The effect of low-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic patients and comparison with oral zafirlukast

Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover, Clinical-End-Point Pilot Study to Examine the Use of Exhaled Nitric Oxide as a Bioassay for Dose Separation of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate

This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover, clinical-end-point pilot study examining the hypothesis that inhaled fluticasone propionate decreases exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) concentrations within a week of beginning treatment and shows evidence of dose separation across the marketed dose range. Subjects had a ≥6-month history of asthma and screening eNO ≥60 parts per billion. At the start of each treatment period, eNO was ≥55 parts per billion, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second was ≥50% predicted. Subjects attended a clinic visit daily on consecutive mornings during each of 3 1-week treatment periods to measure eNO and receive once-daily doses of 100/50, 250/50, or 500/50 fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination product (Advair^® Diskus). Daily eNO value recorded was the highest of 3 measurements; 1 inhalation of treatment was then administered. Procedures were repeated for 3 treatment cycles, separated by 14-day minimum washouts. A total of 105 subjects were screened; 22 were randomized; and 17 completed all treatments. Mean percentage eNO decrease (standard deviation) from day 1 baseline for each treatment period was 36.6 (±18.7), 45.3 (±16.5), and 54.6 (±12.5) with Advair^® 100/50, 250/50, and 500/50, respectively. Mean percentage decrease in eNO across each treatment (dose) was modeled using a mixed-model ANOVA. Although the overall treatment was significant (P = .0015), because of the relatively small sample size and within-subject variability, only the 100/50 vs 500/50 (P = .0003) and 250/50 vs 500/50 (P = .047) treatments were significantly different.

Effect of fluticasone on markers of inflammation and quality of life in steroid-naive patients with mild asthma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with mild asthma may adapt to symptoms that may be neglected at a medical consultation. Despite active airway inflammation, indicating need for treatment symptoms may be poorly perceived and influence on quality of life. The aim was to find out if markers of asthma activity and quality of life are influenced by inhaled steroids in patients who regard themselves as free of symptoms.

METHODS

Seventy steroid-free patients with mild asthma were treated with inhaled fluticasone (250 microg twice daily) or placebo for 3 months in a randomised, double-blind, study. Spirometry with reversibility test, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and eucapnic dry air hyperventilation and quality of life [(Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)] were assessed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Fluticasone, but not placebo, decreased methacholine responsiveness. Bronchial responsiveness to dry air and exhaled NO levels was significantly lowered by fluticasone compared with placebo. Quality-of-life scores were high already before treatment and were not significantly altered by treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with an inhaled steroid in mild asthmatics altered bronchial responsiveness and exhaled NO levels but did not improve quality of life. In mild asthma, there is thus a space for improvement with regard to inflammatory parameters in patients who have only minor symptoms that are not influenced by treatment. In a long-term perspective, the indication for treatment of surrogate markers remains, however, unclear.

Fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (January 2008), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and risk of bias.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, recruiting 16,160 participants. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.1 to 0.43 litres); morning PEF (between 23 and 46 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.44 and 0.7); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1 and 1.4 puffs/day). High dose FP increased the number of patients who could withdraw from prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/day Peto Odds Ratio 14.07 (95% CI 7.17 to 27.57). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Doses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/day are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.

Rapid effect of inhaled ciclesonide in asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma, and it is important to measure the onset of effect of this therapy on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and levels of eosinophils in induced sputum.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, 21 patients with mild asthma inhaled ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator) qd, ciclesonide 640 microg (ex-actuator) bid, and placebo for 7 days. Exhaled NO and AHR to adenosine monophosphate (AMP), measured as the provocative concentration of AMP producing a 20% reduction in FEV1 (PC20FEV1), were assessed after inhalation on days 1, 3 and 7. Eosinophil levels in induced sputum were also measured.

