Credentialling Australian critical care nurses: the pilot study

Implementation and utilisation of Australian critical care practice standards: What do we know?

BACKGROUND

The Australian College of Critical Care Nurses published the third edition of practice standards (PSs) for specialist critical care nurses in 2015. Higher-education providers currently use these standards to inform critical care curricula; however, how critical care nurses perceive and use PSs in clinical practice is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore critical care nurses' perceptions about the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses PS for specialty critical care nursing, to understand how the PSs are used in clinical practice, and what opportunities exist to support their implementation.

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative descriptive design was used. A purposive sampling strategy was used, with 12 critical care specialist nurses consenting to participate in semistructured interviews. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed thematically using an inductive coding approach.

FINDINGS

Three main themes were identified: (i) lack of awareness of the PS; (ii) minimal to no utilisation of the PS in clinical practice and the challenges contributing to this; and (iii) improving the implementation and utilisation of the PS in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant lack of awareness and utilisation of the PS in clinical practice. To overcome this, increasing recognition, endorsement, and valuation of the PSs to stakeholders at an individual, health service, and legislative level are suggested. Further research is required to establish relevance of the PS in clinical practice and understand how clinicians use the PS to promote and develop critical care nursing.

Critical care nurses' perceptions about their involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care

The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the perceptions of critical care nurses' (CCNs) actual and preferred levels of involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care in critical care areas. A convenience sample of CCNs was recruited from two centres (one public and one private) and a researcher generated survey distributed to participants. Of the 131 questionnaires distributed, 90 were completed, giving a response rate of 68.7%. Results showed that, although most CCNs believed that they had important information to contribute to decisions relating to patient care, less than half felt that they were actively involved in such decisions. They were aware of the legal limits to their scope of practice but, despite this, most admitted that they made decisions beyond these limits. Approximately three quarters of the respondents thought CCNs should not be making decisions beyond legal boundaries. On the whole, CCNs wanted to be more involved formally and to have more power in decisions regarding patient care. One way forward is for the CCNs to have an advanced practice role.