1
|
Mirnezami AH, Drami I, Glyn T, Sutton PA, Tiernan J, Behrenbruch C, Guerra G, Waters PS, Woodward N, Applin S, Charles SJ, Rose SA, Denys A, Pape E, van Ramshorst GH, Baker D, Bignall E, Blair I, Davis P, Edwards T, Jackson K, Leendertse PG, Love-Mott E, MacKenzie L, Martens F, Meredith D, Nettleton SE, Trotman MP, van Hecke JJM, Weemaes AMJ, Abecasis N, Angenete E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Barton D, Baseckas G, Beggs A, Brown K, Buchwald P, Burling D, Burns E, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Chang GJ, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Daniels IR, Denost QD, Drozdov E, Eglinton T, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Flatmark K, Folkesson J, Frizelle FA, Gallego MA, Gil-Moreno A, Goffredo P, Griffiths B, Gwenaël F, Harris DA, Iversen LH, Kandaswamy GV, Kazi M, Kelly ME, Kokelaar R, Kusters M, Langheinrich MC, Larach T, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Mann C, McDermott FD, Monson JRT, Neeff H, Negoi I, Ng JL, Nicolaou M, Palmer G, Parnaby C, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Quyn A, Rogers A, Rothbarth J, Abu Saadeh F, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Smart NJ, Smith T, Sorrentino L, Steele SR, Stitzenberg K, Taylor C, Teras J, Thanapal MR, Thorgersen E, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Waller J, Weber K, Wolthuis A, Winter DC, Brangan G, Vimalachandran D, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alahmadi R, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles M, Antoniou A, Armitage J, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Ceelen W, Chan KKL, Chew MH, Chok AK, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Damjanovic L, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Duff M, Egger E, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fahy M, Fearnhead NS, Fichtner-Feigl S, Fleming F, Flor B, Foskett K, Funder J, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Giner F, Ginther N, Glover T, Golda T, Gomez CM, Harris C, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helbren C, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Holmström A, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kaufman M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Kersting S, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Khaw J, Kim H, Kim HJ, Kiran R, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kraft M, Kristensen HØ, Kumar S, Lago V, Lakkis Z, Lampe B, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lynch AC, Mackintosh M, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McGrath JS, McPhee A, Maciel J, Malde S, Manfredelli S, Mikalauskas S, Modest D, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Navarro AS, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, O’Dwyer ST, Paarnio K, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock O, Pfeffer F, Piqeur F, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Oliver A, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Seifert G, Selvasekar C, Shaban M, Shaikh I, Shida D, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Spasojevic M, Steffens D, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Sumrien H, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor D, Tejedor P, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Thaysen HV, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tolenaar J, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner G, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Rees J, van Zoggel D, Vásquez-Jiménez W, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weiser MR, Westney OL, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA. The empty pelvis syndrome: a core data set from the PelvEx collaborative. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae042. [PMID: 38456677 PMCID: PMC10921833 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration (PE), but is undefined. EPS outcome reporting and descriptors of radicality of PE are inconsistent; therefore, the best approaches for prevention are unknown. To facilitate future research into EPS, the aim of this study is to define a measurable core outcome set, core descriptor set and written definition for EPS. Consensus on strategies to mitigate EPS was also explored. METHOD Three-stage consensus methodology was used: longlisting with systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient engagement, and Delphi-piloting; shortlisting with two rounds of modified Delphi; and a confirmatory stage using a modified nominal group technique. This included a selection of measurement instruments, and iterative generation of a written EPS definition. RESULTS One hundred and three and 119 participants took part in the modified Delphi and consensus meetings, respectively. This encompassed international patient and healthcare professional representation with multidisciplinary input. Seventy statements were longlisted, seven core outcomes (bowel obstruction, enteroperineal fistula, chronic perineal sinus, infected pelvic collection, bowel obstruction, morbidity from reconstruction, re-intervention, and quality of life), and four core descriptors (magnitude of surgery, radiotherapy-induced damage, methods of reconstruction, and changes in volume of pelvic dead space) reached consensus-where applicable, measurement of these outcomes and descriptors was defined. A written definition for EPS was agreed. CONCLUSIONS EPS is an area of unmet research and clinical need. This study provides an agreed definition and core data set for EPS to facilitate further research.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zwart WH, Dijkstra EA, Putter H, Marijnen CAM, Nilsson PJ, van de Velde CJH, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B. Corrigendum to "Authors' reply-Does the RAPIDO trial suggest a benefit of post-operative chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer? No, it does not": [ESMO Open 8 (2023) 101645]. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102042. [PMID: 37866027 PMCID: PMC10598700 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- W H Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