RESULTS

Ciclesonide 320 microg qd and 640 microg bid produced significantly greater improvements in PC20FEV1 compared with placebo on day 1 (within 2.5 h), and on days 3 and 7 (all p < 0.0001). On day 3, both ciclesonide doses significantly reduced exhaled NO levels by - 17.7 parts per billion (p < 0.0001) and - 15.4 parts per billion (p < 0.003) vs placebo, respectively. Significant reductions were maintained during the study with both ciclesonide doses (p < 0.01). A nonsignificant trend towards a decrease in eosinophil cell numbers was observed after 7 days of ciclesonide treatment, especially in patients receiving the higher dose.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of ciclesonide decreased AHR to AMP and exhaled NO within 3 h, while FEV, improved at 3 days and 7 days.

Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler: a once-daily inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Mometasone furoate (MF), a potent synthetic inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with a high affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor, is approved for use in the treatment of asthma.

SCOPE

Publications reviewed in this article were identified via searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using the terms 'mometasone furoate AND pharmacology' and 'mometasone furoate AND asthma AND clinical trial'. Data from abstracts presented at respiratory society meetings, and relevant background information, are also reviewed.

FINDINGS

In clinical studies, MF, administered by dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI), was effective in treating all severities of persistent asthma, improving pulmonary function, reducing asthma symptoms, and reducing or eliminating the need for oral corticosteroids. Once-daily dosing of MF-DPI was effective in patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma previously taking twice-daily regimens of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and in patients taking only inhaled beta2-agonists for symptom relief. Once-daily dosing in the evening with MF-DPI 200 microg conferred a greater benefit than morning dosing with MF-DPI 200 microg. Patients with severe asthma who were dependent on oral corticosteroids (OCSs) and high doses of ICSs were able to achieve greater asthma control and reduce or even eliminate OCSs when switched to MF-DPI. In trials of up to 1 year in duration, MF-DPI was well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events considered mild or moderate in intensity. MF had low systemic bioavailability and no clinically significant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis suppression at therapeutic doses. The DPI device is a multiple-dose inhaler with a counter containing agglomerates of MF and lactose. Patients of all severities of persistent asthma were able to generate and maintain airflow profiles necessary to provide a uniform and accurate dose.

LIMITATIONS

Only one study evaluated both morning and evening administration of once-daily doses, and one of the comparative clinical trials was an open-label study.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily administration of MF-DPI 200-400 microg in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma effectively improved lung function and asthma control. In patients with severe persistent asthma dependent on oral corticosteroids, treatment with MF-DPI 400 microg BID permitted substantial reduction of oral corticosteroid use. All MF-DPI treatments were well tolerated and had minimal systemic effects.

Fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.2. To explore the presence of a dose-response effect.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (January 2005), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan 4.2

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-five studies met the inclusion criteria (14,208 participants). Methodological quality was high. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.13 to 0.45 litres); morning PEF (between 23 and 47 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.5 and 0.85); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1.2 and 2.2 puffs/day). High dose FP increased the number of patients who could withdraw from prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/day Peto Odds Ratio 14.07 (95% CI 7.17 to 27.57). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis. Twenty-one patients would need to be treated for one extra to develop Candidiasis (FP 500 mcg/day), whilst only three or four patients need to be treated to avoid one extra patient being withdrawn due to lack of efficacy at all doses of FP.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Doses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/day are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.

Comparative effect of triamcinolone, nedocromil and montelukast on asthma control in children: A randomized pragmatic study

