Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor given to donors before apheresis does not prevent aplasia in patients treated with donor leukocyte infusion for recurrent chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation

Can GCSF-stimulated donor lymphocyte infusions improve outcomes for relapsed disease following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) can produce graft-versus tumor effects to treat relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, however, durable responses remain uncommon. A systematic review and meta-analysis are needed to clarify whether DLI collected after stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF; G-DLI) can improve clinical outcomes. Sixteen studies (4 controlled) involving 585 patients were identified in a systematic search up to 17 September 2020. A meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.52-1.68, p = 0.82; n = 3 studies) or relapse-related mortality (RR: 0.72, 0.44-1.18, p = 0.19; n = 3 studies) between G-DLI and conventional DLI (C-DLI) groups. G-DLI products had similar mean CD3+ cells compared to C-DLI products, but median CD34+ cells/kg were increased. No improvement in disease progression, complete response rates, or risk of developing GVHD was observed with G-DLI, however, greater non-relapse mortality was observed compared to C-DLI. Alternative approaches to enhancing graft-versus-tumor effects are needed.

Mesenchymal stromal cells: a new tool against graft-versus-host disease?

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) represent a heterogeneous subset of multipotent cells that can be isolated from several tissues including bone marrow and fat. MSCs exhibit immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties that prompted their clinical use as prevention and/or treatment for severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Although a number of phase I-II studies have suggested that MSC infusion was safe and might be effective for preventing or treating acute GVHD, definitive proof of their efficacy remains lacking thus far. Multicenter randomized studies are ongoing to more precisely assess the impact of MSC infusion on GVHD prevention/treatment, whereas further research is performed in vitro and in animal models with the aims of determining the best way to expand MSCs ex vivo as well as the most efficient dose and schedule of MSCs administration. After introducing GVHD, MSC biology, and results of MSC infusion in animal models of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, this article reviews the results of the first clinical trials investigating the use of MSC infusion as prevention or treatment of GVHD.

NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Report from the Committee on Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Treatment options for relapse have been inadequate, and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. There is no standard approach to treating relapse after alloHSCT. Withdrawal of immune suppression and donor lymphocyte infusions are commonly used for all diseases; although these interventions are remarkably effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia, they have limited efficacy in other hematologic malignancies. Conventional and novel chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, targeted therapies, and second transplants have been utilized in a variety of relapsed diseases, but reports on these therapies are generally anecdotal and retrospective. As such, there is an immediate need for well-designed, disease-specific trials for treatment of relapse after alloHSCT. This report summarizes current treatment options under investigation for relapse after alloHSCT in a disease-specific manner. In addition, recommendations are provided for specific areas of research necessary in the treatment of relapse after alloHSCT.

The allogeneic graft-versus-cancer effect

Allogeneic haematological stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has developed into immunotherapy. Donor CD4+, CD8+ and natural killer (NK) cells have been reported to mediate graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) effects, using Fas-dependent killing and perforin degranulation to eradicate malignant cells. Cytokines, such as interleukin-2, interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha potentiate the GVL effect. Post-transplant adoptive therapy of cytotoxic T-cells (CTL) against leukaemia-specific antigens, minor histocompatibility antigens, or T-cell receptor genes may constitute successful approaches to induce anti-tumour effects. Clinically, a significant GVL effect is induced by chronic rather than acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). An anti-tumour effect has also been reported for myeloma, lymphoma and solid tumours. Reduced intensity conditioning enables HSCT in older and disabled patients and relies on the graft-versus-tumour effect. Donor lymphocyte infusions promote the GVL effect and can be given as escalating doses with response monitored by minimal residual disease. A high CD34+ cell dose of peripheral blood stem cells increases GVL. There is a balance between effective immunosuppression, low incidence of GVHD and relapse. For instance, T-cell depletion of the graft increases the risk of relapse. This paper reviews the current knowledge in graft-versus-cancer effects. Future directions, such as immunotherapy using leukaemia-specific CTLs, allo-depleted T-cells and suicide gene manipulated T-cells, are presented.

