Arthroscopic partial resection of the scapula for snapping scapula: a new technique

Minimum 5-Year Clinical and Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Arthroscopic Scapulothoracic Bursectomy and Partial Scapulectomy for Snapping Scapula Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is a rare condition that is oftentimes debilitating. For patients whose symptoms are resistant to nonoperative treatment, arthroscopic surgery may offer relief. Because of the rarity of SSS, reports of clinical outcomes after arthroscopic SSS surgery are primarily limited to small case series and short-term follow-up studies.

PURPOSE

To report minimum 5-year clinical and sport-specific outcomes after arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS and to identify demographic and clinical factors at baseline associated with clinical outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS between October 2005 and February 2016 with a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this single-center study. Clinical outcome scores, including the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, were collected at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Additionally, it was determined which patients reached the minimal clinically important difference. Bivariate analysis was used to determine whether baseline demographic and clinical factors had any association with the outcome scores.

RESULTS

Of 81 patients eligible for inclusion in the study, follow-up was obtained for 66 patients (age 33.6 ± 13.3 years; 31 female). At a mean follow-up of 8.9 ± 2.5 years (range, 5.0-15.4 years), all of the outcome scores significantly improved compared with baseline. These included the ASES (from 56.7 ± 14.5 at baseline to 87.2 ± 13.9 at follow-up; P < .001), QuickDASH (from 38.7 ± 17.6 to 13.1 ± 14.6; P < .001), SANE (from 52.4 ± 21.2 to 82.7 ± 19.9; P < .001), SF-12 Physical Component Summary (from 39.7 ± 8.3 to 50.3 ± 8.2; P < .001), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (from 48.2 ± 11.7 to 52.0 ± 9.0; P = 0.014) and VAS pain (from 5.2 ± 2.1 to 1.4 ± 2.0; P < .001). The minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score was reached by 77.6% of the patients. Median postoperative satisfaction was 8 out of 10. It was found that 90.5% of the patients returned to sport, with 73.8% of the patients able to return to their preinjury level. At the time of final follow-up, 8 (12.1%) patients had undergone revision surgery for recurrent SSS symptoms. Older age at surgery (P = .044), lower preoperative SF-12 Mental Component Summary score (P = .008), lower preoperative ASES score (P = .019), and increased preoperative VAS pain score (P = .016) were significantly associated with not achieving a Patient Acceptable Symptom State on the ASES score.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS experienced clinically significant improvements in functional scores, pain, and quality of life, which were sustained at a minimum of 5 years and a mean follow-up of 8.9 years postoperatively. Higher patient age, inferior mental health status, increased shoulder pain, and lower ASES scores at baseline were significantly associated with worse postoperative outcomes.

Preoperative patient factors that predict achieving the minimal clinically important difference following arthroscopic treatment of snapping scapula syndrome

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after arthroscopic treatment of snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) using a distribution-based method, and to identify demographic, clinical, and intraoperative factors significantly associated with the achievement of MCID. It was hypothesized that subjective satisfaction scores after the procedure would be strongly associated with the achievement of MCID thresholds for the PROs and that pain, preoperative response to injection, and a scapulectomy in addition to bursal resection would be predictive of clinically relevant improvement.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of SSS between October 2005 and September 2020 with a minimum of 2-year short-term postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study. The MCID was calculated using a distribution-based approach for the following PROs: 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain "today" and "at worst." The association between achievement of the MCID and postoperative subjective satisfaction was investigated, and factors associated with achievement of MCID were determined using bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of a total of 190 patients assessed for eligibility, 77 patients (38.1 ± 14.3 years; 36 females) were included. Within the study population, statistically significant improvements in postoperative SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) (P < .001) and mental component summary (MCS) (P < 0.034), ASES (P < .001), QuickDASH (P < .001), SANE (P < .001), and VAS pain (P < .001) scores were observed at the minimum 2-year follow-up. The calculated MCID threshold values based on the study population were 5.0 for SF-12 PCS, 5.8 for SF-12 MCS, 11.3 for ASES, -10.5 for QuickDASH, 14.7 for SANE, 1.5 for VAS pain, and 1.7 for VAS pain at worst. Reaching the MCID was strongly associated with postoperative satisfaction (rated on a scale of 1-10). Across the PROs, younger age, favorable preoperative response to injection, partial scapuloplasty or scapulectomy, no prior surgery, and pain and function at baseline were significantly associated with attaining MCID.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for SSS experienced clinically significant improvements in functional scores, pain, and quality of life. This study demonstrated predictive roles for certain patient-specific factors and diagnostic variables for achieving MCID in PROs, which may help surgeons preoperatively assess the probability of success and manage patient expectations.

Surgery for internal rotation contracture in infancy may obviate the need for brachial plexus nerve reconstruction: early experience

BACKGROUND

Shoulder internal rotation contracture and subluxation in the first year of life has long been recognized in some patients with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). Surgical management of shoulder pathology has traditionally been undertaken following nerve reconstruction as necessary. In some patients; however, shoulder pathology may impair or obscure functional neuromuscular recovery of the upper extremity. As a proof of concept, we report a highly selected subset of patients with BPBI in whom shoulder surgery undertaken before one year of age obviated the need for neuroma resection and nerve grafting.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients with upper trunk BPBI who underwent shoulder surgery before one year of age from 2015 to 2018. Upper extremity motor function was evaluated with preoperative and postoperative Active Movement Scale scores, Cookie tests, and the requirement for subsequent neuroma resection and nerve grafting.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with BPBI meeting the inclusion criteria underwent shoulder surgery (including a subscapularis slide and tendon transfers of the teres major and latissimus dorsi muscles) before 1 year of age. Preoperatively, no patients of the appropriate age passed the Cookie test for elbow flexion. Thirteen patients either passed the Cookie test or scored Active Movement Scale score 7 for elbow flexion at or before the last available follow-up undertaken at a median age of 3.4 [1.4, 5.2] years. One of those 13 patients underwent single fascicular distal nerve transfer to improve elbow flexion before subsequently passing the Cookie test. Two patients did not have sufficient follow-up to assess elbow flexion.

