Radiologic placement of long-term central venous peripheral access system ports (PAS Port): results in 150 patients

Percutaneous implantation of peripherally inserted totally implantable venous access systems in the forearm in adolescent patients

BACKGROUND

Children with different underlying malignant diseases require long-term central venous access. As for port systems in a pectoral position, peripherally implanted port systems in the forearm revealed high levels of technical and clinical success in adult cohorts.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the technical and clinical outcomes of percutaneous central venous port implantation in the forearm in adolescents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 2010 and August 2020, 32 children ages 9 to 17 years with underlying malignancy received 35 totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) in the forearm. All venous port systems were peripherally inserted under ultrasound guidance. Correct catheter placement was controlled by fluoroscopy. As primary endpoints, the technical success, rate of complications and catheter maintenance were analyzed. Secondary endpoints were the side of implantation, vein of catheter access, laboratory results on the day of the procedure, procedural radiation exposure, amount of contrast agent and reasons for port device removal.

RESULTS

Percutaneous TIVAP placement under sonographic guidance was technically successful in 34 of 35 procedures (97.1%). Procedure-related complications did not occur. During the follow-up, 13,684 catheter days were analyzed, revealing 11 complications (0.8 per 1,000 catheter-duration days), Of these 11 complications, 7 were major and 10 occurred late. In seven cases, the port device had to be removed; removal-related complications did not occur.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral TIVAP placement in the forearms of children is a feasible, effective and safe technique with good midterm outcome. As results are comparable with standard access routes, this technique may be offered as an alternative when intermittent venous access is required.

Nephronophthisis and central veins abnormalities: A case report

Patients with genetic disorders are potentially more susceptible to present vascular abnormalities compared to the general population. For these patients, unusual difficulties could appear during a CVC placement procedure that could lead to major complications if venous abnormalities are undiagnosed. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance should be used routinely for all patients in order to avoid complications and catheter misplacement.

Outcome analysis in 270 radiologically guided implantations of totally implantable venous access ports via basilic vein

BACKGROUND

Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) are widely applied in patients who require chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, or frequent intravenous drug infusion. Although various venous access routes are possible for TIVAP insertion, the best method remains a topic of controversy. We present a single-center retrospective study of radiologically guided placement of TIVAPs through the basilic vein, with analysis of technical feasibility, patient safety, and device-related complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 270 patients who received TIVAP implantation through the basilic vein from November 2013 to July 2016, under imaging guidance by an interventional radiology team at our institution. Fluoroscopic images, chest radiographs, computed tomography scans, and medical records were reviewed after port implantation. Catheter maintenance days were calculated and catheter-related complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The procedural success rate was 99.3%. In total, 270 TIVAPs were implanted in 270 patients, of which 150 remained functional at the end of the study period. The total catheter maintenance days was 77 543 days, and the mean catheter indwelling duration was 287 ± 207 days. In 20 (7.4%) patients, TIVAP-related complications occurred during the follow-up period, resulting in a postprocedural complication rate of 0.26 incidences per 1000 catheter days. No significant relationship was observed between complications and gender (p = 0.188), age (p = 0.528), body mass index (p = 0.547), the type of primary malignancy (p = 0.914), or between the left and right basilic veins (p = 0.319).

CONCLUSION

Real-time ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance provides a safe method for TIVAP implantation through the basilic vein, with a high technical success rate and few device-related complications.

Micropuncture Access Set Use During Implantation of Totally Implantable Venous Access Device May Reduce Upper Extremity DVT Incidence Among Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes when using a micropuncture access set (MS) to those when using a conventional puncture set (CS) for implantation of totally implantable venous access device (TAVID).

METHODS

A total of 314 patients undergoing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer were included between June 2015 and July 2018. Of these, 123 (39.2%) received TAVID implantation using MS and 191 patients (60.8%) received TAVID using CS. Perioperative outcomes and complications were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, including body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, were not significantly different between the groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 25 patients (8.0%), and the rate and incidence of venous thrombosis were significantly higher in the CS group. There were no significant differences between the groups in other complications such as the rate of port site infection, deep vein thrombosis, obstruction, catheter dislocation, and skin complications (exposure). No incidence of catheter infection, port rotation, intraoperative bleeding, or pneumothorax was observed in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

MS is a safe and feasible procedure and results in less thrombosis. MS may play an important role in improving outcomes for the implantation of TAVID.

Advanced stage breast cancer is associated with catheter-tip thrombus formation following implantable central venous port placement

PURPOSE

Catheter-tip associated thrombosis is not uncommon in patients with implantable central venous ports; however, the prevalence and clinical impact of this complication on patient management is unclear. This study aims to identify risk factors for thrombus formation in a large population receiving serial echocardiograms (echo) following port placement.

METHODS

A total of 396 female breast cancer patients underwent internal jugular vein chest port placement between 2007 and 2013 and received echo studies every third month. Catheter tip position was measured from chest radiography and catheter associated thrombus was identified by echo.

