The empty pelvis syndrome: a core data set from the PelvEx collaborative

BACKGROUND

Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration (PE), but is undefined. EPS outcome reporting and descriptors of radicality of PE are inconsistent; therefore, the best approaches for prevention are unknown. To facilitate future research into EPS, the aim of this study is to define a measurable core outcome set, core descriptor set and written definition for EPS. Consensus on strategies to mitigate EPS was also explored.

METHOD

Three-stage consensus methodology was used: longlisting with systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient engagement, and Delphi-piloting; shortlisting with two rounds of modified Delphi; and a confirmatory stage using a modified nominal group technique. This included a selection of measurement instruments, and iterative generation of a written EPS definition.

RESULTS

One hundred and three and 119 participants took part in the modified Delphi and consensus meetings, respectively. This encompassed international patient and healthcare professional representation with multidisciplinary input. Seventy statements were longlisted, seven core outcomes (bowel obstruction, enteroperineal fistula, chronic perineal sinus, infected pelvic collection, bowel obstruction, morbidity from reconstruction, re-intervention, and quality of life), and four core descriptors (magnitude of surgery, radiotherapy-induced damage, methods of reconstruction, and changes in volume of pelvic dead space) reached consensus-where applicable, measurement of these outcomes and descriptors was defined. A written definition for EPS was agreed.

CONCLUSIONS

EPS is an area of unmet research and clinical need. This study provides an agreed definition and core data set for EPS to facilitate further research.

Minimum standards of pelvic exenterative practice: PelvEx Collaborative guideline

This document outlines the important aspects of caring for patients who have been diagnosed with advanced pelvic cancer. It is primarily aimed at those who are establishing a service that adequately caters to this patient group. The relevant literature has been summarized and an attempt made to simplify the approach to management of these complex cases.

National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes

Background

The timing and degree of implementation of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer vary among countries. Insights in national differences regarding implementation of new surgical techniques and the effect on postoperative outcomes are important for quality assurance, can show potential areas for country-specific improvement, and might be illustrative and supportive for similar implementation programs in other countries. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate differences in patient selection, applied techniques, and results of minimal invasive surgery for colorectal cancer between the Netherlands and Sweden.

Methods

Patients who underwent elective minimally invasive surgery for T1-3 colon or rectal cancer (2012–2018) registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit or Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry were included. Time trends in the application of MIS were determined. Outcomes were compared for time periods with a similar level of MIS implementation (Netherlands 2012–2013 versus Sweden 2017–2018). Multilevel analyses were performed to identify factors associated with adverse short-term outcomes.

Results

A total of 46,095 Dutch and 8,819 Swedish patients undergoing MIS for colorectal cancer were included. In Sweden, MIS implementation was approximately 5 years later than in the Netherlands, with more robotic surgery and lower volumes per hospital. Although conversion rates were higher in Sweden, oncological and surgical outcomes were comparable. MIS in the Netherlands for the years 2012–2013 resulted in a higher reoperation rate for colon cancer and a higher readmission rate but lower non-surgical complication rates for rectal cancer if compared with MIS in Sweden during 2017–2018.

Conclusion

This study showed that the implementation of MIS for colorectal cancer occurred later in Sweden than the Netherlands, with comparable outcomes despite lower volumes. Our study demonstrates that new surgical techniques can be implemented at a national level in a controlled and safe way, with thorough quality assurance.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1.

Effect of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer on spermatogenesis

In this study, preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer was found to result in a dose-dependent impairment of spermatogenesis and Sertoli cell function, reflected both by decreased sperm count and characteristic changes in hormonal response, with signs of partial recovery between 12 and 24 months after surgery. Decreased semen volume was also observed, indicating ejaculatory tract dysfunction, that seemed to be longer-lasting and not related to testicular dose. This threatens fertility in men treated for rectal cancer, and suggests that pretreatment cryopreservation and anticonception after treatment should be discussed individually.

Improvement of the experience of colorectal cancer patients in Sweden with a regional cancer plan

AIM

The Stockholm-Gotland Regional Cancer Plan was launched in 2012 to improve cancer care. A personal contact nurse (CN), an individual written care plan (IWCP) and a standardized care pathway (SCP) were introduced. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether these efforts have resulted in an improved experience for patients treated for colorectal cancer.

METHOD

Patients treated with bowel resection for colorectal cancer in the Stockholm-Gotland region between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017 were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Six to eight months postoperatively, the patients received a patient-reported experience questionnaire. Patients were classified as 'satisfied' or 'not satisfied'.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sent to 4465 patients, and 3154 (70.64%) responded. The proportion of patients assigned a CN increased over time (79.84%-88.44%) and so did the proportion of patients receiving an IWCP (39.36%-70.00%). The waiting times were significantly shortened during the study period. In multivariable analysis, access to a CN and an IWCP was independently associated with increased patient satisfaction (OR 3.03, 95% CI 2.28-4.02 and OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.38-1.94). Patients with a long waiting time were significantly less satisfied than patients with a short waiting time (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.88).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a CN, IWCP and SCP has been successful, measured by a higher proportion of patients gaining access to these assets and shortened waiting times. This has led to an improved patient experience in patients treated for colorectal cancer in the Stockholm-Gotland region.

Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection for primary rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: results from the PelvEx Collaborative

AIM

At presentation, 15-20% of patients with rectal cancer already have synchronous liver metastases. The aim of this study was to determine the surgical and survival outcomes in patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent combined pelvic exenteration and liver (oligometastatic) resection.

METHOD

Data from 20 international institutions that performed simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection between 2007 and 2017 were accumulated. Primarily, we examined perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality. We also assessed the impact that margin status had on survival.

RESULTS

Of 128 patients, 72 (56.2%) were men with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR) 15 years]. The median size of the liver oligometastatic deposits was 2 cm (IQR 1.8 cm). The median duration of surgery was 406 min (IQR 240 min), with a median blood loss of 1090 ml (IQR 2010 ml). A negative resection margin (R0 resection) was achieved in 73.5% of pelvic exenterations and 66.4% of liver resections. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.6%, and 32% of patients had a major postoperative complication. The 5-year overall survival for patients in whom an R0 resection of both primary and metastatic disease was achieved was 54.6% compared with 20% for those with an R1/R2 resection (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection is feasible, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous resection should only be performed where an R0 resection of both pelvic and hepatic disease is anticipated.

Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer among the younger population in Sweden

Background

The incidence of colorectal cancer in patients aged less than 50 years is increasing in Western countries. This population‐based study investigated the age‐ and sex‐specific incidence of colorectal cancer over time in Sweden, and characterized trends in tumour localization and stage at diagnosis.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1970 and 2016 were identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry, and categorized by sex, age and tumour location. The incidence and average annual percentage change (AAPC) were estimated and compared between age groups.