| | - E A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen
| | - H Putter
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
West CT, West MA, Mirnezami AH, Drami I, Denys A, Glyn T, Sutton PA, Tiernan J, Behrenbruch C, Guerra G, Waters PS, Woodward N, Applin S, Charles SJ, Rose SA, Pape E, van Ramshorst GH, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul AN, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alahmadi R, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles M, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Armitage J, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brown K, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ceelen W, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chew MH, Chok AK, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Damjanovic L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Denost QD, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Drozdov E, Duff M, Egger E, Eglinton T, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fahy M, Fearnhead NS, Fichtner-Feigl S, Flatmark K, Fleming F, Flor B, Folkesson J, Foskett K, Frizelle FA, Funder J, Gallego MA, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Gil-Moreno A, Giner F, Ginther N, Glover T, Goffredo P, Golda T, Gomez CM, Griffiths B, Gwenaël F, Harris C, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helbren C, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Holmström A, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Iversen LH, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kaufman M, Kazi M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Kelly ME, Kersting S, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Khaw J, Kim H, Kim HJ, Kiran R, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kraft M, Kristensen HØ, Kumar S, Kusters M, Lago V, Lakkis Z, Lampe B, Langheinrich MC, Larach T, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Mackintosh M, Mann C, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, McPhee A, Maciel J, Malde S, Manfredelli S, Mikalauskas S, Modest D, Monson JRT, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Navarro AS, Neeff H, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, O’Dwyer ST, Paarnio K, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock A, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Pfeffer F, Piqeur F, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Oliver A, Quyn A, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Seifert G, Selvasekar C, Shaban M, Shaikh I, Shida D, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Smith T, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Spasojevic M, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Sumrien H, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor C, Taylor D, Tejedor P, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Thanapal MR, Thaysen HV, Thorgersen E, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tolenaar J, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner G, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Rees J, van Zoggel D, Vásquez-Jiménez W, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weber K, Weiser MR, Westney OL, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA, Winter DC. Empty pelvis syndrome: PelvEx Collaborative guideline proposal. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1730-1731. [PMID: 37757457 PMCID: PMC10805575 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
|
4
|
Zwart WH, Dijkstra EA, Putter H, Marijnen CAM, Nilsson PJ, van de Velde CJH, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B. Authors' reply-Does the RAPIDO trial suggest a benefit of post-operative chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer? No, it does not. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101645. [PMID: 37713932 PMCID: PMC10511774 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- W H Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - E A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dijkstra EA, Zwart WH, Putter H, Marijnen CAM, Nilsson PJ, van de Velde CJH, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B. Authors' reply-A sensitivity analysis of the RAPIDO clinical trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:446-447. [PMID: 36581138 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - W H Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dijkstra EA, Zwart WH, Nilsson PJ, Putter H, Roodvoets AGH, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Frödin JE, Nygren P, Østergaard L, Kersten C, Verbiené I, Cervantes A, Hendriks MP, Capdevila J, Edhemovic I, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B. The value of post-operative chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer-results from the RAPIDO trial. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101158. [PMID: 36871393 PMCID: PMC10163161 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) rather than radiotherapy (RT) has resulted in fewer locoregional recurrences (LRRs), but no decrease in distant metastasis (DM) rate for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In many countries, patients receive post-operative chemotherapy (pCT) to improve oncological outcomes. We investigated the value of pCT after pre-operative CRT in the RAPIDO trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomised between experimental (short-course RT, chemotherapy and surgery) and standard-of-care treatment (CRT, surgery and pCT depending on hospital policy). In this substudy, we compared curatively resected patients from the standard-of-care group who received pCT (pCT+ group) with those who did not (pCT- group). Subsequently, patients from the pCT+ group who received at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy cycles (pCT ≥75% group) were compared with patients who did not receive pCT (pCT-/- group). By propensity score stratification (PSS), we adjusted for the following unbalanced confounders: age, clinical extramural vascular invasion, distance to the anal verge, ypT stage, ypN stage, residual tumour, serious adverse event (SAE) and/or readmission within 6 weeks after surgery and SAE related to pre-operative CRT. Cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS), DM, LRR and overall survival (OS) was analysed by Cox regression. RESULTS In total, 396/452 patients had a curative resection. The number of patients in the pCT+, pCT >75%, pCT- and pCT-/- groups was 184, 112, 154 and 149, respectively. The PSS-adjusted analyses for all endpoints demonstrated hazard ratios between approximately 0.7 and 0.8 (pCT+ versus pCT-), and 0.5 and 0.8 (pCT ≥75% versus pCT-/-). However, all 95% confidence intervals included 1. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest a benefit of pCT after pre-operative CRT for patients with high-risk LARC, with approximately 20%-25% improvement in DFS and OS and 20%-25% risk reductions in DM and LRR. Compliance with pCT additionally reduces or improves all endpoints by 10%-20%. However, differences are not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - W H Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Putter
- Departments of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - A G H Roodvoets
- Departments of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - J E Frödin
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Uppsala
| | - P Nygren
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - L Østergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - C Kersten
- Department of Research, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - I Verbiené
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Biomedical Research Institute Incliva, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - M P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - J Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall Hebron University Hospital. Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Edhemovic
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Departments of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fahy MR, Kelly ME, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles MA, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Beynon J, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ceelan W, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chang M, Chew MH, Chok AY, Chong P, Clouston H, Codd M, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Damjanovich L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Denost Q, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Drozdov E, Duff M, Eglinton T, Enriquez-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fearnhead NS, Ferron G, Flatmark K, Fleming FJ, Flor B, Folkesson J, Frizelle FA, Funder J, Gallego MA, Gargiulo M, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Gil-Moreno A, Giner F, Ginther DN, Glyn T, Glynn R, Golda T, Griffiths B, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Iversen LH, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kazi M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Kiran RP, Kim H, Kim HJ, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kristensen HØ, Kroon HM, Kumar S, Kusters M, Lago V, Lampe B, Lakkis Z, Larach JT, Larkin JO, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Maciel J, Manfredelli S, Mann C, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Marques CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Mehigan BJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, Mikalauskas S, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McCormick P, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, Malde S, Mirnezami A, Monson JRT, Navarro AS, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Ng JL, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, Nugent T, Oliver A, O’Dwyer ST, O’Sullivan NJ, Paarnio K, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock O, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Quyn A, Rajendran N, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Selvasekar C, Shaikh I, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Sorrentino L, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Spasojevic M, Sumrien H, Sutton PA, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor C, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Thaysen HV, Thurairaja R, Thorgersen EB, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Ramshorst GH, van Zoggel D, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Vather R, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Urrejola G, Wakeman C, Warrier SK, Wasmuth HH, Waters PS, Weber K, Weiser MR, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Williams A, Wilson M, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA, Winter DC. Minimum standards of pelvic exenterative practice: PelvEx Collaborative guideline. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1251-1263. [PMID: 36170347 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This document outlines the important aspects of caring for patients who have been diagnosed with advanced pelvic cancer. It is primarily aimed at those who are establishing a service that adequately caters to this patient group. The relevant literature has been summarized and an attempt made to simplify the approach to management of these complex cases.
