Coagulation complicating cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia receiving the heparinoid, danaparoid sodium

Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic adverse drug reaction occurring in <0.1% to 7% of patients receiving heparin products depending on the patient population and type of heparin. Management of HIT is highly dependent on a sequence of tests for which clinicians may or may not have the results when care decisions need to be made. We conducted systematic reviews of the effects of management strategies in persons with acute HIT, subacute HIT A or B, and remote HIT. We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database through July 2019 for previously published systematic reviews and primary studies. Two investigators independently screened and extracted data and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We found primarily noncomparative studies and case series assessing effects of treatments, which led to low to very low certainty evidence. There may be little to no difference in the effects between nonheparin parenteral anticoagulants and direct oral anticoagulants in acute HIT. The benefits of therapeutic-intensity may be greater than prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation. Using inferior vena cava filters or platelet transfusion may result in greater harm than not using these approaches. Evidence for management in special situations, such as for patients undergoing cardiovascular interventions or renal replacement therapy, was also low to very low certainty. Additional research to evaluate nonheparin anticoagulants is urgently needed, and the development of novel treatments that reduce thrombosis without increasing hemorrhage should be a priority.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction mediated by platelet-activating antibodies that target complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Patients are at markedly increased risk of thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about diagnosis and management of HIT.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 33 recommendations. The recommendations address screening of asymptomatic patients for HIT, diagnosis and initial management of patients with suspected HIT, treatment of acute HIT, and special situations in patients with acute HIT or a history of HIT, including cardiovascular surgery, percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, renal replacement therapy, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations include use of the 4Ts score rather than a gestalt approach for estimating the pretest probability of HIT and avoidance of HIT laboratory testing and empiric treatment of HIT in patients with a low-probability 4Ts score. Conditional recommendations include the choice among non-heparin anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin, danaparoid, fondaparinux, direct oral anticoagulants) for treatment of acute HIT.

Cardiopulmonary Bypass Without Heparin

Due to familiarity, short half-life, ease of monitoring, and the availability of a reversal agent, heparin remains the anticoagulant of choice for cardiac operations requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, occasionally patients require CPB but should not receive heparin, most often because of acute or subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In these cases, if it is not feasible to wait for the disappearance of HIT antibodies, an alternative anticoagulant must be selected. A number of non-heparin anticoagulant options have been explored. However, current recommendations suggest the use of a direct thrombin inhibitor such as bivalirudin. This review describes the use of heparin alternatives for the conduct of CPB with a focus on the direct thrombin inhibitors.

Non-recovery of ACT in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II during mitral valve replacement using argatroban anticoagulation

Argatroban was used as the anticoagulant during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II undergoing mitral valve replacement. Dosage was reduced because of preoperative congestive liver disorder. Perioperative coagulability was poor, and, ultimately, failure of hemostasis led to a fatal outcome. Although argatroban use as an anticoagulant for HIT is reported, the optimal dose has not been established. During long-term CPB, increasing the total dosage may extend anticoagulant ability, leading to dose dependence. Because no antagonist for argatroban exists, failure of hemostasis might occur.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with danaparoid sodium after massive pulmonary embolism

During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, anticoagulation therapy is usually achieved with unfractionated heparin. We report on an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with danaparoid sodium for a patient with severe respiratory failure due to massive pulmonary embolism and suspected type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Danaparoid, a low molecular weight heparinoid, is an alternative to heparin for patients who develop type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Danaparoid was given at 400 IU/h with an objective of antifactor Xa activity of 0.6-0.8 U/mL, which was monitored twice a day. No excessive bleeding or clotting of the circuit was noted. The patient was weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after 9 days of treatment.

[Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment]

INTRODUCTION

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is due to the development of IgG antibodies specific to platelet factor 4. More frequently observed after administration of unfractionated heparin, this complication is characterized by a delayed decrease in platelet count (after the 5th day of treatment) associated with venous and/or arterial thromboses.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

It is often difficult to discard another potential cause for thrombocytopenia and to demonstrate by Elisa or platelet activation tests the presence of heparin-dependent antibodies is therefore mandatory in every patient. Withdrawal of heparin treatment is always necessary as well as the administration of an alternative antithrombotic agent. Danaparoid sodium (mixture of glycosaminoglycanes mainly with anti-Xa activity) or lepirudin (a recombinant hirudin with only antithrombin activity) are both recommended but these two drugs are associated with a significant risk of bleeding in case of renal failure. Oral anticoagulants such as coumadin can only be given when platelet count is normalized and if the clinical evolution is favorable. Potent antiplatelet agents (ilomedine or tirofiban) can be used in specific situations necessitating heparin such as extracorporeal circulation.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Early administration of coumadin for the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease efficiently prevent the occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which could disappear in the future with a wider use of the new antithrombotic agents, fondaparinux and ximelagatran.

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with a history of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) may be associated with complications related to their anticoagulation management.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and December 1999, among 4,850 adults patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our institution, 10 patients presented with preoperative type II HIT. In 4 patients, anticoagulation during CPB was achieved with danaparoid sodium. In 6 other patients, heparin sodium was used after pretreatment with epoprostenol sodium.

RESULTS

No significant change in platelet count occurred in any patient. No intraoperative thrombotic complication was encountered. Total postoperative chest drainage ranged from 250 to 1,100 ml in patients pretreated with epoprostenol and 1,700 to 2,470 ml in patients who received danaparoid sodium during CPB (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSIONS

During CPB, inhibition of platelet aggregation by prostacyclin may be a safe anticoagulation approach in patients with type II HIT.

Cardiopulmonary bypass in humans: bypassing unfractionated heparin

Seven anticoagulants besides unfractionated heparin have been used for human cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), mainly in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The collective experience with these alternative anticoagulants provides a perspective on current efforts aimed at improving CPB anticoagulation. Unfortunately, each alternative currently lacks a standard dosing schedule and a reliable method of monitoring the adequacy of its anticoagulant effect during CPB. Most also lack proven antidotes. Thus, unfractionated heparin remains the anticoagulant of choice for standard CPB.