Results

There was an overall increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer between 1970 and 2006, but a decrease in 2006–2016 (AAPC −0·55 (95 per cent c.i. −1·02 to −0·07) per cent). The largest increase in colonic cancer was in 1995–2005 in women aged less than 50 years (AAPC 2·30 (0·09 to 4·56) per cent versus 0·04 (−1·35 to 1·44) and − 0·67 (−1·62 to 0·28) per cent in women aged 50–74 and 75 years or more respectively). Since 1990, rectal cancer increased in patients of both sexes aged below 50 years, with higher AAPC values in women (2006–2016: 2·01 (−1·46 to 5·61) per cent versus 0·20 (−2·25 to 2·71) per cent in men). Younger patients were more likely than those aged 50–74 and 75 years or more to present with stage III–IV colonic (66·2, 57·6 and 49·6 per cent respectively) and rectal (61·2, 54·3 and 51·3 per cent) cancer. From the mid 1990s, rates of proximal and distal colorectal cancer, and rectal cancer were increased in patients aged less than 50 years.

Conclusion

The overall incidence of colorectal cancer in Sweden decreased in the past decade. However, in patients under 50 years of age the incidence of colorectal cancer – proximal, distal and rectal – continued to increase over time.

Family history of colorectal cancer and survival: a Swedish population-based study

OBJECTIVES

A family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) is an established risk factor for developing CRC, whilst the impact of family history on prognosis is unclear. The present study assessed the association between family history and prognosis and, based on current evidence, explored whether this association was modified by age at diagnosis.

METHODS

Using data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) linked with the Multigeneration Register and the National Cancer Register, we identified 31 801 patients with a CRC diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. The SCRCR is a clinically rich database which includes information on the cancer stage, grade, location, treatment, complications and postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

We estimated excess mortality rate ratios (EMRR) for relative survival and hazard ratios (HR) for disease-free survival with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using flexible parametric models. We found no association between family history and relative survival (EMRR = 0.96, 95% CIs: 0.89-1.03, P = 0.21) or disease-free survival (HR = 0.98, 95% CIs: 0.91-1.06, P = 0.64). However, age was found to modify the impact of family history on prognosis. Young patients (<50 at diagnosis) with a positive family history had less advanced (i.e. stages I and II) cancers than those with no family history (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.89, P = 0.004) and lower excess mortality even after adjusting for cancer stage (EMMR = 0.63, 95% CIs: 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that young individuals with a family history of CRC may have greater health awareness, attend opportunistic screening and adopt lifestyle changes, leading to earlier diagnosis and better prognosis.

International evaluation of circumferential resection margins after rectal cancer resection: insights from the Swedish and Dutch audits

AIM

This study aimed to determine predictive factors for the circumferential resection margin (CRM) within two northern European countries with supposed similarity in providing rectal cancer care.

METHOD

Data for all patients undergoing rectal resection for clinical tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage I-III rectal cancer were extracted from the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry and the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2011-2015). Separate analyses were performed for cT1-3 and cT4 stage. Predictive factors for the CRM were determined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 6444 Swedish and 12 089 Dutch patients were analysed. Over time the number of hospitals treating rectal cancer decreased from 52 to 42 in Sweden, and 82 to 79 in the Netherlands. In the Swedish population, proportions of cT4 stage (17% vs 8%), multivisceral resection (14% vs 7%) and abdominoperineal excision (APR) (37% vs 31%) were higher. The overall proportion of patients with a positive CRM (CRM+) was 7.8% in Sweden and 5.4% in the Netherlands. In both populations with cT1-3 stage disease, common independent risk factors for CRM+ were cT3, APR and multivisceral resection. No common risk factors for CRM+ in cT4 stage disease were found. An independent impact of hospital volume on CRM+ could be demonstrated for the cT1-3 Dutch population.

CONCLUSION

Within two northern European countries with implemented clinical auditing, rectal cancer care might potentially be improved by further optimizing the treatment of distal and locally advanced rectal cancer.

Population-based analysis of outcomes with early-age colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim was to evaluate differences in stage, treatment and prognosis in patients aged less than 50 years with colorectal cancer compared with older age groups.

METHODS

This population-based study included all patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Sweden, 2010-2015. Disease stage, treatment, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and relative survival were analysed in relation to age groups: less than 50, 50-74 and at least 75 years.

RESULTS

Of 34 434 patients included, 24·1, 19·7 and 14·0 per cent of patients aged less than 50, 50-74 and at least 75 years respectively were diagnosed with stage IV disease (P < 0·001). Adverse histopathological features were more common in young patients. Among patients aged less than 50 years, adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 18·9, 42·0 and 93·9 per cent of those with stage I, III and III disease respectively, compared with 0·7, 4·4 and 29·6 per cent of those aged 75 years or older (P < 0·001). Stage-adjusted DFS at 5 years for patients under 50 years old was 0·96, 0·90 and 0·77 in stage I, II and III respectively. Corresponding proportions were 0·88, 0·82 and 0·68 among patients aged 50-74 years, and 0·69, 0·62 and 0·49 for those aged 75 years or older. Relative survival was better for young patients only among those with stage III disease.

CONCLUSION

Patients younger than 50 years with colorectal cancer had a poorer stage at diagnosis and received more intensive oncological treatment. DFS was better than that among older patients in early-stage disease.

Effect of radiotherapy for rectal cancer on female sexual function: a prospective cohort study

Background

Clinical experience and limited data show that female sexual function is influenced negatively by preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the impact of RT on sexual function and ovarian reserve measured by levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH).

Methods

Women with stage I–III rectal cancer scheduled for surgery with or without preoperative (chemo)RT were included and followed for 2 years. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire responses and blood samples for hormone analyses, including AMH in women aged 45 years or less, were collected at baseline and during follow-up.

Results

In the group of 109 women who received preoperative RT, median scores in all FSFI domains decreased over time, as did the total FSFI score (from 18·5 (range 2·0–36·0) at baseline to 10·8 (2·0–34·8) at 2 years; P &lt; 0·001). In the group of 30 women who did not receive preoperative RT, only satisfaction declined over time (from 3·2 (0·8–6·0) to 1·8 (0·8–6·0); P = 0·012). In longitudinal regression analysis, the mean decline in FSFI total score was –9·33 (95 per cent c.i. –16·66 to –1·99; P = 0·013) for women who had preoperative RT compared with those who did not, with adjustment for age, Psychological General Well-being Index score and relationship with partner. A corresponding association was seen for arousal, lubrication, orgasm and pain. Five of six women aged 45 years or less with detectable serum levels of AMH at baseline had undetectable levels after RT.

Conclusion

Preoperative RT was associated with impairment in sexual function in women with rectal cancer. This needs to be considered when discussing choice of treatment and rehabilitation. In younger women, undetectable AMH levels after RT indicate an irreversible loss of ovarian follicles.