Collapse
|
8
|
Villard C, Habib M, Nordenvall C, Nilsson PJ, Jorns C, Sparrelid E. Conversion therapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2038-2045. [PMID: 33640172 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occurrence of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) impairs prognosis, yet long-term survival can be achieved by enabling liver resection. This study aims to describe factors associated with conversion therapy leading to liver surgery and treatment outcome. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with CRLM discussed at multidisciplinary team conference at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, from 2013 to 2018. Factors associated with conversion therapy and outcome following conversion therapy were analysed with logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS Out of 1023 patients with CRLM, 100 patients (10%) received conversion chemotherapy, out of whom 31 patients (31%) subsequently underwent liver resection. Patients in whom conversion chemotherapy resulted in liver resection were younger (median age 61 vs. 66 years, p = .024), less likely to have a KRAS/NRAS-mutated primary tumours (25% vs. 53%, p = .039) and more likely to have received anti-EGFR agents (32% vs. 4%, p = .001) than patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy. The median OS for patients treated with conversion chemotherapy leading to liver resection was 24 months, compared to 14 months for patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy, p < .001. The OS for patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy was similar to patients given palliative chemotherapy, approximately 13 months. CONCLUSION Conversion therapy offers a survival benefit in selected patients. Despite treatment advances, the majority of patients undergoing conversion chemotherapy never become eligible for curative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Villard
- Department of Cancer, Division of Upper GI, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M Habib
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Equipe Recherche, Chronothérapie, Cancers et Transplantation, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Jorns
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Cancer, Division of Upper GI, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kelly ME, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abecasis N, Abraham‐Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Auer R, Austin KK, Aziz O, Baker RP, Bali M, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Beynon J, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo‐Marulanda A, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chew MH, Chong PC, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Codd M, Collins D, Colquhoun A, Corr A, Coscia M, Coyne PE, Creavin B, Croner RS, Damjanovic L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, Denost Q, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Duff M, Eglinton T, Enrique‐Navascues JM, Espin‐Basany E, Evans MD, Fearnhead NS, Flatmark K, Fleming F, Frizelle FA, Gallego MA, Garcia‐Granero E, Garcia‐Sabrido JL, Gentilini L, George ML, Ghouti L, Giner F, Ginther N, Glynn R, Golda T, Griffiths B, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helewa RM, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Hompes R, Jenkins JT, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Khan MS, Kiran RP, Kim H, Kim HJ, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kristensen HØ, Kroon HM, Kusters M, Lago V, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, Malde S, Mirnezami A, Monson JRT, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, O’Connell PR, O’Dwyer ST, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Quyn A, Radwan RW, van Ramshorst GH, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Regenbogen SE, Renehan A, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Ryan ÉJ, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu V, Selvasekar C, Shaikh I, Hellawell G, Shida D, Simpson A, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Sumrien H, Sutton PA, Swartking T, Taylor C, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Vasquez‐Jimenez W, Verhoef C, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weber K, Weiser MR, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, de Wilt JHW, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, van Zoggel D, Winter DC. Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection for primary rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: results from the PelvEx Collaborative. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1258-1262. [PMID: 32294308 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM At presentation, 15-20% of patients with rectal cancer already have synchronous liver metastases. The aim of this study was to determine the surgical and survival outcomes in patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent combined pelvic exenteration and liver (oligometastatic) resection. METHOD Data from 20 international institutions that performed simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection between 2007 and 2017 were accumulated. Primarily, we examined perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality. We also assessed the impact that margin status had on survival. RESULTS Of 128 patients, 72 (56.2%) were men with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR) 15 years]. The median size of the liver oligometastatic deposits was 2 cm (IQR 1.8 cm). The median duration of surgery was 406 min (IQR 240 min), with a median blood loss of 1090 ml (IQR 2010 ml). A negative resection margin (R0 resection) was achieved in 73.5% of pelvic exenterations and 66.4% of liver resections. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.6%, and 32% of patients had a major postoperative complication. The 5-year overall survival for patients in whom an R0 resection of both primary and metastatic disease was achieved was 54.6% compared with 20% for those with an R1/R2 resection (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection is feasible, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous resection should only be performed where an R0 resection of both pelvic and hepatic disease is anticipated.
