Carboplatin plus etoposide versus topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

Prophylactic cerebral irradiation sensitizes relapsed sensitive small cell lung cancer to temozolomide: A retrospective cohort study

Prophylactic cerebral irradiation (PCI) reduces the rate of brain metastasis and improves the prognosis of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but little is known about the effect of PCI on second-line chemotherapy in patients with relapsed sensitive SCLC. This retrospective cohort study included a total of 164 patients with relapsed sensitive SCLC, 20 of whom were administered temozolomide (TMZ). Categorical clinical variables were compared between subgroups with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, continuous clinical variables were compared with the t-test or one-way ANOVA, and the impact on overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test. In general, TMZ prolonged the OS of patients with SCLC with brain metastasis from 12.0 to 19.0 months [P=0.0109, hazard ratio (HR): 0.4789, 95% CI: 0.2470-0.9287]. Furthermore, the administration of PCI improved the effects of TMZ on patients with SCLC with brain metastasis, with an increase in OS from 16.0 to 36.5 months (P=0.0017, HR: 3.634, 95% CI: 1.083-12.20); additionally, no difference was observed on the basis of the history of chemotherapy or state of brain metastasis. For the local response evaluation, the overall response rate reached 75.0% for both brain metastasis and extracranial lesions in the two-cycle evaluation, remained at 30.0 and 25.0% in the four-cycle and more-cycle evaluations, respectively, and was minimally influenced by the history of chemotherapy or PCI. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that PCI may be valuable for patients with relapsed sensitive SCLC with brain metastasis who are receiving TMZ treatment, and it may also serve as an effective regimen to prevent local progression of extracranial lesions; however, more evidence is needed.

Clinical significance of post‑progression survival after chemoradiotherapy on overall survival in limited‑disease small cell lung cancer

Overall survival (OS) among patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) receiving chemoradiotherapy can be significantly influenced by subsequent treatments. Thus, the present study aimed to examine the interplay between progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) and OS in patients with LD-SCLC undergoing chemoradiotherapy. This study retrospectively analyzed 84 patients with relapsed LD-SCLC who received chemoradiotherapy between April 2007 and June 2021. The correlations between PFS and OS as well as PPS and OS post-chemoradiotherapy were analyzed at the individual patient level. Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression analyses revealed a robust correlation between PPS and OS (r=0.76; P<0.05; R2=0.85). PFS was moderately correlated with OS (r=0.57; P<0.05; R2=0.25). Furthermore, the presence of liver metastases upon relapse and the administration of platinum re-challenge chemotherapy were significantly associated with PPS (P<0.05). The analysis of relationships between OS and PFS as well as OS and PPS in this patient cohort revealed that OS was more strongly correlated with PPS than PFS. These findings suggest that factors such as liver metastases at relapse and the administration of platinum re-challenge chemotherapy may influence PPS.

Clinical progress of B7-H3 targeted antibody drug conjugate ifinatamab deruxtecan for small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options and poor prognosis, particularly at extensive stage. While first-line platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-L1 therapy improves survival, most patients relapse, highlighting the need for novel therapies.

AREAS COVERED

B7-Homolog3 (B7-H3), an immune checkpoint molecule overexpressed in SCLC, has emerged as a promising therapeutic target. Ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting B7-H3, delivering a topoisomerase I inhibitor. Early clinical trials (IDeate-PanTumor01 and IDeate-Lung01) have demonstrated encouraging results in pretreated ES-SCLC. In the 12 mg/kg cohort of IDeate-Lung01, I-DXd achieved an objective response rate of 54.8%, median progression-free survival of 5.5 months, and median overall survival of 11.8 months. Notably, it showed intracranial activity with a central nervous system-confirmed response rate of 37.8%.

EXPERT OPINION

I-DXd is currently being evaluated in the phase III IDeate-Lung02 trial. Its promising efficacy, manageable safety profile, and potential in combination strategies position it as a key candidate for future SCLC treatment.

Bousigonine D from Bousigonia mekongensis inhibits bladder cancer growth and overcomes cisplatin resistance

The rising global incidence of bladder cancer and chemotherapy resistance necessitate novel therapies. Plant-derived compounds, owing to their diverse biological activities and favorable safety profiles, are considered promising candidates for cancer treatment. In this study, we investigated Bousigonine D, a monoterpene indole alkaloid isolated from the roots of Bousigonia mekongensis, for its potential as a therapeutic agent for bladder cancer. Our results show that Bousigonine D effectively inhibits cell proliferation and clonogenic formation, and induces cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase in murine and human bladder cancer cells. Furthermore, Bousigonine D significantly promotes apoptosis in these cells, surpassing the apoptosis-inducing efficacy of cisplatin. Mechanistically, Bousigonine D enhances the generation of reactive oxygen species, disrupts calcium homeostasis, and impairs mitochondrial function, leading to cytoskeletal collapse and caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death. In vivo, Bousigonine D effectively suppresses tumor growth in an orthotopic MB49 mouse model, and importantly, it retains strong anti-tumor efficacy in cisplatin-resistant bladder cancer. Notably, Bousigonine D exhibits low toxicity in major organs, similar to cisplatin, underscoring its potential as a safe and effective treatment for bladder cancer. This study highlights the promising role of plant-derived compounds in cancer therapy and supports further development of Bousigonine D as a novel therapeutic option for bladder cancer.

