Ischemic preconditioning improves preservation with cold blood cardioplegia in valve replacement patients

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting (with or without valve surgery)

BACKGROUND

Despite substantial improvements in myocardial preservation strategies, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still associated with severe complications. It has been reported that remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces reperfusion injury in people undergoing cardiac surgery and improves clinical outcome. However, there is a lack of synthesised information and a need to review the current evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of remote ischaemic preconditioning in people undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with or without valve surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

In May 2016 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science. We also conducted a search of ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We also checked reference lists of included studies. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs in which people scheduled for CABG (with or without valve surgery) were randomly assigned to receive RIPC or sham intervention before surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We calculated mean differences (MDs), standardised mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RR) using a random-effects model. We assessed quality of the trial evidence for all primary outcomes using the GRADE methodology. We completed a 'Risk of bias' assessment for all studies and performed sensitivity analysis by excluding studies judged at high or unclear risk of bias for sequence generation, allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data. We contacted authors for missing data. Our primary endpoints were 1) composite endpoint (including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction or any new stroke, or both) assessed at 30 days after surgery, 2) cardiac troponin T (cTnT, ng/L) at 48 hours and 72 hours, and as area under the curve (AUC) 72 hours (µg/L) after surgery, and 3) cardiac troponin I (cTnI, ng/L) at 48 hours, 72 hours, and as area under the curve (AUC) 72 hours (µg/L) after surgery.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 29 studies involving 5392 participants (mean age = 64 years, age range 23 to 86 years, 82% male). However, few studies contributed data to meta-analyses due to inconsistency in outcome definition and reporting. In general, risk of bias varied from low to high risk of bias across included studies, and insufficient detail was provided to inform judgement in several cases. The quality of the evidence of key outcomes ranged from moderate to low quality due to the presence of moderate or high statistical heterogeneity, imprecision of results or due to limitations in the design of individual studies.Compared with no RIPC, we found that RIPC has no treatment effect on the rate of the composite endpoint with RR 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.25); 2 studies; 2463 participants; moderate-quality evidence. Participants randomised to RIPC showed an equivalent or better effect regarding the amount of cTnT release measured at 72 hours after surgery with SMD -0.32 (95% CI -0.65 to 0.00); 3 studies; 1120 participants; moderate-quality evidence; and expressed as AUC 72 hours with SMD -0.49 (95% CI -0.96 to -0.02); 3 studies; 830 participants; moderate-quality evidence. We found the same result in favour of RIPC for the cTnI release measured at 48 hours with SMD -0.21 (95% CI -0.40 to -0.02); 5 studies; 745 participants; moderate-quality evidence; and measured at 72 hours after surgery with SMD -0.37 (95% CI -0.59 to -0.15); 2 studies; 459 participants; moderate-quality evidence. All other primary outcomes showed no differences between groups (cTnT release measured at 48 hours with SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.06; 4 studies; 1792 participants; low-quality evidence and cTnI release measured as AUC 72 hours with SMD -0.17, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.14; 2 studies; 159 participants; moderate-quality evidence).We also found no differences between groups for all-cause mortality after 30 days, non-fatal myocardial infarction after 30 days, any new stroke after 30 days, acute renal failure after 30 days, length of stay on the intensive care unit (days), any complications and adverse effects related to ischaemic preconditioning. We did not assess many patient-centred/salutogenic-focused outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that RIPC has a treatment effect on clinical outcomes (measured as a composite endpoint including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction or any new stroke, or both, assessed at 30 days after surgery). There is moderate-quality evidence that RIPC has no treatment effect on the rate of the composite endpoint including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction or any new stroke assessed at 30 days after surgery, or both. We found moderate-quality evidence that RIPC reduces the cTnT release measured at 72 hours after surgery and expressed as AUC (72 hours). There is moderate-quality evidence that RIPC reduces the amount of cTnI release measured at 48 hours, and measured 72 hours after surgery. Adequately-designed studies, especially focusing on influencing factors, e.g. with regard to anaesthetic management, are encouraged and should systematically analyse the commonly used medications of people with cardiovascular diseases.

Time to Give Up on Cardioprotection?

The mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains significant, and the prevalence of post-myocardial infarction heart failure is increasing. Therefore, cardioprotection beyond timely reperfusion is needed. Conditioning procedures are the most powerful cardioprotective interventions in animal experiments. However, ischemic preconditioning cannot be used to reduce infarct size in patients with AMI because its occurrence is not predictable; several studies in patients undergoing surgical coronary revascularization report reduced release of creatine kinase and troponin. Ischemic postconditioning reduces infarct size in most, but not all, studies in patients undergoing interventional reperfusion of AMI, but may require direct stenting and exclusion of patients with >6 hours of symptom onset to protect. Remote ischemic conditioning reduces infarct size in patients undergoing interventional reperfusion of AMI, elective percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization, and other cardiovascular surgery in many, but not in all, studies. Adequate dose-finding phase II studies do not exist. There are only 2 phase III trials, both on remote ischemic conditioning in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, both with neutral results in terms of infarct size and clinical outcome, but also both with major problems in trial design. We discuss the difficulties in translation of cardioprotection from animal experiments and proof-of-concept trials to clinical practice. Given that most studies on ischemic postconditioning and all studies on remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with AMI reported reduced infarct size, it would be premature to give up on cardioprotection.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:

To assess the benefits and harms of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with or without valve surgery.

Interaction of risk factors, comorbidities, and comedications with ischemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotection by preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning

Pre-, post-, and remote conditioning of the myocardium are well described adaptive responses that markedly enhance the ability of the heart to withstand a prolonged ischemia/reperfusion insult and provide therapeutic paradigms for cardioprotection. Nevertheless, more than 25 years after the discovery of ischemic preconditioning, we still do not have established cardioprotective drugs on the market. Most experimental studies on cardioprotection are still undertaken in animal models, in which ischemia/reperfusion is imposed in the absence of cardiovascular risk factors. However, ischemic heart disease in humans is a complex disorder caused by, or associated with, cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, insulin resistance, heart failure, altered coronary circulation, and aging. These risk factors induce fundamental alterations in cellular signaling cascades that affect the development of ischemia/reperfusion injury per se and responses to cardioprotective interventions. Moreover, some of the medications used to treat these risk factors, including statins, nitrates, and antidiabetic drugs, may impact cardioprotection by modifying cellular signaling. The aim of this article is to review the recent evidence that cardiovascular risk factors and their medication may modify the response to cardioprotective interventions. We emphasize the critical need to take into account the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and concomitant medications when designing preclinical studies for the identification and validation of cardioprotective drug targets and clinical studies. This will hopefully maximize the success rate of developing rational approaches to effective cardioprotective therapies for the majority of patients with multiple risk factors.

New technique of local ischemic preconditioning induction without repetitive aortic cross-clamping in cardiac surgery

Background

Several studies have demonstrated that local ischemic preconditioning can reduce myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury in cardiac surgery patients; however, preconditioning has not become a standard cardioprotective intervention, primarily because of the increased risk of atheroembolism during repetitive aortic cross-clamping. In the present study, we aimed to describe and validate a novel technique of preconditioning induction.

Methods

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (12 women and 78 men; mean age, 56 ± 11 years) were randomized into 3 groups: (1) Controls (n = 30), (2) Perfusion (n = 30), and (3) Preconditioning (n = 30). All patients were operated under cardiopulmonary bypass using normothermic blood cardioplegia. Preconditioning was induced by subjecting the hemodynamically unloaded heart to 2 cycles of 3 min of ischemia and 3 min of reperfusion with normokalemic blood prior to cardioplegia. In the Perfusion group, the heart perfusion remained unaffected for 12 min. Troponin I (TnI) levels were analyzed before surgery, and 12, 24, 48 h, and 7 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints included the cardiac index, plasma natriuretic peptide level, and postoperative use of inotropes.

Results

Preconditioning resulted in a significant reduction in the TnI level on the 7th postoperative day only (0.10 ± 0.05 and 0.33 ± 0.88 ng/ml in Preconditioning and Perfusion groups, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, cardiac index was significantly higher in the Preconditioning group than in the Control and Perfusion groups just after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. The number of patients requiring inotropic support with ≥ 2 agents after surgery was significantly lower in the Preconditioning and Perfusion group than in the Control group (P < 0.05). No complications of the procedure were recorded in the Preconditioning group.

Conclusions

The preconditioning procedure described can be performed safely in cardiac surgery patients. The application of this technique of preconditioning was associated with certain benefits, including improved left ventricular function after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass and a reduced need for inotropic support. However, the infarct-limiting effect of preconditioning in the early postoperative period was not evident. The procedure does not involve repetitive aortic cross-clamping, thus avoiding possible embolic complications.

