Autotransfusion of washed shed mediastinal fluid decreases the requirement for autologous blood transfusion following cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety and availability of transfused donor blood have prompted research into a range of techniques to minimise allogeneic transfusion requirements. Cell salvage (CS) describes the recovery of blood from the surgical field, either during or after surgery, for reinfusion back to the patient.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of CS in minimising perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion and on other clinical outcomes in adults undergoing elective or non-urgent surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two clinical trials registers for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews from 2009 (date of previous search) to 19 January 2023, without restrictions on language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs assessing the use of CS compared to no CS in adults (participants aged 18 or over, or using the study's definition of adult) undergoing elective (non-urgent) surgery only.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 106 RCTs, incorporating data from 14,528 participants, reported in studies conducted in 24 countries. Results were published between 1978 and 2021. We analysed all data according to a single comparison: CS versus no CS. We separated analyses by type of surgery. The certainty of the evidence varied from very low certainty to high certainty. Reasons for downgrading the certainty included imprecision (small sample sizes below the optimal information size required to detect a difference, and wide confidence intervals), inconsistency (high statistical heterogeneity), and risk of bias (high risk from domains including sequence generation, blinding, and baseline imbalances). Aggregate analysis (all surgeries combined: primary outcome only) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if there is a reduction in the risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 0.72; 82 RCTs, 12,520 participants). Cancer: 2 RCTs (79 participants) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for mortality, blood loss, infection, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). There were no analysable data reported for the remaining outcomes. Cardiovascular (vascular): 6 RCTs (384 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for most outcomes. No data were reported for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cardiovascular (no bypass): 6 RCTs (372 participants) Moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is probably a reduction in risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97; 3 RCTs, 169 participants). Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for volume transfused, blood loss, mortality, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hospital length of stay (LOS). There were no analysable data reported for thrombosis, DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), and MACE. Cardiovascular (with bypass): 29 RCTs (2936 participants) Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a reduction in the risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS, and suggests there may be no difference in risk of infection and hospital LOS. Very low- to moderate-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a reduction in volume transfused because of CS, or if there is any difference for mortality, blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, wound complication, thrombosis, DVT, PE, MACE, and MI, and probably no difference in risk of stroke. Obstetrics: 1 RCT (1356 participants) High-certainty evidence shows there is no difference between groups for mean volume of allogeneic blood transfused (mean difference (MD) -0.02 units, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.04; 1 RCT, 1349 participants). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be no difference for risk of allogeneic transfusion. There were no analysable data reported for the remaining outcomes. Orthopaedic (hip only): 17 RCTs (2055 participants) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if CS reduces the risk of allogeneic transfusion, and the volume transfused, or if there is any difference between groups for mortality, blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), thrombosis, DVT, PE, stroke, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for MACE and MI. Orthopaedic (knee only): 26 RCTs (2568 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if CS reduces the risk of allogeneic transfusion, and the volume transfused, and whether there is a difference for blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, PJI, DVT, PE, MI, MACE, stroke, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for mortality and thrombosis. Orthopaedic (spine only): 6 RCTs (404 participants) Moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is probably a reduction in the need for allogeneic transfusion with CS (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.63; 3 RCTs, 194 participants). Very low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggests there may be no difference for volume transfused, blood loss, infection, wound complication, and PE. There were no analysable data reported for mortality, re-operation for bleeding, PJI, thrombosis, DVT, MACE, MI, stroke, and hospital LOS. Orthopaedic (mixed): 14 RCTs (4374 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if there is a reduction in the need for allogeneic transfusion with CS, or if there is any difference between groups for volume transfused, mortality, blood loss, infection, wound complication, PJI, thrombosis, DVT, MI, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for re-operation for bleeding, MACE, and stroke.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In some types of elective surgery, cell salvage may reduce the need for and volume of allogeneic transfusion, alongside evidence of no difference in adverse events, when compared to no cell salvage. Further research is required to establish why other surgeries show no benefit from CS, through further analysis of the current evidence. More large RCTs in under-reported specialities are needed to expand the evidence base for exploring the impact of CS.

Sodium citrate effectively used in shed mediastinal blood autotransfusion after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

We used sodium citrate as an alternative anticoagulation agent to heparin in the procedure of autologous blood transfusion with patients with postoperative haemorrhage after CPB. The aim of study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium citrate used in shed mediastinal blood autotransfusion after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients were divided into two groups in this study. In the control group, 52 patients' shed mediastinal blood was discarded. The reinfusion group consisted of 41 patients receiving a reinfusion of washed autologous red cells from shed mediastinal blood. Each 400 mL shed blood sample was anticoagulated by 140 mL of 1.6% diluted sodium citrate in the washing procedure using a blood recovery machine. Hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), and electrolyte concentrations in both the patients and shed mediastinal blood were measured before and after this procedure.

