3008 ORAL Acute adverse events in a randomised trial of short course versus long course preoperative radiotherapy for T3 adenocarcinoma of rectum: a Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial (TROG 01.04)

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients: results and prognostic factors

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of preoperative short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients.

Methods

The study group comprised 210 patients with pathologically proven resectable rectal cancer. Between 2001 and 2013, they were treated preoperatively with short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy delivered in five fractions), followed by total mesorectal excision. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy was administered at the discretion of the treating physician, depending on the pathological stage.

Results

After a median follow-up of 57 months, the following 5-year survival rates were observed: overall survival-66.4%, disease-free survival-67.2%, locoregional relapse-free survival-91.7%, and distant metastases-free survival-71.5%. The local failure was observed in 15 patients. Ten patients (4.8%) achieved pathologic complete response. The multivariate analysis demonstrated the regional lymph node involvement to be statistically significant for unfavorable outcomes in terms of all estimated survival rates. Lymphovascular invasion was found to be a strong predictor of survival (HR = 1.68; 95% CI 1.29-3.55) and treatment failure (HR = 1.54; 95% CI 1.08-3.34). The presence of positive surgical circumferential margin was related to six times higher risk of locoregional recurrence. Early and late severe treatment-induced toxicity was reported in 1 and 7.6% patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy allows to achieve excellent local control and favorable survival rates. The treatment-induced toxicity is acceptable.

Results of short term radiotherapy followed by radical surgery for rectal cancer: A long-term unicenter observational study

INTRODUCTION

Short-term radiotherapy (STR) for rectal cancer (RC) has rarely been used in Spain. The aim of the present study is to describe oncological results after RTC and surgery for RC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients treated with STR and surgery for RC (1999-2012). Epidemiological data, staging, complications of STR, STR-surgery interval, surgical approach, rate of anastomotic/perineal wound dehiscence, and pathological data (regression degree and staging) were collected. Global survival, disease free survival, local recurrence rate and incidence of toxicity, response and complications of combined treatment are reported.

RESULTS

Of 1229 patients treated, 209 patients received STR and surgery. The median follow-up was 6.2 years. Mean age was 68 years and 66% of the patients were men. A total of 88% were cT3-4 and 44% cN+17 (8.1%) patients had resectable synchronous metastases. Acute and chronic toxicity due to STR was <5%. In 75% of the cases the STR-surgery interval was <15 days, and in 9%> 4 weeks. Seven patients (3.3%) presented complete response. Nine (4.3%) patients presented an local recurrence rate. Global survival at 5, 10 and 15 years was 67.8, 49.2 and 37.5%, respectively. Disease free survival at 5, 10 and 15 years was 66.1, 47.1 and 33%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results compare favorably with multicentric historical series. STR offers certain advantages that could be increased by increasing the STR-surgery interval and/or interspersed with sequential chemotherapy.

Early and late toxicity of radiotherapy for rectal cancer

With the implementation of total mesorectal excision surgery and neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy, the outcome of rectal cancer patients has improved and a substantial proportion of them have become long-term survivors. These advances come at the expense of radiation- and chemotherapy-related toxicity which remains an underestimated problem. Radiation-induced early toxicity in rectal cancer treatment mainly includes diarrhea, cystitis, and perineal dermatitis, while bowel dysfunction, fecal incontinence, bleeding, and perforation, genitourinary dysfunction, and pelvic fractures constitute the majority of late toxicity. It is now generally accepted that short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and immediate surgery is associated with less early toxicity compared to conventionally fractionated chemoradiotherapy with delayed surgery. There are no significant differences in late toxicity between both treatment regimens. While there is hardly an increase in early toxicity after preoperative SCRT with immediate surgery, late toxicity is substantial compared to surgery alone. Early toxicity is more frequent when a longer interval between SCRT and surgery is used and is comparable to the toxicity observed with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy except that it occurs after the end of the radiotherapy. So far, randomized phase III trials failed to demonstrate a substantial gain in tumoural response when oxaliplatin or molecular agents are added to the multimodality treatment. Moreover, the addition of these drugs increases toxicity and remains therefore experimental.