Ischemic preconditioning-an unfulfilled promise

Myocardial reperfusion injury has been identified as a key determinant of myocardial infarct size in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical interventions. Although the molecular mechanisms underpinning reperfusion injury have been elucidated, attempts at translating this understanding into clinical benefit for patients undergoing cardiac interventions have produced mixed results. Ischemic conditioning has been applied before, during, or after an ischemic insult to the myocardium and has taken the form of local induction of ischemia or ischemia of distant tissues. Clinical studies have confirmed the safety of differing conditioning techniques, but the benefit of such techniques in reducing hard clinical event rates has produced mixed results. The aim of this article is to review the role of ischemic conditioning in patients undergoing percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization.

Cardioprotection: chances and challenges of its translation to the clinic

Myocardial infarct size is a major determinant of prognosis. Ischaemic preconditioning with brief coronary occlusion and reperfusion before a sustained period of coronary occlusion with reperfusion delays infarct development. Ischaemic postconditioning uses repetitive brief coronary occlusion during early reperfusion of myocardial infarction and reduces infarct size. Remote ischaemic preconditioning uses brief ischaemia and reperfusion of a distant organ to protect the myocardium. These conditioning protocols recruit a complex signal cascade of sarcolemmal receptor activation, intracellular enzyme activation, and ultimately mitochondrial stabilisation and inhibition of death signalling. Conditioning protocols have been successfully used in patients undergoing elective coronary revascularisation and reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction. Pharmacological recruitment of cardioprotective signalling has also been used to reduce infarct size, but so far without prognostic benefit. Outcomes of cardioprotection are affected by age, sex, comorbidities, and drugs, but also by technical issues related to determination of infarct size and revascularisation procedure.

Remote ischemic preconditioning in human coronary artery bypass surgery: from promise to disappointment?

BACKGROUND

We assessed whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) improves myocardial, renal, and lung protection after on-pump coronary surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a single-center, prospective, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled trial. Patients, investigators, anesthetists, surgeons, and critical care teams were blinded to group allocation. Subjects received RIPC (or placebo) stimuli (×3 upper limb (or dummy arm), 5-minute cycles of 200 mm Hg cuff inflation/deflation) before aortic clamping. Anesthesia, perfusion, cardioplegia, and surgical techniques were standardized. The primary end point was 48-hour area under the curve (AUC) troponin T (cTnT) release. Secondary end points were 6-hour and peak cTnT, ECG changes, cardiac index, inotrope and vasoconstrictor use, renal dysfunction, and lung injury. Hospital survival was 99.4%. Comparing placebo and RIPC, median (interquartile range) AUC 48-hour cTnT (ng/mL(-1)/48 h(-1)); 28 (19, 39) versus 30 (22, 38), 6-hour cTnT (ng/mL(-1)); 0.93(0.59, 1.35) versus 1.01(0.72, 1.43), peak cTnT (ng/mL(-1)); 1.02 (0.74, 1.44) versus 1.04 (0.78, 1.51), de novo left bundle-branch block (4% versus 0%) and Q waves (5.3% versus 5.5%), serial cardiac indices, intraaortic balloon pump usage (8.5% versus 7.5%), inotrope (39% versus 50%) and vasoconstrictor usage (66% versus 64%) were not different. Dialysis requirement (1.2% versus 3.8%), peak creatinine (median [interquartile range], 1.2 mg/dL(-1) (1.1, 1.4) versus 1.2 (1.0, 1.4)), and AUC urinary albumin-creatinine ratios 69 (40, 112) versus 58 (32, 85) were not different. Intubation times; median (interquartile range), 937 minutes(766, 1402) versus 895(675, 1180), 6-hour; 278 (210, 338) versus 270 (218, 323) and 12-hour pO(2):FiO(2) ratios 255 (195, 323) versus 263 (210, 308) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to prior smaller studies, RIPC did not reduce troponin release, improve hemodynamics, or enhance renal or lung protection. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.ukcrn.org.uk. Unique identifier: 4659.