RESULTS

The mean volume of autotransfused shed blood was 239.5 ± 54.6 mL.The Hct of the washed red cells was 56.8 ± 6.1%. Significantly, fewer units of allogeneic blood were required per patient in the reinfusion group at 24 h postoperatively (2.91 ± 1.34 vs 4.03 ± 0.19 U, p = 0.002). At 24 h postoperatively, Hb and Hct levels were higher in the reinfusion group than in the control group. The calcium ion concentration was very low in the shed mediastinal blood, 0.25 ± 0.08 mmol/L, and was lower after washing, 0.15 ± 0.04 mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium citrate, as an alternative anticoagulant agent, can be used in autologous shed mediastinal blood transfusion after CPB cardiac surgery. This procedure can effectively reduce the amount of allogeneic blood for patients with haemorrhage.

Cell Salvage at the ICU

Patient Blood Management (PBM) is a patient-centered, systemic and evidence-based approach. Its target is to manage and to preserve the patient's own blood. The aim of PBM is to improve patient safety. As indicated by several meta-analyses in a systematic literature search, the cell salvage technique is an efficient method to reduce the demand for allogeneic banked blood. Therefore, cell salvage is an important tool in PBM. Cell salvage is widely used in orthopedic-, trauma-, cardiac-, vascular and transplant surgery. Especially in cases of severe bleeding cell salvage adds significant value for blood supply. In cardiac and orthopedic surgery, the postoperative use for selected patients at the intensive care unit is feasible and can be implemented well in practice. Since the retransfusion of unwashed shed blood should be avoided due to multiple side effects and low quality, cell salvage can be used to reduce postoperative anemia with autologous blood of high quality. Implementing quality management, compliance with hygienic standards as well as training and education of staff, it is a cost-efficient method to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion. The following article will discuss the possibilities, legal aspects, implementation and costs of using cell salvage devices in an intensive care unit.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) based on a multimodal perioperative medicine approach in adult cardiac surgery patients with the aim of improving patient satisfaction, reducing postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reducing the length of hospital stay.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Société française de chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide the assessment of the quality of evidence.

METHODS

Six fields were defined: (1) selection of the patient pathway and its information; (2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; (3) anaesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery; (4) surgical strategy for cardiac surgery and bypass management; (5) patient blood management; and (6) postoperative enhanced recovery. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out and analyses were performed using the GRADE approach. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 33 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. After three rounds of voting and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached for the 33 recommendations. Of these recommendations, 10 have a high level of evidence (7 GRADE 1+ and 3 GRADE 1-); 19 have a moderate level of evidence (15 GRADE 2+ and 4 GRADE 2-); and 4 are expert opinions. Finally, no recommendations were provided for 3 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement existed among the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the complete perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Efficacy of intraoperative cell salvage in decreasing perioperative blood transfusion rates in first-time cardiac surgery patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in transfusion reduction during cardiac surgery remains conflicting. We sought to evaluate the impact of routine ICS on outcomes following cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nonemergent, first-time cardiac surgery 18 months before and 18 months after the implementation of routine ICS. Perioperative transfusion rates, postoperative bleeding, clinical and hematological outcomes, and overall cost were examined. We used multivariable logistic regression modelling to determine the risk-adjusted effect of ICS on likelihood of perioperative transfusion.

RESULTS

A total of 389 patients formed the final study population (186 undergoing ICS and 203 controls). Patients undergoing ICS had significantly lower perioperative transfusion rates of packed red blood cells (pRBCs; 33.9% v. 45.3% p = 0.021), coagulation products (16.7% v. 32.5% p < 0.001) and any blood product (38.2% v. 52.7%, p = 0.004). Patients receiving ICS had decreased mediastinal drainage at 12 h (mean 320 [range 230-550] mL v. mean 400 [range 260-690] mL, p = 0.011) and increased postoperative hemoglobin (mean 104.7 ± 13.2 g/L v. 95.0 ± 11.9 g/L, p < 0.001). Following adjustment for other baseline and intraoperative covariates, ICS emerged as an independent predictor of lower perioperative transfusion rates of pRBCs (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.87), coagulation products (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.71) and any blood product (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.77). Additionally, ICS was associated with a cost benefit of $116 per patient.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative cell salvage could represent a clinically cost-effective way of reducing transfusion rates in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Further research on systematic ICS is required before recommending it for routine use.

The use of a mini bypass system (Cobe Synergy) without venous and cardiotomy reservoir in a mitral valve repair: a case report

The use of mini cardiopulmonary bypass circuits is an emerging technology. The venous and cardiotomy reservoir have been excluded from the circuit. This results in a reduction of the blood contact surface area and of the priming volume.

Entrainment of venous air, however, remains a drawback in the widespread acceptance of using these mini circuits.

The technique described resolves this problem by automatic removal of venous air, and explains how this mini cardiopulmonary bypass circuit was utilized on a 64-year-old female presented for a mitral valve repair.

In the absence of a cardiotomy reservoir, an autotrans-fusion cell separator was used to process shed blood and, after CPB, the residual pump blood.

This mini bypass circuit, with the safety feature to remove automatically venous air, provided an additional degree of protection.

In our experience, mini bypass circuits allow us safely to perform cardiopulmonary bypass during valve procedures.