CONCLUSION

Although the exact role of shoulder surgery in infancy for BPBI remains to be defined, the findings from this study provide proof of concept that early, targeted surgical treatment of the shoulder may obviate the need for brachial plexus nerve reconstruction in a highly selected group of infants with BPBI.

Arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy with and without superomedial angle scapuloplasty: a comparison of patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Operative treatment of scapulothoracic bursitis most commonly comprises arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy with or without partial superomedial angle scapuloplasty. There is currently no consensus regarding whether or when scapuloplasty should be performed. Prior studies are limited to small case series, and optimal surgical indications are not yet established. The purposes of this study were (1) to retrospectively review patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of scapulothoracic bursitis and (2) to compare outcomes between scapulothoracic bursectomy alone and bursectomy with scapuloplasty. We hypothesized that bursectomy with scapuloplasty would provide superior pain relief and functional improvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All cases of scapulothoracic débridement with or without scapuloplasty completed at a single academic center from 2007 through August 2020 were reviewed. Patient demographic characteristics, symptomatology data, physical examination findings, and corticosteroid injection response data were collected from the electronic medical record. Visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores were collected. Comparisons between the group undergoing bursectomy alone and the group undergoing bursectomy with scapuloplasty were made using the Student t test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent scapulothoracic bursectomy alone, and 38 patients underwent bursectomy with scapuloplasty. Final follow-up data were available for 56 of 68 cases (82%). Final postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (3.4 ± 2.2 and 2.8 ± 2.2, respectively; P = .351), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (75.8 ± 17.7 and 76.5 ± 22.5, respectively; P = .895), and Simple Shoulder Test scores (8.8 ± 2.3 and 9.5 ± 2.8, respectively; P = .340) were similar between the bursectomy-alone and bursectomy-with-scapuloplasty groups.

CONCLUSION

Both arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy alone and bursectomy with scapuloplasty are effective treatments for scapulothoracic bursitis. Operative time is shorter without scapuloplasty. In this retrospective series, these procedures showed similar outcomes regarding shoulder function, pain, surgical complications, and rates of subsequent shoulder surgery. Further studies with a focus on 3-dimensional scapular morphology may help optimize patient selection for each of these procedures.

Anatomic safe zones for arthroscopic snapping scapula surgery: quantitative anatomy of the superomedial scapula and associated neurovascular structures and the effects of arm positioning on safety

BACKGROUND

Neurovascular anatomy has not been previously quantified for the arthroscopic snapping scapula approach with the patient in the most frequent patient position ("chicken-wing" position). The purposes of this study were (1) to determine anatomic relationships of the superomedial scapula and neurovascular structures at risk during arthroscopic surgical treatment of snapping scapula syndrome (SSS), (2) to compare these measurements between the arm in the neutral position and the arm in the chicken-wing position, and (3) to establish safe zones for arthroscopic treatment of SSS.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric hemi-torsos (mean age, 55.8 years; range, 52-66 years) were dissected to ascertain relevant anatomic structure locations including the (1) spinal accessory nerve, (2) dorsal scapular nerve, and (3) suprascapular nerve. A coordinate measuring device was used to collect data on the relationships of anatomic landmarks and at-risk structures during the surgical approach.

RESULTS

The dorsal scapular nerve was a mean of 24.4 mm medial to the superomedial scapula in the neutral position and 33.1 mm medial in the chicken-wing position (P < .001); the dorsal scapular nerve was 21.7 mm medial to the medial border of the scapular spine in the neutral position and 35.5 mm medial in the chicken-wing position (P < .001). The mean distance from the superomedial angle to the spinal accessory nerve intersection at the superior scapular border was 16.5 mm in the neutral position and 15.0 mm in the chicken-wing position (P = .031). The average distance from the superomedial angle to the closest point of the spinal accessory nerve was 11.6 mm and 10.4 mm in the neutral position and chicken-wing position, respectively (P = .039).

CONCLUSION

Neurologic structures around the scapula vary significantly between the neutral arm position and the chicken-wing position commonly used in the arthroscopic treatment of SSS. The chicken-wing position improves safe distances for the dorsal scapular nerve during medial-portal placement and should be considered as a primary position for arthroscopic management of SSS.

Novel technique for scapulothoracic arthroscopy: A case report of the application of intraoperative 3D imaging

Introduction

Snapping shoulder syndrome could be effectively treated with scapulothoracic arthroscopy. The excision of the scapular superomedial corner is assumed to help lower the recurrence rate. However, the amount of resection is still controversial. Furthermore, we lack a technique to measure if the resected amount was adequate based only on arthroscopy evaluation.

Case study presentation

We describe a 47-year-old man who suffered from severe snapping shoulder syndrome as a consequence of a deformity of the left superomedial scapular corner. The patient had endoscopic bursectomy and superomedial corner resection. Intraoperative three-dimensional CT scans (3D-CT) were used to evaluate the amount of resection. The patient recovered without incident and resumed his usual activities within 30 days following surgery. At the six-month follow-up, there were no recurrent symptoms.

Conclusion

Intraoperative 3D imaging significantly enhances the safety and efficacy of scapulothoracic arthroscopy. This is a novel technique that, to our knowledge, has not been reported previously in the literature.

•

The scapular superomedial corner excision may help reduce recurrence rates of treatment for snapping shoulder syndrome.

•

The lack of anatomical landmarks makes estimating the resected volume by arthroscopic vision challenging.

•

This is the first report of the application of intra-operative 3D imaging for scapulothoracic arthroscopy.

•

Intraoperative 3D imaging significantly enhances the safety and effectiveness of scapulothoracic arthroscopy.

•

Intraoperative 3D imaging help in the precise identification of anatomical landmarks in small or complex regions.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Snapping Scapula Syndrome: A Scoping Review

CONTEXT

Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is commonly misdiagnosed and underreported due to lack of awareness.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence related to SSS diagnosis and treatment to aid clinicians in managing the condition more effectively.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched for studies related to the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of SSS (database inception to March 2020).

STUDY SELECTION

Databases were searched for available studies related to the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of SSS.

STUDY DESIGN

A scoping review study design was selected to explore the breadth of knowledge in the literature regarding SSS diagnosis and treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

DATA EXTRACTION

Primary outcomes abstraction included accuracy of diagnostic tests, functional outcomes, and pain relief associated with various nonoperative and operative treatment options for SSS.

