1
|
Mirnezami AH, Drami I, Glyn T, Sutton PA, Tiernan J, Behrenbruch C, Guerra G, Waters PS, Woodward N, Applin S, Charles SJ, Rose SA, Denys A, Pape E, van Ramshorst GH, Baker D, Bignall E, Blair I, Davis P, Edwards T, Jackson K, Leendertse PG, Love-Mott E, MacKenzie L, Martens F, Meredith D, Nettleton SE, Trotman MP, van Hecke JJM, Weemaes AMJ, Abecasis N, Angenete E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Barton D, Baseckas G, Beggs A, Brown K, Buchwald P, Burling D, Burns E, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Chang GJ, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Daniels IR, Denost QD, Drozdov E, Eglinton T, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Flatmark K, Folkesson J, Frizelle FA, Gallego MA, Gil-Moreno A, Goffredo P, Griffiths B, Gwenaël F, Harris DA, Iversen LH, Kandaswamy GV, Kazi M, Kelly ME, Kokelaar R, Kusters M, Langheinrich MC, Larach T, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Mann C, McDermott FD, Monson JRT, Neeff H, Negoi I, Ng JL, Nicolaou M, Palmer G, Parnaby C, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Quyn A, Rogers A, Rothbarth J, Abu Saadeh F, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Smart NJ, Smith T, Sorrentino L, Steele SR, Stitzenberg K, Taylor C, Teras J, Thanapal MR, Thorgersen E, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Waller J, Weber K, Wolthuis A, Winter DC, Brangan G, Vimalachandran D, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alahmadi R, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles M, Antoniou A, Armitage J, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Ceelen W, Chan KKL, Chew MH, Chok AK, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Damjanovic L, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Duff M, Egger E, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fahy M, Fearnhead NS, Fichtner-Feigl S, Fleming F, Flor B, Foskett K, Funder J, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Giner F, Ginther N, Glover T, Golda T, Gomez CM, Harris C, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helbren C, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Holmström A, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kaufman M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Kersting S, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Khaw J, Kim H, Kim HJ, Kiran R, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kraft M, Kristensen HØ, Kumar S, Lago V, Lakkis Z, Lampe B, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lynch AC, Mackintosh M, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McGrath JS, McPhee A, Maciel J, Malde S, Manfredelli S, Mikalauskas S, Modest D, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Navarro AS, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, O’Dwyer ST, Paarnio K, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock O, Pfeffer F, Piqeur F, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Oliver A, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Seifert G, Selvasekar C, Shaban M, Shaikh I, Shida D, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Spasojevic M, Steffens D, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Sumrien H, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor D, Tejedor P, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Thaysen HV, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tolenaar J, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner G, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Rees J, van Zoggel D, Vásquez-Jiménez W, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weiser MR, Westney OL, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA. The empty pelvis syndrome: a core data set from the PelvEx collaborative. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae042. [PMID: 38456677 PMCID: PMC10921833 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration (PE), but is undefined. EPS outcome reporting and descriptors of radicality of PE are inconsistent; therefore, the best approaches for prevention are unknown. To facilitate future research into EPS, the aim of this study is to define a measurable core outcome set, core descriptor set and written definition for EPS. Consensus on strategies to mitigate EPS was also explored. METHOD Three-stage consensus methodology was used: longlisting with systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient engagement, and Delphi-piloting; shortlisting with two rounds of modified Delphi; and a confirmatory stage using a modified nominal group technique. This included a selection of measurement instruments, and iterative generation of a written EPS definition. RESULTS One hundred and three and 119 participants took part in the modified Delphi and consensus meetings, respectively. This encompassed international patient and healthcare professional representation with multidisciplinary input. Seventy statements were longlisted, seven core outcomes (bowel obstruction, enteroperineal fistula, chronic perineal sinus, infected pelvic collection, bowel obstruction, morbidity from reconstruction, re-intervention, and quality of life), and four core descriptors (magnitude of surgery, radiotherapy-induced damage, methods of reconstruction, and changes in volume of pelvic dead space) reached consensus-where applicable, measurement of these outcomes and descriptors was defined. A written definition for EPS was agreed. CONCLUSIONS EPS is an area of unmet research and clinical need. This study provides an agreed definition and core data set for EPS to facilitate further research.
Collapse
|
2
|
West CT, West MA, Mirnezami AH, Drami I, Denys A, Glyn T, Sutton PA, Tiernan J, Behrenbruch C, Guerra G, Waters PS, Woodward N, Applin S, Charles SJ, Rose SA, Pape E, van Ramshorst GH, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul AN, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alahmadi R, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles M, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Armitage J, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brown K, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ceelen W, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chew MH, Chok AK, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Damjanovic L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Denost QD, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Drozdov E, Duff M, Egger E, Eglinton T, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fahy M, Fearnhead NS, Fichtner-Feigl S, Flatmark K, Fleming F, Flor B, Folkesson J, Foskett K, Frizelle FA, Funder J, Gallego MA, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Gil-Moreno A, Giner F, Ginther N, Glover T, Goffredo P, Golda T, Gomez CM, Griffiths B, Gwenaël F, Harris C, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helbren C, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Holmström A, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Iversen LH, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kaufman M, Kazi M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Kelly ME, Kersting S, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Khaw J, Kim H, Kim HJ, Kiran R, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kraft M, Kristensen HØ, Kumar S, Kusters M, Lago V, Lakkis Z, Lampe B, Langheinrich MC, Larach T, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Mackintosh M, Mann C, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, McPhee A, Maciel J, Malde S, Manfredelli S, Mikalauskas S, Modest D, Monson JRT, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Navarro AS, Neeff H, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, O’Dwyer ST, Paarnio K, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock A, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Pfeffer F, Piqeur F, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Oliver A, Quyn A, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Seifert G, Selvasekar C, Shaban M, Shaikh I, Shida D, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Smith T, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Spasojevic M, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Sumrien H, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor C, Taylor D, Tejedor P, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Thanapal MR, Thaysen HV, Thorgersen E, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tolenaar J, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner G, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Rees J, van Zoggel D, Vásquez-Jiménez W, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weber K, Weiser MR, Westney OL, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA, Winter DC. Empty pelvis syndrome: PelvEx Collaborative guideline proposal. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1730-1731. [PMID: 37757457 PMCID: PMC10805575 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
