[Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) : A medical-economic view]

BACKGROUND

In the context of inpatient and increasingly ambulatory thrombosis prophylaxis, heparins have been recognised as standard therapy for decades. In addition to the therapeutic benefit, therapy with heparins also entails the risk of undesirable side effects, such as bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT II) is deemed a serious side effect.

AIM

In the following work, HIT II is subjected to a medico-economic consideration (treatment, pharmaceuticals, subsequent costs due to possible complications) and, with regard to a possible HIT II prophylaxis, aspects of increasingly respected patient safety are also considered.

METHODS

In the context of a literature search the active ingredients argatroban and danaparoid, which are approved for HIT II treatment, were evaluated.

RESULTS

HIT II - especially in combination with thromboembolic complications - represents a medical-economic burden for the hospital. Although this is only an orientation guide, it shows that HIT II syndrome is not adequately cost-covered by the G‑DRG system. An early thrombosis prophylaxis with argatroban/danaparoid for HIT II risk patients should therefore be taken into account for medical-related as well as patient safety-relevant aspects. According to experience, the pharmaceutical supply for these medically needed products (anticoagulants) should be ensured for reasons of patient safety.

CONCLUSION

The risk of an immunological response to heparin therapy is known. Within the context of increased patient safety, thrombosis prophylaxis should be issued with a risk-adjusted prophylaxis.

Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

This article describes the pharmacology of approved parenteral anticoagulants. These include the indirect anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and danaparoid, as well as the direct thrombin inhibitors hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a unique pentasaccharide sequence and catalyze the inactivation of thrombin, factor Xa, and other clotting enzymes. Heparin also binds to cells and plasma proteins other than antithrombin causing unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and triggering nonhemorrhagic side effects, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. LMWHs have greater inhibitory activity against factor Xa than thrombin and exhibit less binding to cells and plasma proteins than heparin. Consequently, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, have a longer half-life than heparin, and are associated with a lower risk of nonhemorrhagic side effects. LMWHs can be administered once daily or bid by subcutaneous injection, without coagulation monitoring. Based on their greater convenience, LMWHs have replaced UFH for many clinical indications. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, catalyzes the inhibition of factor Xa, but not thrombin, in an antithrombin-dependent fashion. Fondaparinux binds only to antithrombin. Therefore, fondaparinux-associated HIT or osteoporosis is unlikely to occur. Fondaparinux exhibits complete bioavailability when administered subcutaneously, has a longer half-life than LMWHs, and is given once daily by subcutaneous injection in fixed doses, without coagulation monitoring. Three additional parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors and danaparoid are approved as alternatives to heparin in patients with HIT.

[Case of cardial varices rupture due to danaparoid sodium with portal venous thrombosis]

A 54-year-old man had been admitted to Nara city hospital because of hematemesis and dyspnea caused by physical exertion, and was given a diagnosis of esophago-cardial varices and portal venous thrombosis. He was transferred to our hospital for further examinations and treatments. Ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) revealed the progression of portal venous thrombosis. Danaparoid sodium was administered to treat the portal vein thrombus. 5 days later, the patient was found to have hematemesis resulting from a cardial varices rupture. After endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) was performed, danaparoid sodium was administered for 2 weeks. After the treatment, portal vein thrombus had almost disappeared. Due to an increased risk of bleeding, cases of esophago-cardial varices with portal venous thrombosis must be treated with care. This is the first report of upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to danaparoid sodium. Danaparoid sodium must be carefully administered when patients have portal venous thrombosis with delicate varices.

Management of allergy to heparins in postoperative care: subcutaneous allergy and intravenous tolerance

Itching erythematous or eczematous plaques around injection sites are quite frequent side effects of heparin treatment and are clinical symptoms of a delayed-type hypersensitivity to heparins. In most cases, changing the subcutaneous therapy from unfractionated to low molecular weight heparin or treatment with heparinoids does not provide improvement, due to extensive cross-reactivity. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that patients with delayed-type hypersensitivity to subcutaneously injected heparins tolerate intravenous application of heparin in controlled challenge tests. A patient with known delayed-type hypersensitivity to heparins received the heparinoid, danaparoid, subcutaneously for thrombosis prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery. After the first few injections, eczematous plaques developed; administration of the anticoagulant was continued and gradually resulted in generalized eczema despite treatment with topical and oral glucocorticoids. However, the patient required further anticoagulation. After discontinuation of subcutaneous injections and a switch to intravenous heparin, rapid improvement and clearing of skin lesions occurred. Therefore, in cases of delayed-type hypersensitivity to subcutaneously injected heparins, the switch from subcutaneous to intravenous heparin administration may be justified.