RESULTS

A total of 1442 references were screened and 40 met the inclusion criteria. Studies commonly reported SSS as a clinical diagnosis and relied heavily on a focused history and physical examination. The most common signs reported were medial scapular border tenderness, crepitus, and audible snapping. Three-dimensional computed tomography had high interrater reliability of 0.972, with a 100% success rate in identifying symptomatic incongruity of the scapular articular surface. Initial nonoperative treatment was reported as successful in most symptomatic patients, with improved visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (7.7 ± 0.5 pretreatment, to 2.4 ± 0.6). Persistently symptomatic patients underwent surgical intervention most commonly involving bursectomy, superomedial angle resection, or partial scapulectomy. High satisfaction rates of surgery were reported in VAS (6.9 ± 0.7 to 1.9 ± 0.9), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (50.3 ± 12.2 to 80.6 ± 14.9), and mean simple shoulder test scores (5.6 ± 1.0 to 10.2 ± 1.1).

CONCLUSION

Focused history and physical examination is the most crucial initial step in the diagnostic process, with supplemental imaging used to assess for structural etiologies when nonoperative management fails. Nonoperative management is as effective as surgical management in pain relief and is advised for 3 to 6 months before operative treatment.

Prognosis After Arthroscopic Superior Medial Scapuloplasty for Snapping Scapula Syndrome Improves After a Transient Beneficial Response With an Ultrasound-Guided Subscapular Cortisone Injection

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic value of an ultrasound-guided subscapular local anesthetic and cortisone injection in a consecutive series of patients who underwent an arthroscopic superior medial scapuloplasty for snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) and had been refractory to conservative treatment.

METHODS

We undertook an arthroscopic superior medial scapuloplasty on patients with a clinical diagnosis of SSS who had failed a structured physiotherapy program and had either gained a good response or no to minimal response to preoperative ultrasound-guided subscapular local anesthetic and cortisone injection. The patients were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up with the QuickDASH and Constant scores, and their pain was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Between January 2009 and December 2016, 47 patients were included in the study, with a minimal follow-up of 2 years. There were 29 female and 18 male patients, and the mean age at the time of surgery was 27.4 years (range 15 to 61). Forty-two patients were available at final follow-up. There were 31 patients in the good response group and 11 patients in the no to minimal response group. For all patients, the mean time to follow-up was 41.8 months (range 24 to 108). There was a significant improvement after surgery in the mean QuickDASH score (from 39 to 20, P < .001) (minimal clinically important difference [MCID] 15.91) , Constant score (from 57 to 87, P < .001) (MCID 10.4), and VAS (from 6 to 2, P < .001) (MCID 3). For the good response group, there was a significant improvement after surgery in the mean QuickDASH score (from 38 to 18, P < .001) (MCID 15.91), the Constant score (from 57 to 89) (MCID 10.4), and the VAS (from 6 to 2, P < .001) (MCID 3). For the no to minimal response group, there was a significant improvement after surgery in the mean QuickDASH score (from 42 to 24, P < .01) (MCID 15.91), the Constant score (from 58 to 80, P < .002) (MCID 10.4), and the VAS (from 6 to 2, P < .01) (MCID 3). The difference in postoperative improvement of the QuickDASH and Constant scores between the good response and the no to minimal response groups was statistically significant (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that arthroscopic scapuloplasty can lead to a significant improvement in pain and function in all patients with a clinical diagnosis of snapping scapula syndrome refractory to conservative treatment. Patients who gained a good transient response to a preoperative ultrasound-guided subscapular cortisone injection obtained a significantly better recovery than those who did not. A preoperative ultrasound-guided subscapular cortisone injection appeared to be of prognostic value.

Superomedial Portal (Ejnisman's Portal) and Modified "Chicken-Wing" Patient Position for Scapulothoracic Arthroscopy

Scapulothoracic arthroscopy is performed to treat scapulothoracic joint disorders, such as scapulothoracic bursitis, snapping scapula, and osteochondroma of the anterior scapula surface, and in the extraction of firearm projectiles. This article describes this treatment using an alternative superomedial portal and modified chicken-wing position to improve access to the scapulothoracic space and thus perform the procedure as safely as possible, with less morbidity and excellent results for the patients.

Snapping scapula syndrome: arthroscopic surgical treatment

Objectives

To evaluate the results of patients undergoing arthroscopic surgical treatment for snapping scapula syndrome.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 11 patients undergoing scapulothoracic arthroscopy for the treatment of snapping scapula syndrome. The study included patients with clinical diagnosis of snapping scapula syndrome who did not show pain improvement after at least six months of physical therapy. Patients were assessed using the DASH, UCLA, visual analogue pain assessment (VAS), and Short-Form 36 (SF36) scores.

Results

The mean age at surgery was 38.4 years (21–48). The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 2.8 years (range 6 months to 6 years). The mean follow-up duration was 12 months (range: 6.4–28). The mean postoperative scores were: DASH, 7.8 points; VAS, 1.5 points, being ten cases (90%) of mild pain and one case (10%) of moderate pain; UCLA, 32; and SF-36, 79.47.

Conclusions

The arthroscopic approach for the treatment of snapping scapula syndrome presents excellent functional results.

Arthroscopic management of snapping scapula syndrome improves pain and functional outcomes, although a high rate of residual symptoms has been reported

PURPOSE

To investigate the use of arthroscopy in the management of patients with snapping scapula syndrome, including aetiology, surgical decision-making, outcomes, complications, effectiveness of arthroscopy, and quality of evidence of the existing literature.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, Ovid [MEDLINE], and EMBASE) were searched independently and in duplicate to systematically screen the literature. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist guided the reporting and data abstraction. Methodological quality of all included papers was assessed using the MINORS criteria. The results are presented in a narrative summary fashion using descriptive statistics including means, proportions, and ranges.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 studies (5 case reports and 13 case series; all level IV evidence) were identified, including 201 patients (203 shoulders). The mean follow-up period was 32.7 months (range 1-154 months). Surgical decision-making for the use of arthroscopy was most commonly based on a failed trial of initial non-operative management in 17 studies (94%). Overall, 21% of cases achieved complete resolution of pre-operative symptoms, including pain, crepitus, and range of motion, while 68% of cases obtained some clinical improvement, but reported some residual symptoms (persistent crepitus [12%] and persistent scapulothoracic pain [4%]). Moreover, poor outcomes were reported 11% of cases and the most common complication was scapular oedema (6%).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic management of snapping scapula syndrome yields improvement in pain, crepitus, and range of motion in a majority of patients; however, most patients experience residual symptoms. Further studies are needed to compare the outcomes of shoulder arthroscopy with other available treatment options for snapping scapula syndrome. Shoulder arthroscopy for snapping scapula can improve patients' symptoms; however, patients must be informed about the high likelihood of persistent symptoms post-operatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of Level IV studies.

