The electrical and magnetical cerebral responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the esophagus and the location of their cerebral sources

The "human visceral homunculus" to pain evoked in the oesophagus, stomach, duodenum and sigmoid colon

The oesophagus, stomach, duodenum and sigmoid colon were electrically stimulated in 12 healthy volunteers with a thin nasal endoscope. The painful cortical evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded from 64 surface electrodes. The early EPs with latencies < 200 ms were studied and the corresponding dipole sources were calculated. The electrical current intensities needed to evoke pain were highest in the stomach and duodenum, compared to the other segments (F = 7.8; P < 0.001; post hoc analysis P < 0.05). The EP latencies after stimulation of the stomach and sigmoid colon were shorter compared with those to stimulation of the oesophagus and duodenum (all P values < 0.001). The EP amplitudes were higher to oesophagus stimulation (all P values < 0.001 except for the early positivity). The potential fields obtained after stimulation of the most distal segments (duodenum and sigmoid colon) were in general distributed more posteriorly compared to those recorded in the more proximal regions. The EP topographies to stimulation of all gut tracts were explained by a bilateral source in the second somatosensory (SII) area, by a dipole in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and by a bilateral generator in the insular cortex. However, the position of the sources significantly changed depending on the stimulated gut tract. Moreover, while the SII and ACC sources were initially activated to oesophagus and stomach stimulation, the ACC and insular activities were the earliest ones after stimulation of the lower gut segments. The findings reflect differences in pathways and brain processing of visceral nociceptive inputs coming from either upper or lower gut and may improve our understanding of the brain-gut axis in health and disease.

Cortical changes to experimental sensitization of the human esophagus

Topographical organization in the neocortex shows experience-dependent plasticity. We hypothesized that experimental sensitization of the esophagus results in changes of the topographical distribution of the evoked potentials and the corresponding dipole source activities to painful stimulation. An endoscopic method was used to deliver 35 electrical stimuli at the pain threshold to a fixed area of the mucosa in 10 healthy volunteer men and women. The stimulations were repeated after 30 min (reproducibility experiment), and after 60 min following perfusion of 200 ml 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (sensitization experiment). During stimulation the electroencephalogram was recorded from 64 surface electrodes. The sensitization resulted in a decrease in the pain threshold (F=6.2; P=0.004). The topographic distribution of the evoked potentials showed reproducible negative (N1, N2) and positive (P1, P2) components. After acid perfusion a reduced latency and a change in localization was seen for the P1 subdivided into frontal and occipital components (F=29.5, P<0.001; F=53.7, P<0.001). Furthermore the sensitization resulted in a reduction of the latency for P2 (F=6.2, P=0.009). The source analysis showed consistent dipolar activity in the bilateral opercular-insular cortex before and after acid perfusion. For the anterior cingulate dipole there was a reduction in latency (P=0.03) and a posterior shift (P=0.0002) following acid perfusion. The findings indicate that short-term sensitization of the esophagus results in central neuroplastic changes involving the cingulate gyrus, which also showed pathological activation in functional diseases of the gut, thus reflecting the importance of this region in visceral pain and hyperalgesia.

Innervation of the mammalian esophagus

Understanding the innervation of the esophagus is a prerequisite for successful treatment of a variety of disorders, e.g., dysphagia, achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and non-cardiac chest pain. Although, at first glance, functions of the esophagus are relatively simple, their neuronal control is considerably complex. Vagal motor neurons of the nucleus ambiguus and preganglionic neurons of the dorsal motor nucleus innervate striated and smooth muscle, respectively. Myenteric neurons represent the interface between the dorsal motor nucleus and smooth muscle but they are also involved in striated muscle innervation. Intraganglionic laminar endings (IGLEs) represent mechanosensory vagal afferent terminals. They also establish intricate connections with enteric neurons. Afferent information is implemented by the swallowing central pattern generator in the brainstem, which generates and coordinates deglutitive activity in both striated and smooth esophageal muscle and orchestrates esophageal sphincters as well as gastric adaptive relaxation. Disturbed excitation/inhibition balance in the lower esophageal sphincter results in motility disorders, e.g., achalasia and GERD. Loss of mechanosensory afferents disrupts adaptation of deglutitive motor programs to bolus variables, eventually leading to megaesophagus. Both spinal and vagal afferents appear to contribute to painful sensations, e.g., non-cardiac chest pain. Extrinsic and intrinsic neurons may be involved in intramural reflexes using acetylcholine, nitric oxide, substance P, CGRP and glutamate as main transmitters. In addition, other molecules, e.g., ATP, GABA and probably also inflammatory cytokines, may modulate these neuronal functions.

