Palliative care in the surgical intensive care unit

Sudden Advanced Illness: An Emerging Concept Among Palliative Care and Surgical Critical Care Physicians

BACKGROUND

End-of-life discussions in critically-ill patients with acute surgical conditions may be rushed and occur earlier during hospitalization. This study explores the concept of sudden advanced illness (SAI) and its relevance to patients requiring Palliative and Surgical Critical Care.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were completed with 16 physicians, querying each about (1) definitional components, (2) illustrative cases, and (3) comfort with SAI. Analysis was done by grounded theory.

RESULTS

SAI was characterized as unforeseen, emerging abruptly and producing devastating injury, often in healthy, younger patients. There is (1) prognostic uncertainty, (2) loss of capacity, and (3) unprepared surrogate decision-making. Cases are emotionally-charged and often personal.

CONCLUSION

The emerging concept of SAI is important for understanding how Palliative Care can enhance care for this subset of patients.

Purpura fulminans managed with multi-limb amputation: substituted judgment and surrogate decision-making in the surgical management of necrotizing soft tissue infections

BACKGROUND

Purpura fulminans (PF) is a rare but lethal complication of severe infection. Aggressive surgical debridement of irreversibly devitalized tissue improves survival frequently at the cost of disfigurement. The ethical dilemma of surrogate decision-making for these often incapacitated patients presents a unique challenge for acute care surgeons managing necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI).

METHODS

Case presentation and scholarly discussion of substituted judgment.

RESULTS

A previously healthy 72-y-old fisherman developed PF as a consequence of Neisseria meningiditis severe sepsis requiring bilateral partial finger amputations and bilateral below-knee amputations of the affected gangrenous extremities. Skin biopsy confirmed the clinical impression of disseminated intra-vascular coagulation (DIC). During his 55-d hospitalization, medical decisions were made by a surrogate because the patient's mental status failed to recover to his pre-morbid baseline. A literature review revealed a paucity of data on the accuracy of a health care agent's ability to represent a patient's preferences accurately in elective as well as emergency surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NSTI and the surgeons who care for them are often confronted with the need to make prompt decisions of radical debridement or amputation. These patients are frequently incapable of making these decisions because of the severity of systemic illness. In such cases, physicians must help patient surrogates or health care agents (when identified) navigate a complex process of acute interventions balancing known or inferred patient's wishes. We urge surgeons to become familiar with the concept of substituted judgment and the challenges of surrogate decision-making.

Changing end-of-life care practice for liver transplant service patients: structured palliative care intervention in the surgical intensive care unit

CONTEXT

Patients, families, and surgeons often have high expectations of life-saving surgery following liver transplantation (LT), despite the presence of a severe life-limiting underlying illness. Hence, transition from curative to palliative care is difficult and may create conflicts around goals of care.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that early communication with physicians/families would improve end-of-life care practice in the LT service patients.

METHODS

Prospective, observational, pre/poststudy of consecutive LT service, surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients, before and after a palliative care intervention was integrated. This included Part I (at admission), family support, prognosis, and patient preferences delineation; and Part II (within 72 hours), interdisciplinary family meeting. Data on goals-of-care discussions, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, withdrawal of life support, and family perceptions were collected.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine LT patients with 21 deaths comprised the baseline group and 104 patients with 31 deaths the intervention group. Eighty-five percent of patients received Part I and 58% Part II of the intervention. Goals-of-care discussions on physician rounds increased from 2% to 38% of patient-days. During the intervention, although mortality rates were unchanged, DNR status increased (52-81%); withdrawal of life support increased (35-68%); DNR was instituted earlier; admission to DNR decreased (mean of 38-19 days); DNR to death time increased (two to four days); and SICU mean length of stay decreased (by three days). Family responses suggested more "time with family"/"time to say goodbye."

CONCLUSION

Interdisciplinary communication interventions with physicians and families resulted in earlier consensus around goals of care for dying LT patients. Early integration of palliative care alongside disease-directed curative care can be accomplished in the SICU without change in mortality and has the ability to improve end-of-life care practice in LT patients.