Asthma severity can be judged by measurements of symptoms, lung function, and medication requirements. The objective was to compare the effect of a 4-wk monotherapy with low-dose triamcinolone, montelukast and nedocromil on asthma control, lung function, eosinophil blood count, and bronchial hyper-reactivity in children with mild to moderate asthma allergic to dust mite. Two hundred fifty-six children, aged 6-18 yr, with mild to moderate asthma, participated in an 8-wk study. This was a three-arm, randomized no blinding or placebo pragmatic trial comparing the effect of triamcinolone acetonide (400 microg/day), inhaled nedocromil and montelukast sodium on clinical parameters of asthma [score, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))], PC20H, and eosinophil blood count. Two hundred forty-six children completed the study. After 4 wk of treatment with triamcinolone and montelukast, FEV(1) and PC20H significantly increased, and mean total symptoms score and mean number of eosinophil count in serum significantly decreased. Triamcinolone had a stronger effect on PC20H than montelukast. Nedocromil improved total asthma symptoms score and lung function. There was a reduction in the daytime and night-time symptom scores after treatment with all three drugs. Triamcinolone and montelukast had a stronger effect on asthma symptoms than nedocromil. There were statistically significant differences in reduction of nocturnal asthma symptoms between the triamcinolone and nedocromil groups (p < 0.001) and between montelukast and nedocromil (p = 0.001) groups, but not between the triamcinolone and montelukast groups. There was a reduction in beta-agonists use after treatment with all three drugs, with the strongest effect of triamcinolone. The study showed the strongest effect of low-dose inhaled steroids on clinical symptoms, lung function, bronchial hyper-reactivity and eosinophil blood count when compared to other asthma medications.

Comparison of glucocorticoid and cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist treatments in an experimental model of chronic airway inflammation in guinea-pigs

BACKGROUND

Leukotriene receptor antagonists have been demonstrated in several studies to possess bronchodilating and anti-inflammatory properties in asthma. However, there are few experimental studies performed to compare the effects of anti-leukotrienes and glucocorticoids, most used anti-inflammatory agents in asthma. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of treatment with dexamethasone or montelukast on eosinophil and mononuclear cell recruitment in an experimental model of allergen-induced chronic airway inflammation in guinea-pigs (GP).

METHODS

GP were submitted to increasing concentrations of aerosols of ovalbumin (OVA) twice a week for 4 weeks. After 2 weeks, animals were treated daily with dexamethasone, montelukast or saline solution. After this period, GP were anaesthetized, tracheostomized, mechanically ventilated and challenged with OVA aerosol.

RESULTS

Maximal changes of respiratory system resistance and elastance induced by OVA challenge were attenuated by dexamethasone (P<0.001), but not by montelukast treatment. Neither dexamethasone nor montelukast significantly influenced bronchial oedema formation. Dexamethasone but not montelukast induced a decrease in mononuclear cells in airways (P<0.001). Eosinophil infiltration in the bronchial wall was reduced by both dexamethasone and montelukast (P<0.005). Only dexamethasone treatment reduced the levels of exhaled nitric oxide (P<0.025).

CONCLUSION

Although leukotriene receptor antagonist treatment reduces eosinophil accumulation induced by multiple antigen challenges, glucocorticoid treatment attenuates both eosinophil and mononuclear cell infiltration.

Effect of montelukast pretreatment on inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression in the lungs of antigen-challenged allergic mice

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence suggests that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is the main source of the high output of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in asthma. Treatment of asthmatic patients with glucocorticoids reduces high levels of exhaled NO mainly by inhibiting the transcription of iNOS. A similar reduction in exhaled NO was recently observed in patients treated with the leukotriene receptor antagonists, but the exact interaction between these drugs and iNOS remains obscure.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, on the expression and activity of iNOS in a murine model of allergic asthma.

METHODS

Twenty-four BALB/c mice were sensitized to OVA and were equally divided into 3 groups (Groups 1-3). Eight additional mice were sham sensitized and served as a negative control group (Group 4). Group 1 received montelukast 1 mg/kg/day in their drinking water, Group 2 received dexamethasone 1 mg/kg/day in their drinking water and Groups 3 and 4 received plain tap water. After 1 week, the animals were challenged by inhalation of OVA and, 3 h later, they were killed and their lung cells were isolated by enzymatic tissue digestion. NO generation was measured by a Griess assay, and iNOS mRNA was studied by RT-PCR.