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia: pathogenetic, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in addition to bleeding complications are the most serious and dangerous side effects of heparin treatment. HIT remains the most common antibody-mediated, drug-induced thrombocytopenic disorder and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Two types of HIT are described: Type I is a transitory, slight and asymptomatic reduction of platelet count occurring during 1-2 days of therapy. HIT type II, which has an immunologic origin, is characterized by a thrombocytopenia that generally onset after the fifth day of therapy. Despite thrombocytopenia, haemorrhagic complications are very rare and HIT type II is characterized by thromboembolic complications consisting in venous and arterial thrombosis. The aim of this paper is to review new aspects of epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis and therapy of HIT type II. There is increasing evidence that platelet factor 4 (PF4) displaced from endothelial cells, heparan sulphate or directly from the platelets, binds to heparin molecule to form an immunogenic complex. The anti-heparin/PF4 IgG immune-complexes activates platelets through binding with the Fcgamma RIIa (CD32) receptor inducing endothelial lesions with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Cytokines are generated during this process and inflammation could play an additional role in the pathogenesis of thromboembolic manifestations. The onset of HIT type II is independent from dosage, schedule, and route of administration of heparin. A platelet count must be carried out prior to heparin therapy. Starting from the fourth day, platelet count must be carried out daily or every two days for at least 20 days of any heparin therapy regardless of the route of the drug administration. Patients undergoing orthopaedic or cardiac surgery are at higher risk for HIT type II. The diagnosis of HIT type II should be formulated on basis of clinical criteria and confirmed by in vitro demonstration of heparin-dependent antibodies detected by functional and antigen methods. However, the introduction of sensitive ELISA tests to measure anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies has showed the immuno-conversion in an higher number of patients treated with heparin such as the incidence of anti-heparin/PF4 exceeds the incidence of the disease. If HIT type II is likely, heparin must be immediately discontinued, even in absence of certain diagnosis of HIT type II, and an alternative anticoagulant therapy must be started followed by oral dicumaroids, preferably after resolution of thrombocytopenia. Further studies are required in order to elucidate the pathogenetic mechanism of thrombosis and its relation with inflammation; on the other hand large clinical trials are needed to confirm the best therapeutic strategies for HIT Type II.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) ar rare complications associated with use of unfractionate heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) HIT is a benign clinical condition characterized by a mil drop in platelet count with no clinical significance. HIT is an immune-mediated reaction associated with a wide spread "hypercoagulable" state resulting in arterial an venous thrombosis. There is a higher incidence of HIT with UFH use than with LMWH use. Orthopedic surger patients are at higher risk for developing HITT than are patients who receive prophylactic heparin for cardiovascular surgery or medical reasons. Therapy for patients suspected of having HITT should begin with immedi ate discontinuation of heparin in any form followed by pharmacologic inhibition with thrombin (e.g., recombinant hirudin [lepirudin], argatroban, danaparoid sodium).

Comparison of CR36, a new heparan mimetic, and pentosan polysulfate in the treatment of prion diseases

Sulfated polyanions, including pentosan polysulfate (PPS) and heparan mimetics, number among the most effective drugs that have been used in experimental models of prion disease and are presumed to act in competition with endogenous heparan sulfate proteoglycans as co-receptors for prion protein (PrP) on the cell surface. PPS has been shown to prolong the survival of animals after intracerebral perfusion and is in limited use for the experimental treatment of human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). Here, PPS is compared with CR36, a new heparan mimetic. Ex vivo, CR36 was more efficient than PPS in reducing PrPres in scrapie-infected cell cultures and showed long-lasting activity. In vivo, CR36 showed none of the acute toxicity observed with PPS and reduced PrPres accumulation in spleens, but had only a marginal effect on the survival time of mice infected with bovine spongiform encephalopathy. In contrast, mice treated with PPS that survived the initial toxic mortality had no detectable PrPres in the spleens and lived 185 days longer than controls (+55 %). These results show, once again, that anti-TSE drugs cannot be encouraged for human therapeutic trials solely on the basis of in vitro or ex vivo observations, but must first be subjected to in vivo animal studies.

Delayed thrombin generation is not associated with fibrinopeptide formation during prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass with hirudin anticoagulation

Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia urgently requiring surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) present a unique management challenge that must be addressed by the use of alternative anticoagulants. Although clinical success with the direct thrombin inhibitor hirudin has been reported, there is sparse information in the literature supporting the efficacy of this drug as an anti-thrombotic to prevent fibrin formation during CPB. In this report, we describe the efficacy of this drug to prevent thrombin-mediated fibrin formation during CPB.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). A report of 1,478 clinical outcomes of patients treated with danaparoid (Orgaran) from 1982 to mid-2004