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- P J Nilsson
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iversen H, Martling A, Johansson H, Nilsson PJ, Holm T. Pelvic local recurrence from colorectal cancer: surgical challenge with changing preconditions. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:399-406. [PMID: 29161761 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Although the rate of local recurrence (LR) after colorectal cancer surgery has decreased, it still poses major surgical and oncological challenges. The aims of this study, based on an audit from a tertiary referral centre, was to evaluate determinants associated with outcomes after surgery for pelvic LR and how these have changed over time. METHOD Retrospective analysis of all resections for pelvic LR of colorectal cancer performed at the Karolinska University Hospital from January 2003 until August 2009 (period 1) and from September 2009 until November 2013 (period 2) . RESULTS Ninety-five patients with pelvic LR were operated on with a curative intent. An R0 resection was achieved in 77% and an R1 resection in 23%. Lateral compartments were invaded in 48% and this proportion increased in resections performed in period 2 (37% vs 60%, P = 0.05). R1 resections were associated with a higher risk of local re-recurrence than R0 resections (64% vs 16%; OR = 8.90, 95% CI: 2.71-29.78). Lateral recurrences were associated with a lower R0-resection rate than nonlateral recurrences (63% vs 90%; OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.64) and a higher risk of treatment failure in terms of local re-recurrence or distant metastases, or death, as first event (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.06-2.75). However, in a multivariate analysis only R1 resections remained a significant prognostic factor for treatment failure (HR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.32-4.27). CONCLUSION The proportion of lateral pelvic recurrences has increased over time. In comparison with non-lateral LRs, lateral LRs are more difficult to resect radically and are associated with worse overall and disease-free survival. However, with radical surgery many patients with pelvic locally recurrent colorectal cancer may be offered curative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Iversen
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Holm
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Segelman J, Mattsson I, Jung B, Nilsson PJ, Palmer G, Buchli C. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following ileosigmoid or ileorectal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:304-311. [PMID: 29059489 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Reconstruction with an ileosigmoidal anastomosis (ISA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is a surgical option after a subtotal colectomy. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a problematic complication and high rates have been reported, but there is limited understanding of the risk factors involved. The aim of this study was to assess the established and potential predictors of AL following ISA and IRA. METHOD This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients who had undergone ISA or IRA at three Swedish referral centres for colorectal surgery between January 2007 and March 2015. Data regarding clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome were collected from medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the association between patient and treatment related factors and the cumulative incidence of AL. RESULTS In total, 227 patients were included. Overall, AL was detected amongst 30 patients (13.2%). Amongst patients undergoing colectomy with synchronous ISA or IRA (one-stage procedure), AL occurred in 23 out of 120 (19.2%) compared with seven out of 107 (6.5%) after stoma reversal with ISA or IRA (two-stage procedure) (P = 0.004). In addition, the multivariate analyses revealed a statistically significantly lower odds ratio for AL following a two-stage procedure (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.41, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study confirms high rates of AL following ISA and IRA. In particular, a synchronous procedure with colectomy and ISA/IRA carries a high risk of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Segelman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Mattsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B Jung
- Department of Surgery and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Palmer
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Buchli
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nordenvall C, Olén O, Nilsson PJ, von Seth E, Ekbom A, Bottai M, Myrelid P, Bergquist A. Colectomy prior to diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with improved prognosis in a nationwide cohort study of 2594 PSC-IBD patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018; 47:238-245. [PMID: 29064110 DOI: 10.1111/apt.14393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the close relationship between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the association between colectomy and the prognosis of PSC remains controversial. AIM To explore whether colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis is associated with transplant-free survival. METHODS A nationwide cohort study in Sweden including all patients aged 18 to 69 years in whom both PSC and IBD was diagnosed between 1987 and 2014 was undertaken. Each patient was followed from date of both PSC and IBD diagnoses until liver transplantation or death, or 31 December 2014. Patients with colon in situ, and colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis were compared. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS Of the 2594 PSC-IBD patients, 205 patients were treated with colectomy before PSC-diagnosis. During follow-up, liver transplantations were performed in 327 patients and 509 died. The risk of liver transplantation or death was lower in patients treated with colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95) than in patients with colon in situ. Male gender, longer time between IBD and PSC-diagnosis and older age were all associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation or death. Colectomy after PSC-diagnosis was however not associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation or death during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In PSC-IBD patients, colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis is associated with a decreased risk of liver transplantation or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Olén