The Safety and Efficacy of “Bloodless” Cardiac Surgery

Nearly 20% of blood transfusions in the United States are associated with cardiac surgery. Despite the many blood conservation techniques that are available, safe, and efficacious for patients undergoing cardiac surgery, many of these operations continue to be associated with significant amounts of blood transfusion. Although surgical bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass is a common problem as reflected by the substantial use of blood products, it is the individual physician and institutional behavior that have been identified as reasons for transfusion and not necessarily patient comorbidity or blood loss. Transfusion rates in cardiac surgery remain high despite major advances in perioperative blood conservation, with large variations among individual centers. The adoption of available blood conservation techniques, either alone or in combination in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, could result in an estimated 75% reduction of unnecessary transfusions. The success of previously reported blood conservations programs in cardiac surgery should call for a reevaluation of allogeneic transfusion practices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. By applying the numerous reported blood conservation strategies for the management of patients presenting for cardiac surgery, we can preserve our dwindling blood resources and help alleviate some of the direct costs of blood as well as the indirect costs of treating noninfectious and infectious complications of transfusion.

Washed cell salvage in surgical patients: A review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials under PRISMA

BACKGROUND

Cell salvage is commonly used as part of a blood conservation strategy. However concerns among clinicians exist about the efficacy of transfusion of washed cell salvage.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which patients, scheduled for all types of surgery, were randomized to washed cell salvage or to a control group with no cell salvage. Data were independently extracted, risk ratio (RR), and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Data were pooled using a random effects model. The primary endpoint was the number of patients exposed to allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

RESULTS

Out of 1140 search results, a total of 47 trials were included. Overall, the use of washed cell salvage reduced the rate of exposure to allogeneic RBC transfusion by a relative 39% (RR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.65; P < 0.001), resulting in an average saving of 0.20 units of allogeneic RBC per patient (weighted mean differences [WMD] = -0.20; 95% CI -0.22 to -0.18; P < 0.001), reduced risk of infection by 28% (RR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.97; P = 0.03), reduced length of hospital stay by 2.31 days (WMD = -2.31; 95% CI -2.50 to -2.11; P < 0.001), but did not significantly affect risk of mortality (RR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.34; P = 0.66). No statistical difference could be observed in the number of patients exposed to re-operation, plasma, platelets, or rate of myocardial infarction and stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Washed cell salvage is efficacious in reducing the need for allogeneic RBC transfusion and risk of infection in surgery.

Are we doing everything we can to conserve blood during bypass? A national survey

Introduction: Despite major advances in biomaterial research and blood conservation, bleeding is still a common complication after cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac surgery remains a major consumer of blood products. Although the underlying mechanisms for these effects are not fully established, two proposed major etiologies are the hemodilution associated with the use of the heart-lung machine and the impact of reinfusion of shed cardiotomy blood. Therapeutic strategies that primarily encompass the use of devices or technologies to overcome these effects may result in improved clinical outcomes.

Objective: To determine the extent to which 1) lipid/leukocyte filtration and centrifugal processing of cardiotomy blood, and 2) modified ultrafiltration (MUF) are currently applied in adult cardiac surgery in Canada.

Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to the chief perfusionist at all adult cardiac surgical centers in Canada, addressing details regarding the frequency of use of cardiotomy blood processing and MUF.

Results: All questionnaires (36, 100%) were completed and returned. With regards to cardiotomy blood management, in 21 centers (58%), no specific processing steps were utilized exclusive of the integrated cardiotomy reservoir filter. Of the remaining centers, two (6%) reported using lipid/leukocyte filtration and 15 (42%) reported washing their cardiotomy blood. Three centers (8%) reported using MUF at the end of CPB.

Conclusions: Despite growing concern about the potential detrimental effects of cardiotomy blood, few centers in Canada routinely manage this blood with additional filtration and/or centrifugal processing prior to reinfusion. Similarly, MUF, demonstrated to be effective in the pediatric population, has not seen popular application in adult cardiac surgical practice.

Additional postoperative cell salvage of shed mediastinal blood in cardiac surgery does not reduce allogeneic blood transfusions: a cohort study

Objectives:

Does additional postoperative collection and processing of mediastinal shed blood with a cell salvage device reduce the number of allogeneic blood transfusions compared to intraoperative cell salvage alone?

Methods:

A single-centre cohort study in which adult patients with coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement were allocated to either a C.A.T.S® group with intraoperative blood processing only or a CardioPat® group with both intra- and postoperative blood processing. The primary endpoint was the number of allogeneic blood transfusions during hospital admission.

Results:

The study included 99 patients; 50 in the C.A.T.S® and 49 in the CardioPat® group. There was no difference in the number of red blood cells (RBC) (C.A.T.S® group 43 units versus CardioPat® 50 units, p=0.74), fresh frozen plasma (C.A.T.S® 8 units versus CardioPat® 8 units, p=1.00) or platelets (C.A.T.S® 5 units versus CardioPat® 4 units, p=1.00) transfused during the hospital stay. Cardiac creatinine kinase (CK-MB) and troponin levels did not differ between the groups although a significant time effect (p<0.001) was present. Creatinine kinase (CK) levels were not different between the groups three hours after arrival in the intensive care unit (ICU) (CardioPat® group versus C.A.T.S® group, p=0.17). But, compared to the C.A.T.S® group on the first (350 [232-469] IU/L) and second postoperative days (325 [201-480] IU/L), the increase in CK levels was more in the CardioPat® group on the first (431 [286-642] IU/L, p=0.02) and second postoperative days (406 [239-760] IU/L, p=0.05), resulting in a difference between the groups (p=0.04)

Conclusions:

Postoperative cell salvage does not reduce transfusion requirements compared to intraoperative cell salvage alone, but results in elevated total CK levels that suggest haemolysis.