Pretreatment with calcitonin gene-related peptide attenuates hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats

OBJECTIVE

Oxygen free radicals and apoptosis play important roles in liver ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. We sought to investigate the protective effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) to attenuate liver I/R injury due to oxygen free radicals and apoptosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Harvested rat livers were perfused via the portal vein with 60 mL of 4 degrees C histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution alone in the control group, or with the same solution containing CGRP (3 microg/10 g body weight) in the experimental group. After 24 hours of cold storage, hepatic enzyme leakage, portal venous pressure, oxygen consumption, total adenine nucleotides (TAN), bile production, lipoperoxide (LPO) release, apoptosis, and histochemical changes were evaluated upon 45 minutes of isolated reperfusion.

RESULTS

Compared with control livers, CGRP-treated organs showed significantly decreased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and glutamate-lactate dehydrogenase (GLDH) leakage and portal venous pressure (2.0 +/- 0.3 vs 4.0 +/- 0.4 mmHg; P < .01), with significantly increased bile production (8.56 +/- 0.76 vs 3.34 +/- 0.68 microL/g/45 min; P < .01), oxygen consumption (5.14 +/- 0.4 vs 2.57 +/- 0.2 microL/g/min; P < .01), and total adenine nucleotides (TAN) (11.1 +/- 0.71 vs 7.02 +/- 0.53 micromol/g; P < .01) upon reperfusion as signs of recovered viability. We observed infrequent positive terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining, especially in sinusoidal lining cells (SLC). The percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in the CGRP group was significantly decreased compared with the control group: (4.1 +/- 0.67 vs 8.0 +/- 1.27; P < .05). Perfusate levels of low molecular weight (LMW) histone-associated DNA fragments (0.36 +/- 0.04 vs 0.53 +/- 0.06 AU; P < .05) were also decreased, coupled with strong 5'-nucleotidase (5'-NT) and LDH activity staining concentrated on the endothelial cells. LPO release in the perfusate was largely decreased: (0.12 +/- 0.02 vs 0.36 +/- 0.04 nmoL/g, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

CGRP ameliorated liver I/R injury due to reactive oxygen species and apoptosis.

'Conditioning' the heart during surgery

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains the procedure of choice for coronary artery revascularisation in a large number of patients with severe CHD. However, the profile of patients undergoing CABG surgery is changing with increasingly higher-risk patients being operated upon, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality in this patient group. Myocardial injury sustained during cardiac surgery, most of which can be attributed to acute myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury, is associated with worse short-term and long-term clinical outcomes. Clearly, new treatment strategies are required to protect the heart during cardiac surgery in terms of reducing myocardial injury and preserving left ventricular systolic function, such that clinical outcomes can be improved. 'Conditioning' the heart to harness its endogenous cardioprotective capabilities using either brief ischaemia or pharmacological agents, provides a potentially novel approach to myocardial protection during cardiac surgery, and is the subject of this review article.

Hsp70 and cardiac surgery: molecular chaperone and inflammatory regulator with compartmentalized effects

Open heart surgery is a unique model to study the interplay between cellular injury, regulation of inflammatory responses and tissue repair. Stress-inducible heat shock protein 70-kDa (Hsp70) provides a molecular link between these events. In addition to molecular chaperoning, Hsp70 exerts modulatory effects on endothelial cells and leukocytes involved in inflammatory networks. Hsp70 residing in the intracellular compartment is part of an inhibitory feedback loop that acts on nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB). In contrast, extracellular Hsp70 is recognized by multiple germline-encoded immune receptors, e.g., Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, TLR4, LOX-1, CD91, CD94, CCR5 and CD40. Hsp70 is thereby able to enhance chemotaxis, phagocytosis and cytolytic activity of innate immune cells and stimulate antigen-specific responses. These apparent contradictory pro- and anti-inflammatory effects of endogenous Hsp70 in the context of cardiac surgery are still not fully understood. An all-embracing model of the compartmentalized effects of endogenous Hsp70 in the orchestration of inflammatory responses in cardiac surgery is proposed.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide-mediated cardioprotection of postconditioning in isolated rat hearts

Previous studies have demonstrated that endogenous calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in mediation of ischemic preconditioning. In the present study, we tested whether CGRP is also involved in mediation of the protective effects of postconditioning in isolated rat hearts. Sixty minutes of left coronary artery occlusion and followed by 60 min of reperfusion caused a significant decrease in cardiac function and a significant increase in creatine kinase (CK) release and infarct size. Postconditioning with three cycles of 1-min ischemia and 1-min reperfusion produced a marked improvement of cardiac function and decreased CK release and infarct size, concomitantly with an increase in the release of CGRP release in coronary effluent. However, the cardioprotection afforded by postconditioning was abolished by CGRP 8-37 (10(-7) M), a selective CGRP receptor antagonist, or pretreatment with capsaicin (50 mg/kg, s.c.), which depletes transmitters in sensory nerves. Exogenous CGRP (5 x 10(-9) M) administration of CGRP reappeared postconditioning-like cardioprotection in the rats pretreated with capsaicin. These results suggest that the protective effects of ischemic postconditioning are related to stimulation of endogenous CGRP release in rat hearts.