Postoperative complications in relation to overall treatment time in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy

Background

The optimal timing of surgery for rectal cancer after radiotherapy (RT) is disputed. The Stockholm III trial concluded that it was oncologically safe to delay surgery for 4–8 weeks after short-course RT (SRT), with fewer postoperative complications compared with SRT with surgery within a week. Other studies have indicated that an even shorter interval between RT and surgery (0–3 days) might be beneficial. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal interval to surgery after RT.

Methods

Patients were analysed as treated, in terms of overall treatment time (OTT), the interval from the start of RT until the day of surgery. Patients receiving SRT (5 × 5 Gy) were categorized according to OTT: 7 days (group A), 8–13 days (group B), 5–7 weeks (group C) and 8–13 weeks (group D). Patients receiving long-course RT (25 × 2 Gy) were grouped into those with an OTT of 9–11 weeks (group E) or 12–14 weeks (group F). Outcomes assessed were postoperative complications and early mortality.

Results

A total of 810 patients were analysed (group A, 100; group B, 247; group C, 192; group D, 160; group E, 52; group F, 59). Baseline patient characteristics were similar. There were significantly more overall complications in group B than in groups C and D. Adjusted odds ratios, with B as the reference group, were: 0·72 (95 per cent c.i. 0·40 to 1·32; P = 0·289), 0·50 (0·30 to 0·84; P = 0·009) and 0·39 (0·23 to 0·65; P &lt; 0·001) for groups A, C and D respectively. Early mortality was similar in all groups. There were no significant differences between long-course RT groups.

Conclusion

These results suggest that surgery should optimally be delayed for 4–12 weeks (OTT 5–13 weeks) after SRT.

Time trends of short-term mortality for octogenarians undergoing a colorectal resection in North Europe

BACKGROUND

Decreased cancer specific survival in older colorectal patients is mainly due to mortality in the first year, emphasizing the importance of the first postoperative year. This study aims to gain an overview and time trends of short-term mortality in octogenarians (≥80 years) with colorectal cancer across four North European countries.

METHODS

Patients of 80 years or older, operated for colorectal cancer (stage I-III) between 2005 and 2014, were included. Population-based cohorts from Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sweden were collected. Separately for colon- and rectal cancer, 30-day, 90-day, one-year, and excess one-year mortality were calculated. Also, short-term mortality over three time periods (2005-2008, 2009-2011, 2012-2014) was analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 35,158 colon cancer patients and 10,144 rectal cancer patients were included. For colon cancer, 90-day mortality rate was highest in Denmark (15%) and lowest in Sweden (8%). For rectal cancer, 90-day mortality rate was highest in Belgium (11%) and lowest in Sweden (7%). One-year excess mortality rate of colon cancer patients decreased from 2005 to 2008 to 2012-2014 for all countries (Belgium: 17%-11%, Denmark: 21%-15%, the Netherlands: 18%-10%, and Sweden: 10%-8%). For rectal cancer, from 2005 to 2008 to 2012-2014 one-year excess mortality rate decreased in the Netherlands from 16% to 7% and Sweden: 8%-2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term mortality rates were high in octogenarians operated for colorectal cancer. Short-term mortality rates differ across four North European countries, but decreased over time for both colon and rectal cancer patients in all countries.

Consensus and controversies regarding follow-up after treatment with curative intent of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: a synopsis of guidelines used in countries represented in the European Society of Coloproctology

AIM

It is common clinical practice to follow patients for a period of years after treatment with curative intent of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer, but follow-up strategies vary widely. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of recommendations on this topic in guidelines from member countries of the European Society of Coloproctology, with supporting evidence.

METHOD

A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the guideline databases Trip database, BMJ Best Practice and Guidelines International Network was performed. Quality assessment included use of the AGREE-II tool. All topics with recommendations from included guidelines were identified and categorized. For each subtopic, a conclusion was made followed by the degree of consensus and the highest level of evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-one guidelines were included. The majority recommended that structured follow-up should be offered, except for patients in whom treatment of recurrence would be inappropriate. It was generally agreed that clinical visits, measurement of carcinoembryoinc antigen and liver imaging should be part of follow-up, based on a high level of evidence, although the frequency is controversial. There was also consensus on imaging of the chest and pelvis in rectal cancer, as well as endoscopy, based on lower levels of evidence and with a level of intensity that was contradictory.

CONCLUSION

In available guidelines, multimodal follow-up after treatment with curative intent of colorectal cancer is widely recommended, but the exact content and intensity are highly controversial. International agreement on the optimal follow-up schedule is unlikely to be achieved on current evidence, and further research should refocus on individualized 'patient-driven' follow-up and new biomarkers.

Population-based study of surgical treatment with and without tumour resection in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Population-based studies of treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) are lacking. The aim was to investigate the surgical treatment of patients with LRRC at a national population-based level.

METHODS

All patients undergoing abdominal resection for primary rectal cancer between 1995 and 2002 in Sweden with LRRC as a first event were included. Detailed information about treatment, complications and outcomes was collected from the medical records. The patients were analysed in three groups: patients who had resection of the LRRC, those treated without tumour resection and patients who received best supportive care only.

RESULTS

In all, 426 patients were included in the study. Of these, 149 (35·0 per cent) underwent tumour resection, 193 (45·3 per cent) had treatment without tumour resection and 84 (19·7 per cent) received best supportive care. Abdominoperineal resection was the most frequent surgical procedure, performed in 65 patients (43·6 per cent of those who had tumour resection). Thirteen patients had total pelvic exenteration. In total, 63·8 per cent of those whose tumour was resected had potentially curative surgery. After tumour resection, 62 patients (41·6 per cent) had a complication within 30 days. Patients who received surgical treatment without tumour resection had a lower complication rate but a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate than those who underwent tumour resection (10 versus 1·3 per cent respectively; P = 0·002). Of all patients included in the study, 22·3 per cent had potentially curative treatment and the 3-year survival rate for these patients was 56 per cent.

CONCLUSION

LRRC is a serious condition with overall poor outcome. Patients undergoing curative surgery have an acceptable survival rate but substantial morbidity. There is room for improvement in the management of patients with LRRC.

Low anterior resection syndrome after right- and left-sided resections for colonic cancer

Background

This population‐based cohort study aimed to evaluate occurrence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and correlate this to health‐related quality of life in patients who had undergone segmental colonic resection for colonic cancer in the Stockholm–Gotland region. The hypothesis was that there is a difference in occurrence of LARS depending on whether a right‐ or a left‐sided resection was performed.

Methods

Patients who underwent segmental colonic resection for colonic cancer stages I–III in the Stockholm–Gotland region in 2013–2015 received EORTC QLQ‐C30, QLQ‐CR29 and LARS score questionnaires 1 year after surgery. Clinical patient and tumour data were collected from the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry. Patient‐reported outcome measures were analysed in relation to type of colonic resection.

