Gastroesophageal reflux after intact vertical banded gastroplasty: correction by conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Foregut Malignancy After Metabolic Surgery: a Literature Review

Obesity is known to be epidemiologically associated with malignancy. Although there is an increasing global number of bariatric surgeries, the relationship between bariatric surgery and esophagogastric cancers is not well understood. Diagnosis of esophagogastric cancers following bariatric surgery is challenging because the presentation tends to be nonspecific and may be perceived as usual postoperative symptoms in bariatric patients. Therefore, the early diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. In addition, endoscopic investigation of the excluded stomach after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or a one-anastomosis gastric bypass is technically challenging, which further complicates the diagnosis. The aim of this study is to review the current evidence in the literature on esophagogastric cancers following bariatric surgery.

Barrett's Oesophagus and Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery-IFSO 2020 Position Statement

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has been playing an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical community at large about the importance of surgical and/or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The occurrence of chronic conditions following bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS), such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and columnar (intestinal) epithelial metaplasia of the distal oesophagus (also known as Barrett's oesophagus (BE)), has long been discussed in the metabolic surgical and medical community. Equally, the risk of neoplastic progression of Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the resulting requirement for surgery are the source of some concern for many involved in the care of these patients, as the surgical alteration of the gastrointestinal tract may lead to impaired reconstructive options. As such, there is a requirement for guidance of the community.The IFSO commissioned a task force to elucidate three aspects of the presenting problem: First, to determine what the estimated incidence of Barrett's oesophagus is in patients presenting for BMS; second, to determine the frequency at which Barrett's oesophagus may develop following BMS (with a particular focus on the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)); and third, to determine if regression of Barrett's oesophagus may occur following BMS given the close relationship of obesity and the development of BE/EAC. Based on these findings, a position statement regarding the management of this pathology in the context of BMS was developed. The following position statement is issued by the IFSO Barrett's Oesophagus task force andapproved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed regularly.

Gastro-Intestinal Tract Cancers Following Bariatric Surgery: a Narrative Review

The association between obesity and malignancies has been identified epidemiologically. Meanwhile, the increasing global number of bariatric surgeries is reported annually; bariatric surgery's effect on different types of cancers is not well understood. Unfortunately, nonspecific presentations and difficulties regarding investigations make diagnosis challenging. The aim of this study is to compile available data about gastro-intestinal (GI) cancers, occurring after different bariatric surgeries. Although GI cancers are considered a rare complication of obesity surgery, they do exist, and diagnosis needs a high index of suspicion.

A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Revisional surgery is an important component of addressing weight regain and complications following primary bariatric surgery. Owing to provincial need and the complexity of this patient population, a specialized multidisciplinary revision clinic was developed. We sought to characterize patients who undergo revision surgery and compare their outcomes with primary bariatric surgery clinic data.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective chart review of bariatric revision clinic patients compared with primary bariatric surgery patients from December 2009 to June 2014.

RESULTS

We reviewed the charts of 2769 primary bariatric clinic patients, 886 of whom had bariatric surgery, and 534 revision bariatric clinic patients, 83 of whom had revision surgery. Fewer revision clinic patients underwent surgery than primary clinic patients (22% v. 32%). The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 44.7 ± 9.5 in revision patients compared with 45.7 ± 7.6 in primary bariatric surgery patients. Most revision patients had a prior vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG; 48%) or a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB; 24%). Bands were removed in 36% of all LAGB patients presenting to clinic. Of the 134 procedures performed in the revision clinic, 83 were bariatric weight loss surgeries, and 51 were band removals. Revision clinic patients experienced a significant decrease in BMI (from 44.7 ± 9.5 to 33.8 ± 7.5, p < 0.001); their BMI at 12-month follow-up was similar to that of primary clinic patients (34.5 ± 7.0, p = 0.7). Complications were significantly more frequent in revision patients than primary patients (41% v. 15%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A bariatric revision clinic manages a wide variety of complex patients distinct from those seen in a primary clinic. Operative candidates at the revision clinic are chosen based on favourable medical, anatomic and psychosocial factors, keeping in mind the resource constraints of a public health care system.

Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications

BACKGROUND

There are growing numbers of patients who require revisional bariatric surgery due to the undesirable results of their primary procedures. The aim of this study was to review our experience with bariatric patients undergoing revisional surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis to review the indications for revisional bariatric procedures and assess their postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

From 04/04 to 01/11, 2,918 patients underwent bariatric surgery at our institution. A total of 154 patients (5.3%) of these cases were coded as revisional procedures. The mean age at revision was 49.1 ± 11.3 and the mean BMI was 44.0 ± 13.7 kg/m2. Revisional surgery was performed laparoscopically in 121 patients (78.6%). Laparoscopic revisions had less blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay, and fewer complications compared to open revisions. Two groups (A and B) were defined by the indication for revision: patients with unsuccessful weight loss (group A, n = 106) and patients with complications of their primary procedures (group B, n = 48). In group A, 74.5% of the patients were revised to a bypass procedure and 25.5% to a restrictive procedure. Mean excess weight loss was 53.7 ± 29.3% after revision of primary restrictive procedures and 37.6 ± 35.1% after revision of bypass procedures at >1-year follow-up (p < 0.05). In group B, the complications prompting revision were effectively treated by revisional surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Revisional bariatric surgery effectively treated the undesirable results from primary bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic revisional surgery can be performed after both failed open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures without a prohibitive complication rate. Carefully selected patients undergoing revision for weight regain have satisfactory additional weight loss.

The effects of sleeve gastectomy on gastro-esophageal reflux and gastro-esophageal motility

Sleeve gastrectomy is an increasingly performed bariatric procedure associated with low morbidity and good short to medium term effects on weight loss and comorbid conditions. Studies assessing the prevalence of post-operative gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), show sleeve gastrectomy may provoke de novo GERD symptoms or worsening of pre-existing GERD. Pathophysiological mechanisms of GERD after sleeve gastrectomy include a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter, increased gastro-esophageal pressure gradient and intra-thoracic migration of the remnant stomach. A reduction in the compliance of the gastric remnant may provoke an increase in transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations. Time-resolved MRI suggests relative gastric stasis in the proximal remnant and increased emptying from the antrum. A lack of standardisation of technique, along with heterogeneity of studies assessing GERD may explain the wide variability in reported results. Simultaneous and careful repair of an associated hiatus hernia may result in a reduction in the prevalence of post-operative GERD.