Aumolertinib in combination with Lastet in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (EVOLUTION): protocol for a single-arm, phase II clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Targeted therapy is now the standard treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, yet resistance continues to be a significant challenge. Enhancing the efficacy of targeted therapies and prolonging patient survival remain critical clinical priorities. Although combining third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with intravenous chemotherapy has demonstrated promising results, it is unclear if oral chemotherapy regimens combined with EGFR TKIs could also improve survival outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

EVOLUTION is a multicentre, phase II clinical trial conducted across three tertiary hospitals in China: Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (lead centre), Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University and Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University. The study will enrol 60 patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer harbouring EGFR-sensitive mutations who have not previously undergone systemic therapy. Participants will be administered a combination regimen of aumolertinib (110 mg orally, once a day in a 28-day cycle, continuously) and Lastet (25 mg orally, administered in a 28-day cycle, with 2 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate and duration of response. Tumour response will be assessed by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Patient enrolment is currently underway.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital in April 2024 (approval number: L23-334). Patients will participate after providing informed consent. The results of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06463171.

CD274 (PD-L1) Polymorphisms as Predictors of Efficacy in First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

The cornerstone of first-line treatment in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is platinum- and etoposide-based chemotherapy. Platinum compounds could immunomodulate the tumor microenvironment in addition to their cytotoxic effect. Genetic variation in immune checkpoint (IC) pathways may predict chemotherapy efficacy. Polymorphisms in the IC genes were determined, and their association with survival was analyzed in 78 patients with ES-SCLC treated with chemotherapy. PD-L1 protein expression in tumor tissue was determined. Three variants in CD274 were associated with better median progression-free survival (mPFS): rs2297136 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.93; p = 0.03), rs2282055 (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.64; p = 0.005), and rs822336 (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.73; p = 0.002). CTLA4 rs231775 was also associated with mPFS (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.63; p = 0.002). The variants CD274 rs2297136 and CD274 rs822336 were associated with platinum sensitivity (odds ratio [OR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.70; p = 0.02, and OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.46; p = 0.005, respectively). CD274 rs2297136 was also associated with better overall survival (p = 0.02), but not after adjustment for covariates. No association was found between CD274 germline variants and PD-L1 tumor expression. Our results suggest that CD274 and CTLA4 variants may be predictive biomarkers for platinum plus etoposide treatment in ES-SCLC.

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with small-cell lung cancer following failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options, especially after the failure of first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy. This study evaluated the treatment patterns and survival outcomes of Taiwanese patients with SCLC following 1L treatment failure, focusing on the effects of treatment-free interval (TFI).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 287 patients with SCLC from 2012 to 2021. Data on clinical characteristics, systemic treatments after 1L failure, and survival status were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined in analyses stratified by TFI. TFI < 90 days and ≥ 90 days denoted resistant relapse and sensitive relapse, respectively.

RESULTS

Second-line (2L) and third-line (3L) chemotherapy was administered to 76% and 54.1% of patients, respectively. Topotecan was administered to 25.4% of patients, primarily those with TFI 90-179 days. Platinum rechallenge was administered to 8.4% of patients, primarily those with TFI ≥ 180 days. The median PFS of patients with 2L treatment was 2.3 months (95% CI 2.2-2.6), and the median OS was 5.1 months (95% CI 4.3-6.2). Patients with TFI ≥ 90 days had significantly longer PFS (2.6 vs 2.2 months, P = 0.011) and OS (9.6 vs 4.0 months, P < 0.0001) than did those with TFI < 90 days. Platinum rechallenge showed similar efficacy to topotecan in patients with sensitive relapse (3.0 vs 2.7 months, P = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival outcomes in patients with relapsed SCLC remain poor, particularly in those with platinum-resistant relapse. Our findings highlight the importance of optimizing 1L treatment for delaying disease progression. More effective 2L therapies should be developed to improve survival outcomes in patients with relapsed SCLC.

Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review

Importance

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma with an incidence of 4.7 cases per 100 000 individuals in 2021 in the US and a 5-year overall survival of 12% to 30%.

