Avapritinib in advanced PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumour (NAVIGATOR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial

Navigating Ongoing Challenges in GI Stromal Tumors

GI stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal neoplasms with variable natural histories, originating in the GI tract, most commonly in the stomach. They are frequently characterized by KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) oncogenic mutations. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for localized GISTs. Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of adjuvant imatinib in patients selected on the basis of recurrence risk and gene mutations, although the optimal duration of therapy is yet to be established. Some data suggest that longer durations of adjuvant imatinib (>3 years) may provide additional benefit, which is being investigated in ongoing trials. Management of imatinib-related adverse effects is essential during treatment, and longitudinal abdominal imaging is mandatory both during and after adjuvant therapy. Once GISTs are more advanced and unresectable, KIT- and PDGFRA-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) become the key treatment in most patients with KIT mutation. Several TKIs have regulatory approval for advanced GISTs, but in most patients, resistance to TKIs eventually emerges, mainly from secondary resistance mutations in KIT. Each TKI has different coverage of oncogenic KIT mutations, suggested by preclinical and clinical findings, which has given rationale to an ongoing clinical trial that includes molecular selection as eligibility criteria. Furthermore, novel treatment approaches, from TKI combinations to an antibody-drug conjugate, are being investigated. Despite the significant advance in managing GISTs with KIT mutations, those without KIT or PDGFRA mutation, which consists of 10%-15% of patients with GIST, can be a clinical challenge in the advanced setting. These non-KIT/PDGFRA GISTs could be driven by genomic or epigenomic alterations in SDHx, NF1 mutations, and other genomic alterations. Non-KIT/PDGFRA GISTs are less responsive to currently available TKIs than GISTs driven by KIT/PDGFRA mutations, and each subset of non-KIT/PDGFRA GIST has distinctive biology and clinical features. Therefore, individualized, multidisciplinary, biology-based management and consideration for clinical trial enrollment are critical for non-KIT/PDGRFA GISTs.

Research on individualized drug sensitivity detection technology based on bio-3D printing technology for precision treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

This study aims to analyze and explore whether tumor biological three-dimensional printing (3DP) models can serve as reliable preclinical model research tools and assist in the personalized treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Ten GIST cases admitted to our hospital from May 2024 to September 2024 were included in the personalized treatment group. Patient-derived GIST 3DP models were established, and treatment plans were selected based on the results of drug sensitivity tests. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the personalized treatment group was compared with that of GIST patients who had progressed after first-line treatment and were admitted to our hospital before the study. Treatment safety was also assessed. Immunofluorescence staining technology was used to observe tumor markers in the 3DP tumor models and their corresponding parent tumor tissues, revealing a high degree of consistency, which indicates that the 3DP tumor models highly retain the histological characteristics of the parent tumor tissues. The median PFS of patients in the personalized treatment group was 6.1 months, compared to 5.3 months in the previous treatment group, with a statistically significant difference (P-value <0.05). The individualized drug sensitivity detection technology based on bio-3D printing technology, used for the personalized treatment of GIST patients who have progressed after first-line treatment, can benefit patients.

Effect of Nutrition Risk Screening 2002-guided enteral nutrition on nutritional status in gastrointestinal tumor patients

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition exacerbates the deterioration in patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors.

AIM

To analyze the effect of enteral nutritional support based on Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) risk assessment on nutritional function in patients with gastrointestinal tumors.

METHODS

One hundred twelve patients from April 2022 to April 2024 were included for observation and were divided into a control group and an observation group by random number method, 56 each. Both groups received treatment for four consecutive weeks. The control group received routine enteral nutrition support, while the observation group received enteral nutrition support based on the NRS2002 risk assessment. Nutritional function, intestinal mucosal barrier function, quality of life, and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS26.0 and Excel.

RESULTS

After nutritional intervention, transferrin, albumin, hemoglobin, and diamine oxidase levels in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, while C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor α, and quality of life scores were lower, with significant differences (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in complications between groups (P > 0.05), but the complication rate was lower in the observation group.

CONCLUSION

Enteral nutritional support based on NRS2002 risk assessment for patients with gastrointestinal tumors positively impacts nutritional status and promotes intestinal mucosal barrier function recovery. Patients’ quality of life improved, and the incidence of adverse reactions decreased, indicating clinical promotion and application value.

When Is It Important to Sequence Sarcomas and Other Mesenchymal Neoplasms? A Practical Guide to Molecular Testing

The increasingly widespread availability of next-generation sequencing has led to its incorporation as a diagnostic tool in pathology and a modality for identifying targetable alterations. However, sequencing is still a somewhat expensive and time-consuming. Here, we discuss tumor types for which (1) molecular testing is not generally indicated, (2) surrogate immunohistochemical markers have rendered molecular testing unnecessary, or (3) sequencing is important for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. We also provide a practical framework to assist in decision-making for molecular testing of both classified and unclassified mesenchymal neoplasms, reflecting our practice in a tertiary sarcoma referral center.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Current Approaches and Future Directions in the Treatment of Advanced Disease

This review discusses the current and future landscape of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treatment. It covers the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), specifically imatinib, and further treatment options, such as sunitinib, regorafenib, and ripretinib, as well as avapritinib for platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha D842V mutations. In addition, this review emphasizes individualized treatment strategies within multidisciplinary expert teams, including surgery and other locoregional therapies, together with the importance of mutation-guided approaches, particularly for wild-type GISTs. Finally, it explores the potential of next-generation KIT inhibitors, combination therapies, and other investigational approaches.

Pimitespib therapy for a patient with PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) mutations are resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Pimitespib, a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, was recently approved as a fourth-line treatment for advanced GISTs; however, data on its efficacy against PDGFRA-mutant GISTs remain scarce. We report a case of a 67-year-old male with a gastric GIST harboring a PDGFRA exon 18 Asp842Val mutation. The patient presented with a large peritoneal metastasis at the hepatic hilum and underwent proton beam therapy, achieving 8 months of disease control. However, the tumor progressed thereafter. Regorafenib was introduced but failed immediately owing to tumor penetration. The treatment was switched to pimitespib (160 mg daily, 5 days on, 2 days off, per 21-day cycle), and the patient completed four cycles of the therapy. Post-treatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography showed a significant reduction in FDG uptake by the metastatic lesion. Pimitespib therapy was eventually discontinued because of duodenal bleeding, with a time to treatment failure of 13 weeks. Although based on a single case, this report demonstrates a significant metabolic response to pimitespib in PDGFRA-mutant GIST. More cases are required to fully elucidate the efficacy of this therapy against such rare tumors.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of avapritinib in real-world Spanish cases with gastrointestinal stromal tumor and D842V-PDGFRA mutation

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common sarcoma subtype. Patients with unresectable or metastatic GISTs harboring the D842V mutation in the PDGFRA gene have a poor prognosis due to intrinsic resistance to imatinib and all other approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Avapritinib, targeting this mutation, is the first agent approved for patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST that have the PDGFRA D842V mutation. This study assesses the effectiveness and safety of avapritinib in real-world clinical scenarios involving Spanish patients with this mutation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AVARWE study is a descriptive, retrospective, multicenter observational study of 21 patients treated with avapritinib across 13 Spanish centers from June 9, 2023, to December 18, 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment history, and response rates based on RECIST criteria. The main outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were measured, with safety assessed through adverse events documentation according to CTCAE criteria.

