Algorithm for the diagnosis and management of asthma: a practice parameter update: Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

Usefulness of simultaneous impulse oscillometry and spirometry with airway response to bronchodilator in the diagnosis of asthmatic cough

Objective: Some of the most common causes of chronic cough include cough variant asthma (CVA), bronchial asthma (BA), and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). Although there is some overlap in the etiology of these diseases, it is clinically important to attempt an early differential diagnosis due to treatment strategies and prognoses.Methods: Spirometry and impulse oscillometry (IOS) before and after bronchodilator inhalation were analyzed for clinically diagnosed CVA (cCVA, n = 203), BA (cBA, n = 222), and ACO (cACO, n = 61).Results: A significant difference in ΔFEV₁ was observed between cBA and cCVA (ΔFEV₁ improvement of 122.5 mL/5.4% and 65.7 mL/2.2%, respectively), but no difference was observed in ΔPEF, ΔV50, or ΔV25. Except for R20 (resistance at 20 Hz), significant differences between the three groups were observed in IOS. In IOS, cCVA and cBA showed comparable peripheral airway response to bronchodilator which was thought to be commensurate with changes in V50 and V25. cACO improved ΔFEV₁ improvement of 81.0 mL/6.2% and was distinguished by a downward respiratory system reactance (Xrs) waveform with a limited bronchodilator response. FEV₁/FVC, %FEV₁, and %V25 had relatively strong correlations with the three IOS parameters, X5 (reactance at 5 Hz), resonant frequency (Fres), and low-frequency reactance area (ALX), in the correlation between IOS and spirometers.Conclusion: Changes in IOS parameters were more sensitive in this study than changes in FEV₁ or the flow-volume curve. Considering the benefits and relevance of the two different tests, simultaneous IOS and spirometry testing were useful in the diagnosis of asthmatic cough.

Inhaled corticosteroids as treatment for adolescent asthma: effects on adult anxiety-related outcomes in a murine model

RATIONALE

Allergic asthma, typically controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), is the leading chronic health condition for youth under 18 years of age. During this peri-adolescent period, significant brain maturation occurs. Prior studies indicate that both chronic inflammation and corticosteroid medications increase risk for developing an internalizing disorder like anxiety.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if chronic ICS treatments exacerbate or alleviate anxiety symptoms associated with developmental allergic asthma, we used a mouse model to isolate the influence of ICS (fluticasone propionate, FLU) vs. airway inflammation (induced with house dust mite extract, HDM).

METHODS

During development, male and female BALB/cJ mice were repeatedly exposed to HDM or saline plus one of four FLU doses (none/vehicle, low, moderate, or high). In adulthood, we assessed lung inflammation, circulating and excreted corticosteroids, anxiety-like behavior, and gene expression in stress and emotion regulation brain regions.

RESULTS

FLU treatment decreased body weight and anxiety-like behavior and increased fecal corticosterone metabolite concentrations and Crhr2 gene expression in ventral hippocampus. FLU effects were only observed in saline/non-HDM-exposed mice, and the FLU doses used did not significantly decrease HDM-induced airway inflammation. Females had greater serum and fecal corticosterone concentrations, less anxiety-like behavior, and lower Crhr1 gene expression in ventral hippocampus and prefrontal cortex than males.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that steroid medications for youth with allergic asthma may not exacerbate anxiety-related symptoms, and that they should be avoided in children/adolescents without a health condition. The results are informative to future work on the use of corticosteroid medications during childhood or adolescent development.

Peri-adolescent asthma: Acute impacts on innate immune response, corticosterone, and microglia in mice

Asthma is highly comorbid with anxiety in youth. We investigated the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and microglia as mechanisms underlying asthma and anxiety comorbidity. We induced asthma symptoms in developing BALB/cJ mice with house dust mite (HDM) for airway inflammation and methacholine (MCH) for bronchoconstriction. On the last day of exposure, we analyzed samples at six timepoints. Lung IL-5 and IL-1β expression peaked 4 h after final HDM exposure. Circulating corticosterone was blunted in a sex- and treatment-specific temporal pattern. Hippocampal IL-1β expression and microglial area were marginally increased 24 h after MCH exposure. These results provide a foundation for further work investigating asthma-anxiety mechanisms.