RESULTS

A significant increase in iNOS mRNA expression and in NO generation was evident after allergen challenge compared with the controls. Pretreatment with montelukast mildly decreased NO production without producing a concomitant significant decrease in iNOS mRNA expression.

CONCLUSION

Unlike pretreatment with glucocorticoids, we failed to find compelling evidence for a major role for montelukast treatment in the modulation of iNOS mRNA in a murine model of acute asthma.

Relationship among pulmonary function, bronchial reactivity, and exhaled nitric oxide in a large group of asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Bronchial reactivity and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) are not often used to monitor control and severity of asthma in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship among different physiologic measures (pulmonary function, nonspecific bronchial reactivity, and eNO) in asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, hospital-based study conducted in patients with varied asthma severity.

RESULTS

A total of 392 patients participated in the study. There was no difference in eNO levels between patients taking inhaled corticosteroids (ICS group) and patients not receiving inhaled corticosteroids (NICS group). However, the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 were significantly lower in the ICS group compared with the NICS group (mean, 83.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4%-86.0%; vs mean, 94.1%; 95% CI, 91.1%-97.1%; P = .001; and geometric mean, 0.32 mg; 95% CI, 0.23-0.45 mg; vs geometric mean, 0.58 mg; 95% CI, 0.42-0.81 mg; P = .01; respectively). Patients with more severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness had a lower percentage of predicted FEV1 values (P < .001) and levels of eNO were significantly increased with increasing bronchial hyperresponsiveness (P < .001). There was no relationship between the percentage of predicted FEV1 and eNO. Atopic patients had significantly higher eNO levels than nonatopic patients (geometric mean, 11.21 ppb; 95% CI, 10.07-12.49 ppb; vs geometric mean, 7.76 ppb; 95% CI, 6.11-9.85 ppb; P = .006; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

eNO values are not related to the degree of airway obstruction but are related to airway reactivity and atopic status independent of inhaled corticosteroid use. Higher values of eNO are seen with increased airway reactivity.

Effect of montelukast on time-course of exhaled nitric oxide in asthma: influence of LTC4 synthase A(-444)C polymorphism

Leukotrienes (LT) mediate inflammation in asthma. The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) is thought to be a sensitive and reproducible method for assessing airway inflammation in asthmatics and the anti-inflammatory effects of drugs. A number of factors are known to contribute to intrapatient variation in FE(NO) which can confound interpretation. The aims of this study were to characterize the time-course of FE(NO), determine the effect of montelukast on the time-course of FE(NO), and evaluate the influence of the LTC(4) synthase A(-444)C polymorphism on montelukast-evoked changes in FE(NO). Following a 2-week run-in, 7 males and 5 females with asthma, 10-16 years old, received 5 or 10 mg of montelukast or an identical placebo at bedtime for 7 days in double-blind, crossover fashion, followed by a 7-day washout. FE(NO)was quantified every 30 min for 3 or 6 hr at baseline and on days 1, 2, 3, and 7 of treatment. A time-averaged value for FE(NO) was calculated (FE(NO)*), and % changes in FE(NO)* relative to baseline vs. time following placebo and montelukast were compared. The genotype of the A(-444)C polymorphism was determined by PCR and RFLP. FE(NO) varied markedly as a function of time in each patient. Time-averaged values of FE(NO) (FE(NO)*) during placebo and montelukast treatment were similar. Montelukast significantly reduced the slope of the % change in FE(NO)* vs. time curve in heterozygotes (n = 4), but not in A/A homozygotes (n = 8). These data suggest that heterozygotes respond better to montelukast compared to A/A homozygotes, at least with respect to changes in FE(NO). We conclude that assessment of inflammation or the anti-inflammatory effects of drugs in asthma based on single determinations of FE(NO) can be misleading. We further conclude that the A(-444)C polymorphism in the LTC(4) synthase gene probably contributes to interpatient variability in montelukast-evoked changes in FE(NO)* and warrants further study.