Results

Questionnaires were sent to 866 patients and complete responses were provided by 517 (59·7 per cent). After right‐sided resection 20·6 per cent reported major LARS. After left‐sided resection the proportion with major LARS was 15·6 per cent. The odds ratio (OR) for major LARS after right‐sided resection was 1·45 (95 per cent c.i. 1·02 to 2·06; P = 0·037) compared with left‐sided resection. After adjustment for age and sex, an increase in the risk of major LARS after right‐ versus left‐sided resection remained (OR 1·48, 1·03 to 2·13; P = 0·035). Major LARS correlated with impaired quality of life.

Conclusion

Major LARS was more frequent after right‐sided than following left‐sided colonic resection. Major LARS reflected impaired quality of life.

Effect of radiotherapy for rectal cancer on ovarian androgen production

Background

The impact of radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer on ovarian androgen production is unknown. The aim was to examine the effect of RT for rectal cancer on androgen levels in non-oophorectomized women and the association with female sexual desire.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included women who had surgery for rectal cancer with or without RT. Serum testosterone, free testosterone, androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S) levels were assessed at baseline, after RT and 1 year after surgery. Sexual desire was assessed by means of the Female Sexual Function Index.

Results

Twenty-seven participants had surgery alone (RT– group) and 98 had preoperative RT and surgery (RT+ group). During the first year after surgery, median serum testosterone and free testosterone levels decreased from 0·6 (range 0·1–3·6) to 0·5 (0·1–2·3) nmol/l (P &lt; 0·001) and from 9·1 (1·6–45·8) to 7·9 (1·4–22·7) pmol/l (P &lt; 0·001) respectively in the RT+ group, but did not change in the RT– group. Longitudinal regression analysis confirmed a decrease in testosterone and free testosterone after RT. The adjusted change in androstenedione and DHEA-S was not significant in any group. The mean change in testosterone (odds ratio (OR) 2·74, 95 per cent c.i. 1·06 to 7·11; P = 0·038), free testosterone (OR 1·08, 1·02 to 1·15; P = 0·011), androstenedione (OR 1·52, 1·07 to 2·16; P = 0·019) and DHEA-S (OR 0·49, 0·27 to 0·89; P = 0·019) was related to change in sexual desire.

Conclusion

RT decreased levels of androgens predominantly derived from the ovaries, whereas androgens of mainly adrenal origin remained unchanged. Reduction in ovarian androgens may be associated with reduced sexual desire.

Muscles of the trunk and pelvis are responsive to testosterone administration: data from testosterone dose-response study in young healthy men

Testosterone dose-dependently increases appendicular muscle mass. However, the effects of testosterone administration on the core muscles of the trunk and the pelvis have not been evaluated. The present study evaluated the effects of testosterone administration on truncal and pelvic muscles in a dose-response trial. Participants were young healthy men aged 18-50 years participating in the 5α-Reductase (5aR) Trial. All participants received monthly injections of 7.5 mg leuprolide acetate to suppress endogenous testosterone production and weekly injections of 50, 125, 300, or 600 mg of testosterone enanthate and were randomized to receive either 2.5 mg dutasteride (5aR inhibitor) or placebo daily for 20 weeks. Muscles of the trunk and the pelvis were measured at baseline and the end of treatment using 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. The dose effect of testosterone on changes in the psoas major muscle area was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included changes in paraspinal, abdominal, pelvic floor, ischiocavernosus, and obturator internus muscles. The association between changes in testosterone levels and muscle area was also assessed. Testosterone dose-dependently increased areas of all truncal and pelvic muscles. The estimated change (95% confidence interval) of muscle area increase per 100 mg of testosterone enanthate dosage increase was 0.622 cm² (0.394, 0.850) for psoas; 1.789 cm² (1.317, 2.261) for paraspinal muscles, 2.530 cm² (1.627, 3.434) for total abdominal muscles, 0.455 cm² (0.233, 0.678) for obturator internus, and 0.082 cm² (0.003, 0.045) for ischiocavernosus; the increase in these volumes was significantly associated with the changes in on-treatment total and free serum testosterone concentrations. In conclusion, core muscles of the trunk and pelvis are responsive to testosterone administration. Future trials should evaluate the potential role of testosterone administration in frail men who are predisposed to falls and men with pelvic floor dysfunction.

Pelvic local recurrence from colorectal cancer: surgical challenge with changing preconditions

AIM

Although the rate of local recurrence (LR) after colorectal cancer surgery has decreased, it still poses major surgical and oncological challenges. The aims of this study, based on an audit from a tertiary referral centre, was to evaluate determinants associated with outcomes after surgery for pelvic LR and how these have changed over time.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of all resections for pelvic LR of colorectal cancer performed at the Karolinska University Hospital from January 2003 until August 2009 (period 1) and from September 2009 until November 2013 (period 2) .

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients with pelvic LR were operated on with a curative intent. An R0 resection was achieved in 77% and an R1 resection in 23%. Lateral compartments were invaded in 48% and this proportion increased in resections performed in period 2 (37% vs 60%, P = 0.05). R1 resections were associated with a higher risk of local re-recurrence than R0 resections (64% vs 16%; OR = 8.90, 95% CI: 2.71-29.78). Lateral recurrences were associated with a lower R0-resection rate than nonlateral recurrences (63% vs 90%; OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.64) and a higher risk of treatment failure in terms of local re-recurrence or distant metastases, or death, as first event (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.06-2.75). However, in a multivariate analysis only R1 resections remained a significant prognostic factor for treatment failure (HR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.32-4.27).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of lateral pelvic recurrences has increased over time. In comparison with non-lateral LRs, lateral LRs are more difficult to resect radically and are associated with worse overall and disease-free survival. However, with radical surgery many patients with pelvic locally recurrent colorectal cancer may be offered curative treatment.

Session 1: The surgeon as a prognostic factor in colon and rectal cancer?

The impact of quality of surgery, colorectal surgical specialization, training and expertise has been far greater on survival outcomes than adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies. The review of the evidence by Professor Martling and expert discussion addresses the evidence base and the crucial importance of the surgeon as a prognostic factor, and how this has been relatively neglected in comparison to other resources invested in improving the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer does not increase severe short-term postoperative adverse events

AIM

The aim was to assess whether complete mesocolic excision (CME) in patients with right-sided colon cancer is related to short-term mortality or postoperative adverse events requiring reoperation. The complete mobilization of an integral mesocolon and central ligation of blood vessels are essential steps in CME surgery. The resultant specimen, with an intact mesocolic fascia and a high number of harvested lymph nodes, is believed to be oncologically favourable. However, it has been suggested that CME surgery may increase the risk of intra-operative severe adverse events, due to exposure of vital retroperitoneal organs and large blood vessels.