Assessment of gastrointestinal sensation--a review

Understanding the mechanisms of symptoms in patients with gastrointestinal disorders remains a great challenge. One of the major problems facing clinicians in this area is the limited information gained from subjective outcome measures commonly used to assess these conditions. To address this, various stimulation and recording techniques, commonly used by neurologists, have been adapted to study gastrointestinal sensory processing. This review article provides an overview of this expanding research area and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Neurophysiologic assessment of esophageal sensory processing in noncardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal hypersensitivity is thought to be important in the generation and maintenance of symptoms in noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). In this study, we explored the neurophysiologic basis of esophageal hypersensitivity in a cohort of NCCP patients.

METHODS

We studied 12 healthy controls (9 women; mean age, 37.1 +/- 8.7 y) and 32 NCCP patients (23 women; mean age, 47.2 +/- 10 y). All had esophageal manometry, esophageal evoked potentials to electrical stimulation, and NCCP patients had 24-hour ambulatory pH testing.

RESULTS

The NCCP patients had reduced pain thresholds (PT) (72.1 +/- 19.4 vs 54.2 +/- 23.6, P = .02) and increased P1 latencies (P1 = 105.5 +/- 11.1 vs 118.1 +/- 23.4, P = .02). Subanalysis showed that the NCCP group could be divided into 3 distinct phenotypic classifications. Group 1 had reduced pain thresholds in conjunction with normal/reduced latency P1 latencies (n = 9). Group 2 had reduced pain thresholds in conjunction with increased (>2.5 SD) P1 latencies (n = 7), and group 3 had normal pain thresholds in conjunction with either normal (n = 10) or increased (>2.5 SD, n = 3) P1 latencies.

CONCLUSIONS

Normal esophageal evoked potential latencies with reduced PT, as seen in group 1 patients, is indicative of enhanced afferent transmission and therefore increased esophageal afferent pathway sensitivity. Increased esophageal evoked potential latencies with reduced PT in group 2 patients implies normal afferent transmission to the cortex but heightened secondary cortical processing of this information, most likely owing to psychologic factors such as hypervigilance. This study shows that NCCP patients with esophageal hypersensitivity may be subclassified into distinct phenotypic subclasses based on sensory responsiveness and objective neurophysiologic profiles.

Brain structures involved in interoceptive awareness and cardioafferent signal processing: a dipole source localization study

Afferent signals from the body play an important role for emotional and motivational aspects of behavior. Nevertheless, little is known about the cortical and subcortical structures involved in interoceptive processes. Recently, a functional MRI study demonstrated that insula, somatomotor, and cingulated cortices are activated when subjects focus attention on their heartbeats. Aside from the use of imaging data, cardiac awareness has frequently been studied by using the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP), a brain wave that appears contingent on the heartbeat. The present study aimed at localizing sources of the HEP. Multichannel EEG was recorded in 44 subjects while they performed a heartbeat perception task. This task was used to quantify interoceptive awareness and to subdivide the subjects into good and poor heartbeat perceivers. Analyses showed highest HEP amplitudes over frontal and frontocentral electrode locations in the time range of later than 200 ms after R-wave onset. By means of a BESA dipole-source-analysis, four sources of the HEP were identified which were located in the anterior cingulate, the right insula, the prefrontal cortex, and the left secondary somatosensory cortex. Good heartbeat perceivers showed both significantly higher HEP amplitudes and higher dipole strength than poor heartbeat perceivers in all four cortical sources. We conclude that the identified structures are involved in the processing of cardiac signals, whereby anterior cingulate and right insula seem to serve as interoceptive centers for cardioception.