Observations

Cigarette smoking is the primary risk factor for development of SCLC, as 95% of patients diagnosed with SCLC have a history of tobacco use. Patients with SCLC may present with respiratory symptoms such as cough (40%), shortness of breath (34%), hemoptysis (10%), or metastases with corresponding local symptoms (30%) such as pleuritis or bone pain; approximately 60% of patients with SCLC may be asymptomatic at diagnosis. Chest imaging may demonstrate central hilar (85%) or mediastinal lymphadenopathy (75%). At diagnosis, approximately 15% of patients have brain metastases, which may present as headache or focal weakness. Diagnosis is confirmed by biopsy of a primary lung mass, thoracic lymph node, or metastatic lesion. Small cell lung cancer is classified into limited stage (LS-SCLC; 30%) vs extensive stage (ES-SCLC; 70%) based on whether the disease can be treated within a radiation field that is typically confined to 1 hemithorax but may include contralateral mediastinal and supraclavicular nodes. For patients with LS-SCLC, surgery or concurrent chemotherapy with platinum-etoposide and radiotherapy is potentially curative in 30% of patients. More recently, median survival for LS-SCLC has reached up to 55.9 months with the addition of durvalumab, an immunotherapy. First-line treatment for ES-SCLC is combined treatment with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy and immunotherapy with the programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors durvalumab or atezolizumab followed by maintenance immunotherapy until disease progression or toxicity. Although initial rates of tumor shrinkage are 60% to 70% with platinum-etoposide and immunotherapy treatment, the median overall survival of patients treated for ES-SCLC is approximately 12 to 13 months, with 60% of patients relapsing within 3 months. Second-line therapy for patients with ES-SCLC includes the DNA-alkylating agent lurbinectedin (35% overall response rate; median progression-free survival, 3.7 months) and a bispecific T-cell engager against delta-like ligand 3, tarlatamab (40% overall response rate; median progression-free survival, 4.9 months).

Conclusions and Relevance

Small cell lung cancer is a smoking-related malignancy that presents at an advanced stage in 70% of patients. Three-year overall survival is approximately 56.5% for LS-SCLC and 17.6% for ES-SCLC. First-line treatment for LS-SCLC is radiation targeting the tumor given concurrently with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation immunotherapy. For ES-SCLC, first-line treatment is chemotherapy and immunotherapy followed by maintenance immunotherapy.

Nanomedicine Innovations for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy

Lung cancer remains a challenge within the realm of oncology. Characterized by late-stage diagnosis and resistance to conventional treatments, the currently available therapeutic strategies encompass surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and biological therapy; however, overall patient survival remains suboptimal. Nanotechnology has ushered in a new era by offering innovative nanomaterials with the potential to precisely target cancer cells while sparing healthy tissues. It holds the potential to reshape the landscape of cancer management, offering hope for patients and clinicians. The assessment of these nanotechnologies follows a rigorous evaluation process similar to that applied to chemical drugs, which includes considerations of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicology, and clinical effectiveness. However, because of the characteristics of nanoparticles, standard toxicological tests require modifications to accommodate their unique characteristics. Effective therapeutic strategies demand a profound understanding of the disease and consideration of clinical outcomes, physicochemical attributes of nanomaterials, nanobiointeractions, nanotoxicity, and regulatory compliance to ensure patient safety. This review explores the promise of nanomedicine in lung cancer treatment by capitalizing on its unique physicochemical properties. We address the multifaceted challenges of lung cancer and its tumor microenvironment and provide an overview of recent developments in nanoplatforms for early diagnosis and treatment that can enhance patient outcomes and overall quality of life.

Real-world evidence in extensive disease small cell lung cancer: The missing piece of the puzzle

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive disease, often diagnosed at an advanced stage and with limited treatment options. In recent years, immunotherapy has been approved in combination with chemotherapy in the first line setting of extensive stage disease (ES-SCLC). However, only 10-15 % of patients with ES-SCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy (CT-IO) experience a long-term benefit. In addition, patients are often clinically frail due to advanced age, comorbidities, and disease-related symptoms, making SCLC a challenging condition. Real-world evidence (RWE) becomes particularly valuable in this scenario, not only to confirm the results of pivotal trials, but also to evaluate the outcomes of CT-IO in populations that are generally excluded from clinical trials. RWE could also define the role of integrative treatments such as thoracic consolidation radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation, which are used in selected patients in the clinical practice but were scarcely applied in pivotal trials. In this review, we focused on RWE in ES-SCLC, with the aim of improving clinical decision making. Notably, real-world data have largely confirmed the efficacy and safety of CT-IO observed in pivotal clinical trials, with a possible benefit even in more fragile patients. However, these studies also highlight that a significant proportion of the ES-SCLC population remains untreated due to poor clinical conditions.