|
3
|
Fahy MR, Kelly ME, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles MA, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Beynon J, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ceelan W, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chang M, Chew MH, Chok AY, Chong P, Clouston H, Codd M, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Damjanovich L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Denost Q, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Drozdov E, Duff M, Eglinton T, Enriquez-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fearnhead NS, Ferron G, Flatmark K, Fleming FJ, Flor B, Folkesson J, Frizelle FA, Funder J, Gallego MA, Gargiulo M, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Gil-Moreno A, Giner F, Ginther DN, Glyn T, Glynn R, Golda T, Griffiths B, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Iversen LH, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kazi M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Kiran RP, Kim H, Kim HJ, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kristensen HØ, Kroon HM, Kumar S, Kusters M, Lago V, Lampe B, Lakkis Z, Larach JT, Larkin JO, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Maciel J, Manfredelli S, Mann C, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Marques CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Mehigan BJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, Mikalauskas S, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McCormick P, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, Malde S, Mirnezami A, Monson JRT, Navarro AS, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Ng JL, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, Nugent T, Oliver A, O’Dwyer ST, O’Sullivan NJ, Paarnio K, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock O, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Quyn A, Rajendran N, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Selvasekar C, Shaikh I, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Sorrentino L, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Spasojevic M, Sumrien H, Sutton PA, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor C, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Thaysen HV, Thurairaja R, Thorgersen EB, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Ramshorst GH, van Zoggel D, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Vather R, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Urrejola G, Wakeman C, Warrier SK, Wasmuth HH, Waters PS, Weber K, Weiser MR, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Williams A, Wilson M, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA, Winter DC. Minimum standards of pelvic exenterative practice: PelvEx Collaborative guideline. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1251-1263. [PMID: 36170347 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This document outlines the important aspects of caring for patients who have been diagnosed with advanced pelvic cancer. It is primarily aimed at those who are establishing a service that adequately caters to this patient group. The relevant literature has been summarized and an attempt made to simplify the approach to management of these complex cases.
Collapse
|
4
|
Samuelsson A, Bock D, Prytz M, Block M, Ehrencrona C, Wedin A, Ahlstedt M, Angenete E, Haglind E. Laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in the LapLav study: population-based registry study. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1236-1242. [PMID: 34148084 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard treatment for Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis was resection with or without a stoma, but recent trials have shown that laparoscopic lavage is a reasonable alternative. This registry-based Swedish study investigated results at a national level to assess safety in real-world scenarios. METHODS Patients in Sweden who underwent emergency surgery for perforated diverticulitis between 2016 and 2018 were studied. Inverse probability weighting by propensity score was used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS A total of 499 patients were included in this study. Laparoscopic lavage was associated with a significantly lower 90-day Comprehensive Complication Index (20.9 versus 32.0; odds ratio 0.77, 95 per cent compatibility interval (c.i.) 0.61 to 0.97) and overall duration of hospital stay (9 versus 15 days; ratio of means 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.96) compared with resection. Patients had 82 (95 per cent c.i. 39 to 140) per cent more readmissions following lavage than resection (27.2 versus 21.0 per cent), but similar reoperation rates. More co-morbidity was noted among patients who underwent resection than those who had laparoscopic lavage. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic lavage is safe in routine care beyond trial evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Samuelsson
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Research and Development, NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Prytz
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Research and Development, NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - M Block
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - C Ehrencrona
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A Wedin
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Ahlstedt
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grahn O, Lundin M, Lydrup ML, Angenete E, Rutegård M. Postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and oncological outcomes of rectal cancer. BJS Open 2021; 5:6137422. [PMID: 33609397 PMCID: PMC7893477 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known to suppress the inflammatory response after surgery and are often used for pain control. This study aimed to investigate NSAID use after radical surgical resection for rectal cancer and long-term oncological outcomes. METHODS A cohort of patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2013 in 15 hospitals in Sweden was investigated retrospectively. Data were obtained from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records; follow-up was undertaken until July 2019. Patients who received NSAID treatment for at least 2 days after surgery were compared with controls who did not, and the primary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Cox regression modelling with confounder adjustment, propensity score matching, and an instrumental variables approach were used; missing data were handled by multiple imputation. RESULTS The cohort included 1341 patients, 362 (27.0 per cent) of whom received NSAIDs after operation. In analyses using conventional regression and propensity score matching, there was no significant association between postoperative NSAID use and recurrence-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 0.79 to 1.33). The instrumental variables approach, including individual hospital as the instrumental variable and clinicopathological variables as co-variables, suggested a potential improvement in the NSAID group (HR 0.61, 0.38 to 0.99). CONCLUSION conventional modelling did not demonstrate an association between postoperative NSAID use and recurrence-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, although an instrumental variables approach suggested a potential benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Grahn
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - M Lundin
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - M-L Lydrup
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Region Västra Götaland, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walming S, Asplund D, Bock D, Gonzalez E, Rosenberg J, Smedh K, Angenete E. Quality of life in patients with resectable rectal cancer during the first 24 months following diagnosis. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:2028-2037. [PMID: 32871612 PMCID: PMC7821207 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
