostic factor (P =.0331), along with nodal involvement and depth of cancer invasion. However, there were no significant differences in the sites of cancer recurrence between the 2 groups. Only 1 patient was found to develop the first recurrence in the pleural cavity. The LC-/+ group had a higher incidence of bulky lymph-node metastasis (P =.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

Pleural LC after resection of esophageal cancer seems to be a prognostic indicator of overall recurrence, but not necessarily in the pleural cavity. Patients with a positive LC after resection may benefit most by effective systemic adjuvant chemotherapy.