Benign, premalignant, and malignant lesions encountered in bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with several comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. It is also well established that obese patients have an increased risk of several types of cancer like kidney, pancreas, endometrial, breast, and others. The bariatric surgeon needs to be aware of the problem of benign tumors and cancer in obese patients as well as the optimal management of these conditions that may be present at the time of evaluation for bariatric surgery, during the surgical procedure, and in the postoperative period.

DATABASE

A PubMed search for the words "cancer" and "bariatric surgery" and subsequent review of the abstracts identified 40 articles concerning cancerous, benign, and premalignant conditions in bariatric surgery patients. Data were then extracted from full-text articles.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery decreases cancer risk especially in women. RYGB can be an effective treatment for Barrett's esophagus. Patients having esophageal cancer should not undergo bariatric surgery, while those who develop the same postoperatively are usually managed by a combined abdominal and thoracic approach (Ivor Lewis technique). Gastric cancer of the remnant stomach is usually managed by a remnant gastrectomy. A remnant gastrectomy during RYGB would be necessary in conditions that require endoscopic surveillance of the stomach like gastric polyps, intestinal metaplasia, and carcinoid tumors. Sleeve gastrectomy is an excellent option in a patient with GIST or a carcinoid who needs a bariatric operation. Preoperative endoscopy usually does not detect malignant conditions. Postoperative evaluation of the bypassed stomach is possible using various percutaneous and novel endoscopic techniques.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: a multicenter experience with 203 patients

BACKGROUND

Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) has long been the main restrictive procedure for morbid obesity but has many long-term complications for which conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is often considered the best option.

METHODS

This series regroups patients operated on by three different surgeons in four different centers. All data were collected prospectively, then pooled and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Out of 2,522 RYGBP performed between 1998 and 2010, 538 were reoperations, including 203 laparoscopic RYGBP after VBG. There were 175 women and 28 men. The mean BMI before VBG was 43.2 ± 6.3, and the mean BMI before reoperation was 37.4 ± 8.3. Most patients had more than one indication for reoperation and/or had regained significant weight. There was no conversion to open surgery. A total of 24 patients (11.8 %) developed complications, including nine (4.5 %) who required reoperation and one death. With a follow-up of 88.9 % after 8 years, the mean BMI after 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years was 29.1, 28.8, 28.7, 29.9, and 28.8, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this experience, the largest with laparoscopic reoperative RYGBP after failed VBG, we conclude that this procedure can safely be performed in experienced hands, with weight loss results similar to those observed after primary RYGBP. In patients with too difficult an anatomy below the cardia, dividing the esophagus just above the esophago-gastric junction and performing an esophagojejunostomy may be a safe alternative to converting to a Scopinaro-type BPD, obviating the additional long-term risks associated with malabsorption.

Gastroesophageal reflux after vertical banded gastroplasty is alleviated by conversion to gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Conversion operations after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) are sometimes performed because of vomiting and/or acid regurgitation. Primary operation with gastric bypass (GBP) is known to reduce gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Previous studies have not been designed to differentiate between the effects of the altered anatomy and of the ensuing weight loss. No series has reported data on acid reflux before and after conversion from VBG to GBP.

METHODS

We invited eight VBG patients with current symptoms of GERD. All had intact staple lines as assessed by barium meal and gastroscopy. Acid reflux was quantified using 48-h Bravo capsule measurements. Conversion operations were performed creating an isolated 15-20-ml pouch; the previously banded part of gastric wall was excised. Gastrojejunostomy was made end to end with a 28-mm circular stapler. The study is based on five patients consenting to early postoperative endoscopy and pH measurement.

RESULTS

All patients were women with a mean age of 49.5 years and BMI of 36.3. Time since VBG was 132.1 months. Time from conversion to second measurement was 46.6 days and BMI at that time 32.7. There was no mortality and no serious morbidity. All patients improved clinically and no patient had to go back on proton pump inhibition or antacids. Total time with pH < 4.0 was reduced from 18.4% to 3.3% (p < 0.05). DeMeester score was reduced from 58.1 to 15.9 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of converting VBG-operated patients to GBP results in a near-normalisation of acid reflux parameters and a discontinuation of proton pump inhibitor medication.

Revisional bariatric surgery

With the increase in bariatric surgical procedures, an increase in revision operations is expected. A thorough preoperative work-up is essential to formulate an appropriate revision strategy. Outcomes vary according to the primary operation and chosen approach to revision. Recent studies have shown acceptably low complication rates and good weight loss with the associated health benefits. Although there is no direct evidence in the form of randomized studies indicating which patients with inadequate weight loss or weight regain will benefit most from revision, or to support one particular revision approach rather than another, it is possible to develop general, effective strategies.

Laparoscopic revision of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes of 105 patients

BACKGROUND

Although vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) was endorsed by the 1991 National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference for the treatment of morbid obesity, it has largely been abandoned owing to the poor long-term weight loss and band-related complications. The objective of the present study was to review the outcomes of patients who had undergone laparoscopic conversion of VBG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for weight loss or dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from all patients who had undergone revision of VBG to RYGB was performed. The data on the symptoms, weight loss, co-morbidities, and complications were collected.

RESULTS

From July 1999 to April 2010, 2397 bariatric procedures were performed. Of these, 105 (4.4%) were laparoscopic revisions of previous VBG to RYGB. Of the 105 patients, 103 had undergone open VBG and 2 laparoscopic VBG. Of the 105 patients, 97 were women and 8 were men. The average patient age was 49 years (range 23-71). The median preoperative body mass index was 42 kg/m(2) (range 20-72). Short- and long-term complications occurred in 40 patients (38%). No patients died. The median length of stay was 2 days. At an average follow-up of 31 months (range 1-96), the median percentage of excess weight loss was 47% (range -24% to 138%). The median decrease in body mass index was 8 kg/m(2) (range -6 to 30). Dysphagia had improved or resolved in 100%. Gastroesophageal reflux disease had improved or resolved in 95%. Diabetes had improved or went into remission in 90%. Hypertension had improved or resolved in 62%. Obstructive sleep apnea had improved or resolved in 96%.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that laparoscopic revision of VBG to RYGB is a feasible procedure that can provide acceptable weight loss and reversal of weight-related co-morbidities. Complications were common after revisional bariatric surgery.