The palliative care model for emergency department patients with advanced illness

BACKGROUND

Large gaps in the delivery of palliative care services exist in the outpatient setting, where there is a failure to address goals of care and to plan for and treat predictable crises. While not originally considered an ideal environment to deliver palliative care services, the emergency department presents a key decision point at which providers set the course for a patient's subsequent trajectory and goals of care. Many patients with serious and life-threatening illness present to emergency departments because symptoms, such as pain or nausea and vomiting, cannot be controlled at home, in an assisted living facility, or in a provider's office. Even for patients in whom goals of care are clear, families often need support for their loved one's physical as well as mental distress. The emergency department is often the only place that can provide needed interventions (e.g., intravenous fluids or pain medications) as well as immediate access to advanced diagnostic tests (e.g. computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging).

DISCUSSION

Palliative care services provide relief of burdensome symptoms, attention to spiritual and social concerns, goal setting, and patient-provider communication that are often not addressed in the acute care setting. While emergency providers could provide some of these services, there is a knowledge gap regarding palliative care in the emergency department setting. Emergency department-based palliative care programs are currently consultations for symptoms and/or goals of care, and have been initiated both by both the palliative care team and palliative care champions in the emergency department. Some programs have focused on the provision of hospice services through partnerships with hospice providers, which can potentially help emergency department providers with disposition.

CONCLUSION

Although some data on pilot programs are available, optimal models of delivery of emergency department-based palliative care have not been rigorously studied. Research is needed to determine how these services are best organized, what affect they will have on patients and caregivers, and whether they can decrease symptom burden and health care utilization.

Effect of a regular family visiting program as an affective, auditory, and tactile stimulation on the consciousness level of comatose patients with a head injury

AIM

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a regular family visiting program, as an auditory, affective, and tactile stimulation, on the consciousness level of comatose head injury patients.

METHOD

A randomized controlled trial design was used. Fifty comatose head injury patients were randomly allocated into a control group or an intervention group. The consciousness level of the patients in both groups was evaluated and recorded by the Glasgow Coma Scale, before and 30 min after the visiting program.

RESULTS

The independent t-test results demonstrated that the means of the consciousness level at the first day before intervention had no significant difference in both groups. The repeated measured ANOVA results demonstrated that the consciousness level alterations were significant between the two groups over the 6 days of intervention.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study provided evidence to support that a regular family visiting program could induce the stimulation of comatose patients. Therefore, it can be considered as a potential nursing intervention.

Perspectives on palliative care in Lebanon: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of medical and nursing specialties

Objective:

Our objective was to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of physicians and nurses on Palliative Care (PC) in Lebanon, across specialties.

Method:

We performed a cross-sectional descriptive survey using a self-administered questionnaire; the total number of completed and returned questionnaires was 868, giving a 23% response rate, including 74.31% nurses (645) and 25.69% physicians (223).

Results:

Significant differences were found between medical and surgical nurses and physicians concerning their perceptions of patients' and families' outbursts, concerns, and questions. Knowledge scores were statistically associated with practice scores and degree. Practice scores were positively associated with continuing education in PC, exposure to terminally ill patients, and knowledge and attitude scores. Acute critical care and oncology were found to have lower practice scores than other specialties.

Significance of results:

Formal education in palliative care and development of palliative care services are very much needed in Lebanon to provide holistic care to terminally ill patients.

Defining and measuring quality palliative and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit

Quality of health care is primarily concerned with the provision of health services that intend to lead to valued health outcomes and are based and driven by evidence. Among other desired health outcomes are patient-and-family-centered values consistent with proficient palliative and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. The research in palliative and end-of-life care has elucidated important domains for quality care-in general, major targets for improvement are known. However, assessment of quality at local and national levels remains relevant as innovators select where to begin quality improvement efforts and the healthcare system evaluates the efficacy and potential harm from care delivery transformations. In this article, I endeavor to impart a practical framework for quality of end-of-life care assessment with the goal of guiding the selection of initiatives and evaluating cycles of innovation. I will ground this quality evaluation by reviewing palliative and end-of-life care and the known domains for quality palliative care. Although the field has identified candidate indicators for evaluating palliative and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit, future work is needed to operationalize assessment for important aspects of care with valid, reliable, acceptable, efficient, and responsive measures.

Sex differences in creation of do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill elderly patients following emergency surgery

BACKGROUND

Emergency surgery patients are older, often critically ill, and at high risk of morbidity and mortality. We studied factors associated with issuance of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order and impact on morbidity and mortality in emergency surgery patients.