Does transfusion of residual cardiopulmonary bypass circuit blood increase postoperative bleeding? A prospective randomized study in patients undergoing on pump cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE

Homologous blood transfusion after open heart surgery puts a tremendous load on the blood banks. This prospective randomized study evaluates the efficacy of infusing back residual cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit i.e., pump blood as a means to reduce homologous transfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and whether its use increases postoperative drainage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven consecutive patients who underwent elective CABGs under CPB were randomized into 2 groups: (1) cases where residual pump blood was used and (2) controls where residual pump blood was not used. Patients were monitored for hourly drainage on the day of surgery and the 1(st) postoperative day and the requirements of homologous blood and its products. Data were matched regarding change in Hemoglobin, Packed Cell Volume and coagulation parameters till 1st postoperative day. All cases were followed up for three years.

RESULTS

There was a marginal reduction in bleeding pattern in the early postoperative period in the cases compared to controls. The requirement of homologous blood and its products were also reduced in the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CPB circuit blood is safe in the immediate postoperative period. The requirement of homologous blood transfusion can come down if strict transfusion criteria are maintained.

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have prompted reconsideration of the use of allogeneic (from an unrelated donor) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and a range of techniques to minimise transfusion requirements.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence for the efficacy of cell salvage in reducing allogeneic blood transfusion and the evidence for any effect on clinical outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified studies by searching CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1950 to June 2009), EMBASE (1980 to June 2009), the internet (to August 2009) and bibliographies of published articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials with a concurrent control group in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to cell salvage (autotransfusion) or to a control group who did not receive the intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently extracted and the risk of bias assessed. Relative risks (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were the number of patients exposed to allogeneic red cell transfusion and the amount of blood transfused. Other clinical outcomes are detailed in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 75 trials were included. Overall, the use of cell salvage reduced the rate of exposure to allogeneic RBC transfusion by a relative 38% (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.70). The absolute reduction in risk (ARR) of receiving an allogeneic RBC transfusion was 21% (95% CI 15% to 26%). In orthopaedic procedures the RR of exposure to RBC transfusion was 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.57) compared to 0.77 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.86) for cardiac procedures. The use of cell salvage resulted in an average saving of 0.68 units of allogeneic RBC per patient (WMD -0.68; 95% CI -0.88 to -0.49). Cell salvage did not appear to impact adversely on clinical outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest cell salvage is efficacious in reducing the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion in adult elective cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. The use of cell salvage did not appear to impact adversely on clinical outcomes. However, the methodological quality of trials was poor. As the trials were unblinded and lacked adequate concealment of treatment allocation, transfusion practices may have been influenced by knowledge of the patients' treatment status potentially biasing the results in favour of cell salvage.

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood, have prompted reconsideration of the use of allogeneic (blood from an unrelated donor) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and a range of techniques to minimise transfusion requirements.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence for the efficacy of cell salvage in reducing allogeneic blood transfusion and the evidence for any effect on clinical outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified studies by searching CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1950 to June 2009), EMBASE (1980 to June 2009), the Internet (to August 2009) and bibliographies of published articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials with a concurrent control group in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to cell salvage (autotransfusion), or to a control group, who did not receive the intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently extracted and the risk of bias assessed. Relative risks (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Data were pooled using a random effects model. The primary outcomes were the number of patients exposed to allogeneic red cell transfusion, and the amount of blood transfused. Other clinical outcomes are detailed in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 75 trials were included. Overall, the use of cell salvage reduced the rate of exposure to allogeneic RBC transfusion by a relative 38% (RR=0.62: 95% CI 0.55 to 0.70). The absolute reduction in risk (ARR) of receiving an allogeneic RBC transfusion was 21% (95% CI 15% to 26%). In orthopaedic procedures the RR of exposure to RBC transfusion was 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.57) compared to 0.77 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.86) for cardiac procedures. The use of cell salvage resulted in an average saving of 0.68 units of allogeneic RBC per patient (WMD=-0.68; 95% CI -0.88 to -0.49). Cell salvage did not appear to impact adversely on clinical outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest cell salvage is efficacious in reducing the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion in adult elective cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. The use of cell salvage did not appear to impact adversely on clinical outcomes. However, the methodological quality of trials was poor. As the trials were unblinded and lacked adequate concealment of treatment allocation, transfusion practices may have been influenced by knowledge of the patients' treatment status potentially biasing the results in favour of cell salvage.

Should the cardiotomy suction blood be cell-saver processed before retransfusion? A clinico-pathologic mystery

The use of cardiotomy suction (CS) in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery is associated with a pronounced systemic inflammatory response and a resulting coagulopathy as well as exacerbating the microembolic load. However, CS is yet been employed to preserve autologous blood during on-pump surgery. Though processing CS blood with a cell saving device is considered paramount in significantly reducing the inflammatory effects, yet this might also have potential harmful effects on the outcome of the patient. Here we discuss the results of the different prospective and randomized studies to address these issue if the cell saver technique in processing CS blood before retransfusion is to establish its identity and role in the CPB surgery.