Outcome of Scapulothoracic Arthroscopy for Painful Snapping Scapula

Introduction:

Patients with scapulothoracic syndrome present with pain in the scapulothoracic area aggravated by overhead and repetitive shoulder movements. The aim of our study was to assess the outcome of scapulothoracic arthroscopic treatment in patients with painful snapping scapula in our institution.

Methods:

Fourteen patients underwent scapulothoracic arthroscopic treatment for painful snapping scapula. Pre-operatively, all these patients had a trial of conservative treatment modalities for at least 6 months.

Two portals along the medial border of scapula were used for arthroscopy and instrumentation. In three cases a superior portal was also used. The arm was placed in the “chicken wing” position so that the scapula lifted up from the chest wall. Outcome was assessed using pre and postoperative pain visual analogue score and Oxford Shoulder Score.

Results:

Of the fourteen patients included in our study, ten were female and four were male patients. Mean age at the time of surgery was 27.6 years. Mean follow up was 35.7 months. Pain visual analogue score improved significantly from a mean of 8.8 preoperatively to 2.5 postoperatively (P value 0.00002). There was also a significant improvement in Oxford Shoulder Score from a mean of 10.8 to 40.9 (P= 0.00001). Mean crepitus score significantly decreased from 2.6 to 0.21 (p < 0.00001). Crepitus completely resolved in eleven patients. In three there was residual palpable crepitus but they had good pain relief.

Conclusion:

Arthroscopic scapulothoracic treatment provides significant pain relief and functional improvement for painful snapping scapula symptoms not responding to non-surgical treatment modalities.

A Cadaveric Model Evaluating the Influence of Bony Anatomy and the Effectiveness of Partial Scapulectomy on Decompression of the Scapulothoracic Space in Snapping Scapula Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is caused by bony and/or soft tissue impingement in the scapulothoracic articulation. Surgical resection of the superomedial angle (SMA) plus bursectomy can provide relief in most cases; however, the amount needed to achieve adequate scapulothoracic space decompression (SSD) is unknown.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of partial scapulectomy and the influence of bony anatomy on SSD. It was hypothesized that the anterior offset and costomedial angle would correlate with the amount of bony resection needed to achieve adequate SSD.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty pairs (n = 40) of shoulder specimens (mean age, 58 years [range, 41-64 years]; 10 male and 10 female specimens) were included. The scapula shape, medial scapula corpus angle (MSCA), anterior offset, and costomedial angle were obtained from computed tomography scans. Specimens were dissected, and each bare bony scapula was rigidly mounted. Points were collected using a 3-dimensional measuring arm. An SMA point and theoretical resection points (incremental 1-cm points up to 3 cm) proceeding laterally and medially were collected. The scapular plane was interpolated using points from the posterior scapular body. The horizontal distances of the anterior offset and each resection point to the scapular plane were calculated. The difference between the native anterior offset and the offset after resection represented the SSD. Adequate SSD was set at 5 mm. One-way analyses of variance and Pearson correlations were used with statistical significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The maximum SSD with 3-cm resection was significantly correlated with the anterior offset ( R = 0.83, P < .001) as well as the costomedial angle ( R = -0.43, P = .006) but not the MSCA ( R = -0.11, P = .495) or scapula shape ( F_2,37 = 0.39, P = .681). For the 5 scapulae with an anterior offset of less than 20 mm, a 5-mm SSD was not achieved. For 18 of 30 (60%) scapulae with an anterior offset between 20 mm and 35 mm, 3-cm resection provided at least a 5-mm SSD. For the 5 scapulae with an anterior offset of greater than 35 mm, 2-cm resection resulted in at least a 5-mm SSD in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The anterior offset of the scapula appeared to be the most important bony parameter to consider during preoperative planning and the evaluation of SSD with partial scapulectomy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this study may help surgeons with preoperative planning of surgical decompression of the scapulothoracic space for patients with symptomatic SSS.

Snapping scapula. Arthroscopic resection of osteochondroma of the subscapularis superomedial angle. Case report and literature review

Snapping scapula syndrome has several etiologies, including subscapular osteochondroma. When this tumor needs to be removed, this can be done arthroscopically, a procedure that has restricted indications. The authors present a case of a patient with superomedial subscapular osteochondroma who underwent a scapulothoracic arthroscopy for its removal.

Treatment of Snapping Scapula Syndrome in Children and Adolescents

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review 2 separate cohorts of young patients treated for snapping scapula: those treated surgically and those managed nonoperatively.

METHODS

A retrospective IRB-approved review was conducted on 18 pediatric aged patients (19 shoulders): 12 patients (average age 13.3) were treated nonoperatively, 6 patients (average age 15.4) (7 shoulders) were treated operatively. Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records and 2 questionnaires for level of activity, return to sport, subjective satisfaction from treatment, and preoperative/postoperative levels of pain. The American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score was measured for both groups.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up for nonoperative patients was 43.7 months (range, 20 to 116 mo). Pretreatment subjective pain levels were 5.2 (scale 1 to 10), posttreatment were 1.5. There was a 75% return to play rate, and an overall 75% satisfaction rate. Posttreatment ASES scores were 90.0. Mean follow-up for surgical patients was 129.5 months (range, 68 to 177 mo). Pretreatment subjective pain level was 8.6, posttreatment was 0.75. There was an 83% return to play rate, and an overall 100% satisfaction rate. There were no complications. Posttreatment ASES scores were 92.6.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes for nonoperative treatment of snapping scapula are good for young patients. Surgical management of snapping scapula is a safe and viable treatment option for patients who fail nonoperative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Snapping Scapula Syndrome: Outcomes at Minimum of 2 Years