Clinical outcomes of 1,478 danaparoid treatment case reports for HIT (involving 1,418 patients) treated between 1982 and mid-2004 are analysed. Treatment in 1,291 episodes was for current HIT. Thromboembolism due to HIT was present in 39.4%. The patients include 33 children and 32 pregnancies. Two hundred twenty-six patients required extra-corporeal circuit use for renal failure, 241 patients had a concomitant thrombophilic disorder, and 351 major operations were performed. Clinical outcomes were assessed during danaparoid treatment (range one day to 3.5 years) plus three months of follow-up. Of the danaparoid-treated patients 83.8% survived; 63.7% had no or minor adverse events and 20.1% suffered serious non-fatal adverse events. New thromboses occurred during 9.7% of treatment episodes, and 16.4% of treatment episodes had an inadequate treatment response (i. e. developed one or more of the following: new/extended thrombosis, persistent/new platelet count reduction, unplanned amputation during treatment and follow-up). Major bleeding was reported in 8.1% of treatment episodes. Clinical cross-reactivity of danaparoid (new/persistent platelet count reduction and/or new/extended thrombosis) was confirmed serologically in 23 of 36 patients with positive pretreatment serological danaparoid cross-reactivity and in 22 of 32 additional patients tested at the time of the new event, i.e. a total of 45 patients (3.2%). Clinical outcomes of these case reports of patients given danaparoid because of suspected or confirmed HIT appear to be comparable with those reported by others who used direct thrombin inhibitors, especially when a sufficient danaparoid dosing intensity was used in patients with isolated HIT. Post-operative bleeding limits danaparoid use for cardiopulmonary by-pass surgery. Routine clinical and platelet count monitoring are required to minimise adverse reactions due to cross-reactivity.

Treatment of 51 pregnancies with danaparoid because of heparin intolerance

Pregnant patients with acute venous thrombosis or a history of thrombosis may need alternative anticoagulation, when heparin intolerance occurs. Only limited data on the use of the heparinoid danaparoid are available in literature. We reviewed the use of danaparoid in 51 pregnancies of 49 patients identified in literature between 1981 and 2004. All patients had developed heparin intolerance (32 due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, 19 mainly due to heparin-induced skin rashes) and had a current and/or past history of thromboembolic complications. The initial danaparoid dose regimens ranged from 1000 to 7500 U/day administered s.c. or i.v.. The median duration of danaparoid use was 10 weeks. Danaparoid was used until delivery of a healthy infant in 37 pregnancies. In the remaining 14 pregnancies it was stopped earlier, because anticoagulant treatment was no longer required (3/14) or an adverse event led to a treatment discontinuation (11/14). Four maternal bleeding events were recorded during pregnancy, delivery or postpartum, two of them were fatal due to placental problems. Three fetal deaths were recorded, all associated with maternal complications antedating danaparoid use. Danaparoid cross-reactivity was suspected in 4 HIT patients and 5 non-HIT patients with skin reactions and was confirmed serologically in one of the two HIT patients tested. In none of five fetal cord blood- and three maternal breast milksamples anti-Xa activity transfer was observed. In conclusion danaparoid can be used as an alternative antithrombotic agent in pregnant women with high thrombotic risk and intolerance to heparins.

Eczematous plaques related to unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnancy

The use of low-molecular-weight heparin has been expanded to prevent pregnancy complications such as pregnancy loss, intra-uterine growth restriction and severe early-onset pre-eclampsia in high-risk patients with evidence of acquired or congenital thrombophilia. Therefore, the number of patients with side effects from low-molecular-weight heparin is expected to increase. We describe two women with infiltrating patchy plaques that developed in reaction to low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy. In the first patient, a switch to other formulations of heparin and heparinoid failed; the second patient, however, did well when enoxaparin was replaced with dalteparin. This report confirms the risk of skin reactions to enoxaparin and dalteparin, and reports on a skin reaction associated with danaparoid sodium in a pregnant woman.

Danaparoid for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an analysis of treatment failures

BACKGROUND

Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) (with or without thrombosis) require alternative anticoagulation because of their extreme risk of new thromboembolic complications. The first effective agent for this purpose may be danaparoid, a less-sulfated low molecular weight heparinoid. Recently, direct thrombin inhibitors have been used.

OBJECTIVE

Five HIT patients, who developed new thromboembolic complications while receiving danaparoid, were analyzed to consider possible reasons for treatment failure and to promulgate strategies that improve efficacy.

