Validation of a single survey that can be used for case identification and assessment of asthma control: the Breathmobile Program

Parent Perceptions of a Validated Asthma Questionnaire in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE

While a number asthma questionnaires have been validated, most have not been used in an emergency department (ED) setting, nor evaluated patient feedback or clinical benefit. We sought to evaluate parent feedback on an asthma questionnaire used in an ED setting.

METHODS

We recruited parents of children 2-17 years old presenting to a tertiary pediatric ED for asthma care. Parents first completed then rated the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI-ED).

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-four parents (84%) completed surveys. Approximately two-thirds were Latinx, and 82% completed high school. Ninety-three percent of children had uncontrolled asthma. Parents endorsed the PACCI-ED: as easy to answer (94%); useful in understanding their child's asthma (83%); used the right words to describe their child's condition (95%); and would help the ED physician (93%) and primary care provider (PCP) (89%) better understand their child's asthma. Eleven percent reported that the PACCI-ED interfered with ED care. Parents with lower health literacy were more likely to agree the PACCI-ED asked more complete questions about their child's asthma than the ED physician (64% vs 45%, P = .02). Parents of children with uncontrolled asthma were more likely to agree that the PACCI-ED should become part of regular ED care (88% vs 62%, P = .02). Parents were more likely to agree that the PACCI-ED would help their PCP understand their child's asthma if they had a lower income (92% vs 50%, P < .001), less education (100% vs 88%, P = .004), were Latinx (94% vs 83%, P = .006), or were not using controller medication (93% vs 83%, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Parents endorse an asthma questionnaire as valuable during an ED encounter. Because it is endorsed to be valuable to parents, this questionnaire could be used to facilitate patient-centered asthma care.

Parent-Centered Perspectives on a Validated Asthma Questionnaire in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE

Although national asthma guidelines recommend use of validated questionnaires to improve asthma care, little is known about the extent to which these questionnaires are patient-centered. This qualitative study evaluated parent perceptions of a validated asthma questionnaire.

METHODS

We administered the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument for the Emergency Department (PACCI-ED) to parents of children 2 to 17 years old presenting to a large urban pediatric ED for asthma care and assessed their perceptions of the tool's utility and acceptability via a structured interview. Responses were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a phenomenological approach.

RESULTS

Eighty-three parents participated. Qualitative analysis revealed 2 major themes (with 5 subthemes). The first major theme (and 3 subthemes) was that the PACCI-ED facilitated communication with the health care team and caregivers: improving communication 1) with ED providers, 2) in other settings such as schools, and 3) in the primary care setting where the relationship with primary care providers was felt to be variable. The second major theme (and 2 subthemes) was that the PACCI-ED increased parents' capacity to manage their child's asthma: by helping parents understand 1) what symptoms were related to asthma and 2) how those symptoms might change over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents perceive that the PACCI-ED is acceptable and useful for facilitating communication in the ED and other health care settings, and for building parent capacity to track and manage their child's asthma. A validated structured asthma questionnaire in the ED may facilitate patient-centered asthma care.

Racial Inequities in Asthma Care

Racial inequities in asthma care are evolving as a recognized factor in long-standing inequities in asthma outcomes (e.g., hospitalization and mortality). Little research has been conducted regarding the presence or absence of racial inequities among patients seen in asthma specialist settings, this is an important area of future research given that asthma specialist care is recommended for patients experiencing the poor asthma outcomes disproportionately experienced by Black and Hispanic patients. This study provides a systematic review of racial asthma care inequities in asthma epidemiology, clinical assessment, medication prescription, and asthma specialist referral practices.

What Parents Want Doctors to Know: Responses to an Open-Ended Item on an Asthma Questionnaire

OBJECTIVE

Unstructured parental comments could solicit important information about children's asthma, yet are rarely captured in clinical asthma questionnaires. This mixed-methods study describes parents' written responses to an open-ended question in a validated asthma questionnaire.

METHODS

The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI) asthma questionnaire was administered to parents of children with asthma symptoms presenting to 48 pediatric primary care offices (PPCP), 1 pediatric pulmonology office, and 1 emergency department (ED). Responses to the question, "Please write down any concern or anything else you would like your doctor to know about your child's asthma" were analyzed using a phenomenological approach until thematic saturation was achieved for each site. Logistic regressions tested whether sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were associated with responding to the open-ended question.