METHOD

In a population-based, nested case-control study, all residents in the Stockholm County operated for right-sided colon cancer from 2004 until 2012 were identified from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients who died within 90 days after surgery or were reoperated within 30 days after surgery, or during the index hospital stay, were defined as cases. Two controls per case were randomly sampled and individually matched for age, sex, TNM stage and emergency vs elective surgery. Exposure status (CME surgery) was assessed from original surgical reports.

RESULTS

The estimated proportion of CME surgery was 14.8% (35 of 236) for cases and 19.5% (92 of 473) for controls. The unadjusted OR for short-term mortality or reoperation after CME surgery was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.47-1.10; P = 0.15). The ORs were lower in the late part of the study (0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-1.01) and in high volume hospitals (0.61, 95% CI: 0.35-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study does not indicate that CME surgery is associated with an increased risk of severe adverse events such as 90-day mortality or reoperation.

Prediction of outcome after curative surgery for colorectal cancer: preoperative haemoglobin, C-reactive protein and albumin

AIM

The aim was to evaluate a scoring system using the values of preoperative haemoglobin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin to predict colorectal cancer recurrence and survival.

METHOD

Data on all curative resections for Stages I-III colorectal cancer performed at a tertiary referral hospital in 2007-2010 were recorded in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and were matched to local databases for laboratory results and blood transfusion. Patients who died within 30 days or during primary hospital admission were excluded. Preoperative haemoglobin, CRP and albumin levels were recorded for 417 patients. A score (0-3) was derived on the presence of anaemia (Hb < 120 g/l for women and < 130 g/l for men), raised CRP (> 10 mg/ml) and low albumin (< 35 g/dl). The risks for recurrence and impaired overall survival were assessed using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Impaired overall survival was found when one, two or three of the criteria anaemia, elevated CRP and low albumin were present prior to surgery [hazard ratio (HR) 3.61, 95% CI 1.66-7.85; HR 3.91, 95% CI 1.75-8.74; HR 4.85, 95% CI 2.15-10.93, respectively]. The risk for recurrence, however, was not related to the presence of these criteria.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival after curative surgery for Stages I-III colorectal cancer is impaired when anaemia, elevated CRP or low albumin exist prior to surgery.

Population-based study of factors predicting treatment intention in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

Background

Local recurrence of rectal cancer (LRRC) is associated with poor survival unless curative treatment is performed. The aim of this study was to investigate predictive factors for treatment with curative intent in patients with LRRC.

Methods

Population-based data for patients treated for primary rectal cancer between 1995 and 2002, and with LRRC reported as first event were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records. The associations between patient-, primary tumour- and LRRC-related factors and intention of the treatment for LRRC were determined. The impact of the identified predictive factors on prognosis after treatment with curative intent was also assessed.

Results

A total of 426 patients were included in the study, of whom 149 (35·0 per cent) received treatment with curative intent. Factors significantly associated with treatment of the LRRC with palliative intent were primary surgery with abdominoperineal resection (odds ratio (OR) 5·16, 95 per cent c.i. 2·97 to 8·97), age at diagnosis of LRRC at least 80 years (OR 4·82, 2·37 to 9·80), symptoms at diagnosis (OR 2·79, 1·56 to 5·01) and non-central location of the LRRC (OR 1·79, 1·15 to 2·79). The overall 5-year survival rate was 8·9 per cent for all patients and 23·1 per cent among those treated with curative intent. In patients treated with curative intent, factors associated with increased risk of death were age 80 years or more (hazard ratio (HR) 2·44, 95 per cent c.i. 1·55 to 3·86), presence of symptoms (HR 1·92, 1·20 to 3·05), non-central tumour location (HR 1·51, 1·01 to 2·26) and presence of hydronephrosis (HR 2·02, 1·18 to 3·44).

Conclusion

Non-central location of the LRRC, presence of symptoms and age at least 80 years at diagnosis of the LRRC were associated with treatment with palliative intent.

Risk of second primary cancer in patients treated with radiotherapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Many patients with rectal cancer receive radiotherapy (RT) to reduce the risk of local recurrence. Radiation may give rise to adverse effects, including second primary cancers. In view of the divergent results of previous studies, the present study evaluated the risk of second primary cancer following RT in all randomized RT rectal cancer trials conducted in Sweden and in the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR).

METHODS

Patients included in five randomized trials and the SCRCR were linked to the Swedish Cancer Registry. Cox regression models estimated the hazard ratio (HR) of second primary cancer among patients who received RT compared with those who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 13 457 patients were included in this study; 7024 (52·2 per cent) received RT and 6433 (47·8 per cent) had surgery alone. Overall, no increased risk of second primary cancer was observed with RT (HR 1·03; 95 per cent c.i. 0·92 to 1·15), independently of follow-up time and location within or outside of the irradiated volume. In the randomized trials, with longer follow-up (maximum 31 years), a slight increase was observed outside of (HR 1·33, 1·01 to 1·74) but not within (HR 1·11, 0·73 to 1·67) the irradiated volume. Irradiated men had a lower risk of prostate cancer than those treated with surgery alone (HR 0·68, 0·51 to 0·91).

CONCLUSION

Overall, there was no increased risk of second primary cancer following RT for rectal cancer within or outside of the irradiated volume up to 20 years of follow-up. Men with rectal cancer who received RT had a reduced risk of prostate cancer.

Screening vs. non-screening detected colorectal cancer: Differences in pre-therapeutic work up and treatment

Objectives To compare preoperative staging, multidisciplinary team-assessment, and treatment in patients with screening detected and non-screening detected colorectal cancer. Methods Data on patient and tumour characteristics, staging, multidisciplinary team-assessment and treatment in patients with screening and non-screening detected colorectal cancer from 2008 to 2012 were collected from the Stockholm-Gotland screening register and the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Results The screening group had a higher proportion of stage I disease (41 vs. 15%; p < 0.001), a more complete staging of primary tumour and metastases and were more frequently multidisciplinary team-assessed than the non-screening group ( p < 0.001). In both groups, patients with endoscopically resected cancers were less completely staged and multidisciplinary team-assessed than patients with surgically resected cancers ( p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the screening and non-screening groups in the use of neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer (68 vs.76%), surgical treatment with local excision techniques in stage I rectal cancer (6 vs. 9%) or adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II and III disease (46 vs. 52%). Emergency interventions for colorectal cancer occurred in 4% of screening participants vs. 11% of non-compliers. Conclusions Screening detected cancer patients were staged and multidisciplinary team assessed more extensively than patients with non-screening detected cancers. Staging and multidisciplinary team assessment prior to endoscopic resection was less complete compared with surgical resection. Extensive surgical and (neo)adjuvant treatment was given in stage I disease. Participation in screening reduced the risk of emergency surgery for colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy and relative survival of patients with stage II colon cancer - A EURECCA international comparison between the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, England, Ireland, Belgium, and Lithuania

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present EURECCA international comparison is to compare adjuvant chemotherapy and relative survival of patients with stage II colon cancer between European countries.