Evaluation by Cardiac Troponin I: The Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning as an Adjunct to Intermittent Blood Cardioplegia on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

OBJECTIVE

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is commonly regarded as having a powerful internal protective effect on the organs. The mechanism of IPC is not clear yet, and the controversy over the benefits and protocol of IPC still continues. In this study, we used the sensitive and specific biochemical marker: cardiac troponin-I (CTnI) to evaluate whether IPC as an adjunct to intermittent cold blood cardioplegia (CBC) could reduce myocardial injury, as opposed to simple CBC during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

From May 2003 to December 2003, 40 patients with three vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) and stable angina, receiving first-time elective CABG, were randomly divided into two equal groups: IPC plus CBC (IPC + CBC group, n = 20); and CBC (CBC group, n = 20). The patients in IPC + CBC group received two cycles of ischemia (two min) and reperfusion (three min) before myocardial arrest induced by CBC. The patients in CBC group received 10-minute normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) before CBC arrest. Clinical outcomes were observed during and after the operation. Serial venous blood samples were obtained before induction, after CPB, and postoperatively 6, 12, 24, and 72 hours. Hemodynamic indexes were obtained before and after the bypass by the radial catheter and Swan-Ganz catheter.

RESULTS

In both groups, there were no differences regarding operative parameters. Compared to the baseline, the level of CTnI increased after CPB, peaked 6-12 hours (p < 0.01). Compared to IPC + CBC group, plasma concentrations of CTnI in CBC group were significantly higher at 6 and 12 hours (p < 0.05). CI recovery in IPC + CBC group was more significant than CBC group at 12 and 24 hours (p < 0.05). IPC + CBC also shortened the time of postoperative mechanical ventilation (p < 0.05) after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the simple CBC in lower-risk CABG patients, IPC as an adjunct to CBC reduced CTnI release, improved heart function after surgery, and shortened the time of recovery in CAD patients.

Pre? and postconditioning during cardiac surgery

In spite of improved myocardial protection, postoperative arrhythmias and cardiac failure are still important problems causing morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery. Ischemic preconditioning has been widely investigated experimentally with the purpose of identifying new therapeutic agents, but we have not unraveled the underlying mechanisms and we are not able yet to exploit them pharmacologically in clinical practice. Studies of preconditioning in cardiac surgery provide conflicting results, but the majority of studies show that ischemic preconditioning is an effective adjunct to myocardial protection in cardiac surgery. Interventions aimed at modifying reperfusion, or postconditioning, have the advantage that they also can be used after the ischemic insult has occurred, i.e. also in situations with "non-scheduled" ischemia. Postconditioning, as preconditioning, needs pharmacological mimics to be used routinely in settings of cardiac surgery or other human interventions. Possible common signaling pathways of the two phenomena are discussed, and suggested directions for clinical studies are outlined.

Preconditioning the Myocardium: From Cellular Physiology to Clinical Cardiology

Yellon, Derek M., and James M. Downey. Preconditioning the Myocardium: From Cellular Physiology to Clinical Cardiology. Physiol Rev 83: 1113-1151, 2003; 10.1152/physrev.00009.2003.—The phenomenon of ischemic preconditioning, in which a period of sublethal ischemia can profoundly protect the cell from infarction during a subsequent ischemic insult, has been responsible for an enormous amount of research over the last 15 years. Ischemic preconditioning is associated with two forms of protection: a classical form lasting ∼2 h after the preconditioning ischemia followed a day later by a second window of protection lasting ∼3 days. Both types of preconditioning share similarities in that the preconditioning ischemia provokes the release of several autacoids that trigger protection by occupying cell surface receptors. Receptor occupancy activates complex signaling cascades which during the lethal ischemia converge on one or more end-effectors to mediate the protection. The end-effectors so far have eluded identification, although a number have been proposed. A range of different pharmacological agents that activate the signaling cascades at the various levels can mimic ischemic preconditioning leading to the hope that specific therapeutic agents can be designed to exploit the profound protection seen with ischemic preconditioning. This review examines, in detail, the complex mechanisms associated with both forms of preconditioning as well as discusses the possibility to exploit this phenomenon in the clinical setting. As our understanding of the mechanisms associated with preconditioning are unravelled, we believe we can look forward to the development of new therapeutic agents with novel mechanisms of action that can supplement current treatment options for patients threatened with acute myocardial infarction.