RESULTS

Median PFS 35.6 was months and median OS was 42.2 months, with survival rates at 1, 5, and 3 years demonstrating avapritinib effectiveness. The objective response rate was 76.2% for partial response and 4.8% for complete response. Avapritinib enabled surgical intervention in previously unresectable cases and was generally well-tolerated, with manageable adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Avapritinib extends PFS and OS among patients with PDGFRA D842V-mutant GIST in real-world practice, mirroring pivotal trial outcomes. Its substantial activity supports its use as a first-line therapy for this subgroup. The manageable safety profile reinforces avapritinib viability for routine use. Given the rarity of these cases, it is advised to consult sarcoma-expert units.

Targeted inhibition of PDGFRA with avapritinib, markedly enhances lenvatinib efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo: clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor, has emerged as a frontline therapeutic strategy for the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the modest response rate observed with lenvatinib and the rapid emergence of chemoresistance highlight the urgent need to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. Herein we aimed at identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying lenvatinib resistance in HCC and investigated the efficacy of targeted combination therapies to surmount this chemoresistance.

METHODS

We utilized CRISPR/Cas9 gene knockout screening combined with transcriptome sequencing of lenvatinib-resistant HCC cell lines to identify resistance-associated genes. PDGFRA overexpression was validated in human lenvatinib-resistant HCC cells. We further corroborated the in vitro and in vivo role of PDGFRA in lenvatinib resistance using a PDGFRA inhibitor, avapritinib, employing a mouse orthotopic HCC model, patient-derived organoids (PDO), and patient-derived xenografts (PDX). The association between PDGFRA expression and patient prognosis was also assessed. Mechanistic studies were conducted to elucidate the signaling pathways contributing to lenvatinib resistance mediated by PDGFRA.

RESULTS

PDGFRA overexpression was identified as a key determinant of lenvatinib-resistance in HCC cells. Consistently, ectopic PGDGFRA overexpression conferred lenvatinib resistance upon HCC cells. Treatment with the PDGFRA inhibitor avapritinib sensitized HCC cells to lenvatinib in mouse orthotopic HCC, PDO, and PDX models. Increased PDGFRA expression was correlated with poor prognosis in HCC patients. Mechanistic studies revealed that lenvatinib treatment or PDGFRA overexpression promoted HCC resistance through the PTEN/AKT/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that PDGFRA overexpression mediates lenvatinib resistance in HCC and that targeting PDGFRA with avapritinib, surmounts this resistance. Furthermore, the PTEN/AKT/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway was implicated in lenvatinib resistance, providing a potential therapeutic strategy for HCC patients displaying lenvatinib resistance. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings and to explore the clinical application of PDGFRA-targeted therapies in HCC treatment.

Pimitespib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Japan: an expanded access program

BACKGROUND

Pimitespib, an oral heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in CHAPTER-GIST-301 study. This expanded access program was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pimitespib in Japanese patients with advanced GIST.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study was conducted in patients (≥ 20 years) with histologically confirmed GIST who had been previously treated with imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients received pimitespib 160 mg/day for five days, followed by a 2-day rest, in 21-day cycles.

RESULTS

Between February and August 2022, 23 patients were enrolled (median age 59.0 years). Over a median pimitespib treatment duration of 81.0 days, adverse events occurred in 22 patients (95.7%). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (73.9%), nausea (39.1%) and increased blood creatinine (30.4%). Serious adverse events occurred in two patients (tumor hemorrhage and tumor pain); neither was related to pimitespib. One patient had grade 3 diarrhea that was considered treatment-related. Four patients (17.4%) had eye disorders, all of which were grade 1 and treatment-related. The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.2), the overall response rate was 0% (95% CI 0-16.1) and the disease control rate was 66.7% (95% CI 43.0-85.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Pimitespib was well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced GIST in real-world practice in Japan. No new safety signals were identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCT2031210526 registered 1 February 2022.

Selective internal radiation with Y-90 resin microspheres (SIRT) for liver metastases of gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GIST) resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic metastases of GIST might be the dominant site of progression and resistant to available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) offers treatment by intratumoral radiation up to 200 Gy. We analyzed the hepatic progression-free survival (H-PFS) in a consecutive patient cohort.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients (median age 57.6 years) with biopsy proven liver metastases of GIST were treated by SIRT. All had RECIST documented tumor progression, and 24/26 patients had up to four lines of pretreatment. Mutational status was 'quadruple wildtype' (q-wt, n = 5), KIT exon 11/9/13 in n = 15/4/1 cases and PDGFRα (n = 1). Median follow-up of this retrospective analysis of a prospectively kept database is 33.6 months.

RESULTS

Median H-PFS was 16 months (range, 4-54+ months, 95% CI 6.5-25.4 months) and OS after SIRT was 28 months (95% CI 17.2-28.7 months). Best H-PFS was observed in patients with 'q-wt' at 25 months (range, 6+-54 months, 95% CI 16.2-33.8 months). The worst outcome was for KIT exon 11 mutations plus secondary mutations with 7 months (range, 4-33 months, 95% CI, 4.2-9.8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

90Y-SIRT is a potent treatment for patients with liver metastases of GIST resistant to TKI therapy. In patients with 'q-wt' GIST, SIRT is an option for first-line use.

Nanomotor-driven precision therapy for peritoneal metastasis

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a terminal stage of gastrointestinal cancers, often resulting in poor survival outcomes. Traditional treatments like cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have shown some effectiveness but are associated with significant risks. This study presents a novel nanomotor-based drug delivery system (M@MnO2-Au-mSiO2@CDDP) designed to enhance the efficacy of PM treatment. By utilizing an oxygen-driven heterojunction nanomotor (MnO2-Au-mSiO2), coated with membrane of M1-type macrophages, the system targets PM tumors with high precision through intraperitoneal perfusion. These biomimetic NMs promote deep tumor penetration, enhance reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and activate the STING pathway, a critical component in immune regulation. The catalytic properties of MnO2 within the nanomotors enhance drug permeability and retention, enabling targeted and controlled drug release. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated the system's ability to significantly inhibit tumor growth, induce apoptosis, and activate immune responses. In addition, the synergistic effect of targeted drug delivery, catalytic therapy and immunotherapy of this system was further confirmed by constructing an in vitro gastric cancer organoid model, showing great clinical application potential. The study also confirmed excellent biocompatibility and stability, making these NMs a promising clinical tool for the treatment of PM. This research underscores the potential of nanotechnology to revolutionize cancer treatment by overcoming the limitations of traditional therapies and paving the way for future innovations in targeted cancer therapies.