Efficacy of cell saver in reducing homologous blood transfusions during OPCAB surgery: a prospective randomized trial

Despite the refinements in surgical technique, rates of homologous blood transfusion (HBT) in cardiac surgery remain high. The adverse effects of blood transfusion are well documented. Retransfusion of shed mediastinal blood reduces the requirement for HBTs during conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. However, some studies have found that autotransfusion leads to bleeding diathesis and paradoxical increase in blood transfusions. Through this prospective randomized trial, we have studied the safety and efficacy of this modality in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Fifty patients enrolled in the study and 49 fulfilled the study criteria. They were randomly divided into group C (cell saver) and group N (non-cell saver). Whereas the cell saver group received processed shed autologous blood and homologous blood if necessary, the non-saver group was transfused homologous blood only. The threshold for transfusion was haemoglobin of 9 g dL(-1) in both the groups. The cell saver group required significantly less number of HBTs (1.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.4 +/- 1.3 units). The incidence of re-exploration was zero in both the groups. The mean mediastinal drainage in both the groups was not significantly different (355 +/- 196 vs. 316 +/- 119.8 mL). The number of patients requiring any blood transfusion however was very high. All the patients in the non-saver group and 20 (83%) of the patients in the saver group received homologous blood. During OPCAB surgery, the use of cell saver reduced the requirement for HBT. Its use is not associated with any clinically significant bleeding diathesis.

Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients having cardiac procedures (15% to 20%) consume more than 80% of the blood products transfused at operation. Blood must be viewed as a scarce resource that carries risks and benefits. A careful review of available evidence can provide guidelines to allocate this valuable resource and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed all available published evidence related to blood conservation during cardiac operations, including randomized controlled trials, published observational information, and case reports. Conventional methods identified the level of evidence available for each of the blood conservation interventions. After considering the level of evidence, recommendations were made regarding each intervention using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification scheme.

RESULTS

Review of published reports identified a high-risk profile associated with increased postoperative blood transfusion. Six variables stand out as important indicators of risk: (1) advanced age, (2) low preoperative red blood cell volume (preoperative anemia or small body size), (3) preoperative antiplatelet or antithrombotic drugs, (4) reoperative or complex procedures, (5) emergency operations, and (6) noncardiac patient comorbidities. Careful review revealed preoperative and perioperative interventions that are likely to reduce bleeding and postoperative blood transfusion. Preoperative interventions that are likely to reduce blood transfusion include identification of high-risk patients who should receive all available preoperative and perioperative blood conservation interventions and limitation of antithrombotic drugs. Perioperative blood conservation interventions include use of antifibrinolytic drugs, selective use of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, routine use of a cell-saving device, and implementation of appropriate transfusion indications. An important intervention is application of a multimodality blood conservation program that is institution based, accepted by all health care providers, and that involves well thought out transfusion algorithms to guide transfusion decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, institution-specific protocols should screen for high-risk patients, as blood conservation interventions are likely to be most productive for this high-risk subset. Available evidence-based blood conservation techniques include (1) drugs that increase preoperative blood volume (eg, erythropoietin) or decrease postoperative bleeding (eg, antifibrinolytics), (2) devices that conserve blood (eg, intraoperative blood salvage and blood sparing interventions), (3) interventions that protect the patient's own blood from the stress of operation (eg, autologous predonation and normovolemic hemodilution), (4) consensus, institution-specific blood transfusion algorithms supplemented with point-of-care testing, and most importantly, (5) a multimodality approach to blood conservation combining all of the above.

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood, have prompted reconsideration of the use of allogeneic (blood from an unrelated donor) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and a range of techniques to minimise transfusion requirements.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence for the efficacy of cell salvage in reducing allogeneic blood transfusion and the evidence for any effect on clinical outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents and the websites of international health technology assessment agencies. The reference lists in identified trials and review articles were also searched, and study authors were contacted to identify additional studies. The searches were updated in January 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled parallel group trials in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to cell salvage, or to a control group, who did not receive the intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. The main outcomes measures were the number of patients exposed to allogeneic red cell transfusion, and the amount of blood transfused. Other outcomes measured were re-operation for bleeding, blood loss, post-operative complications (thrombosis, infection, non-fatal myocardial infarction, renal failure), mortality, and length of hospital stay (LOS).

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, the use of cell salvage reduced the rate of exposure to allogeneic RBC transfusion by a relative 39% (relative risk [RR] = 0.61: 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 0.71). The absolute reduction in risk (ARR) of receiving an allogeneic RBC transfusion was 23% (95% CI 16% to 30%). In orthopaedic procedures the RR of exposure to RBC transfusion was 0.42 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.54) compared to 0.77 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.87) for cardiac procedures. The use of cell salvage resulted in an average saving of 0.67 units of allogeneic RBC per patient (weighted mean difference was -0.64; 95% CI -0.89 to -0.45). Cell salvage did not appear to impact adversely on clinical outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest cell salvage is efficacious in reducing the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion in adult elective surgery. However, the methodological quality of trials was poor. As the trials were unblinded and lacked adequate concealment of treatment allocation, transfusion practices may have been influenced by knowledge of the patients' treatment status biasing the results in favour of cell salvage.

