Detection of telomerase activity in prostatic fluid specimens

A cancer specific hypermethylation signature of the TERT promoter predicts biochemical relapse in prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study

The identification of new biomarkers to differentiate between indolent and aggressive prostate tumors is an important unmet need. We examined the role of THOR (TERT Hypermethylated Oncological Region) as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).We analyzed THOR in common cancers using genome-wide methylation arrays. Methylation status of the whole TERT gene in benign and malignant prostate samples was determined by MeDIP-Seq. The prognostic role of THOR in PCa was assessed by pyrosequencing on discovery and validation cohorts from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up data.Most cancers (n = 3056) including PCa (n = 300) exhibited hypermethylation of THOR. THOR was the only region within the TERT gene that is differentially methylated between normal and malignant prostate tissue (p < 0.0001). Also, THOR was significantly hypermethylated in PCa when compared to paired benign tissues (n = 164, p < 0.0001). THOR hypermethylation correlated with Gleason scores and was associated with tumor invasiveness (p = 0.0147). Five years biochemical progression free survival (BPFS) for PCa patients in the discovery cohort was 87% (95% CI 73-100) and 65% (95% CI 52-78) for THOR non-hypermethylated and hypermethylated cancers respectively (p = 0.01). Similar differences in BPFS were noted in the validation cohort (p = 0.03). Importantly, THOR was able to predict outcome in the challenging (Gleason 6 and 7 (3 + 4)) PCa (p = 0.007). For this group, THOR was an independent risk factor for BPFS with a hazard-ratio of 3.685 (p = 0.0247). Finally, THOR hypermethylation more than doubled the risk of recurrence across all PSA levels (OR 2.5, p = 0.02).

The potential utility of telomere-related markers for cancer diagnosis

The role telomeres and telomerase play in the initiation and progression of human cancers has been extensively evaluated. Telomeres are nucleoprotein complexes comprising the hexanucleotide DNA repeat sequence, TTAGGG and numerous telomere-associated proteins, including the six member Shelterin complex. The main function of the telomere is to stabilize the ends of the chromosomes. However, through multiple mechanisms, telomeres can become dysfunctional, which may drive genomic instability leading to the development of cancer. The majority of human cancers maintain, or actively lengthen, telomeres through up-regulation of the reverse transcriptase telomerase. Because there are significant differences in telomere length and telomerase activity between malignant and non-malignant tissues, many investigations have assessed the potential to utilize these molecular markers for cancer diagnosis. Here, we critically evaluate whether measurements of telomere lengths and telomerase levels may be clinically utilized as diagnostic markers in solid tumours, with emphasis on breast and prostate cancer as representative examples. Future directions focusing on the direct detection of dysfunctional telomeres are explored. New markers for telomere dysfunction may eventually prove clinically useful.

Putative tissue markers in prostate cancer

A variety of putative prostate cancer markers have been described in human serum, urine, seminal fluid, and histological specimens. These markers exhibit varying capacities to detect prostate cancer and to predict disease course. In order to be considered markers for diagnosis or prognosis of disease course, and to be brought forward for large-scale clinical evaluation, they should fulfill several criteria. Firstly, there should be a biological or therapeutic rationale for choosing the marker, or at least a consistent association with disease presence, disease characteristics such as stage, or disease aggressiveness. Secondly, there should be an assessment of the strength of marker association with disease outcome. Thirdly, the marker should be assessed as an independent predictor in a multivariate analysis.

Molecular PCA3 diagnostics on prostatic fluid

BACKGROUND

The PCA3 test on urine can improve specificity in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and could prevent unnecessary prostate biopsies. In this study, we evaluated the PCA3 test on prostatic fluid and compared this with the PCA3 test on urine in a clinical research setting.

METHODS

Prostatic fluid and urine samples from 67 men were collected following digital rectal examination (DRE). The sediments were analyzed using the quantitative APTIMA PCA3 test. The results were compared with prostate biopsy results.

RESULTS

Using a PCA3 score of 66 as a cut-off value, the test on prostatic fluid had 65% sensitivity for the detection of PCa, 82% specificity and a negative predictive value of 82%. At a cut-off value of 43, the test on urine had 61% sensitivity, 80% specificity and a negative predictive value of 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCA3 test can be performed on both urine and prostatic fluid in the diagnosis of PCa with comparable results.