RESULTS

Sixteen out of 396 patients (4%) had catheter-tip thrombus. No patients were symptomatic or prophylactically anticoagulated. Patients with thrombus were significantly younger than those without (46.4 years versus 53.4 years, respectively, p = 0.02) and had higher stage breast cancer with 75% versus 44.7% having stage III or IV cancer ( p = 0.017). Thrombus was identified after a median of 91 days. No significant difference was identified in anatomic ( p = 0.1) or measured ( p = 0.15) tip position, port laterality ( p = 0.86), or number of port lumens ( p = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort, younger patients and those with more advanced stage breast cancer were more associated with catheter-tip-related thrombus after port placement.

Central Venous Port Catheters: Evaluation of Patients' Satisfaction with Implantation under Local Anesthesia

Purpose

Evaluation of pain perception and patient satisfaction after implantation of a central venous port catheter system under local anesthesia.

Methods

A total of 100 consecutive patients (25 outpatients, 75 inpatients) who underwent successful implantation of a port catheter into the internal jugular vein from May through August 2007 were given an 8-item questionnaire. The extent of information about the implantation, the pain perception during implantation and the friendliness of the physician and nurse were evaluated. Furthermore, the patients were asked to assess their degree of anxiety and the pain they experienced during the intervention and to give an appraisal of whether local anesthesia was adequate. Each question was assessed on a 10–point scale (10 = very true to 1 = not at all true). In addition, the overall duration of the intervention (including patient preparation, implantation, patient aftercare, disinfection of the room) was documented.

Results

Patients felt highly satisfied with the way they were informed (mean score of 9.65) and considered the treating physician (9.89) and nurse (9.9) extremely friendly. Local anesthesia was rated as nearly completely adequate (9.56) and the degree of pain experienced was low (9.05; 10 = no pain). The average anxiety score was 8.56 (10 = not afraid at all). Overall satisfaction with the treatment was very high (9.62; outpatients: 9.72) and patients would recommend port catheter implantation at our department to others (9.77). The mean overall duration of the intervention was 76 min (range 40–120 min).

Conclusion

Positive patient reactions indicate that radiologic port catheter implantation under local anesthesia is a minimally invasive intervention with high patient satisfaction that can be performed on an outpatient basis and is a valid alternative to surgical implantation.

The K-port concept: Proposal for optimising a fully implantable port system

Objective. Typical reasons for the malfunction of implantable central venous catheters involve obstructions caused by blood clots, perforation through the skin, and contamination of the device. The objective of introducing this new port concept is to reduce the incidence of complications by making alterations to the design.

Design. The main characteristics of this new port chamber are its drop-shaped interior, which opens into the catheter-connecting piece rather like a funnel, the lateral position of the puncture membrane, and the exchangeable catheter connection device. As a result, the following improvements with regard to conventional port catheters are feasible.

Results. The puncture is made laterally next to the port chamber in a large, previously unstressed area of skin. The subcutaneous puncture channel can be used for a greater length of time so as to avoid ascending infections. In the event of an occlusion of the catheter, a wire can be pushed through the cannula to clean it. The puncture cannula lies against the skin and can be attached more readily. Various port chamber sizes can be combined with different catheter thicknesses to best meet the individual requirements of the patient.

Current Status. The afore-mentioned port system is still at a conceptional stage of development. There are no data on practical experiences with the K-port, as licensing details have yet to be agreed upon with a manufacturer. We have applied for a patent for this device.

Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan

BACKGROUND

We conducted a nationwide questionnaire-based survey to understand the current situation regarding central venous port implantation in order to identify the ideal procedure.

METHODS

Questionnaire sheets concerning the number of implantation procedures and the incidence of complications for all procedures completed in 2012 were sent to 397 nationwide designated cancer care hospitals in Japan in June 2013. Venipuncture sites were categorized as chest, neck, upper arm, forearm, and others. Methods were categorized as landmark, cut-down, ultrasound-mark, real-time ultrasound guided, venography, and other groups.

RESULTS

We received 374 responses (11,693 procedures) from 153 centers (38.5 %). The overall complication rates were 7.4 % for the chest (598/8,097 cases); 6.8 % for the neck (157/2325); 5.2 % for the upper arm (54/1,033); 7.3 % for the forearm (9/124); and 6.1 % for the other groups (7/114). Compared to the chest group, only the upper arm group showed a significantly lower incidence of complications (P = 0.010), and multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio 0.69; 95 % confidence interval 0.51-0.91; P = 0.008) also showed similar findings. Real-time ultrasound-guided puncture was most commonly used in the upper arm group (83.8 %), followed by the neck (69.8 %), forearm (53.2 %), chest (41.8 %), and other groups (34.2 %).

CONCLUSION

Upper arm venipuncture with ultrasound guidance seems the most promising technique to prevent complications of central venous port implantation.

Catheter Fracture and Embolization Associated with Arm Implantation of the Cook Vital Port

Purpose

To determine the frequency of arm port catheter fracture and embolization related to the Cook Vital Port Mini Titanium.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective audit of our Cerner Radiology Information System was performed between June 1, 2006, and June 30, 2011, to determine the number of Cook arm venous ports implanted and the frequency of foreign body retrievals related to catheter fracture for these arm ports.

Results

A total of 691 arm implantations of the Cook Vital Port during the 5-year time frame were analysed. Eleven of these patients (1.6%) required intravenous foreign body retrieval in the interventional radiology suite related to catheter fracture and embolization. Three of these fractured catheters were retrieved from the peripheral venous system upstream of the pulmonary circulation, whereas 8 embolized to the pulmonary arteries. All were successfully extracted with an intravenous snare by interventional radiology.