PURPOSE

To investigate clinical outcomes after primary and revision arthroscopic treatment for snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) and identify predictive factors associated with outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for SSS between October 2005 and December 2013 were identified in a prospectively collected database. The inclusion criteria were patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic SSS, in whom extensive nonoperative modalities failed, who underwent arthroscopic surgery for SSS, and who had undergone surgery a minimum of 2 years earlier. Postoperative clinical outcomes were assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; and general health Short Form 12 (SF-12) scores, including both physical component summary and mental component summary. Patient satisfaction was recorded on a 10-point visual analog scale. Scapular bony morphology was determined on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Ninety-two scapulae underwent arthroscopic treatment for SSS. There were 74 scapulae that met the inclusion criteria, including having undergone surgery a minimum of 2 years earlier. An outcome questionnaire was completed for 60 of 74 (81%). The mean age was 33 years (range, 12-65 years), and the mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 4 years (range, 90 days to 20.4 years). The mean follow-up period was 3.4 years (range, 2-7 years). Eight scapulae failed initial surgical management (10.9%) because of recurrent pain and underwent revision surgery at a mean of 309 days (range, 120-917 days). After surgery, there was a significant improvement in all outcome scores, including SF-12 physical component summary score, from 39.2 to 45.4 (P = .002); SF-12 mental component summary score, from 45.0 to 49.6 (P = .023); American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, from 52.6 to 75.8 (P < .001); and score on the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, from 40.2 to 24.2 (P = .001). The median patient satisfaction rating was 7 of 10. Greater age, lower preoperative psychological score, and longer duration of symptoms before surgery correlated with lower postoperative outcome scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic surgery is an effective treatment for SSS in both primary and revision cases, showing significant improvements in all postoperative outcome scores at a mean of 3.4 years. Lower preoperative mental status score, longer duration of symptoms, and greater age were associated with poorer outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Open Surgical Treatment for Snapping Scapula Provides Durable Pain Relief, but so Does Nonsurgical Treatment

BACKGROUND

Resection of the medial upper corner of the scapula is one option for treating patients with a painful chronic snapping scapula. However, the degree to which this procedure results in sustained relief of pain during long-term followup, and whether surgical treatment offers any compelling advantages over nonsurgical approaches at long-term followup, are not known.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) At long-term followup after surgical treatment of a painful snapping scapula, did patients' pain decrease? (2) Did scapulocostal crepitation improve? (3) Did patients return to work?

METHODS

Between 1971 and 1992, 15 patients underwent surgery by one surgeon for persistent (> 1 year) and severely painful crepitus around the superomedial scapula that did not respond to nonsurgical approaches. The procedure consisted of an open resection of the superomedial corner of the scapula and release of the levator scapulae muscle. Patients treated surgically were compared with a group of nine patients treated nonsurgically between 1975 and 1997; their treatments included temporary physiotherapy, massage, and NSAIDs. In general, the patients treated nonsurgically presented with less pain. However, during much of this study period, objective pain and functional scales were not in common use, and so baseline scores were not available. Of the 15 patients treated surgically, nine participated in a clinical and questionnaire survey at a mean of 22 years (range, 16-35 years), and 12 participated in a questionnaire survey a mean 27 years after surgery (range, 23-43 years). Of the nine patients treated nonsurgically, seven participated in a clinical followup and questionnaire survey at a mean followup of 16 years (range, 10-25 years), and all nine completed a questionnaire survey at a mean of 22 years (range, 17-33 years). Patient age at onset of symptoms was a mean of 27 years. The clinical followup and questionnaires focused on pain, crepitation, and work status.

RESULTS

With the numbers available, there was no difference in pain scores between patients treated surgically and those treated nonsurgically (mean VAS pain with exertion 0.8 ± 1.3 versus 1.5 ± 1.6; p = 0.357); in fact, pain scores were quite low in both groups. Pain improved promptly in seven of 12 patients treated surgically, but lasted for at least several years in all patients treated nonsurgically. Crepitus persisted variably in both groups at final followup, with no apparent difference between the groups in terms of its frequency, but it was not consistently associated with pain at final followup in either group (six of 12 patients treated surgically, all painless; and all of seven clinically examined patients treated nonsurgically, two without pain, had crepitus at latest followup; p = 0.004), whereas at initial presentation, the crepitus had been painful in all patients. All patients in both groups had returned to work after surgery or the first consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients who undergo this procedure appear to obtain sustained relief of painful crepitus at long term, but so do patients treated nonsurgically. Since the decision to treat these patients surgically was somewhat subjective, and since patients treated nonsurgically did so well (although the surgically treated patients improved faster), we cannot conclude that surgery is better than nonsurgical treatment. Multicenter comparative studies with carefully applied indications are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Arthroscopic Scapulothoracic Decompression for Snapping Scapula Syndrome

Snapping scapula syndrome at the superomedial corner of the scapula can lead to significant shoulder dysfunction. Bursectomy with or without partial scapulectomy is currently the most beneficial primary method of treatment in patients in whom nonoperative therapy fails. Arthroscopic access to the scapulothoracic space is simple and reproducible with the technique described in this report. The bursal tissue can be cleared, optimizing visualization of the scapulothoracic space and the anatomic structures. Arthroscopic decompression of the scapulothoracic bursa and resection of the superomedial corner of the scapula are highlighted in a video example.

Association between scapula bony morphology and snapping scapula syndrome

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND

Scapular incongruity has been described as a contributing factor to the development of snapping scapula syndrome (SSS). The purpose of this retrospective case-control study was to determine the association between scapula bony morphology on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the diagnosis of SSS.