Differential Diagnosis of Asthma

Asthma is one of the most common chronic syndromes worldwide (Moorman et al., Vital Health Stat 3(35), 2012). It is not a diagnosis but a clinical syndrome based on a constellation of signs and symptoms (Li et al., Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 81:415–420(IIa), 1998). The classic symptoms of asthma include chest tightness, wheeze, cough, and dyspnea (Moorman et al., Vital Health Stat 3(35), 2012). The term asthma encompasses a spectrum of pulmonary diseases sharing the hallmark of reversible airway obstruction and can be classified as allergic or non-allergic (Löwhagen, J Asthma. 52(6):538–44, 2015). Asthma designated allergic is due to an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated process, but as noted not all asthma is allergic in etiology (Romanet-Manent et al., Allergy 57:607–13, 2002). The differential diagnosis for asthma is broad and requires a detailed history with supportive pulmonary function tests to be properly diagnosed.

An in-depth characterization of a large cohort of adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, allergic, immune-mediated disease associated with increased risk of comorbid atopic conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To perform an in-depth characterization of a large cohort of manually verified adult patients with EoE, including evaluation of less studied associations, such as pollen food allergy syndrome, anaphylaxis, autoimmunity, and psychiatric comorbidities.

METHODS

We performed a manual retrospective electronic medical record review of 1,218 patients with EoE identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes from the University of Pennsylvania Health Systems. Through manual medical record review, we evaluated patient demographics, family and smoking history, laboratory and endoscopic findings, treatment, and comorbid atopic, autoimmune, and psychiatric conditions.

RESULTS

A total of 950 of the 1,218 patients had biopsy-proven EoE. This cohort was predominantly male, white, and never-smokers who presented most commonly with dysphagia, with an initial biopsy results showing 49 eosinophils per high-powered field, a serum absolute eosinophilic count of 446,000/µL, and mean total IgE level of 243 IU/mL. Of the patients, 55% had impaction (of which 38% required endoscopic removal), and 56% had strictures or fibrosis (of which 56% underwent dilatation). Therapy used was predominantly (77%) medical only. Comorbid atopy, pollen food allergy syndrome, drug allergy, anaphylaxis, autoimmunity, and psychiatric illnesses were higher in the EoE cohort compared with the general University of Pennsylvania Health Systems population.

CONCLUSION

Our adult cohort of manually verified, biopsy-proven EoE had an increased risk of pollen food allergy syndrome, anaphylaxis, and comorbid autoimmune and psychiatric conditions compared with the University of Pennsylvania Health Systems population. There was also an increased prevalence of impaction and stricture or fibrosis requiring endoscopic intervention compared with the pediatric population.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence of Anxiety Using the Vanderbilt ADHD Scale in a Diverse Community Outpatient Setting

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric anxiety is prevalent but frequently underdiagnosed compared with other behavioral conditions in primary care practice. Pediatricians routinely screen for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder using the Vanderbilt Rating Scale, which includes a short screen for anxiety. We sought to examine the prevalence of potential anxiety among patients whose parents originally had concerns of disruptive behavior in a diverse setting and examine differences in anxiety across ethnic groups using the Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scale (VADRS).

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional analysis of medical records data of children between the ages of 5 to 12 years whose parents had concerns of disruptive behavior and received primary care from May 25, 2010, to January 31, 2014 at 2 pediatric community health clinics in Indianapolis.