Conclusion

We discovered a 1.6% frequency of catheter fracture and embolization associated with arm implantation of the Cook Vital Port. All the catheters fractured at the vein entry site and did not detach from the port housing. The cause for catheter fracture and embolization is uncertain. Pulmonary embolization of the fractured catheters puts the patients at risk for possible further complications. No patients had ancillary complications related to catheter embolization or to catheter extraction procedures. Further investigation is required in an attempt to determine the circumstances that may result in catheter fracture and embolization related to this venous access device.

Clinical outcome after a totally implantable venous access port-related infection in cancer patients: a prospective study and review of the literature

Morbidity and mortality after a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP)-related infection in oncology patients have rarely been studied. We conducted this study to assess the incidence and factors associated with the following outcome endpoints: severe sepsis or septic shock at presentation, cancellation of antineoplastic chemotherapy, and mortality at week 12. We conducted a prospective single-center observational study including all adult patients with solid cancer who experienced a TIVAP-related infection between February 1, 2009, and October 31, 2010. Patients were prospectively followed for 12 weeks. Among 1728 patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy during the inclusion time, 72 had an episode of TIVAP-related infection (4.2%) and were included in the study (median age, 60 yr; range, 28-85 yr). The incidence of complications was 18% for severe sepsis or septic shock (13/72 patients), 30% for definitive cancellation of antineoplastic chemotherapy (14/46 patients who still had active treatment), and 46% for death at week 12 (33/72 patients). Factors associated with severe sepsis or septic shock were an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level and an infection caused by Candida species; 4 of the 13 severe episodes (31%) were due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Factors associated with death at week 12 were a low median Karnofsky score, an elevated Charlson comorbidity index, the metastatic evolution of cancer, palliative care, and an elevated CRP level at presentation. Hematogenous complications (that is, infective endocarditis, septic thrombophlebitis, septic pulmonary emboli, spondylodiscitis, septic arthritis, or organ abscesses) were found in 8 patients (11%). In conclusion, patients' overall condition (comorbidities and autonomy) and elevated CRP level were associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome after a TIVAP-related infection. Candida species and CoNS were responsible for severe sepsis or septic shock.

Peripherally inserted tunnelled catheters: a new option for venous access

We evaluated the feasibility and optimal technique for placing peripheral tunnelled central venous catheters. Fourteen peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) were placed using a 2-3 cm subcutaneous tunnel created in the upper arm. An additional 29 PICC lines containing a cuff were placed, using a slight modification of the same technique. Indications for placement were the same as those for a conventional PICC line. All catheters were placed successfully. There were no procedural complications. The upper arm basilic vein was used in all cases. Catheters remained in place for 1-70 days. Catheters in place for only a short period of time were removed at the bedside, longer-term catheters required a minimal amount of blunt dissection for removal of the cuff portion. We conclude that tunnelled catheters can be safely placed in the upper arm with a reliable technique. The ease of placement and lack of procedural complications, suggests that follow-up studies are warranted, to determine if these catheters can be used for applications currently requiring tunnelled subclavian or internal jugular catheters.

Scheme for creating a subcutaneous tunnel to place an indwelling implantable central venous access system in the forearm

We report a method that we have devised in which a secure subcutaneous tunnel is prepared during the placement of an indwelling central venous reservoir in the forearm. Subjects included 69 cases in which a procedure for implanting an indwelling reservoir in the forearm was performed between June 2006 and May 2007. For the subcutaneous tunnel, a 22-G Cathelin needle was advanced from the puncture site, turning toward the subcutaneous pocket side to the deep subcutaneous area. A 14-G Surflo IV catheter was then advanced along the 22-G Cathelin needle from the subcutaneous pocket. With the tip of the 14-G Surflo IV catheter emerging above the skin at the puncture site, the inner needle of the 14-G Surflo IV catheter and the 22-G Cathelin needle were removed. The catheter was passed through the outer 14-G Surflo IV catheter to emerge on the subcutaneous pocket site, then the outer needle of the Surflo catheter was also removed, and a connection to the port was made to create the subcutaneous tunnel. In all 69 cases, the subcutaneous tunnel in the forearm of the nondominant arm was successfully created within a short period of time (100% success rate). No problems were observed due to slack in the catheter until removal of the sutures 1 week later and for 3 months after treatment. With this method, we believe that a subcutaneous tunnel can be prepared in which the contained catheter has minimal freedom of movement, and which minimizes any damage induced by slack in the catheter within the subcutaneous tunnel.

Ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-guided insertion of chest ports

AIMS

To evaluate the results of ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous placement of internal jugular vein catheters and subcutaneous chest port system in patients with carcinoma.

METHODS

The data of 1418 patients in whom the devices were implanted from 2003 to 2007 in interventional radiology unit were evaluated prospectively.

RESULTS

The median age was 45 years (range 23-70), 658 were women and 760 were men. Technical success in implanting the devices was 100%. No instances of major complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, catheter tip malposition, air embolism were seen. The overall complication rate was 5%. Overall follow-up of patients was 699 074 catheter days with the mean function time of 493 (range 130-1215) days.