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Sachs' Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E von Seth
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Division of Hepatology, Karolinska Institutet Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Ekbom
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Bottai
- Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Myrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Bergquist
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Division of Hepatology, Karolinska Institutet Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Saraste D, Martling A, Nilsson PJ, Blom J, Törnberg S, Janson M. Screening vs. non-screening detected colorectal cancer: Differences in pre-therapeutic work up and treatment. J Med Screen 2016; 24:69-74. [PMID: 27470598 DOI: 10.1177/0969141316656216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To compare preoperative staging, multidisciplinary team-assessment, and treatment in patients with screening detected and non-screening detected colorectal cancer. Methods Data on patient and tumour characteristics, staging, multidisciplinary team-assessment and treatment in patients with screening and non-screening detected colorectal cancer from 2008 to 2012 were collected from the Stockholm-Gotland screening register and the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Results The screening group had a higher proportion of stage I disease (41 vs. 15%; p < 0.001), a more complete staging of primary tumour and metastases and were more frequently multidisciplinary team-assessed than the non-screening group ( p < 0.001). In both groups, patients with endoscopically resected cancers were less completely staged and multidisciplinary team-assessed than patients with surgically resected cancers ( p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the screening and non-screening groups in the use of neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer (68 vs.76%), surgical treatment with local excision techniques in stage I rectal cancer (6 vs. 9%) or adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II and III disease (46 vs. 52%). Emergency interventions for colorectal cancer occurred in 4% of screening participants vs. 11% of non-compliers. Conclusions Screening detected cancer patients were staged and multidisciplinary team assessed more extensively than patients with non-screening detected cancers. Staging and multidisciplinary team assessment prior to endoscopic resection was less complete compared with surgical resection. Extensive surgical and (neo)adjuvant treatment was given in stage I disease. Participation in screening reduced the risk of emergency surgery for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Saraste
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Martling
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Blom
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Törnberg
- 2 Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm/Gotland, Sweden
| | - M Janson
- 3 Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nordenvall C, Myrelid P, Ekbom A, Bottai M, Smedby KE, Olén O, Nilsson PJ. Probability, rate and timing of reconstructive surgery following colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease in Sweden: a population-based cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17:882-90. [PMID: 25885419 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 02/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) need colectomy, but the rate of reconstructive surgery with restoration of intestinal continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the probability, rate and timing of reconstructive surgery after colectomy in patients with IBD in a population-based setting. METHOD The study cohort included all patients with IBD in Sweden who underwent colectomy from 2000 to 2009. Each patient was followed from admission for colectomy to admission for reconstructive surgery, date of death, migration or 31 December 2010. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Poisson regression models were used to describe the probability, rate and timing of reconstructive surgery. RESULTS Out of 2818 IBD patients treated with colectomy, 61.0% were male and 78.9% had ulcerative colitis. No reconstructive surgery had been performed in 1595 (56.6%) patients by the end of follow-up. Of the remaining 1223 patients, 526 underwent primary reconstructive surgery and 697 had a secondary reconstruction following a median interval of 357 days from primary surgery in the form of colectomy. The probability of reconstructive surgery was dependent on age (55.6% and 18.1% at ages 15-29 and ≥ 59 years, respectively), and the chance of reconstructive surgery was higher in hospitals that performed more than 13 colectomies for IBD per year [incidence rate ratio and 95% confidence interval 1.27 (1.09-1.49)]. CONCLUSION Fewer than half of the patients having a colectomy for IBD underwent subsequent reconstructive surgery. Older age and low hospital volume were risk factors for no reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Center for Digestive Disease, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Myrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Ekbom
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Bottai
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K E Smedby
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Olén