RESULTS

Three patients had acute HIT, one had recent HIT, and one with remote HIT was re-exposed to heparin during heart surgery. Danaparoid was started as intravenous bolus and infusion in one patient, and as 1250 units subcutaneously twice daily in four patients. The new complications that emerged on danaparoid were new venous thrombi in three patients (one with pulmonary emboli), lower extremity arterial thrombosis in one, myocardial ischemia in one, thromboembolic cardiovascular accidents in one, and fatal bowel necrosis in one (two patients suffered more than one complication). Platelet counts did not improve or worsened in four, improved partially in the other, and parameters of disseminated intravascular coagulation failed to improve in one patient. Four patients responded relatively dramatically when direct thrombin inhibitors were substituted. Possible reasons for danaparoid failure include that: 1) no treatment is expected to completely prevent complications, 2) antithrombin III consumption can blunt efficacy in some patients, 3) low or intermediate doses may be insufficient, and 4) there was clinically significant cross-reactivity of the pathogenic HIT antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

It is emphasized that the possibility of clinically significant antibody cross-reactivity and that low or intermediate dosage may be inadequate when using danaparoid in therapy of HIT. The latter problem probably extrapolates to other anticoagulants used for HIT.

Danaparoid: a review of its use in thromboembolic and coagulation disorders

Danaparoid (danaparoid sodium) is a low molecular weight heparinoid which has undergone clinical study for use as continued anticoagulant therapy in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), for the prophylaxis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and for the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). A nonblind study in patients with HIT has reported that complete clinical resolution is significantly more likely in patients receiving danaparoid than in patients receiving dextran 70. In addition, retrospective analyses and noncomparative data support the use of danaparoid for continued anticoagulant therapy in patients with HIT. Studies in patients undergoing hip surgery have shown that danaparoid significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative DVT compared with aspirin, warfarin, dextran 70 and heparin-dihydroergotamine, while additional data suggest no difference between danaparoid, enoxaparin and dalteparin. In patients undergoing abdominal or thoracic surgery for removal of a malignancy, danaparoid reduced the incidence of postoperative DVT compared with placebo, but showed no significant difference when compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Two studies have compared danaparoid with UFH in the prophylaxis of DVT following acute ischaemic stroke; twice daily danaparoid was significantly superior to UFH whereas there was no significant difference between a once-daily dosage and UFH. Danaparoid did not differ from UFH in terms of efficacy in the treatment of existing DVT. In all comparative studies examining the efficacy of danaparoid in the prophylaxis or treatment of DVT (versus warfarin, dextran 70, enoxaparin, dalteparin, aspirin, heparin-dihydroergotamine, UFH and placebo), the incidence of haemorrhagic complications did not differ between treatment groups. In patients with DIC, 61.9% of those patients receiving danaparoid experienced either disappearance or reduction of symptoms of DIC whereas 62% of those receiving UFH showed either no change or aggravation of their symptoms. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in tolerability or overall improvement of DIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Danaparoid is an effective anticoagulant agent which has undergone clinical evaluation in a wide range of disease indications. Current guidelines support the use of danaparoid in prophylaxis of DVT following ischaemic stroke, and in patients who develop HIT. Danaparoid has shown efficacy in DIC, and for DVT prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip surgery although further data are required to establish the role of danaparoid in these indications. In particular, double-blind trials comparing danaparoid with such recommended therapies as the low molecular weight heparins will provide more definitive data on the place of danaparoid in the clinical management of these conditions and ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes.

Heparan sulfate in the treatment of intermittent claudication: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is by far the most common cause of intermittent claudication. This disease can greatly reduce the affected individual's walking capacity and can seriously affect daily life activities. Few therapeutic options are aimed at improving walking capacity. This was a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, performed in 24 Italian centers. Two hundred seventeen patients with intermittent claudication (stages IIa and IIb of Fontaine's PAD classification) were randomly assigned to heparan sulfate (40 mg orally twice a day) or placebo for 6 months. The primary end-point was an increase in pain-free walking distance [initial claudication distance (ICD)] during the 24 weeks of treatment. The pain-free and the absolute walking distance (ACD) were monitored by standardized treadmill test at baseline and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks. The change in initial claudication distance during treatment, expressed as integrated change over time, was significantly greater with heparan sulfate than with placebo (306 +/- 494 vs. 250 +/- 510 meters x months, p = 0.019). Significantly fewer treated patients worsened during treatment (decreased initial claudication distance) compared with controls (9.1% vs. 19.6%; p = 0.027). Functional recovery in the most severely affected subgroup of patients (stage IIb of Fontaine's classification) was more clearly detected and significantly greater among treated than among control patients (absolute increase in ICD: 70 +/- 113 vs. 58 +/- 172 meters, p = 0.028; integrated increase: 304 +/- 422 vs. 208 +/- 503 meters x months; p = 0.004). Heparan sulfate appeared to increase the walking capacity of patients with intermittent claudication to a significantly greater extent than did placebo. The treatment was well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetic studies of dalteparin (Fragmin), enoxaparin (Clexane), and danaparoid sodium (Orgaran) in stable chronic hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and danaparoid are an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UH) for anticoagulation during hemodialysis. Few data are available concerning their duration of action and whether drug accumulation occurs with continued use. We performed a prospective randomized study of the pharmacokinetics of dalteparin and enoxaparin plus danaparoid in 21 hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to administration of enoxaparin, 40 mg; dalteparin, 2,500 U; or danaparoid, 34 U/kg, for 4 weeks. Antifactor Xa levels were measured at the end of weeks 1 and 4 immediately before the injection and at prescribed intervals up to 48 hours postinjection.

