Tiagabine

Cenobamate tablets as a treatment for focal-onset seizures in adults

Introduction: Despite the introduction of numerous new antiseizure medications (ASMs) still about one-third of epilepsies remain drug-resistant. Therefore, new compounds with advanced efficacy are urgently needed. Cenobamate (CNB) is a new ASM that has been recently introduced in the United States for the treatment of adults with focal-onset seizures. The approval in Europe is under way.Areas covered: This review covers the pharmacological profile of CNB, the proof-of-concept trial, the two double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trials investigating adjunct CNB in adults with focal-onset seizures, one open-label safety trial, and a variety of published abstract material that provided additional post hoc data.Expert opinion: In two placebo-controlled randomized multicenter phase 2 trials adjunct CNB showed unusually high efficacy with rates of seizure-free people with epilepsy (PWE) partially beyond 20%. However, during the clinical program cases of drug-related reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS syndrome) occurred. Therefore, an open-label safety study was performed in more than 1300 PWE with particularly slower titration schedules which did not add more cases with similar reactions. Taking into consideration the promising efficacy and the safety experience from the open-label trial, CNB applied according to the meanwhile recommended titration strategy, might offer a new prospect.

A revisited strategy for antiepileptic drug development in children: designing an initial exploratory step

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in refractory paediatric epilepsy usually involve the two main types of epilepsy shared by children and adults, focal epilepsy and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Most other epilepsy syndromes, specifically paediatric, are excluded from drug development. In order to identify among them the candidate(s) for dedicated RCTs with a new drug, the European Medicine Agency (EMA) recently recommended proceeding in two steps: (1) an exploratory (prospective-observational) trial (POT) including a large variety of paediatric epilepsy syndromes and (2) a subsequent RCT in each of those that disclose a signal for possible efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to address the three following issues that have not been addressed by the EMA: (1) to determine a minimal threshold for this signal; (2) to establish a list of epilepsies to evaluate; and (3) to estimate the number of patients to include in such POTs.

METHODS

We extensively reviewed the POTs (including various syndromes) and RCTs reported in paediatric patients with uncontrolled epilepsy using MEDLINE (from 1990 to 2011) and the Cochrane library. We determined the threshold as the lowest percentage of responders observed in a POT with a positive corresponding RCT. The syndromes that reached this threshold in a POT were those to evaluate in an RCT. The minimal number of patients to include for each syndrome for a POT with a new antiepileptic drug was estimated in order to reach at least this threshold of responders with a 95 % confidence interval.

RESULTS

We found the minimal responder threshold to be 25 %. We identified eight epilepsy types/syndromes reaching this threshold and estimated for each of them the minimal sample needed: refractory focal epilepsy (n = 40), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 32), infantile spasms (n = 50), Dravet syndrome (n = 32), childhood absence epilepsy (n = 12), other symptomatic generalized epilepsy (n = 38), epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spikes and waves during sleep (n = 7) and epilepsy with myoclonic-astatic seizures (n = 4) [the two last samples may be underestimated due to the lack of RCTs in these conditions].

CONCLUSION

Among the eight epilepsy types/syndromes that we recommend to systematically include in exploratory trials using the POT procedure, we assume that, for the minimal sample given above, a responder threshold of 25 % will provide a reliable efficacy signal, to be confirmed by a dedicated RCT. This strategy should avoid missing new therapeutic possibilities for children with epilepsy and reduce the off-label use of drugs in paediatric neurology.

Regulation of the expression of GABAA receptor subunits by an antiepileptic drug QYS

It has been reported that the antiepileptic drug qingyangshenylycosides (QYS) modulated the function of GABAergic system. However, little is known about the effects of QYS on the gene expression of GABA receptors in the central nervous system (CNS). In the present study, we examined the effects of QYS on the expression of GABAA receptor subunits in different regions of the mouse brain. The results showed that treatment of QYS significantly increased the expressions of Gabra1, Gabra2 and Gabr4 and decreased the expression of Gabrg2 in inferior colliculus. Moreover, Gabrb2 expression was up-regulated and Gabra5 was down-regulated in hippocampus, while the expressions of Gabra1 and Gabrb2 were induced in cortex after QYS treatment. These data indicated that QYS had different effects on the expression of GABAA receptor subunits in different brain regions. These results may help to reveal the molecular mechanism of anticonvulsant action of QYS.