Phase 2 Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC: Results From TROPiCS-03

INTRODUCTION

The phase 2 TROPiCS-03 study evaluated the efficacy/safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) as second-line treatment in patients with previously treated extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

TROPiCS-03 (NCT03964727) is a multicohort, open-label, phase 2 basket study of solid tumors, including ES-SCLC. Adults with ES-SCLC that progressed after one previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (PD-[L]1) therapy received SG 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Key secondary end points included investigator-assessed duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS); blinded independent central review-assessed ORR, DOR, and PFS; overall survival (OS); and safety. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive disease.

RESULTS

Among 43 patients (median follow-up, 12.3 [range, 8.1-20.1] mo), investigator-assessed ORR was 41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.0%-57.9%), with 18 confirmed partial responses; median (95% CI) DOR, PFS, and OS were 4.73 (3.52-6.70), 4.40 (3.81-6.11), and 13.60 (6.57-14.78) months, respectively. The efficacy results of the blinded independent central review assessments were similar. The investigator-assessed ORR (95% CI) was 35.0% (15.4%-59.2%) in patients with platinum-resistant disease (n = 20) and 47.8% (26.8%-69.4%) in patients with platinum-sensitive disease (n = 23). Furthermore, 32 patients (74.4%) had grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No TEAE led to SG discontinuation; one treatment-related TEAE (neutropenic sepsis) led to death.

CONCLUSIONS

SG has promising efficacy as second-line treatment of ES-SCLC, irrespective of platinum sensitivity. Safety was manageable and consistent with that observed in other SG studies.

Lurbinectedin is an effective alternative to platinum rechallenge and may restore platinum sensitivity in patients with sensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Platinum rechallenge is recommended for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapse ≥90 days after completing first-line chemotherapy, although it may not always be the most suitable option.

AREAS COVERED

Articles for review were identified via PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov searches, supplemented with non-indexed publications (e.g. conference abstracts) known to the manufacturer. We examined evidence for platinum re-exposure in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC, and present lurbinectedin as a potential alternative. The complementary mechanisms of action of lurbinectedin and platinum, owing to opposite sensitivity of SCLC cells, may resensitize tumor cells to platinum. As efficacy outcomes with lurbinectedin are equivalent or better than those with platinum rechallenge and its hematological safety profile is more favorable, achieving maximum dose intensity is more likely. The simpler dosing schedule of lurbinectedin (1 vs 3 days) and lack of need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis lessens treatment burden.

EXPERT OPINION

Incorporation of lurbinectedin into therapeutic algorithms for relapsed SCLC has challenged long-established treatment paradigms. Initial evidence indicates that using lurbinectedin after failure of first-line platinum may prolong the platinum-free interval and reserve platinum for later use. Current evidence supports lurbinectedin as a second-line option in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC.

Camptothecin and Its Derivatives from Traditional Chinese Medicine in Combination with Anticancer Therapy Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives, irinotecan and topotecan, are integral components of cancer chemotherapy, often used in combination therapies. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of CPT-based combination treatments in cancer patients. Methods: We systematically searched the literature database using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist for articles published between 2000 and 2022. Published studies were retrieved through an electronic search on the Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. A total of 138 studies were downloaded and examined, and 71 eligible studies were selected for meta-analysis after excluding studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria. Results: Ultimately, a total of 71 studies were included in the analysis, comprising non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (COLRC), oesophageal/gastric cancer (O/GC), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). For NSCLC, the objective response rate (RR) was 31.8% (95% CI: 27.3-37.1%, p = 0.025), with irinotecan plus cisplatin showing significantly higher efficacy compared to other irinotecan-based combinations. In COLRC, irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab demonstrated superior efficacy with a RR of 44% (95% CI: 34-58, p < 0.001) and minimal haematological toxicity. In O/GC, irinotecan-based combinations showed an average RR of 43% (95% CI: 27-70, p < 0.001) and average overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 10.2 and 5.5 months, respectively. For SCLC, irinotecan-based combinations had a higher control response than topotecan-based ones, while the latter exhibited higher rates of stable and progressive disease. The overall RR for SCLC was 45% (95% CI: 34.3-60.2, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The existing evidence underscored the potential of CPT-based combination therapy in various cancers. Among the various combinations discussed in this analysis, irinotecan plus cisplatin demonstrated the highest objective RR in 12 trials focused on NSCLC. This study provides valuable insights into potential treatment strategies for various types of cancer, emphasising the importance of personalised and tailored approaches to maximise efficacy and minimise adverse effects.

Efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin in subsequent systemic therapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically analyze the efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin as a second-line or subsequent treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

Candidate studies were identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to 1 May 2024. Objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted, respectively. The efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin in ES-SCLC were analyzed by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six eligible prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 536 patients with ES-SCLC who received second-line or subsequent treatment. In pooled analysis, the ORR of lurbinectedin was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-41), DCR was 67% (95%CI 58-76), DOR was 5.33 months (95%CI 4.51-6.16), PFS was 3.38 months (95%CI 2.59-4.17), and OS was 7.49 months (95%CI 5.11-9.87). The incidence of AEs and severe adverse events (SAEs) was 92% (95%CI 78-100) and 37% (95%CI 19-57), respectively. The most common AEs were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, with incidences of 81% (68-91), 74% (57-88), 73% (35-98) and 57% (46-68), respectively.

CONCLUSION

As a promising alternative for second-line treatment for ES-SCLC, lurbinectedin has a certain level of efficacy and a favorable safety profile. The integration of lurbinectedin with other therapeutic modalities presents an emerging area warranting further investigation.

Real-world comparison of chemo-immunotherapy and chemotherapy alone in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma responsible for 200,000 deaths per year worldwide. Platinum-etoposide-based chemotherapy has been the standard of treatment for the past 40 years, with an overall survival of 10 months. Since 2019, the addition of immunotherapy (atezolizumab or durvalumab) to chemotherapy has become the standard of care for first-line treatment of extensive-stage SCLC following the demonstration of an improvement in overall survival in phase 3 studies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemo-immunotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in a "real-world" setting.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study including patients undergoing first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC between 2014 and 2022. We separated the study population into two arms (chemo-immunotherapy/chemotherapy). For each arm, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and serious side effects were collected. Associations between treatments and survival outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders. Consolidative palliative thoracic radiotherapy was introduced in the models as a time-dependent variable.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with a median age of 63 years were included. 65.2 % of patients were performance status 0 or 1. In univariate analysis, PFS and OS were not significantly different between the chemo-immunotherapy and chemotherapy alone groups (p = 0.70 and 0.24 respectively). In multivariate analysis, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy was not significantly associated with better PFS (HR 0.76, IC (0.49 - 1.19), p = 0.23), but it was significantly associated with better OS (HR 0.61, IC (0.38 - 0.98), p = 0.04). Consolidative palliative thoracic radiotherapy (time-dependent variable), when applied (almost only in the chemotherapy alone group), was significantly associated with better PFS and OS.

DISCUSSION

In this real-world study, chemo-immunotherapy was associated with slightly better OS compared to chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients in multivariate analysis, which is not explained by a benefit in PFS. However, consolidative palliative thoracic radiotherapy seems to be significantly associated with better OS and PFS, suggesting that we should also consider using it in patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy.

Camptothecin multifunctional nanoparticles effectively achieve a balance between the efficacy of breast cancer treatment and the preservation of intestinal homeostasis

Camptothecin (CPT) exhibits potent antitumor activity; however, its clinical application is limited by significant gastrointestinal adverse effects (GAEs). Although the severity of GAEs associated with CPT derivatives has decreased, the incidence rate of these adverse effects has remained high. CPT multifunctional nanoparticles (PCRHNs) have the potential to increase the efficacy of CPT while reducing side effects in major target organs; however, the impact of PCRHNs on the GAEs from CPT remains uncertain. Here, we investigated the therapeutic effects of PCRHNs and different doses of CPT and examined their impacts on the intestinal barrier and the intestinal microbiota. We found that the therapeutic efficacy of PCRHNs + Laser treatment was superior to that of high-dose CPT, and PCRHNs + Laser treatment also provided greater benefits by helping maintain intestinal barrier integrity, intestinal microbiota diversity, and intestinal microbiota abundance. In summary, compared to high-dose CPT treatment, PCRHNs + Laser treatment can effectively balance therapeutic effects and GAEs. A high dose of CPT promotes the enrichment of the pathogenic bacteria Escherichia-Shigella, which may be attributed to diarrhea caused by CPT, thus leading to a reduction in microbial burden; additionally, Escherichia-Shigella rapidly grows and occupies niches previously occupied by other bacteria that are lost due to diarrhea. PCRHNs + Laser treatment increased the abundance of Lactobacillus (probiotics), possibly due to the photothermal effect of the PCRHNs. This effect increased catalase activity, thus facilitating the conversion of hydrogen peroxide into oxygen within tumors and increasing oxygen levels in the body, which is conducive to the growth of facultative anaerobic bacteria.

Clinical Benefits of new Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer Over Two Decades: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. This study aimed to examine the clinical benefits of new systemic therapies derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2002 to 2023 based on the magnitude of clinical benefit scale developed by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO-MCBS).