RESULTS

No bleeding or thrombotic episodes occurred during the study. Mean antifactor Xa activities 4 hours postinjection were 0.2 +/- 0.035 (SEM), 0.38 +/- 0.028, and 0.54 +/- 0.051 U/mL week 1 and 0.26 +/- 0.038, 0.40 +/- 0.055, and 0.64 +/- 0.050 U/mL week 4 for dalteparin, enoxaparin, and danaparoid, respectively. Both weeks 1 and 4, antifactor Xa activity 3 hours postdose was significantly greater for danaparoid sodium compared with enoxaparin and dalteparin. There were no significant differences between antifactor Xa activity week 4 versus week 1 for enoxaparin and dalteparin; however, danaparoid sodium levels during dialysis were significantly greater after 4 weeks of treatment (P = 0.0328, 1 hour; P = 0.003, 2 hours; P = 0.0128, 3 and 4 hours).

CONCLUSION

Dalteparin and enoxaparin provide adequate anticoagulation for hemodialysis using single bolus injections at relatively low doses. Danaparoid sodium at the current recommended dosage resulted in greater anticoagulation than enoxaparin or dalteparin and may have an

Development of a high-pressure liquid chromatography method for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Owing to the disadvantage of radioactivity of the carbon 14 serotonin release assay and the time-consuming procedure of the enzyme immunoassay, we developed a high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method to detect serotonin released from donor platelets in the presence of heparins and serum samples from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Samples were analyzed from 60 healthy control subjects, 19 patients with HIT, and 20 patients without HIT after incubation with heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and danaparoid. Serotonin release was measured from platelets, 300 x 10(3)/microL, by HPLC. Serotonin eluted as a single peak from the HPLC column. Serum samples from patients with HIT released 5.5 to 352.5 and 6.6 to 1,533.3 ng/mL of serotonin from platelets in the presence of 0.2 IU/mL of heparin and LMWH, respectively. In the presence of 0 IU/mL of heparin, LMWH, danaparoid, and control samples, less than 2.5 ng/mL of serotonin were released. The HPLC method permits a rapid, sensitive, and quantitative determination of serotonin released from donor platelets for laboratory confirmation of HIT.

Lifesaving citrate anticoagulation to bridge ineffective danaparoid [correction of to bridge to danaparoid] treatment

A case of successful regional anticoagulation with trisodium citrate in a patient who developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia while on continuous hemofiltration is described. Immediate citrate anticoagulation allowed for maintenance of extracorporeal circulation until effective danaparoid therapy could be established. Recommended plasma antifactor Xa levels for hemodialysis may be inadequate in some cases. Values similar to those in use during cardiopulmonary bypass could be required.

[Delayed hypersensitivity to heparins and heparinoids]

Delayed hypersensitivity to heparins and heparinoïd is a problem for prophylaxis of thrombo embolic diseases. The hirudins did not seem to have any cross-reactivity with the two others groups of anticoagulants. We present two clinical cases of delayed type reactions to heparins and heparinoïd and we reviewed the literature about adverse reactions to low molecular weight heparins and the alternative possibilities.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome: in vivo cross-reactivity with danaparoid and successful treatment with r-Hirudin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) is an immune-mediated drug reaction that occurs 5-14 d after initiation of heparin therapy and is a potentially life-threatening thrombotic complication. The antibody-heparin-PF4 complexes cause platelet activation and generation of platelet microparticles. The need for anticoagulant treatment in asymptomatic thrombocytopenia is uncertain. However, treatment is warranted in HITTS, as illustrated in the case reported here. Danaparoid, r-Hirudin and argatroban are effective drugs. Danaparoid has a 10-50% in vitro cross-reactivity rate with the HIT antibodies, but has been proven to be clinically efficacious even in these cases. Here, we report a case of in vivo cross-reactivity with danaparoid, the patient showed an excellent recovery with r-Hirudin.

[Thrombopenia increased by heparin and danaparoid]

Pathogenesis, frequency, and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia are well-known. They may be related with both unfractioned heparin and low-molecular weight heparin. Suspected heparin must be discontinued as soon as the diagnosis is established. Orgaran (danaparoid sodium) may be used for management of patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopaenia but can itself be associated with a thrombocytopaenia. Our case report allows us to catch in mind such a crossed complication.