Donor leukocyte infusions for the treatment of relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) offers the only hope for cure for many adults with acute leukemia. Unfortunately, many patients relapse and die of their disease even after transplantation. Although in some cases, allogeneic SCT is effective because the intensive conditioning therapy eradicates all malignant cells, it has long been recognized that the adoptive transfer of donor immunity plays a critically important role in the induction and maintenance of remission. Recognition of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect of allogeneic SCT has prompted attempts at remission re-induction by adoptive immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) in patients with relapsed disease after allogeneic SCT. In some cases, DLI-induced remissions are sustained and patients cured when no other treatment modality was effective. This review discusses the rationale, biology, complications and future applications of DLI in acute leukemia patients after allogeneic SCT.

Results of donor lymphocyte infusions for relapsed myelodysplastic syndrome after hematopoietic cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) represents a potentially curative approach for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). While a large proportion of HCT recipients become long-term disease-free survivors, recurrence of MDS remains the leading cause of mortality after HCT. The role of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in patients with relapsed MDS after HCT is unclear. We report results among 16 patients treated with DLI for relapsed MDS after HCT at a single institution between March 1993 and February 2004. The cohort contained 10 men and 6 women with a median age of 49 (range, 22-67) years. CR with resolution of cytopenias and prior disease markers occurred in 3 of 14 patients who could be evaluated. Two patients survived without MDS for 68 and 65 months after DLI, respectively, but died with pneumonia. Grades II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD occurred after DLI in 6 (43%) and 5 (36%) patients, respectively. All three responders developed grades III-IV acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD after DLI. Our results confirm prior reports that DLI can result in CR in some patients with recurrent MDS after transplant, but long-term survival is infrequent.

Donor leukocyte infusions after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Donor leukocyte infusions provide direct and potent graft-versus-tumor activity to treat relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Extensive data are available on the use of donor leukocyte infusion after matched-sibling stem cell transplantation, but reports are remarkably few on the use of donor leukocyte infusion after unrelated-donor stem cell transplantation. But the role for unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion is not well established.

RECENT FINDINGS

The dramatic success of donor leukocyte infusion to treat relapse after matched-sibling stem cell transplantation has led to the use of unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion in many patients. Several case studies suggest that unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion effectively induces direct graft-versus-tumor reactions with toxicity comparable to that of matched-sibling donor leukocyte infusion. Important issues include the relationship between dose and response/toxicity appropriate timing, dose, and schedule; and identification of the best tumor targets. In particular nonmyeloablative transplant strategies using unrelated donors are expanding rapidly, but relapse rates are high. There is a paucity of data on unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion in this setting.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes recent data on the use of unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion. We discuss anticipated outcomes and identify areas under active investigation in both ablative and nonmyeloablative unrelated-donor stem cell transplantation.

Graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia after donor leukocyte infusion

Although dramatically effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), successful donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) remains limited primarily by inadequate responses for patients with diseases other than CML and by toxicity related to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Acute GVHD grades 2 to 4 follows 34% to 47% of infusions and chronic GVHD occurs in 33% to 61% of cases. Strategies to reduce the incidence and severity of GVHD while preserving the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, such as low-dose DLI, depletion of GVHD effector cells, and tumor-specific DLI, are reviewed.

Analysis of transgene-specific immune responses that limit the in vivo persistence of adoptively transferred HSV-TK-modified donor T cells after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The introduction of an inducible suicide gene such as the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) might allow exploitation of the antitumor activity of donor T cells after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) without graft versus host disease. However, HSV-TK is foreign, and immune responses to gene-modified T cells could lead to their premature elimination. We show that after the infusion of HSV-TK-modified donor T cells to HCT recipients, CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses to HSV-TK are rapidly induced and coincide with the disappearance of transferred cells. Cytokine flow cytometry using an overlapping panel of HSV-TK peptides allowed rapid detection and quantitation of HSV-TK-specific T cells in the blood and identified multiple immunogenic epitopes. Repeated infusion of modified T cells boosted the induced HSV-TK-specific T cells, which persisted as memory cells. These studies demonstrate the need for nonimmunogenic suicide genes and identify a strategy for detection of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses to transgene products that should be generally applicable to monitoring patients on gene therapy trials. The potency of gene-modified T cells to elicit robust and durable immune responses imply this approach might be used for vaccination to elicit T-cell responses to viral or tumor antigens.