METHODS

We searched PubMed for Phase 3 RCTs on systemic therapy for SCLC published between January 2002 and December 2023. Therapeutic benefit was graded from 5 to 1 according to the ESMO-MCBS framework, with a score of 4 or 5 representing a meaningful clinical benefit. The statistical power of the trial design was also assessed using ESMO-MCBS.

RESULTS

Sixty-four RCTs with 23 683 participants were eligible for inclusion. The number of RCTs related to molecular targeted therapy or immunotherapy has increased over the years. Among the 62 RCTs for which statistical power could be evaluated, 38 (61.3%) were designed to identify an effect size that would meet the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold and were less likely to investigate second- or subsequent-line treatment (15.8% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.004), have noninferiority design (0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.002) and set PFS (0% vs. 16.7%) or response rate (0% vs. 16.7%) as the only primary endpoint (p = 0.002). The ESMO-MCBS framework was applied in 29 RCTs reporting positive results, and only 8 (27.6%) met the threshold for a clinical benefit. The RCTs designed to detect differences that would meet the thresholds were more likely to demonstrate meaningful clinical benefit (87.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.099).

CONCLUSION

Most positive SCLC-RCTs did not meet the ESMO-MCBS threshold for meaningful clinical benefits. Strict power calculations should be adopted in the design of future RCTs.

Real-World Outcomes with Lurbinectedin in Second Line and Beyond for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in Korea

Purpose

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 10-15% of all lung cancers and is characterized by a high recurrence rate, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. Before the FDA approved lurbinectedin for SCLC that progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy in 2020, topotecan was the sole second-line option associated with hematological toxicities and modest efficacy. Lurbinectedin received conditional approval in Korea in September 2022 for metastatic SCLC progression, with the same indications. Real-world data on its efficacy remains scarce owing to its recent implementation.

Patients and Methods

Patients with metastatic SCLC who progressed on or after first-line therapy (n = 51) at Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, received lurbinectedin at 3.2 mg/m². Efficacy data, including tumor response, progression, survival, and demographics, were recorded.

Results

A total of fifty-one patients received lurbinectedin between April 2023 and March 2024, with thirty-four patients being eligible for the assessment. At diagnosis, approximately one-third of the patients were female, 3% had a poor performance status with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG PS ≥ 2), and the median age was 68. Most patients (80%) had extensive disease. Overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 20% and 47%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 3.3 months. Never smokers showed prolonged OS compared with current/former smokers (Smokers; 3.0 vs 7.3 months). Common adverse effects were nausea (53%), loss of appetite (24%), general weakness (18%), anemia (29%), neutropenia (12%), dizziness (6%), alopecia (6%), thrombocytopenia (3%), and pneumonia (3%). Overall, 24% of the patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), with the most common being anemia (9%) and neutropenia (9%).

Conclusion

Real-world data suggest that lurbinectedin is a viable option for patients with SCLC who have progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Strategies to Target Chemoradiotherapy Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a lethal form of lung cancer with few treatment options and a high rate of relapse. While SCLC is initially sensitive to first-line DNA-damaging chemo- and radiotherapy, relapse disease is almost universally therapy-resistant. As a result, there has been interest in understanding the mechanisms of therapeutic resistance in this disease. Conclusions: Progress has been made in elucidating these mechanisms, particularly as they relate to the DNA damage response and SCLC differentiation and transformation, leading to many clinical trials investigating new therapies and combinations. Yet there remain many gaps in our understanding, such as the effect of epigenetics or the tumor microenvironment on treatment response, and no single mechanism has been found to be ubiquitous, suggesting a significant heterogeneity in the mechanisms of acquired resistance. Nevertheless, the advancement of techniques in the laboratory and the clinic will improve our ability to study this disease, especially in patient populations, and identify methods to surmount therapeutic resistance.

Efficacy of carboplatin-etoposide rechallenge after first-line chemo-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC: an international multicentric analysis

Background and objectives

Second-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is primarily guided by the time elapsed since the last platinum dose. Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to topotecan if the platinum-free interval (PFI) is longer than 90 days and is considered the standard of care. However, these findings predate the chemo-immunotherapy era. This study investigates the effectiveness of the rechallenge strategy after chemo-immunotherapy in a real-world setting.

Design and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with the extensive stage (ES)-SCLC who received rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide after first-line chemoimmunotherapy between September 2020 and August 2023 in nine European centres. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed.

Results

A total of 93 patients were included. Sixty-six (71%) patients had a PFI between 3 and 6 months. Consolidation thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation had been administered in 31 (33.3%) patients and 20 (21.5%) patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 59.1%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-5.7) and median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.7-8.3). Notably, PFS and OS were not different according to PFI (3-6 m vs > 6 m).

