1
|
Bell SK, Folcarelli P, Fossa A, Gerard M, Harper M, Leveille S, Moore C, Sands KE, Sarnoff Lee B, Walker J, Bourgeois F. Tackling Ambulatory Safety Risks Through Patient Engagement: What 10,000 Patients and Families Say About Safety-Related Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes After Reading Visit Notes. J Patient Saf 2021; 17:e791-e799. [PMID: 29781979 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ambulatory safety risks including delayed diagnoses or missed abnormal test results are difficult for clinicians to see, because they often occur in the space between visits. Experts advocate greater patient engagement to improve safety, but strategies are limited. Patient access to clinical notes ("OpenNotes") may help close the safety gap between visits. METHODS We surveyed patients and families who logged on to the patient portal and had at least one ambulatory note available in the past 12 months at two academic hospitals during June to September 2016, focusing on patient-reported effects of OpenNotes on safety knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes. RESULTS A total of 6913 (28%) of 24,722 patients at an adult hospital and 3672 (17%) of 21,579 participants at the children's hospital submitted surveys. Approximately 75% of patients and parents each reported that reading notes helped them understand the reason for both tests and referrals, and approximately 50% felt that it helped them complete tests and referrals. Roughly 75% of participants were more likely to check and understand test results. Overall, 97% of participants reported that trust in the provider, activation, patient-provider goal alignment, and teamwork were each better or the same after reading 1 note or more. Nonwhite participants and those with high school education or less were 30% to 50% more likely to report that reading notes helped them complete tests compared with white and more educated respondents, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the majority of more than 10,000 patients and parents reported reading notes helped them understand and follow through on tests and referrals. As information transparency spreads, OpenNotes can help activate patients and families, facilitate safety behaviors, and forge stronger partnerships with clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patricia Folcarelli
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Moore
- Department of Social Work and Patient/Family Engagement, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kenneth E Sands
- Clinical Services Group, HCA Healthcare, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Barbara Sarnoff Lee
- Department of Social Work and Patient/Family Engagement, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kopanitsa G, Semenov I. Patient facing decision support system for interpretation of laboratory test results. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:68. [PMID: 30029644 PMCID: PMC6053711 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0648-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In some healthcare systems, it is common that patients address laboratory test centers directly without a physician’s recommendation. This practice is widely spread in Russia with about 28% of patients who visiting laboratory test centers for diagnostics. This causes an issue when patients get no help from the physician in understanding the results. Computer decision support systems proved to efficiently solve a resource consuming task of interpretation of the test results. So, a decision support system can be implemented to rise motivation and empower the patients who visit a laboratory service without a doctor’s referral. Methods We have developed a clinical decision support system for patients that solves a classification task and finds a set of diagnoses for the provided laboratory tests results. The Wilson and Lankton’s assessment model was applied to measure patients’ acceptance of the solution. Results A first order predicates-based decision support system has been implemented to analyze laboratory test results and deliver reports in natural language to patients. The evaluation of the system showed a high acceptance of the decision support system and of the reports that it generates. Conclusions Detailed notification of the laboratory service patients with elements of the decision support is significant for the laboratory data management, and for patients’ empowerment and safety. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-018-0648-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgy Kopanitsa
- Institute Cybernetic Center, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenina 30, 634050, Tomsk, Russia. .,Tomsk State University for Architecture and Building, Tomsk, Russia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maillet É, Paré G, Currie LM, Raymond L, Ortiz de Guinea A, Trudel MC, Marsan J. Laboratory testing in primary care: A systematic review of health IT impacts. Int J Med Inform 2018; 116:52-69. [PMID: 29887235 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laboratory testing in primary care is a fundamental process that supports patient management and care. Any breakdown in the process may alter clinical information gathering and decision-making activities and can lead to medical errors and potential adverse outcomes for patients. Various information technologies are being used in primary care with the goal to support the process, maximize patient benefits and reduce medical errors. However, the overall impact of health information technologies on laboratory testing processes has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES To synthesize the positive and negative impacts resulting from the use of health information technology in each phase of the laboratory 'total testing process' in primary care. METHODS We conducted a systematic review. Databases including Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched. Studies eligible for inclusion reported empirical data on: 1) the use of a specific IT system, 2) the impacts of the systems to support the laboratory testing process, and were conducted in 3) primary care settings (including ambulatory care and primary care offices). Our final sample consisted of 22 empirical studies which were mapped to a framework that outlines the phases of the laboratory total testing process, focusing on phases where medical errors may occur. RESULTS Health information technology systems support several phases of the laboratory testing process, from ordering the test to following-up with patients. This is a growing field of research with most studies focusing on the use of information technology during the final phases of the laboratory total testing process. The findings were largely positive. Positive impacts included easier access to test results by primary care providers, reduced turnaround times, and increased prescribed tests based on best practice guidelines. Negative impacts were reported in several studies: paper-based processes employed in parallel to the electronic process increased the potential for medical errors due to clinicians' cognitive overload; systems deemed not reliable or user-friendly hampered clinicians' performance; and organizational issues arose when results tracking relied on the prescribers' memory. DISCUSSION The potential of health information technology lies not only in the exchange of health information, but also in knowledge sharing among clinicians. This review has underscored the important role played by cognitive factors, which are critical in the clinician's decision-making, the selection of the most appropriate tests, correct interpretation of the results and efficient interventions. CONCLUSIONS By providing the right information, at the right time to the right clinician, many IT solutions adequately support the laboratory testing process and help primary care clinicians make better decisions. However, several technological and organizational barriers require more attention to fully support the highly fragmented and error-prone process of laboratory testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Éric Maillet
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Sherbrooke, 150, place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, Canada, J4K 0A8.
| | - Guy Paré
- Information Technology Department, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Leanne M Currie
- School of Nursing University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Louis Raymond
- Institut de recherche sur les PME, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
| | - Ana Ortiz de Guinea
- Information Technology Department, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Strategy and Information Systems Deusto Business School, Universidad de Deusto (Spain).
| | | | - Josianne Marsan
- Department of Management Information Systems, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clarity C, Sarkar U, Lee J, Handley MA, Goldman LE. Clinician Perspectives on the Management of Abnormal Subcritical Tests in an Urban Academic Safety-Net Health Care System. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017; 43:517-523. [PMID: 28942776 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Missed or delayed follow-up of abnormal subcritical tests (tests that do not require immediate medical attention) can lead to poor patient outcomes. Safety-net health systems with limited resources and socially complex patients are vulnerable to safety gaps resulting from delayed management. Clinician perspectives to identify system challenges, vulnerable situations, and potential solutions were sought in focus groups. METHODS Five semistructured focus groups were conducted in 2015 with purposefully sampled clinicians from radiology, hospital medicine, emergency medicine, risk management, and ambulatory care from an urban, academic, integrated, safety-net health system. Thematic analysis identified challenges of current management of abnormal subcritical tests, vulnerable situations, and solution characteristics. A total of 43 clinicians participated. RESULTS Clinicians cited challenges in assigning responsibility for follow-up and identified tests pending at discharge and tests requiring delayed follow-up as vulnerable situations. The lack of tracking systems and missing contact information for patients and providers exacerbated these challenges. Proposed solution characteristics involved protocols to aid in assigning responsibility, reliable paths of communication, and systems to track the status of tests. Clinicians noted a strong desire for integration of the work flow and technology solutions into existing structures. CONCLUSION In an urban safety-net setting, clinicians recommended outlining clear chains of responsibility and communication in the management of subcritical test results, and employing simple, integrated technological solutions that allow for tracking and management of tests. Existing test management solutions should be adapted to work within safety-net systems, which often have fewer resources and more complex patients and may function in the absence of integrated technology systems.