How I diagnose and treat myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with tyrosine kinase gene fusions

ABSTRACT

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) both include a category "myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms (MLN) with eosinophilia (eo) and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions" (WHO, MLN-TK; ICC, M/LN-eo-TK). This rare group comprises phenotypically and prognostically heterogeneous disorders, which present a significant diagnostic challenge. The rapid and reliable identification of patients with MLN-TK may be delayed due to genetic complexity and significant phenotypic differences, including the chronic phase and primary/secondary blast phase (BP) of myeloid, lymphoid, or mixed phenotype in the bone marrow (BP-BM) and/or at extramedullary sites (extramedullary disease [EMD]). As a result, the entire armamentarium of conventional molecular genetic and cytogenetic techniques complemented by modern sequencing technologies, such as RNA sequencing or whole-genome sequencing, are often required to identify an underlying TK fusion. TK inhibitors (TKIs) with variable efficacy are available for all fusion genes, but a long-term favorable clinical course under TKI monotherapy is currently only observed in MLN-PDGFRA/PDGFRB fusion genes on imatinib. Because primary/secondary BP-BM/EMD occurs more frequently in MLN-FGFR1/JAK2/FLT3/ETV6::ABL1, a sequential combination of selective TKIs with or without prior intensive chemotherapy, rarely local radiotherapy, and/or subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation should be considered.

Effective targeting of PDGFRA-altered high-grade glioma with avapritinib

PDGFRA is crucial to tumorigenesis and frequently genomically altered in high-grade glioma (HGG). In a comprehensive dataset of pediatric HGG (n = 261), we detect PDGFRA mutations and/or amplifications in 15% of cases, suggesting PDGFRA as a therapeutic target. We reveal that the PDGFRA/KIT inhibitor avapritinib shows (1) selectivity for PDGFRA inhibition, (2) distinct patterns of subcellular effects, (3) in vitro and in vivo activity in patient-derived HGG models, and (4) effective blood-brain barrier penetration in mice and humans. Furthermore, we report preliminary clinical real-world experience using avapritinib in pediatric and young adult patients with predominantly recurrent/refractory PDGFRA-altered HGG (n = 8). Our early data demonstrate that avapritinib is well tolerated and results in radiographic response in 3/7 cases, suggesting a potential role for avapritinib in the treatment of HGG with specific PDGFRA alterations. Overall, these translational results underscore the therapeutic potential of PDGFRA inhibition with avapritinib in HGG.

Management of subepithelial esophageal tumors

Subepithelial esophageal tumors (SET) are normally benign intramural esophageal lesions of mesenchymal origin. Although rare, the incidence of SET has increased in recent decades due to the more widespread use of endoscopy and diagnostic imaging. The current review aims to provide an overview of the histopathologic spectrum and the most frequent entities including leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), diagnostic workup, and multidisciplinary treatment options. Staging for SET should include endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and tissue sampling. Current consensus guidelines recommend that SET suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) larger than 20 mm or lesions with high-risk stigmata should undergo tissue sampling. Most SET have an excellent long-term outcome, but malignancy may be present in certain subtypes. Asymptomatic SET without high-risk stigmata discovered incidentally usually do not require specific treatment. However, depending on the size and location of the lesion symptoms may occur. Therapeutic interventions range from endoscopic interventional resections to major surgical procedures. Enucleation via minimally invasive or robotic-assisted access remains the standard of care for most SET sub-entities.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to outline the current understanding of the molecular drivers and treatment paradigms of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, with a focus on recent developments in treatment in the advanced disease setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been recent advancements in our understanding of the molecular biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, including the identification of new genetic drivers and complex resistance mechanisms. We review the most recent findings in these areas, focusing on how new research insights are reshaping treatment strategies. Recent advancements in our understanding of the biology and treatment of GIST are paving the way for more personalized and effective therapeutic options. As knowledge of rare molecular subtypes, resistance mechanisms, and novel genomic techniques grows, new approaches are emerging in an effort to improve patient outcomes.

Recent advances in the synthesis of anticancer pyrazole derivatives using microwave, ultrasound, and mechanochemical techniques

Pyrazole and its derivatives have attracted considerable attention in pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry, as reflected in their presence in numerous FDA-approved drugs and clinical candidates. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of articles published between 2014 and 2024, focusing on the microwave-, ultrasound-, and mechanochemical-assisted synthesis of pyrazole derivatives with anticancer activity. It explores synthetic methodologies, anticancer efficacy, and molecular docking studies, underscoring the significance of pyrazole derivatives in drug discovery and medicinal chemistry. Notably, microwave irradiation stands out as the most widely employed technique, providing high efficiency by significantly reducing reaction times while maintaining moderate temperatures. Ultrasound irradiation serves as a valuable alternative, particularly for processes that require milder conditions, whereas mechanochemical activation, though less frequently employed, offers distinct advantages in terms of sustainability.

Emerging treatments for sarcoma: from 2024 onward

INTRODUCTION

Sarcomas are a rare and diverse group of mesenchymal-origin solid tumors, constituting only 1% of adult malignancies and classified into soft tissue and bone sarcomas. For localized diseases, surgery and radiotherapy remain the cornerstone treatments. However, systemic options for advanced stages are limited, with an overall survival of approximately 20 months. There is an urgent need to refine clinical trial designs and evaluate novel therapies to improve patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes recent advancements in sarcoma clinical trials, highlighting promising therapies that may reshape treatment paradigms. It also examines insights from comprehensive genomic profiling studies, which are paving the way for next-generation therapeutic approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

The heterogeneity and rarity of sarcomas present substantial challenges to the development and regulatory approval of effective therapies. Recent progress in the field has introduced innovative approaches, including novel chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies, and immunotherapeutics. However, despite these advancements, significant hurdles persist. While these strategies have demonstrated some success, the overall improvements in survival have often been modest, irrespective of the therapeutic modality. This underscores critical concerns regarding the true cost-benefit balance and the potential for adverse effects, particularly when evaluated over extended follow-up periods.

Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are sarcomas that arise from the muscular layer of the gastrointestinal tract. The stomach is the most common location, followed by the small intestine. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment; extensive margins and lymphadenectomy are not routinely required. Commonly utilized resection techniques include wedge gastrectomy, excision and closure of the gastrotomy, and anterior gastrotomy access with internal wedge resection. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors can be utilized in the neoadjuvant setting for cases where a reduction in tumor size would optimize resection, and in the adjuvant setting for high-risk tumors. In select cases, metastasectomy may improve prognosis.

Analysis of postmarketing neuropsychiatric adverse events of avapritinib based on the FDA adverse event reporting system

Neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs) significantly impact the quality of life of patients using avapritinib. However, the majority of current data comes from pre-marketing, with limited real-world studies. Our research aimed to explore post-marketing data of avapritinib. We evaluated the signals of avapritinib-related neuropsychiatric AEs by data mining using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) were employed to quantify the signals from the first quarter of 2020 through the fourth quarter of 2023. Subsequently, stratified analyses were conducted to further explore the effect of different stratification schemes on the association between avapritinib and neuropsychiatric AEs. Finally, a combination medication analysis was conducted to explore the impact of the co-administration of neuropsychiatric AEs. A total of 2029 neuropsychiatric AEs were reported, and 49 signals were detected, of which 5 were determined to be new signals. Avapritinib was significantly associated with the occurrence of neuropsychiatric AEs (ROR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.44-1.61; IC: 0.43, IC025: 0.35). The stratified analysis found that gender, age and eight preferred terms (PTs), including cerebral haemorrhage, may affect the severity of AEs. Combination medication analysis showed that combining avapritinib with 19 other medications, including prochlorperazine, may increase the risk of neuropsychiatric AEs. The median time-to-onset (TTO) of avapritinib-related neuropsychiatric AEs was 32 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-200) days, with about 65% of cases occurring within the first three months of treatment. An increase in the signal for neuropsychiatric AEs was identified in post-marketing studies of avapritinib. Clinicians are advised to remain vigilant for such events, particularly during the initial stages of treatment with avapritinib.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in PDGFRA-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Importance

The D842V platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) mutation identifies a molecular subgroup of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), primarily resistant to standard tyrosine kinase inhibitors and with an overall more indolent behavior. Although functional imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-labeled positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) plays a proven role in GISTs, especially in early assessment of tumor response, less is known about [18F]FDG uptake according to the GIST molecular subtypes.