Telomeres and telomerase in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer biology

Telomeres are terminal, repeated deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences that stabilize and protect the ends of the chromosomes. Mounting evidence indicates that by initiating chromosomal instability, short dysfunctional telomeres may be involved in prostate carcinogenesis. Although the exact cause of the telomere shortening observed in prostate cancer remains a mystery, telomere loss is known to occur during cell division and oxidative DNA damage, 2 byproducts of chronic inflammation, which is a common histologic finding in the prostate. In addition to prostate cancer causation, telomeres may also play a role in disease progression, and there are indications that tumor telomere content may prove useful as a prognostic marker. Once established, prostate cancer cells almost invariably activate the telomeric DNA polymerase enzyme telomerase, the detection of which may prove useful for diagnostic purposes. Interestingly, telomerase activity is suppressed in prostate cancer cells after androgen withdrawal, raising the possibility that androgen ablative therapies may re-instigate telomere loss, and consequent genetic instability, in surviving cancer cells, thus contributing to the emergence of an androgen-independent, lethal phenotype. A more thorough understanding of telomere biology as it relates to prostate cancer should provide new opportunities for disease prevention, diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment.

Real-Time Quantification of Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase mRNA in the Plasma of Patients with Prostate Cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential diagnostic value of quantitative analysis of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA in plasma for noninvasive diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Expression levels of hTERT were analyzed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR in 68 patients showing elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and a control group of 44 healthy volunteers. Sensitivity and specificity were determined and compared to the corresponding PSA values. Median values for hTERT gene expression in the PCa patients (0.72 ng; range 0.01-12.86) were statistically significantly higher (P < 0.001) than in the control group (0.13 ng; 0.02-0.35). Patients with clinically confirmed prostatitis showed lower plasma hTERT expression than PCa patients (0.29; 0.01-66.07). At a cutoff value of 0.35 sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PCa were 81% and 60%, respectively. We suggest that hTERT mRNA in plasma is a very specific and sensitive method that may aid to differentiate between malignant and nonmalignant prostate tissue and may be a useful marker (in combination with PSA) for early PCa diagnosis.

Noninvasive Detection of Prostate Cancer by Quantitative Analysis of Telomerase Activity

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer is the most common male malignancy and the second leading cause of male cancer death; therefore, there is urgent necessity for noninvasive assays for early detection of prostate cancer. Obtaining prostate tumor samples surgically is problematic because the malignancy is heterogeneous and multifocal and early-stage tumors are nonpalpable. In contrast, exfoliated cells represent the cancer status of the entire gland better due to the general tendency of cancer cells to exfoliate into biological fluids. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether quantitative analysis of telomerase activity in exfoliated cells in urine could serve as a reliable molecular marker of prostate malignancy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed prospectively post-prostatic examination-exfoliated cells from the urine of 56 patients undergoing routine prostate screening. Epithelial cells were isolated and enriched by immunomagnetic separation. Telomerase activity was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR telomeric-repeat amplification protocol assay using Opticon MJ research instrument.

RESULTS

We report now that all prostate cancer patients revealed high levels of telomerase activity thereby showing 100% of the assay sensitivity. In contrast, the majority of patients with clinically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) did not express any telomerase activity (70% of all BPH patients), most likely presenting cancer-free cases, or expressed low levels of activity (18%). However, about 12% of BPH patients revealed high levels of telomerase activity that potentially can reflect hidden prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that the quantitative analysis of telomerase activity can be useful for the selection of prostate cancer and cancer-free cases.

Prostate cancer molecular markers GSTP1 and hTERT in expressed prostatic secretions as predictors of biopsy results

OBJECTIVES

To develop noninvasive diagnostic tools for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Current screening for PCa lacks sensitivity and specificity. Two molecular markers, telomerase activity and aberrant methylation of the glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) promoter, are found in more than 90% of PCa specimens. Additionally, these markers can be detected in bodily fluids such as urine and postprostatic massage urethral washes.

METHODS

Expressed prostatic secretions (EPS) from men being evaluated for PCa were analyzed for human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression (the critical factor for telomerase activity) and GSTP1 methylation status. The results were compared with the prostate needle biopsy findings.

RESULTS

EPS could be obtained from 86% of all subjects, and 90% of these samples yielded sufficient RNA and/or DNA for assaying. hTERT expression from EPS (n = 49) had 36% sensitivity and 66% specificity, and GSTP1 methylation from EPS (n = 58) had 46% sensitivity and 56% specificity for the detection of PCa. The combined analysis (n = 32) of hTERT and GSTP1 had 73% sensitivity and 43% specificity, giving a positive predictive value of 40% and a negative predictive value of 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that EPS can be successfully obtained and easily tested for hTERT expression and GSTP1 methylation. Tests with a high negative predictive value, such as our combination assay results, could be useful in augmenting current PCa diagnostic procedures. For example, the examination of EPS for hTERT and GSTP1 methylation in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level might be used in predicting which patients will have negative biopsies. The use of this assay could potentially eliminate up to 30% of costly and invasive needle biopsies.