Collapse
|
5
|
Carson-Stevens A, Hibbert P, Williams H, Evans HP, Cooper A, Rees P, Deakin A, Shiels E, Gibson R, Butlin A, Carter B, Luff D, Parry G, Makeham M, McEnhill P, Ward HO, Samuriwo R, Avery A, Chuter A, Donaldson L, Mayor S, Panesar S, Sheikh A, Wood F, Edwards A. Characterising the nature of primary care patient safety incident reports in the England and Wales National Reporting and Learning System: a mixed-methods agenda-setting study for general practice. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThere is an emerging interest in the inadvertent harm caused to patients by the provision of primary health-care services. To date (up to 2015), there has been limited research interest and few policy directives focused on patient safety in primary care. In 2003, a major investment was made in the National Reporting and Learning System to better understand patient safety incidents occurring in England and Wales. This is now the largest repository of patient safety incidents in the world. Over 40,000 safety incident reports have arisen from general practice. These have never been systematically analysed, and a key challenge to exploiting these data has been the largely unstructured, free-text data.AimsTo characterise the nature and range of incidents reported from general practice in England and Wales (2005–13) in order to identify the most frequent and most harmful patient safety incidents, and relevant contributory issues, to inform recommendations for improving the safety of primary care provision in key strategic areas.MethodsWe undertook a cross-sectional mixed-methods evaluation of general practice patient safety incident reports. We developed our own classification (coding) system using an iterative approach to describe the incident, contributory factors and incident outcomes. Exploratory data analysis methods with subsequent thematic analysis was undertaken to identify the most harmful and most frequent incident types, and the underlying contributory themes. The study team discussed quantitative and qualitative analyses, and vignette examples, to propose recommendations for practice.Main findingsWe have identified considerable variation in reporting culture across England and Wales between organisations. Two-thirds of all reports did not describe explicit reasons about why an incident occurred. Diagnosis- and assessment-related incidents described the highest proportion of harm to patients; over three-quarters of these reports (79%) described a harmful outcome, and half of the total reports described serious harm or death (n = 366, 50%). Nine hundred and ninety-six reports described serious harm or death of a patient. Four main contributory themes underpinned serious harm- and death-related incidents: (1) communication errors in the referral and discharge of patients; (2) physician decision-making; (3) unfamiliar symptom presentation and inadequate administration delaying cancer diagnoses; and (4) delayed management or mismanagement following failures to recognise signs of clinical (medical, surgical and mental health) deterioration.ConclusionsAlthough there are recognised limitations of safety-reporting system data, this study has generated hypotheses, through an inductive process, that now require development and testing through future research and improvement efforts in clinical practice. Cross-cutting priority recommendations include maximising opportunities to learn from patient safety incidents; building information technology infrastructure to enable details of all health-care encounters to be recorded in one system; developing and testing methods to identify and manage vulnerable patients at risk of deterioration, unscheduled hospital admission or readmission following discharge from hospital; and identifying ways patients, parents and carers can help prevent safety incidents. Further work must now involve a wider characterisation of reports contributed by the rest of the primary care disciplines (pharmacy, midwifery, health visiting, nursing and dentistry), include scoping reviews to identify interventions and improvement initiatives that address priority recommendations, and continue to advance the methods used to generate learning from safety reports.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Carson-Stevens
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Wales Primary and Emergency Care (PRIME) Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter Hibbert
- Australian Institute for Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Huw Williams
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Huw Prosser Evans
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alison Cooper
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Philippa Rees
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Anita Deakin
- Australian Patient Safety Foundation, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Emma Shiels
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Russell Gibson
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Amy Butlin
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ben Carter
- Centre for Medical Education, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Donna Luff
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gareth Parry
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Meredith Makeham
- Australian Institute for Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul McEnhill
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Hope Olivia Ward
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Raymond Samuriwo
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Anthony Avery
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Liam Donaldson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sharon Mayor
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sukhmeet Panesar
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Centre for Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fiona Wood
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Wales Primary and Emergency Care (PRIME) Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lin JJ, Dunn A, Moore C. Follow-up of Outpatient Test Results: A Survey of House-Staff Practices and Perceptions. Am J Med Qual 2016; 21:178-84. [PMID: 16679437 DOI: 10.1177/1062860605285049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Failure to follow up outpatient test results is a potential patient safety concern; however, data about how house-staff physicians follow up on tests are sparse. The authors sought to assess internal medicine house-staff practices and perceptions regarding the follow-up of outpatient tests and identified barriers to timely follow-up. Seventy-five of 111 eligible house staff at a large urban teaching hospital (68%) completed the survey. Seventy-four percent reported they were sometimes unable to follow up on test results, 78% were at least somewhat worried about inadequate follow-up, and 46% stated that they have seen a patient's medical condition worsen due to a delay in test result follow-up at least a few times a year. Barriers to timely follow-up included lack of a reminder system (40%), difficulty accessing results (24%), too many competing demands on time (27%), and uncertainty about who should follow up on results (16%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny J Lin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients are increasingly being given access to their test results, but little is known about how preferences vary with the test under consideration or the results of the test (normal or abnormal). OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to examine preferences for test result communication. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We surveyed adults to explore their preferences for test result notification for three common diagnostic tests of varying "emotional impact" (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], genital herpes, and cancer biopsy) when test results were 1) normal and 2) abnormal. We conducted our survey between June and August 2012 on the campus of an academic medical center. For each scenario, subjects were asked to rank seven methods that might be used to communicate test results (letter, unsecured email, secured email, text message, telephone call, secure Web portal, office visit) in order of acceptability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main measures were the percentage of respondents who ranked a particular test result notification method favorably and the percentage who ranked it as unacceptable. RESULTS When test results were normal, subjects' notification preferences were generally similar for DXA, herpes and cancer biopsy, with telephone and letter ranked most favorably for all three tests. Conversely, text message and unsecured email were viewed as unacceptable notification methods for normal results by 45.0-55.0 % of subjects across all three tests. When test results were abnormal, office visits became more popular. A higher proportion of subjects ranked office visits as their most preferred notification method for our test with high "emotional impact" (cancer biopsy) (38.4 %) as compared to DXA (28.2 %) and herpes (27.9 %) (P = 0.02). For most test scenarios, younger subjects appeared to rank electronic communication modalities (secure email or Web portal) higher than older subjects, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS Preferences for test result notification can differ substantially depending upon the test under consideration and results of the test. Providers and health care systems should consider these factors when deciding how to communicate results to patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Murphy DR, Wu L, Thomas EJ, Forjuoh SN, Meyer AND, Singh H. Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3560-7. [PMID: 26304875 PMCID: PMC4622097 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.1301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We tested whether prospective use of electronic health record-based trigger algorithms to identify patients at risk of diagnostic delays could prevent delays in diagnostic evaluation for cancer. METHODS We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial of primary care providers (PCPs) at two sites to test whether triggers that prospectively identify patients with potential delays in diagnostic evaluation for lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer can reduce time to follow-up diagnostic evaluation. Intervention steps included queries of the electronic health record repository for patients with abnormal findings and lack of associated follow-up actions, manual review of triggered records, and communication of this information to PCPs via secure e-mail and, if needed, phone calls to ensure message receipt. We compared times to diagnostic evaluation and proportions of patients followed up between intervention and control cohorts based on final review at 7 months. RESULTS We recruited 72 PCPs (36 in the intervention group and 36 in the control group) and applied the trigger to all patients under their care from April 20, 2011, to July 19, 2012. Of 10,673 patients with abnormal findings, the trigger flagged 1,256 patients (11.8%) as high risk for delayed diagnostic evaluation. Times to diagnostic evaluation were significantly lower in intervention patients compared with control patients flagged by the colorectal trigger (median, 104 v 200 days, respectively; n = 557; P < .001) and prostate trigger (40% received evaluation at 144 v 192 days, respectively; n = 157; P < .001) but not the lung trigger (median, 65 v 93 days, respectively; n = 19; P = .59). More intervention patients than control patients received diagnostic evaluation by final review (73.4% v 52.2%, respectively; relative risk, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.58). CONCLUSION Electronic trigger-based interventions seem to be effective in reducing time to diagnostic evaluation of colorectal and prostate cancer as well as improving the proportion of patients who receive follow-up. Similar interventions could improve timeliness of diagnosis of other serious conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Murphy
- Daniel R. Murphy, Louis Wu, Ashley N.D. Meyer, and Hardeep Singh, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine; Eric J. Thomas, University of Texas Houston Medical School and University of Texas Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston; and Samuel N. Forjuoh, Scott and White Healthcare, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple, TX
| | - Louis Wu
- Daniel R. Murphy, Louis Wu, Ashley N.D. Meyer, and Hardeep Singh, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine; Eric J. Thomas, University of Texas Houston Medical School and University of Texas Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston; and Samuel N. Forjuoh, Scott and White Healthcare, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple, TX
| | - Eric J Thomas
- Daniel R. Murphy, Louis Wu, Ashley N.D. Meyer, and Hardeep Singh, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine; Eric J. Thomas, University of Texas Houston Medical School and University of Texas Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston; and Samuel N. Forjuoh, Scott and White Healthcare, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple, TX