RESULTS

Sixteen percent of children whose parents had concerns for disruptive behavior screened positive for anxiety based on the VADRS screen. Hispanic parents were less likely to report symptoms of anxiety (Spanish speaking: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2-0.8; English speaking: AOR 0.3, 95% CI, 0.1-0.9) compared with white and black families.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety is detected at a lower rate among Hispanic pediatric patients using the VADRS. This may suggest differences in the performance of the VADRS among Spanish-speaking families.

The epidemiologic characteristics of healthcare provider-diagnosed eczema, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food allergy in children: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The rates of childhood allergic conditions are changing, prompting the need for continued surveillance. Examination of healthcare provider-based diagnosis data is an important and lacking methodology needed to complement existing studies that rely on participant reporting.

METHODS

Utilizing our care network of 1,050,061 urban and sub-urban children, we defined two retrospective cohorts: (1) a closed birth cohort of 29,662 children and (2) a cross-sectional cohort of 333,200 children. These cohorts were utilized to determine the epidemiologic characteristics of the conditions studied. Logistic regression was utilized to determine the extent to which food allergy was associated with respiratory allergy.

RESULTS

In our birth cohort, the peak age at diagnosis of eczema, asthma, rhinitis, and food allergy was between 0 and 5 months (7.3 %), 12 and 17 months (8.7 %), 24 and 29 months (2.5 %), and 12 and 17 months (1.9 %), respectively. In our cross-sectional cohort, eczema and rhinitis prevalence rates were 6.7 % and 19.9 %, respectively. Asthma prevalence was 21.8 %, a rate higher than previously reported. Food allergy prevalence was 6.7 %, with the most common allergenic foods being peanut (2.6 %), milk (2.2 %), egg (1.8 %), shellfish (1.5 %), and soy (0.7 %). Food allergy was associated with development of asthma (OR 2.16, 95 % CI 1.94-2.40), and rhinitis (OR 2.72, 95 % CI 2.45-3.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with previous reports, we measure lower rates of eczema and higher rates of asthma. The distribution of the major allergenic foods diverged from prior figures, and food allergy was associated with the development of respiratory allergy. The utilization of provider-based diagnosis data contributes an important and lacking methodology that complements existing studies.

Allergic Rhinitis: Mechanisms and Treatment

The prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) has been estimated at 10% to 40%, and its economic burden is substantial. AR patients develop specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody responses to indoor and outdoor environmental allergens with exposure over time. These specific IgE antibodies bind to high-affinity IgE receptors on mast cells and basophils. Key outcome measures of therapeutic interventions include rhinitis symptom control, rescue medication requirements, and quality-of-life measures. A comprehensive multiple modality treatment plan customized to the individual patient can optimize outcomes.

Targeting membrane-expressed IgE B cell receptor with an antibody to the M1 prime epitope reduces IgE production

Elevated serum levels of both total and allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) correlate with atopic diseases such as allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. Neutralization of IgE by anti-IgE antibodies can effectively treat allergic asthma. Preclinical studies indicate that targeting membrane IgE-positive cells with antibodies against M1 prime can inhibit the production of new IgE and significantly reduce the levels of serum IgE. We report results from two trials that investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of quilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting specifically the M1 prime epitope of membrane IgE, in subjects with allergic rhinitis (NCT01160861) or mild allergic asthma (NCT01196039). In both studies, quilizumab treatment was well tolerated and led to reductions in total and allergen-specific serum IgE that lasted for at least 6 months after the cessation of dosing. In subjects with allergic asthma who were subjected to an allergen challenge, quilizumab treatment blocked the generation of new IgE, reduced allergen-induced early and late asthmatic airway responses by 26 and 36%, respectively, and reduced allergen-induced increases in sputum eosinophils by ~50% compared with placebo. These studies indicate that targeting of membrane IgE-expressing cells with anti-M1 prime antibodies can prevent IgE production in humans.

Asthma: symptoms and presentation

The goal of this article is to inform readers of the common and uncommon signs and symptoms of asthma. After completion of this article, readers should have a firm understanding of the symptoms and presentation leading to a diagnosis of asthma.

Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines: 15 years of application

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), founded in 1993, embodies a network of public health organizations and medical societies, as well as other individuals concerned with asthma. Its first report, published in 1995 and entitled 'A Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention', has been widely adopted, providing the foundation for asthma guidelines in many nations across the world. To this effect, the report has not only been translated into several languages but has also been frequently updated. Since its establishment 15 years ago, GINA has undergone two major paradigm shifts. The first was the change in the late 1990s from an opinion- to an evidence-based approach for the management of asthma severity. The second, an even more radical shift, was seen in 2006, when the revised GINA guidelines involved the classification of asthma severity according to the level of control as a guide to treatment. In order to classify asthma control, elements such as the significance of the partnership between the patient and caregiver, patient education, guided self-management and treatment goals were introduced. In addition to compiling guidelines and reports for the management of asthma, GINA is actively involved in organizing and coordinating the World Asthma Day, regional initiatives and GINA symposia. On the whole, during the 15 years since their original publication in 1995, the GINA guidelines have provided the basis for many national asthma strategies around the world. This course is most likely to continue in the future. In this paper, the history of the development of the guidelines and other issues regarding the GINA project will be addressed.

History of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma: from opinion to control

The Global Initiative on Asthma (GINA) was launched in 1993 in collaboration with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institutes of Health (USA) and the WHO. Its first effort was the production of a consensus report on asthma treatment, which aimed to bridge the gap between the various treatment options and the incorporation and implementation of innovative treatment forms into daily clinical practice. The first report published in 1995, A Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, has been translated into several languages, widely adopted and provided the foundation for several asthma guidelines worldwide. The GINA and other guidelines were primarily based on consensus of expert opinion in order to employ a severity-based classification system as a guide to treatment. However, in the late 1990s, guidelines underwent a major paradigm shift from opinion- to evidence-based classification as the foundation for asthma management. A second major shift involved the classification of asthma according to the level of disease control as a guide to treatment, which was realized for the first time in the revised 2006 GINA guidelines. Since their first appearance, asthma guidelines have played a leading role in disseminating information about asthma. In addition, they have had a substantial impact on standardizing asthma care around the world, which is likely to continue in the future. This article addresses the history of guideline development and issues related to asthma guidelines, with particular emphasis on the GINA guidelines.

Control of asthma

Control is the aim of asthma management and clinical trials show that control can be achieved in the majority of patients. However, population surveys show that poorly controlled asthma still imposes a considerable burden. This fact has led to a re-evaluation of the international asthma guidelines and the updated 2006 and 2007 GINA and NAEPP guidelines suggest that the level of control should be used as the key feature for the classification and management of asthma. Furthermore, in the latest guidelines, a clearer definition of control is given and new tools for the assessment and monitoring of control are instituted. In order to achieve asthma control, not only relevant pharmacological treatment but, the establishment of a good patient-doctor relationship, proper education of the asthmatic patient, reduction of exposure to triggers and treatment of co-morbidities are pivotal issues and must be ensured.

Montelukast - evaluation in 6 to 14 years old children with persistent asthma - pediatric montelukast study group

OBJECTIVE

The suffering of children with asthma as a persistent illness is present in approximately 10% of the total population. The prevalent treatment regimens available has been the inhaled coticosteroids and short acting bronchodialators. Though the therapies are rational and well accepted but at the cost of side effects on chronic use. The changing definitions and guidelines with regard to asthma have given a classified slot to newer treatments like leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs). The aim of the present study was to study the efficacy and tolerability of montelukast in the treatment of Indian pediatric patients aged 6 to 14 years with chronic asthma.

METHODS

It was a prospective, open, non-comparative multicentric study. 881 Children (Mean age 11.83+/- 3.12 years) were included. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were given one mouth dissolving 5 mg montelukast tablet daily in the evening for 30 days.