Safety, efficacy, and cost of intraoperative cell salvage and autotransfusion after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated, in a randomized controlled trial, the safety and effectiveness of intraoperative cell salvage and autotransfusion of washed salvaged red blood cells after first-time coronary artery bypass grafting performed on the beating heart.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery were prospectively randomized to autotransfusion (n = 30; receiving autotransfused washed blood from intraoperative cell salvage) or control (n = 31; receiving homologous blood only as blood-replacement therapy). Homologous blood was given according to unit protocols.

RESULTS

The groups were well matched with respect to demographic and comorbid characteristics. Patients in the autotransfusion group had a significantly higher 24-hour postoperative hemoglobin concentration (11.9 g/dL; SD, 1.41 g/dL) than those in the control group (10.5 g/dL; SD, 1.37 g/dL) (mean difference, 1.02 g/dL; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-0.44 g/dL; P = .0007), as well as a 20% reduction in the frequency of homologous blood product use (11/31 vs 5/30; P = .095). Autotransfusion of washed red blood cells was not associated with any derangement of thromboelastograph values or laboratory measures of clotting pathway function (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen levels), increased postoperative bleeding, fluid requirements, or adverse clinical events. There was no statistical difference between groups in the total operation, hospitalization, and management costs per patient (median difference, USD 1015.90; 95% confidence interval, -USD 2260 to USD 206; P = .11). Conclusions Intraoperative cell salvage and autotransfusion was associated with higher postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, a modest reduction in transfusion requirements, no adverse clinical or coagulopathic effects, and no significant increase in cost compared with controls. This study supports its routine use in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: Conventional Surgery versus Bloodless Surgery

Bleeding during and after cardiac operations and the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass hemodilution commonly result in blood transfusions. Excessive microvascular bleeding can result in re-exploration and prolonged hospitalization. Nearly 20% of all blood transfusions in the United States are associated with cardiac surgery. The risks associated with the use of allogeneic blood product transfusion include mistransfusion, immunologic complications, and transmission of infectious diseases. The large demand for blood products places significant pressure on the national blood supply, resulting in frequent shortages. The variability in transfusion practice of cardiac surgery patients suggests that sound blood management and a conservative approach to this population can result in reduced transfusions without increasing morbidity or mortality and avoiding complications associated with allogeneic blood transfusion.

Safety and efficacy of perioperative cell salvage and autotransfusion after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to ascertain whether cell salvage and autotransfusion after first time elective coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with a significant reduction in the use of homologous blood, a clinically significant derangement of postoperative clotting profiles, or an increased risk of postoperative bleeding.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to autotransfusion (n = 98) receiving autotransfused washed blood from intraoperative cell salvage and postoperative mediastinal fluid cell salvage after coronary artery bypass surgery or control (n = 102) receiving stored homologous blood only after coronary artery bypass surgery.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of demographics, comorbidity, risk stratification, or operative details. Mean volume of blood autotransfused was 367 +/- 113 mL. Patients in the autotransfusion group were significantly less likely to receive a homologous blood transfusion compared with controls (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.71) and received significantly fewer units of blood per patient compared with controls (0.43 +/- 1.5 vs 0.90 +/- 2.0 U, p = 0.02). There was no difference between the groups in terms of postoperative blood loss, fluid requirements, blood product requirements, or in the incidence of adverse clinical events (p = NS chi(2)). Autotransfusion did not produce any significant derangement of thromboelastograph values or laboratory measures of clotting pathway function (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, and fibrinogen D-dimer levels) when compared with the effect of homologous blood transfusion (p = NS, repeated measures analysis of variance [MANOVA]).

CONCLUSIONS

Autotransfusion is a safe and effective method of reducing the use of homologous bank blood after routine first time coronary artery bypass grafting.

[Identification of risk factors for allogenic transfusion in cardiac surgery from an observational study]

OBJECTIVE

To determine perioperative variables for predicting allogenic transfusion in adult cardiac surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

PATIENTS

We included 335 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery between February and April 2001.

METHODS

Perioperative variables were prospectively collected in a database. For each patient who received transfusion, hemoglobin threshold for transfusion and total number of units of red cell concentrates were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The two strategies for blood conservation which were predominantly used were aprotinin therapy (78%) and blood salvage from the extracorporeal circuit (68%). During perioperative period, 42% of patients [95% CI: 37-47%] received allogenic transfusion. The haemoglobin threshold for transfusion was 7.4 +/- 1.1 and 8.0 +/- 0.7 g x dl(-1) in operating room and in intensive care unit, respectively. On average, 3.4 +/- 2.7 units of red cell concentrates were transfused perioperatively per patient. Using multivariate analysis, perioperative allogenic transfusion was significantly associated with the following variables: preoperative haemoglobin level < 12 g x dl(-1) (odds ratio 8.9; p = 0.001), emergency procedure (odds = 3.7, p = 0.01), reoperation (odds ratio = 3.3; p = 0.002), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio = 2.5; p = 0.03) and complex surgery (odds ratio = 2.4; p = 0.01). The age, the gender, and body mass index were only independent risk factors by univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In despite of techniques to limit requirement of allogenic transfusion, a large proportion of cardiac surgical patients remains transfused. Independent risk factors of perioperative transfusion are haemoglobin level < 12 g x dl(-1), emergency procedure, reoperation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and complex surgery.