Delayed-type skin reaction to the heparin-alternative danaparoid

Eczematous, infiltrated plaques at the site of subcutaneously administered heparin appear to be common. Heparinoids cannot be recommended in general as a substitute for heparin or low molecular weight heparin because delayed-type skin reactions to these molecules can also occur, as demonstrated in this case report.

Use of danaparoid sodium (Orgaran) as an alternative to heparin sodium during cardiopulmonary bypass: a clinical evaluation of six cases

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has become more prevalent in today's cardiac setting and has resulted in the need for alternative anticoagulant therapies. Danaparoid sodium, one alternative to heparin, has been used in six cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in this hospital. This clinical experience has resulted in the progressive refinement of a protocol for the 'safe' clinical use of danaparoid sodium. Although there were six positive outcomes with the use of danaparoid sodium, alternatives must be explored in order to find the optimal anticoagulant for the treatment of HIT.

In vitro cross-reactivity of danaparoid sodium in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II undergoing cardiovascular surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the cross-reactivity of danaparoid sodium in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective investigation.

SETTING

A major European heart center and university hospital.

PATIENTS

81 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery during the period between January 1998 and April 1999 and were diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) II.

INTERVENTIONS

Testing was performed in patients who revealed a decrease in the platelet count >30% or a platelet count <100,000/microL during heparin therapy. Testing for HIT was performed by the use of the heparin-induced platelet-aggregation assay. Patients were evaluated as positive if an agglutination occurred in two of four of the 0.2 IU/mL heparin chambers. Patients were judged to be cross-reactive with danaparoid sodium when an agglutination occurred in two of four chambers that contained 0.2 IU/mL Orgaran.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

281 patients (5.4% of the patients who underwent surgery during the period of the investigation) were tested for HIT II. Of these, 81 (1.5% of the total) gave a positive heparin-induced platelet-aggregation assay and 23 (28%) revealed a cross-reactivity with danaparoid sodium.

CONCLUSION

Cross-reactivity with heparin-induced platelet antibodies occurred in 28% of the patients who tested positive for heparin-platelet antibodies. In these patients, Orgaran would not have been a safe option. In patients with HIT II undergoing cardiac surgery, cross-reactivity with danaparoid sodium must be excluded before initiation of therapy with Orgaran, otherwise, or in cases of cross-reactivity, other options such as r-hirudin are preferred.

Danaparoid sodium

Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran, Organon) is a heparinoid glycosamino-glycuronan antithrombotic agent approved for the prophylaxis of post-operative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery. Danaparoid is a low molecular weight heparinoid consisting of a mixture of heparan sulphate (84%), dermatan sulphate (12%) and small amounts of chondroitin sulphate (4%), whose antithrombotic activity has been well established. Its pharmacological effect is exerted primarily by inhibiting Factors Xa (FXa) and IIa (FIIa) at a ratio greater than heparin, with a minimal effect on platelet function. Danaparoid exhibits low cross-reactivity with heparin-induced antibodies when compared with heparin or low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), thereby making it an excellent choice for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). It has excellent bioavailability following s.c. injection. Danaparoid has little effect on routine coagulation tests (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], prothrombin time [PT], and thrombin time [TT]). Patients with elevated serum creatinine should be monitored carefully. For its FDA approved indication (DVT prophylaxis during hip replacement surgery), its cost per day is approximately eight times more than LMWH. Even though monitoring is not routinely necessary according to the manufacturer for its approved indication, monitoring is frequently necessary when it is used in other clinical scenarios. Its higher cost than comparable therapies for DVT prophylaxis and the low availability of the FXa assay in most non-tertiary care hospitals has limited the widespread use of danaparoid. Danaparoid has been found to be effective in the treatment of HIT although this is an off label use, despite being the most frequent reason why danaparoid is used.

Thromboprophylaxis in hip fracture surgery: a pilot study comparing danaparoid, enoxaparin and dalteparin. The TIFDED Study Group

A pilot study was performed to compare the thromboprophylactic effect of danaparoid, enoxaparin and dalteparin in patients with hip fracture. The study was a prospective, randomised assessor-blind, four-centre trial. Prophylaxis was given for 9-11 days, whereafter bilateral phlebography was performed. A total of 197 patients were randomised. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of deep vein thrombosis, in blood loss or bleeding complications between the three prophylaxis groups. In conclusion, this moderately sized study revealed no statistically significant difference in efficacy or safety between danaparoid, enoxaparin and dalteparin in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Association of heparin-induced skin lesions, intracutaneous tests, and heparin-induced IgG

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous heparin-induced allergic reactions to subcutaneous heparin may begin 2-5 days after administration. The relation of the delayed-type hypersensitivity and a systemic immunologic response is controversial. The present investigation aimed to analyze the occurrence of thromboembolic complication, pathologic heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA), and the presence of circulating heparin-induced IgG in patients with heparin-induced skin reactions.