Low-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies: separating graft-versus-leukemia effects from graft-versus-host disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past several years, significant advances in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), specifically the development of nonablative and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, have enabled the extension of transplantation to include older or medically infirm patients with myeloid malignancies. The regimens rely largely on graft-versus-leukemia effects rather than high-dose therapy to eliminate malignant cells. Studies have demonstrated that the regimens allow sustained engraftment with relatively low transplant-related mortality. However, conclusions regarding the ultimate efficacy of these regimens for myeloid malignancies have been limited, given the small numbers of patients who have had transplants so far. This review summarizes recent studies of nonablative or reduced-intensity regimens for patients with myeloid malignancies (acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and myeloproliferative disorders). In addition, this review evaluates what is currently known regarding the association of graft-versus-leukemia responses and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). When possible, graft-versus-leukemia responses are highlighted in the articles discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review covers six articles and four abstracts that have been published since September 2003 on patients with myeloid malignancies who received HCT following nonmyeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning. Due to the heterogeneity of the conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens, direct comparisons between studies are difficult. However, these studies have demonstrated encouraging overall survivals (30 to 74%), disease-free/event-free or progression-free survivals (19 to 62%), and nonrelapse mortalities (15 to 55%). In addition, these studies demonstrated evidence for graft-versus-leukemia responses. However, relapse and progressive disease continued to be problems, particularly in patients with large tumor burdens at time of HCT.

SUMMARY

Over the past 10 years, significant advances have been made in the field of transplantation. Nonmyeloablative and reduced-intensity HCT have promised patients with hematologic and nonhematologic malignancies potential cures. However, disease relapse and nonrelapse mortality, mainly from GVHD and its therapy, continue to be problems. Future studies are needed to increase our understanding of GVHD and graft-versus-leukemia responses, which will greatly improve outcome. In addition, a better understanding of minor histocompatibility antigens may lead to more targeted immunotherapy and enhance the precision and success of transplantation.

Serious graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation following nonmyeloablative conditioning

The efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) after nonmyeloablative conditioning depends on the balance between the desirable antineoplastic effects of donor cells weighed against the undesirable morbidity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Development of serious acute or chronic GVHD was analyzed retrospectively in 171 consecutive patients, who had related or unrelated nonmyeloablative HCT for hematologic malignancies. GVHD was defined as serious when it resulted in (1) death, (2) disability, (3) three or more major infections in 1 year, (4) prolonged hospitalization or (5) suicide or hospitalization for suicidal ideation. According to this definition, 43 of 171 (25%) patients developed serious GVHD with a median follow-up of 30 (range, 12-65) months. The incidence of serious GVHD was similar after related and unrelated HCT. Among the 43 patients with serious GVHD, 20 had grade III-IV acute GVHD, and 30 had extensive chronic GVHD. Among the 171 patients, seven had grade III acute GVHD and 84 had extensive chronic GVHD that did not meet criteria for serious GVHD. Assessment of serious GVHD provides additional useful information to acute GVHD grades and classification of limited and extensive chronic GVHD in describing the overall risk and impact complications caused by donor cells.

The impact of granulocyte colony stimulating factor at content of donor lymphocytes collected for cellular immunotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) have become widely used for prevention or treatment of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Increasing use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens (RICR) and subsequent application of DLI forced the hemapheresis centers to collect donor lymphocytes in certain quantity and quality. The place of growth factors especially granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF, filgrastim) in allogeneic hemapoietic stem cell (HSC) collection is established, but there is no consensus about the role of rhG-CSF. We aimed to clarify the dose effect of rhG-CSF on lymphocyte subpopulations (CD3+, CD3+4+, CD3+8+, CD19+, CD3-16+56+) cells and CD34+ HSC.