METHODS

Bony morphologies of the scapula were evaluated on MRI scans of 26 patients with SSS and 19 patients with non-SSS pathologies. The medial scapula corpus angle (MSCA) was measured on axial MRI sequences. Scapulae were categorized as straight, S shaped, or concave. Two independent observers performed the measurements. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements of MSCA measurements were determined with intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Axial scapula bony morphology identified 28 scapulae of the straight type, 14 S-shaped scapulae, and 5 concave scapulae. All 5 concave scapulae had confirmed SSS. Measurement of the MSCA showed excellent interobserver agreement of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.89) and intraobserver agreement of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.82). There were significant differences in the mean MSCAs between shoulders with SSS (14.4° ± 19.3°) and non-SSS shoulders (-3.3° ± 15.3°, P = .001). The odds ratio was 8.4 (95% CI, 2.2 to 31.8) for positive MSCA and SSS. The scapulothoracic distance was significantly decreased in the SSS group (14.9 ± 5.8 mm) compared with the non-SSS patients (24.0 ± 6.7 mm, P < .001).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Anterior angulation of the medial scapula in the axial plane was associated with SSS. Patients with a concave-shaped scapula and a positive MSCA have a 12-fold increased risk of SSS. The MSCA may prove helpful in determining the location and amount of scapular resection needed for patients with SSS.

Four-dimensional computed tomography scans facilitate preoperative planning in snapping scapula syndrome

HYPOTHESIS

Because a 4-dimensional CT scan (4D CT) is able to provide a moving 3-dimensional (3D) image in real time in patients with snapping scapula syndrome, a 4D CT scan should be able to demonstrate bony impingement of the scapula on the posterior thorax. This study was performed to determine if 4D CT scans aid the clinician in defining the size and location of the scapular bone causing impingement in patients with snapping scapula syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 2009 and August 2013, 12 patients (median age, 26.5 years; range 15-55 years) with snapping scapula syndrome were investigated with 4D CT. The images formed produced a dynamic volume-rendered reconstruction of the scapulothoracic joint that displayed its movements and any dynamic area of impingement of the scapula on surrounding bony structures. Asymmetry between symptomatic and asymptomatic scapulae was used to determine the radiologic cause of the patient's symptoms. After the failure of conservative management, 8 patients underwent surgery for their condition.

RESULTS

Five patients demonstrated bony contact of the scapula on the posterior thoracic ribs. Four patients demonstrated no bony contact but close apposition of the scapula to the posterior thoracic ribs. Three patients demonstrated no bony impingement but abnormal movement of the second and third rib caused by a soft-tissue tethering structure.

CONCLUSION

The 4D CT scan images defined pathology well in patients with snapping scapula syndrome and improved assessment of the amount and location of the scapular bone and soft tissue causing symptoms.

Scapulothoracic bursitis and snapping scapula syndrome: a critical review of current evidence

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic scapulothoracic disorders, such as painful scapular crepitus and/or bursitis, are uncommon; however, they can produce significant pain and disability in many patients.

PURPOSE

To review the current knowledge pertaining to snapping scapula syndrome and to identify areas of further research that may be helpful to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We performed a preliminary search of the PubMed and Embase databases using the search terms "snapping scapula," "scapulothoracic bursitis," "partial scapulectomy," and "superomedial angle resection" in September 2013. All nonreview articles related to the topic of snapping scapula syndrome were included.

RESULTS

The search identified a total of 167 unique articles, 81 of which were relevant to the topic of snapping scapula syndrome. There were 36 case series of fewer than 10 patients, 16 technique papers, 11 imaging studies, 9 anatomic studies, and 9 level IV outcomes studies. The level of evidence obtained from this literature search was inadequate to perform a formal systematic review or meta-analysis. Therefore, a critical review of current evidence is presented.

CONCLUSION

Snapping scapula syndrome, a likely underdiagnosed condition, can produce significant shoulder dysfunction in many patients. Because the precise origin is typically unknown, specific treatments that are effective for some patients may not be effective for others. Nevertheless, bursectomy with or without partial scapulectomy is currently the most effective primary method of treatment in patients who fail nonoperative therapy. However, many patients experience continued shoulder disability even after surgical intervention. Future studies should focus on identifying the modifiable factors associated with poor outcomes after operative and nonoperative management for snapping scapula syndrome in an effort to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Image-guided scapulothoracic arthroscopy for removing firearm projectiles

Scapulothoracic arthroscopy is gaining recognition among arthroscopic procedures as it is considered a relatively low morbidity procedure; also, continuing studies of this technique are making it safer. Scapulothoracic arthroscopy can be used for removal of a foreign body. This case report describes the removal of a firearm projectile using image-guided arthroscopy, highlighting the anatomical aspects and characteristics of the surgical technique. In this case, the patient recovered uneventfully, with complete remission of symptoms in 30 days, returning to his usual activities within 2 months after surgery.

Scapulothoracic arthroscopy for symptomatic snapping scapula: a prospective cohort study with two-year mean follow-up

BACKGROUND

Snapping scapula is characterized by crepitus between the scapula and the chest wall due to abnormal tissue at this site. Surgical treatment, when needed, may be either open or arthroscopic. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic decompression in ten subjects with symptomatic snapping scapula.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten subjects, five men and five women, mean age 24 years, were treated by arthroscopy after unsuccessful conservative management for 6 months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index, Constant-Murley score (CS), and simple shoulder test (SST). Follow-up was at 3 and 6 months; the final evaluation was conducted at a mean interval of 24 months. The final and preoperative X-rays were compared.

RESULTS

The WORC index increased significantly at 3 (p < 0.05), 6 (p < 0.01), and 24 months (p < 0.01). Similar outcomes were found for the CS at all 3 follow-up points (3 months, p < 0.05; 6 months, p < 0.01; 24 months, p < 0.01). Mean "yes" responses on the SST were 9.8 ± 1.4 at 3 months (p < 0.05), 10.2 ± 1.2 at 6 months (p < 0.01), and 10.6 ± 1.2 at 24 months (p < 0.01). X-ray examination depicted flattening of the anterior surface of the superior-medial angle of the scapula in the five patients who had had bone resection, whereas no significant difference with preoperative imaging was detected in the five patients who were managed by bursectomy and debridement alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopy is a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for painful snapping scapula syndrome. Comparative clinical trials are needed to collect conclusive data to state that it is the most suitable treatment for this condition.