AIM An increasing number of patients survive rectal cancer, resulting in more patients living with the side-effects of the treatment. Exploring quality of life before and after treatment enables follow-up and additional treatment to be adjusted to the patient's needs. The aim of the study was to describe the quality of life during the 24 months following diagnosis and to identify risk factors for poor quality of life. METHOD This is a prospective cohort study of patients with rectal cancer followed up by extensive questionnaires. Patients from 16 surgical departments in Denmark and Sweden from 2012 to 2015 were included. The self-assessed quality of life was measured with a seven-point Likert scale. RESULTS A total of 1110 patients treated with curative intent were included, and the response rate at the 24-month follow-up was 71%. Patients with rectal cancer assessed their quality of life before start of treatment as poorer than that of a reference population. At the 12- and 24-month follow-up, the quality of life on group level had recovered to the same level as for the reference population. Risk factors for poor quality of life included bother with urinary, bowel and stoma function. A reference population was used for comparison. CONCLUSION The quality of life of patients with resectable rectal cancer recovered to levels comparable to a reference population 12 and 24 months after diagnosis. Our results indicate that the urinary, bowel and stoma function has an impact on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Walming
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - D. Asplund
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Department of SurgeryRegion Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| | - D. Bock
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - E. Gonzalez
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - J. Rosenberg
- Department of SurgeryHerlev HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenHerlevDenmark
| | - K. Smedh
- Department of SurgeryVästmanland Hospital VästeråsVästeråsSweden
| | - E. Angenete
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Department of SurgeryRegion Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sandberg S, Asplund D, Bisgaard T, Bock D, González E, Karlsson L, Matthiessen P, Ohlsson B, Park J, Rosenberg J, Skullman S, Sörensson M, Angenete E. Low anterior resection syndrome in a Scandinavian population of patients with rectal cancer: a longitudinal follow-up within the QoLiRECT study. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1367-1378. [PMID: 32346917 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common after low anterior resection. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and 'bother' (subjective, symptom-associated distress) of major LARS after 1 and 2 years, identify possible risk factors and relate the bowel function to a reference population. METHOD The QoLiRECT (Quality of Life in RECTal cancer) study is a Scandinavian prospective multicentre study including 1248 patients with rectal cancer, of whom 552 had an anterior resection. Patient questionnaires were distributed at diagnosis and after 1, 2 and 5 years. Data from the baseline and at 1- and 2-year follow-up were included in this study. RESULTS The LARS score was calculated for 309 patients at 1 year and 334 patients at 2 years. Prevalence was assessed by a generalized linear mixed effects model. Major LARS was found in 63% at 1 year and 56% at 2 years. Bother was evident in 55% at 1 year, decreasing to 46% at 2 years. Major LARS was most common among younger women (69%). Among younger patients, only marginal improvement was seen over time (63-59%), for older patients there was more improvement (62-52%). In the reference population, the highest prevalence of major LARS-like symptoms was noted in older women (12%). Preoperative radiotherapy, defunctioning stoma and tumour height were found to be associated with major LARS. CONCLUSION Major LARS is common and possibly persistent over time. Younger patients, especially women, are more affected, and perhaps these patients should be prioritized for early stoma closure to improve the chance of a more normal bowel function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sandberg
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Asplund
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - T Bisgaard
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Surgical Science, University Hospital of Zealand, Køge, Denmark
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E González
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - L Karlsson
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - P Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - B Ohlsson
- Department of Surgery, Blekinge Hospital, Karlshamn, Sweden
| | - J Park
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Rosenberg
- Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S Skullman
- Department of Surgery, Skaraborgs Hospital Skövde, Skövde, Sweden
| | - M Sörensson
- Department of Surgery, Karlstad Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kelly ME, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abecasis N, Abraham‐Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Auer R, Austin KK, Aziz O, Baker RP, Bali M, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Beynon J, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo‐Marulanda A, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chew MH, Chong PC, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Codd M, Collins D, Colquhoun A, Corr A, Coscia M, Coyne PE, Creavin B, Croner RS, Damjanovic L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, Denost Q, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Duff M, Eglinton T, Enrique‐Navascues JM, Espin‐Basany E, Evans MD, Fearnhead NS, Flatmark K, Fleming F, Frizelle FA, Gallego MA, Garcia‐Granero E, Garcia‐Sabrido JL, Gentilini L, George ML, Ghouti L, Giner F, Ginther N, Glynn R, Golda T, Griffiths B, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helewa RM, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Hompes R, Jenkins JT, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Khan MS, Kiran RP, Kim H, Kim HJ, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kristensen HØ, Kroon HM, Kusters M, Lago V, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, Malde S, Mirnezami A, Monson JRT, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, O’Connell PR, O’Dwyer ST, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Quyn A, Radwan RW, van Ramshorst GH, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Regenbogen SE, Renehan A, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Ryan ÉJ, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu V, Selvasekar C, Shaikh I, Hellawell G, Shida D, Simpson A, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Sumrien H, Sutton PA, Swartking T, Taylor C, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Vasquez‐Jimenez W, Verhoef C, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weber K, Weiser MR, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, de Wilt JHW, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, van Zoggel D, Winter DC. Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection for primary rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: results from the PelvEx Collaborative. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1258-1262. [PMID: 32294308 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM At presentation, 15-20% of patients with rectal cancer already have synchronous liver metastases. The aim of this study was to determine the surgical and survival outcomes in patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent combined pelvic exenteration and liver (oligometastatic) resection. METHOD Data from 20 international institutions that performed simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection between 2007 and 2017 were accumulated. Primarily, we examined perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality. We also assessed the impact that margin status had on survival. RESULTS Of 128 patients, 72 (56.2%) were men with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR) 15 years]. The median size of the liver oligometastatic deposits was 2 cm (IQR 1.8 cm). The median duration of surgery was 406 min (IQR 240 min), with a median blood loss of 1090 ml (IQR 2010 ml). A negative resection margin (R0 resection) was achieved in 73.5% of pelvic exenterations and 66.4% of liver resections. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.6%, and 32% of patients had a major postoperative complication. The 5-year overall survival for patients in whom an R0 resection of both primary and metastatic disease was achieved was 54.6% compared with 20% for those with an R1/R2 resection (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection is feasible, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous resection should only be performed where an R0 resection of both pelvic and hepatic disease is anticipated.