METHODS

Population-based national cohort data (2004-2009) from the Netherlands (NL), Denmark (DK), Sweden (SE), England (ENG), Ireland (IE), and Belgium (BE) were obtained, as well as single-centre data from Lithuania. All surgically treated patients with stage II colon cancer were included. The proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was calculated and compared between countries. Besides, relative survival was calculated and compared between countries.

RESULTS

Overall, 59,154 patients were included. The proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy ranged from 7.1% to 29.0% (p < 0.001). Compared with NL, a better adjusted relative survival was observed in SE (stage II: relative excess risks (RER) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.64; p < 0.001), and BE (stage II: RER 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.92; p < 0.001), and in IE for patients with stage IIA disease (RER 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.98; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients with stage II colon cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy varied largely between seven European countries. No clear linear pattern between adjuvant chemotherapy and adjusted relative survival was observed. Compared with NL, SE and BE showed an improved adjusted relative survival for stage II disease, and IE for patients with stage IIA disease only. Further research into selection criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy could eventually lead to individually tailored, optimal treatment of patients with stage II colon cancer.

External validation of models predicting the individual risk of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis from colon and rectal cancer

AIM

To externally validate previously published predictive models of the risk of developing metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) after resection of nonmetastatic colon or rectal cancer and to update the predictive model for colon cancer by adding new prognostic predictors.

METHOD

Data from all patients with Stage I-III colorectal cancer identified from a population-based database in Stockholm between 2008 and 2010 were used. We assessed the concordance between the predicted and observed probabilities of PC and utilized proportional-hazard regression to update the predictive model for colon cancer.

RESULTS

When applied to the new validation dataset (n = 2011), the colon and rectal cancer risk-score models predicted metachronous PC with a concordance index of 79% and 67%, respectively. After adding the subclasses of pT3 and pT4 stage and mucinous tumour to the colon cancer model, the concordance index increased to 82%.

CONCLUSION

In validation of external and recent cohorts, the predictive accuracy was strong in colon cancer and moderate in rectal cancer patients. The model can be used to identify high-risk patients for planned second-look laparoscopy/laparotomy for possible subsequent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Accuracy of preoperative T and N staging in colon cancer--a national population-based study

AIM

To select patients for neoadjuvant therapy in colon cancer, there is a need to improve pre-therapeutic locoregional staging. There are now data showing that the TN stage can be adequately assessed by preoperative CT in dedicated centres. In Sweden the use of preoperative CT of the abdomen for staging of the primary tumour is increasing. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent the preoperatively reported radiological TN stage correlates with the histopathological TN stage in an entire population.

METHOD

Data were collected on the preoperative cTN stage according to the radiologist and postoperative pTN stage according to the pathologist on all patients operated on for colon cancer in Sweden 2007-2010. The correlation between cTN stage and pTN stage was calculated using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

T stage was compared in 4373 patients with cT and pT stage. The correlation coefficient was 0.44, indicating fair agreement. The cN and pN correlation coefficient was 0.28, indicating a slight correlation. There was no difference in correlation related to age, gender, tumour location, body mass index or emergent vs elective surgery. A slight difference was seen between different geographical regions.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CT in an unselected population does not result in an accurate cTN staging as previously reported from dedicated centres. To achieve adequate preoperative cTN staging nationally, the education of radiologists and optimization of the radiological method will be necessary.

Time trends, improvements and national auditing of rectal cancer management over an 18-year period

AIM

The main aims were to explore time trends in the management and outcome of patients with rectal cancer in a national cohort and to evaluate the possible impact of national auditing on overall outcomes. A secondary aim was to provide population-based data for appraisal of external validity in selected patient series.

METHOD

Data from the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry with virtually complete national coverage were utilized in this cohort study on 29 925 patients with rectal cancer diagnosed between 1995 and 2012. Of eligible patients, nine were excluded.

RESULTS

During the study period, overall, relative and disease-free survival increased. Postoperative mortality after 30 and 90 days decreased to 1.7% and 2.9%. The 5-year local recurrence rate dropped to 5.0%. Resection margins improved, as did peri-operative blood loss despite more multivisceral resections being performed. Fewer patients underwent palliative resection and the proportion of non-operated patients increased. The proportions of temporary and permanent stoma formation increased. Preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy became more common as did multidisciplinary team conferences. Variability in rectal cancer management between healthcare regions diminished over time when new aspects of patient care were audited.

CONCLUSION

There have been substantial changes over time in the management of patients with rectal cancer, reflected in improved outcome. Much indirect evidence indicates that auditing matters, but without a control group it is not possible to draw firm conclusions regarding the possible impact of a quality control registry on faster shifts in time trends, decreased variability and improvements. Registry data were made available for reference.

Tumour regression in the randomized Stockholm III Trial of radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer

Background

The Stockholm III Trial randomized patients with primary operable rectal cancers to either short‐course radiotherapy (RT) with immediate surgery (SRT), short‐course RT with surgery delayed 4–8 weeks (SRT‐delay) or long‐course RT with surgery delayed 4–8 weeks. This preplanned interim analysis examined the pathological outcome of delaying surgery.

Methods

Patients randomized to the SRT and SRT‐delay arms in the Stockholm III Trial between October 1998 and November 2010 were included, and data were collected in a prospective register. Additional data regarding tumour regression grade, according to Dworak, and circumferential margin were obtained by reassessment of histopathological slides.

Results

A total of 462 of 545 randomized patients had specimens available for reassessment. Patients randomized to SRT‐delay had earlier ypT categories, and a higher rate of pathological complete responses (11·8 versus 1·7 per cent; P = 0·001) and Dworak grade 4 tumour regression (10·1 versus 1·7 per cent; P < 0·001) than patients randomized to SRT without delay. Positive circumferential resection margins were uncommon (6·3 per cent) and rates did not differ between the two treatment arms.

Conclusion

Short‐course RT induces tumour downstaging if surgery is performed after an interval of 4–8 weeks.

Short‐course therapy with delay causes downstaging

Risk of disability pension in patients following rectal cancer treatment and surgery

BACKGROUND

Aspects of survivorship, such as long-term ability to work, are increasingly relevant owing to the improved survival of patients with rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess risk and determinants of disability pension (DP) in this patient group.

METHODS

Using Swedish national clinical and population-based registers, patients with stage I-III rectal cancer aged 18-61 years in 1995-2009 were identified at diagnosis and matched with population comparators. Prospectively registered records of DP during follow-up were retrieved up to 2013. Non-proportional and proportional hazards models were used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for DP annually and overall. Potential variations in risk by demographic and clinical factors were calculated, with relapse as a time-varying exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 2815 patients were identified and compared with 13 465 population comparators. During a median follow-up of 6·0 (range 0-10) years, 23·3 per cent of the relapse-free patients and 10·3 per cent of the population comparators received DP (IRR 2·40, 95 per cent c.i. 2·17 to 2·65). An increased annual risk of DP was evident almost every year until the tenth year of follow-up. Abdominoperineal resection was associated with an increased DP risk compared with anterior resection (IRR 1·44, 1·19 to 1·75). Surgical complications (IRR 1·33, 1·10 to 1·62) and reoperation (IRR 1·42, 1·09 to 1·84), but not radiotherapy or chemotherapy, were associated with risk of DP.