Processing and transfusion of residual cardiopulmonary bypass volume: effects on haemostasis, complement activation, postoperative blood loss and transfusion volume

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the effects of the transfusion of unprocessed and cell saver-processed residual cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) volume on haemostasis, complement activation, postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements after elective cardiac surgery. Blood samples were taken at eight points in time, perioperatively. Haematological data, including haemoglobin, haematocrit and platelet counts as well as coagulation parameters, including activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, thrombin time, fibrinogen and the fibrinolytic parameter D-dimers, were measured from each blood sample. For the assessment of complement activation, the total complement CH50 was analysed. In addition, postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were measured during the first 24 hours, postoperatively. The results of the study showed impaired haemostasis after the transfusion of both unprocessed and processed CPB volume. No significant differences were found between the groups in the measured coagulation parameters. Nor was a significant difference found in the complement concentration. However, in patients transfused with unprocessed CPB volume, a significantly (p = 0.019) higher amount of blood loss was found, postoperatively. In the same group of patients, the number of units of allogeneic erythrocyte concentrate suspension transfused was also significantly (p = 0.023) higher during the first 24 hours, postoperatively, compared to the patients transfused with processed CPB blood. The number of units of fresh frozen plasma and platelet suspension transfused was not significantly different between the groups. In conclusion, processing CPB volume in combination with processing peroperative blood loss may result in reducing the volume of transfusion needed of allogeneic blood products.

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood, have prompted reconsideration of the use of allogeneic (blood from an unrelated donor) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and a range of techniques to minimise transfusion requirements.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence for the efficacy of cell salvage in reducing allogeneic blood transfusion and the evidence for any effect on clinical outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Articles were identified by: computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents (to July 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 2, 2002) and websites of international health technology assessment agencies. References in the identified trials and review articles were searched and authors contacted to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled parallel group trials in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to cell salvage, or to a control group, who did not receive the intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed using criteria proposed by Schulz et al. (Schulz 1995) and Jadad et al. (Jadad 1996). Main outcomes measured were: the number of patients exposed to allogeneic red cell transfusion, and the amount of blood transfused. Other outcomes measured were: re-operation for bleeding, blood loss, post-operative complications (thrombosis, infection, non-fatal myocardial infarction, renal failure), mortality, and length of hospital stay (LOS).

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, the use of cell salvage reduced the rate of exposure to allogeneic RBC transfusion by a relative 40% (relative risk [RR] = 0.60: 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51 to 0.70). The absolute reduction in risk (ARR) of receiving an allogeneic RBC transfusion was 23% (95%CI = 16% to 30%). In orthopaedic procedures the relative risk (RR) of exposure to RBC transfusion was 0.42 (95%CI = 0.32 to 0.54) compared to 0.78 (95%CI = 0.68 to 0.88) for cardiac procedures. The use of cell salvage resulted in an average saving of 0.64 units of allogeneic RBC per patient (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.64: 95%CI = -0.86 to -0.46). Cell salvage did not appear to impact adversely on clinical outcomes.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest cell salvage is efficacious in reducing the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion in adult elective surgery. However, the methodological quality of trials was poor. As the trials were unblinded and lacked adequate concealment of treatment allocation, transfusion practices may have been influenced by knowledge of the patient's treatment status biasing the results in favour of cell salvage.

Mechanisms behind operating room blood transfusions in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with insignificant bleeding

OBJECTIVE

To investigate situations in cardiac surgery when transfusions are sometimes used for indications other than to compensate for surgical bleeding.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Cardiac surgery unit at a university teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n = 2,469).

INTERVENTIONS

A subgroup of patients with surgical bleeding of < or = 400 mL (n = 982) was selected to identify mechanisms leading to perioperative erythrocyte transfusion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Bleeding of >400 mL triggered transfusion. At less than this bleeding volume, other indications were noted: unstable angina, use of blood cardioplegia, and bad surgical outcome, such as inotropic support. After exclusion of these predictors and anemic patients, the strongest predictors were female gender (p < 0.001), weight < or = 70 kg (p < 0.001), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time > or = 90 minutes (p = 0.002), CPB cooling < or = 32 degrees C (p = 0.038), and advanced age (p < 0.001). Results from a more detailed study of medical records showed that within its normal concentration range, the operating room-transfused patients had lower hemoglobin levels. When followed postoperatively in the intensive care unit and ward, these patients continued to receive more transfusions (p < 0.05) even though their bleeding in the intensive care unit did not differ from the control subjects.

CONCLUSION

Some patients are transfused because of institutional bias of an anticipated need rather than for true surgical bleeding. A concern of hemodilution from standard CPB circuits suggests a possible advantage with low-priming volume for smaller adult female patients.

Mechanical methods of reducing blood transfusion in cardiac surgery: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of two mechanical methods of blood conservation in reducing the need for allogeneic red blood cells or coagulation products during cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Regional cardiac centre in a teaching hospital in Southampton.