CONCLUSIONS

With the benefit of ultrasonography and fluoroscopy guidance, chest port systems can be implanted by interventional radiologists without major insertion complications and with a higher success rate than those reported in surgical placements.

A comparison between distal and proximal port device insertion in head and neck cancer

AIM

To compare technical feasibility and complications of radiologically arm port device implantation using arm venography exclusively (API-Group B) with chest port placement using cephalic vein cutdown (CVC-Group A), in advanced consecutive head and neck cancer patients (HNP).

METHODS

Port device placement was attempted in 225 consecutive HNP. Decision for inclusion in Group A or B was made first by the availability of the surgeon/radiologist to perform the procedure, second by contraindications of each technique. Patient transfer from one group to the other was recorded as well as technical feasibility, complications and device specific duration in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Technical success was statistically higher in Arm Port Group (99.1%) compared to Chest Port Group (75.2%). Device specific duration rate of the whole population was 53% (95%CI) [0.47-0.60] at 6 months, 44.1% (95%CI) [24.4-37.8] at 12 months and 8% (95%CI) [4.4-14.5] at 24 months. Median follow-up was 5.55 months (range: 0.032-9.6] in Group A versus 5.90 months [range: 0.06-27.6] (p=ns) in Group B. Complication rate was 15.9% in Group A versus 8.9% in Group B corresponding to a complication rate per patient-implantation-days of 0.66/1000 patient-days (A) versus 0.42/1000 patient-days (B). Premature port device explantation rate was 4.4% (A) versus 5.4% (B). Axillary and subclavian venous thrombosis was the main complication and occurred in 12 Group A patients and three Group B patients. Venous thrombosis rate was 0.37/1000 patient-days (A) and 0.13/1000 patient-days (B) (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

A few data exist about device insertion in HNP in whom venous cervical access is contraindicated. This comparative study demonstrates that both implantation techniques are safe and effective. The higher technical success rate with 0% heavy sedation, the lower venous thrombosis rate in the API group, and the 5.3% (A-B) patient transfer rate argue in favour of arm port placement in HNP. Indications for API include patients with an ipsilateral major pectoralis-myocutaneous flap, with radiodermatitis, tumour recurrence in the neck and upper chest, or with respiratory impairment.

Is radiologic placement of an arm port mandatory in oncology patients?

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was 2-fold: to evaluate a radiologically placed percutaneous arm port device (PRAPD) in a large series of 1000 consecutive cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (in terms of safety, efficacy, complications, and quality of life [QoL]) and to propose future recommendations.

METHODS

From 1998 to August 2002, all patients who had cancer required chemotherapy underwent insertion of a PRAPD and were prospectively included. All patients were followed for technical feasibility, overall device-related complications, and QoL.

RESULTS

Technical failures (6.3%) were caused by the inability to perform an arm venogram in 22 patients or to catheterize the brachial vein in 41 patients. Septic complications (3.2%) included septicemia (n = 7 patients), catheter sepsis (n = 9 patients), and febrile neutropenia (n = 16 patients). Mechanical complications (4%) included a twisted port (n = 2 patients), extravasation (n = 7 patients), catheter leaks (n = 7 patients), port obstruction (n = 7 patients), skin dehiscence of the port (n = 11 patients), catheter rupture and occlusion (n = 5 patients), and median nerve compression (n = 1 patient). Central venous thrombosis occurred in 12 patients (1.2%), and arm phlebitis occurred in 7 patients (0.7%). Procedure-related death occurred in 0.4%. Early port removal was performed in 5.3% of patients. Good QoL was reported at port removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRAPD was found to be safe, effective, and well tolerated in oncology patients. PRAPD could be recommended in selected patients instead of a surgical port device.

Pediatric vascular access

Pediatric interventional radiologists are ideally suited to provide vascular access services to children because of inherent safety advantages and higher success from using image-guided techniques. The performance of vascular access procedures has become routine at many adult interventional radiology practices, but this service is not as widely developed at pediatric institutions. Although interventional radiologists at some children's hospitals offer full-service vascular access, there is little or none at others. Developing and maintaining a pediatric vascular access service is a challenge. Interventionalists skilled in performing such procedures are limited at pediatric institutions, and institutional support from clerical staff, nursing staff, and technologists might not be sufficiently available to fulfill the needs of such a service. There must also be a strong commitment by all members of the team to support such a demanding service. There is a slippery slope of expected services that becomes steeper and steeper as the vascular access service grows. This review is intended primarily as general education for pediatric radiologists learning vascular access techniques. Additionally, the pediatric or adult interventional radiologist seeking to expand services might find helpful tips. The article also provides education for the diagnostic radiologist who routinely interprets radiographs containing vascular access devices.

Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

The present study is designed to evaluate and compare percutaneous radiologic arm port (R) and surgical subclavian port (S) devices in two homogeneous sets of breast cancer patients in terms of safety, efficacy, quality of life (QoL) and cost analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study involved a retrospective review of a prospective databank including 200 consecutive port device implantation attempted procedures performed over a 4-year period, in two similar groups of 100 breast cancer women who underwent either the surgical cephalic vein cutdown approach or the percutaneous basilic vein catheterization for intravenous adjuvant chemotherapy. Parameters analyzed included technical success, procedure duration, complications, QoL and cost evaluation for both techniques.