RESULTS

Of 7,988 parents who completed the PACCI, 954 (12%) responded to the open-ended question-2% in PPCP, 31% in the ED, and 50% in the pulmonary setting. More severe asthma was associated with higher odds of responding (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.84). Based on responses provided, we identified 3 communication types: 1) clarifying symptoms, 2) asking questions, and 3) communicating distress. Responses also covered 5 asthma-related themes: 1) diagnostic uncertainty, 2) understanding asthma etiology and prognosis, 3) medication management, 4) impact on child function, and 5) personal asthma characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Parents of children with severe asthma provided clarifying details, asked questions, and relayed health concerns and distress. None of these topics may be easily captured by closed-ended asthma questionnaires.

Children with under-diagnosed asthma presenting to a pediatric emergency department

BACKGROUND

Undiagnosed asthma in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) for respiratory illnesses might be associated with subsequent asthma morbidity and repeat ED visits.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence of undiagnosed asthma among children presenting for ED care, and explore associations with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We surveyed parents of children ages 2-17 years seeking ED care for respiratory symptoms (including asthma) regarding sociodemographic characteristics, asthma symptoms, prior asthma care and morbidity, and prior asthma diagnosis. Undiagnosed asthma was defined as a positive screening for asthma and no prior diagnosis. We compared sociodemographic and clinical factors of those with diagnosed versus undiagnosed asthma using chi-square, t-tests and multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Of 362 children, 36% had undiagnosed asthma. Undiagnosed children were younger, had younger parents, and had parents less likely to speak English versus diagnosed children (all p < 0.05). Among undiagnosed children, 42% had moderate or severe asthma and 66% reported ≥1 exacerbation in the prior 12 months. Parent-reported controller medication use was higher among diagnosed versus undiagnosed children (60% vs. 21%, p=.001). In a multivariable logistic regression (adjusting for insurance, education, income and preferred language), no controller usage (aOR 4.26), no asthma exacerbations in the prior year (aOR 2.41) and younger age (aOR 0.76) were significantly associated with undiagnosed asthma.

CONCLUSION

Children presenting to the ED with undiagnosed asthma commonly experience significant prior asthma morbidity. Strategies to improve asthma diagnosis and messaging to their parents may reduce future morbidity.

Inhaled corticosteroid beliefs, complementary and alternative medicine in children presenting to the emergency department for asthma

OBJECTIVE

Negative beliefs about inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and endorsement of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) have been associated with medication non-adherence and uncontrolled asthma. The association of CAM and negative health beliefs is not described in children in acute care settings. Our study objective is to determine the relationship between negative ICS beliefs, CAM use and poorly controlled asthma among a predominantly Latino population in an acute care setting.

METHODS

The study was conducted in the pediatric emergency department of a children's hospital. During an ED asthma encounter, validated questionnaires surveyed parents about negative ICS beliefs, CAM use, and asthma health and control. We compared asthma health reports between parents who did or did not endorse negative ICS beliefs or CAM use, by chi-squared test (or a Fisher's exact test where appropriate).

RESULTS

Parents of 174 children identified mostly as Latino with Medicaid insurance and high asthma morbidity. CAM endorsement and negative ICS beliefs were both associated with increased use of lifetime glucocorticoid (p = 0.03 and p=0.01 respectively). While CAM endorsement was associated with less hospitalizations (p = 0.04) and parental report of asthma "getting better" (p = 0.01), CAM users reported trouble with paying for rent or food (p = 0.02). Negative ICS beliefs and CAM endorsement were not associated with medication adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative ICS beliefs are associated with higher number of oral glucocorticoid courses. The association between CAM endorsement and asthma control is varied, but mostly in favor of improved control. Financial difficulties may make CAM use more likely.

Parental perception of a picture-based chronic asthma care management tool in an urban pediatric emergency department

BACKGROUND

National asthma guidelines recommend use of an asthma action plan (AAP) as part of chronic asthma care. Unfortunately, AAPs have not been tailored for use in acute care settings, where many patients at risk for poor chronic asthma care are seen, including those who are non-English-speaking or have low literacy levels. We previously developed a picture-based medication plan (PBMP), a unique type of AAP for use in an ambulatory setting and designed to increase patient use and understanding. However, little is known about how parents seeking emergency department (ED) asthma care would perceive the PBMP.