Treatment of partial seizures in childhood : an overview

The treatment of partial seizures in children is based on the use of first generation and recently introduced antiepileptic drugs as well as nonpharmacological treatments such as the ketogenic diet, vagus nerve stimulation and surgical therapy. The present review discusses the efficacy and tolerability of different treatment options for partial seizures in childhood. Few adjunctive or monotherapy, placebo-controlled or comparative trials of the first-generation antiepileptic drugs and some of the more recently introduced antiepileptic drugs have been performed in children. This can be explained by the fact that it is only relatively recently (1989) that the International League against Epilepsy proposed that randomised, controlled trials be included among the required criteria for assessing the efficacy and tolerability of an antiepileptic agent. This led to controlled, comparative trials among older antiepileptic drugs (phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid), both in adults and in paediatric patients, being performed relatively 'late', based on when these drugs were first introduced. Carbamazepine and valproic acid may still be considered as first-line antiepileptic therapies for children with partial seizures. Phenobarbital and phenytoin are mostly considered as last choice drugs because of their adverse event profiles. The new generation of antiepileptic agents has added to the first- and second-line treatment options for paediatric partial seizures. To date, there are sufficient data to support the clinical use of some of the recently introduced antiepileptic drugs (e.g. oxcarbazepine, topiramate, gabapentin and lamotrigine) as adjunctive or first-line monotherapy. Because of the risk of visual field constriction with vigabatrin, the use of this drug is currently limited to patients refractory to other medications. Tiagabine, felbamate, levetiracetam and zonisamide have been shown to be effective in adults with partial seizures; however, at present there are not yet enough data on the efficacy of these drugs in children to support consideration of their use as either first-line or add-on therapy in this patient population, although controlled studies are expected shortly. Furthermore, the use of felbamate is considerably limited by rare, but severe, hepatic and haematological toxicity. Controlled trials for paediatric partial seizures are still lacking for the ketogenic diet and vagus nerve stimulation, though they may represent, in given patients, useful adjunctive alternative treatments for refractory partial seizures. In conclusion, further trials are needed to determine an optimal sequence of first- and second-line therapies and to establish whether other newer antiepileptic drugs merit consideration as initial therapy in children with partial seizures.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with partial seizures: an open-label trial

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) as adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures.

METHODS

Children (aged 6-12 years) with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures receiving one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) were eligible. After a 4-week baseline period, children received LEV in a 6-week titration phase (target dose, 40 mg/kg/day) followed by an 8-week evaluation phase. Seizure frequency during the evaluation period with individualized LEV doses (20-40 mg/kg/day) were compared with the 4-week baseline seizure frequency. Plasma concentrations of LEV and other AEDs were determined to evaluate potential drug interactions.

RESULTS

Twenty-four subjects enrolled and received LEV; 23 entered the evaluation phase, and 22 completed the evaluation phase. Compared with their baseline seizure frequency, 12 (52%) of 23 subjects entering the evaluation phase had their seizure frequency decrease by >50%. Two subjects remained seizure free during the entire evaluation period. LEV did not significantly affect plasma concentrations of any concomitant AED during this study, and no alteration of mean clinical laboratory values was observed. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, infection, anorexia, and somnolence.

CONCLUSIONS

This open-label study of adjunctive LEV therapy (at 20-40 mg/kg/day) suggests that LEV is effective, safe, and well tolerated in children ages 6-12 years with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of LEV adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures is needed and ongoing to confirm these open-label findings.

Tiagabine (gabitril) experience in children

Tiagabine (TGB) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures in adults and children aged 12 years and older. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of TGB treatment are under way in younger children with various forms of epilepsy. The results of pediatric pharmacokinetic trials indicate patterns similar to those seen in adults. An open-label study was conducted in the United States in 31 children with refractory complex partial seizures, with doses escalated every 2 weeks by 0.25 mg/kg up to a maximal daily dose of 1 mg/kg. Twenty-nine patients were treated with TGB for >1 year; 26 completed the study, of whom 18 were receiving monotherapy at study completion. A European dose-escalation study evaluated TGB (0.25-1.5 mg/kg/day) as add-on therapy in 52 children aged 2-15 years. TGB appeared to be more effective in localization-related epilepsy syndromes, with 17 of 23 patients with localization-related epilepsy having a 33% median reduction of seizure rate compared with baseline in the fourth month of treatment, and six patients having > or =50% seizure rate reduction. In this study, myoclonic seizures and spasms showed a poor response as opposed to encouraging findings reported by other groups with these seizure types. The adverse effect profile of TGB in children with epilepsy is similar to that in adults. In the U.S. study, most common adverse events were related to the central nervous system (CNS) and decreased over time. In the European study, mostly mild to moderate adverse events, including asthenia (19%), nervousness (19%), dizziness (17%), and somnolence (17%), were reported by 83% of TGB-treated children (39% of children reported adverse events during the single-blind placebo period). In summary, preliminary pediatric data with TGB suggest particular efficacy against epilepsy characterized by partial seizures or other syndromes, and further investigation is warranted.