Collapse
|
9
|
Schultz JK, Azhar N, Binda GA, Barbara G, Biondo S, Boermeester MA, Chabok A, Consten ECJ, van Dijk ST, Johanssen A, Kruis W, Lambrichts D, Post S, Ris F, Rockall TA, Samuelsson A, Di Saverio S, Tartaglia D, Thorisson A, Winter DC, Bemelman W, Angenete E. European Society of Coloproctology: guidelines for the management of diverticular disease of the colon. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 Suppl 2:5-28. [PMID: 32638537 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The goal of this European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) guideline project is to give an overview of the existing evidence on the management of diverticular disease, primarily as a guidance to surgeons. METHODS The guideline was developed during several working phases including three voting rounds and one consensus meeting. The two project leads (JKS and EA) appointed by the ESCP guideline committee together with one member of the guideline committee (WB) agreed on the methodology, decided on six themes for working groups (WGs) and drafted a list of research questions. Senior WG members, mostly colorectal surgeons within the ESCP, were invited based on publication records and geographical aspects. Other specialties were included in the WGs where relevant. In addition, one trainee or PhD fellow was invited in each WG. All six WGs revised the research questions if necessary, did a literature search, created evidence tables where feasible, and drafted supporting text to each research question and statement. The text and statement proposals from each WG were arranged as one document by the first and last authors before online voting by all authors in two rounds. For the second voting ESCP national representatives were also invited. More than 90% agreement was considered a consensus. The final phrasing of the statements with < 90% agreement was discussed in a consensus meeting at the ESCP annual meeting in Vienna in September 2019. Thereafter, the first and the last author drafted the final text of the guideline and circulated it for final approval and for a third and final online voting of rephrased statements. RESULTS This guideline contains 38 evidence based consensus statements on the management of diverticular disease. CONCLUSION This international, multidisciplinary guideline provides an up to date summary of the current knowledge of the management of diverticular disease as a guidance for clinicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Schultz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - N Azhar
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - G A Binda
- Colorectal Surgery, BioMedical Institute, Genova, Italy
| | - G Barbara
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Biondo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery - Colorectal Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona and IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Chabok
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S T van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Johanssen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - W Kruis
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Lambrichts
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Post
- Mannheim Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - F Ris
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T A Rockall
- Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit (mattu), Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - A Samuelsson
- Department of Surgery, NU-Hospital Group, Region Västra Götaland, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S Di Saverio
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.,Department of General Surgery, ASST Sette Laghi, University Hospital of Varese, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - D Tartaglia
- Emergency Surgery Unit, New Santa Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Thorisson
- Department of Radiology, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden
| | - D C Winter
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - W Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Petersson J, Bock D, Martling A, Smedby KE, Angenete E, Saraste D. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer among the younger population in Sweden. BJS Open 2020; 4:645-658. [PMID: 32484318 PMCID: PMC7397356 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of colorectal cancer in patients aged less than 50 years is increasing in Western countries. This population‐based study investigated the age‐ and sex‐specific incidence of colorectal cancer over time in Sweden, and characterized trends in tumour localization and stage at diagnosis. Methods Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1970 and 2016 were identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry, and categorized by sex, age and tumour location. The incidence and average annual percentage change (AAPC) were estimated and compared between age groups. Results There was an overall increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer between 1970 and 2006, but a decrease in 2006–2016 (AAPC −0·55 (95 per cent c.i. −1·02 to −0·07) per cent). The largest increase in colonic cancer was in 1995–2005 in women aged less than 50 years (AAPC 2·30 (0·09 to 4·56) per cent versus 0·04 (−1·35 to 1·44) and − 0·67 (−1·62 to 0·28) per cent in women aged 50–74 and 75 years or more respectively). Since 1990, rectal cancer increased in patients of both sexes aged below 50 years, with higher AAPC values in women (2006–2016: 2·01 (−1·46 to 5·61) per cent versus 0·20 (−2·25 to 2·71) per cent in men). Younger patients were more likely than those aged 50–74 and 75 years or more to present with stage III–IV colonic (66·2, 57·6 and 49·6 per cent respectively) and rectal (61·2, 54·3 and 51·3 per cent) cancer. From the mid 1990s, rates of proximal and distal colorectal cancer, and rectal cancer were increased in patients aged less than 50 years. Conclusion The overall incidence of colorectal cancer in Sweden decreased in the past decade. However, in patients under 50 years of age the incidence of colorectal cancer – proximal, distal and rectal – continued to increase over
time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Petersson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K E Smedby
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Saraste
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sörensson M, Asplund D, Matthiessen P, Rosenberg J, Hallgren T, Rosander C, González E, Bock D, Angenete E. Self-reported sexual dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:500-512. [PMID: 31713295 PMCID: PMC7317395 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM Patients with rectal cancer often experience sexual dysfunction after treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate sexual function in a prospective cohort of patients regardless of treatment and tumour stage and explore what factors might affect sexual activity 1 year after diagnosis. METHOD The QoLiRECT study (Quality of Life in RECTal cancer) is a prospective study on the health-related quality of life in patients with rectal cancer in Denmark and Sweden. Questionnaires were completed at diagnosis and 1 year. Clinical data were retrieved from national quality registries. RESULTS Questionnaire data were available from 1085 patients at diagnosis and 920 patients at 1 year. Median age was 69 years (range 25-100). At diagnosis, 29% of the women and 41% of the men were sexually active, which was lower than an age-matched reference population. This was further reduced to 25% and 34% at 1 year. Risk factors for sexual inactivity were absence of sexual activity prior to the diagnosis and the presence of a stoma. Women experienced reduced lubrication and more dyspareunia at 1 year compared with the time of diagnosis. In men, erectile dysfunction increased from 46% to 55% at 1 year. CONCLUSION Sexual activity in patients with rectal cancer is lower at diagnosis compared with the population norm and is further reduced at 1 year. The presence of a stoma contributed to reduced sexual activity after operation. Sexual dysfunction was difficult to evaluate due to low sexual activity in the cohort. In men, erectile dysfunction is common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Sörensson
- Department of SurgeryKarlstad HospitalKarlstadSweden
| | - D. Asplund
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Department of SurgeryRegion Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| | - P. Matthiessen
- Department of SurgeryFaculty of Medicine and HealthÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
| | - J. Rosenberg
- Department of SurgeryHerlev HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenHerlevDenmark
| | - T. Hallgren
- Department of SurgeryKarlstad HospitalKarlstadSweden
| | - C. Rosander
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Department of SurgeryRegion Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| | - E. González
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Department of SurgeryRegion Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| | - D. Bock
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - E. Angenete