METHODS

Intracutaneous tests, HIPA assay, and heparin-heparin IgG antibodies were performed in nine patients with heparin-induced skin lesions.

RESULTS

Six of eight patients showed positive intracutaneous tests to heparin and to four low-molecular-weight heparins. Three of six heparin-positive patients presented hypersensitivity to a heparinoid, too. Two of three patients had a positive HIPA test and elevated heparin-induced IgG antibodies. Both patients developed complications presenting as heparin-induced skin necrosis or arterial thrombosis. Two of nine patients were treated with danaparoid, 4/9 patients received r-hirudin, and 1/9 received oral coumarin. In 2/9 patients, anticoagulant therapy was stopped, but these patients will receive r-hirudin if indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the coincidence of local and systemic hyperreactivity to heparin and danaparoid, patients with heparin-induced skin lesions should receive r-hirudin, a nonheparin compound, for anticoagulant treatment.

Low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (danaparoid), and outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators

CONTEXT

Anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin is used commonly for treatment of acute ischemic stroke, but its use remains controversial because it has not been shown to be effective or safe. Low molecular weight heparins and heparinoids have been shown to be effective in preventing deep vein thrombosis in persons with stroke, and they might be effective in reducing unfavorable outcomes following ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether an intravenously administered low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (danaparoid sodium), increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome at 3 months after acute ischemic stroke.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Between December 22, 1990, and December 6, 1997, 1281 persons with acute stroke were enrolled at 36 centers across the United States.

INTERVENTION

A 7-day course of ORG 10172 or placebo was given initially as a bolus within 24 hours of stroke, followed by continuous infusion in addition to the best medical care. Doses were adjusted in response to anti-factor Xa activity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Favorable outcome rated as the combination of a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of I or II and a modified Barthel Index of 12 or greater on a scale of 0 to 20 at 3 months or 7 days; very favorable outcome was recorded for the combination of a Glasgow Outcome Scale of I and a Barthel Index of 19 or 20 at 3 months or 7 days.

RESULTS

At 3 months, 482 (75.2%) of 641 persons assigned to treatment with ORG 10172 and 467 (73.7%) of 634 patients treated with placebo had favorable outcomes (P=.49); 49.5% and 47%, respectively, of patients in each group had very favorable outcomes at 3 months. At 7 days, 376 (59.2%) of 635 persons given ORG 10172 and 344 (54.3%) of 633 receiving placebo had favorable outcomes (P=.07). For the same interval, 215 (33.9%) of 635 persons given ORG 10172 and 176 (27.8%) of 633 persons administered placebo had very favorable outcomes (P=.01; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.73). Within 10 days of onset of treatment, serious intracranial bleeding events occurred in 14 patients given ORG 10172 (15 events) and in 4 placebo-treated patients (5 events) (P=.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite an apparent positive response to treatment at 7 days, emergent administration of the antithrombotic agent, ORG 10172, is not associated with an improvement in favorable outcome at 3 months.

Danaparoid. A review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Danaparoid, a low molecular weight heparinoid consisting of a mixture of heparan, dermatan and chondroitin sulfates, has well established antithrombotic activity. The drug has a high antifactor Xa to antifactor IIa (thrombin) activity ratio, a low tendency to cause bleeding and minimal effects on the fibrinolytic system. Danaparoid has a low cross-reactivity rate with heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies (0 to 20%; mean approximately 10%). This represents a significant advantage over low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) as a potential replacement agent for unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with immune-mediated (type II) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In a worldwide compassionate-use programme involving a total of 667 patients with HIT to date, 93% of danaparoid treatment courses were considered to be successful. Thrombocytopenia resolved in 91% of episodes. In a multicentre randomised comparative trial of danaparoid and dextran in patients with HIT plus thrombosis (HITT), significantly more danaparoid than dextran recipients had resolution of thromboses, and an effective clinical response was achieved in significantly more danaparoid recipients. Results of a retrospective case-controlled study of danaparoid and ancrod in patients with HITT showed significantly fewer new or progressive thromboses with danaparoid. In the compassionate-use programme, danaparoid was associated with a mortality rate of 10.4% during treatment (up to 3.5 years) and 7.8% during the follow-up period (3 months). 14 of 114 deaths during the follow-up period were considered to be related to danaparoid therapy. A mortality rate of 23.5% was reported in patients accepted for but not treated with, danaparoid. Mortality rates with danaparoid, ancrod and dextran in the comparative studies were similar (7, 11 and 12%, respectively). Severe bleeding was reported in 3.1% of patients in the compassionate-use programme, persistent or recurrent thrombocytopenia in 2.6% and new thromboembolic events/extension of existing thrombosis in 1.7%. The incidence of bleeding was similar with danaparoid and dextran in a comparative trial. Although in vitro cross-reactivity does not always translate into clinical cross-reactivity, testing is currently recommended, when possible, before initiation of danaparoid therapy. Thus, danaparoid appears to be an effective and well tolerated replacement agent for UFH in many patients with HIT who require further anticoagulation. The drug has low cross-reactivity with HIT-associated antibodies. Further comparative trials are needed to confirm these promising findings.