Oxcarbazepine in the treatment of epilepsy

Oxcarbazepine is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been registered in more than 50 countries worldwide since 1990 and recently received approval in the United States and the European Union. Oxcarbazepine is a keto analog of carbamazepine and has a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration and undergoes rapid and almost complete reductive metabolism to form the pharmacologically active 10-monohydroxy derivative. Oxcarbazepine exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, no autoinduction, and minimal interaction with other AEDs. Ten controlled trials demonstrated that oxcarbazepine is safe and efficacious in the treatment of partial seizures across a wide range of ages (children to adults), situations (recent onset to treatment-resistant epilepsy), and uses (monotherapy and adjunctive therapy). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events are related to the central nervous system. Treatment-emergent hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium level < 125 mEq/L) occurred in 3% of patients treated with oxcarbazepine in clinical trials. According to the efficacy and safety profile established in the controlled trials, oxcarbazepine represents an important new treatment option indicated for monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in adults with partial seizures and as adjunctive therapy in children aged 4 years or older with partial seizures. Although structurally similar to carbamazepine, significant differences exist in the pharmacokinetics, drug interaction potential, adverse-effect profile, and dosage and titration between these two agents, and they should be considered distinct therapeutic agents.

Status epilepticus and tiagabine therapy: review of safety data and epidemiologic comparisons

PURPOSE

To determine whether an increased risk of status epilepticus (SE) and complex partial status epilepticus (CPSE) is associated with tiagabine (TGB) therapy.

METHODS

Thirteen cases in which an EEG, performed on patients with altered mental status taking TGB, was reported to demonstrate spike-and-wave discharges (SWDs) were reviewed by a panel of experts. In addition, all cases of suspected SE from TGB clinical trials were reviewed. The occurrence of SE in four epidemiologic cohorts from Rochester, Minnesota, Turku, Finland, Bronx, New York, and New Haven, Connecticut was analyzed as an external comparison.

RESULTS

Review of the 13 cases with reported SWDs found that the majority had had prior EEGs with similar findings, and only three were thought to have electrographic evidence of SE. There was no difference in the frequency of SE or CPSE in the placebo-controlled clinical trials between the TGB-treated (1.0% SE, 0.8% CPSE) and placebo-treated (1.5% SE, 1.5% CPSE) groups. The 5% frequency of SE and 3% frequency of CPSE in the TGB-treated patients in the long-term safety studies, which included 2,248 patients, were very similar to the rates of occurrence of SE and CPSE in the four external cohorts. The major risk factor for the occurrence of SE and CPSE in all groups was a prior episode of SE (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 3-year period, SE will occur in 5-10% of patients with epilepsy not in remission. At highest risk are those who have had a prior episode of SE. Treatment with TGB in recommended doses does not increase the risk of SE in patients with partial seizures.

Tiagabine adjunctive therapy in children with refractory epilepsy: a single-blind dose escalating study

Tiagabine, a specific gamma-aminobutyric acid-uptake inhibitor, has been shown to be reasonably well tolerated and efficacious as adjunctive treatment for partial seizures in adults and is now being investigated in children. This 4-month, single-blind study evaluated the tolerability, safety and preliminary efficacy of ascending doses (0.25-1.5 mg/kg/day) of tiagabine add-on therapy in 52 children over the age of 2 years with different syndromes of refractory epilepsy. Adverse events, mostly mild to moderate, were reported by 39% of children during the single-blind placebo period and by 83% of children during tiagabine treatment. The events predominantly affected the nervous system with asthenia (19%), nervousness (19%), dizziness (17%) and somnolence (17%) being the most common. Only three children (6%) withdrew because of adverse events. Tiagabine appeared to reduce seizures more in localisation-related epilepsy syndromes than in generalised epilepsy syndromes. Twenty-three patients with localisation-related epilepsy syndromes were included and 17 of these patients entered the fourth dosing period. The 17 patients had a median reduction of seizure rate in the fourth month of treatment of 33% compared with baseline. In comparison, 13 of 22 children with seven different generalised epilepsy syndromes entered the fourth dosing period with a median change of seizure rate of 0%. Two patients experienced single episodes of status epilepticus during treatment; both cases resolved. Tiagabine showed efficacy mainly in localisation-related syndromes and was well tolerated by most children in a group of very refractory patients and warrants further study in children with epilepsy.