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Sachs' Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Center for Digestive Disease, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nordenvall C, Ekbom A, Bottai M, Smedby KE, Nilsson PJ. Mortality after total colectomy in 3084 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 40:280-7. [PMID: 24943679 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2014] [Revised: 04/19/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high post-operative mortality has been reported following colectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially in some patient groups. AIMS To investigate the 40-day mortality following colectomy in patients with IBD. The secondary aim was to assess whether colectomised IBD patients have an increased mortality compared to the general population. METHODS This is a population-based register study of all patients with IBD in Sweden who underwent total colectomy in 2000-2010. The cohort was identified using international classification codes for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Patients registered with both UC and CD before colectomy (UCCD) were analysed separately. Each patient was followed-up to the date of death, migration or 31st of December 2010, whichever came first. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards models and relative mortality rates were used to describe mortality. RESULTS In the cohort of 3084 patients, 2424 were diagnosed with UC, 326 with CD and 334 with UCCD. The 40-day, 1-year and 3-year mortality was 1.3%, 3.1% and 6.0%, respectively. The highest 40-day mortality was seen in patients ≥59 years of age (4.4%). Colectomy at the primary hospitalisation for IBD did not significantly increase the risk of post-operative mortality, nor did hospital volume. The relative survival after 3 years was 0.99, 0.98, 0.97 and 0.90 in those <30, 30-43, 44-58 and ≥59 years old, respectively. CONCLUSION The 40-day mortality following total colectomy in IBD patients in Sweden is low, except in patients ≥59 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Glynne-Jones R, Nilsson PJ, Aschele C, Goh V, Peiffert D, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Anal cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014; 25 Suppl 3:iii10-20. [PMID: 25001200 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Instituet and Center for Surgical Gastroenterology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Aschele
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Felettino Hospital, La Spezia, Italy
| | - V Goh
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - D Peiffert
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - D Arnold
- Klinik für Tumorbiologie, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Singh B, Lloyd G, Nilsson PJ, Chaudhri S. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum: the best of both worlds. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 16:73-5. [PMID: 22170251 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-011-0797-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2011] [Accepted: 11/23/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We report a combined laparoscopic and open technique for extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum. The key steps are a laparoscopic rectal dissection limited distally by the coccyx. The open, prone, perineal dissection affords excellent views and allows a cylindrical specimen to be obtained. The resulting perineal defect is closed by a biological mesh. Extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum offers a superior oncological specimen with reduced circumferential resection margin involvement compared to traditional techniques. Combined with a laparoscopic approach, this also has the potential to improve postoperative recovery and reduce morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Singh
- University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
AIM Predictive tools for local recurrence (LR) of rectal cancer are needed. This study assessed the predictive value of tumour budding detected by MNF-116 and laminin-5 γ2 chain (Ln-5 γ2). METHOD In a case-control study, the surgical specimens of 48 patients with LR after from primary resection of rectal carcinoma and 82 control patients matched for gender and preoperative radiation from a population of 1180 patients operated with total mesorectal excision were studied. The presence of budding was examined using immunohistochemistry with Ln-5 γ2 and pan-cytokeratin staining with MNF-116. RESULTS Tumour budding counts ranged from 0 to 106 buds (mean 43, median 38) for all patients. Significantly more tumours with more than 35 buds were seen in the LR than in the control group (67 vs 44%; P = 0.02). The spread of budding was also more extensive in the LR than in the control group (63 vs 49%, P = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis with tumour, node, metastasis stage, MNF-116-stained budding was an independent predictor of local failure (P = 0.02). The budding frequency was higher in irradiated tumours in comparison with tumours that had not received irradiation (mean 53 vs 38, P = 0.03). For Ln-5 γ2, more tumours with ≥ 10 buds were seen in the group with LR than among the control patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (73 vs 57%; P = 0.09). No additive value was found in the multivariate logistic regression model when Ln-5 γ2-stained budding frequency was added to MNF-116 and tumour, node, metastasis stage. The agreement between budding frequency determined by MNF-116 and Ln-5 γ2 was moderate, with a κ-coefficient of 0.34 (0.16-0.51). CONCLUSION Tumour budding determined by MNF-116 staining may serve as a predictive marker for LR in rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Syk