Cardioprotection by St Thomas' solution is mediated by protein kinase C and tyrosine kinase

BACKGROUND

Intracellular signaling pathways, specifically the activation of protein kinase C and tyrosine kinase, are essential to the cardioprotection of ischemic preconditioning. We proposed that activation of PKC and TK contribute to the myocardial protection of St. Thomas' No. 2 cardioplegia solution (STC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolated rat hearts were exposed to 40 min of global ischemia followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Before ischemia, hearts received no treatment (control; n = 7), STC (n = 7), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; n = 6), PMA + chelerythrine (n = 6), anisomycin (n = 6), anisomycin + genistein (n = 7), STC + chelerythrine (n = 7), STC + genistein (n = 7), PMA + genistein (n = 7) or anisomycin + chelerythrine (n = 7). Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) recovery, myocardial infarct size, and lactate dehydrogenase release were measured.

RESULTS

STC as well as PMA (protein kinase C activator) and anisomycin (tyrosine kinase activator) significantly reduced infarct size (6.9 +/- 2.9%, 9.6 +/- 2.1%, 14.0 +/- 4.4%) compared with controls (42.4 +/- 2.9%, P < 0.05). The infarct reduction of PMA and anisomycin were blocked by their inhibitors chelerythrine and genistein, respectively. Both chelerythrine (29.2 +/- 4.1%, P < 0.05) and genistein (40.4 +/- 4.3%, P < 0.05) attenuated the reduction of infarct size provided by STC. The recovery of LVDP improved with STC, PMA and anisomycin (72.6 +/- 1.4%, 60.4 +/- 4.7%, 57.2 +/- 4.6%) compared with control (33.8 +/- 3.6%, P < 0.05). Addition of chelerythrine or genistein to STC impaired recovery of LVDP (52.3 +/- 4.4%, 35.1 +/- 2.5%, P < 0.05) compared with STC treatment.

CONCLUSION

Administration of the pharmacologic inhibitors chelerythrine and genistein blunts the cardioprotection caused by STC treatment.

Hibernation, Stunning, and Preconditioning: Historical Perspective, Current Concepts, Clinical Applications, and Future Implications

Despite considerable advances, coronary artery disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. The development of effective therapeutic strategies for protecting the myocardium from ischemia would have major impact on patients with coronary artery disease. It is now accepted that patients with coronary artery disease can experience prolonged regional ischemic dysfunction that does not necessarily arise from irreversible tissue damage, and to some extent, can be reversed by restoration of blood flow. The initial stages of dysfunction are probably caused by chronic stunning that can be reversed after revascularization, resulting in rapid and complete functional recovery. On the other hand, the more advanced stages of dysfunction likely correspond to chronic hibernation. After revascularization, functional recovery will probably be quite delayed and mostly incomplete. Over the past decade, the possibility that an innate mechanism of myocardial protection might be inducible in the human heart has generated considerable excitement. In the last two decades, there was phenomenal growth in the understanding of the mechanism known as ischemic preconditioning that is responsible for the innate myocardial protection. Continued research and progress in this area may soon lead to the availability of preconditioning-mimetic treatments. The current concepts, mechanisms, and potential clinical applications of myocardial hibernation, stunning, and ischemic preconditioning are reviewed.

CGRP-mediated cardiovascular effect of nitroglycerin

Organic nitrates, including nitroglycerin, produce vascular relaxation by releasing nitric oxide in vascular tissues near the plasma member of smooth muscle cells of veins and arteries. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a major transmitter in capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves, is widely distributed in cardiovascular tissues and the release of CGRP is regulated by multiple autacoids including nitric oxide (NO). CGRP exerts complex cardiovascular effects including potent vasorelaxation and protective effects on myocytes and endothelial cells. Nitroglycerin activates sensory nerves fibres to release CGRP by generating NO and increasing cGMP level, and that the cardiovascular effects of nitroglycerin are partly mediated by endogenous CGRP.