Conclusion

Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide is a valid second-line option in patients with ES-SCLC whose disease progresses after first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Our analysis shows similar results to previous studies. Furthermore, outcomes were consistent across patients with different PFIs, confirming its efficacy in patients with a PFI longer than 3 months.

Second-line treatment outcomes after first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients: A large French multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (CT-IO) is the standard treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC). This study evaluates the effectiveness of second-line (2L) following CT-IO.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients from 10 centers who received a 2L after a first-line CT-IO were included. They were divided into 3 groups: platinum-based, lurbinectedin or others (topotecan, CAV, taxanes). We assessed overall survival (OS) and 2L progression-free survival (2L-PFS) according to treatment and platinum free-interval (PFI) < or ≥ 90 days.

RESULTS

Among 82 patients included, median age was 67.0 years, 29.3 % had a Performans Status ≥ 2, 36.6 % had brain progression, 69.5 % were considered "platine-sensitive" and 30.5 % "platine-resistant" (PFI ≥ or < 90 days, respectively). As 2L, 37/82 patients (45.1 %) received platinum-doublet, 21/82 (25.6 %) lurbinectedin and 24/82 (29.3 %) others. Patients with a PFI ≥ 90 days received mainly platinum-based rechallenge (34/57, 59.6 %). With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median OS was 5.0 months (95 %CI, 1.5-7.9) / 6.8 months (95 %CI, 5.5-8.7) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively (log rank p = 0.017). The median 2L-PFS was 1.9 months (95 %CI, 1.2-4.7) / 3.9 months (95 %CI, 2.9-6.0) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively. Median OS was 8.1 (95 %CI, 6.3-12.9) / 4.9 (95 %CI, 3.7-6.8) / 5.1 months (95 %CI, 2.5-7.8) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.017). Median 2L-PFS was 4.6 (95 %CI, 3.9-7.2) / 2.7 (95 %CI, 1.6-3.9) / 2.2 months (95 %CI, 1.5-4.1) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.025).

DISCUSSION

Platinum-based rechallenge after a first-line CT-IO showed promising results despite particularly unfavorable characteristics within our real-word population. Lurbinectedin when used after IO demonstrated as low efficacy as other platinum-free regimens.

Phase II study of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine for relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer

Background

Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) often respond to first-line chemoimmunotherapy. However, relapse is inevitable and is associated with a poor prognosis. Treatments for relapsed SCLC, such as lurbinectedin and topotecan, are limited by modest efficacy and significant hematologic adverse events, leaving a need for newer therapeutic agents or regimens. The combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is active and safe in other types of malignancies, such as pancreatic cancer.

Patients and methods

We conducted a phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients with confirmed complete or partial response. Secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Between October 2016 and May 2021, 32 patients were enrolled. Patients were followed for a median of 9.3 months (range 1.8-65.2). Median age was 65 years (range 48-81). Fifty percent of patients were female. Fifty-three percent of patients had platinum-resistant/refractory relapsed SCLC. The ORR was 28.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.5-100%). Median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI 2.4-3.6), and median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.2-12.4). Seven patients (21.9%) developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.

Conclusion

Our study showed that the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel led to encouraging outcomes in relapsed/refractory SCLC. Further studies are needed to compare this combination with other treatments used for relapsed SCLC, including lurbinectedin, temozolomide, and topotecan.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02769832?cond=NCT02769832&rank=1, identifier NCT02769832.

Big Decisions on Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Focus on Clinical Care Updates and Patient Perspectives

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an uncommon, aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, associated with tobacco use. It is a highly chemosensitive disease that initially responds quickly to systemic therapy, although patients with SCLC tend to develop relapse. Although the landscape of SCLC treatment has remained stagnant for many decades, the field has seen notable advances in the past few years, including the use of immunotherapy, the development of further lines of systemic therapy, the refinement of thoracic and intracranial radiotherapy, and-most recently-the promise of more targeted therapies. Patients with SCLC also must face unique psychosocial burdens in their experience with their cancer, distinct from patients with other lung cancer. In this article, we review the latest literature and future directions in the management and investigation of SCLC, as well as the critical decisions that providers and patients must navigate in the current landscape. We also present the perspectives of several patients with SCLC in conjunction with this summary, to spotlight their individual journeys in the context of this challenging disease.

