Appreciating the differences between immunoassays used to diagnose maternal parvovirus B19 infection: understanding the antigen before interpreting the results

Comparison of 4 commercial enzyme immunoassays for serology testing of human parvovirus B19 infection

BACKGROUND

Parvovirus B19 is a pathogenic virus often diagnosed by serology, yet little is known about analytical performance of commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate performance of 4 EIAs for parvovirus B19 IgM and IgG: Liaison, Euroimmun, Mikrogen and Virion/Serion.

STUDY DESIGN

To compare 4 EIAs to Biotrin's ELISA on 168 samples and determine consensus score for discordant samples using Mikrogen's confirmatory line assay.

RESULTS

Two thirds of results for IgM/IgG were identical for all 4 EIAs and Biotrin. Liaison shows the highest IgM sensitivity, but has low specificity. Euroimmun lacks IgM sensitivity. Mikrogen had a good overall performance, but had the lowest IgG specificity. Virion/Serion had variable performance with a low IgM specificity and the most borderline and cross-reactive results.

CONCLUSIONS

Liaison and Mikrogen have similar performance to Biotrin's ELISA. Euroimmun lacks sensitivity and Virion/Serion produced many borderline and cross-reactive results.

Diagnosis and management of human parvovirus B19 infection

Parvovirus B19 is a common infection in children occurring in winter and spring months that can affect pregnant women and their unborn fetuses. Adverse fetal sequelae may include red blood cell aplasia due to bone marrow suppression, anemia, myocarditis, nonimmune hydrops, and fetal death. Fortunately, several noninvasive testing schemes are available to assess the fetus, and invasive testing is reserved for fetuses with marked anemia.

Comparison of three commercially available serologic assays used to detect human parvovirus B19-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies in sera of pregnant women

A split-sample study was conducted to evaluate the performances of three enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) utilizing one or more conformational antigens to detect human parvovirus B19 (B19V)-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) or IgG in the sera of 198 pregnant women. We compared EIAs available from Biotrin International, Inc. (Dublin, Ireland), Medac Diagnostika (Wedel, Germany), and Mikrogen (Martinsried, Germany). Specimens with discordant results were analyzed further using an immunofluorescence assay (Biotrin). Equivocal data accounted for close to half of all the discrepant results for both IgM and IgG, with 7 of 15 discrepant results from the Medac and Mikrogen kits involving equivocal data and the Biotrin kit giving a single equivocal result. For each specimen, a consensus was established from the four test results if agreement occurred among at least three of four results. Overall, the highest percentage of agreement with the consensus results was seen when Biotrin kits were used; 194 (100%) of 194 and 194 (99.5%) of 195 results for IgM and IgG, respectively, agreed with the consensus results. When Medac kits were used, 189 (97.4%) of 194 and 191 (97.9%) of 195 results for IgM and IgG, respectively, agreed with the consensus, and when Mikrogen kits were used, 179 (92.3%) of 194 and 193 (99%) of 195 results for IgM and IgG, respectively, agreed with the consensus. Given the consensus results, the Medac EIA appeared to generate presumed false-positive results for IgM and the Mikrogen EIA appeared to generate presumed false-positive results for IgG and IgM. In summary, the Biotrin EIAs produced far fewer equivocal results than the other assays and results of the Biotrin EIAs agreed more often with the consensus results than did those of the other commercially available EIAs for detecting B19V-specific IgM and IgG antibodies.