The cardiac cycle time effect revisited: temporal dynamics of the central-vagal modulation of heart rate in human reaction time tasks

Lacey and Lacey (1974) suggested that during reaction time tasks higher brain centers dynamically adjust efferent vagal nerve pulses to the sino-atrial node of the heart, inducing phase-dependent heart rate changes. Since then, animal and human neuro-physiological results have provided evidence for this hypothesis. Higher subcortical and cortical brain centers may have reciprocal interactive pathways relating to autonomic control comparable to those at the level of peripheral autonomic changes and brain stem reflexes. In humans such central effects may be observed in the short latency vagal control of heart rate that has been studied mostly in reaction time (RT) tasks. RT task parameters modulate vagal pulses to the cardiac sino-atrial node (SAN), which in turn exerts a phase-dependent change in the ongoing cardiac interbeat interval. Simulations of human RT task effects in an animal model of heart rate change support this hypothesis. The current study examined evidence for vagal control of three human phasic heart rate responses in RT tasks. The evidence indicates that the initiation of an RT response triggers a reflexive shift from vagal activation to vagal inhibition. This shift is cardiac cycle phase dependent. Graded anticipatory cardiac deceleration during the warning interval of an RT task varies with task relevance and time uncertainty. This response may be part of a control process engaged in time keeping. Hence, temporal variables mediate the central-autonomic-vagal modulation of heart rate.

Brain processing of esophageal sensation in health and disease

This case study demonstrates that patients with NCCP can be subclassified on the basis of sensory responsiveness and neurophysiologic profiles. This approach identifies specific abnormalities within the CNS processing of esophageal sensation in individual patients, allowing us to objectively differentiate those with sensitized esophageal afferents from those that are hypervigilant to esophageal sensations. The importance of this approach is to underline that NCCP comprises a heterogeneous group of patients. and only when we have defined the phenotype of this condition and identified groups of patients with specific CNS abnormalities will it be possible to perform clinical studies aimed at answering specific hypotheses. The development of a comprehensive pathophysiologic model that identifies the specific causes of symptoms in patients with esophageal hypersensitivity will allow the future management strategies of these patients to be targeted more specifically and efficiently. This will have great benefits to patients'well-being and health care use.

Vagal input to lateral area 3a in cat cortex

Penfield's sensory homunculus included visceral organs at its lateral extreme, and vagal input was recently identified lateral to the intraoral representation in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of rats. We tested whether vagal input is similarly located in cats where area 3b (equivalent to S1) is clearly distinguishable from adjacent regions. Field potentials were recorded from the intact dura over the left hemisphere using electrical stimulation of the left or right cervical vagus nerve in seven cats. A surface positive-negative potential was evoked from either side in the lateral part of the sigmoid gyrus. Finer mapping made at the pial surface with a microelectrode identified a focal site anteromedial to the anterior tip of the coronal sulcus. Depth recordings demonstrated polarity reversals and multi-unit vagal responses, indicating that the potentials were generated by an afferent activation focus in the middle layers of the cortex. The S1 mechanoreceptive representation was localized by mapping multi-unit somatosensory receptive fields in the middle cortical layers near the coronal sulcus. The vagal-evoked potential site was distinctly anterior to the intraoral S1 representation and adjacent to the masseteric-nerve-evoked potential focus. Lesions made at the focal site revealed that this site is cytoarchitectonically located in area 3a not area 3b. Thus vagal input to the sensorimotor cortex in cats resembles deep rather than cutaneous somatic input, similar to the localization of nociceptive-specific input to area 3a in monkeys. The possibilities are considered that this vagal input is involved in motor control and in the sensory experience of visceral afferent activity.

Temporo-spatial analysis of cortical activation by phasic innocuous and noxious cold stimuli--a magnetoencephalographic study