DONORS AND METHODS

Major indications for DLI (mean volume: 180+/-52 ml) were for relapse or transplants using RICR mainly in patients with acute leukemia (n=20) or chronic myeloid leukemia (n=15). In four years we performed 40 lymphocyte apheresis (LA) on 30 healthy (med. age 28, M/F 21/9) donors using continuous flow cell separators by processing 2-2.5 times of their total blood volume (TBV). The apheresis data is divided into three groups according to rhG-CSF dose used for priming. Donors in Group I (n=18), Group II (n=9) and Group III (n=13) received no rhG-CSF (steady state), rhG-CSF 5 microg/kg/dsc x 5 days and rhG-CSF 10 microg/kg/dsc x 5 days, respectively. There was no difference within groups concerning TBV processed and recipient body weight.

RESULTS

A total of 11,565 ml (+/-3700) of blood was processed in 216 min (+/-36.5) at an inlet of 56.8 ml/min (+/-10.6) using 999 ml (+/-307) ACD. The CD34+ HSC increased with increasing rhG-CSF dose as expected. Median CD3+ lymphocyte yield per recipient body weight in Group I, II and III were 0.9 x 10e8/kg (range: 0.1-2.1), 2.9 x 10e8/kg (range: 1.6-4.3) and 2.1 x 10e8/kg (range: 0.6-6.9), respectively. The primed donors T lymphocyte yield was 2-3-fold more in comparison to Group I. This gain was most significant between Group I and III in terms of mean CD3+ (1.09 x 10e8/kg vs 2.41 x 10e8/kg, p=0.02), CD3+4+ (0.64 x 10e8/kg vs 1.44 x 10e8/kg, p=0.02) and CD3+8+ (0.42 x 10e8/kg vs 0.89 x 10e8/kg, p=0.03) cells, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Though the yield of lymphocyte subsets in G-CSF primed donors exceeds the non-primed donors, the target range of 1 x 10e7-1 x 10e8/kg CD3+ lymphocytes could be achieved in the majority of the apheresis procedures without rhG-CSF priming. The yield of T and B lymphocyte subsets are increased by G-CSF stimulation but not on a logarithmic scale, which did not correlate into a clinical relevance.

Donor lymphocyte infusions to treat hematologic malignancies in relapse after allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with hematologic malignancies in relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation can be treated by infusing leukocytes from the original stem cell donor.

METHODS

The published literature on donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was reviewed.

RESULTS

DLI induces complete remissions in the majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in early-stage relapse and in less than 30% of patients with relapsed acute leukemia, myelodysplasia, and multiple myeloma. DLI-induced remissions of chronic phase CML are durable, but as many as half of patients with other diseases ultimately relapse. Complications of DLI include acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) and aplasia, which induce profound immunosuppression and susceptibility to opportunistic infections. There is a strong correlation of GVHD and disease response.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel methods of augmenting the antitumor efficacy of DLI and of dissociating the graft-vs-leukemia effect from GVHD are needed. These studies will require an improved understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of alloreactivity and the development of novel agents to control the nature and intensity of the alloimmune response.

Prospective trial of chemotherapy and donor leukocyte infusions for relapse of advanced myeloid malignancies after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced myeloid malignancies who experience relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) have a poor prognosis. Long-term survival after chemotherapy alone, second myeloablative transplant, or donor leukocyte infusions (DLIs) alone is unusual. DLIs may have minimal effectiveness in advanced disease because adequate cellular responses are not able to develop in the presence of bulky, fast-growing disease. A chemotherapy strategy was used to debulk disease before administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed DLIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients experiencing hematologic relapse of myeloid malignancy after HLA-matched sibling BMT were prospectively treated with cytarabine-based chemotherapy, then G-CSF-primed DLIs. No prophylactic immunosuppression was provided.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 57 assessable patients experienced a complete response. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was observed in 56% of the patients. Treatment-related mortality was 23%. Overall survival at 2 years for the entire cohort was 19%. Patients with a complete response were more likely to survive, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 51% and 41%, respectively, with a median follow-up of more than 2 years. The 1-year survival for nonresponders was 5%. A posttransplant remission lasting more than 6 months before relapse was associated with a higher likelihood of response. GVHD was not required for durable remission.