| | - Samuel N Forjuoh
- Daniel R. Murphy, Louis Wu, Ashley N.D. Meyer, and Hardeep Singh, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine; Eric J. Thomas, University of Texas Houston Medical School and University of Texas Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston; and Samuel N. Forjuoh, Scott and White Healthcare, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple, TX
| | - Ashley N D Meyer
- Daniel R. Murphy, Louis Wu, Ashley N.D. Meyer, and Hardeep Singh, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine; Eric J. Thomas, University of Texas Houston Medical School and University of Texas Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston; and Samuel N. Forjuoh, Scott and White Healthcare, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple, TX
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Daniel R. Murphy, Louis Wu, Ashley N.D. Meyer, and Hardeep Singh, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine; Eric J. Thomas, University of Texas Houston Medical School and University of Texas Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston; and Samuel N. Forjuoh, Scott and White Healthcare, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kwan JL, Cram P. Do not assume that no news is good news: test result management and communication in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24:664-6. [PMID: 26286472 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Janice L Kwan
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Cram
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Litchfield I, Bentham L, Lilford R, McManus RJ, Hill A, Greenfield S. Test result communication in primary care: a survey of current practice. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24:691-9. [PMID: 26243888 PMCID: PMC4680128 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2014] [Accepted: 06/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background The number of blood tests ordered in primary care continues to increase and the timely and appropriate communication of results remains essential. However, the testing and result communication process includes a number of participants in a variety of settings and is both complicated to manage and vulnerable to human error. In the UK, guidelines for the process are absent and research in this area is surprisingly scarce; so before we can begin to address potential areas of weakness there is a need to more precisely understand the strengths and weaknesses of current systems used by general practices and testing facilities. Methods We conducted a telephone survey of practices across England to determine the methods of managing the testing and result communication process. In order to gain insight into the perspectives from staff at a large hospital laboratory we conducted paired interviews with senior managers, which we used to inform a service blueprint demonstrating the interaction between practices and laboratories and identifying potential sources of delay and failure. Results Staff at 80% of practices reported that the default method for communicating normal results required patients to telephone the practice and 40% of practices required that patients also call for abnormal results. Over 80% had no fail-safe system for ensuring that results had been returned to the practice from laboratories; practices would otherwise only be aware that results were missing or delayed when patients requested results. Persistent sources of missing results were identified by laboratory staff and included sample handling, misidentification of samples and the inefficient system for collating and resending misdirected results. Conclusions The success of the current system relies on patients both to retrieve results and in so doing alert staff to missing and delayed results. Practices appear slow to adopt available technological solutions despite their potential for reducing the impact of recurring errors in the handling of samples and the reporting of results. Our findings will inform our continuing work with patients and staff to develop, implement and evaluate improvements to existing systems of managing the testing and result communication process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Litchfield
- School of Health and Population Sciences, Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Louise Bentham
- School of Health and Population Sciences, Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard Lilford
- Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Richard J McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ann Hill
- Department of Transformation, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK
| | - Sheila Greenfield
- School of Health and Population Sciences, Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Baer HJ, Wee CC, DeVito K, Orav EJ, Frolkis JP, Williams DH, Wright A, Bates DW. Design of a cluster-randomized trial of electronic health record-based tools to address overweight and obesity in primary care. Clin Trials 2015; 12:374-83. [PMID: 25810449 PMCID: PMC4863225 DOI: 10.1177/1740774515578132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care providers often fail to identify patients who are overweight or obese or discuss weight management with them. Electronic health record-based tools may help providers with the assessment and management of overweight and obesity. PURPOSE We describe the design of a trial to examine the effectiveness of electronic health record-based tools for the assessment and management of overweight and obesity among adult primary care patients, as well as the challenges we encountered. METHODS We developed several new features within the electronic health record used by primary care practices affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA. These features included (1) reminders to measure height and weight, (2) an alert asking providers to add overweight or obesity to the problem list, (3) reminders with tailored management recommendations, and (4) a Weight Management screen. We then conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial in 12 primary care practices. RESULTS We randomized 23 clinical teams ("clinics") within the practices to the intervention group (n = 11) or the control group (n = 12). The new features were activated only for clinics in the intervention group. The intervention was implemented in two phases: the height and weight reminders went live on 15 December 2011 (Phase 1), and all of the other features went live on 11 June 2012 (Phase 2). Study enrollment went from December 2011 through December 2012, and follow-up ended in December 2013. The primary outcomes were 6-month and 12-month weight change among adult patients with body mass index ≥25 who had a visit at one of the primary care clinics during Phase 2. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients with a recorded body mass index in the electronic health record, the proportion of patients with body mass index ≥25 who had a diagnosis of overweight or obesity on the electronic health record problem list, and the proportion of patients with body mass index ≥25 who had a follow-up appointment about their weight or were prescribed weight loss medication. LESSONS LEARNED We encountered challenges in our development of an intervention within the existing structure of an electronic health record. For example, although we decided to randomize clinics within primary care practices, this decision may have introduced contamination and led to some imbalance of patient characteristics between the intervention and control practices. Using the electronic health record as the primary data source reduced the cost of the study, but not all desired data were recorded for every participant. CONCLUSION Despite the challenges, this study should provide valuable information about the effectiveness of electronic health record-based tools for addressing overweight and obesity in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather J Baer
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christina C Wee
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katerina DeVito
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E John Orav
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph P Frolkis
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah H Williams
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam Wright
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Bates
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, USA Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Automated critical test result notification system: architecture, design, and assessment of provider satisfaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 203:W491-6. [PMID: 25341163 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.13063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Communicating critical results of diagnostic imaging procedures is a national patient safety goal. The purposes of this study were to describe the system architecture and design of Alert Notification of Critical Results (ANCR), an automated system designed to facilitate communication of critical imaging results between care providers; to report providers' satisfaction with ANCR; and to compare radiologists' and ordering providers' attitudes toward ANCR. MATERIALS AND METHODS The design decisions made for each step in the alert communication process, which includes user authentication, alert creation, alert communication, alert acknowledgment and management, alert reminder and escalation, and alert documentation, are described. To assess attitudes toward ANCR, internally developed and validated surveys were administered to all radiologists (n = 320) and ordering providers (n = 4323) who sent or received alerts 3 years after ANCR implementation. RESULTS The survey response rates were 50.4% for radiologists and 36.1% for ordering providers. Ordering providers were generally dissatisfied with the training received for use of ANCR and with access to technical support. Radiologists were more satisfied with documenting critical result communication (61.1% vs 43.2%; p = 0.0001) and tracking critical results (51.6% vs 35.1%; p = 0.0003) than were ordering providers. Both groups agreed use of ANCR reduces medical errors and improves the quality of patient care. CONCLUSION Use of ANCR enables automated communication of critical test results. The survey results confirm overall provider satisfaction with ANCR but highlight the need for improved training strategies for large numbers of geographically dispersed ordering providers. Future enhancements beyond acknowledging receipt of critical results are needed to help ensure timely and appropriate follow-up of critical results to improve quality and patient safety.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee SH, Song JH, Kim IK, Kim JW. Clinical Document Architecture integration system to support patient referral and reply letters. Health Informatics J 2014; 22:160-70. [PMID: 24963075 DOI: 10.1177/1460458214537510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Many Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) referrals and reply documents have been accumulated for patients since the deployment of the Health Information Exchange System (HIES) in Korea. Clinical data were scattered in many CDA documents and this took too much time for physicians to read. Physicians in Korea spend only limited time per patient as insurances in Korea follow a fee-for-service model. Therefore, physicians were not allowed sufficient time for making medical decisions, and follow-up care service was hindered. To address this, we developed CDA Integration Template (CIT) and CDA Integration System (CIS) for the HIES. The clinical items included in CIT were defined reflecting the Korean Standard for CDA Referral and Reply Letters and requests by physicians. CIS integrates CDA documents of a specified patient into a single CDA document following the format of CIT. Finally, physicians were surveyed after CIT/CIS adoption, and they indicated overall satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Il Kon Kim
- Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Whun Kim