Objective

To evaluate the degree of [18F]FDG uptake in PDGFRA-mutant GISTs and better define the role of functional imaging in this rare and peculiar subset of GISTs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study involving 7 GIST reference centers in Italy included patients with PDGFRA-mutant GIST who underwent [18F]FDG-PET from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2023. Data on the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumor or metastatic disease were collected.

Exposure

PDGFRA-mutant GIST and [18F]FDG-PET.

Main Outcome and Measure

The primary outcome was the degree of [18F]FDG uptake of PDGFRA-mutant GISTs, with a focus on the D842V-mutant subgroup. Secondary objectives were to assess the association between the degree of [18F]FDG uptake and main clinicopathologic features.

Results

A total of 71 patients with PDGFRA-mutant GISTs were included in the analysis: 37 (52.1%) in the D842V subgroup (group A) and 34 (47.9%) in the non-D842V subgroup (group B). Additionally, 70 patients with KIT exon 11-mutant GIST served as a control group (group C). For all 141 participants, the median age at diagnosis was 59 (range, 26-89) years, and 81 patients (57.4%) were male. Overall, the median SUVmax was 4.4 (IQR, 0-10.1), while the median SUVmax for group A was 0 (IQR, 0-3.2); for group B, 3.6 (IQR, 0-5.1); and for group C, 10.1 (IQR, 5.1-13.9). The median SUVmax of PDGFRA-mutant GISTs was significantly lower than the median value of KIT exon 11-mutant GISTs (0 [IQR, 0-4.3] vs 10.1 [IQR, 5.1-14.0]; P < .001). Median [18F]FDG uptake was significantly lower in the D842V subgroup compared with the non-D842V subgroup (0 [IQR, 0-3.2] vs 3.6 [IQR, 0-5.1]; P = .02). Moreover, the triad of gastric primary tumor, tumor size greater than 10 cm, and SUVmax of 5.75 or less was associated with identification of PDGFRA-mutant GISTs.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with PDGFRA-mutant GISTs, the D842V-mutant GISTs were associated with an overall lower [18F]FDG uptake compared with other GIST subgroups. Therefore, the role of functional imaging with [18F]FDG-PET in this subset of GISTs may be limited and should be further explored for its potential prognostic and predictive value.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): British Sarcoma Group clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

British Sarcoma Group guidelines for the management of GIST were initially informed by those published by the European Society of Clinical Oncology. This update was written by a group of experts to includes a discussion of the highlight improvements in our knowledge of the disease and recent treatment developments. The guidelines include sections on Incidence, Aetiology, Diagnosis, including risk assessment, Treatment and Follow-up.

METHODS

A careful review of the literature was performed to ensure that wherever possible recommendations are supported by the results of clinical trials or substantive retrospective reports. Areas of uncertainty are indicated appropriately.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines represent a consensus view of current best clinical practice. Where appropriate, key recommendations are given and the levels of evidence and strength of recommendation gradings are those used by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).

Novel Therapeutics in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

There has been noteworthy progress in molecular characterisation and therapeutics in soft tissue sarcomas. Novel agents have gained regulatory approval by the FDA. Examples are the tyrosine kinase inhibitors avapritinib and ripretinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), the immune check point inhibitor atezolizumab in alveolar soft part tissue sarcoma, the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat in desmoid tumours, the NTRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib in tumours with NTRK fusions, the mTOR inhibitor nab-sirolimus in PEComa, and the EZH-2 inhibitor tazemetostat in epithelioid sarcoma. The FDA has also recently granted accelerated approval for autologous T-cell therapy with afami-cel in patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing synovial sarcoma. There are other promising treatments that are still investigational, such as MDM2 and CDK4/6 inhibitors in well-/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors in the head and neck angiosarcoma and a subset of patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and PARP inhibitors in leiomyosarcoma. The challenges in drug development in soft tissue sarcoma are due to the rarity and the molecular heterogeneity of the disease and the fact that many subtypes are associated with complex karyotypes or non-targetable molecular alterations. We believe that progress maybe possible with a better understanding of the complex biology, the development of novel compounds for difficult targets such as proteolysis targeting chimeras (Protacs), the utilisation of modern clinical trial designs, and enhanced collaboration of academia with industry to develop treatments with a strong biologic rationale.

Gene Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Advances in Treatment and Mechanism Research

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been reported in patients of all ages, its diagnosis is more common in elders. The two most common types of mutation, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor a (PDGFRA) mutations, hold about 75 and 15% of GISTs cases, respectively. Tumors without KIT or PDGFRA mutations are known as wild type (WT)-GISTs, which takes up for 15% of all cases. WT-GISTs have other genetic alterations, including mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase and serine-threonine protein kinase BRAF and neurofibromatosis type 1. Other GISTs without any of the above genetic mutations are named "quadruple WT" GISTs. More types of rare mutations are being reported. These mutations or gene fusions were initially thought to be mutually exclusive in primary GISTs, but recently it has been reported that some of these rare mutations coexist with KIT or PDGFRA mutations. The treatment and management differ according to molecular subtypes of GISTs. Especially for patients with late-stage tumors, developing a personalized chemotherapy regimen based on mutation status is of great help to improve patient survival and quality of life. At present, imatinib mesylate is an effective first-line drug for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic recurrent GISTs, but how to overcome drug resistance is still an important clinical problem. The effectiveness of other drugs is being further evaluated. The progress in the study of relevant mechanisms also provides the possibility to develop new targets or new drugs.

Overall survival of patients with KIT-mutant metastatic GIST in the era of multiple kinase inhibitor availability

PURPOSE

The prognosis of patients with metastatic GIST and imatinib-sensitive primary mutations has significantly improved. However, limited data are available to inform patients about outcomes across different lines of treatment. This retrospective analysis aims to evaluate patient outcomes at a large German GIST referral center over the past 15 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed in patients with metastatic GIST, with diagnosis of metastases between 2008 and 2021, when at least three lines of treatment were available in Germany (n = 174).

RESULTS

The median overall survival far exceeds historical data for patients with primary exon 11 and exon 9 mutations (median OS in palliative treatment with imatinib: 7.1 years; median OS in second-line palliative treatment with sunitinib: 2.9 years; median OS in third-line palliative treatment with regorafenib: 1.9 years). Among those patients who received palliative imatinib treatment, no significant difference in median OS survival was observed between those who had received perioperative imatinib for localized disease and those who did not. Furthermore, the location of metastases significantly impacted survival, whereas the time between the initial diagnosis and the diagnosis of metastases had no significant effect on survival.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study provides a novel, real-world reference for survival outcomes in patients with metastatic GIST.

