Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in advanced gastric cancer

Efficacy of ramucirumab combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line therapy

FOLFOX plus nivolumab represents a standard of care for first-line therapy of advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) with positive PD-L1 expression. The efficacy of second-line VEGFR-2 inhibition with ramucirumab (RAM) plus chemotherapy after progression to immunochemotherapy remains unclear. Medical records of patients with aGEC enrolled in the randomized phase II AIO-STO-0417 trial after treatment failure to first-line FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on second-line therapy: RAM plus chemotherapy (RAM group) or treatment without RAM (control group). Eighty three patients were included. In the overall population, progression-free survival (PFS) in the RAM group was superior to the control (4.5 vs 2.9 months). Responders (CR/PR) to first-line immunochemotherapy receiving RAM containing second-line therapy had prolonged OS from start of first-line therapy (28.9 vs 16.5 months), as well as second-line OS (9.6 vs 7.5 months), PFS (5.6 vs 2.9 months) and DCR (53% vs 29%) compared to the control. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was 42% and 44% for the RAM and the control, respectively. Patients with CPS ≥1 in the RAM group showed better tumor control (ORR 25% vs 10%) and improved survival (total OS 11.5 vs 8.0 months; second-line OS 6.5 vs 3.9 months; PFS 4.5 vs 1.6 months) compared to the control. Prior exposure to first-line FOLFOX plus dual checkpoint inhibition followed by RAM plus chemotherapy shows favorable response and survival rates especially in patients with initial response and positive PD-L1 expression and has the potential to advance the treatment paradigm in aGEC.

Lenvatinib-Loaded Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Nanoparticles with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Conjugation as a Preclinical Approach to Therapeutically Improve Thyroid Cancer with Aggressive Behavior

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of progressive and radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), is associated with significant adverse effects that can be partially mitigated through the development of novel drug formulations. The utilization of nanoparticles presents a viable option, as it allows for targeted drug delivery, reducing certain side effects and enhancing the overall quality of life for patients. This study aimed to produce and assess, both in vitro and in vivo, the cytotoxicity, biodistribution, and therapeutic efficacy of lenvatinib-loaded PLGA nanoparticles (NPs), both with and without decoration using antibody conjugation (cetuximab), as a novel therapeutic approach for managing aggressive thyroid tumors.

METHODS

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (NPs), decorated with or without anti-EGFR, were employed as a lenvatinib delivery system. These NPs were characterized for size distribution, surface morphology, surface charge, and drug encapsulation efficiency. Cytotoxicity was evaluated through MTT assays using two cellular models, one representing normal thyroid cells (Nthy-ori 3-1) and the other representing anaplastic thyroid cells (CAL-62). Additionally, an in vivo xenograft mouse model was established to investigate biodistribution and therapeutic efficacy following intragastric administration.

RESULTS

The NPs demonstrated success in terms of particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential, morphology, encapsulation efficiency, and cetuximab distribution across the surface. In vitro analysis revealed cytotoxicity in both cellular models with both formulations, but only the decorated NPs achieved an ID50 value in CAL-62 cells. Biodistribution analysis following intragastric administration in xenografted thyroid mice demonstrated good stability in terms of intestinal barrier function and tumor accumulation. Both formulations were generally well tolerated without inducing pathological effects in the examined organs. Importantly, both formulations increased tumor necrosis; however, decorated NPs exhibited enhanced parameters related to apoptotic/karyolytic forms, mitotic index, and vascularization compared with NPs without decoration.

CONCLUSIONS

These proof-of-concept findings suggest a promising strategy for administering TKIs in a more targeted and effective manner.

Successes and failures of angiogenesis blockade in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Gastric and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEA) remains a considerable major public health problem worldwide, being the fifth most common cancer with a fatality-to-case ratio that stands still at 70%. Angiogenesis, which is a well-established cancer hallmark, exerts a fundamental role in cancer initiation and progression and its targeting has been actively pursued as a promising therapeutic strategy in GEA. A wealth of clinical trials has been conducted, investigating anti-angiogenic agents including VEGF-directed monoclonal antibodies, small molecules tyrosine kinase inhibitors and VEGF-Trap agents both in the resectable and advanced setting, reporting controversial results. While phase III randomized trials testing the anti-VEGFR-2 antibody Ramucirumab and the selective VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor Apatinib demonstrated a significant survival benefit in later lines, the shift of angiogenesis inhibitors in the perioperative and first-line setting failed to improve patients' outcome in GEAs. The molecular landscape of disease, together with novel combinatorial strategies and biomarker-selected approaches are under investigation as key elements to the success of angiogenesis blockade in GEA. In this article, we critically review the existing literature on the biological rationale and clinical development of antiangiogenic agents in GEA, discussing major achievements, limitations and future developments, aiming at fully realizing the potential of this therapeutic approach.