RESULTS

The success rate for port implantation was higher for R than for S placement (96% versus 91%). Mean implant duration time was 5.6 and 7.6 months for R and S, respectively. The overall complication rate was 10 and 16% for R and S, respectively. Mean implant duration time, without any complication or death, was 6.4 and 7.8 months for R and S, respectively. Six and seven percent for R and S, respectively, had to be removed prematurely. Both techniques exhibited very good QoL. Direct costs were respectively euro 230.8 and 219.1 for R and S, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The significant advantages of R over S include higher success rate, higher cosmetic results despite a 15% relative overcost for R placement. Both are indicated for breast cancer chemotherapy treatment, nevertheless R placement is mandatory in anxious patients who fear surgery, in case of previous cervico-thoracic irradiation or upper extremity venous thrombosis, or in patients at risk of respiratory insufficiency.

Infectious complications of implantable venous access devices in patients with sickle cell disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of implantable venous access device infection in patients with sickle cell disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective search of their hospital's information system from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2001 to identify hospital admissions with ICD-9 codes related to sickle cell anemia. This search yielded 2703 admissions in 293 patients. A search of the radiology information system identified 23 of these patients who had placement of an implantable venous access device. Excluding two patients who were lost to follow-up, the population of this study included eight men and 13 women aged 23 to 62 years old (mean, 37 years). A total of 30 implantable venous access devices (25 venous ports, five tunneled catheters) were placed by interventional radiologists. Cases of device infection were identified based on clinical data, microbiology, reports of device removal, and clinical follow-up. Infections were defined according to the Centers for Disease Control criteria for catheter-related bloodstream infection. The incidence of infection, organism, and time from device placement to infection was determined.

RESULTS

In 21 patients with 30 devices, 18 device infections (60%) occurred in 12 patients (57%) involving 15 venous ports and three tunneled catheters. There were a total of 12389 days of catheter use and a rate of 1.5 infections per 1000 catheter days. Infections occurred from 16 to 1542 days (mean, 349 days) after device placement. Blood, wound, and catheter tip cultures yielded solitary organisms in 13 cases and mixed organisms in four cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (59%). One patient was considered infected based on clinical signs and purulent discharge from the port site, despite negative cultures after partial antibiotic treatment. One patient died of sepsis resulting from an infected port.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a high incidence of infection associated with placement of implantable venous access devices in patients with sickle cell disease. Therefore, the authors avoid placing these devices in this patient population.

Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients

We investigated the risk factors for venous thrombosis in cancer patients with implantable ports undergoing chemotherapy. One hundred and seventy one ports were placed in a central ("chest ports") and 84 in a peripheral vein ("arm ports"), 181 received prophylactic nadroparin and 10 coumarin. Clinically overt thrombosis was confirmed by ultrasound or angiography. Catheter-related thrombosis incidence without anticoagulants was 28% in arm and 33% in chest ports, but with anticoagulants this was 32% in arm and only 1% in chest ports (odds ratio (OR) 34.8 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3-165). Left-sided placement compared with right-sided and catheter tip position in the superior vena cava compared with right atrium were associated with a 3.5 respectively 2.6-fold increased risk. Thrombosis was associated with elevated homocysteine levels (OR=3.8, 95% CI 1.3-11.3), but not with factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210A gene mutations, or high concentration of factor VIII, IX or XI. Prophylaxis with anticoagulants is recommended for chest, but not for arm ports. Determination of plasma homocysteine levels may identify patients at an increased risk for thrombosis.

Vascular access

Vascular access is the cornerstone of medical therapy in the pediatric population and presents unique challenges. The vessels are small, often exceedingly so, and gaining access may require considerable patience and skill. Peripheral IVs are difficult to place in children, both because of lack of patient cooperation and because of the very small size of many veins. In addition, repeated venipuncture has been identified as one of the greatest stresses in hospitalized children. In the recent past, all forms of central venous access were the preserve of surgeons and were placed in the operating room under general anesthesia. In recent years, pediatric interventional radiologists have described placing peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), subcutaneous venous access ports, hemodialysis catheters, and a variety of temporary and permanent central lines even in the smallest children. This has been achieved safely, reliably, and, by dispensing with general anesthesia and operating room time in most cases, at considerable cost savings to the entire health care system. In addition, new forms of reliable, stable access such as the PICC line have made possible outpatient treatment of a wide variety of conditions, particularly infectious, which previously necessitated hospital admission. This has resulted not only in considerable cost saving for the health care system but also improved quality of life for the patient and their family. In this section, I review the current state of pediatric vascular access with emphasis on those areas where pediatric differs from adult practice.

Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients

PURPOSE

To review image-guided chest port insertion using the right internal jugular vein as the access site of choice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and eighteen subcutaneous chest ports were placed via the internal jugular vein in 117 patients with malignancies using both fluoroscopic and US guidance in interventional radiology suites.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100% with no procedural complications. Follow-up was obtained in all patients with total access days of 40,450 days (mean, 342.8 days). Premature catheter removal was required in 8 patients (6.8%, 0.20 per 1,000 access days) due to non-treatable complications: 2 catheter occlusions/malfunctions (1.7%, 0.05 per 1,000 access days), 1 catheter-related skin erosion (0.85%, 0.024 per 1,000 access days), and 5 infections (4.2%, 0.15 per 1,000 access days). Two symptomatic right upper extremity venous thromboses also occurred (1.7%, 0.05 per 1,000 access days) that were treated successfully with anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided placement of internal jugular vein chest ports has a high success rate and low complication rate compared with reported series of unguided subclavian vein port insertion. The internal jugular vein should be used as the preferred venous access site compared to the subclavian vein.