Approach to the patient with eosinophilia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and biologicals

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we aim to explore the optimal approach to patients presenting with eosinophilia, considering recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Specifically, we focus on the integration of novel therapies into clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advanced insights into the clinical and genetic features of eosinophilic disorders have prompted revisions in diagnostic criteria by the World Health Organization classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). These changes reflect a growing understanding of disease pathogenesis and the development of targeted treatment options. The therapeutic landscape now encompasses a range of established and novel therapies. For reactive conditions, drugs targeting the eosinophilopoiesis, such as those aimed at interleukin-5 or its receptor, have demonstrated significant potential in decreasing blood eosinophil levels and minimizing disease flare-ups and relapse. These therapies have the potential to mitigate the side effects commonly associated with prolonged use of oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions are managed by various TK inhibitors with variable efficacy. Diagnosis and treatment rely on a multidisciplinary approach. By incorporating novel treatment options into clinical practice, physicians across different disciplines involved in the management of eosinophilic disorders can offer more personalized and effective care to patients. However, challenges remain in accurately diagnosing and risk-stratifying patients, as well as in navigating the complexities of treatment selection.

Targeting Solvent-Front Mutations for Kinase Drug Discovery: From Structural Basis to Design Strategies

Solvent-front mutations have emerged as a common mechanism leading to acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors, representing a major challenge in the clinic. Several new-generation kinase inhibitors targeting solvent-front mutations have either been approved or advanced to clinical trials. However, there remains a need to discover effective, new-generation inhibitors. In this Perspective, we systematically summarize the general types of solvent-front mutations across the kinome and describe the development of inhibitors targeting some key solvent-front mutations. Additionally, we highlight the challenges and opportunities for the next generation of kinase inhibitors directed toward overcoming solvent-front mutations.

Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 (FGF2) Activates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Signaling in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): An Autocrine Mechanism Contributing to Imatinib Mesylate (IM) Resistance

We showed previously that the autocrine activation of the FGFR-mediated pathway in GIST lacking secondary KIT mutations was a result of the inhibition of KIT signaling. We show here that the FGF2/FGFR pathway regulates VEGF-A/VEGFR signaling in IM-resistant GIST cells. Indeed, recombinant FGF2 increased the production of VEGF-A by IM-naive and resistant GIST cells. VEGF-A production was also increased in KIT-inhibited GIST, whereas the neutralization of FGF2 by anti-FGF2 mAb attenuated VEGFR signaling. Of note, BGJ 398, pan FGFR inhibitor, effectively and time-dependently inhibited VEGFR signaling in IM-resistant GIST T-1R cells, thereby revealing the regulatory role of the FGFR pathway in VEGFR signaling for this particular GIST cell line. This also resulted in significant synergy between BGJ 398 and VEGFR inhibitors (i.e., sunitinib and regorafenib) by enhancing their pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative activities. The high potency of the combined use of VEGFR and FGFR inhibitors in IM-resistant GISTs was revealed by the impressive synergy scores observed for regorafenib or sunitinib and BGJ 398. Moreover, FGFR1/2 and VEGFR1/2 were co-localized in IM-resistant GIST T-1R cells, and the direct interaction between the aforementioned RTKs was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation. In contrast, IM-resistant GIST 430 cells expressed lower basal levels of FGF2 and VEGF-A. Despite the increased expression VEGFR1 and FGFR1/2 in GIST 430 cells, these RTKs were not co-localized and co-immunoprecipitated. Moreover, no synergy between FGFR and VEGFR inhibitors was observed for the IM-resistant GIST 430 cell line. Collectively, the dual targeting of FGFR and VEGFR pathways in IM-resistant GISTs is not limited to the synergistic anti-angiogenic treatment effects. The dual inhibition of FGFR and VEGFR pathways in IM-resistant GISTs potentiates the proapoptotic and anti-proliferative activities of the corresponding RTKi. Mechanistically, the FGF2-induced activation of the FGFR pathway turns on VEGFR signaling via the overproduction of VEGF-A, induces the interaction between FGFR1/2 and VEGFR1, and thereby renders cancer cells highly sensitive to the dual inhibition of the aforementioned RTKs. Thus, our data uncovers the novel mechanism of the cross-talk between the aforementioned RTKs in IM-resistant GISTs lacking secondary KIT mutations and suggests that the dual blockade of FGFR and VEGFR signaling might be an effective treatment strategy for patients with GIST-acquired IM resistance via KIT-independent mechanisms.

Molecular Profiling of KIT/PDGFRA-Mutant and Wild-Type Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) with Clinicopathological Correlation: An 18-Year Experience at a Tertiary Center in Kuwait

In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), identifying prototypical mutations in the KIT/PDGFRA oncogenes, or in rare alternate genes, is essential for prognostication and predicting response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conversely, wild-type GISTs (WT-GIST), which lack known mutations, have limited treatment options. Data on the mutational landscape of GISTs and their impact on disease progression are very limited in Kuwait. Using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel, we investigated the spectrum and frequency of KIT, PDGFRA, and RAS-pathway-related mutations in 95 out of 200 GISTs diagnosed at Kuwait Cancer Center from 2005 to 2023 and assessed their correlation with clinicopathological parameters. Among the 200 tumors (median age 55 years; 15-91), 54% originated in the stomach, 33% in the small bowel, 7% in the colorectum, 1.5% in the peritoneum, and 4.5% had an unknown primary site. Of the 95 molecularly profiled cases, 88% had a mutation: KIT (61%), PDGFRA (25%), NF1 (2%), and one NTRK1 rearrangement. Ten WT-GISTs were identified (stomach = 6, small bowel = 2, and colorectum = 2). WT-GISTs tended to be smaller (median 4.0 cm; 0.5-8.0) (p = 0.018), with mitosis ≤5/5 mm2, and were of lower risk (p = 0.019). KIT mutations were an adverse indicator of disease progression (p = 0.049), while wild-type status did not significantly impact progression (p = 0.934). The genetic landscape in this cohort mirrors that of global studies, but regional collaborations are needed to correlate outcomes with genetic variants.

A PDE3A-SLFN12 Molecular Glue Exhibits Significant Antitumor Activity in TKI-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), the most common mesenchymal tumor with KIT or PDGFRA driver mutations, is typically treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, resistance to TKIs due to secondary mutations is a common challenge in advanced GISTs. In addition, there are currently no effective therapies for several other molecular subtypes, such as succinate dehydrogenase-deficient GISTs. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are needed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

To address this need, we tested the efficacy of a novel non-TKI compound, OPB-171775, using patient-derived xenograft models of GISTs. In parallel, we sought to elucidate the mechanism of action of the compound.

RESULTS

Our study revealed that OPB-171775 exhibited significant efficacy against GISTs regardless of their KIT mutation status by inducing complex formation between phosphodiesterase 3A (PDE3A) and Schlafen family member 12 (SLFN12), which are highly expressed in GISTs, leading to SLFN12 RNase-mediated cell death. Furthermore, we identified the activation of general control non-derepressible 2 and its downstream response as an effector pathway of SLFN12 in mediating anticancer activity and revealed potential pharmacodynamic markers.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that OPB-171775, with its significant efficacy, could potentially serve as a novel and effective treatment option for advanced GISTs, particularly those resistant to TKIs.

First Description of the Clinical Activity of Avapritinib in Sporadic Mesenteric Desmoid Tumor

Desmoid tumors (DTs) are rare and locally aggressive with a high rate of local recurrence even with optimal surgical resection. Systemic treatments are often utilized for desmoid cases with high risk of surgical morbidity or for local and symptomatic control of recurrent disease. However, the systemic treatment options for DTs are limited with limited responses. Avapritinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in 2020 for adults with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GISTs) harboring a platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) Exon 18 mutation, including D842V mutations. In this case report, we describe a 55-year-old man with a history of D842V-mutant gastric GIST who presented several years after complete resection of the GIST with an enlarging soft tissue mass in the small intestine. After a nondiagnostic biopsy, the patient was started on avapritinib due to concerns for recurrent D842V-mutant GIST. The tumor had a partial response to treatment by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the patient underwent surgical resection. The final pathology report revealed a sporadic DT. To our knowledge, this is the first known description of the activity of avapritinib in the treatment of a sporadic mesenteric DT, which is relevant given the limited treatment options for patients with this diagnosis. This clinical finding may be worth exploring in a dedicated clinical trial.

Different efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors by KIT and PGFRA mutations identified in circulating tumor DNA for the treatment of refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

While advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are primarily treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), acquired resistance from specific mutations in KIT or PDGFRA frequently occurs. We aimed to assess the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a modality of therapeutic decision-making in advanced GIST.

METHODS

We conducted a pooled analysis of SCRUM-Japan studies for advanced GIST patients. We compared patient characteristics analyzed with tissue and blood samples, assessed gene alteration profiles, and evaluated prognostic implications from ctDNA status.

RESULTS

In 133 patients, tissue and blood samples were analyzed for 89 and 44 patients, respectively. ctDNA was detected in 72.7% of cases; no prior treatment or progressive disease was significantly associated with ctDNA-positivity. ctDNA-positive patients had significantly shorter progression-free survival compared with ctDNA-negative patients (hazard ratio = 3.92; P = 0.007). ctDNA genotyping revealed a complex landscape of gene alterations, characterized by multi-exonic mutations in KIT, compared with tissue-based analysis. Patients who received TKIs matched to the identified KIT mutation in ctDNA demonstrated significantly longer PFS than those with unmatched treatment (median, 8.23 vs. 2.43 months; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA-based analysis facilitates assessment of disease status and genomic profiles, thus potentially assisting in identifying optimal therapeutic strategies for advanced GIST patients.

Molecular characteristics and immune microenvironment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: targets for therapeutic strategies

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours, arising mainly from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) of the gastrointestinal tract. As radiotherapy and chemotherapy are generally ineffective for GISTs, the current primary treatment is surgical resection. However, surgical resection is not choice for most patients. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. Targeted therapy, represented by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and immunotherapy, represented by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy (CAR-T), offer new therapeutic options in GISTs and have shown promising treatment responses. In this review, we summarize the molecular classification and immune microenvironment of GISTs and discuss the corresponding targeted therapy and immunotherapy options. This updated knowledge may provide more options for future therapeutic strategies and applications in GISTs.

Monitoring advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor with circulating tumor DNA

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the role of circulating tumor (ct)DNA as a biomarker for clinical decision-making and monitoring purposes in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. We discuss key insights from recent clinical trials and anticipate the future perspectives of ctDNA profiling within the clinical landscape of GIST.

RECENT FINDINGS

The identification and molecular characterization of KIT/platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) mutations from ctDNA in metastatic GIST is feasible and reliable. Such identification through ctDNA serves as a predictor of clinical outcomes to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in metastatic patients. Additionally, conjoined ctDNA analysis from clinical trials reveal the evolving mutational landscapes and increase in intratumoral heterogeneity across treatment lines. Together, this data positions ctDNA determination as a valuable tool for monitoring disease progression and guiding therapy in metastatic patients. These collective efforts culminated in the initiation of a ctDNA-based randomized clinical trial in GIST, marking a significant milestone in integrating ctDNA testing into the clinical care of GIST patients.

SUMMARY

The dynamic field of ctDNA technologies is rapidly evolving and holds significant promise for research. Several trials have successfully validated the clinical utility of ctDNA in metastatic GIST, laying the foundations for its prospective integration into the routine clinical management of GIST patients.

Clinical practice recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with solid cancer: a joint report from KSMO and KSP

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.

Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Solid Cancer: A Joint Report from KSMO and KSP

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.

Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with advanced cancer in 2024: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group

BACKGROUND

Advancements in the field of precision medicine have prompted the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Precision Medicine Working Group to update the recommendations for the use of tumour next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with advanced cancers in routine practice.

METHODS

The group discussed the clinical impact of tumour NGS in guiding treatment decision using the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) considering cost-effectiveness and accessibility.

RESULTS

As for 2020 recommendations, ESMO recommends running tumour NGS in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and ovarian cancer. Moreover, it is recommended to carry out tumour NGS in clinical research centres and under specific circumstances discussed with patients. In this updated report, the consensus within the group has led to an expansion of the recommendations to encompass patients with advanced breast cancer and rare tumours such as gastrointestinal stromal tumours, sarcoma, thyroid cancer, and cancer of unknown primary. Finally, ESMO recommends carrying out tumour NGS to detect tumour-agnostic alterations in patients with metastatic cancers where access to matched therapies is available.

CONCLUSION

Tumour NGS is increasingly expanding its scope and application within oncology with the aim of enhancing the efficacy of precision medicine for patients with cancer.

English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have been published in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2014 and 2017. A specialized team independent of the working group for the revision performed a systematic review. Since GIST is a rare type of tumor, clinical evidence is not sufficient to answer several clinical and background questions. Thus, in these guidelines, we considered that consensus among the experts who manage GIST, the balance between benefits and harms, patients' wishes, medical economic perspective, etc. are important considerations in addition to the evidence. Although guidelines for the treatment of GIST have also been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), there are some differences between the treatments proposed in those guidelines and the treatments in the present guidelines because of the differences in health insurance systems among countries.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic therapy versus surgical resection for 2-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A population-based comparative study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic therapy (ET) of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has become a viable treatment. We intended to compare long-term outcomes of ET versus surgical resection for 2-5 cm GIST using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to compare the long-term outcomes of patients treated with ET and surgical resection for GIST. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors for patients survival. To balance the clinicopathologic characteristics, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized.