Clinical findings and recent non-invasive functional imaging studies pinpoint the insular cortex as the crucial brain area involved in cold sensation. By contrast, the role of primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices in central processing of cold is controversial. So far, temporal activation patterns of cortical areas involved in cold processing have not been examined. Using magnetoencephalography, we studied, in seven healthy subjects, the temporo-spatial dynamics of brain processes evoked by innocuous and noxious cold stimulation as compared to tactile stimuli. For this purpose, a newly designed and magnetically silent cold-stimulator was employed. In separate runs, cold and painful cold stimuli were delivered to the dorsum of the right hand. Tactile afferents were stimulated by pneumatic tactile stimulation.Following innocuous cold stimulation (DeltaT=5+/-0.3 degrees C in 50+/-2ms), magnetic source imaging revealed an exclusive activation of the contra- and ipsilateral posterior insular cortex. The mean peak latencies were 194.3+/-38.1 and 241.0+/-31.7ms for the response in the ipsi- and contralateral insular cortex, respectively. Based on the measurement of onset latencies, the estimated conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibres mediating cold fell in the range of Adelta-fibres (7.4+/-0.8 m/s). Noxious cold stimulation (DeltaT=35+/-5 degrees C in 70+/-12ms) initially activated the contra- and ipsilateral insular cortices in the same latency ranges as innocuous cold stimuli. Additionally, we found an activation of the contra- and ipsilateral SII areas (peak latencies 304+/-22.7 and 310.1+/-19.4ms, respectively) and a variable activation of the cingulate cortex. Notably, neither cold- nor painful cold stimulation produced an activation of SI. By contrast, the evoked cortical responses following tactile stimulation could be located to the contralateral SI cortex and bilateral SII. In conclusion, this study strongly corroborates the posterior insular cortex as the primary somatosensory area for cortical processing of cold sensation. Furthermore, it supports the role of SII and the cingulate cortex in mediating freeze-pain. Therefore, these results suggest different processing of cold, freeze-pain and touch in the human brain.

Cortical processing of human gut sensation: an evoked potential study

The rectum has a unique physiological role as a sensory organ and differs in its afferent innervation from other gut organs that do not normally mediate conscious sensation. We compared the central processing of human esophageal, duodenal, and rectal sensation using cortical evoked potentials (CEP) in 10 healthy volunteers (age range 21-34 yr). Esophageal and duodenal CEP had similar morphology in all subjects, whereas rectal CEP had two different but reproducible morphologies. The rectal CEP latency to the first component P1 (69 ms) was shorter than both duodenal (123 ms; P = 0.008) and esophageal CEP latencies (106 ms; P = 0.004). The duodenal CEP amplitude of the P1-N1 component (5.0 microV) was smaller than that of the corresponding esophageal component (5.7 microV; P = 0.04) but similar to that of the corresponding rectal component (6.5 microV; P = 0.25). This suggests that rectal sensation is either mediated by faster-conducting afferent pathways or that there is a difference in the orientation or volume of cortical neurons representing the different gut organs. In conclusion, the physiological and anatomic differences between gut organs are reflected in differences in the characteristics of their afferent pathways and cortical processing.

Visceral region in the rat primary somatosensory cortex identified by vagal evoked potential

Recent noninvasive human studies have reconfirmed the presence of a viscerally responsive region in the most lateral part of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). The present electrophysiological study identified the corresponding area in rats as a vagal afferent projection region and examined the cytoarchitecture. Electrical stimulation of the cervical vagus nerve elicited a field potential comparable in waveform, latency, and amplitude to the simultaneously evoked potential in the insular visceral sensory cortex. The potential field adjoined the S1 trigeminal region without overlap, and was rostroventral to the lip representation barrel field, which was identified histochemically, and rostrodorsal to the tongue representation region, which was identified electrophysiologically. The vagal potential underwent a phase reversal in the middle layers; thus, the current sink site was cytoarchitectonically identified as the most rostral part of the parietal granular cortex or the S1, where no somatosensory input has previously been demonstrated. The rat S1 contains a region representing general visceral information, topographically located as if the visceral organs protruded from the mouth.