Detection of Prostate Cancer and Predicting Progression

Carcinoma of the prostate is the second leading cause of male cancer-related death in the United States. Better indicators of prostate cancer presence and progression are needed to avoid unnecessary treatment, predict disease course, and develop more effective therapy. Numerous molecular markers have been described in human serum, urine, seminal fluid, and histological specimens that exhibit varying capacities to detect prostate cancer and predict disease course. However, to date, few of these markers have been adequately validated for clinical use. The purpose of this review is to examine the current status of these markers in prostate cancer and to assess the diagnostic potential for future markers from identified genes and molecules that display loss, mutation, or alteration in expression between tumor and normal prostate tissues. In this review we cite 91 molecular markers that display some level of correlation with prostate cancer presence, disease progression, cancer recurrence, prediction of response to therapy, and/or disease-free survival. We suggest criteria to consider when selecting a marker for further development as a clinical tool and discuss five examples of markers (chromogranin A, glutathione S-transferase pi 1, prostate stem cell antigen, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and telomerase reverse transcriptase) that fulfill some of these criteria. Finally, we discuss how to conduct evaluations of candidate prostate cancer markers and some of the issues involved in the validation process.

Detection of telomerase activity in prostate massage samples improves differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE

We performed a case-control study in which we tested the ability of a non-invasive assay to detect telomerase activity and to distinguish between prostatic cancer (Pca) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on samples of epithelial cells obtained after prostatic massage.

METHODS

Telomerase activity was determined by a telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay. We selected 60 patients with histologically proven Pca (30 cases) or BPH (30 cases). Specimens included in this study were from patients who had no suspicious findings on digital rectal examination for cancer, had clinical evidence of lower urinary tract symptoms, had no sonographic signs of Pca at the transrectal ultrasound evaluation, had total PSA values moderately elevated (2.6-15 ng/ml), and had no evidence of other urological cancers. The whole procedure was conducted in double blind between pathologists and molecular biology operators.

RESULTS

Telomerase activity was detected in 90% of Pca cases and in 13% of BPH cases. The sensitivity (90%) and specificity (76%) of this method were calculated. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic efficiency were 87%, 90%, and 88% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that telomerase activity detected by TRAP assay on prostate epithelial cells collected by prostate massage can substantially improve the distinction between Pca and BPH conditions. One of the clinical benefits resulting from the use of this new assay would be to refine the biopsy indication and to avoid for several patients without Pca the unnecessary cost and the complications of prostate biopsy.

Androgen ablation therapy for prostate carcinoma suppresses the immunoreactive telomerase subunit hTERT

BACKGROUND

Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein complex that protects the ends of chromosomes from degradation. Its catalytic subunit, hTERT, controls its activity. Prior data in prostate carcinoma cases indicated that immunohistochemical hTERT reactivity increases with tumor grade and may be absent in lower grade cases. The effect of complete androgen ablation (CAA) on tumor hTERT expression was uncertain.

METHODS

hTERT immunostaining was performed on the cancerous pretreatment biopsy tissue of 30 men who consecutively underwent CAA with bicalutamide and goserelin acetate for 30 days prior to undergoing radical prostatectomy, and on their tumor tissue from radical prostatectomy. As controls, biopsy and prostatectomy samples from 30 untreated men were studied. Nuclear staining was evaluated by two observers, and the change in staining between biopsy and prostatectomy samples was evaluated using the Student t test in both groups.

RESULTS

The percent of reactive tumor nuclei in treated men declined from 36.7% to 13.2% (P = 0.0001), and declined from 19.8% to 16.1% in untreated men (P = 0.4). The greater mean hTERT reactivity in the treated men's biopsy specimens was attributed to an increased proportion of higher (Gleason score > or = 7) grade tumors. The decline in hTERT immunostaining remained significant after normalizing it to that of the untreated group (P = 0.002). The original Gleason scores, corresponding declines in the percentage of reactive tumor nuclei, and significance were: Gleason score < or = 6: 11% (P = 0.03); Gleason score of 7: 23% (P < 0.006); and Gleason score > or = 8: 46% (P < 0.005) (from a mean 63% to 17%).

CONCLUSIONS

CAA for prostate carcinoma can be considered an antitelomerase therapy. The steepest reduction in telomerase activity was noted in the highest grade tumors.