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Baer HJ, Cho I, Walmer RA, Bain PA, Bates DW. Using electronic health records to address overweight and obesity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2013; 45:494-500. [PMID: 24050426 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2013] [Revised: 04/12/2013] [Accepted: 05/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Overweight and obesity are problems of tremendous public health importance, but clinicians often fail to discuss weight management with their patients. Electronic health records (EHRs) have improved quality of care for some conditions and could be an effective mechanism for helping clinicians address overweight and obesity. This review sought to summarize current evidence on the use of EHRs for assessment and management of overweight and obesity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The authors searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, INSPEC, IEEE Explore, and the ACM Digital Library from their inception through August 15, 2012; analyses were conducted between September 2012 and March 2013. Eligible studies had to involve a new feature or a change in an existing feature within an EHR related to the identification, evaluation, or management of overweight and obesity. Included in the review were RCTs and nonrandomized controlled trials, pre-post studies with a historical control group, and descriptive studies. One reviewer screened all of the titles and abstracts. Citations that were potentially eligible were independently reviewed by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Of the 1188 unique citations identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Seven of these studies were conducted in children and adolescents, and four were conducted in adults. Most of the studies were pre-post studies with a historical control group, and only three were RCTs. Most of the interventions included calculation, display, or plotting of BMI or BMI percentiles; fewer included other features. The majority of studies examined clinician performance outcomes; only two studies examined patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Few studies have examined whether EHR-based tools can help clinicians address overweight and obesity, and further studies are needed to examine the effects of EHR features on weight-related outcomes in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather J Baer
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital (Baer, Cho, Bates), Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School (Baer, Cho, Bates), Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard School of Public Health (Baer, Bates), Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Crothers BA, Jones BA, Cahill LA, Moriarty AT, Mody DR, Tench WD, Souers RJ. Quality improvement opportunities in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlations: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 4. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137:199-213. [PMID: 23368862 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0250-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Cytopathology experts, interested stakeholders, and representatives from the College of American Pathologists, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Society of Cytopathology, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Cytotechnology convened the Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference to present preliminary consensus statements developed by working groups, including the Cytologic-Histologic Correlations Working Group 4, using results from surveys and literature review. Conference participants voted on statements, suggested changes where consensus was not achieved, and voted on proposed changes. OBJECTIVES To document existing practices in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlation, to develop consensus statements on appropriate practices, to explore standardization, and to suggest improvement in these practices. DATA SOURCES The material is based on survey results from 546 US laboratories, review of the literature from 1988 to 2011, and the College of American Pathologists Web site for consensus comments and additional survey questions. CONCLUSIONS Cytologic-histologic correlations can be performed retrospectively, during initial case review, or both. At minimum, all available slides should be reviewed for a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test with negative biopsies. The preferred monitor for correlations is the positive predictive value of a Papanicolaou test. Laboratories should design cytologic-histologic correlation programs to explore existing or perceived quality deficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara A Crothers
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Services, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda Maryland 20889-5601, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, Sawhney MK, Smith MW, Murphy DR, Espadas D, Laxmisan A, Sittig DF. Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 20:727-35. [PMID: 23268489 PMCID: PMC3721157 DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Failure to notify patients of test results is common even when electronic health records (EHRs) are used to report results to practitioners. We sought to understand the broad range of social and technical factors that affect test result management in an integrated EHR-based health system. Methods Between June and November 2010, we conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of all primary care practitioners (PCPs) within the Department of Veterans Affairs nationwide. Survey development was guided by a socio-technical model describing multiple inter-related dimensions of EHR use. Findings Of 5001 PCPs invited, 2590 (51.8%) responded. 55.5% believed that the EHRs did not have convenient features for notifying patients of test results. Over a third (37.9%) reported having staff support needed for notifying patients of test results. Many relied on the patient's next visit to notify them for normal (46.1%) and abnormal results (20.1%). Only 45.7% reported receiving adequate training on using the EHR notification system and 35.1% reported having an assigned contact for technical assistance with the EHR; most received help from colleagues (60.4%). A majority (85.6%) stayed after hours or came in on weekends to address notifications; less than a third reported receiving protected time (30.1%). PCPs strongly endorsed several new features to improve test result management, including better tracking and visualization of result notifications. Conclusions Despite an advanced EHR, both social and technical challenges exist in ensuring notification of test results to practitioners and patients. Current EHR technology requires significant improvement in order to avoid similar challenges elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardeep Singh
- Department of Medicine, Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Post-analytical laboratory processes have been considered to be less prone to error than preanalytical processes because of the widespread adoption of laboratory automation and interfaced laboratory reporting. Quality monitors and controls for the post-analytical process have focused on critical result notification, meeting established turnaround time goals, and review of changed reports. The rapid increase in the adoption of electronic health records has created a new role for laboratory professionals in the management of patient test results. Laboratory professionals must interface with the clinical side of the health care team in establishing quality control for post-analytical processes, particularly in high-risk transitions of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy E Walz
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Arkansas State University, PO Box 910, State University, AR 72467, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns contributing to missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers: a process analysis of closed malpractice claims. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27:1416-23. [PMID: 22610909 PMCID: PMC3475819 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2107-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2011] [Revised: 03/19/2012] [Accepted: 04/12/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To erform a process analysis of missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers to identify: (1) the cognitive and logistical factors that lead to these diagnostic errors, and (2) prevention strategies. METHODS Using 56 cases (43 breast, 13 colon) of missed and delayed diagnosis, we performed structured analyses to identify specific points in the diagnostic process in which errors occurred. Each error was classified as either a cognitive error or logistical breakdown. Finally, two physician-investigators identified strategies to prevent the errors in each case. RESULTS Virtually all cases involved one or more cognitive errors (53/56, 95 %) and approximately half (31/56, 55 %) involved logistical breakdowns. The clinical activity most prone to cognitive error was the selection of the diagnostic strategy, both during the office visit (25/56, 45 %) and during interpretation of test results (22/50, 44 %). Arrangement of follow-up visits with a primary care physician (8/29, 28 %) or specialist physician (7/29, 26 %) were especially prone to logistical breakdowns. Adherence to current clinical guidelines could have prevented at least one error in 66 % of cases and assistance from a patient advocate could have prevented at least one error in 48 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns are common among missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers. Prevention strategies should focus on ensuring improving the effectiveness and use of clinical guidelines in the selection of diagnostic strategy, both during office visits and when interpreting test results. Tools to facilitate communication and to ensure that follow-up visits occur should also be considered.
Collapse
|
19
|
Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27:1334-48. [PMID: 22183961 PMCID: PMC3445672 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1949-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2011] [Revised: 09/28/2011] [Accepted: 11/04/2011] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serious lapses in patient care result from failure to follow-up test results. OBJECTIVE To systematically review evidence quantifying the extent of failure to follow-up test results and the impact for ambulatory patients. DATA SOURCES Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Inspec and the Cochrane Database were searched for English-language literature from 1995 to 2010. STUDY SELECTION Studies which provided documented quantitative evidence of the number of tests not followed up for patients attending ambulatory settings including: outpatient clinics, academic medical or community health centres, or primary care practices. DATA EXTRACTION Four reviewers independently screened 768 articles. RESULTS Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and reported wide variation in the extent of tests not followed-up: 6.8% (79/1163) to 62% (125/202) for laboratory tests; 1.0% (4/395) to 35.7% (45/126) for radiology. The impact on patient outcomes included missed cancer diagnoses. Test management practices varied between settings with many individuals involved in the process. There were few guidelines regarding responsibility for patient notification and follow-up. Quantitative evidence of the effectiveness of electronic test management systems was limited although there was a general trend towards improved test follow-up when electronic systems were used. LIMITATIONS Most studies used medical record reviews; hence evidence of follow-up action relied upon documentation in the medical record. All studies were conducted in the US so care should be taken in generalising findings to other countries. CONCLUSIONS Failure to follow-up test results is an important safety concern which requires urgent attention. Solutions should be multifaceted and include: policies relating to responsibility, timing and process of notification; integrated information and communication technologies facilitating communication; and consideration of the multidisciplinary nature of the process and the role of the patient. It is essential that evaluations of interventions are undertaken and solutions integrated into the work and context of ambulatory care delivery.
Collapse
|
20
|