CONCLUSION

Relapse-free patients with rectal cancer of working age are at risk of disability pension.

Remaining cancer cells within the fibrosis after neo-adjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer

AIM

To analyse the incidence and distribution of remaining cancer cells within the fibrosis induced by preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

The histopathological specimens from 46 patients operated on with extensive surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer after CRT were examined. The extension of fibrosis in relation to the mesorectal fascia (MRF) and the distribution of cancer cells within the fibrosis was examined using routine haematoxylin-eosin staining. In addition, immunohistochemical staining with CK20 was done to examine if cancer cells were missed by routine pathological work up.

RESULTS

All specimens showed CRT induced fibrosis. Two specimens showed complete response without viable cancer cells (ypT0). The fibrosis was limited inside the MRF in three cases, adherent to or involved the MRF in ten cases and in 33 cases the fibrosis was obvious outside as well as inside the fascia. Twenty-one cases showed fibrosis on the surgical resection margin, and in 9 of these cancer cells were found on the surgical margin (R1, R2-resection). 37 patients had R0 resections and among those 24 showed fibrosis beyond the MFR and 13 had scattered cancer cells in the fibrosis along or outside the MRF.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of remaining cancer cells within the fibrosis was high in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with CRT. Frequently cancer cells were detected near the border of the fibrosis. A complete resection of the fibrosis is therefore recommended to achieve an R0 resection after neo-adjuvant treatment.

Time to local recurrence as a prognostic factor in patients with rectal cancer

AIMS

Survival after the local recurrence of rectal cancer is influenced by several factors. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the time interval from primary surgery for rectal cancer to local recurrence diagnosis has any impact on survival.

METHODS

Population-based data was collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. 7410 patients were operated with radical abdominal surgery for rectal cancer during the period 1995-2002. Of these, 386 (5%) developed a local recurrence as a first event. The patients were divided into two groups: early local recurrence (ELR), diagnosed <12 months after primary surgery, and late local recurrence (LLR), diagnosed ≥12 months after primary surgery. Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios were calculated for survival analyses. Survival was calculated from the date of the local recurrence diagnosis to death or end of follow-up.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients had ELR and 291 patients LLR. Median time to local recurrence was 1.7 (0.1-7.9) years. Patients with a stage III primary tumour and non-irradiated patients were more common in the ELR compared with the LLR group. Factors that influenced survival were age at diagnosis of local recurrence (p < 0.001), stage of primary tumour (p = 0.027), and surgical resection of local recurrence (p < 0.001). Time to diagnosis of local recurrence had no influence on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in survival from date of diagnosis of local recurrence was seen between patients with ELR and patients with LLR. All patients with local recurrence should therefore be assessed for potential curative surgery, disregarding time to local recurrence.

Local control and survival after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for locally advanced or low rectal cancer

AIM

Conventional, synchronous combined, abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal cancer is associated with intra-operative tumour perforation and tumour involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM+). Several studies have demonstrated worse rates of local recurrence and survival after APE than after low anterior resection (LAR). Extralevator APE (ELAPE) in the prone position may reduce the risk of perforation and involvement of resection margins and may therefore improve outcome. The aim of this study was to report the outcome after the introduction of ELAPE in a prospective study of consecutive patients from a single colorectal unit.

METHOD

Between January 2000 and March 2013, 193 patients with low rectal cancer were treated with ELAPE at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. All patients were recorded in the regional rectal cancer quality registry, where data on treatment and follow-up are prospectively reported.

RESULTS

Preoperative staging with MRI assessed the tumour to be locally advanced (mrT4) in 126 (65%) of the 193 patients. The median tumour level above the anal verge was 3 cm. Intra-operative perforation occurred in 19 patients (10%) and histopathology revealed a positive CRM in 39 patients (20%). Until August 2013 [median follow-up 31 (0-156) months] local recurrence was detected in 12 patients. Five-year cancer specific survival was estimated to 68%.

CONCLUSION

Good local control and survival may be achieved with ELAPE in patients with low, advanced rectal cancer.

Management of colon cancer in the elderly: a population-based study

AIM

Although the median age of patients diagnosed with colon cancer is over 70 years, little is known about specific characteristics and management in the elderly. The aim of this study was to define the characteristics of colon cancer in elderly patients and compare the quality of preoperative assessment and surgery with that of younger patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer.

METHOD

Data on 15,255 patients diagnosed with colon cancer between 2007 and 2010 were retrieved from the Swedish National Colon Cancer Register. Of these, 12,959 underwent surgical resection: 6141 were 75 years or older while 6818 were younger. The χ(2) test, Mann-Whitney U-test and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used for between-group comparison.

RESULTS

Older patients were more likely to be female (54% older/48% younger) and have right-sided cancer (60% older/49% younger). Among patients who underwent resection, the elderly were less often evaluated regarding tumour stage prior to surgery (59% older/65% younger) and they were less often evaluated at a multidisciplinary team conference (26% older/34% younger). Elderly patients more frequently underwent emergency surgery (22% older/19% younger) despite having an earlier cancer stage. When adjusted for stage, fewer elderly patients underwent a radical curative procedure (OR for noncurative resection 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.33).

CONCLUSION

Routine management of patients with colon cancer is age-dependent. Patients aged 75 years and older are less often completely staged and less often evaluated at a multidisciplinary team conference prior to surgery. Adjusted for stage, fewer elderly patients undergo curative resection.

Individualized prediction of risk of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer

AIM

The purpose of the study was to develop a tool for predicting the individual risk of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis after surgery for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHOD

Independent predictors for metachronous colorectal carcinomatosis have previously been identified using a population-based database. Predictive models for colon and rectal cancer were developed from these data. The predictive models were based on multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and were internally validated with bootstrapping. Performance was assessed by the concordance index and calibration plots.

RESULTS

In all, 8044 patients who underwent abdominal resection of colorectal cancer Stage I-III were included. The colon and rectal cancer risk score models predicted metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis with a concordance index of 80% and 78%, respectively. Factors in the models included age, pathological pT stage, pN stage, number of examined lymph nodes (0-11, 12+), type of surgery (emergency/elective), completeness of cancer resection (R0/R1/R2), adjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no), preoperative radiotherapy and tumour location.

CONCLUSION

The proposed predictive models showed high internal validity and enabled individualized prediction of peritoneal recurrence of colorectal cancer. The models may help in the planning of treatment and follow-up of patients. However, external validation is warranted to assess generalizability of the predicted absolute risks.