Analysis of telomerase activity and detection of its catalytic subunit, hTERT

The discovery of the enzyme telomerase and its subunits has led to major advances in understanding the mechanisms of cellular proliferation, immortalization, aging, and neoplastic transformation. The expression of telomerase in more than 85% of tumors provides an excellent tool for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancer. However, the techniques employed in its detection appear to play a significant role in the interpretation of the results. The telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP assay) has been the standard assay in the detection of telomerase activity and many variations of this technique have been reported. Recent advances in the development of the TRAP assay and the incorporation of techniques that provide a quantitative and qualitative estimate of telomerase activity are assessed in this review. In addition to histological and cytological examination of tissues, distribution patterns of the catalytic subunit of telomerase, hTERT, are frequently used in the prognosis of tumors. The methods involved in the detection of hTERT as a biomarker of cellular transformation are also analyzed.

Telomerase reverse transcriptase subunit immunoreactivity: a marker for high-grade prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein complex that maintains telomeric DNA, has been detected in 67-93% of prostate carcinomas by telomeric repeat-amplification protocol assay (involving polymerase chain reaction). One study used in situ hybridization in nine patients; however, to date, no immunohistochemical results have been published.

METHODS

From two hospitals, the authors compiled data on 62 patients who underwent prostatectomy from January 1996 to May 2001. Representative tissue sections were immunostained with a polyclonal antibody to telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), the catalytic subunit of telomerase. Staining was evaluated by two observers and was correlated with grade, stage, and biochemical failure. There were 28 sections from low-grade to intermediate-grade tumors (Gleason score, 3-6), 14 sections with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7, 9 sections with a Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7, and 11 sections from high-grade tumors (Gleason score, 8-10).

RESULTS

From low-grade to high-grade tumors, the four groups described above disclosed nuclear reactivity in 64%, 100%, 100%, and 100% of sections, respectively. Mean percentages of 5%, 15%, 40%, and 51% of nuclei were reactive in the respective groups (P < 0.0001) with intratumoral heterogeneity. The percent of reactive tumor nuclei was not correlated with pathologic stage (P = 0.32) or margin status (P = 0.35). The basal cell layer in sections of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and benign/atrophic acini was reactive; secretory cells were reactive in 13 of 34 HGPIN foci (38%) in 1-20% of nuclei and were never reactive in benign acini. Lymphocytes and skeletal muscle were reactive. Weak, nonspecific, cytoplasmic staining was noted in benign and tumor acini.

CONCLUSIONS

Like cytokeratin 34betaE12, nuclear anti-TERT reactivity is a basal cell marker in nonneoplastic prostatic acini. Anti-TERT reactivity is acquired by secretory cells in tumorigenesis, but consistent reactivity is restricted to high-grade carcinoma (Gleason primary pattern >or=4). This histologic evidence suggests that higher grade tumors have maximally activated telomerase and may be most responsive to antitelomerase therapy.

Evaluation of PCR-ELISA for determination of telomerase activity in prostate needle biopsy and prostatic fluid specimens

The conventional TRAP assay will determine telomerase activity in tissue or other specimens. However, methodological disadvantages limit its clinical use. We evaluated a modified TRAP assay, the telomerase PCR-ELISA, as a practical clinical system for measuring its activity in conjunction with prostate cancer (PCa). We examined telomerase activity by both TRAP and PCR-ELISA assays in 48 sextant needle biopsy (SNB) specimens from dye-marked areas of the prostate glands of 7 PCa patients. Each specimen was histologically confirmed as cancerous or cancer-free by examining a paired specimen taken from the same marked area. In addition, prostatic fluid (PF) specimens were analyzed from 18 patients, 9 of whom were diagnosed with PCa while 9 were diagnosed as cancer-free but mostly with BPH. The results on individual SNB specimens matched well for the two methods. The sensitivity (91%) and specificity (69%) for the PCR-ELISA measurements were consistent with those for the conventional TRAP assay, 88% and 81%, respectively. Quantitatively, with the PCR-ELISA assay, the mean telomerase activity (24.5+/-28.4 units) per needle core with PCa cells was significantly higher than that in needle cores without PCa cells (7.2+/-2.2 unit), as it was with the conventional TRAP assay, namely 25.6+/-27.8 units and 7.3+/-1.8 units, respectively. In PF specimens from PCa patients, which had a lower mean telomerase than was found in needle cores containing PCa cells (7.1+/-1.5 units in the PCR-ELISA, 7.2+/-1.8 units in the conventional TRAP assay), statistical analysis showed good matching between the results from the two assays, overall. In conclusion, the PCR-ELISA can be considered a reliable method to determine telomerase activity as an adjunct in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.