Design of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST)

TOAST is a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial testing the usefulness of a new antithrombotic drug in improving the outcome of persons with acute ischemic stroke. Until recently, no clinical trial testing a treatment for ischemic stroke had demonstrated efficacy in outcome. Design problems of previously conducted trials with inconclusive results may partly explain their failures. During the design of TOAST, the investigators addressed several issues so the trial could test the treatment accurately. We report the strategies used in designing, implementing, and coordinating the trial.

[Effectiveness and tolerability of heparan sulfate in the treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis. Controlled clinical study vs sulodexide]

One of the most interesting glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) is heparansulphate, known as the physiological activator of antithrombin III and involved in the maintenance of the antithrombotic potential of uninjured endothelium. The aim of our study was to evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of heparansulphate with respect to sulodexide, another GAG suitable for the treatment of venous diseases. The study was performed in a open-label, controlled, with parallel and randomized groups, design. Thirty patients (aged 32-72 years) suffering from superficial thrombophlebitis were treated for two weeks with heparansulphate 100 mg t.i.d. or sulodexide 250 LSU b.i.d., both given orally. Some coagulative and fibrinolytic parameters (PT; aPTT; fibrinogen; euglobulin lysis time; t-PA; PAI-1; ATIII; alpha 2-antiplasmin; D-Dimer and platelets count) were assayed at the beginning and at the end of the study. Moreover signs and symptoms of disease (skin trophism; local pain; itch and oedema) were assessed. Heparansulphate and sulodexide were able to reduce signs and symptoms with similar degree and to significantly modify t-PA, alpha 2-antiplasmin and ATIII levels without any difference between treatments. Our issues show that heparansulphate can be useful in superficial thrombophlebitis management.

Danaparoid sodium lowers proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy

Diabetic nephropathy is a progressive renal disease with thickening of the glomerular basement membrane and mesangial expansion and proliferation as histological hallmarks. The presence of the glycosaminoglycan side chains of heparan sulfate proteoglycan, an important constituent of the glomerular basement membrane, is decreased in diabetic nephropathy proportionally to the degree of proteinuria. Danaparoid sodium is a mixture of sulfated glycosaminoglycans consisting mainly of heparan sulfate. The study presented here involved performing a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study with danaparoid sodium in diabetic patients with overt proteinuria. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect on proteinuria and safety/tolerability. Nine patients completed the study, without major side effects; the crossover study consisted of two 6-wk periods of treatment with 750 anti-Xa units danaparoid sodium subcutaneously once-daily or placebo. Following danaparoid sodium, significant declines of both albuminuria and proteinuria were found. After danaparoid sodium, the albumin excretion ratio standardized for urinary creatinine reduced with 17% in comparison with an increase of 23% after placebo (95% confidence interval of the difference,-75.9-3.9%; P = 0.03). The percentage change of the urinary protein excretion corrected for urinary creatinine differed at 8 wk significantly between both treatment arms (P = 0.001). Additional parameters for safety as hematological, hemostasis, biochemical parameters, and fundusphotography did not show any clinically significant difference for both groups. Only two patients had minor skin hematomas at the injection site while using danaparoid sodium. In conclusion, the supplementation was found to be feasible and was not associated with side effects. A significant decline of proteinuria was found. More prospective dose-finding and long-term studies must be performed to see whether danaparoid sodium could not only induce a reduction of proteinuria but also halt the progression of renal disease.

Thromboembolic complications in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) showing cross-reactivity to a low molecular weight heparin-treatment with Org 10172 (Lomoparan)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an immuno-mediated life-threatening side effect of heparin therapy which poses difficulties in diagnosis and major therapeutic problems. Heparin must be instantly discontinued. We describe the case of a 60-year-old male patient with type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, complicated by progressive deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. He failed to improve when therapy was continued with a low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin) and high doses of intravenous immunoglobulins were administered. The test for heparin-dependent platelet aggregation was positive for unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin, but negative for the heparinoid Org 10172. During subsequent anticoagulant therapy with Org 10172 for seven days the number of platelets increased rapidly and the patient recovered. Nine months later Org 10172 was used again in this patient for thrombosis prophylaxis without any adverse effects. In patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requiring immediately acting anticoagulant therapy, Org 10172 can be considered as an effective alternative drug to unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins.