Pathological-radiological correlations: pathological and radiological correlation of endobronchial neoplasms: part II, malignant tumors

Malignant and Benign Tracheobronchial Neoplasms: Comprehensive Review with Radiologic, Bronchoscopic, and Pathologic Correlation

Tracheobronchial neoplasms are much less common than lung parenchymal neoplasms but can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. They include a broad differential of both malignant and benign entities, extending far beyond more commonly known pathologic conditions such as squamous cell carcinoma and carcinoid tumor. Airway lesions may be incidental findings at imaging or manifest with symptoms related to airway narrowing or mucosal irritation, invasion of adjacent structures, or distant metastatic disease. While there is considerable overlap in clinical manifestation, imaging features, and bronchoscopic appearances, an awareness of potential distinguishing factors may help narrow the differential diagnosis. The authors review the epidemiology, imaging characteristics, typical anatomic distributions, bronchoscopic appearances, and histopathologic findings of a wide range of neoplastic entities involving the tracheobronchial tree. Malignant neoplasms discussed include squamous cell carcinoma, malignant salivary gland tumors (adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma), carcinoid tumor, sarcomas, primary tracheobronchial lymphoma, and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Benign neoplasms discussed include hamartoma, chondroma, lipoma, papilloma, amyloidoma, leiomyoma, neurogenic lesions, and benign salivary gland tumors (pleomorphic adenoma and mucous gland adenoma). Familiarity with the range of potential entities and any distinguishing features should prove valuable to thoracic radiologists, pulmonologists, and cardiothoracic surgeons when encountering the myriad of tracheobronchial neoplasms in clinical practice. Attention is paid to any features that may help render a more specific diagnosis before pathologic confirmation. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Clinical, radiological and histopathological profile of patients with endobronchial lesions on fibreoptic bronchoscopy

Various pulmonary diseases, both benign as well as malignant, manifest in the form of endobronchial lesions on bronchoscopy. Malignancy is frequently the provisional diagnosis in the mind of a chest physician undergoing an endobronchial biopsy. Other benign diseases, however, may present similarly on bronchoscopy and computerized tomography (CT) scan. This observational study was conducted to better understand why there is such a wide range of endobronchial lesions with even more diverse radiological and pathological presentations. The research was carried out at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Science (HIMS), Swami Ram Nagar, Dehradun. Subjects were recruited from HIMS, Dehradun patients over a 12-month period (August 2020 to July 2021). The study included patients (over the age of 18) who had a fibreoptic bronchoscopy and were found to have an endobronchial lesion. After a thorough history, examination, and application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 120 patients were enrolled. The majority of patients were between the ages of 56 and 65, with males outnumbering females. The majority of the patients were smokers, and the most common complaint was shortness of breath. Poorly differentiated carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were the most common endobronchial lesions in men, while small cell carcinoma was the most common in women. A mass lesion was the most common radiological finding, followed by mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and an exophytic lesion was the most common endobronchial lesion detected in bronchoscopy. We looked at the diseases that cause endobronchial lesions and their clinico-radiological and histopathological profiles. This study clearly demonstrates the importance of studying the histopathological profiles of patients with endobronchial growth, which can mimic malignancy in rare cases.

Benign Endobronchial Tumors: A Clinicopathologic Review

Purpose: Benign endobronchial tumors are rare entities that can be difficult to diagnose because they often present with non-specific symptoms and vague radiographic findings. The current study reviews the clinical, radiologic and pathologic features, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with benign endobronchial tumors. Methods: We examined the charts of all patients who presented with biopsy-proven benign endobronchial tumors at a tertiary-care academic medical center between 1993 and 2018. Pertinent clinicopathologic and radiologic data were analyzed, with particular attention paid to treatment modalities and mean overall patient survival. Results: A total of 28 cases were identified. The most common benign neoplasm was hamartoma (37%), followed by lipoma (19%), squamous papilloma (11%), pleomorphic adenoma (7%), mucin gland adenoma (7%), papillary adenoma (3%), hemangioma (3%), neurofibroma (3%), leiomyoma (3%), and papillomatosis (3%). Cough (58%), shortness of breath (44%), and hemoptysis (15%) were the most frequent presentations. Most cases demonstrated well-defined submucosal or pedunculated endobronchial lesions with segmental pneumonia or atelectasis on imaging. Histologic diagnosis was obtained by endobronchial resection in 43% of patients, thoracoscopic lobectomy in 36%, endobronchial biopsy in 18%, and thoracoscopic wedge resections in 3%. All procedures were performed with no intraoperative or in-hospital deaths (mean overall survival: 20.2 years). Conclusion: Benign endobronchial tumors typically present as well-defined submucosal and/or pedunculated lesions, and may lead to post-obstructive complications. Endobronchial resection is the preferred strategy for diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.

Outcomes of patients with a non-diagnostic initial bronchoscopy for suspected thoracic malignancy

Lung cancer is 1 of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths and bronchoscopy is an essential tool for the diagnosis. The diagnostic yield varies based on the characteristics of the lesion and bronchoscopic techniques employed. There is limited data regarding outcomes of patients suspected of thoracic malignancies with a non-diagnostic initial bronchoscopy. The goal of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with a non-diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected thoracic malignancies and to evaluate variables predictive of a diagnostic bronchoscopy.Retrospective analysis of adult patients at BronxCare Hospital Center who underwent bronchoscopy for suspected thoracic malignancy. The study period was January 2012 to February 2019. Exclusion criteria included patients who underwent only inspection bronchoscopy or bronchoalveolar lavage as the diagnostic yield for malignancy with these techniques is low. All other bronchoscopic procedures were included that is, endobronchial biopsies, transbronchial biopsies, and endobronchial ultrasound guided-transbronchial needle aspiration. Bronchoscopy was considered diagnostic when a specific histopathological diagnosis was established.311 patients underwent bronchoscopy to rule out malignancy. A diagnosis was obtained in 153 (49.2%) patients, 81 (52.9%) had primary lung cancer and 14 (9.15%) other malignancies. 158 (50.8%) patients had initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy; 86 (54.43%) were lost to follow up. Of the remaining 72 (45.57%) patients, radiological resolution or stability was observed in 51 (70.8%) patients. Primary lung cancer was found in 13 (18.05%) patients and other malignancies in 5 (6.94%). Predictive of a diagnostic bronchoscopy was the performance of endobronchial biopsies and endobronchial ultrasound guided-transbronchial needle aspiration.This study highlights some of the barriers to the timely diagnosis of thoracic malignancies. Following patients with a non-diagnostic procedure as well as all those patients with diagnosed malignancies it of the utmost importance. In patients available for follow up, close to 25% of additional cases with treatable malignancy could be identified and patients diagnosed with cancer could receive timely treatment.

Diagnostic performance of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in patients with mediastinal and coexistent endobronchial or peripheral lesions

To compare the performance of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with conventional endobronchial biopsy (EBB) or transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) in patients with mediastinal, and coexisting endobronchial or peripheral lesions.Retrospective review of records of patients undergoing diagnostic EBUS-TBNA and conventional bronchoscopy in 2014.A total of 74 patients had mediastinal, and coexisting endobronchial or peripheral lesions. The detection rate of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lesion >1 cm in short axis, EBB for visible exophytic type of endobronchial lesion, and TBLB for peripheral lesion with bronchus sign were 71%, 75%, and 86%, respectively. In contrast, the detection rate of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lesion ≤1 cm in short axis, EBB for mucosal hyperemia type of endobronchial lesion, and TBLB for peripheral lesion without bronchus sign were 25%, 63%, and 38%, and improved to 63%, 88%, and 62% respectively by adding EBB or TBLB to EBUS-TBNA, and EBUS-TBNA to EBB or TBLB. Postprocedure bleeding was significantly more common in patients undergoing EBB and TBLB 8 (40%) versus convex probe EBUS-TBNA 2 patients (2.7%, P = 0.0004).EBUS-TBNA is a safer single diagnostic technique compared with EBB or TBLB in patients with mediastinal lesion of >1 cm in size, and coexisting exophytic type of endobronchial lesion, or peripheral lesion with bronchus sign. However, it requires combining with EBB or TBLB and vice versa to optimize yield when mediastinal lesion is ≤1 cm in size, and coexisting endobronchial and peripheral lesions lack exophytic nature, and bronchus sign, respectively.

Tracheobronchial tumors

Tumors of trachea and bronchi are uncommon and can occur in the form of benign or low- and high-grade malignant tumors. Although tracheobronchial tumors (TBTs) represent only 0.6% of all pulmonary tumors, they are clinically significant. Delays in diagnosis of these tumors commonly occur because the signs and symptoms caused by these tumors are nonspecific and chest radiographs are often considered unremarkable. Therefore, novel radiological techniques and better access to flexible bronchoscopy enable detection of larger number of TBT. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of tracheal and bronchial tumors and discuss significant aspects of the different TBT with focus on clinical manifestations and diagnostic procedures.

Computed tomography correlation of airway disease with bronchoscopy--part II: tracheal neoplasms

This pictorial essay illustrates, describes, and correlates computed tomographic findings of tracheal neoplasms with fiberoptic bronchoscopy findings. Corresponding computed tomography (CT) and bronchoscopy findings of common primary tracheal neoplasms; squamous cell papilloma, papillomatosis, squamous cell carcinoma, adenoid cystic adenoma, non-Hodgkin׳s lymphoma, and a secondary malignant neoplasm of the trachea; and renal cell carcinoma were correlated.

Surgical approaches of endobronchial neoplasms

Endobronchial tumors are a rare entity that presents with different pathological findings. The interventional pulmonologist, but also the thoracic surgeon have at their disposal the same techniques for diagnosis, however; the two modalities differentiate in the treatment approach. Diagnosis evaluation should include lymph node evaluation. Minimal invasive techniques under local or general anesthesia are usually preferred by the interventional pulmonologists, whereas in the surgical approach of the thoracic surgeons the general anesthesia is necessary. A more extensive surgical approach either lobotomy or pneumonectomy should be performed in cases with positive intrapulmonary lymph nodes. Carinal reconstruction should be performed skillfully to get a negative proximal margin whenever needed. In the current manuscript we will present the methods of patient evaluation and surgical techniques for the management of these lesions.

Usefulness of FDG PET/CT in determining benign from malignant endobronchial obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of FDG PET/CT to differentiate malignant endobronchial lesions with distal atelectasis from benign bronchial stenosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 84 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT and then PET/CT and had histological (n = 81) or follow-up imaging (n = 3) confirmation. Two chest radiologists reviewed initial chest CT and determined endobronchial lesions to be malignant or benign. Two nuclear medicine physicians reviewed PET/CT for FDG uptake at the obstruction site and measured SUV. Malignancy was considered when increased FDG uptake was seen in the obstruction site, regardless of FDG within the atelectatic lung.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of chest CT was 95%, 48% and 84%, compared with 95%, 91% and 94% for PET/CT. Benign obstructive lesions showed statistically lower FDG uptake than malignant obstructions (benign SUV 2.5 ± 0.84; malignant SUV 11.8 ± 5.95, p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed an SUV cut-off value of 3.4 with highest sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 91%.

CONCLUSION

Increased FDG PET/CT uptake at the obstruction site indicates a high probability of malignancy, while benign lesions show low FDG uptake. Careful evaluation of FDG uptake pattern at the obstruction site is helpful in the differentiation between benign and malignant endobronchial lesions.

Flexible bronchoscopy and its role in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer

Technologic advances in bronchoscopy continue to improve the ability to perform minimally invasive, accurate evaluations of the tracheobronchial tree and to perform an ever-increasing array of diagnostic, staging, therapeutic, and palliative interventions. The role of both old and new diagnostic bronchoscopy will continue to evolve as further improvements are made in bronchoscopes, accessory equipment, and imaging technologies. The major challenge is the adoption of the many new bronchoscopic techniques into routine clinical practice. There is a need for well-designed studies to delineate the appropriate use of these interventions and to better define their limitations and cost effectiveness.

Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: The Expanding Spectrum of Histologic Variants

Pulmonary adenocarcinoma is one of the most common types of lung cancer. Traditionally, adenocarcinomas have been divided based on their degree of resemblance to their parent tissues into 3 histopathologic types: well, moderately, and poorly differentiated. In the majority of cases, this schema is sufficient to categorize these lung tumors. However, there is a considerable group of tumors in which the histology is not that of the classic gland-forming neoplasm. Thus, although the terminology of adenocarcinoma is applied in such cases, the histopathologic features are different from those of the more conventional variants. The current review addresses these unusual variants and the importance of recognizing and properly categorizing them to avoid unnecessary additional workup or possible misdiagnosis.