RESULTS

There was an overall improvement in all the efficacy parameters. The daytime total asthma score decreased from 9.55 +/- 1.52 to 3.59 +/- 2.10. The average number of asthma attacks over the last 4 weeks decreased from 1.14+/- 1.19 to 0.28+/-0.57. The number of nocturnal awakenings fell from 1.54+/-0.78 to 0.43+/-0.54. FEV1 (L) [Predicted] improved by 21.18%). PEFR (L/min.) improved by 34.69%). Approximately 45% physicians rated the treatment as excellent, 30% as very good, 18% as good, 7% as fair and none as poor.

CONCLUSION

Montelukast administered once daily improved efficacy end-points and was well tolerated in pediatric patients with chronic persistent asthma establishing itself as a valuable treatment option to current asthma therapies in 6 to 14 years old patients.

[Ventilation in special situations. Mechanical ventilation in status asthmaticus]

The indications for mechanical ventilation in status asthmaticus are cardiopulmonary arrest, significant alteration of consciousness, respiratory exhaustion, and progressive respiratory insufficiency despite aggressive bronchodilator treatment. In mechanical ventilation for status asthmaticus, a specific strategy directed at reducing dynamic hyperinflation must be used, with low tidal volumes and long expiratory times, achieved by diminishing respiratory frequency. This ventilatory pattern produces permissive hypercapnia, which is generally well tolerated with suitable sedation. The best methods for detecting and/or controlling dynamic hyperinflation in ventilated patients with status asthmaticus are the flow/time and flow/volume respiratory curves, pulmonary volume at the end of inspiration, and the pressure plateau. In addition to mechanical ventilation the child must receive sedation with or without a muscle relaxant to prevent barotrauma and accidental extubation. Bronchodilator treatment with beta-adrenergic agonists, methyl-prednisolone, and intravenous aminophylline are also required. A combination of inhaled salbutamol and nebulized ipratropium in the inspiratory branch of the ventilator should be used in patients in whom this treatment is effective. Currently there is insufficient evidence on the efficiency of other treatments in status asthmaticus and these should be used as rescue treatments.

Practice parameters in pediatric allergy

The primary role of practice parameter/guidelines and other boundaries developed for the field of medicine is to improve the quality of patient care. Practice parameters/guidelines are also important for education, interaction with managed care and third-party payers, establishing appropriate variables for outcome assessment, reducing inappropriate variation in clinical practice, and resolving medical-legal issues. National specialty organizations, the American Medical Association, and government agencies have been actively involved in developing and promoting practice parameters. These documents provide a framework within which pediatricians can provide the best quality of care for their patients.

Guidelines update: where do the new therapies fit in the management of asthma? NHLBI and WHO Global Initiative for Asthma

The new leukotriene (LT) modifiers have been shown to be effective, safe and convenient 'controller' medications in patients with asthma. However, their use in asthma is recommended only in the most recent US guidelines, and then only as alternative long term controllers in patients with mild persistent asthma. In fact, as has now been shown in a number of studies, LT modifiers are effective in a variety of other asthma settings, and it is expected that expanded roles for these agents will be described in future asthma guidelines. Until then, clinicians aware of the advantages of individualising asthma therapy might consider LT modifiers for the diverse range of patients with asthma who are likely to benefit from the use of these agents.

Allergen-mediated disease: keeping patients active

A nasal corticosteroid is the most effective treatment for allergic rhinitis, but delayed improvement can reduce compliance. Topical vasoconstrictors, cromolyn, and NSAIDs are recommended for allergic conjunctivitis. Some athletes who have exercise-induced or exercise-exacerbated asthma may have a refractory period, which, along with short- and long-term beta-2 agonists, inhaled corticosteroids, and leukotriene antagonists, may be used to manage symptoms. Topical steroids are the main treatment for atopic dermatitis. Drug restrictions by sports governing bodies can limit therapies for competitive athletes.