CONCLUSION

Salvage treatment with chemotherapy before DLI can help some patients with advanced myeloid relapse and is not dependent on GVHD. Patients with short remissions after BMT are unlikely to benefit from this approach, and the approach is associated with significant treatment-related mortality. Modifications of this approach or entirely different approaches will be required for most patients with this difficult clinical problem.

Unrelated donor leukocyte infusions to treat relapse after unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) may cure many patients with hematologic malignancies due to both the intensive conditioning therapy, and in many patients, the potent graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) effect of the donor graft. The GVL effect is mediated in large part by mature T-cells contained in the donor graft and has been defined in detail in animal models of transplantation. The GVL activity has been observed in the clinical setting after SCT from both matched siblings and unrelated donors. The best demonstration and most direct evidence of GVL activity in humans come from the use of donor leukocyte infusions (DLI). For patients who relapse with chronic myelogenous leukemia after matched sibling SCT, infusions of leukocytes collected from the original transplant donor will re-establish complete and durable remission in 60-80% of patients. DLI is less effective for more advanced phases of CML and for patients who relapse with diseases other than CML. DLI after matched sibling SCT is complicated primarily by graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), marrow aplasia, and unfortunately, relapse in some cases. There has been little information regarding the use of unrelated DLI (UDLI). Available data now shows that despite initial concerns that UDLI would result in excessive toxicity, it is an effective approach to relapse after unrelated donor marrow grafting. Response rates are similar to those seen after the use of matched sibling DLI, and many remissions remain durable. Graft-vs-host disease is a frequent complication after UDLI though the incidence and severity of GVHD is also similar to the use of matched sibling DLI. It is not clear that the GVL and GVHD effects can be separated, since the majority of responding patients also develop GVHD. The most effective cell dose for UDLI has not been established, though there does not appear to be either a dose-response or dose-toxicity relationship from UDLI. Although second unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT) may cure a small minority of patients, GVL induction with UDLI offers a safer and potentially more effective therapy for relapsed leukemia, and offers insights in methods to manipulate the human immune system for therapeutic benefit.

Recent publications in hematological oncology

In order to keep subscribers up-to-date with the latest developments in their field, John Wiley & Sons are providing a current awareness service in each issue of the journal. The bibliography contains newly published material in the field of hematological oncology. Each bibliography is divided into 14 sections: 1 Books, Reviews & Symposia; 2 General; Leukemias: 3 Lymphoblastic; 4 Myeloid & Myelodysplastic Syndromes; 5 Chronic; 6 Others; Lymphomas: 7 Hodgkin's; 8 Non-Hodgkin's; 9 Plasmacytomas/Multiple Myelomas; 10 Others; 11 Bone Marrow Transplantation; 12 Cytokines; 13 Diagnosis; 14 Cytogenetics. Within each section, articles are listed in alphabetical order with respect to author. If, in the preceding period, no publications are located relevant to any one of these headings, that section will be omitted.

Peripheral blood stem cells for allogeneic transplantation: a review

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) have become increasingly popular for use in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PBSCs are readily collected by continuous-flow apheresis from patients and healthy donors after the administration of s.c. recombinant colony-stimulating factors with only minimal morbidity and discomfort. Although the precise identification of PBSCs remains elusive, they can be phenotypically identified as a subset of all circulating CD34(+) cells. There are important phenotypic and biologic distinctions between PBSCs and bone marrow (BM)-derived progenitor cells. PBSCs express more lineage-specific antigens but are less metabolically active than their BM-derived counterparts. The use of PBSCs for allogeneic transplantation has been compared to BM in several randomized trials and cohort studies. The use of PBSCs in leukemia, myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and myelodysplasia has resulted in shorter times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment at the expense of increased rates of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The increase in graft-versus-host disease is mainly due to a log-fold increase in donor T cells transferred with the graft. Relapse rates after transplantation may be lower after PBSC transplantation but a convincing survival advantage has not been demonstrated overall. It is possible that a stronger graft-versus-tumor effect may exist with PBSCs when compared with BM although the mechanisms leading to this effect are not clear.