- Department of SurgerySSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupInstitute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Department of SurgeryRegion Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Karlsson L, Bock D, Asplund D, Ohlsson B, Rosenberg J, Angenete E. Urinary dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:18-28. [PMID: 31334903 PMCID: PMC6973078 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Urinary dysfunction is one of many complications after treatment for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of patient-reported urinary dysfunction at the time of diagnosis and at 1-year follow-up and to assess the risk factors linked to urinary incontinence. METHOD Patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer were included in the QoLiRECT study between 2012 and 2015. Questionnaires from the time of diagnosis and 1-year follow-up were analysed, with 1085 and 916 patients, respectively, eligible for analysis. Regression analyses were made to investigate possible risk factors for incontinence. The patient cohort was also compared with a cohort from the Swedish general population. RESULTS At baseline, the prevalence of urinary dysfunction (14% of women, 8% of men) was similar to that in the general population. At 1-year follow-up, 20% of patients experienced urinary incontinence (29% of women, 14% of men). Emptying difficulties were experienced by 46% (41% of women, 49% of men) and urgency by 58% across both sexes. Abdominoperineal excision and urinary dysfunction at baseline were found to be independent risk factors for incontinence at 1-year follow-up. Among patients who were continent at baseline, risk factors were female sex, physical inactivity at baseline, comorbidity and abdominoperineal excision. CONCLUSION Urinary dysfunction is frequent among patients with rectal cancer, with up to a two-fold increase in symptoms 1 year after diagnosis. Unfortunately, few factors are modifiable and these results stress the importance of informing patients of possible outcomes related to urinary dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Karlsson
- Department of SurgeryInstitute of Clinical SciencesSSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupSahlgrenska Academy at University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - D. Bock
- Department of SurgeryInstitute of Clinical SciencesSSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupSahlgrenska Academy at University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - D. Asplund
- Department of SurgeryInstitute of Clinical SciencesSSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupSahlgrenska Academy at University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Region Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University Hospital/ÖstraDepartment of SurgeryGothenburgSweden
| | - B. Ohlsson
- Department of SurgeryBlekinge HospitalKarlshamnSweden
| | - J. Rosenberg
- Department of SurgeryHerlev HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenHerlevDenmark
| | - E. Angenete
- Department of SurgeryInstitute of Clinical SciencesSSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research GroupSahlgrenska Academy at University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Region Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University Hospital/ÖstraDepartment of SurgeryGothenburgSweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lissel M, Omidy S, Myrelid P, Block M, Angenete E. The Handling of the Rectal Stump Does Not Affect Severe Morbidity After Subtotal Colectomy For Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Scand J Surg 2019; 109:238-243. [DOI: 10.1177/1457496919857269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aims: Colectomy due to ulcerative colitis is associated with complications. One severe complication is the risk for blow-out of the remaining rectal remnant. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency and severity of complications in patients with the rectal remnant left subcutaneously versus patients with the rectal remnant left intra-abdominally. A secondary aim was to identify risk factors for complications. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients at two tertiary centers in Sweden were retrospectively reviewed regarding surgical procedures; complications classified according to Clavien–Dindo; and possible risk factors for complications such as preoperative medication, emergency surgery, and body mass index. Results: 307 patients were identified. Minor complications were more common than previously reported (85%–89%). Severe surgical complications were not related to the handling of the rectal remnant. Leaving the rectal remnant subcutaneously was associated with local wound problems. Risk factors for severe complications were emergency surgery and preoperative medication with 5-aminosalicylic acid. Conclusion: Minor complications after colectomy for ulcerative colitis are very common and need to be addressed. Leaving the rectal stump intra-abdominally seems safe and may be advantageous to reduce local wound morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Lissel
- Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S. Omidy
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P. Myrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M. Block
- Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Department of Surgery, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E. Angenete
- Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Department of Surgery, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bissett I, Keane C, Park J, Bock D, O'Grady G, Öberg S, Rosenberg J, Angenete E. Correspondence. Br J Surg 2019; 106:952-953. [PMID: 31162662 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- I Bissett
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - C Keane
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - J Park
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - G O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - S Öberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Keane C, Park J, Öberg S, Wedin A, Bock D, O'Grady G, Bissett I, Rosenberg J, Angenete E. Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer. Br J Surg 2019; 106:645-652. [PMID: 30706439 PMCID: PMC6590150 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) has a significant impact on postoperative quality of life. Although early closure of an ileostomy is safe in selected patients, functional outcomes have not been investigated. The aim was to compare bowel function and the prevalence of LARS in patients who underwent early or late closure of an ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer. METHODS Early closure (8-13 days) was compared with late closure (after 12 weeks) of the ileostomy following rectal cancer surgery in a multicentre RCT. Exclusion criteria were: signs of anastomotic leakage, diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment and postoperative complications. Bowel function was evaluated using the LARS score and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (BFI). RESULTS Following index surgery, 112 participants were randomized (55 early closure, 57 late closure). Bowel function was evaluated at a median of 49 months after stoma closure. Eighty-two of 93 eligible participants responded (12 had died and 7 had a permanent stoma). Rates of bowel dysfunction were higher in the late closure group, but this did not reach statistical significance (major LARS in 29 of 40 participants in late group and 25 of 42 in early group, P = 0·250; median BFI score 63 versus 71 respectively, P = 0·207). Participants in the late closure group had worse scores on the urgency/soiling subscale of the BFI (14 versus 17; P = 0·017). One participant in the early group and six in the late group had a permanent stoma (P = 0·054). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing early stoma closure had fewer problems with soiling and fewer had a permanent stoma, although reduced LARS was not demonstrated in this cohort. Dedicated prospective studies are required to evaluate definitively the association between temporary ileostomy, LARS and timing of closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Keane
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of AucklandNew Zealand
| | - J. Park
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital ÖstraGothenburgSweden
| | - S. Öberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - A. Wedin
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital ÖstraGothenburgSweden
| | - D. Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital ÖstraGothenburgSweden
| | - G. O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of AucklandNew Zealand
| | - I. Bissett
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of AucklandNew Zealand
| | - J. Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - E. Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital ÖstraGothenburgSweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Johansson N, Rosemar A, Angenete E. Risk of recurrence of sigmoid volvulus: a single-centre cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:529-535. [PMID: 29178415 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Sigmoid volvulus is a condition with a tendency to recur if treated conservatively. Little is known about the best type of treatment or when to perform definitive surgery. The aim of this study was to review treatment, and assess the outcome, of sigmoid volvulus in adult patients treated at a Swedish university hospital. METHOD The medical records of patients treated for sigmoid volvulus at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden from January 2000 to September 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Median follow-up time was 8.3 years. RESULTS One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included with a total of 453 admissions for sigmoid volvulus. Nonoperative decompression was attempted as the initial treatment in 438/453 (97%), with a success rate of 92% (403/438), which was not influenced by whether it was the first episode or a recurrence. Without planned surgery, recurrence occurred after 84% of successful nonoperative decompressions with a median of two recurrences (1-16). Recurrence was less common after the first episode compared with subsequent episodes. Median time until recurrence was 58 days. Mortality after planned surgery following successful decompression was 3.3% (2/61) compared with 13% (6/46) following emergency surgery. CONCLUSION In our cohort, the recurrence rate of sigmoid volvulus following successful nonoperative decompression was high. Still, more than 20% of patients did not experience a recurrence after their first episode. Nonoperative decompression could thus be suggested as the sole treatment for the first episode of volvulus. However, after the second episode it is probable that early planned surgery would improve outcome and reduce health-care consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.,SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A Rosemar