Effects of adjustable gastric banding on gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility: a systematic review

Controversial opinions exist concerning the effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on gastroesophageal reflux. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant studies on patients undergoing adjustable gastric banding. Data are expressed in mean (range). Twenty studies were identified with a total of 3307 patients. The prevalence of reflux symptoms decreased postoperatively from 32.9% (16-57) to 7.7% (0-26.9) and medication use from 27.5% (16-38.5) to 9.5% (3.1-19.2). Newly developed reflux symptoms were found in 15% (6.1-20) of the patients. The percentage of esophagitis decreased postoperatively from 33.3% (19.4-61.6) to 27% (2.3-60.8). Newly developed esophagitis was observed in 22.9% (0-38.4). Pathological reflux was found in 55.8% (34.9-77.4) preoperatively and postoperatively in 29.4% (0-41.7) of the patients. Lower esophageal sphincter pressures increased from 12.9 to 16.9 mmHg (11.3-21.4). Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation decreased from 100% to 79.7% (58-86). The percentage of dysmotility increased from 3.5% (0-10) to 12.6% (0-25). Adjustable gastric banding has anti-reflux properties resulting in resolution or improvement of reflux symptoms, normalized pH monitoring results and a decrease of esophagitis on short term. However, worsening or newly developed reflux symptoms and esophagitis are found in a subset of patients during longer follow-up.

Manometric changes of the lower esophageal sphincter after sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has been accepted as an option for surgical treatment of obesity. After surgery, some patients present reflux symptoms associated with endoscopic esophagitis, therefore PPI's treatment must be indicated.

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the manometric characteristic of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) before and after sleeve gastrectomy

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This prospective study includes 20 patients submitted to esophageal manometry in order to determine the resting pressure, and total and abdominal LES length before and after the sleeve gastrectomy. Statistical variations on the LESP were validated according to Student's "t" test.

RESULTS

Seventeen female and three male patients were included, with a mean age of 37.6 +/- 12.6 years. All patients reduced their body weight, from an initial BMI of 38.3 kg/m(2) to 28.2 kg/m(2) 6 months after surgery. No postoperative complications were observed in these patients. Preoperative mean LESP was 14.2 +/- 5.8 mmHg. Postoperative manometry decreased in 17/20 (85%), with a mean value of 11.2 +/- 5.7 mmHg (p = 0.01). Seven of them presented LESP <12 mmHg and ten patients <6 mmHg after the operation. Furthermore, the abdominal length and total length of the high pressure zone at the esophagogastric junction were affected.

CONCLUSION

A sleeve gastrectomy produces an important decrease in LES pressure, which can in turn cause the appearance of reflux symptoms and esophagitis after the operation due to a partial resection of the sling fibers during the gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty to duodenal switch

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective consecutive study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and open vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) into duodenal switch (DS) by laparoscopy.

METHODS

From November 2003 to February 2007, laparoscopic conversion into DS was performed in 1-step in 43 patients, 31 after LAGB and 12 after VBG. The reason for conversion was weight loss issues, such as insufficient excess weight loss (EWL) or weight regain. The mean interval from LAGB and VBG to conversion to the DS was 42.7 +/- 28.7 months and 172.2 +/- 86.9 months, respectively. The mean %EWL at conversion was 8.3% +/- 19.3% after LAGB and 20.8% +/- 30% after VBG.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 205.8 +/- 44.8 minutes for LAGB and 210.9 +/- 53.7 minutes for VBG. No conversions to open surgery occurred. One patient in the LAGB group died on the third postoperative day of sudden death syndrome, as shown by the postmortem examination. Major complications occurred in 6.4% of patients with LAGB (1 hemoperitoneum and 1 ileoileostomy leak) and in 50% with VBG (1 sleeve gastrectomy leak with subsequent duodenoileostomy leak, 3 duodenoileostomy leaks, 1 pancreatitis, and 1 respiratory insufficiency). The mean hospital stay was 5.5 +/- 5 days for the LAGB group and 34.5 +/- 50.3 days for the VBG group. After a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 15.7 months for LAGB to DS and 43.5 +/- 6 months for VBG to DS, reoperations for late complications were required in 6 patients (20.6%) in the LAGB to DS group and in 5 patients (62.5%) in the VBG to DS group. Three patients (25%) died within 8 months after conversion of VBG. The 29 surviving patients (LAGB to DS) showed a mean %EWL and percentage of excess body mass index loss of (%EBMIL) 78.4% +/- 24.9% and 77.8% +/- 23.7%, respectively. The 8 surviving patients (VBG to DS) had a mean %EWL and %EBMIL of 85.1% +/- 20% and 85.8% +/- 18.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to these results, laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to DS seems feasible and effective, despite the 1 death. However, in our hands, laparoscopic conversion of VBG to DS had an unacceptable rate of complications and deaths.

Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

Approximately one-third of U.S. adults are obese. Current evidence suggests that surgical therapies offer the morbidly obese the best hope for substantial and sustainable weight loss, with a resultant reduction in morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive methods have altered the demand for bariatric procedures. However, no evidence-based clinical reviews yet exist to guide patients and surgeons in selecting the bariatric operation most applicable to a given situation.

METHODS

This evidenced-based review is presented in conjunction with a clinical practice guideline developed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). References were reviewed by the authors and graded as to the level of evidence. Recommendations were developed and qualified by the level of supporting evidence available at the time of the associated SAGES guideline publication. The guideline also was reviewed and co-endorsed by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

RESULTS

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity, producing durable weight loss, improvement of comorbid conditions, and longer life. Patient selection algorithms should favor individual risk-benefit considerations over traditional anthropometric and demographic limits. Bariatric care should be delivered within credentialed multidisciplinary systems. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RGB), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD + DS) are validated procedures that may be performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) also is a promising procedure. Comparative data find that procedures with more dramatic clinical benefits carry greater risks, and those offering greater safety and flexibility are associated with less reliable efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic RGB, AGB, BPD + DS, and primary LSG have been proved effective. Currently, the choice of operation should be driven by patient and surgeon preferences, as well as by considerations regarding the relative importance placed on discrete outcomes.