OBJECTIVE

To assess parental attitudes toward an asthma PBMP in the largest pediatric ED in Los Angeles County.

METHODS

We surveyed a consecutive sample of English- or Spanish-speaking parents of children 2-17 years seeking ED asthma care. Parents used a 5-point Likert scale for various statements regarding their perceptions of the PBMP. Responses were analyzed by sociodemographics, asthma control, and health literacy using Chi-squared and t-tests.

RESULTS

90 parents provided feedback on the PBMP. The majority of parents endorsed the PBMP. Endorsement was 20%-30% higher among Spanish-speaking parents and those who did not complete high-school compared to English-speaking parents and parents with a high school education or higher (p < 0.05 for both comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Spanish-speaking parents and parents with less than a high-school education overwhelmingly endorsed the PBMP. It may be useful to consider incorporating the PBMP as part of patient-centered chronic asthma care strategies for populations seen in ED settings.

Asthma specialist care preferences among parents of children receiving emergency department care for asthma

Objective: To learn factors associated with desire for asthma specialist care among parents of children seeking emergency department (ED) care for asthma, and if referral was indicated based on national asthma guidelines. Methods: We surveyed parents of children ages 0-18 years seeking pediatric ED asthma care, then comparisons were made according to parental level of interest in asthma specialist care, with regard to socio-demographics, asthma morbidity and care, by chi-squared and logistic regression. Results: Of 149 children, 20% reported specialist care, but 75% met guideline criteria for referral. About 80% of parents not seeing an asthma specialist expressed a desire to see one. Higher rates of prior urgent care visits (48% vs. 22%, p = 0.03), ED visits (82% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and oral steroid use (53% vs. 22%, p = 0.009) were reported by parents who desired an asthma specialist compared with parents who did not. 87% of parents not seeing a specialist attributed this to a perceived lack of necessity by their primary care provider. An ED visit within the prior 12 months was the most significant predictor in parental desire for specialist care (odds ratio 9.75; 95% CI 3.42-27.76) in adjusted logistic regression models. Conclusion: High rates of parental preference for asthma specialist care suggest that directly querying parents may be an efficient method to identify children appropriate for specialist care in the ED.

Predictors of prior asthma specialist care among pediatric patients seen in the emergency department for asthma

Background: Asthma guidelines recommend specialist care for patients experiencing poor asthma outcomes during emergency department (ED) visits. The prevalence and predictors of asthma specialist care among an ED population seeking pediatric asthma care are unknown. Objective: To examine, in an ED population, factors associated with prior asthma specialist use based on parental reports of prior asthma morbidity and asthma care. Methods: Parents of children ages 0 to 17 years seeking ED asthma care were surveyed regarding socio-demographics, asthma morbidity, asthma management and current asthma specialist care status. We compared prior asthma care and morbidity between those currently cared for by an asthma specialist versus not. Multivariable logistic regression models to predict factors associated with asthma specialist use were adjusted for parent education and insurance type. Results: Of 150 children (62% boys, mean age 4.7 years, 69% Hispanic), 22% reported asthma specialist care, 75% did not see a specialist and for 3% specialist status was unknown. Care was worse for those not seeing a specialist, including under-use of controller medications (24% vs. 64%, p < 0.001) and asthma action plans (20% vs. 62%, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that lack of recommendation by the primary care physician reduced the odds of specialist care (OR 0.01, 95% CI <0.01, 0.05, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Asthma specialist care was infrequent among this pediatric ED population, consistent with the sub-optimal chronic asthma care we observed. Prospective trials should further investigate if systematic referral to asthma specialists during/after an ED encounter would improve asthma outcomes.

Asthma interventions in primary schools--a review

OBJECTIVE

To explore, in depth, the literature for evidence supporting asthma interventions delivered within primary schools and to identify any "gaps" in this research area.

METHODS

A literature search using electronic search engines (i.e. Medline, PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase and Informit) and the search terms "asthma", "asthma intervention" and "school-based asthma education program" (and derivatives of these keywords) was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria; of these eight were Randomised Controlled Trials. There was much variety in the type, content, delivery and outcome measures in these 23 studies. The most common intervention type was asthma education delivery. Most studies demonstrated improvement in clinical and humanistic markers, for example, asthma symptoms medication use (decrease in reliever medication use or decrease in the need for rescue oral steroid), inhaler use technique and spacer use competency, lung function and quality of life. Relatively few studies explored the effect of the intervention on academic outcomes. Most studies did not report on the sustainability or cost effectiveness of the intervention tested. Another drawback in the literature was the lack of details about the intervention and inconsistency in instruments selected for measuring outcomes.