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.,SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ledebo A, Bock D, Prytz M, Haglind E, Angenete E. Urogenital function 3 years after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:O123-O134. [PMID: 29679517 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to explore urogenital dysfunction and associated risk factors after treatment of rectal cancer, in a large national cohort of patients 3 years after abdominoperineal excision, and to compare outcomes with a reference population and a cohort of patients operated for prostate cancer. METHOD Patients treated with abdominoperineal excision in 2007-2009 were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. All consenting patients received a questionnaire. A sample of the Swedish population was contacted and completed a questionnaire. Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in a prospective multicentre trial received questionnaires 24 months after surgery. RESULTS In the abdominoperineal excision, reference and radical prostatectomy populations 72%, 51% and 91% of the questionnaires were returned. Within the abdominoperineal excision group 36% of the men and 57% of the women were incontinent postoperatively. Fifteen per cent and 37% of men and women in the reference group were incontinent. Two years after radical prostatectomy 49% were incontinent. Seventy-four per cent of the men had erectile dysfunction after abdominoperineal excision. Nineteen per cent of the women experienced reduced ability to reach orgasm. Fewer men and women experienced their present sex life as satisfying after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer compared with the reference population. CONCLUSION A large proportion of patients endure persistent urogenital dysfunction after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer as do men after radical prostatectomy. Effects on sexual and urinary function should be part of preoperative information and after surgery patients should be asked about function in order to identify those in need of further assistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ledebo
- Department of Surgery, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Prytz
- Department of Surgery, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Johansson N, Rosemar A, Angenete E. Reply to Atamanalp. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:554. [PMID: 29502341 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- N Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SSORG, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - A Rosemar
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SSORG, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SSORG, Göteborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kohl A, Rosenberg J, Bock D, Bisgaard T, Skullman S, Thornell A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Haglind E. Two-year results of the randomized clinical trial DILALA comparing laparoscopic lavage with resection as treatment for perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1128-1134. [PMID: 29663316 PMCID: PMC6055876 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Background Traditionally, perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis was treated with resection and colostomy (Hartmann's procedure), with inherent complications and risk of a permanent stoma. The DILALA (DIverticulitis – LAparoscopic LAvage versus resection (Hartmann's procedure) for acute diverticulitis with peritonitis) and other randomized trials found laparoscopic lavage to be a feasible and safe alternative. The medium‐term follow‐up results of DILALA are reported here. Methods Patients were randomized during surgery after being diagnosed with Hinchey grade III perforated diverticulitis at diagnostic laparoscopy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with one or more secondary operations from 0 to 24 months after the index procedure in the laparoscopic lavage versus Hartmann's procedure groups. The trial was registered as ISRCTN82208287. Results Forty‐three patients were randomized to laparoscopic lavage and 40 to Hartmann's procedure. Patients in the lavage group had a 45 per cent reduced risk of undergoing one or more operations within 24 months (relative risk 0·55, 95 per cent c.i. 0·36 to 0·84; P = 0·012) and had fewer operations (ratio 0·51, 95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 0·87; P = 0·024) compared with those in the Hartmann's group. No difference was found in mean number of readmissions (1·37 versus 1·50; P = 0·221) or mortality between patients randomized to laparoscopic lavage or Hartmann's procedure. Three patients in the lavage group and nine in the Hartmann's group had a colostomy at 24 months. Conclusion Laparoscopic lavage is a better option for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis than open resection and colostomy. Laparoscopic lavage still an option
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kohl
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - T Bisgaard
- GastroUnit, Surgical Division, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - S Skullman
- Department of Surgery, Skövde Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - A Thornell
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Gehrman
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Walming S, Block M, Bock D, Angenete E. Timely access to care in the treatment of rectal cancer and the effect on quality of life. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:126-133. [PMID: 28777877 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to investigate if a delay in a patient's first contact with a healthcare professional, and any subsequent delay in diagnosis, affected self-assessed quality of life prior to start of treatment for rectal cancer. METHOD Questionnaires were administered when patients had been informed of the diagnosis and planned treatment. The primary end-point was self-assessed quality of life according to a seven-point Likert scale. The response variables were dichotomized and analysed by unadjusted and adjusted binary logistic regression. RESULTS A reported duration of symptoms longer than 4 months was found to be associated with a lower quality of life than a reported duration of symptoms of less than 3 months. Furthermore, a reported period of longer than 2 months from first contact with a healthcare professional to a diagnosis was found to correlate with lower quality of life compared with a period shorter than 2 months. However, when adjusting for possible confounding variables the duration of symptoms and time to diagnosis were not found to affect self-assessed quality of life. Several variables were found to have significant influence in the statistical model, including sense of coherence, the presence of negative intrusive thoughts, comorbidity, depressed mood, male sex and comorbidity. CONCLUSION One conclusion of our study is that further efforts to shorten delay in rectal cancer care with the aim of improving quality of life may be futile. To improve the patient's quality of life at diagnosis other interventions should be considered, such as screening for depression and/or negative intrusive thoughts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Walming
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Block
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Park J, Danielsen AK, Angenete E, Bock D, Marinez AC, Haglind E, Jansen JE, Skullman S, Wedin A, Rosenberg J. Quality of life in a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial). Br J Surg 2017; 105:244-251. [PMID: 29168881 PMCID: PMC5814870 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Revised: 06/05/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background A temporary ileostomy may reduce symptoms from anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection. Earlier results of the EASY trial showed that early closure of the temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to compare health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) following early versus late closure of a temporary ileostomy. Methods Early closure of a temporary ileostomy (at 8–13 days) was compared with late closure (at more than 12 weeks) in a multicentre RCT (EASY) that included patients who underwent rectal resection for cancer. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were signs of anastomotic leakage, diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, and signs of postoperative complications at clinical evaluation 1–4 days after rectal resection. HRQOL was evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months after resection using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐CR29 and Short Form 36 (SF‐36®). Results There were 112 patients available for analysis. Response rates of the questionnaires were 82–95 per cent, except for EORTC QLQ‐C30 at 12 months, to which only 54–55 per cent of the patients responded owing to an error in questionnaire distribution. There were no clinically significant differences in any questionnaire scores between the groups at 3, 6 or 12 months. Conclusion Although the randomized study found that early closure of the temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer complications, this clinical advantage had no effect on the patients' HRQOL. Registration number: NCT01287637 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov). No different after early ileostomy closure