Scapulothoracic anatomy and snapping scapula syndrome

The scapulothoracic articulation is a sliding junction between the deep aspect of the scapula and thoracic rib cage at the levels of ribs 2 through 7. Motion at this articulation is dynamically stabilized by a variety of muscular attachments, allowing for controlled positioning of the glenoid to assist in glenohumeral joint function. A thorough understanding of the complex anatomic relationships, including the various muscles, and bursa, is critical to the evaluation of patients presenting with scapulothoracic disorders. The snapping scapula syndrome is caused by either osseous lesions or scapulothoracic bursitis and can be difficult to recognize and treat. The purpose of this review is to discuss the anatomy of the scapulothoracic articulation with an emphasis on the pathology associated with snapping scapula syndrome.

Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Scapulothoracic Bursectomy and Partial Superomedial Angle Scapulectomy

Background:

Arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy with partial superomedial angle scapulectomy has been described as a treatment for persistent scapulothoracic bursitis with varying results.

Purpose:

To evaluate patients after arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy utilizing validated functional outcome instruments.

Study Design:

Case series.

Methods:

Fifteen patients underwent arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy and partial superomedial angle scapulectomy. Thirteen patients were available for review at a mean 27-month follow-up (range, 13-65 months). Patients were evaluated preoperatively with a history, physical examination evaluating medial scapula border tenderness and crepitus, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the simple shoulder test (SST). Postoperatively, patients were evaluated with all preoperative questionnaires as well as a satisfaction survey and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score.

Results:

SST scores improved significantly from a mean 7.7 ± 3.1 preoperatively to 10.3 ± 2.3 postoperatively (P = .03). VAS pain scores reduced significantly from 6.5 ± 2.2 preoperatively to 2.3 ± 2.4 postoperatively (P < .001). Ninety-two percent (12/13) of patients were satisfied, and 92% (12/13) stated they would have the surgical procedure performed again. The mean ASES postoperative score was 80.1 (range, 38-100). The 2 clinical failures (ASES scores <50) had either a workers’ compensation claim with persistent medial border tenderness or ongoing rotator cuff disease. Despite lower ASES scores, these patients were still satisfied with the procedure and would undergo it again.

Conclusion:

Arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy with partial superomedial angle scapulectomy provides significant improvements in pain and functional outcomes. Even in patients at risk for poorer clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and willingness to undergo the surgical procedure again was still high.

Snapping scapula syndrome: current concepts review in conservative and surgical treatment

The snapping scapula, also called "washboard syndrome" is a controversial condition attributed to bony and soft tissue abnormalities. The syndrome was understimated for long time and often associated only with specific osseous abnormalities. The nodal point in the overview of the syndrome is that crepitus associated with symptomatic bursitis may be physiologic and is not uncommon a clinical presentation without any form of crepitus or craquement. In the current rewiew we analyzed the current concepts in the conservative and surgical management of snapping scapula syndrome, preceded by a description of scapular anatomy, pathophysiology of scapulothoracic articulation and clinical features of snapping scapula.

Technique and outcomes of arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy in patients with snapping scapula syndrome with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.

METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, 23 shoulders in 21 consecutive patients were identified that had undergone arthroscopic treatment of snapping scapula syndrome. Each patient described mechanical symptoms with failure of nonsurgical modalities and reported symptomatic relief from a local anesthetic injection before surgical intervention. Preoperative and postoperative pain and functioning levels were assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), QuickDASH (shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) shoulder scores, and patient satisfaction was recorded on a 10-point visual analog scale. Univariate and paired t tests were used for data analysis. Significance was established at P ≤ .05.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of surgery was 33 years (SD, 14 years). A scapulothoracic bursectomy alone was performed in 2 shoulders, and the remaining 21 shoulders underwent both bursectomy and scapuloplasty of the superomedial or inferomedial scapular border. At a mean follow-up of 2.5 years (SD, 0.57 years), a significant improvement in the median ASES score was noted, from 53 points (range, 17 to 83 points) preoperatively to 73 points (range, 32 to 100 points) postoperatively (P = .001). The mean SANE and QuickDASH scores at follow-up were 73 (SD, 27) and 35 (SD, 30), respectively. Overall, median patient satisfaction with surgical outcome was 6 of 10 (range, 1 to 10). Of the shoulders, 3 (13%) underwent revision for persistent scapulothoracic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Snapping scapula syndrome can be a debilitating disorder. Although significant pain and functional improvement can be expected after arthroscopic bursectomy and scapuloplasty, the average postoperative ASES and SANE scores remain lower than expected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

The snapping scapula: diagnosis and treatment

As a largely under-recognized problem, snapping scapula stems from the disruption of normal mechanics in scapulothoracic articulation. It is especially common in the young, active patient population, and symptoms are frequently seen with overhead and throwing motions. Understanding the anatomy of the scapula and surrounding neurovascular structures is crucial in making a differential diagnosis and providing both nonoperative and surgical treatments. Common causes of snapping scapula include bursitis, muscle abnormality, and bony or soft-tissue abnormalities. Anatomic variations, such as excessive forward curvature of the superomedial border of the scapula, may also be a cause for snapping. Benign tumor conditions of the scapula can also predispose one to snapping scapula syndrome and should be thoroughly investigated during the course of treatment. Patients with snapping scapula syndrome typically present with a history of pain with overhead activities. Snapping scapula is associated with audible and palpable crepitus near the superomedial border of the scapula. Various imaging studies may be used to rule out soft-tissue and bony masses, which may cause impingement at the scapulothoracic articulation. In most cases nonoperative treatment is curative and includes physical therapy for scapular muscle strengthening and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications. Corticosteroid injections may also be used for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. In most cases overuse injuries and repetitive strains respond well to nonoperative treatments. When nonoperative measures fail, surgery is a proven modality, especially if a soft-tissue or bony mass is implicated. Both open and arthroscopic techniques have been described with predictable results.

Snapping scapula syndrome

Snapping scapula syndrome arises from either a soft-tissue or a skeletal anomaly within the scapulothoracic space that creates a cracking sound during scapulothoracic motion that patients associate with pain. Nonoperative measures consisting of supervised physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and therapeutic injections are the mainstay of treatment. Open, arthroscopic, and combined operative approaches have been described for the treatment of refractory cases, with good overall outcomes in many relatively small case series. However, the optimal operative approach has yet to be determined.