Bell DS, Cima L, Seiden DS, Nakazono TT, Alcouloumre MS, Cunningham WE. Effects of laboratory data exchange in the care of patients with HIV. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81:e74-82. [PMID: 22906370 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2012] [Revised: 07/24/2012] [Accepted: 07/27/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record (EHR) systems are often modified through the addition of new features over time. Few studies have examined the specific effects of such changes. We examined whether implementation of a bidirectional laboratory interface for order entry and data reporting within an existing ambulatory EHR would result in more prompt responses to laboratory indications for antiretroviral therapy (ART) changes or in improved communication with HIV+ patients about relevant laboratory results. METHODS We conducted a single-arm intervention study comparing the timeliness of ART regimen changes, HIV viral load (VL) outcomes and patient-reported assessments of care before and after implementation of a laboratory data exchange interface within an existing EHR, without changing the EHR ordering or results reporting user interface. Patient data was extracted from the EHR covering the period from 1 year before to 2 years after the intervention for a cohort of 1181 patients who had received care during the baseline year. The timeliness of ART changes was represented by the days from a laboratory-result "signal" (CD4 dropping below 350 or 200 or VL increasing by a half-log or to a value over 100,000) to an ART-change "response". Patient assessments of care were collected by interviewing 100 anonymous patients at baseline and another 125 at 2 years post-intervention. RESULTS A total of 171 laboratory "signal" events were followed within 80 days by a change in ART therapy. The mean time from signal to therapy change (adjusted for clustering by patient) initially increased, from 37.7 days during the pre-intervention year to 48.2 days during the quarter immediately following activation of the lab intervention. It then declined to a mean of 31.4 days over the remaining 21 months of observation (P=0.03 for the 6-day improvement from the pre-period). A majority of patients (65%) achieved undetectable VL values by the end of the observation period; faster signal-response times were not associated with greater achievement of undetectable VL. Patients rated communication about laboratory tests more highly after implementation of the interface (91 vs. 83 on a 100-point scale, P=0.01); ratings were not higher for other aspects of care. CONCLUSIONS Adding laboratory data exchange interfaces within existing EHRs holds promise for improving HIV care, both in the timeliness of responses to important laboratory results and in the quality of provider communication about lab tests. However, the benefits from this incremental change may be modest unless more extensive redesign of laboratory follow-up workflows is undertaken, with support from enhanced user interfaces that take advantage of the laboratory information delivered. Providers should also consider increased staffing to compensate for dips in follow-up performance during the initial post-implementation months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas S Bell
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Krüger K, Strand L, Geitung JT, Eide GE, Grimsmo A. Can electronic tools help improve nursing home quality? ISRN NURSING 2011; 2011:208142. [PMID: 22013540 PMCID: PMC3191730 DOI: 10.5402/2011/208142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2011] [Accepted: 08/03/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background. Nursing homes face challenges in the coming years due to the increased number of elderly. Quality will be under pressure, expectations of the services will rise, and clinical complexity will grow. New strategies are needed to meet this situation. Modern clinical information systems with decision support may be part of that. Objectives. To study the impact of introducing an electronic patient record system with decision support on the use of warfarin, neuroleptics and weighing of patients, in nursing homes. Methods. A prevalence study was performed in seven nursing homes with 513 subjects. A before-after study with internal controls was performed. Results. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the seven nursing homes was 18.8%. After intervention, the proportion of all patients taking warfarin increased from 3.0% to 9.8% (P = 0.0086), neuroleptics decreased from 33.0% to 21.5% (P = 0.0121), and the proportion not weighed decreased from 72.6% to 16.0% (P < 0.0001). The internal controls did not change significantly. Conclusion. Statistics and management data can be continuously produced to monitor the quality of work processes. The electronic health record system and its system for decision support can improve drug therapy and monitoring of treatment policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjell Krüger
- Løvåsen Teaching Nursing Home, Municipality of Bergen, Løvåsen 26, 5145 Fyllingsdalen, Norway
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lin JJ, Moore C. Impact of an electronic health record on follow-up time for markedly elevated serum potassium results. Am J Med Qual 2011; 26:308-14. [PMID: 21212448 DOI: 10.1177/1062860610385333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Follow-up of abnormal ambulatory laboratory results is often suboptimal. The impact of an ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) on follow-up of markedly elevated blood potassium (K( +)) results was investigated via a retrospective medical record review-before and after EHR implementation-of patients at an adult primary care practice who had a nonhemolyzed K(+) ≥ 6.0 mEq/L. In all, 188 patients in the pre-EHR group and 30 in the EHR group satisfied inclusion criteria. The mean K(+) for the 2 groups was 6.3 mEq/L. The EHR group had 4.5 times the odds (95% confidence interval = 1.3-15.8) of having their episodes of hyperkalemia followed up within 4 days. Patients in the EHR group were also more likely to have their blood K(+) rechecked within 4 days (63.3% vs 43.6%; P = .044). An ambulatory EHR with a results management system improves documentation and time to follow-up for patients with markedly abnormal lab results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny J Lin
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wald JS, Businger A, Gandhi TK, Grant RW, Poon EG, Schnipper JL, Volk LA, Middleton B. Implementing practice-linked pre-visit electronic journals in primary care: patient and physician use and satisfaction. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17:502-6. [PMID: 20819852 DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.001362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) and EHR-connected patient portals offer patient-provider collaboration tools for visit-based care. During a randomized controlled trial, primary care patients completed pre-visit electronic journals (eJournals) containing EHR-based medication, allergies, and diabetes (study arm 1) or health maintenance, personal history, and family history (study arm 2) topics to share with their provider. Assessment with surveys and usage data showed that among 2027 patients invited to complete an eJournal, 70.3% submitted one and 71.1% of submitters had one opened by their provider. Surveyed patients reported they felt more prepared for the visit (55.9%) and their provider had more accurate information about them (58.0%). More arm 1 versus arm 2 providers reported that eJournals were visit-time neutral (100% vs 53%; p<0.013), helpful to patients in visit preparation (66% vs 20%; p=0.082), and would recommend them to colleagues (78% vs 22%; p=0.0143). eJournal integration into practice warrants further study.
Collapse
|
24
|
Chang KC, Overhage JM, Hui SL, Were MC. Enhancing laboratory report contents to improve outpatient management of test results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17:99-103. [PMID: 20064809 DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m3391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In today's environment, providers are extremely time-constrained. Assembling relevant contextual data to make decisions on laboratory results can take a significant amount of time from the day. The Regenstrief Institute has created a system which leverages data within Indiana Health Information Exchange's (IHIE's) repository, the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), to provide well-organized and contextual information on returning laboratory results to outpatient providers. The system described here uses data extracted from INPC to add historical test results, medication-dispensing events, visit information, and clinical reminders to traditional laboratory result reports. These "Enhanced Laboratory Reports" (ELRs) are seamlessly delivered to outpatient practices connected through IHIE via the DOCS4DOCS clinical messaging service. All practices, including those without electronic medical record systems, can receive ELRs. In this paper, the design and implementation issues in creating this system are discussed, and generally favorable preliminary results of attitudes by providers towards ELRs are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C Chang
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-3012, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yackel TR, Embi PJ. Unintended errors with EHR-based result management: a case series. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17:104-7. [PMID: 20064810 DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m3294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Test result management is an integral aspect of quality clinical care and a crucial part of the ambulatory medicine workflow. Correct and timely communication of results to a provider is the necessary first step in ambulatory result management and has been identified as a weakness in many paper-based systems. While electronic health records (EHRs) hold promise for improving the reliability of result management, the complexities involved make this a challenging task. Experience with test result management is reported, four new categories of result management errors identified are outlined, and solutions developed during a 2-year deployment of a commercial EHR are described. Recommendations for improving test result management with EHRs are then given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Yackel
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Menachemi N, Powers T, Au DW, Brooks RG. Predictors of physician satisfaction among electronic health record system users. J Healthc Qual 2010; 32:35-41. [PMID: 20151590 DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2009.00062.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) have experienced slow adoption rates but play an important role in improving ambulatory quality of care. Sustained use of EHRs is closely related to physician satisfaction, however little research exists on this issue. We focused on physician EHR users to determine factors that are related to satisfaction with the level of computerization in their office practice. After controlling for various factors, physicians with more robust EHRs, and those who adopted their system two or more years ago, were more likely to be satisfied. Lastly, several individual EHR functionalities were independently related to improved satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Menachemi
- Department of Heath Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama, Birmingham School of Public Health, AL, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hysong SJ, Sawhney MK, Wilson L, Sittig DF, Espadas D, Davis T, Singh H. Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17:71-7. [PMID: 20064805 PMCID: PMC2995633 DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m3200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2009] [Accepted: 09/10/2009] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electronic medical records (EMRs) facilitate abnormal test result communication through "alert" notifications. The aim was to evaluate how primary care providers (PCPs) manage alerts related to critical diagnostic test results on their EMR screens, and compare alert-management strategies of providers with high versus low rates of timely follow-up of results. DESIGN 28 PCPs from a large, tertiary care Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) were purposively sampled according to their rates of timely follow-up of alerts, determined in a previous study. Using techniques from cognitive task analysis, participants were interviewed about how and when they manage alerts, focusing on four alert-management features to filter, sort and reduce unnecessary alerts on their EMR screens. RESULTS Provider knowledge of alert-management features ranged between 4% and 75%. Almost half (46%) of providers did not use any of these features, and none used more than two. Providers with higher versus lower rates of timely follow-up used the four features similarly, except one (customizing alert notifications). Providers with low rates of timely follow-up tended to manually scan the alert list and process alerts heuristically using their clinical judgment. Additionally, 46% of providers used at least one workaround strategy to manage alerts. CONCLUSION Considerable heterogeneity exists in provider use of alert-management strategies; specific strategies may be associated with lower rates of timely follow-up. Standardization of alert-management strategies including improving provider knowledge of appropriate tools in the EMR to manage alerts could reduce the lack of timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic test results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia J Hysong
- Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, Sittig D, Arora H, Espadas D, Khan MM, Petersen LA. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 2009; 169:1578-86. [PMID: 19786677 PMCID: PMC2919821 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the fragmentation of outpatient care, timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging results remains a challenge. We hypothesized that an electronic medical record (EMR) that facilitates the transmission and availability of critical imaging results through either automated notification (alerting) or direct access to the primary report would eliminate this problem. METHODS We studied critical imaging alert notifications in the outpatient setting of a tertiary care Department of Veterans Affairs facility from November 2007 to June 2008. Tracking software determined whether the alert was acknowledged (ie, health care practitioner/provider [HCP] opened the message for viewing) within 2 weeks of transmission; acknowledged alerts were considered read. We reviewed medical records and contacted HCPs to determine timely follow-up actions (eg, ordering a follow-up test or consultation) within 4 weeks of transmission. Multivariable logistic regression models accounting for clustering effect by HCPs analyzed predictors for 2 outcomes: lack of acknowledgment and lack of timely follow-up. RESULTS Of 123 638 studies (including radiographs, computed tomographic scans, ultrasonograms, magnetic resonance images, and mammograms), 1196 images (0.97%) generated alerts; 217 (18.1%) of these were unacknowledged. Alerts had a higher risk of being unacknowledged when the ordering HCPs were trainees (odds ratio [OR], 5.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.86-10.89) and when dual-alert (>1 HCP alerted) as opposed to single-alert communication was used (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.22-3.36). Timely follow-up was lacking in 92 (7.7% of all alerts) and was similar for acknowledged and unacknowledged alerts (7.3% vs 9.7%; P = .22). Risk for lack of timely follow-up was higher with dual-alert communication (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.06-3.48) but lower when additional verbal communication was used by the radiologist (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.38). Nearly all abnormal results lacking timely follow-up at 4 weeks were eventually found to have measurable clinical impact in terms of further diagnostic testing or treatment. CONCLUSIONS Critical imaging results may not receive timely follow-up actions even when HCPs receive and read results in an advanced, integrated electronic medical record system. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to improve patient safety in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardeep Singh
- Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Service, Center of Excellence, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wahls TL, Peleg I. Patient- and system-related barriers for the earlier diagnosis of colorectal cancer. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2009; 10:65. [PMID: 19754964 PMCID: PMC2758830 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2008] [Accepted: 09/15/2009] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background A cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients represents an opportunity to study missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis. Primary objective: To study the epidemiology of diagnostic delays and failures to offer/complete CRC screening. Secondary objective: To identify system- and patient-related factors that may contribute to diagnostic delays or failures to offer/complete CRC screening. Methods Setting: Rural Veterans Administration (VA) Healthcare system. Participants: CRC cases diagnosed within the VA between 1/1/2000 and 3/1/2007. Data sources: progress notes, orders, and pathology, laboratory, and imaging results obtained between 1/1/1995 and 12/31/2007. Completed CRC screening was defined as a fecal occult blood test or flexible sigmoidoscopy (both within five years), or colonoscopy (within 10 years); delayed diagnosis was defined as a gap of more than six months between an abnormal test result and evidence of clinician response. A summary abstract of the antecedent clinical care for each patient was created by a certified gastroenterologist (GI), who jointly reviewed and coded the abstracts with a general internist (TW). Results The study population consisted of 150 CRC cases that met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 69.04 (range 35-91); 99 (66%) were diagnosed due to symptoms; 61 cases (46%) had delays associated with system factors; of them, 57 (38% of the total) had delayed responses to abnormal findings. Fifteen of the cases (10%) had prompt symptom evaluations but received no CRC screening; no patient factors were identified as potentially contributing to the failure to screen/offer to screen. In total, 97 (65%) of the cases had missed opportunities for early diagnosis and 57 (38%) had patient factors that likely contributed to the diagnostic delay or apparent failure to screen/offer to screen. Conclusion Missed opportunities for earlier CRC diagnosis were frequent. Additional studies of clinical data management, focusing on following up abnormal findings, and offering/completing CRC screening, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry L Wahls
- VA Iowa City Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Elder NC, McEwen TR, Flach JM, Gallimore JJ. Management of test results in family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7:343-51. [PMID: 19597172 PMCID: PMC2713153 DOI: 10.1370/afm.961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2008] [Revised: 10/08/2008] [Accepted: 10/13/2008] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We wanted to explore test results management systems in family medicine offices and to delineate the components of quality in results management. METHODS Using a multimethod protocol, we intensively studied 4 purposefully chosen family medicine offices using observations, interviews, and surveys. Data analysis consisted of iterative qualitative analysis, descriptive frequencies, and individual case studies, followed by a comparative case analysis. We assessed the quality of results management at each practice by both the presence of and adherence to systemwide practices for each results management step, as well as outcomes from chart reviews, patient surveys, and interview and observation notes. RESULTS We found variability between offices in how they performed the tasks for each of the specific steps of results management. No office consistently had or adhered to office-wide results management practices, and only 2 offices had written protocols or procedures for any results management steps. Whereas most patients surveyed acknowledged receiving their test results (87% to 100%), a far smaller proportion of patient charts documented patient notification (58% to 85%), clinician response to the result (47% to 84%), and follow-up for abnormal results (28% to 55%). We found 2 themes that emerged as factors of importance in assessing test results management quality: safety awareness-a leadership focus and communication that occurs around quality and safety, teamwork in the office, and the presence of appropriate policies and procedures; and technological adoption-the presence of an electronic health record, digital connections between the office and testing facilities, use of technology to facilitate patient communication, and the presence of forcing functions (built-in safeguards and requirements). CONCLUSION Understanding the components of safety awareness and technological adoption can assist family medicine offices in evaluating their own results management processes and help them design systems that can lead to higher quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy C Elder
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Roth CP, Lim YW, Pevnick JM, Asch SM, McGlynn EA. The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record. Am J Med Qual 2009; 24:385-94. [PMID: 19482968 DOI: 10.1177/1062860609336627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The electronic health record (EHR) is seen by many as an ideal vehicle for measuring quality of health care and monitoring ongoing provider performance. It is anticipated that the availability of EHR-extracted data will allow quality assessment without the expensive and time-consuming process of medical record abstraction. A review of the data requirements for the indicators in the Quality Assessment Tools system suggests that only about a third of the indicators would be readily accessible from EHR data. Other factors involving complexity of required data elements, provider documentation habits, and EHR variability make the task of quality measurement more difficult than may be appreciated. Accurately identifying eligible cases for quality assessment and validly scoring those cases with EHR-extracted data will pose significant challenges but could potentially plummet the cost and therefore expand the use of quality assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol P Roth
- RAND Health, Santa Monica, California 90407-2138, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Singh H, Kadiyala H, Bhagwath G, Shethia A, El-Serag H, Walder A, Velez M, Petersen LA. Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:942-52. [PMID: 19293786 PMCID: PMC2921791 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Inadequate follow-up of abnormal fecal occult blood test (FOBT) results occurs in several types of practice settings. Our institution implemented multifaceted quality improvement (QI) activities in 2004-2005 to improve follow-up of FOBT-positive results. Activities addressed precolonoscopy referral processes and system-level factors such as electronic communication, provider education, and feedback. We evaluated their effects on timeliness and appropriateness of positive-FOBT follow-up and identified factors that affect colonoscopy performance. METHODS Retrospective electronic medical record review was used to determine outcomes before and after QI activities in a multispecialty ambulatory clinic of a tertiary care Veterans Affairs facility and its affiliated satellite clinics. From 1869 FOBT-positive cases, 800 were randomly selected from time periods before and after QI activities. Two reviewers used a pretested standardized data collection form to determine whether colonoscopy was appropriate or indicated based on predetermined criteria and if so, the timeliness of colonoscopy referral and performance before and after QI activities. RESULTS In cases where a colonoscopy was indicated, the proportion of patients who received a timely colonoscopy referral and performance were significantly higher post-implementation (60.5% vs. 31.7%, P<0.0001 and 11.4% vs. 3.4%, P=0.0005). A significant decrease also resulted in median times to referral and performance (6 vs. 19 days, P<0.0001 and 96.5 vs. 190 days, P<0.0001) and in the proportion of positive-FOBT test results that had received no follow-up by the time of chart review (24.3% vs. 35.9%, P=0.0045). Significant predictors of absence of the performance of an indicated colonoscopy included performance of a non-colonoscopy procedure such as barium enema or flexible sigmoidoscopy (OR=16.9; 95% CI, 1.9-145.1), patient non-adherence (OR=33.9; 95% CI, 17.3-66.6), not providing an appropriate provisional diagnosis on the consultation (OR=17.9; 95% CI, 11.3-28.1), and gastroenterology service not rescheduling colonoscopies after an initial cancellation (OR=11.0; 95% CI, 5.1-23.7). CONCLUSIONS Multifaceted QI activities improved rates of timely colonoscopy referral and performance in an electronic medical record system. However, colonoscopy was not indicated in over one third of patients with positive FOBTs, raising concerns about current screening practices and the appropriate denominator used for performance measurement standards related to colon cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardeep Singh
- Health Policy and Quality Program, Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, and The Center of Inquiry to Improve Outpatient Safety Through Effective Electronic Communication, both at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Himabindu Kadiyala
- Section of General Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Gayathri Bhagwath
- Section of General Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Anila Shethia
- Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Hashem El-Serag
- Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA, Section of Gastroenterology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Annette Walder
- Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Maria Velez
- Section of Gastroenterology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Laura A. Petersen
- Health Policy and Quality Program, Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, and The Center of Inquiry to Improve Outpatient Safety Through Effective Electronic Communication, both at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lawhorne LW. Managing Laboratory Results in the Nursing Home Setting: Looking for Waldo or Seeking Wisdom. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2009; 10:153-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.12.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
34
|