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Park
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A K Danielsen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej, Herlev, Denmark
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A C Marinez
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J E Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - S Skullman
- Department of Surgery, Skaraborgs Sjukhus, Skövde, Sweden
| | - A Wedin
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Rosenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kverneng Hultberg D, Angenete E, Lydrup ML, Rutegård J, Matthiessen P, Rutegård M. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:1908-1914. [PMID: 28687432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2017] [Revised: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been widely used in colorectal surgery due to their opioid-sparing effect. However, several studies have indicated an increased risk of anastomotic leakage following NSAID treatment, although conflicting results exist. The primary goal of this study was to further examine whether postoperative NSAIDs are independently associated with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer during 2007-2013 in 15 different hospitals in three healthcare regions in Sweden were included in the study. Registry data and information from patient records were retrieved. The association between NSAID treatment (for at least two days in the first postoperative week) and symptomatic anastomotic leakage (within 90 days) was evaluated with multiple logistic regression, with adjustment for pertinent confounding factors. RESULTS Some 1495 patients were included in the study. Of these, 27% received postoperative NSAIDs for at least two days in the first postoperative week. Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 11% and 14% in the NSAID and non-NSAID group, respectively. With adjustment for confounders, the odds ratio for leakage among patients who received NSAIDs compared with those who did not was 0.88 (95% CI 0.65-1.20). No differences were seen between non-selective and COX-2-selective NSAIDs. CONCLUSION Postoperative NSAID treatment does not seem to increase the risk of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. NSAID use appears to be safe, but a well-powered randomized clinical trial is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Kverneng Hultberg
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M-L Lydrup
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - P Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - M Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Park J, Gessler B, Block M, Angenete E. Complications and Morbidity associated with Loop Ileostomies in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Scand J Surg 2017; 107:38-42. [DOI: 10.1177/1457496917705995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Background and Aims: Loop ileostomies are frequently used as diversion of the fecal stream to protect a distal anastomosis. The aim of this study was to identify complications and morbidity related to loop ileostomies in patients with ulcerative colitis at a nonemergent setting. Material and Methods: Consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis who received a loop ileostomy at a tertiary referral center in Sweden from January 2006 until December 2012 were included and studied retrospectively. Results: In total, 71 patients were identified, and the median age was 39 years. A majority (94%) of the patients underwent proctectomy or proctocolectomy with primary construction of an ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. In total, 38 patients (54%) had one or more postoperative complications at index surgery. Stoma-related complications were seen in 49% where parastomal skin irritation was most common. In total, 18% of the patients were re-admitted due to morbidity related to the ileostomy, and the leading cause was high volume output. Complications related to closure were seen in 29% of the patients, and of these, 30% required surgical intervention. In total, five patients (7%) developed a symptomatic leakage in the ileo-ileal anastomosis. There was no mortality. Conclusion: Loop ileostomies in this young patient cohort resulted in considerable morbidity. Closure of the ileostomy was also associated with complications. Although the diverting loop ileostomy is constructed to decrease the clinical consequences of an anastomotic leakage, the inherent morbidity should be considered. Preventive measures for parastomal skin problems could improve results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Park
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - B. Gessler
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M. Block
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E. Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Angerås U, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Fürst A, Bonjer J, Haglind E. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1746. [PMID: 27801927 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
25
|
Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angerås U, Cuesta MA, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E. Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg 2016; 103:1746. [PMID: 27801929 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
26
|
Gehrman J, Angenete E, Björholt I, Bock D, Rosenberg J, Haglind E. Health economic analysis of laparoscopic lavage versus Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis in the randomized DILALA trial. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1539-47. [PMID: 27548306 PMCID: PMC5095815 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2016] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open surgery with resection and colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) has been the standard treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis. In recent years laparoscopic lavage has emerged as an alternative, with potential benefits for patients with purulent peritonitis, Hinchey grade III. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic lavage and Hartmann's procedure with health economic evaluation within the framework of the DILALA (DIverticulitis - LAparoscopic LAvage versus resection (Hartmann's procedure) for acute diverticulitis with peritonitis) trial. METHODS Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the DILALA trial and unit costs from Swedish sources. Costs were analysed from the perspective of the healthcare sector. The study period was divided into short-term analysis (base-case A), within 12 months, and long-term analysis (base-case B), from inclusion in the trial throughout the patient's expected life. RESULTS The study included 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic lavage and 40 who had Hartmann's procedure in Denmark and Sweden during 2010-2014. In base-case A, the difference in mean cost per patient between laparoscopic lavage and Hartmann's procedure was €-8983 (95 per cent c.i. -16 232 to -1735). The mean(s.d.) costs per patient in base-case B were €25 703(27 544) and €45 498(38 928) for laparoscopic lavage and Hartmann's procedure respectively, resulting in a difference of €-19 794 (95 per cent c.i. -34 657 to -4931). The results were robust as demonstrated in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION The significant cost reduction in this study, together with results of safety and efficacy from RCTs, support the routine use of laparoscopic lavage as treatment for complicated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Gehrman
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, and, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, and, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - I Björholt
- Nordic Health Economics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, and, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Rosenberg
- Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, and, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Angenete E, Angerås U, Börjesson M, Ekelund J, Gellerstedt M, Thorsteinsdottir T, Steineck G, Haglind E. Physical activity before radical prostatectomy reduces sick leave after surgery - results from a prospective, non-randomized controlled clinical trial (LAPPRO). BMC Urol 2016; 16:50. [PMID: 27531014 PMCID: PMC4986175 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-016-0168-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have reported that early physical rehabilitation after surgical procedures is associated with improved outcome measured as shorter hospital stay and enhanced recovery. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the preoperative physical activity level and subsequent postoperative complications, sick-leave and hospital stay after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in the setting of the LAPPRO trial (LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open). METHODS LAPPRO is a prospective controlled trial, comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open surgery for localized prostate cancer between 2008 and 2011. 1569 patients aged 64 or less with an occupation were included in this sub-study. The Gleason score was <7 in 52 % of the patients. Demographics and the level of self-assessed preoperative physical activity, length of hospital stay, complications, quality of life, recovery and sick-leave were extracted from clinical record forms and questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression, with log-link and logit-link functions, was used to adjust for potential confounding variables. RESULTS The patients were divided into four groups based on their level of activity. As the group with lowest engagement of physical activity was found to be significantly different in base line characteristics from the other groups they were excluded from further analysis. Among patients that were physically active preoperativelly (n = 1467) there was no significant difference between the physical activity-groups regarding hospital stay, recovery or complications. However, in the group with the highest self-assessed level of physical activity, 5-7 times per week, 13 % required no sick leave, compared to 6.3 % in the group with a physical activity level of 1-2 times per week only (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In our study of med operated with radical prostatectomy, a high level of physical activity preoperatively was associated with reduced need for sick leave after radical prostatectomy compared to men with lower physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered at the ISCRTN register. ISRCTN06393679 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - U Angerås