Infectious complications of venous access devices

Infection represents one of the most common venous access device (VAD)-related complications requiring catheter removal. Recognition of such complications is essential to provide appropriate therapy in the setting of active infection. This article reviews the definition of various types of infections, as well as reviewing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of VAD-related infections.

Pediatric interventional venous access

Venous access for therapy in sick children is very important, but sometimes also extremely challenging. With several advances in imaging modalities, the interventional radiologist can certainly help in these situations. This article reviews the indications, technique, and complications related to short- (peripherally inserted central catheter) and long-term (central venous lines, Port-a-catheters) venous accesses in children. A brief commentary is also made about retrieval of fragmented lines.

Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study

PURPOSE

To determine the risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing placement of central (chest) versus peripheral (arm) ports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1996 and December 2000, a total of 440 implantable chest or arm ports were placed in 422 patients. Data pertaining to the first port placed for each patient was analyzed. Ports were placed for chemotherapy (n = 415) or blood transfusion (n = 7). Subset analysis was performed, taking into consideration whether patients received prophylactic or therapeutic doses of warfarin sodium (Coumadin), to determine if there was any difference in the incidence of DVT between patients undergoing some form of anticoagulation versus those undergoing none. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to determine outcome with reference to development of DVT.

RESULTS

In 273 chest ports placed, there were 13 (4.8%) instances of DVT; in 149 peripheral ports, there were 17 (11.4%). Censoring data on patients receiving some form of anticoagulation, the respective incidences were eight of 245 (3.3%) and 14 of 129 (10.9%). With use of Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests to examine comparisons of interest, the probability of thrombosis occurring over a period of 180 days was higher with peripheral ports irrespective of Coumadin use (P =.007 for all patients considered, P =.002 when analyzed only for those not receiving Coumadin). The difference in incidence of thrombosis for all ports between patients receiving Coumadin versus those not receiving Coumadin was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to chest ports, peripheral ports are associated with a significantly higher incidence of DVT.

Use of a peripherally implanted subcutaneous permanent central venous access device for chemotherapy--the Singapore General Hospital experience

BACKGROUND

Venous access for chemotherapy patients at the Singapore General Hospital has conventionally been via an externalised (Hickman) catheter. A peripherally implanted permanent subcutaneous central venous access device (P.A.S.Port) was introduced in 1996.

AIMS

We review its use, complications and cost competitiveness with other chemotherapy delivery systems.

METHODS

A retrospective study of clinical records was conducted with follow up interviews of patients and nursing staff.

RESULTS

Twelve patients had the P.A.S.Port inserted for administration of chemotherapy as an outpatient procedure. Immediate complications were pain (8%) and bruising (8%). One port-related infection (8%) one week following insertion was reported and one patient complained of interference with elbow movement as a late complication. Cost analysis was favourable for P.A.S.Port over an externalised Hickman catheter or chest-placed port at one year. Patient and nursing staff acceptance was high.

CONCLUSION

P.A.S.Port insertion is a safe outpatient procedure and is an alternative for permanent venous access.

Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients

PURPOSE

To perform a retrospective outcomes analysis of central venous catheters with peripheral venous access ports, with comparison to published data.

METHODS

One hundred and twelve central venous catheters with peripherally placed access ports were placed under sonographic guidance in 109 patients over a 4-year period. Ports were placed for the administration of chemotherapy, hyperalimentation, long-term antibiotic therapy, gamma-globulin therapy, and frequent blood sampling. A vein in the upper arm was accessed in each case and the catheter was passed to the superior vena cava or right atrium. Povidone iodine skin preparation was used in the first 65 port insertions. A combination of Iodophor solution and povidone iodine solution was used in the last 47 port insertions. Forty patients received low-dose (1 mg) warfarin sodium beginning the day after port insertion. Three patients received higher doses of warfarin sodium for preexistent venous thrombosis. Catheter performance and complications were assessed and compared with published data.

RESULTS

Access into the basilic or brachial veins was obtained in all cases. Ports remained functional for a total of 28,936 patient days. The port functioned in 50% of patients until completion of therapy, or the patient's expiration. Ports were removed prior to completion of therapy in 18% of patients. Eleven patients (9.9% of ports placed) suffered an infectious complication (0.38 per thousand catheter-days)-in nine, at the port implantation site, in two along the catheter. In all 11 instances the port was removed. Port pocket infection in the early postoperative period occurred in three patients (4.7%) receiving a Betadine prep vs two patients (4.2%) receiving a standard O.R. prep. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.9). Venous thrombosis occurred in three patients (6.8%) receiving warfarin sodium and in two patients (3%) not receiving warfarin sodium. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6). Aspiration occlusion occurred in 13 patients (11.7%). Intracatheter urokinase was infused in eight of these patients and successfully restored catheter function in all but two instances. These complication rates are comparable to or better than those reported with chest ports.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral ports for long-term central venous access placed by interventional radiologists in the interventional radiology suite are as safe and as effective as chest ports.