ARTHROSCOPY OF THE SCAPULOTHORACIC JOINT: CASE REPORTS

Scapulothoracic arthroscopy is a procedure presenting restricted indications, for resecting free bodies, benign tumors, bursitis, and snaping scapula. The authors report four cases of scapulothoracic joint arthroscopy; in the first case, only a benign tumor (osteochondroma) could be visualized; in the second case, arthroscopic resection of an osteochondroma was found; in the third case, arthroscopic bursectomy due to scapulothoracic bursitis, and; in the fourth case, bursectomy and partial superomedial arthroscopic scapulectomy due to snaping scapula.

Endoscopically assisted resection of a scapular osteochondroma causing snapping scapula syndrome

Background

Osteochondroma is the most common benign bone tumor in the scapula. This condition might lead to snapping scapula syndrome, which is characterized by painful, audible, and/or palpable abnormal scapulothoracic motion. In the present case, this syndrome was successfully treated by use of endoscopically assisted resection of the osteochondroma.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old man had a tolerable pain in his scapular region over a 10 years' period. The pain developed gradually with shoulder motion, in particular with golf swing since he was aiming a professional golf player career. On physical examination, "clunking" was noted once from 90 degrees of abduction to 180 degrees of shoulder motion. A trans-scapular roentgenogram and computed tomography images revealed an osteochondroma located at the anterior and inferior aspect of the scapula. Removal of the tumor was performed by the use of endoscopically assisted resection. One portal was made at the lateral border of the scapula to introduce a 2.7-mm-diameter, 30 degrees Hopkins telescope. The tumor was resected in a piece-by-piece manner by the use of graspers through the same portal. Immediately after the operation pain relief was obtained, and the "clunking" disappeared. CT images showed complete tumor resection. The patient could start playing golf one week after the surgery.

Conclusion

Endoscopically assisted resection of osteochondroma of the scapula provides a feasible technique to treat snapping scapula syndrome and obtain early functional recovery with a short hospital stay and cosmetic advantage.

[Endoscopic treatment of snapping scapula.]

We describe an endoscopic method for resection of the superomedial corner of the scapula in cases of painful snapping scapula. A preoperative computed tomography may be useful to show narrowing between the superomedial corner and the chest wall. Endoscopic technique gives the same goods results than open surgery with in cosmetic advantage and early rehabilitation. Avoided neurological lesion need to perform a precise portal placement.

Arthroscopic management of the painful snapping scapula

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the arthroscopic management of the snapping scapula syndrome.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case series.

METHODS

Thirteen patients underwent surgery for painful scapular snapping that had not responded to adequate conservative treatment. They had no evidence of anatomic abnormalities on plain radiographs. All patients underwent bursectomy and resection of bands of fibrous tissue at the superomedial angle. Bone was resected from the superomedial angle only if it appeared to be prominent during arthroscopy. This occurred in 3 cases. The patients' outcomes were assessed subjectively by their ability to return to work and their return to leisure, as well as the Constant score.

RESULTS

At the time of follow-up, 9 patients (69%) reported an improvement in their symptoms. Their median Constant score was 87 (range, 95 to 58). Four patients felt that their symptoms were unchanged or worse. Their median Constant score was 55 (range, 66 to 32). Of 9 employed patients, 8 returned to their previous careers. This group included 2 patients with physically demanding jobs. Of 9 patients who played sports regularly, 6 returned to their presymptomatic level of sporting activity. There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Subscapular bursectomy is a safe procedure with a low rate of morbidity. In the absence of a definable anatomic abnormality, arthroscopic bursectomy for the painful snapping scapula can result in satisfactory outcomes in approximately 70% of patients. More clearly defined indications for and contraindications against surgery are required to avoid poor results. Complete resolution of the snapping in the subscapular bursa is not necessary to obtain a satisfactory result.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series, no control group.

Quantitative morphology of the scapula: normal variation of the superomedial scapular angle, and superior and inferior pole thickness

This study examined the normal variation of the superomedial scapular angle and the thickness of the superior and inferior scapular borders. Scapulae of 53 cadaver shoulders were dissected free from all soft tissue. A line was drawn from the most superior to the most inferior point on each scapula, and the scapulae were cut along this line to obtain cross sections. The supero-medial scapular angle (alpha) was measured with a goniometer from the cross section as a ABC: through the inferior tip (A), base of the spine (B), and superior tip (C). Superior and inferior pole thickness was measured with a digital caliper from the thickest portions on the cross section of the poles. Average superomedial angle was 139 degrees +/- 6 degrees (range: 125 degrees - 156 degrees). Average thickness for the superior and inferior poles was 3.9 +/- 0.9 mm (range: 2.1 - 8.3 mm) and 7.5 +/- 1.5 mm (range: 4 - 11 mm), respectively. The thickness of both superior and inferior poles was significantly different between male and female specimens (P < .05), with male scapulae having the higher values.

Nonoperative and operative management of snapping scapula

Snapping scapula is a painful crepitus of the scapulothoracic articulation. This crepitus is a grinding or snapping noise with scapulothoracic motion that may or may not accompany pain. This condition is commonly seen in overhead-throwing athletes. Treatment of patients with this syndrome begins with nonoperative methods; when nonoperative treatment fails, several surgical options exist. This article will discuss both nonoperative and operative management of this common shoulder condition.

The painful scapulothoracic articulation: surgical management

To clarify the indications and effectiveness of surgical decompression for scapulothoracic bursitis, 16 patients were evaluated, who during a 5-year period, had surgical treatment of refractory pain and snapping in the scapulothoracic region. Twelve women and four men with a mean age of 41 years had one of five methods of surgical decompression of the scapulothoracic articulation. Six patients had an open resection of the scapulothoracic bursa with excision of the superomedial portion of the scapula, two had this procedure using an arthroscopic method, and six had a combined approach with arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy and open resection of the superomedial scapula through a small incision. One patient had an arthroscopic and one an open scapulothoracic bursectomy only. At final followup of an average of 36 months (range, 24-69 months), 81% of patients reported satisfaction with the procedure and indicated they would have it again based on the relief they obtained from pain. The Simple Shoulder Test was 9.8 (range, 2-12). Although there was no statistical difference in the success using any given technique, we thought that the combined open and arthroscopic approach was the most effective, and surgical treatment is an acceptable method for treatment of refractory painful scapulothoracic bursitis.