PARTICIPANTS

263 adults aged 18-80 years undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery entered the study, of whom 252 completed the trial. All patients received routine perioperative care. Patients were allocated to one of three treatment groups: intraoperative cell salvage, intraoperative cell salvage with acute perioperative normovolaemic haemodilution, or no mechanical blood conservation. There were 84 patients in each group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Numbers of patients who received allogeneic blood or coagulation products, and the mean number of units of blood transfused per patient.

RESULTS

Of the patients in the intraoperative cell salvage group, 26 were given a transfusion of allogeneic blood, compared with 43 in the control group (odds ratio 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.80)). The mean number of units of allogeneic blood transfused per patient in the intraoperative cell salvage group was 0.68 units (SD=1.55), compared with 1.07 (1.56) units in the control group. 32 of the patients in the intraoperative cell salvage group were given any blood product, compared with 47 in the control group (odds ratio 0.47 (0.25 to 0.89); P=0.019). Combining acute perioperative normovolaemic haemodilution with intraoperative cell salvage conferred no additional benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

An intraoperative cell salvage device should be used in elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Pharmacological strategies may achieve further reductions in blood transfusions. Yet further reductions in blood transfusions could be achieved if the lower safe limit of haemoglobin concentration in patients undergoing cardiac surgery were known.

Effectiveness of combined blood conservation measures in thoracic aortic operations with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of blood conservation measures for thoracic aortic operations with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest has not yet been documented.

METHODS

From July 1997 to December 2000, 148 thoracic aortic operations were performed in our department. Sixty-one cases involving patients who underwent elective thoracic aortic operation with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients did not meet the criteria for the blood conservation program and were excluded from the present study. Therefore, 44 patients were analyzed in this study. Overall, 50% of patients did not require operative homologous blood transfusion (HBT) and 43% did not require in-hospital HBT. Smaller amounts of autologous donation, greater blood loss, and a longer operation time were independent risk factors for HBT requirement. Among 16 patients who had made an autologous donation of 1,600 mL or greater, 75% did not require intraoperative HBT and 69% did not require in-hospital HBT. The overall perioperative mortality rate was 4.5%. As for postoperative complications, prolonged intubation and postoperative infection were significantly more frequent among patients who required in-hospital HBT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our combined blood conservation measures were effective in avoiding HBT during major thoracic aortic operations with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and may have reduced postoperative complications. The amount of the autologous donation was a strong predictor for avoiding HBT.

Troponin I concentrations of shed blood might influence monitoring of myocardial injury after coronary operations

In a prospective study we evaluated the concentration of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase activities (CK) in shed mediastinal blood in the early postoperative period after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Forty seven patients who underwent first time elective CABG were studied. CTnI levels and CK activities in arterial blood and shed mediastinal blood were measured after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 6 h after unclamping the aorta. Mediastinal shed blood samples were drawn from 23 patients (group A) before the filter of the cardiotomy reservoir and from 24 patients (group B) behind. Additionally, both markers were measured in blood samples collected from the cell-saver. There were no significant differences between both groups (A and B) with regard to perioperative parameters. Mean loss of mediastinal shed blood in all patients was 207 +/- 127 ml within the first 6 h after operation. There was a positive correlation between CK activities and cTnI concentrations in serum and mediastinal shed blood, but shed blood contained significantly higher concentrations of cTnI as well as CK activities than the circulating blood after admission to the ICU and 6 h after unclamping the aorta. At both time points the cTnI-concentrations and CK activities in shed blood in group B were lower than those in group A but much higher than in serum. The effects of the use of a blood filter diminishes with time. Mediastinal shed blood contains extremely high cTnI concentrations and CK activities. Retransfusion of higher quantities of shed blood might lead to false-positive diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction.

Hemostatic Abnormalities in Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Pathophysiologic and Transfusion Considerations

Cardiac surgical procedures typically use cardiopulmo nary bypass (CPB), a technique that diverts blood from the heart and lungs, where it is oxygenated and pumped back into the circulation. CPB is associated with significant pathophysiologic changes leading to an increased bleeding risk. Bleeding during CPB occurs for multiple reasons; the primary reason is the expo sure of blood to the material components of the CPB system, with intense systemic coagulation and platelet, fibrinolytic, and endothelial activation. To counteract the coagulation activation, extremely high levels of heparin anticoagulation are required to prevent sys temic thrombosis. Thrombin generation through tissue factor pathway activation is now thought to be the predominant mechanism of coagulation activation in CPB. The stimulus for tissue factor exposure to blood is thought to be a systemic activation of tissue factor on monocytes and endothelial cells caused by comple ment activation by the CPB materials and circulating inflammatory mediators. Despite improvements in the CPB system, surgical techniques, and blood conserva tion methods, the demand for blood in such procedures remains sustantial. Optimal blood use can be achieved by combining blood conservation measures with the transfusion of blood components according to strict guidelines. Blood is a limited resource and must be used wisely and cautiously. The risks and costs associ ated with transfusion are compelling reasons to mini mize unnecessary exposure to blood. However, the bene fits of transfusion are well established, and the risks are reasonably low. New developments in the surfaces of the CPB system, use of established and new protease inhibitors, and new blood conservation measures offer promise in decreasing the bleeding risk associated with CPB.