RESULTS

A total of 749 patients with 2-5 cm GIST were enrolled, of whom 113 accepted ET and 636 underwent surgical resection. Before PSM, there was no significant difference in long-term outcomes between ET and surgical resection (5-year overall survival (OS): 93.5% vs. 91.6%, P=0.374; 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS): 99.1% vs. 96.5%, P=0.546; 10-year OS: 71.1% vs. 78.2%, P=0.374; 10-year CSS: 93.6% vs. 92.7%, P=0.546). After adjusting for the relevant variables using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, we observed that the ET and surgical resection groups were similar in OS (HR 0.726, 95%CI 0.457-1.153, P=0.175) and CSS (HR 1.286, 95%CI 0.474-3.488, P=0.621). After PSM, the long-term OS and CSS of patients with 2-5 cm GIST after ET and surgical resection were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the long-term survival of patients with 2-5 cm gastric GIST after ET and surgical resection were comparable. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the role of ET in 2-5 cm GIST.

KIT ATP-Binding Pocket/Activation Loop Mutations in GI Stromal Tumor: Emerging Mechanisms of Kinase Inhibitor Escape

PURPOSE

Imatinib resistance in GI stromal tumors (GISTs) is primarily caused by secondary KIT mutations, and clonal heterogeneity of these secondary mutations represents a major treatment obstacle. KIT inhibitors used after imatinib have clinical activity, albeit with limited benefit. Ripretinib is a potent inhibitor of secondary KIT mutations in the activation loop (AL). However, clinical benefit in fourth line remains limited and the molecular mechanisms of ripretinib resistance are largely unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Progressing lesions of 25 patients with GISTs refractory to ripretinib were sequenced for KIT resistance mutations. Resistant genotypes were validated and characterized using novel cell line models and in silico modeling.

RESULTS

GISTs progressing on ripretinib were enriched for secondary mutations in the ATP-binding pocket (AP), which frequently occur in cis with preexisting AL mutations, resulting in highly resistant AP/AL genotypes. AP/AL mutations were rarely observed in a cohort of progressing GIST samples from the preripretinib era but represented 50% of secondary KIT mutations in patients with tumors resistant to ripretinib. In GIST cell lines harboring secondary KIT AL mutations, the sole genomic escape mechanisms during ripretinib drug selection were AP/AL mutations. Ripretinib and sunitinib synergize against mixed clones with secondary AP or AL mutants but do not suppress clones with AP/AL genotypes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings underscore that KIT remains the central oncogenic driver even in late lines of GIST therapy. KIT-inhibitor combinations may suppress resistance because of secondary KIT mutations. However, the emergence of KIT AP/AL mutations after ripretinib treatment calls for new strategies in the development of next-generation KIT inhibitors.

Prices and Trends in FDA-Approved Medications for Sarcomas

Sarcomas represent a diverse set of both malignant and benign subtypes consisting of often rare and ultra-rare conditions. Over the course of the last decade, there have been numerous FDA approvals for agents treating various sarcoma subtypes. Given this burgeoning landscape of sarcoma treatments, we seek to review current FDA-approved agents with respect to their rates of incidence, approval rates, and financial costs. We gathered clinical trial data by searching FDA approval announcements from 2013 to 2023. We determined the 30 day and one year cost of therapy for patients of FDA-approved sarcoma treatments in the aforementioned timeframe. From 2013 to 2023, 14 medications have been FDA-approved for sarcoma subtypes. The 30-day dosing prices for these medications range from $11,162.86 to $46,926.00. Since 2013, the rates of approval for sarcoma medications have been higher than in prior decades. Nonetheless, there remains the potential for significant financial toxicity for patients living with sarcoma.

Opportunity in Complexity: Harnessing Molecular Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsies for Personalized Sarcoma Care

Due to their rarity and complexity, sarcomas represent a substantial therapeutic challenge. However, the incredible diversity within and across sarcoma subtypes presents an opportunity for personalized care to maximize efficacy and limit toxicity. A deeper understanding of the molecular alterations that drive sarcoma development and treatment response has paved the way for molecular biomarkers to shape sarcoma treatment. Genetic, transcriptomic, and protein biomarkers have become critical tools for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment selection in patients with sarcomas. In the future, emerging biomarkers like circulating tumor DNA analysis offer the potential to improve early detection, monitoring response to treatment, and identifying mechanisms of resistance to personalize sarcoma treatment. Here, we review the current state of molecular biomarkers for sarcomas and highlight opportunities and challenges for the implementation of new technologies in the future.

Precision Oncology in Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), including gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), are mesenchymal neoplasms with heterogeneous clinical behavior and represent broad categories comprising multiple distinct biologic entities. Multidisciplinary management of these rare tumors is critical. To date, multiple studies have outlined the importance of biological characterization of mesenchymal tumors and have identified key molecular alterations which drive tumor biology. GIST has represented a flagship for targeted therapy in solid tumors with the advent of imatinib which has revolutionized the way we treat this malignancy. Herein, the authors discuss the importance of biological and molecular diagnostics in managing STS and GIST patients.

A new green fluorimetric micelle complexation approach for reduction of the consumed solvent and quantification of avapritinib in biological fluids

Avapritinib (AVA) is the first medication authorized by the US-FDA in 2020 for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) that can't be treated by surgery. Cancer is among the most common causes of death worldwide and is the second most common cause of death after cardiovascular disease. Therefore, a quick, easy, sensitive, and straightforward fluorimetric approach was used to analyse AVA in pharmaceutical materials and blood plasma (pharmacokinetic). The suggested technique relies on 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS, pH 4) micellar system augmentation of the fluorescence of the tested drug. The technique demonstrated high relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) at 430 nm after excitation at 340 nm. Concentrations ranging from 20.0-400.0 ng mL-1 with a limit of quantitation of 9.47 ng mL-1 were used to obtain luminescence data for the studied medicine. In addition, the quantum yield of the AVA fluorescence was increased with the gradual addition of a surfactant at a concentration above its critical micellar level. This knowledge has been exploited to enhance the effectiveness of a spectrofluorometric technique for the estimation of AVA in human plasma (98.95 ± 1.22%) and uniformity tests with greenness assessments. The conditions for enhanced fluorescence were optimized and fully validated using US-FDA and International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) rules. This innovative strategy was expanded for AVA stability research in human plasma across various circumstances. This approach is an eco-friendly solution compared to traditional testing methods that use hazardous chemicals.

The GIST of it all: management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) from the first steps to tailored therapy. A bibliometric analysis

PURPOSE

Improvement of patient care is associated with increasing publication numbers in biomedical research. However, such increasing numbers of publications make it challenging for physicians and scientists to screen and process the literature of their respective fields. In this study, we present a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the evolution of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) research, analyzing the current state of the field and identifying key open questions going beyond the recent advantages for future studies to assess.

METHODS

Using the Web of Science Core Collection, 5040 GIST-associated publications in the years 1984-2022 were identified and analyzed regarding key bibliometric variables using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer software.

RESULTS

GIST-associated publication numbers substantially increased over time, accentuated from year 2000 onwards, and being characterized by multinational collaborations. The main topic clusters comprise surgical management, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) development/treatment, diagnostic workup, and molecular pathophysiology. Within all main topic clusters, a significant progress is reflected by the literature over the years. This progress ranges from conventional open surgical techniques over minimally invasive, including robotic and endoscopic, resection techniques to increasing identification of specific functional genetic aberrations sensitizing for newly developed TKIs being extensively investigated in clinical studies and implemented in GIST treatment guidelines. However, especially in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease stages, surgery-related questions and certain specific questions concerning (further-line) TKI treatment resistance were infrequently addressed.