Indications and results of reversal of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG)

INTRODUCTION

Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) was initiated in 1980 as a weight loss operation that restricted oral intake.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to determine the results of patients who presented with complications of the VBG and wanted reversal of the VBG, not a conversion to another gastric weight loss operation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1993 to 2008, 27 patients had reversal of a VBG. Of the patients, 85% were female and presented on average 13 years (range 2-27 years) after the VBG. Presenting symptoms included nausea/vomiting in 88%, reflux in 65%, stricture requiring endoscopic dilatation in 38%, while 7% of patients had upper gastrointestinal bleeding or required total parenteral nutrition. Patients were offered conversion to another weight loss operation but decided on reversal of the VBG alone. All reversals were performed in a similar manner by placing a linear stapler through a gastrotomy resulting in division of the polypropylene mesh band, and reversal of the VBG pouch.

RESULTS

No patients died from the procedure and morbidity included one wound infection and one wound seroma. Preoperative Visick score decreased significantly after reversal, while reflux symptoms resolved in 93% of patients.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that reversal of a VBG results in symptomatic relief in the majority of patients.

Use of endoluminal antireflux therapies for obese patients with GERD

BACKGROUND

Obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to medical therapy are a challenging patient population as obesity is a preoperative predictor of failure after antireflux surgery. We therefore sought to evaluate outcomes using one of two commercially available endoluminal therapies in this population.

METHODS

Consecutive obese patients (body mass index (BMI)>30) with GERD (DeMeester>14.5) undergoing either Plicator (NDO) or Stretta (Curon) were identified in our single-institution prospective database. Outcomes assessed were: (1) failure rate (absolutely no symptomatic improvement after procedure and/or need for subsequent antireflux surgery), (2) postoperative vs. preoperative symptom (heartburn, chest pain, regurgitation, dysphagia, cough, hoarseness, and asthma) scores, and (3) proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) medication use.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients each underwent an endoluminal therapy (ten Plicator patients and 12 Stretta patients) with mean follow-up of 1.5 years. There were no treatment-associated complications. Mean BMI was not different between Plicator and Stretta groups (39.6 vs. 38.6, respectively, p=0.33). The failure rate for the entire cohort was 28% (10% Plicator vs. 42% Stretta, p=0.11). The proportion of patients reporting moderate/severe symptoms postop was significantly less than preop: chest pain 9% vs. 13% (p=0.04), cough 22% vs. 36% preop (p=0.025), voice changes 9% vs. 36% preop (p=0.012), and dysphagia 9% vs. 32% preop (p=0.04). The proportion of patients on PPI medications postop was also less than preop (45% vs. 81%, p=0.1)

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal treatment can provide a safe means of improving GERD symptoms for some obese patients, though many will continue to require medication therapy also. Further work aimed at understanding optimal candidates for endoluminal therapy in this patient population is warranted.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbid obesity: the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition in obesity. The impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) on GERD is poorly known. We studied the effect of the RYGBP on GERD in patients with morbid obesity (MO).

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with MO (BMI > 40 kg/m(2)) were studied before and 6 months after RYGBP. GERD symptoms were evaluated with Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ). All the patients underwent esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-h pH-metry. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, and Wilcoxon test was used for numerical variables. A p value under 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There were 16 women (80%) and 4 men (20%) with mean age 38.9 +/- 6.9 years included in this study. BMI was 48.5 +/- 6.2 kg/m(2) and 33.2 +/- 4.5 kg/m(2) before and after RYGBP, respectively. Mean weight reduction was 42.5 +/- 9.7 kg (p < 0.001). Reflux symptoms measured by CDQ and esophageal acid exposure improved significantly after RYGBP. The percentage of time of pH < 4 was 10.7 +/- 6.7 before and 1.6 +/- 1.2 after the surgical procedure (p < 0.001). LES basal pressure before and after the RYGBP was 18 +/- 11 and 20.1 +/- 5.6 mmHg (p = 0.372), and the esophageal body amplitude was 104.2 +/- 47.2 and 75.1 +/- 36.2 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

RYGBP improves GERD symptoms and reduces esophageal acid exposure in patients with MO.

Laparoscopic conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

The vertical banded gastroplasty was the mainstay of bariatric surgery for over a decade. Though this procedure is now rarely performed many of these patients will present with failure or maladaptive eating and its sequelae. Some of these patients who demonstrate the motivation for lifestyle modification as well as many of these with complications will be candidates for revisional surgery. This article reviews the technical challenges in performing these revisions using minimally invasive techniques. In addition it reviews outcomes of laparoscopic conversion and tips for patient selection and success.

An experimental study of the electrical activity of the bypassed stomach in the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Surgical options for morbid obesity are diverse, and the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, initially described by Fobi has gained popularity. Knowledge about the physiology of the bypassed stomach is limited because this newly produced segment of the stomach is inaccessible to endoscopic or contrast radiological studies. AIM: To evaluate the myoelectric activity of the bypassed stomach and its reply to the feeding. METHODS: An experimental protocol was conducted to evaluate postoperative gastric bypassed motility in dogs submitted to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure. Two groups of five animals were studied on postoperative fasting and after a standard meal, recording electrical response and control activity. Both control and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operated study group had a pair of electrodes placed on three points of the remaining stomach: fundus, body and antrum. Data registration was performed after complete ileus resolution, and analysed with DATA Q Inst. series 200. RESULTS: The results achieved on the conditions of this study suggest that: 1. the remaining stomach maintain the same pattern of motility; 2. there is a reduced fasting electromyography activity following the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure; 3. significantly reduced fasting electric control activity when compared both groups, and a markedly reduced fasting response electric activity and; 4. the electric response to the feeding kept the same standard of the stomach, however in a statistically reduced way. CONCLUSION: The electrical activity of the bypassed stomach of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure kept the same pattern but in a statistically reduced number of contraction.

Conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass results in restoration of the positive effect on weight loss and co-morbidities: evaluation of 101 patients

BACKGROUND

Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is a widely used restrictive procedure in bariatric surgery. However, the re-operation rate after this operation is high. In the case of VBG failure, a conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is an option. A study was undertaken to evaluate the results of the conversion from VBG to RYGBP.

METHODS

101 patients had conversion from VBG to RYGBP. Patients were separated into 3 groups, based on the indication for conversion: weight regain (group 1), excessive weight loss (group 2) and severe eating difficulties (group 3). Data for the study were collected by retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data.

RESULTS

Weight regain (group 1) was the reason for conversion in 73.3% of patients. Staple-line disruption was the most important cause for the weight regain (74.3%). Excessive weight loss (group 2) affected 14% of patients and was caused by outlet stenosis in 78.6% of patients. The remaining 13% had severe eating difficulties as a result of outlet stenosis (46.1%), pouch dilatation (30.8%) and pouch diverticula (23.1%). Mean BMI before conversion to RYGBP was 40.5, 22.3 and 29.8 kg/m2 in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Minor or major direct postoperative complications were observed in 2.0% to 7.0%. Long-term complications were more frequent, and consisted mainly of anastomotic stenosis (22.7%) and incisional hernia (16.8%). Follow-up after conversion was achieved in all patients (100%), with a mean period of 38 +/- 29 months. BMI decreased from 40.5 to 30.1 kg/m2, increased from 22.3 to 25.3 kg/m2. and decreased slightly from 29.8 to 29.0 kg/m2 in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. All patients in group 3 noticed an improvement in eating difficulties.

CONCLUSION

Complications after conversion from failed VBG to RYGBP are substantial and need to be considered. However, the conversion itself is a successful operation in terms of effect on body weight and treating eating difficulties after VBG.

A two-decade spectrum of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

Ineffective weight loss or complications of previous bariatric surgery often require revisional bariatric procedures. Our aim was to define the indications, operative approach, and outcomes of revisional bariatric procedures during 2 decades at a tertiary center.

METHODS

From our prospective database (n = 1584), including 1985-2004, 218 patients (14%) underwent revisional bariatric procedures. Follow-up (mean 7 yr, range 1 mo to 19 yr) data obtained from patient records and questionnaires were current for 98%. Patients were grouped according to operative indications: group 1, unsatisfactory weight loss (n = 97); group 2, mechanical/symptomatic complications (n = 95); and group 3, severe nutritional/metabolic problems (n = 26).

RESULTS

The operative mortality rate was 0.9% (1 case each of pulmonary embolus and cardiac arrest). The serious operative morbidity rate was 26% (wound infection in 13%, leak in 3%, pulmonary embolus in 2%, anemia/hemorrhage in 2%, pneumonia/prolonged ventilation in 2%, and other in 4%). Of the 218 patients, 94% underwent conversion to, or revision of, Roux-en-y gastric bypass. Group 1 achieved substantial weight reduction with a mean body mass index from 51 +/- 1 to 38 +/- 1 kg/m(2), the complications resolved in 88% of group 2, and the nutritional/metabolic problems resolved in 79% of group 3. Patients who underwent revisional surgery 1990 were more likely to present with mechanical/symptomatic/metabolic complications than for unsuccessful weight loss (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Revisional bariatric surgery is safe and effective in experienced centers. Complications (mechanical/symptomatic/nutritional) or unsatisfactory weight loss after primary bariatric procedures can be treated effectively with revision to Roux-en-y gastric bypass.

Endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal contrast studies are complementary in evaluation of weight regain after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

To assess the utility of upper endoscopy (EGD) and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies in the evaluation of weight regain after previous bariatric surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the findings of EGD and UGI studies for patients referred to our center for weight regain after bariatric surgery. All patients received a dietary assessment concomitant with the anatomic evaluations.

RESULTS

From January 2003 and March 2006, 30 patients qualified for the study (25 women and 5 men, average age 49 years). Of the 30 patients, 16 had undergone gastroplasty and 14 open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Of the 30 patients, 27 (90%) had > or =1 abnormality detected on UGI study or EGD. Of these abnormalities, 10 were gastrogastric fistulas, 8 of which were detected with both UGI study and EGD; 11 dilated pouches were diagnosed by EGD but only 2 were also diagnosed on the UGI study. An enlarged stoma size was diagnosed in 7 patients (6 by EGD and 1 on the UGI study). Also, the UGI study diagnosed 1 Roux limb and 7 esophageal abnormalities not seen on EGD, and EGD diagnosed 4 esophageal and 3 gastric abnormalities not seen on the UGI study. On the basis of these findings and the dietary evaluation, 23 patients (77%) were offered a revisional procedure.

CONCLUSION

EGD and UGI contrast studies are complementary in the evaluation of patients with weight regain after bariatric surgery. The combination of the 2 studies detected all the gastrogastric fistulas present. EGD provided more useful pouch and stomal information, and the UGI study detected esophageal or Roux limb abnormalities that frequently require additional evaluation.

Surgical approaches to obesity

Bariatric surgery has evolved considerably since the introduction of jejunoileal bypass in the 1950s. With modifications of early procedures, implementation of new techniques, and establishment of minimally invasive approaches, operative intervention has become the mainstay in the treatment of extreme (class III) obesity. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band technique is the most common purely restrictive procedure. Advantages of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band include reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to other bariatric procedures, but this procedure has been associated with substantial intermediate and long-term complications. Although vertical banded gastroplasty was associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and acceptable early weight loss, results from long-term follow-up have been discouraging. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most common bariatric procedure performed in the United States because of its effectiveness in long-term weight loss and low rates of serious complications. Modifications of RYGB to induce malabsorption have led to greater weight loss but increased risks of metabolic and nutritional sequelae. Duodenal switch is a malabsorptive procedure associated with excellent weight loss and resolution of weight-related comorbidities, but concerns regarding potential metabolic and nutritional sequelae have limited its widespread use. Laparoscopic approaches to bariatric procedures have reduced wound-related complications and improved patient recovery. However, the incidence of anastomotic leak and internal hernia is higher after laparoscopic RYGB compared to the open approach. Each of the currently available bariatric procedures has both advantages and disadvantages that must be considered in determining which operation should be selected for an individual patient.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in obese patients: the role of obesity in management

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in obese patients. The implications of obesity in the etiology, management and outcomes in treatment for GERD have become increasingly important due to an epidemic of obesity. The increasing prevalence of patients with both obesity and GERD merits evaluation of the appropriate surgical intervention for GERD and its symptoms. With the additional advantages of weight loss and resolution of weight-related morbidity (including GERD) bariatric procedures should be the procedure of choice in patients with medically complicated obesity. Patients in lower obesity classes with body mass indices (BMI) of 30-35 kg/m2 without other substantive weight-related comorbidity should prompt consideration of both fundoplication and bariatric procedures, tailoring the best approach based on the specific patient and future implications. Patients classified as overweight but not obese (BMI < 30) are likely best treated with fundoplication; however, no randomized trials comparing fundoplication with the current antireflux bariatric procedures exist.