Shirts BH, Perera S, Hanlon JT, Roumani YF, Studenski SA, Nace DA, Becich MJ, Handler SM. Provider management of and satisfaction with laboratory testing in the nursing home setting: results of a national internet-based survey. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2009; 10:161-166.e3. [PMID: 19233055 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2008] [Revised: 08/25/2008] [Accepted: 08/27/2008] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the management of and satisfaction with laboratory testing, and desirability of laboratory health information technology in the nursing home setting. DESIGN Cross-sectional study using an Internet-based survey. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING National sample of 426 nurse practitioners and 308 physicians who practice in the nursing home setting. MEASUREMENTS Systems and processes available for ordering and reviewing laboratory tests, laboratory test result management satisfaction, self-reported delays in laboratory test result review, and desirability of computerized laboratory test result management features in the nursing home setting. RESULTS A total of 96 participants (48 physicians and 48 nurse practitioners) completed the survey, for an overall response rate of 13.1% (96/734). Of the survey participants, 77.1% had worked in the nursing home setting for more than 5 years. Over half of clinicians (52.1%) reported 3 or more recent delays in receiving laboratory test results. Only 43.8% were satisfied with their laboratory test results management. Satisfaction was associated with keeping a list of laboratory orders and availability of computerized laboratory test order entry. In the nursing home, 35.4% of participants reported the ability to electronically review laboratory test results, 12.5% and 10.4% respectively had computerized ordering of chemistry/hematology and microbiology/pathology tests. The following 3 features were rated most desirable in a computerized laboratory test result management system: showing abnormal results first, warning if a test result was missed, and allowing electronic acknowledgment of test results. CONCLUSION Delays in receiving laboratory test results and dissatisfaction with the management of laboratory test result information are commonly reported among physicians and nurse practitioners working in nursing homes. Test result management satisfaction was associated with computerized order entry and keeping track of ordered laboratory tests, suggesting that implementation of certain health information technology could potentially improve quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian H Shirts
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Buppert C. The Standard of Care for Follow-Up of Noncompliant Patients. J Nurse Pract 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2008.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
37
|
Staes CJ, Evans RS, Rocha BHSC, Sorensen JB, Huff SM, Arata J, Narus SP. Computerized alerts improve outpatient laboratory monitoring of transplant patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15:324-32. [PMID: 18308982 PMCID: PMC2410008 DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m2608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2007] [Accepted: 01/22/2008] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Authors evaluated the impact of computerized alerts on the quality of outpatient laboratory monitoring for transplant patients. For 356 outpatient liver transplant patients managed at LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, this observational study compared traditional laboratory result reporting, using faxes and printouts, to computerized alerts implemented in 2004. Study alerts within the electronic health record notified clinicians of new results and overdue new orders for creatinine tests and immunosuppression drug levels. After implementing alerts, completeness of reporting increased from 66 to >99 %, as did positive predictive value that a report included new information (from 46 to >99 %). Timeliness of reporting and clinicians' responses improved after implementing alerts (p <0.001): median times for clinicians to receive and complete actions decreased to 9 hours from 33 hours using the prior traditional reporting system. Computerized alerts led to more efficient, complete, and timely management of laboratory information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine J Staes
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, (RSE, SMH, SPN, CJS), Salt Lake City, UT,USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nepple KG, Joudi FN, Hillis SL, Wahls TL. Prevalence of delayed clinician response to elevated prostate-specific antigen values. Mayo Clin Proc 2008; 83:439-45. [PMID: 18380989 DOI: 10.4065/83.4.439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the frequency of delayed response to an abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective review of prostate cancer cases diagnosed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005, in a rural Department of Veterans Affairs health care system serving 44,000 veterans across 2 states. Clinician response was defined as a reference to the elevated PSA result in clinical notes, orders for further evaluation, treatment of presumed prostatitis, or a urology visit or referral. Delay was measured as days between an abnormal PSA result and clinician response. RESULTS We identified 327 men who met inclusion criteria with an abnormal PSA value before prostate cancer diagnosis. At first PSA elevation, median age was 64 years; 94% were younger than 75 years. Of the 327 men, 253 (77.4%) had a timely (< or =30 days) response to an abnormal PSA value; 23 (7.0%) had between 31 and 180 days; 24 (7.3%), between 181 and 360 days; and 27 (8.3%), more than 360 days between an abnormal PSA measurement and clinician response. The delayed group had nearly an additional year's (309 days) lapse before completed urologic consultation and prostate gland biopsy (313 days) as compared with the timely group. The presence of urologic symptoms, abnormal results from rectal examination, higher PSA values, and higher PSA velocity (P<.05) were associated with timely clinician response to an abnormal PSA measurement. CONCLUSION In a cohort of men with prostate cancer and an antecedent abnormal PSA value, 15.6% had more than 180 days between an abnormal PSA measurement and clinician response. These findings add to the growing literature demonstrating that missed results occur more frequently than is generally appreciated. Improved systems for clinical data management are needed.
Collapse
|
39
|
Wahls T. Diagnostic errors and abnormal diagnostic tests lost to follow-up: a source of needless waste and delay to treatment. J Ambul Care Manage 2007; 30:338-43. [PMID: 17873665 DOI: 10.1097/01.jac.0000290402.89284.a9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic errors are an important and often underappreciated source of medical error, needless delays to treatment, and needlessly wasted resources. Almost 65% of diagnostic errors have an important contribution of system errors, of which many are an abnormal test result that was lost to follow-up, that is, missed results. These system problems that contribute to missed results may represent low-hanging fruit for those who wish to reduce diagnostic errors in their institution. The rate of missed results and associated treatment delay are discussed. The system factors and human factors that contribute to these errors are discussed along with strategies that can be adopted to reduce these errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry Wahls
- Veterans Administration Iowa City Healthcare System, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nazareno J, Driman DK, Adams P. Is Helicobacter pylori being treated appropriately? A study of inpatients and outpatients in a tertiary care centre. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = JOURNAL CANADIEN DE GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2007; 21:285-8. [PMID: 17505563 PMCID: PMC2657709 DOI: 10.1155/2007/628408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori is causally associated with peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Although effective treatment is available, studies have shown that patients with H pylori are often not well managed. Recently, there has also been increasing awareness of patient safety concerns arising from missed follow-up of abnormal test results. OBJECTIVE To examine whether inpatients and outpatients diagnosed with H pylori receive appropriate treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients who were diagnosed with H pylori by gastric biopsy in London, Ontario between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004, were identified. The hospital charts of these patients were reviewed. Outpatient office charts, clinic notes, pathology reports and endoscopy reports were also reviewed. RESULTS One hundred ninety-three patients were diagnosed with H pylori by gastric biopsy in 2004. Of the 193 patients, 143 (74%) were outpatients and 50 (26%) were inpatients. Overall, 89% of patients received treatment for H pylori. Ninety-two per cent of outpatients were treated, while only 60% of inpatients received treatment (P<0.001). Among the inpatients, the pathology report was available in 40% of the cases before the patient was discharged from the hospital. After discharge from the hospital, 30% of inpatients received appropriate treatment and follow-up. There was no significant difference in treatment whether the patient was admitted to a medical or a nonmedical service. CONCLUSION H pylori is treated relatively poorly in inpatients compared with outpatients. Results of the present study reveal opportunities to improve delivery of care for inpatients on a number of different levels. More research is needed to ensure safety, effectiveness and timeliness in the test result management process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Nazareno
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario
| | - David K Driman
- Department of Pathology, The University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario
| | - Paul Adams
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario
- Correspondence: Dr Paul Adams, 339 Windermere Road, London Health Sciences Centre, University Campus, London, Ontario N6A 5A5. Telephone 519-685-8500 ext 35375, fax 519-663-3549, e-mail
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Woods DM, Thomas EJ, Holl JL, Weiss KB, Brennan TA. Ambulatory care adverse events and preventable adverse events leading to a hospital admission. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16:127-31. [PMID: 17403759 PMCID: PMC2653165 DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most healthcare in the US is delivered in the ambulatory care setting, but the epidemiology of errors and adverse events in ambulatory care is understudied. METHODS Using the population-based data from the Colorado and Utah Medical Practices Study, we identified adverse events that occurred in an ambulatory care setting and led to hospital admission. Proportions with 95% CIs are reported. RESULTS We reviewed 14,700-hospital discharge records and found 587 adverse events of which 70 were ambulatory care adverse events (AAEs) and 31 were ambulatory care preventable adverse events (APAEs). When weighted to the general population, there were 2608 AAEs and 1296 (44.3%) APAEs in Colorado and Utah, USA, in 1992. APAEs occurred most commonly in physicians' offices (43.1%, range 46.8-27.8), the emergency department (32.3%, 46.1-18.5) and at home (13.1%, 23.1-3.1). APAEs in day surgery were less common (7.1%, 13.6-0.6) but caused the greatest harm to patients. The types of APAEs were broadly distributed among missed or delayed diagnoses (36%, 50.2-21.8), surgery (24.1%, 36.7-11.5), non-surgical procedures (14.6%, 25.0-4.2), medication (13.1%, 23.1-3.1) and therapeutic events (12.3%, 22.0-2.6). Overall, 10% of the APAEs resulted in serious permanent injury or death. The proportion of APAEs that resulted in death was 31.8% for general internal medicine, 22.5% for family practice and 16.7% for emergency medicine. CONCLUSION An estimated 75,000 hospitalisations per year are due to preventable adverse events that occur in outpatient settings in the US, resulting in 4839 serious permanent injuries and 2587 deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M Woods
- Institute for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Strandberg EL, Ovhed I, Håkansson A, Troein M. The meaning of quality work from the general practitioner's perspective: an interview study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2006; 7:60. [PMID: 17052342 PMCID: PMC1624837 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2006] [Accepted: 10/19/2006] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background The quality of health care and its costs have been a subject of considerable attention and lively discussion. Various methods have been introduced to measure, assess, and improve the quality of health care. Many professionals in health care have criticized quality work and its methods as being unsuitable for health care. The aim of the study was to obtain a deeper understanding of the meaning of quality work from the general practitioner's perspective. Methods Fourteen general practitioners, seven women and seven men, were interviewed with the aid of a semi-structured interview guide about their experience of quality work. The interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data collection and analysis were guided by a phenomenological approach intended to capture the essence of the statements. Results Two fundamentally different ways to view quality work emerged from the statements: A pronounced top-down perspective with elements of control, and an intra-profession or bottom-up perspective. From the top-down perspective, quality work was described as something that infringes professional freedom. From the bottom-up perspective the statements described quality work as a self-evident duty and as a professional attitude to the medical vocation, guided by the principles of medical ethics. Follow-up with a bottom-up approach is best done in internal processes, with the profession itself designing structures and methods based on its own needs. Conclusions The study indicates that general practitioners view internal follow-up as a professional obligation but external control as an imposition. This opposition entails a difficulty in achieving systematism in follow-up and quality work in health care. If the statutory standards for systematic quality work are to gain a real foothold, they must be packaged in such a way that general practitioners feel that both perspectives can be reconciled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Lena Strandberg