METHODS

Prospective study of all patients since January 1, 2000 who underwent emergency surgery before admission to the intensive care unit. Data collected were: age, sex, admission diagnosis (case-mix), raw- (AIII) and age-adjusted (aAIII) APACHE III scores, issuance of a DNR order, and morbidity and mortality. Primary outcomes were DNR status and morbidity and mortality. Groups were stratified by age (patients >75 years versus younger) and sex. Statistics were calculated by chi(2) test, analysis of variance, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

In all, 723 emergency surgery patients (gastrointestinal: 35%; traumatic: 20%; neurologic: 17%) met study criteria and had morbidity and mortality of 17.8% (AIII-predicted: 31%). Ninety-two patients (12%) were made DNR, of whom 82.6% died. Women received DNR status more often (16.4% versus 9.5%, p < 0.01) but morbidity and mortality was the same for women and men (18.2% versus 17.5%, p = 0.85). By logistic regression, sex most predicted new DNR status (odds ratio [OR] 2.512, p = 0.005) compared with Multiple Organ Dysfunction score (OR 1.410, p < 0.0001), Age (OR 1.054, p < 0.0001) and aAIII (OR 0.995, 0.355), with goodness of fit of 3.876 (p = 0.868) and Nagelkerke R(2) of 0.511. Percent correct was 88.9, implying good discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex and, to a lesser extent, age were associated with issuance of DNR in series of patients who received emergency surgery. The association of DNR with female sex is an unexpected finding and may indicate clinician bias and necessitate the performance of further analysis.

Ethics of palliative surgery in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an important palliative method for patients with advanced malignant disease. In addition to concerns related to clinical decision making, various moral challenges are encountered in palliative surgery. Some of these relate to the patients and their illness, others to the surgeons, their attitudes, skills and knowledge base.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Pertinent moral challenges are addressed and analysed with respect to prevailing perspectives in normative ethics. The vulnerability of patients with non-curable cancer calls for moral awareness. Demands regarding sensibility and precaution in this clinical setting represent substantial challenges with regard to the 'duty to help', benevolence, respect of autonomy and proper patient information. Moreover, variations in definition of palliative surgery as well as limited scientific evidence with respect to efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency pose methodological and moral problems. Therefore, a definition of palliative surgery that addresses these issues is provided.

CONCLUSION

Both surgical skill and much moral sensibility are required to improve palliative care in surgical oncology. This should be taken into account not only in clinical practice but also in education and research.

Ethical Issues in Surgical Palliative Care: Am I Killing the Patient by “Letting Him Go”?

Recent medical advances have complicated decisions regarding terminal care. Surgeons should be familiar with the ethical issues that contribute to end-of-life decision-making. Four clusters of ethical principles (autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice)are used commonly in ethical deliberations. Artificial ethical distinctions between withholding versus withdrawing care or ordinary versus extraordinary treatments can confuse clinical decision-making at the end of life. An ethics of death and dying requires that the intent and the action of the moral agent be considered.

Social work competencies in palliative and end-of-life care

Social workers from clinical, academic, and research settings met in 2002 for a national Social Work Leadership Summit on Palliative and End-of-Life Care. Participants placed the highest priority on the development and broad dissemination of a summary document of the state-of-the-art practice of social work in palliative and end-of-life care. Nine Summit participants reviewed the literature and constructed this detailed description of the knowledge, skills, and values that are requisite for the unique, essential, and appropriate role of social work. This comprehensive statement delineates individual, family, group, team, community, and organizational interventions that extend across settings, cultures, and populations and encompasses advocacy, education, training, clinical practice, community organization, administration, supervision, policy, and research. This document is intended to guide preparation and credentialing of professional social workers, to assist interdisciplinary colleagues in their collaboration with social workers, and to provide the background for the testing of quality indicators and "best practice" social work interventions.

Pain management in the intensive care unit

Pain management is an essential component of quality care delivery for the critically ill patient. Because outcomes are difficult to predict in the intensive care unit (ICU), high-quality pain management and palliative therapy should be a goal for every patient. For those patients actively dying, palliation may be among the main benefits offered by the health care team. Appropriate palliation of pain begins with the use of effective strategies for recognizing, evaluating,and monitoring pain. Skill in pain management requires knowledge of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies. This article focuses on expertise in the use of opiates to facilitate confident and appropriate pain therapy. To optimize palliative therapy, symptoms are best addressed by interdisciplinary care teams guided by models that acknowledge a continuum of curative therapies and palliative care.