Tumor vessel normalization and immunotherapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignant tumor, and patients with GC have a low survival rate due to limited effective treatment methods. Angiogenesis and immune evasion are two key processes in GC progression, and they act synergistically to promote tumor progression. Tumor vascular normalization has been shown to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy, which in turn may be improved through enhanced immune stimulation. Therefore, it may be interesting to identify synergies between immunomodulatory agents and anti-angiogenic therapies in GC. This strategy aims to normalize the tumor microenvironment through the action of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor while stimulating the immune response through immunotherapy and prolonging the survival of GC patients.

Lenvatinib Plus Camrelizumab vs. Lenvatinib Monotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Combining an antiangiogenic agent with an anti-PD-1 agent is a promising strategy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Aims

To explore the effectiveness and tolerability of lenvatinib plus camrelizumab vs. lenvatinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable HCC.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with unresectable HCC treated with oral lenvatinib 8 mg daily and intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (L+C group) or lenvatinib 12 mg or 8 mg daily (L group) in four Chinese centers between September 2018 and February 2020. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. The outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), 1-year OS rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

Results

By March 31, 2021, 92 patients were finally included, with 48 and 44 in the L+C and L groups, respectively. ORR was significantly higher in the L+C group than in the L group (RECIST 1.1: 37.5% vs. 13.6%, P=0.009; mRECIST: 41.7% vs. 20.5%, P=0.029). Median OS and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 13.9 (13.3-18.3) months in the L group and not reached in the L+C group (P=0.015). The 1-year survival rate was 79.2% and 56.8% in the L+C and L groups, respectively. Median PFS was 10.3 (6.6-14.0) months and 7.5 (5.7-9.3) months in the L+C and L groups, respectively (P=0.0098). Combined therapy vs. monotherapy was independently associated with a prolonged OS (hazard ratio=0.380, 95% CI=: 0.196-0.739, P=0.004) and a prolonged PFS (hazard ratio=0.454, 95%CI=0.282-0.731, P=0.001). The safety profile was comparable between the two groups. The most common adverse event in the L+C and L groups was loss of appetite (41.7% vs. 40.9%, P=0.941). Three patients in the L+C group and two in the L group terminated treatment owing to adverse events.

Conclusion

First-line lenvatinib plus camrelizumab showed better effectiveness than lenvatinib alone in patients with unresectable HCC.

Lenvatinib Targets FGF Receptor 4 to Enhance Antitumor Immune Response of Anti-Programmed Cell Death-1 in HCC

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently, clinical trials of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in HCC have displayed an impressive objective response rate. This study aimed to clarify the mechanism for optimal patient selection.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

First, in patients with HCC, lenvatinib-treated recurrent tumors had lower programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and regulatory T cell (Treg) infiltration compared with matched primary tumors. Consistently, in C57BL/6 wild-type mice receiving anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy, PD-L1 expression and Treg infiltration in s.c. tumors were reduced when adding lenvatinib to the scheme. Mechanistically, on the one hand, FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4) was the most pivotal target in PD-L1 down-regulation by lenvatinib in vitro. Furthermore, lenvatinib reinforced the proteasomal degradation of PD-L1 by blocking the FGFR4-glycogen synthase kinase 3β axis and rescued the sensitivity of interferon-γ-pretreated HCC cells to T-cell killing by targeting FGFR4. On the other hand, the level of IL-2 increased after anti-PD-1 treatment, but IL-2-mediated Treg differentiation was blocked by lenvatinib through targeting FGFR4 to restrain signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) phosphorylation. By regulating the variations in the number of Tregs and the tumor FGFR4 level in C57BL/6-forkhead box protein P3 (Foxp3^DTR ) mice, we found that high levels of FGFR4 and Treg infiltration sensitized tumors to the combination treatment. Finally, high levels of FGFR4 and Foxp3 conferred immune tolerance but better response to the combined therapy in patient cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib reduced tumor PD-L1 level and Treg differentiation to improve anti-PD-1 efficacy by blocking FGFR4. Levels of FGFR4 expression and Treg infiltration in tumor could serve as biomarkers for screening patients with HCC using lenvatinib plus anti-PD-1 combination therapy.