Tiagabine: absence of kinetic or dynamic interactions with ethanol

Tiagabine is a new antiepileptic drug that inhibits the uptake of gamma-aminobutyric acid into neurons and glia. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the effect of multiple doses of tiagabine on the adverse cognitive effects produced by a single dose of ethanol in 20 healthy volunteers. The effects of each drug on the pharmaco-kinetics of the other were also determined. Compared with placebo, tiagabine produced no statistically significant effects on digit vigilance speed (primary assessment variable) or accuracy, choice reaction time, immediate or delayed word recall, delayed word recognition speed or sensitivity, visual tracking, body sway, or subjective measures of alertness, calmness, and contentment. There was no evidence of a pharmacodynamic interaction between tiagabine and ethanol with respect to these variables. The pharmacokinetic parameters of tiagabine and ethanol (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], time to Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve) were unchanged during concomitant administration. Adverse events, which mainly affected the central nervous system, occurred with a similar incidence during tiagabine and placebo administration and were more common after the administration of ethanol. There appears to be no need for additional caution regarding driving or operating machinery when ethanol is administered to patients taking tiagabine.

Activity-dependent enhancement of hyperpolarizing and depolarizing gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) synaptic responses following inhibition of GABA uptake by tiagabine

The effects of the 7-aminobutyric acid (GABA) uptake blocker tiagabine on isolated inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) were examined in CA1 pyramidal cells of the rat hippocampal slice preparation. The IPSPs were elicited by either single stimuli or by high frequency (100 Hz, 200 ms) stimulation (HFS) of inhibitory interneurons. Bath applied tiagabine (20 microM) produced little or no increase in the amplitude of IPSPs evoked by low (30-50 microA) or high (200-400 microA) intensity single stimuli. Only the duration of IPSPs evoked by high intensity stimuli was substantially prolonged by tiagabine, the time integral of the hyperpolarizing response being increased 3.2-fold. HFS elicited much larger fast and slow IPSPs than a single stimulus. In addition, with increments in the intensity (80-550 microA) of HFS, a GABA(A) receptor-mediated depolarizing response of progressively larger amplitude appeared between, and overlapped with, the fast and slow hyperpolarizing components of the IPSP. Tiagabine application markedly increased the GABA-mediated responses evoked by both low and high intensity HFS. Increasing the intensity of HFS enhanced the drug effect. Thus, measurements of the time integral of evoked responses showed that with weak (60 microA) HFS, tiagabine caused a 3.6-fold increase in the area of hyperpolarization while, in contrast, with strong (530 microA) HFS, tiagabine produced a 13.5-fold increase in the depolarizing actions of GABA. Our results suggest that tiagabine, a therapeutically effective anticonvulsant, may paradoxically increase, through a GABA(A) receptor-mediated mechanism, neuronal depolarization during the high frequency discharge of neurons involved in epileptiform activity.

Tiagabine: a novel antiepileptic drug

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of tiagabine, including its pharmacology, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, efficacy, adverse effects, and dosing recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized search of the MEDLINE database from 1966 to December 1997 was used to identify publications related to tiagabine and nipecotic acid derivatives. Included in this review was information gathered from scientific meetings. Manufacturer's information was used when there was no primary literature.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Tiagabine amplifies gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission, the predominant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. Its mechanism of action is selective and has shown promise as an antiepileptic drug (AED) in patients with seizures refractory to other pharmaceutical products. Tiagabine exhibits dose-independent absorption, 90-95% bioavailability, high protein binding (96%), metabolism via hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP3A subfamily), and displays first-order elimination pharmacokinetics. The mean plasma half-life is 5-8 hours. Concomitant medications that induce hepatic metabolism enhance tiagabine elimination; metabolism is reduced in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Adverse events of tiagabine typically involve the central nervous system, have been mild to moderate in intensity, and also have been transient in nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Tiagabine has demonstrated a good safety profile and, while it has not been demonstrated to be superior to other second-line AEDs for partial seizures, its safety and select mechanism of action warrant its further evaluation in the clinical setting. Tiagabine should be a good alternative add-on agent for patients with unsatisfactory seizure control or intolerable adverse effects of traditional therapies; thus, this agent should be made available to these patients.