- Blekinge R&D Unit, Erik Dahlbergsv. 30, SE-374 37 Karlshamn, Sweden
- Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Family Medicine, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ingvar Ovhed
- Blekinge R&D Unit, Erik Dahlbergsv. 30, SE-374 37 Karlshamn, Sweden
| | - Anders Håkansson
- Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Family Medicine, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Margareta Troein
- Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Family Medicine, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sung S, Forman-Hoffman V, Wilson MC, Cram P. Direct reporting of laboratory test results to patients by mail to enhance patient safety. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21:1075-8. [PMID: 16836627 PMCID: PMC1831617 DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00553.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Missed test results are common in clinical practice and compromise patient safety. Direct reporting, whereby testing centers systematically notify both patients and providers of important test results, constitutes a potential solution, but provider acceptance is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess provider interest in direct reporting of selected test results and how interest varied across different tests. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Survey of primary care physicians at a tertiary care academic medical center. MEASUREMENT Five-point Likert scores were used to gauge each physician's interest (1 = not at all interested to 5 = very interested) in scenarios pertaining to the direct reporting of 3 diagnostic tests of low (DXA scan), intermediate (genital herpes testing), and high (breast biopsy) "emotional impact" and whether interest varied with each test's result (normal vs abnormal). Physicians were also asked to cite specific advantages and disadvantages of direct reporting. RESULTS The response rate was 73% (148/202). Physician interest in direct reporting decreased progressively as scenarios shifted from low (DXA scan) to high (breast biopsy) emotional impact (P < .001); interest in direct reporting was also higher when results were normal rather than abnormal (P < .001). Common advantages of direct reporting cited by respondents were reductions in workload (selected by 75% of respondents) and reductions in missed diagnoses (38%). The most common concerns were that patients would become unnecessarily frightened (70%) and would seek unreliable information (65%). CONCLUSION Direct reporting of selected test results to patients is one system for insuring that important results are not missed, but implementation should consider the specific test in question, the test result, and provider preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Sung
- University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pezzo MV, Pezzo SP. Physician evaluation after medical errors: does having a computer decision aid help or hurt in hindsight? Med Decis Making 2006; 26:48-56. [PMID: 16495200 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x05282644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors examined whether physicians' use of computerized decision aids affects patient satisfaction and/or blame for medical outcomes. METHOD Experiment 1: Fifty-nine undergraduates read about a doctor who made either a correct or incorrect diagnosis and either used a decision aid or did not. All rated the quality of the doctor's decision and the likelihood of recommending the doctor. Those receiving a negative outcome also rated negligence and likelihood of suing. Experiment 2: One hundred sixty-six medical students and 154 undergraduates read negative-outcome scenarios in which a doctor either agreed with the aid, heeded the aid against his own opinion, defied the aid in favor of his own opinion, or did not use a decision aid. Subjects rated doctor fault and competence and the appropriateness of using decision aids in medicine. Medical students made judgments for themselves and for a layperson. RESULTS Experiment 1: Using a decision aid caused a positive outcome to be rated less positively and a negative outcome to be rated less negatively. Experiment 2: Agreeing with or heeding the aid was associated with reduced fault, whereas defying the aid was associated with roughly the same fault as not using one at all. Medical students were less harsh than undergraduates but accurately predicted undergraduate's responses. CONCLUSION Agreeing with or heeding a decision aid, but not defying it, may reduce liability after an error. However, using an aid may reduce favorability after a positive outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark V Pezzo
- Psychological Sciences Program, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Moore CR, Lin JJ, O'Connor N, Halm EA. Follow-up of markedly elevated serum potassium results in the ambulatory setting: implications for patient safety. Am J Med Qual 2006; 21:115-24. [PMID: 16533903 DOI: 10.1177/1062860605285047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Failure to follow up outpatient test results in a timely manner is a growing patient safety concern. To investigate the follow-up of markedly elevated serum potassium levels in the ambulatory setting, the authors reviewed the medical records of all patients seen in a large primary care practice between September 1, 2003, and August 31, 2004, with potassium levels > or = 5.8 mEq/L. Of the 12,914 serum potassium tests performed, there were 109 cases of markedly elevated serum potassium levels in 86 patients. The median potassium level was 5.9 mEq/L (range, 5.8-7.3). More than half the patients were recalled to the clinic specifically for repeat testing; however, 25% of patients had no repeat tests until they were seen at routine follow-up visits. The median time to a repeat potassium level was 6 days (range, 0-445). Patients > or = 65 years old had a lower likelihood of having repeat testing within 1 week (odds ratio = 0.38, P = .03).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlton R Moore
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bates DW. David Westfall Bates, MD: a conversation with the editor on improving patient safety, quality of care, and outcomes by using information technology. Interview by William Clifford Roberts. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2005; 18:158-64. [PMID: 16200166 PMCID: PMC1200718 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2005.11928056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
47
|
|
48
|
Sequist TD, Gandhi TK, Karson AS, Fiskio JM, Bugbee D, Sperling M, Cook EF, Orav EJ, Fairchild DG, Bates DW. A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12:431-7. [PMID: 15802479 PMCID: PMC1174888 DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2004] [Accepted: 03/23/2005] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an integrated patient-specific electronic clinical reminder system on diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) care and to assess physician attitudes toward this reminder system. DESIGN We enrolled 194 primary care physicians caring for 4549 patients with diabetes and 2199 patients with CAD at 20 ambulatory clinics. Clinics were randomized so that physicians received either evidence-based electronic reminders within their patients' electronic medical record or usual care. There were five reminders for diabetes care and four reminders for CAD care. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was receipt of recommended care for diabetes and CAD. We created a summary outcome to assess the odds of increased compliance with overall diabetes care (based on five measures) and overall CAD care (based on four measures). We surveyed physicians to assess attitudes toward the reminder system. RESULTS Baseline adherence rates to all quality measures were low. While electronic reminders increased the odds of recommended diabetes care (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.67) and CAD (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55), the impact of individual reminders was variable. A total of three of nine reminders effectively increased rates of recommended care for diabetes or CAD. The majority of physicians (76%) thought that reminders improved quality of care. CONCLUSION An integrated electronic reminder system resulted in variable improvement in care for diabetes and CAD. These improvements were often limited and quality gaps persist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D Sequist
- Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medcal School, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Poon EG, Wang SJ, Gandhi TK, Bates DW, Kuperman GJ. Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager. J Biomed Inform 2004; 36:80-91. [PMID: 14552849 DOI: 10.1016/s1532-0464(03)00061-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Prior research has demonstrated that clinicians often fail to review and act upon outpatient test results in a timely and appropriate manner. To address this patient safety and quality of care issue, Partners Healthcare has developed a browser-based, provider-centric, comprehensive results management application to help clinic physicians review and act upon test results in a safe, reliable, and efficient manner. The application, called the Results Manager, incorporates extensive decision support features to classify the degree of abnormality for each result, presents guidelines to help clinicians manage abnormal results, allows clinicians to generate result letters to patients with predefined, context-sensitive templates and prompts physicians to set reminders for future testing. In this paper, we outline the design process and functionality of Results Manager. We also discuss its underlying architectural design, which revolves around a clinical event monitor and a rules engine, and the methodological challenges encountered in designing this application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric G Poon
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Poon EG, Haas JS, Louise Puopolo A, Gandhi TK, Burdick E, Bates DW, Brennan TA. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19:316-23. [PMID: 15061740 PMCID: PMC1492194 DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30357.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the communication factors that are significantly associated with appropriate short-term follow-up of abnormal mammograms. DESIGN Prospective longitudinal study involving medical record review and patient survey. SETTING Ten academically affiliated ambulatory medical practices in the Boston metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS One hundred twenty-six women with abnormal mammograms requiring short-term (6 months) follow-up imaging. MEASUREMENTS Proportion of women in the study who received appropriate follow-up care. RESULTS Eighty-one (64%) of the women with abnormal mammograms requiring short-term follow-up imaging received the appropriate follow-up care. After adjusting for patients' age and insurance status, 2 communication factors were found to be independently associated with the delivery of appropriate follow-up care: 1). physicians' documentation of a follow-up plan in the medical record (adjusted odds ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 6.98; P =.029); and 2). patients' understanding of the need for follow-up (adjusted odds ratio, 3.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.50 to 9.96; P =.006). None of the patients' clinical or psychological characteristics were associated with the delivery of appropriate follow-up care. CONCLUSIONS Follow-up care for women with abnormal mammograms requiring short-term follow-up imaging is suboptimal. Documentation of the follow-up plan by the physician and understanding of the follow-up plan by the patient are important factors that are correlated with the receipt of appropriate follow-up care for these women. Interventions designed to improve the quality of result follow-up in the outpatient setting should address these issues in patient-doctor communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric G Poon
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|