Pre-operative chemoradiation for non-metastatic locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This review sets out to assess the efficacy of pre-operative chemoradiation when compared to radiotherapy alone before surgery in the treatment of advanced non metastatic rectal surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of pre-operative chemoradiation (CRT) compared with radiation (RT) alone, in locally advanced rectal cancer with respect to overall survival, local recurrence and 30 day mortality, sphincter preservation and toxicity of treatment (both acute and late).

SEARCH METHODS

In September 2011, we searched clinical trial registers, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, EMBASE and MEDLINE and reviewed reference lists. Further hand searches were conducted of relevant journal proceedings. No language constraints were applied.The following search terms were used: colorectal, rectal, rectum, cancer, carcinoma, tumour, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, chemoradiation, 5-Fluorouracil, 5-FU, neo-adjuvant, preoperative, surgery, anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, total mesorectal excision.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Male and female patients aged over 18 years undergoing preoperative chemoradiation or radiotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced non-metastatic rectal cancer. There was no upper age limit for participants. Locally advanced non-metastatic cancer was defined as stage 3 rectal tumours. These are tumours of any T stage with nodal involvement, without evidence of distant metastases.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcome parameters included overall survival and local recurrence rate. Secondary outcome parameters included 30 day mortality, sphincter preservation, pathological response of tumour, acute and late toxicity of treatment. The outcome parameters were summarized using the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

There were 6 randomised controlled trials eligible for inclusion. A reduction in local recurrence was seen in the CRT group in comparison to the RT group (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.75, P<0.0001). The results for overall survival were (OR=1.01 95%CI 0.85-1.20, P=0.88).The 30 day mortality was the same for both groups, CRT vs RT (OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.88-3.38). Sphincter preservation (stoma rate) was also similar for the two interventions (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85-1.21, P=0.64). An increase in acute grade 3/4 treatment related toxicity was seen in the CRT group versus the RT group (OR 3.96, 95% CI 3.03, 5.17, P<0.00001), although this result did display heterogeneity P=0.0005. Late toxicity events were similar between the two groups (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.50, 1.54, P=0.65).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

RT was compared to the more intensive CRT in the treatment of T3-4, node positive (locally advanced) rectal cancer. While there was no difference in overall survival between RT and CRT, CRT was associated with less local recurrence.

Point: short-course radiation therapy is preferable in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer

There are 2 types of neoadjuvant radiation regimens accepted as standard for resectable rectal cancer: short-course (5 × 5 Gy) radiation therapy alone with immediate surgery and long-course combined chemoradiation therapy with delayed surgery. A Polish randomized study (n = 312) and an Australian randomized study (n = 326) compared these 2 schedules. Both trials showed a lower rate of early adverse effects using a short-course radiation regimen and no differences in long-term oncologic outcomes and late toxicity rates between groups. The small number of fractions makes short-course radiation less expensive and more convenient than chemoradiation therapy. These facts indicate that short-course radiation is preferable to chemoradiation for resectable cancers. Additionally, short-course preoperative radiation with a long interval to surgery is a valuable option for patients unfit for chemotherapy, with unresectable cancer or with a small tumor that is amenable to local excision. Moreover, short-course radiation enables the intensification of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic rectal cancer with potentially resectable synchronous metastatic disease.

Interim analysis of the Stockholm III trial of preoperative radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To address issues regarding the fractionation of radiotherapy (RT) and timing of surgery for rectal cancer, a multicentre trial has randomized patients to preoperative short-course RT with two different intervals to surgery, or long-course RT with delayed surgery. The present interim analysis assessed feasibility, compliance and complications after RT and surgery.

METHODS

Some 303 patients were randomized to either short-course RT (5 x 5 Gy) and surgery within 1 week (group 1), short-course RT and surgery after 4-8 weeks (group 2) or long-course RT (25 x 2 Gy) and surgery after 4-8 weeks (group 3).

RESULTS

Demographic data were similar between groups and there were few protocol violations (5.0-6 per cent). Eight patients (2.6 per cent) developed radiation-induced acute toxicity. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between groups (46.6, 40.0 and 32 per cent in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively; P = 0.164). Patients receiving short-course RT with surgery 11-17 days after the start of RT had the highest complication rate (24 of 37).

CONCLUSION

Compliance was acceptable and severe acute toxicity was low, irrespective of fractionation. Short-course RT with immediate surgery had a tendency towards more postoperative complications, but only if surgery was delayed beyond 10 days after the start of RT.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00904813 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).