Preconditioning and cardiac surgery

Preconditioning is in experimental studies the most powerful mode of cardioprotection known. The signal transduction pathways involve a variety of trigger substances, mediators, receptors, and effectors. The studies of preconditioning in cardiac surgery provide conflicting results but the majority of studies show that ischemic preconditiong is an effective adjunct to myocardial protection. However, ischemic preconditioning with repeated clamping of the aorta will never get widespread use. If the "preconditioning response" is to be exploited in cardiac surgery, targeting the underlying molecular mechanisms must provide easily applicable techniques or drugs, which are shown in large scale clinical studies to be beneficial.

Myocardial protection by anesthetic agents against ischemia-reperfusion injury: an update for anesthesiologists

PURPOSE

The aim of this review of the literature was to evaluate the effectiveness of anesthetics in protecting the heart against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.

SOURCE

Articles were obtained from the Medline database (1980-, search terms included heart, myocardium, coronary, ischemia, reperfusion injury, infarction, stunning, halothane, enflurane, desflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, opioid, morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil sufentanil, pentazocine, buprenorphine, barbiturate, thiopental, ketamine, propofol, preconditioning, neutrophil adhesion, free radical, antioxidant and calcium).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Protection by volatile anesthetics, morphine and propofol is relatively well investigated. It is generally agreed that these agents reduce the myocardial damage caused by ischemia and reperfusion. Other anesthetics which are often used in clinical practice, such as fentanyl, ketamine, barbiturates and benzodiazepines have been much less studied, and their potential as cardioprotectors is currently unknown. There are some proposed mechanisms for protection by anesthetic agents: ischemic preconditioning-like effect, interference in the neutrophil/platelet-endothelium interaction, blockade of Ca2+ overload to the cytosolic space and antioxidant-like effect. Different anesthetics appear to have different mechanisms by which protection is exerted. Clinical applicability of anesthetic agent-induced protection has yet to be explored.

CONCLUSION

There is increasing evidence of anesthetic agent-induced protection. At present, isoflurane, sevoflurane and morphine appear to be most promising as preconditioning-inducing agents. After the onset of ischemia, propofol could be selected to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury. Future clinical application depends on the full elucidation of the underlying mechanisms and on clinical outcome trials.

The cardioprotection of calcitonin gene-related peptide-mediated preconditioning

Preconditioning induced by brief ischemia or hyperthermia or some drugs shows two phases, early and delayed protection. The cardioprotection afforded by preconditioning is related to stimulation of endogenous mediators release. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a major transmitter of capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves, has recently been shown to play an important role in mediation of the preconditioning induced by brief ischemia or hyperthermia or by some drugs, and alpha-CGRP seems to play a major role in the mediation of delayed preconditioning. It has been shown that the cardioprotection afforded by CGRP-mediated preconditioning is due to inhibition of cardiac tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) production, but not to the activation of the K(ATP) channel.

The protective effects of preconditioning decline in aged patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the effects of myocardial ischemic preconditioning in adult and aged patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Eighty patients with 3-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized into one of the following groups: adult ischemic preconditioning, adult control, aged ischemic preconditioning, and aged control. Hemodynamic data and cardiac troponin I values were compared between the groups. The ischemic preconditioning groups received 2 periods of 2 minutes of ischemia, followed by 3 minutes of reperfusion. The Student t test, chi(2) test, and analysis of variance for repeated measures were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The baseline for right ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac index was similar. Right ventricular ejection fraction was depressed after the operation in all groups. Ischemic preconditioning significantly improved the recovery of right ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac index after the operation in adult patients (P =.013 and.001, respectively), but in the aged group there was no difference in the changes of ejection fraction and cardiac index (P =.232 and.889, respectively). The cardiac troponin I value in the adult patients subjected to ischemic preconditioning was lower than that in the adult control subjects (P =.046), but in aged patients undergoing ischemic preconditioning, the value was similar to that in aged control subjects (P =.897). Ischemic preconditioning also resulted in a shorter postoperative mechanical ventilation time and in less inotropic use in the adult group.

CONCLUSION

Ischemic preconditioning protects the heart from ischemic reperfusion injury in adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning are manifested as a better recovery of right ventricular and global hemodynamic function, cellular viability, and surgical outcome. The protective effect of ischemic preconditioning is diminished in aged patients undergoing coronary bypass.