Pretreatment staging of colon cancer in the Swedish population

AIM

Preoperative staging of colon cancer according to Swedish national guidelines implies imaging evaluation of the primary tumour, liver and lungs. Failure to adhere to these guidelines results in negative scorings in the national registration system. In the present study we report the extent of compliance with these guidelines.

METHOD

Since 2007 clinical data on all patients diagnosed with colon cancer in Sweden have been collected in a national database. This includes information on pretherapeutic diagnostic imaging performed, pretherapeutic TNM stage and data on treatment and follow-up. All patients diagnosed with colon cancer in Sweden between 2007 and 2010 were included.

RESULTS

Nine thousand and eight-three patients (i.e. 60.5% of all patients) had a complete pretherapeutic radiological evaluation; 65.2% had a CT or MRI of the primary tumour, whereas over 80% had examinations of the liver and lungs. There were no difference related to sex, but more patients under 75 years had a complete evaluation. There were large differences between different regions; one region performed a complete evaluation of 78.3% of all patients. The proportion of patients examined increased from 53.9 to 65.0% during the study period. Elective cases were more frequently evaluated before treatment than those with an emergency presentation.

CONCLUSION

Most patients in Sweden had a complete pretreatment imaging evaluation of the colon cancer with geographical and time-dependent variations. Knowledge of the importance of these variations and correlation of pre- and postoperative TNM stage is warranted, and such studies are ongoing.

Local recurrence after prone vs supine abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer

AIM

Tumour-involved circumferential resection margins (CRMs) and intra-operative perforation (IOP) are well known risk factors for local recurrence after surgery for low rectal cancer. In conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE) the patient remains in the supine position for the perineal part of the procedure. However, turning the patient to the prone position may improve visualization which potentially might reduce the risk of involved CRMs and IOP and thus improve local control. The study was carried out to assess local recurrence rates after APE in relation to the positioning of the patient during the perineal part of the procedure.

METHOD

This cohort study includes 466 patients having APE for low rectal cancer between 2001 and December 2010. Data were retrieved from the regional rectal cancer registry in Stockholm and from a retrospective review of patient files.

RESULTS

An incomplete resection was reported in 12.4% after APE in the supine position and in 6.8% after APE in the prone position (P = 0.038). Corresponding figures for IOP were 12.4% and 4.0% (P < 0.001). Prone APE was associated with a 39% relative reduction in local recurrence events compared with APE in the supine position, although the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.27-1.37).

CONCLUSION

APE in the prone position reduced the incidence of incomplete resection and IOP, but the study did not find a statistically significant difference in local failure rates related to the position of the patient.

Impaired postoperative leucocyte counts after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer in the Stockholm III Trial

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) in rectal cancer increases postoperative morbidity. A suggested reason is RT-induced bone marrow depression resulting in impaired leucocyte counts. The ongoing Stockholm III Trial randomizes patients with operable rectal cancers to short-course RT with immediate surgery (SRT), short-course RT with surgery delayed for 4-8 weeks (SRT-delay) and long-course RT with surgery delayed for 4-8 weeks (LRT-delay). This study examined differences between the randomization arms regarding leucocyte response and postoperative complications.

METHODS

Patients randomized in the Stockholm III Trial between October 1998 and November 2010 were included. Data were collected in a prospective register. Additional data were obtained by retrospective review of clinical records.

RESULTS

Of 657 randomized patients, 585 had data on leucocytes. The SRT arm had the highest proportion of postoperative complications (SRT, 52·5 per cent; SRT-delay, 39·4 per cent; LRT-delay, 41 per cent; P = 0·010). There was no association between low preoperative leucocyte count and postoperative complications (P = 0·238). Irrespective of randomization arm, patients with an impaired postoperative to preoperative leucocyte ratio had the highest rate of complications (low ratio, 56·6 per cent; intermediate ratio, 46·9 per cent; high ratio, 36·3 per cent; P = 0·010). The SRT arm had the highest proportion of low ratios (SRT, 48·9 per cent; SRT-delay, 22·8 per cent; LRT-delay, 22 per cent; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

An impaired postoperative leucocyte response is associated with postoperative complications. The highest risk is with immediate surgery following short-course radiotherapy.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT 00904813 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Short-term outcome after gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum

AIM

Extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (APE) of the rectum has been introduced with the aim of improving the oncological outcome of low rectal cancer. The procedure includes resection of the levator muscles en bloc with the mesorectum, leaving a larger perineal defect than after conventional APE. This study reports short-term outcome of gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap reconstruction on perineal wound healing.

METHOD

Sixty-five patients were studied after extra-levator APE and a one-sided myocutaneous flap for a low or locally recurrent rectal cancer at the Karolinska University Hospital from January 2002 to December 2008. Fifty-nine had received neoadjuvant radio- or radiochemotherapy. All perineal complications occurring within 30 days after surgery were registered. In addition, the status of the perineal reconstruction at 6 months and 1 year after surgery was assessed based on medical records from outpatient visits.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (41.5%) patients had one or more perineal wound complications. A minor wound infection occurred in 15, while 12 had either a more severe infection with dehiscence or a pelvic abscess. The reconstruction was completely healed in 91% of the patients at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Although the vast majority of the perineal reconstructions were healed at 1 year, the short-term perineal wound complication rate of gluteus maximus flap reconstruction was high.

Increased lymph node harvest in patients operated on for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based study

AIM

In recent decades, the focus has been on the treatment of rectal cancer with improved surgical techniques. This has resulted in improved results for patients with rectal cancer. Recently, the focus has shifted to colon cancer surgery with the introduction of preoperative staging, new surgical techniques, quality control and enhanced recovery programmes. The change in operative techniques has been most pronounced for patients with tumours on the right side of the colon, with more extensive resections and proximal ligations of the vessels. The aim of this study was to assess the number of analysed lymph nodes and the metastatic index (MI) in patients operated on for right-sided colon cancer in the Stockholm area between 1996 and 2009.

METHOD

All patients operated on for cancer of the right colon between January 1996 and December 2009 were divided into three groups based on the year in which they were operated (period 1, 1996-1999; period 2, 2000-2004; and period 3, 2005-2009). The number of lymph nodes and lymph node status were analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 3536 patients were operated on for right-sided colon cancer during the study period. There was a significantly lower proportion of emergency operations in the third time period. The mean number of lymph nodes examined increased significantly during the overall study period (seven in period 1, 11 in period 2 and 18 in period 3; P < 0.001). A significant drop in MI was seen during the third time period (0.25, compared with 0.40 in period 1 and 0.40 in period 2; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

During the study period there was an increase in the number of analysed lymph nodes and a decrease in MI after right-sided hemicolectomies. Further investigations are needed to evaluate the potential impact on short-term and long-term outcome.