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Börjesson
- Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Ekelund
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - T Thorsteinsdottir
- Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - G Steineck
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Oncology and Pathology, Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16:662-71. [PMID: 24655784 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2013] [Accepted: 03/05/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Colorectal anastomotic leakage is a serious complication. Despite extensive research, no consensus on the most important preoperative risk factors exists. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients operated with colorectal resection. METHOD The databases MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched for prospective observational studies on preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes based on odds ratios (OR) from multivariate regression analyses. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for bias assessment within studies, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for quality assessment of evidence on outcome levels. RESULTS This review included 23 studies evaluating 110,272 patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. The meta-analyses found that a low rectal anastomosis [OR = 3.26 (95% CI: 2.31-4.62)], male gender [OR = 1.48 (95% CI: 1.37-1.60)] and preoperative radiotherapy [OR = 1.65 (95% CI: 1.06-2.56)] may be risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Primarily as a result of observational design, the quality of evidence was regarded as moderate or low for these risk factors according to the GRADE approach. CONCLUSION Based on the best available evidence, important preoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage have been identified. Knowledge on risk factors may influence treatment and procedure-related decisions, and possibly reduce the leakage rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C Pommergaard
- Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angerås U, Cuesta MA, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E. Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg 2014; 101:1272-9. [PMID: 24924798 PMCID: PMC4282093 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2013] [Revised: 08/19/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article reports on patient-reported sexual dysfunction and micturition symptoms following a randomized trial of laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS Patients in the COLOR II randomized trial, comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer, completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CR38 questionnaire before surgery, and after 4 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months. Adjusted mean differences on a 100-point scale were calculated using changes from baseline value at the various time points in the domains of sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, male and female sexual problems, and micturition symptoms. RESULTS Of 617 randomized patients, 385 completed this phase of the trial. Their mean age was 67·1 years. Surgery caused an anticipated reduction in genitourinary function after 4 weeks, with no significant differences between laparoscopic and open approaches. An improvement in sexual dysfunction was seen in the first year, but some male sexual problems persisted. Before operation 64·5 per cent of men in the laparoscopic group and 55·6 per cent in the open group reported some degree of erectile dysfunction. This increased to 81·1 and 80·5 per cent respectively 4 weeks after surgery, and 76·3 versus 75·5 per cent at 12 months, with no significant differences between groups. Micturition symptoms were less affected than sexual function and gradually improved to preoperative levels by 6 months. Adjusting for confounders, including radiotherapy, did not change these results. CONCLUSION Sexual dysfunction is common in patients with rectal cancer, and treatment (including surgery) increases the proportion of patients affected. A laparoscopic approach does not change this. REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00297791 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Andersson
- Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Alingsås Hospital, Alingsås, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Angerås U, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Fürst A, Bonjer J, Haglind E. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial. Br J Surg 2013; 100:941-9. [PMID: 23640671 PMCID: PMC3672685 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Previous studies comparing laparoscopic and open surgical techniques have reported improved health-related quality of life (HRQL). This analysis compared HRQL 12 months after laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a subset of a randomized trial. Methods The setting was a multicentre randomized trial (COLOR II) comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Involvement in the HRQL study of COLOR II was optional. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and EuroQol – 5D (EQ-5D™) before surgery, and 4 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after operation. Analysis was done according to the manual for each instrument. Results Of 617 patients in hospitals participating in the HRQL study of COLOR II, 385 were included. The HRQL deteriorated to moderate/severe degrees after surgery, gradually returning to preoperative values over time. Changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and EQ-5D™ were not significantly different between the groups regarding global health score or any of the dimensions or symptoms at 4 weeks, 6 or 12 months after surgery. Conclusion In contrast to previous studies in patients with colonic cancer, HRQL after rectal cancer surgery was not affected by surgical approach. Registration number: NCT0029779 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Andersson
- Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (SSORG), Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Asplund D, Haglind E, Angenete E. Reply to Stelzner et al. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15:628. [PMID: 23617847 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2013] [Accepted: 02/03/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- D. Asplund
- Department of Surgery; Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra; 416 85; Gothenburg Sweden
| | - E. Haglind
- Department of Surgery; Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra; 416 85; Gothenburg Sweden
| | - E. Angenete
- Department of Surgery; Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra; 416 85; Gothenburg Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
AIM Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal tumours has been introduced to achieve improved local radicality. Fewer positive margins and intraoperative perforations have been reported compared with standard APE. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare short-term complications and results of the two techniques in our institution. METHOD Consecutive patients with rectal cancer undergoing APE between 2004 and 2009 were included. They were divided into two groups of 79 patients in extralevator APE and 79 in standard APE. Patients with recurrence and those having a palliative procedure were excluded. Data were collected from hospital records and the colorectal cancer registry. Main endpoints were wound infection, perineal wound revision, oncological data and length of hospital stay. RESULTS Circumferential resection margin positivity did not differ significantly between groups (17% extralevator APE; 20% standard APE). Intraoperative perforation (13%vs 10%) or local recurrence (seven in each group) were no different. Perineal wound infection was more common after extralevator APE (46%vs 28%, P<0.05) as was perineal wound revision (22%vs 8%, P<0.05). Hospital stay was longer after extralevator APE (median 12 vs 11days, P<0.05). Tumour height (median 4cm) and pTNM classification did not differ. CONCLUSION The results do not show any advantage for extralevator APE. The oncological data were no better and postoperative morbidity was increased. Further studies are needed before extralevator APE is widely adopted in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Asplund
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|