Myocardial lactate production is not involved in the ischemic preconditioning mechanism in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship between ischemic preconditioning (IP) and lactate production and their impact on coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty 3-vessel disease coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris.

INTERVENTIONS

The IP patients were preconditioned with 2 periods of 2-minute ischemia followed by 3-minute reperfusion before aortic cross-clamping.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The cardiac index (CI) after surgery was significantly higher in the IP group than in controls among stable patients (p = 0.013). IP was not effective in CI recovery in unstable patients. The baseline values of lactate production were 11.6%, 20.3%, -7.0%, and -2.9% in stable IP, stable control, unstable IP, and unstable control patients. Compared with baseline, lactate production increased significantly after the IP protocol (39.0% and 47.5% in the stable and unstable patients), and operation (47.5%, 31.7%, 35.4%, and 35.6% in stable IP, stable control, unstable IP, and unstable control patients) but not after 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary bypass (29.7% and 19.0% in the stable and unstable patients). There were no differences among the groups in lactate production after the operation. Lactate production after the IP protocol was negatively associated with CI recovery after surgery in the IP patients (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

The IP effects do not include modulation of lactate production. IP induces lactate production, but it seems not to be involved in the triggering process.

Ischemic preconditioning and nicorandil pretreatment improve donor heart preservation

The present study investigated the effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and nicorandil pretreatment on myocardial storage in a donor heart preservation model. Isolated rat hearts were separated into groups: group 1, non-preconditioned control group; group 2, 2.5 min of normothermic ischemia followed by 15 min of normothermic Langendorff perfusion (one IPC cycle); and group 3, 2 cycles of IPC. All hearts were subsequently stored in University of Wisconsin solution at 4 degrees C for 2, 4 and 6h, and the concentrations of high-energy phosphate metabolites were measured for each time point. Heart function parameters (aortic flow, coronary flow and cardiac output) were measured when the heart was reperfused following the 2, 4 or 6 h of preservation. The effects of nicorandil, an ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener, on heart function following preservation were also evaluated. Nicorandil was injected intravenously before heart harvesting. The results showed that the energy status was well preserved in the IPC groups. The 2-cycle IPC group showed better recovery of heart function following preservation. Pretreatment with nicorandil also improved functional recovery of the heart following preservation. The present study showed that IPC of the rat heart resulted in improved myocardial energy metabolism and functional recovery after hypothermic preservation, and that nicorandil has potential for pharmacological preconditioning in heart preservation for transplantation.

Pharmacological modulation, preclinical studies, and new clinical features of myocardial ischemic preconditioning

The term "ischemic preconditioning (PC)" was first applied to canine myocardium subjected to brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion that tolerated a more prolonged episode of ischemia better than myocardium not previously exposed to ischemia. Protective effect of myocardial ischemic PC was demonstrated in several animal species, resulting in the strongest endogenous form of protection against myocardial injury, jeopardized myocardium, infarct size, and arrhythmias other than early reperfusion. New onset angina before acute myocardial infarction, episodes of myocardial ischemia during coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery, and the "warm-up" phenomenon may represent clinical counterparts of the PC phenomenon in humans. Here, we have attempted to summarize pharmacological modulation, preclinical studies, and new clinical features of ischemic PC. To date, the pathophysiological basis of the "chemical PC" is still not well established, and "putting PC in a bottle" for clinical applications still remains a new pharmacological venture.

The preconditioning phenomenon: A tool for the scientist or a clinical reality?

The possibility that an innate mechanism of myocardial protection might be inducible in the human heart has generated considerable excitement and enthusiastic research. The potential to enhance myocardial resistance to ischemic injury in patients suffering the consequences of coronary artery disease has led to studies with more direct clinical relevance. However, in common with many other areas of clinical interest based on advances in basic scientific understanding, early enthusiasm may be disproportionate to ultimate therapeutic significance. There can be little doubt that our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of ischemia-reperfusion injury has been enhanced significantly by the plethora of research stimulated by interest in endogenous myocardial protection. Direct extrapolation of observations in the laboratory to the cardiology clinic or operating theater is tempting but should be avoided. The results of recent clinical experiments that suggest that preconditioning can protect against ischemia, although encouraging, should be interpreted cautiously, with particular attention to the limitations of the end points available. A reasoned evaluation of recent research should prevent unrealistic expectations and allow improved design of future trials so that this potent adaptive phenomenon can be exploited to its maximum potential.