CONCLUSION

School-based asthma interventions regardless of their heterogeneity have positive clinical, humanistic, health economical and academic outcomes.

The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument asthma questionnaire: for use in diverse children of all ages

BACKGROUND

National Institutes of Health asthma guidelines recommend questionnaires to assess asthma control, but these questionnaires are not useable across the entire pediatric age spectrum and have not been validated among significant numbers of minority or Spanish-speaking children.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate a questionnaire designed to assess asthma control across a broad age range of minority and Spanish-speaking children cared for in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

Between July 1, 2007, and September 30, 2010, we collected information using the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI), the Asthma Control Test (ACT; or the childhood ACT for children 4-11 years old), the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Quality of Life Questionnaire, and lung function and clinicians' ratings of asthma status among a population of children presenting for routine asthma specialist care. The PACCI measure of asthma control was validated by evaluating accuracy, internal reliability, and concurrent, discriminative, and known-groups validity.

RESULTS

We collected information on 265 English- and 52 Spanish-speaking children (mean age, 8.2 years; 58% male; 44% African American). Across all age groups and in both languages, PACCI control showed good internal reliability and strong concurrent, discriminative, and known-groups validity with ACT and Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Quality of Life Questionnaire scores and clinicians' ratings of asthma control. The accuracy of the PACCI in classifying children with uncontrolled asthma was good (area under the curve, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

The PACCI accurately measures asthma control in English- and Spanish-speaking children. The PACCI should be useful to clinicians to assess and classify asthma according to National Institutes of Health asthma guidelines.

Asthma outcomes: composite scores of asthma control

BACKGROUND

Current asthma guidelines recommend assessing the level of a patient's asthma control. Consequently, there is increasing use of asthma control as an outcome measure in clinical research studies. Several composite assessment instruments have been developed to measure asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

National Institutes of Health institutes and federal agencies convened an expert group to propose the most appropriate standardized composite score of asthma control instruments to be used in future asthma studies.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed using both the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings and key terms to identify studies that attempted to develop and/or test composite score instruments for asthma control. We classified instruments as core (required in future studies), supplemental (used according to study aims and standardized), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at a National Institutes of Health-organized workshop convened in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011.

RESULTS

We identified 17 composite score instruments with published validation information; all had comparable content. Eight instruments demonstrated responsiveness over time; 3 demonstrated responsiveness to treatment. A minimal clinically important difference has been established for 3 instruments. The instruments have demographic limitations; some are proprietary, and their use could be limited by cost.

CONCLUSION

Two asthma composite score instruments are sufficiently validated for use in adult populations, but additional research is necessary to validate their use in nonwhite populations. Gaps also exist in validating instruments for pediatric populations.

Assessing asthma control in UK primary care: use of routinely collected prospective observational consultation data to determine appropriateness of a variety of control assessment models

BACKGROUND

Assessing asthma control using standardised questionnaires is recommended as good clinical practice but there is little evidence validating their use within primary care. There is however, strong empirical evidence to indicate that age, weight, gender, smoking, symptom pattern, medication use, health service resource use, geographical location, deprivation, and organisational issues, are factors strongly associated with asthma control. A good control measure is therefore one whose variation is most explained by these factors.

METHOD

Eight binary (Yes = poor control, No = good control) models of asthma control were constructed from a large UK primary care dataset: the Royal College of Physicians 3-Questions (RCP-3Qs); the Jones Morbidity Index; three composite measures; three single component models. Accounting for practice clustering of patients, we investigated the effects of each model for assessing control. The binary models were assessed for goodness-of-fit statistics using Pseudo R-squared and Akaikes Information Criteria (AIC), and for performance using Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic (AUROC). In addition, an expanded RCP-3Q control scale (0-9) was derived and assessed with linear modelling. The analysis identified which model was best explained by the independent variables and thus could be considered a good model of control assessment.