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to identify risk factors for local failure in an effort to optimize treatment for rectal cancer. METHODS A total of 154 patients with local failure after abdominal resection were identified from a population-based consecutive series of 2315 patients who underwent operations for rectal cancer in the Stockholm region between January 1995 and December 2004. Surgeons trained in total mesorectal excision performed the surgery, and preoperative radiotherapy was given according to defined protocols. Data from the 9 hospitals in the region, prospectively registered in a database, were reviewed with regard to tumor location and stage, radiation therapy, surgical treatment, and follow-up. RESULTS In a multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for local failure were distal tumor location and advanced tumor and nodal stage, omission of preoperative radiation, residual disease, and hospitals with lower caseload. Low anterior resection and total mesorectal excision were deployed more often in centers with low failure rates. Discriminators for radiation therapy were patients with male gender, less advanced age, and tumors situated <6 cm from the anal verge. CONCLUSION The variability of patient outcome according to local failure depends on tumor stage, nodal stage, and location. Omission of radiation therapy and surgical performance are important additional risk factors to consider when optimizing treatment for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Syk
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anorectal melanoma is rare and surgery is the recommended primary treatment. There has been some debate whether abdominoperineal resection (APR) or local excision is most appropriate. The aim of this study was to provide a population-based analysis of symptoms, treatment and outcome. METHODS From the Swedish National Cancer Registry, 251 patients with anorectal melanoma were identified from 1960 to 1999. Medical reports were collected and reviewed retrospectively. R0 resection was defined by clear macroscopic margins and a pathology report showing a margin greater than 10 mm. Survival was compared with the log rank test, and Cox multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS APR and local excision was performed in 66 and 86 patients respectively. Median survival after surgery was 14 months, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Seventy-two patients in whom an R0 resection was achieved, irrespective of approach, had a significantly better overall 5-year survival rate than patients with involved margins (19 versus 6 per cent; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed resection status and tumour stage to be independent prognostic variables. CONCLUSION Both APR and LE seem appropriate for anorectal melanoma provided clear margins can be achieved; prognosis is poor regardless of surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Nilsson
- Centre of Surgical Gastroenterology, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nilsson PJ, Rubio C, Lenander C, Auer G, Glimelius B. Tumour budding detected by laminin-5 {gamma}2-chain immunohistochemistry is of prognostic value in epidermoid anal cancer. Ann Oncol 2005; 16:893-8. [PMID: 15821121 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Markers for guidance with regard to individual prognosis and treatment planning are sought in epidermoid anal cancer. This study assessed the prognostic and predictive value of tumour budding. PATIENTS AND METHODS From a population-based consecutive series of patients who were prospectively recorded, it was possible to investigate 209 (76%) of the pretreatment biopsies. Immunohistochemistry with a monoclonal antibody for the gamma2 chain of laminin-5 was used to detect tumour budding (defined as dissociated single cancer cells or clusters of up to five cells). RESULTS Tumour budding was detected in 104 (50%) of the 209 samples. No significant correlation was found between tumour budding and clinicopathological characteristics. Patients with tumour budding had a statistically significantly better 5-year overall survival rate compared with patients lacking tumour budding (74% versus 64%, P <0.05). Albeit not statistically significant, other outcome variables such as tumour-specific survival, recurrence after initial complete response and rate of distant metastases, were all in favour of patients with tumour budding. Multivariate analysis reveals tumour budding as an independent positive prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS Tumour budding detected by laminin-5 immunohistochemistry may be of prognostic value in the treatment of epidermoid anal cancer. However, further studies are needed to clarify the possible clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Nilsson
- Centre of Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the management of isolated locoregional failure after (chemo)radiation therapy for anal epidermoid cancer, salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) is the treatment of choice. The results of a 15-year consecutive population-based series are reviewed. METHODS Details of all patients with anal epidermoid cancer treated from 1985 to 2000 in the Stockholm Health Care Region were recorded prospectively. Among 308 patients with biopsy-proven anal epidermoid cancer, there have been 39 isolated locoregional failures after sphincter-preserving therapy. Thirty-five patients have undergone salvage APR. The medical records of these 35 patients were reviewed retrospectively with regard to surgical and oncological results. RESULTS There were no postoperative deaths. There was considerable morbidity related to the perineal wound, with postoperative perineal infections in 13 patients and delayed healing beyond 3 months in 23 patients. Complications unrelated to the perineal wound were found in 13 patients. The crude 5-year survival rate for the 35 patients was 52 per cent (median follow-up 33 months). Patients with persistent disease fared significantly worse than those with locoregional recurrence (crude 5-year survival rate 33 versus 82 per cent; P < 0.05, log rank test). CONCLUSION Salvage APR in anal epidermoid cancer is associated with a high complication rate but may result in long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Nilsson
- Centre of Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nilsson PJ. Perioperative family nurse clinician: an expanded role. Perioper Nurs Q 1987; 3:30-7. [PMID: 3648782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
25
|
Parsons MT, Nilsson PJ. Nurse-managed gerontological centers. Nebr Nurse 1985; 18:12-5. [PMID: 3852075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
26
|
Nilsson PJ. Making the transition from mom to student. AORN J 1979; 30:674, 676, 678, 680. [PMID: 258986 DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2092(07)61231-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|