Significance of Tumor Mutation Burden Combined With Immune Infiltrates in the Progression and Prognosis of Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a serious malignant tumor with high mortality and poor prognosis. The prognosis and survival are much worse for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Recently, immunotherapy has been widely promoted for AGC patients, and studies have shown that tumor mutation burden (TMB) is closely related to immunotherapy response. Here, RNA-seq data, matched clinical information, and MAF files were downloaded from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA)-STAD project in the TCGA database. The collation and visual analysis of mutation data were implemented by the “maftools” package in R. We calculated the TMB values for AGC patients and divided the patients into high- and low-TMB groups according to the median value of TMB. Then, the correlation between high or low TMB and clinicopathological parameters was calculated. Next, we examined the differences in gene expression patterns between the two groups by using the “limma” R package and identified the immune-related genes among the DEGs. Through univariate Cox regression analysis, 15 genes related to prognosis were obtained. Furthermore, the two hub genes (APOD and SLC22A17) were used to construct a risk model to evaluate the prognosis of AGC patients. ROC and survival curves and GEO data were used as a validation set to verify the reliability of this risk model. In addition, the correlation between TMB and tumor-infiltrating immune cells was examined. In conclusion, our results suggest that AGC patients with high TMB have a better prognosis. By testing the patient’s TMB, we could better guide immunotherapy and understand patient response to immunotherapy.

Significance of Tumor Mutation Burden Combined With Immune Infiltrates in the Progression and Prognosis of Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a serious malignant tumor with high mortality and poor prognosis. The prognosis and survival are much worse for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Recently, immunotherapy has been widely promoted for AGC patients, and studies have shown that tumor mutation burden (TMB) is closely related to immunotherapy response. Here, RNA-seq data, matched clinical information, and MAF files were downloaded from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA)-STAD project in the TCGA database. The collation and visual analysis of mutation data were implemented by the “maftools” package in R. We calculated the TMB values for AGC patients and divided the patients into high- and low-TMB groups according to the median value of TMB. Then, the correlation between high or low TMB and clinicopathological parameters was calculated. Next, we examined the differences in gene expression patterns between the two groups by using the “limma” R package and identified the immune-related genes among the DEGs. Through univariate Cox regression analysis, 15 genes related to prognosis were obtained. Furthermore, the two hub genes (APOD and SLC22A17) were used to construct a risk model to evaluate the prognosis of AGC patients. ROC and survival curves and GEO data were used as a validation set to verify the reliability of this risk model. In addition, the correlation between TMB and tumor-infiltrating immune cells was examined. In conclusion, our results suggest that AGC patients with high TMB have a better prognosis. By testing the patient’s TMB, we could better guide immunotherapy and understand patient response to immunotherapy.

The safety and efficacy of lenvatinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

China has one of the highest incidence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the world. As most patients are diagnosed with advanced or unretractable HCC, systematic therapy is still the main treatment method for HCC. Currently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are both the chief systematic therapy. And some studies have shown that the combination of TKIs and ICIs is more effective than monotherapy. The purpose of this review is to outline the rationale for the combination between lenvatinib and anti-PD-1(programmed cell death 1) and clinical trials to support this "golden combination". We also discuss the commonly treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and solutions for the patients with HCC who received the combination between lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Finally, we focus on the novel approaches, future perspectives and potential challenges about the combination of TKIs and ICIs.

Precision Medicine to Treat Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Work in Progress

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) represents a heterogeneous disease and, when diagnosed as locally advanced or metastatic, it is characterized by poor prognosis. During the last few years, several molecular classifications have been proposed to try to personalize treatment for those patients diagnosed with advanced disease. Nevertheless, despite the great effort, precision medicine is still far from being a reality. The improvement in the molecular analysis due to the application of high throughput technologies based on DNA and RNA sequencing has opened a novel scenario leading to the personalization of treatment. The possibility to target epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2, Claudine, Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFR), and other alterations with a molecular matched therapy could significantly improve clinical outcomes over advanced gastric cancer patients. On the other hand, the development of immunotherapy could also represent a promising strategy in a selected population. In this review, we sought to describe the novel pathways implicated in GEA progression and the results of the molecular matched therapies.