Effect of gastric bypass on Barrett's esophagus and intestinal metaplasia of the cardia in patients with morbid obesity

Gastric bypass in patients with morbid obesity should be an excellent antireflux procedure, because no acid is produced at the small gastric pouch and no duodenal reflux is present, due to the long Roux-en-Y limb. Five hundred fifty-seven patients with morbid obesity submitted to resectional gastric bypass, and routine preoperative upper endoscopy with biopsy samples demonstrated 12 patients with Barrett's esophagus (2.1%) and three patients with intestinal metaplasia of the cardia (CIM). An endoscopic procedure was repeated twice after surgery, producing seven patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus (BE) and five patients with long-segment BE. Body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly, from 43.2 kg/m(2) to 29.4 kg/m(2) 2 years after surgery. Symptoms of reflux esophagitis, which were present in 14 of the 15 patients, disappeared in all patients 1 year after surgery. Preoperative erosive esophagitis and peptic ulcer of the esophagus healed in all patients. There was regression from intestinal metaplasia to cardiac mucosa in four patients (57%) with short-segment BE, and in one patient (20%) with long-segment BE. Two (67%) of three cases with CIM had regression to cardiac mucosa. There was no progression to low- or high-grade dysplasia. Gastric bypass in patients with Barrett's esophagus and morbid obesity is an excellent antireflux operation, proved by the disappearance of symptoms and the healing of endoscopic esophagitis or peptic ulcer in all patients, which is followed by an important regression to cardiac mucosa that is length-dependent and time-dependent.

Operative Technique for Converting a Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgeons are increasingly encountering patients with failed weight-loss operations. Conversion from vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most common revisional operation in our practice. We reviewed our experience in converting from VBG to RYGB using a basic five-step surgical technique.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed data on all patients undergoing revisional surgery for failed VBG, defined as patients with body mass index >/=35 kg/m(2), weight gain, poor control of comorbidities, staple-line dehiscence, or band-specific complications. The five basic steps include identification of the band, delineation of the extent of the pouch, division of the stomach, preparation of the Roux limb, and completion of the cardiojejunostomy.

RESULTS

We have undertaken 28 conversions from VBG to RYGB. Median age was 51 years (range 27 to 65 years), preoperative body mass index was 40 kg/m(2) (range 20 to 58 kg/m(2)), and 25 patients (89%) were women. Indications for revision were band-related complications (13 patients), staple-line disruption (9 patients), and inadequate weight loss (6 patients). Median operative time was 185 minutes (range 105 to 465 minutes), estimated blood loss was 450 mL (range 100 to 2,500 mL), postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients (21%), and length of hospitalization was 5 days (range 3 to 69 days). Median postoperative body mass index was 32 kg/m(2) (range 20 to 41 kg/m(2)) at a followup time of 16 months (range 1 to 32 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The technique described facilitates the operative approach to patients with failed VBG, providing guidelines for safe dissection and division of the gastric pouch for conversion to RYGB. Revisional bariatric operations are technically difficult and are associated with relatively higher complication rates than those reported for primary operations.

Is Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safe after previous antireflux surgery? Technical feasibility and postoperative symptom assessment

BACKGROUND

Clinically significant morbid obesity is associated with an increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Vertical Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is known to eliminate acid (and bile) in the pouch of cardia, which would provide control of reflux symptoms. The aim of our study was to assess the technical considerations, morbidity, and safety of RYGBP after previous antireflux surgery and evaluate postoperative reflux symptoms.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients undergoing RYGBP after previous antireflux surgery from three institutions. Follow-up (mean 18 months) data were obtained from medical records and by questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients (18 women and 1 man) underwent standard (n = 18) or distal (n = 1) RYGBP 8 +/- 1 years after Nissen (n = 18) or Toupet (n = 1) fundoplication. Open RYGBP was undertaken in 17 of 19 patients. No postoperative deaths occurred. Substantive complications occurred in 4 patients (21%) and included hemorrhage requiring transfusion, concomitant splenectomy, and reoperation for suspected leak in 2. Of the 19 patients, 16 returned the questionnaire, 15 of whom reported subjective improvement in reflux symptoms after RYGBP compared with after antireflux surgery. No patient in this series required medical therapy for reflux symptoms at the last follow-up visit. The body mass index decreased from 42 +/- 2 kg/m(2) to 32 +/- 2 kg/m(2) (mean +/- SEM); all patients with >or=1 year of follow-up had a body mass index of <or=32 kg/m(2). At last follow-up, 88% of patients were very satisfied subjectively with their outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

RYGBP after previous antireflux surgery is technically feasible and safe, but it is associated with greater complication rates than those seen with other forms of reoperative bariatric procedures. RYGBP results in effective weight loss, controls reflux symptoms, and may be the procedure of choice in morbidly obese patients with previous antireflux surgery, and obese patients requiring surgical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

[Evidential basis in bariatric surgery]

Bariatric surgery is currently considered the best treatment option for morbid obesity. With the rapid development of laparoscopic techniques, a significant increase in the number bariatric procedures in recent years can be observed. Various surgical techniques to treat morbid obesity have been described, but only few prospective studies compare the different procedures, leading to a lack of evidence for their use. However, from the available literature some general recommendations can be given: (a) preoperative workup in an interdisciplinary team is mandatory, (b) primary bariatric procedures should be performed laparoscopically, and (c) the combination of restrictive and malabsorptive techniques is more efficient than a purely restrictive method, which is also true for the treatment of comorbid diabetes and arterial hypertension. In this paper, we present recent developments in bariatric surgery, with special emphasis on the available evidence for the best treatment of morbidly obese patients.