A study of the cortical processing of ano-rectal sensation using functional MRI

Investigation of human ano-rectal physiology has concentrated largely on understanding the motor control of defecation and continence mechanisms. However, little is known of the physiology of ano-rectal sensation. There are important differences in the afferent innervation and sensory perception between the rectum and anal canal. This suggests that there could also be differences in the brain's processing of sensation from these two areas; however, this possibility remains unexplored. The aim of our study was to identify the cerebral areas processing anal (somatic) and rectal (visceral) sensation in healthy adults, using functional MRI. Eight male subjects with an age range of 21-39 years were studied on two separate occasions, one for rectal and the other for anal stimulation studies. Single shot gradient echo planar imaging was performed using a 1.5 tesla Phillips MRI scanner. For each subject, a series of 40 image sets containing 24 slices of the brain was obtained during periods of rapid phasic non-painful distension of the rectum or anal canal, alternating with rest periods, without stimulation. After motion correction, the images were analysed using cross correlation to identify the cerebral areas activated by the stimulus. Rectal stimulation resulted in bilateral activation of the inferior primary somatosensory, secondary somatosensory, sensory association, insular, peri-orbital, anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices. Anal canal stimulation resulted in activation of areas similar to rectal stimulation, but the primary somatosensory cortex was activated at a more superior level, and there was no anterior cingulate activation. In conclusion, anal and rectal sensation resulted in a similar pattern of cortical activation, including areas involved with spatial discrimination, attention and affect. The differences in sensory perception from these two regions can be explained by their different representation in the primary somatosensory cortex. The anterior cingulate cortex was only activated by rectal stimulation, suggesting that the viscera have a greater representation on the limbic cortex than somatic structures, and this explains the greater autonomic responses evoked by visceral sensation in comparison with somatic sensation.

Cortical representation of pain: functional characterization of nociceptive areas near the lateral sulcus

Many lines of evidence implicate the somatosensory areas near the lateral sulcus (Sylvian fissure) in the cortical representation of pain. Anatomical tracing studies in the monkey show nociceptive projection pathways to the vicinity of the secondary somatosensory cortex in the parietal operculum, and to anterior parts of insular cortex deep inside the Sylvian fissure. Clinical observations demonstrate alterations in pain sensation following lesions in these two areas in human parasylvian cortex. Imaging studies in humans reveal increased blood flow in parasylvian cortex, both contralaterally and ipsilaterally, in response to painful stimuli. Painful stimuli (such as laser radiant heat) evoke potentials with a scalp maximum at anterior temporal positions (T3 and T4). Several dipole source analyses as well as subdural recordings have confirmed that the earliest evoked potential following painful laser stimulation of the skin derives from sources in the parietal operculum. Thus, imaging and electrophysiological studies in humans suggest that parasylvian cortex is activated by painful stimuli, and is one of the first cortical relay stations in the central processing of these stimuli. There is mounting evidence for closely located but separate representations of pain (deep parietal operculum and anterior insula) and touch (secondary somatosensory cortex and posterior insula) in parasylvian cortex. This anatomical separation may be one of the reasons why single unit recordings of nociceptive neurons are scarce within regions comprising low-threshold mechanoreceptive neurons. The functional significance (sensory-discriminative, affective-motivational, cognitive-evaluative) of the closely spaced parasylvian cortical areas in acute and chronic pain is only poorly understood. It is likely that some of these areas are involved in sensory-limbic projection pathways that may subserve the recognition of potentially tissue damaging stimuli as well as pain memory.

Cortical processing of human somatic and visceral sensation

Somatic sensation can be localized precisely, whereas localization of visceral sensation is vague, possibly reflecting differences in the pattern of somatic and visceral input to the cerebral cortex. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to study the cortical processing of sensation arising from the proximal (somatic) and distal (visceral) esophagus in six healthy male subjects. Esophageal stimulation was performed by phasic distension of a 2 cm balloon at 0.5 Hz. For each esophageal region, five separate 30 sec periods of nonpainful distension were alternated with five periods of similar duration without distension. Gradient echoplanar images depicting bold contrast were acquired using a 1.5 T GE scanner. Distension of the proximal esophagus was localized precisely to the upper chest and was represented in the trunk region of the left primary somatosensory cortex. In contrast, distension of the distal esophagus was perceived diffusely over the lower chest and was represented bilaterally at the junction of the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices. Different activation patterns were also observed in the anterior cingulate gyrus with the proximal esophagus being represented in the right midanterior cingulate cortex (BA 24) and the distal esophagus in the perigenual area (BA32). Differences in the activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cerebellum were also observed for the two esophageal regions. These findings suggest that cortical specialization in the sensory-discriminative, affective, and cognitive areas of the cortex accounts for the perceptual differences observed between the two sensory modalities.