CONCLUSION

Increasing GIST-related publication numbers reflect a continuous progress in the major topic clusters of the GIST research field. Especially in advanced disease stages, questions related to the interplay between surgical approaches and TKI treatment sensitivity should be addressed in future studies.

Ocular surface toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies

Cancer treatments have recently shifted from broad-spectrum cytotoxic therapies to more focused treatments, maximizing anticancerous activity while reducing toxicity to healthy cells. These modern anticancer therapies (MATs) encompass a wide range of innovative molecules that include immune checkpoint inhibitors and other targeted anticancer therapies, comprising antibody drug conjugates and inhibitors of signal transduction. Some MATs are associated with ocular surface adverse events that can cause severe discomfort and even lead to loss of vision. While these complications remain rare, they are probably underreported. It is likely that both oncologists and ophthalmologists will come across MATs-associated ocular surface-adverse events in their practices, owing to the increasing number of patients being treated with MATs. Rapid identification of ocular surface-adverse events is crucial, as early intervention can manage these conditions to avoid vision loss and reduce negative impacts on quality of life. We discuss characteristics of ocular surface pathologies attributed to MATs, describe the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and outline the main lines of treatment.

KIT/PDGFRA inhibitors for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: getting to the gist of the problem

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 90% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are driven by activating mutations in receptor tyrosine-kinases KIT or PDGFRA. Despite the outstanding results of first-line imatinib in advanced GIST, resistance ultimately occurs mainly through secondary mutations in KIT/PDGFRA. Other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with a broader spectrum of activity against these mutations are approved after imatinib failure. However, response rates and progression-free survival are drastically lower compared to imatinib. Notably, imatinib also triggers early tolerance adaptation mechanisms, which precede the occurrence of secondary mutations.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we outline the current landscape of KIT inhibitors, discuss the novel agents, and present additional biological pathways that may be therapeutically exploitable.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of broad-spectrum and highly selective TKIs able to induce a sustained KIT/PDGFRA inhibition is the pillar of preclinical and clinical investigation in GIST. However, it is now recognized that the situation is more intricate, with various factors interacting with KIT and PDGFRA, playing a crucial role in the response and resistance to treatments. Future strategies in the management of advanced GIST should integrate driver inhibition with the blockade of other molecules to enhance cell death and establish enduring responses in patients.

Outcomes of Late-Line Systemic Treatment in GIST: Does Sequence Matter?

Ripretinib and avapritinib have demonstrated activity in the late-line treatment of gastrointestinal stomal tumors (GISTs). We investigated whether patients previously treated with ripretinib benefit from avapritinib, and vice versa. Patients diagnosed with metastatic/unresectable GIST and treated with both drugs at two institutions in 2000-2021 were included. Patients were grouped by drug sequence: ripretinib-avapritinib (RA) or avapritinib-ripretinib (AR). Radiographic response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-four patients (17 per group) were identified, with a median age of 48 years. The most common primary site was the small bowel (17/34, 50%), followed by the stomach (10/34, 29.4%). Baseline characteristics and tumor mutations were not significantly different between groups. Response rates (RRs) for ripretinib were 18% for RA and 12% for AR; RRs for avapritinib were 12% for AR and 18% for RA. Median TTPs for ripretinib were 3.65 months (95%CI 2-5.95) for RA and 4.73 months (1.87-15.84) for AR. Median TTPs for avapritinib were 5.39 months (2.86-18.99) for AR and 4.11 months (1.91-11.4) for RA. Median OS rates following RA or AR initiation were 29.63 (95%CI 13.8-50.53) and 33.7 (20.03-50.57) months, respectively. Both ripretinib and avapritinib were efficacious in the late-line treatment of GIST, with no evidence that efficacy depended on sequencing.

Avapritinib-based SAR studies unveil a binding pocket in KIT and PDGFRA

Avapritinib is the only potent and selective inhibitor approved for the treatment of D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), the most common primary mutation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA). The approval was based on the NAVIGATOR trial, which revealed overall response rates of more than 90%. Despite this transformational activity, patients eventually progress, mostly due to acquired resistance mutations or following discontinuation due to neuro-cognitive side effects. These patients have no therapeutic alternative and face a dismal prognosis. Notable, little is known about this drug's binding mode and its medicinal chemistry development, which is instrumental for the development of the next generation of drugs. Against this background, we solve the crystal structures of avapritinib in complex with wild-type and mutant PDGFRA and stem cell factor receptor (KIT), which provide evidence and understanding of inhibitor binding and lead to the identification of a sub-pocket (Gα-pocket). We utilize this information to design, synthesize and characterize avapritinib derivatives for the determination of key pharmacophoric features to overcome drug resistance and limit potential blood-brain barrier penetration.

Analysis of Potential Circular RNAs in Regulating Imatinib Resistance of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have found that circular RNA is an abundant RNA species that belongs to part of the competing endogenous RNA network (ceRNA), which was proven to play an important role in the development, diagnosis and progress of diseases. However, the function of circRNAs in imatinib resistance in Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are poorly understood so for. The present study aimed to screen and predict the potential circRNAs in imatinib resistance of GIST using microarray analysis.

METHODS

We determined the expression of circular RNAs in paired normal gastric tissues (N), primary GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) tissues (YC) and imatinib mesylate secondary resistance GIST tissues (C) with microarray and predicted 8677 dysregulated circular RNAs.

RESULTS

Compared with the YC group, we identified 15 circRNAs that were up-regulated and 8 circRNAs that were down-regulated in the C group. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis indicated that these host linear transcripts that differentially express circular RNAs are involved in many key biological pathways, predicting the potential tumor-genesis and drug resistance mechanismrelated to HIF-1 pathway, later we draw the cirRNA-miRNA-mRNA network involved in the HIF-1 pathway and found several dysregulated circRNAs and the relationship between circRNA-miRNAs-mRNA, such as circRNA_06551, circRNA_14668, circRNA_04497, circRNA_08683, circRNA_09923(Green, down-regulation) and circRNA_23636, circRNA_15734 (Red, up-regulation).

CONCLUSION

Taken together, we identified a panel of dysregulated circRNAs that may be potential biomarkers even therapy relevant to the GIST, especially imatinib secondary resistance GIST.

Unlocking the synthetic approaches and clinical application of approved small-molecule drugs for gastrointestinal cancer treatment: A comprehensive exploration

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers encompass a group of malignancies affecting the digestive system, including the stomach, esophagus, liver, colon, rectum and pancreas. These cancers represent a significant global health burden, necessitating effective treatment strategies. Small-molecule drugs have emerged as crucial therapeutic options in the fight against GI cancers due to their oral bioavailability, targeted mechanisms of action, and well-established safety profiles. The review then elucidates the clinical applications and synthetic methods of clinically approved small-molecule drugs for the treatment of GI cancer, shedding light on their mechanisms of action and their potential in mitigating GI cancer progression. The review also discusses future prospects and the evolving landscape of small-molecule drug development in GI oncology, highlighting the potential for personalized medicine. In summary, this review provides valuable insights into cutting-edge strategies for harnessing clinically approved small-molecule drugs to combat GI cancer effectively.