Laparoscopic Revision of Bariatric Procedures: Is it Feasible?

Reoperative bariatric surgery is required in 10 per cent to 20 per cent of patients secondary to weight regain or complications of the previous procedure. This study evaluates the feasibility of performing the revision procedure laparoscopically. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing revision of a previous weight loss procedure between October 1998 and November 2003 was conducted. Demographics, indications for surgery, operative findings, and complications were reviewed. Thirty-nine revisions were performed in 37 patients. Indications for revision were failure to lose weight (22), gastric outlet stricture (10), refractory gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) (6), and blind loop syndrome (1). All 39 procedures were revised to Roux- en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), with 18 open revisions (OR) and 21 laparoscopic revisions (LR). Ten of the 21 LR (48%) were converted to an open procedure due to adhesions or unclear anatomy. Early complications requiring operation were noted in five procedures (two OR, three LR). Nine patients (seven OR, two LR) required surgery at least 3 months following their revision. One patient died (LR). The difference in body mass index (kg/m2) (BMI) pre- and post-op was 43.3 ± 9.9 versus 37.4 ± 9.2, P = 0.01 (follow-up 5 months), but no significant BMI differences between LR and OR patients were seen. Revisional bariatric surgery is associated with more complications requiring surgery early in the laparoscopic population versus more late complications in those approached open. Revisional bariatric surgery can be approached laparoscopically and with acceptable morbidity comparable to patients whose revision is approached open.

Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

BACKGROUND

The increasing prevalence of morbid obesity together with the development of laparoscopic approaches has led to a steep rise in the number of bariatric operations. These guidelines intend to define the comparative effectiveness and surrounding circumstances of the various types of obesity surgery.

METHODS

A consensus panel representing the fields of general/endoscopic surgery, nutrition and epidemiology convened to agree on specific questions in obesity surgery. Databases were systematically searched for clinical trial results in order to produce evidence-based recommendations. Following two days of discussion by the experts and a plenary discussion, the final statements were issued.

RECOMMENDATIONS

After the patient's multidisciplinary evaluation, obesity surgery should be considered in adults with a documented BMI greater than or equal to 35 and related comorbidity, or a BMI of at least 40. In addition to standard laboratory testing, chest radiography, electrocardiography, spirometry, and abdominal ultrasonography, the preoperative evaluation of obesity surgery patients also includes upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or radiologic evaluation with a barium meal. Psychiatric consultation and polysomnography can safely be restricted to patients with clinical symptoms on preoperative screening. Adjustable gastric banding (GB), vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) are all effective in the treatment of morbid obesity, but differ in degree of weight loss and range of complications. The choice of procedure therefore should be tailored to the individual situation. There is evidence that a laparoscopic approach is advantageous for LAGB, VBG, and GB (and probably also for BPD). Antibiotic and antithromboembolic prophylaxis should be used routinely. Patients should be seen 3 to 8 times during the first postoperative year, 1 to 4 times during the second year and once or twice a year thereafter. Outcome assessment after surgery should include weight loss and maintainance, nutritional status, comorbidities and quality-of-life.

Laparoscopic gastric bypass is superior to laparoscopic gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity

OBJECTIVE

To define whether laparoscopic gastric banding or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass represents the better approach to treat patients with morbid obesity.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Two techniques, laparoscopic gastric bypass or gastric banding, are currently widely used to treat morbid obesity. Since both procedures offer certain advantages, a strong controversy exists as to which operation should be proposed to these patients. Therefore, data are urgently needed to identify the best therapy.

METHODS

Since randomized trials are most likely not feasible because of the highly different invasiveness and irreversibility of these procedures, a matched-pair design of a large prospectively collected database appears to be the best method. Therefore, we used our prospective database including 678 bariatric procedures performed at our institution since 1995. A total of 103 consecutive patients with laparoscopic gastric bypass were randomly matched to 103 patients with laparoscopic gastric banding according to age, body mass index, and gender.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender, body mass index, excessive weight, fat mass, and comorbidites such as diabetes, heart disease, and hypertension. Feasibility and safety: All gastric banding procedures were performed laparoscopically, and one gastric bypass operation had to be converted to an open procedure. Mean operating time was 145 minutes for gastric banding and 190 minutes for gastric bypass (P < 0.001). Hospital stay was 3.3 days for gastric banding and 8.4 days for gastric bypass. The incidence of early postoperative complications was not significantly different, but late complications were significantly more frequent in the gastric banding group (pouch dilatation). There was no mortality in both groups. Efficiency: Body mass index decreased from 48.0 to 36.8 kg/m in the gastric banding group and from 47.8 to 31.9 kg/m in the gastric bypass group within 2 years of surgery. These differences became significant from the first postoperative month until the end of the follow-up (24 months). The gastric bypass procedure achieved a significantly better reduction of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass are feasible and safe. Pouch dilatations after gastric banding are responsible for more late complications compared with the gastric bypass. Laparoscopic gastric bypass offers a significant advantage regarding weight loss and reduction of comorbidities after surgery. Therefore, in our hands, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass appears to be the therapy of choice.

Primary care perspective on bariatric surgery

The role of primary care physicians in identifying potential candidates for bariatric surgery and providing them with long-term postoperative care is gaining rapidly in importance. With the increased use of surgical procedures as treatment options for obesity, a knowledge of bariatric surgery is essential for providing optimal care. During the past decade, the number of bariatric procedures has increased, and refinements of these procedures have made them safer and more effective. Primary care physicians should know how to Identify appropriate surgical candidates and be familiar with available procedures, aware of potential complications and benefits, and able to provide lifelong monitoring and follow-up care. Thus, the primary care physician must be informed about surgical criteria, types of procedures, outcomes, complications, and the long-term monitoring needs of these patients.