Importance of US findings in access planning during jugular vein hemodialysis catheter placements

PURPOSE

To evaluate the significance of internal jugular vein ultrasound (US) findings in long-term hemodialysis patients and to assess how frequently these findings lead to a change in access approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive hemodialysis catheter placements in 79 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Prior to catheter insertion, each patient underwent an US examination of the proposed access site by an interventional radiologist or interventional radiology fellow. The examinations were recorded on VHS tapes. The procedure notes, dictated radiology reports, and VHS tapes were reviewed for evidence of total occlusion, non-occlusive thrombus, presence of venous collaterals, stenosis, or variation in normal anatomy. The number of months that the patient required hemodialysis prior to catheter placement was also noted.

RESULTS

Significant US findings were present in 28 patients (35%). Findings included total occlusion (n = 18), non-occlusive thrombus (n = 11), stenosis (n = 5), and anatomic variation (n = 1). These required a change in access approach in 21 patients. Unexpectedly, 54% of the patients with US findings had been undergoing dialysis for 12 months or less.

CONCLUSION

These results underscore the importance of sonography in planning and performing vascular access procedures. A thorough US examination of the internal jugular veins is warranted prior to hemodialysis catheter placement, especially in patients with previous temporary or tunneled catheters. Three-quarters of patients with sonographic abnormalities required a change in access approach.

Internal jugular and upper extremity central venous access in interventional radiology: is a postprocedure chest radiograph necessary?

OBJECTIVE

The necessity of obtaining a postprocedure chest radiograph after central venous access using the upper extremity or internal jugular veins and interventional radiologic techniques was evaluated.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A prospective study of 937 consecutive central venous access procedures in interventional radiology using the internal jugular veins or upper extremities was performed from June 1995 through September 1997. Established interventional radiologic techniques were used to place various ports (n = 34) and tunneled (n = 670) and nontunneled (n = 233) catheters. All catheters were positioned using fluoroscopy and readjusted if necessary before termination of the procedure. Afterward, a chest radiograph was obtained with the patient upright to evaluate catheter position and possible procedural complications. Procedural complications and manipulations or interventions that resulted from the radiographic findings were noted. In addition, nursing time for acquisition of the chest radiograph was recorded.

RESULTS

We found seven procedural complications (four air emboli, two pneumothoraces, one innominate vein laceration) significant enough to alter the patient's treatment. These complications were apparent during the examination. Postprocedure chest radiography failed to reveal any unknown complications and revealed only one catheter sufficiently malpositioned to require manipulation. The amount of nursing time to acquire postprocedure chest radiographs ranged from 8 to 40 min (mean, 23 min) per patient.

CONCLUSION

When imaging guidance and interventional radiologic techniques are used for upper extremity and internal jugular central venous access, performing postprocedure chest radiography yields little benefit.

Sepsis

OBJECTIVES

To review infection and sepsis in patients with cancer and to provide an overview of controversies and research-based practices of infectious complications and management strategies.

DATA SOURCES

Research studies, review articles, web sites, and consensus documents.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional assumptions about infection and its optimal management are redefined by research regarding transfusion and catheter-related infections, prophylactic antibiotic administration, use of growth factors, and antimicrobial therapy regimens.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Infection is still the most common source of morbidity and mortality among cancer patients. The importance of recognizing high-risk patients, implementing infection prevention practices, and prompt intervention for infection symptoms has been established.

Incidence and management of catheter occlusion in implantable arm ports: results in 391 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and management of catheter occlusion in implantable arm ports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Findings were prospectively examined in 391 patients in whom 393 arm ports were placed. The indications for port placement included chemotherapy (n = 347), antibiotic administration (n = 35), combination chemotherapy/antibiotic use (n = 7), transfusion (n = 3), and phlebotomy (n = 1). Of the total catheters, 323 (82.2%) underwent tip modification prior to placement. Malfunctioning catheters were usually treated with urokinase instillation.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-three devices were implanted with 247 mean days of catheter use (total, 97,256 days; range, 1-694 days). The overall incidence of catheter occlusion was 0.14 per 100 catheter days. A single catheter occlusion occurred in 90 (22.9%) catheters, with a mean of 90.1 days before the event. A second occlusion occurred in 36 (9.2%) of the above catheters, with a mean of 60.1 catheter days before the second event. Eighty-five (24.0%) of the 347 cancer patients had at least one occlusive event, yielding a complication rate of 0.098 per 100 catheter days at risk (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.079-0.114). Of the 35 patients receiving antibiotics, three (8.6%) had at least one occlusive event. This represented a complication rate of 0.032 per 100 catheter days at risk (95% CI; 0.010-0.061). Seventeen (24.3%) of the nonmodified catheters developed an occlusion versus 72 (22.3%) of the modified (P > .05; Fisher exact test). Of the catheters with a first occlusive event, 75 (98.7%) were treated successfully with urokinase instillation. Four (1.0%) patients developed symptomatic subclavian vein thrombosis. No bleeding complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Catheter occlusion is a common complication of long-term arm port placement, with a significantly higher incidence in the cancer patients in our series (P <. 05, Fisher exact test). Catheter tip modification, however, does not considerably affect the incidence of occlusion. Low-dose urokinase therapy is a safe and efficacious treatment of catheter occlusion, obviating the need for catheter removal.

Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate function and assess incidence of complications relating to upper extremity implanted venous access devices placed in oncology patients primarily for chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors retrospectively evaluated the clinical course of 205 upper extremity implanted venous access devices placed with fluoroscopic and sonographic guidance in 204 patients during a 2-year period. All patients had a diagnosis of malignancy for which chemotherapy was planned. Follow-up data were collected by patient examination, direct evaluation of device function, as well as chart review and review of relevant imaging procedures. A modified technique for device placement is described.

RESULTS

The devices were placed successfully on the initial attempt in all cases. Clinical follow-up was obtained for 195 devices (95.1%) for a total device service period of 33,619 days (mean service interval = 169 days). Seventy-eight devices (40%) had service intervals greater than 180 days. Thirty-seven devices (19% of total devices) led to 39 complications (0.116 event/100 days). No immediate procedural complications were incurred. Eight complications occurred after 180 days of port service. Nineteen devices (9.7% of total devices followed) required removal as a result of complication. Common complications included port malfunction requiring urokinase to clear (n = 10; 0.030 event/100 days), ipsilateral upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (n = 9; 0.027), and local infection (n = 7, 0.021). A comparison of these results relative to other published series of similar devices placed for mixed indications is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Implanted venous access devices are an effective means of long-term venous access in oncology patients. Complication rates in this large series compared favorably to other published radiologic and surgical series. Analysis of complications in a subgroup of extended use implanted venous access devices (greater than 180 days follow-up) showed no statistically significant (P < .05) difference from the larger group of devices.

Epidemiology of device-associated infections related to a long-term implantable vascular access device

OBJECTIVE

To examine risk factors for, and determine the incidence of, device-associated infections among patients with an implantable vascular access device.

SETTING

Grady Health System, including a 1,000-bed, inner-city, public, teaching hospital and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), oncology, and sickle cell clinics in Atlanta, Georgia.

PATIENTS

123 consecutive patients who received a PAS-Port implantable venous access device between January 1 and June 30, 1995.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with follow-up > or = 1 year following device implantation.

RESULTS

Underlying illnesses included HIV infection in 66 patients (median CD4 count, 24.4 cells/mm3), malignancy in 51, and sickle cell disease in 6. Mean age of patients was 43.7 years, 50% were male, and 74% were black. Thirty-one (25%) of 123 patients developed a primary or device-associated bloodstream infection (BSI), and 3 of the 31 patients experienced two separate episodes of infection. The overall rate of infection was 1.23 primary BSIs per 1,000 device days. Patients with cancer had a lower rate of infection than those with HIV infection, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.96 vs 1.50 BSIs/1,000 device days; relative risk, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.26). Subgroup analysis of patients with different malignancies indicated that infection rates differed according to type of cancer, and there was a trend for heterogeneity across the different cancer strata (P=.06). Gram-positive pathogens accounted for 60% of the pathogens recovered. Six (19%) of 31 patients who developed an infection did so within the first 14 days after implantation. In 11 (32%) of the 34 BSIs, the port required removal; two patient deaths were attributed to device-associated bacteremias (0.072 deaths/1,000 device days).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one fourth of patients who had a vascular access device implanted developed a primary BSI, but the overall infection rate (per 1,000 device days) was relatively low, even among those with HIV infection. Primary BSI rates in patients with vascular access devices appeared to differ according to the specific underlying illness.

Infectious complications of 393 peripherally implantable venous access devices in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients

PURPOSE

To compare and investigate the rate of infection in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who have implantable venous access devices placed by interventional radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred ninety-one patients undergoing radiologically guided placement of peripheral arm ports were grouped according to their HIV serologic status. Findings were prospectively reviewed in 393 peripherally placed arm ports that were implanted in the basilic, cephalic, or brachial vein under fluoroscopic or sonographic guidance over a 4-year span. Infectious complications were categorized according to severity (local or systemic) and time (periprocedural or late).

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-three ports have been indwelling for a total of 97,256 patient days (range, 1-694; mean duration, 247 days). Among the 30 catheter placements in 29 HIV-positive patients with a total exposure time of 7,242 days, five (one local and four systemic) infections occurred, resulting in a 16.6% overall infection rate, yielding 0.069 infections per 100 catheter days at risk (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.032-0.127). In the remaining 362 HIV-negative patients, 27 (14 local and 13 systemic) infectious complications (7.4%) occurred, translating into 0.030 infections per 100 catheter days (95% CI, 0.021-0.042). The odds ratio of getting an infection from the implantable arm ports in the HIV-positive group was 2.5 times higher than that of the HIV-negative group. The relative risk was similar and was calculated to be 2.3. The P value was .084 (P < .05 required to be considered significant).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a significant difference in the infectious complication rate encountered in HIV-positive patients compared with the general population. However, the HIV-positive peripheral arm port infection rate compares favorably with the surgically placed catheters and ports. Many more arm ports in HIV-positive patients must be evaluated for the data to achieve an acceptable level of statistical significance.