RESULTS

1,205 practices provided information on 64,929 patients aged 13+ years. The RCP-3Q model provided the best fit statistically, with a Pseudo R-squared of 18%, and an AUROC of 0.79. By contrast, the composite model based on the GINA definition of controlled asthma had a higher AIC, an AUROC of 0.72, and only 10% variability explained. In addition, although the Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) model had the lowest AIC, it had an AUROC of 71% and only 6% of variability explained. However, compared with the RCP-3Qs binary model, the linear RCP-3Q Total Score Model (Scale 0-9), was found to be a more robust 'tool' for assessing asthma control with a lower AIC (28,6163) and an R-squared of 33%.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of a gold standard for assessing asthma control in primary care, the results indicate that the RCP-3Qs is an effective control assessment tool but, for maximum effect, the expanded scoring model should be used.

A comparison of asthma prevalence and morbidity between rural and urban schoolchildren in Arkansas

BACKGROUND

Asthma disproportionately affects minority and low-income children. Investigations that focus on high-risk pediatric populations outside the inner city are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare asthma prevalence and morbidity in urban and rural children in Arkansas.

METHODS

We administered a validated survey to parents of children enrolled in urban and rural school districts in Arkansas. Rates of asthma diagnosis, asthma symptoms, medication use, and health care utilization were compared between urban and rural groups.

RESULTS

Age and sex distributions were similar; however, 85% of rural and 67% of urban children were black and 78% of rural and 37% of urban children had state-issued medical insurance (P < .001 for both). Provider-diagnosed asthma was similar in the rural vs urban groups (19% vs 20%); however, rural children were more commonly diagnosed as having chronic bronchitis (7% vs. 2%, P < .001). Rural children had more asthma morbidity compared with urban children, including recurrent trouble breathing (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.2), recurrent cough (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.9-2.6), recurrent chest tightness (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.2), and repeated episodes of bronchitis (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.7-2.8) during the preceding 2 years. Rural children were more likely to report symptoms consistent with moderate to severe asthma compared with urban children (46% vs. 35%, P < .001). There were no differences in health care utilization between groups.

CONCLUSION

Asthma prevalence was similar between representative rural and urban groups in Arkansas, but asthma morbidity was significantly higher in the rural group.

Identifying preschool children with asthma in Orange County

Airway changes related to childhood asthma occur early in the disease process. This pilot study focuses on the validation of the Breathmobile Case Identification Survey (BCIS) in preschool-age children in Orange County, CA. Fifty-two children from low-income Spanish-speaking families participated in the study. Thirteen children were identified as possibly having asthma from the survey results compared with 20 children diagnosed by an asthma specialist. We found that the complete seven-question survey had a sensitivity of 0.65 and a specificity of 0.94. An abbreviated three-question version had a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.84. Our data suggest that the abbreviated BCIS, which is simple and easily analyzed, may be a useful tool in identifying young children who are at risk for asthma and need further evaluation and appropriate therapy.

Underdiagnosed and uncontrolled asthma: findings in rural schoolchildren from the Delta region of Arkansas

BACKGROUND

Studies of asthma in school-aged rural children in the United States are limited, and there are no studies of high-risk pediatric populations in rural environments.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prevalence of asthma and to evaluate markers of morbidity in 2 rural school districts in the Arkansas Delta region.

METHODS

Children at risk for asthma were identified by using a cross-sectional asthma case-finding survey. Surveys were distributed to students enrolled in the Marvell and Eudora school districts during the 2005-2006 school year.

RESULTS

The response rate was 81% (964 of 1,190). The mean age of the 964 children who completed the survey was 10.3 years (age range, 4-17 years); 85% were African American, and 78% had state-issued insurance. Twenty-eight percent (268 of 964) of the children were categorized as being at risk for asthma by previous physician diagnosis (33%), algorithm diagnosis (16%), or both (51%). Of the 268 at-risk children, 79% reported persistent symptoms and 21% reported intermittent or no current symptoms. In the previous 4 weeks, 59% of the children experienced daytime and nocturnal symptoms and 62% used rescue medications. Activity limitation and treatment in the emergency department or hospitalization for asthma in the previous 2 years were reported by 82% and 49% of the children, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Active asthma symptoms are prevalent in this predominantly minority, low-income, rural population. High rates of undiagnosed and uncontrolled asthma are suggested by frequent asthma symptoms, activity limitation, rescue medication use, and emergency health care utilization. Future studies of pediatric asthma should focus on high-risk populations in rural locales.