A case-match analysis of failed prior bariatric procedures converted to resectional gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Failure to lose weight or intractable symptoms after bariatric surgery presents a complex diagnostic and management challenge. The outcome of a standardized surgical approach to this problem has not been well described. Conversion of failed bariatric procedures to a resectional gastric bypass (RGB) can achieve symptomatic relief and acceptable weight loss.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients in a prospectively maintained database who underwent reoperative bariatric surgery over a 4-year period. Reoperative patients (RO) were case-matched (by age, body mass index, and comorbidities) in a 1:2 ratio with control patients undergoing an initial bariatric procedure (IN).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven reoperative patients and 54 case-matched control patients were identified. Mean body mass index was 42 in the RO group versus 45 in the IN group (P = not significant). Indications for conversion were weight gain (89%), dysphagia/emesis (30%), esophagitis (19%), and marginal ulcer (7%). All patients in both groups underwent RGB (subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-Y gastrojejunostomy). Compared with IN patients, the RO patients had significantly longer operative times (420 versus 268 minutes), greater blood loss (650 versus 315 cc), longer time to oral intake (3.1 versus 2.2 days), and longer hospital stays (6.5 versus 4.7 days), all P <0.01. There were no deaths or anastomotic leaks in either group. Excess body weight lost at 6 months was 46% for RO versus 54% for IN (P = 0.02). One-year excess weight lost was 71% for RO versus 77% for IN (P = not significant). All RO patients achieved symptomatic relief, and no patient required further bariatric revision. There was significant improvement in weight-related comorbidity in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion of failed bariatric procedures to RGB, although technically demanding, resulted in relief of presenting symptoms, significant 6-month and 1-year weight loss, and improvement of major comorbidities. Conversion of failed bariatric procedures to resectional gastric bypass can achieve results comparable with those of patients undergoing an initial bariatric procedure.

Surgical revision after failure of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

BACKGROUND

This paper reports the outcome of surgical revision for complications following laparoscopic placement of an adjustable silicone gastric band (AGB) to treat morbid obesity.

METHODS

Seventy-three (19.1 per cent) of 382 patients who underwent laparoscopic AGB placement between January 1996 and March 2001 presented with complications within 6 years after operation. Revision was carried out with the intention of reinstating the functional device in all patients.

RESULTS

Successful surgical revision or gradual balloon deflation was performed in 53 patients (29 port-related complications, 14 pouch dilatations, 12 band leakages, three oesophageal dilatations, two symptomatic hernias, one late migration, one intracerebral bleed). Of these patients, 51 (96.2 per cent) had a successful outcome according to the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System following significant additional postinterventional weight loss. AGB removal was carried out in 20 patients (13 early or late migrations, five pouch dilatations, three port-related complications, two psychiatric disorders, one band leakage). The final failure rate for complicated AGB procedures was 30.1 per cent.

CONCLUSION

AGB placement is associated with a variety of complications. In most cases surgical complications can be treated with minimally invasive surgery, which should allow further weight loss and improvement of quality of life during long-term follow-up. Alternative bariatric procedures should be reserved for patients with poor outcome after surgical revision of the AGB.

Comparison of objective outcomes following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in the morbidly obese with heartburn

BACKGROUND

Heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects approximately 25-50% of morbidly obese patients. Although objective physiologic testing has been reported extensively in patients following Nissen fundoplication, there are no previous reports of such testing in morbidly obese patients. A life-saving surgical alternative for the morbidly obese patient is gastric bypass surgery, which usually improves heartburn symptoms in addition to many serious health conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea. We hypothesized that, in morbidly obese patients, gastric bypass surgery would be as effective as Nissen fundoplication in reducing both heartburn symptoms and esophageal acid exposure, as reflected by the DeMeester score.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2000, all patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LN) and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) in our practice underwent preoperative and postoperative esophageal physiologic testing. Patients were included in this study that were morbidly obese and had significant heartburn symptoms or objective evidence of acid reflux, and had repeat esophageal physiologic testing after either LN or LGB. Data were obtained through retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

RESULTS

Twelve patients met the inclusion criteria: six patients who had LN and six who had LGB. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 55 kg/m2 in the LGB group and 39.8 in the LN group. After surgery, the mean DeMeester score decreased from 64.3 to 2.8 in the LN group ( p = 0.01) and from 34.7 to 5.7 in the LGB group ( p = 0.1). Both groups' mean postoperative DeMeester scores were normal after surgery, and there was no significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.3). Both groups experienced a significant improvement in heartburn symptoms postoperatively. The mean preoperative symptom score improved from 3.5 to 0.5 in the LN group ( p = 0.01) and from 2.2 to 0.2 in the LGB group ( p = 0.003). There was no difference in the mean postoperative symptom scores between the groups ( p = 0.35). After surgery, mean LES resting pressures increased from 12.9 to 35.5 ( p = 0.003) in the LN group and from 23.6 to 29.7 ( p = 0.45) in the LGB group. There were no complications in either group.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study show that laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication are both effective in treating heartburn symptoms and objective acid reflux in morbidly obese patients. The health benefits of weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass should make this operation the procedure of choice in the morbidly obese patient with heartburn.

Symptomatic improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) on symptomatic control of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Morbidly obese patients (n = 435) who underwent LRYGBP for morbid obesity were assessed for changes in GERD symptoms, quality of life, and patient satisfaction after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients (55%) had evidence of chronic GERD, and 152 patients (64%) voluntarily participated in the study. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 48 kg/m2. The mean excess weight loss was 68.8% at 12 months. There was a significant decrease in GERD-related symptoms, including heartburn (from 87% to 22%, p<0.001); water brash (from 18% to 7%, p<0.05); wheezing (from 40% to 5%, p<0.001) laryngitis (from 17% to 7%, p<0.05); and aspiration (from 14% to 2%, p<0.01) following LRYGBP. Postoperatively, the use of medication decreased significantly both for proton pump inhibitors (from 44% to 9%, p<0.001) and for the H2 blockers (from 60% to 10%, p<0.01). SF-36 physical function scores and the mental component summary scores improved after the operation (87 vs 71; p<0.05 and 83 vs 66; p<0.05, respectively). Overall patient satisfaction was 97%.

CONCLUSION

LRYGBP results in very good control of GERD in morbidly obese patients with follow-up as late as 3 years. Morbidly obese patients who require surgery for GERD may be better served by LRYGBP than fundoplication because of the additional benefit of significant weight loss.