The Evolving Scenario of ES-SCLC Management: From Biology to New Cancer Therapeutics

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma accounting for 15% of lung cancers with dismal survival outcomes. Minimal changes in therapy and prognosis have occurred in SCLC for the past four decades. Recent progress in the treatment of extensive-stage disease (ES-SCLC) has been marked by incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into platinum-based chemotherapy, leading to modest improvements. Moreover, few second-line-and-beyond treatment options are currently available. The main limitation for the molecular study of SCLC has been the scarcity of samples, because only very early diseases are treated with surgery and biopsies are not performed when the disease progresses. Despite all these difficulties, in recent years we have come to understand that SCLC is not a homogeneous disease. At the molecular level, in addition to the universal loss of retinoblastoma (RB) and TP53 genes, a recent large molecular study has identified other mutations that could serve as targets for therapy development or patient selection. In recent years, there has also been the identification of new genetic subtypes which have shown us how intertumor heterogeneity exists. Moreover, SCLC can also develop intratumoral heterogeneity linked mainly to the concept of cellular plasticity, mostly due to the development of resistance to therapies. The aim of this review is to quickly present the current standard of care of ES-SCLC, to focus on the molecular landscapes and subtypes of SCLC, subsequently present the most promising therapeutic strategies under investigation, and finally recap the future directions of ongoing clinical trials for this aggressive disease which still remains a challenge.

Continuous immunotherapy beyond progression in clinical practice for small cell lung cancer

In non-small-cell lung cancer, continuous immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) beyond progression are often used in clinical practice. On the other hand, there is almost no data on whether the concept of continuous ICIs beyond progression can be adopted in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We describe the effectiveness of continuous ICIs beyond progression in SCLC. Medical courses of SCLC patients treated with chemo-immunotherapy were retrospectively reviewed at our hospital. The study included 36 patients with a median age of 73 years (range 46-83 years) who introduced chemo-immunotherapy between September 2019 and December 2022. Atezolizumab and durvalumab in combination with platinum plus etoposide were administered in 24 and 12 patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 67% and the disease control rate was 86%. The median progression-free survival and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 5.1 and 10.3 months, respectively. The median cycle of ICIs was 5 (range 1-42). The median overall survival was 13.6 months. ICIs were administered beyond progression in 14 (39%) patients: five were treated again with chemo-immunotherapy and local ablative radiotherapy, four with local ablative radiotherapy and continuous ICIs, three with chemo-immunotherapy, and two with continuous ICIs alone. TTF exceeded 12 months in 12 (86%) of the 14 cases, six of which were still on ICIs. Adverse events ≥grade 3 were observed in 21 (58%) patients. A notable TTF suggested a benefit of continuous ICIs beyond progression. The concept could be suitably adopted and provide a favorable prognosis in selected cases of SCLC that were previously regarded as an aggressive malignancy.

Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) presents as a highly chemosensitive malignancy but acquires cross-resistance after relapse. This transformation is nearly inevitable in patients but has been difficult to capture in laboratory models. Here, we present a preclinical system that recapitulates acquired cross-resistance, developed from 51 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Each model was tested in vivo against three clinical regimens: cisplatin plus etoposide, olaparib plus temozolomide, and topotecan. These drug-response profiles captured hallmark clinical features of SCLC, such as the emergence of treatment-refractory disease after early relapse. For one patient, serial PDX models revealed that cross-resistance was acquired through MYC amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA). Genomic and transcriptional profiles of the full PDX panel revealed that MYC paralog amplifications on ecDNAs were recurrent in relapsed cross-resistant SCLC, and this was corroborated in tumor biopsies from relapsed patients. We conclude that ecDNAs with MYC paralogs are recurrent drivers of cross-resistance in SCLC.

SIGNIFICANCE

SCLC is initially chemosensitive, but acquired cross-resistance renders this disease refractory to further treatment and ultimately fatal. The genomic drivers of this transformation are unknown. We use a population of PDX models to discover that amplifications of MYC paralogs on ecDNA are recurrent drivers of acquired cross-resistance in SCLC. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 695.

Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary LCNEC. We retrospectively reviewed patients with pulmonary LCNEC or possible LCNEC (pLCNEC) who received platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Among these patients, we evaluated the efficacy of second-line treatment by comparing patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC group). Of the 61 patients with LCNEC or pLCNEC (LCNEC group) who received first-line chemotherapy, 39 patients were treated with second-line chemotherapy. Among the 39 patients, 61.5% received amrubicin monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the LCNEC groups were 3.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. No significant differences in the PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.924, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647-1.320; P = 0.664) and OS (HR: 0.926; 95% CI 0.648-1.321; P = 0.670) were observed between the LCNEC and SCLC groups. In patients treated with amrubicin, the PFS (P = 0.964) and OS (P = 0.544) were not different between both the groups. Second-line chemotherapy, including amrubicin, may be considered as a treatment option for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Considerations for selecting second-line treatment in patients with progressive small cell lung cancer and the use of Lurbinectedin in this setting

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by high initial responses to platinum-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, most patients quickly relapse and require subsequent treatment. Second-line treatment options in SCLC remain limited, and treatment algorithms are not completely consistent across the available guidelines in this setting. This review highlights key considerations regarding selection of second-line treatment for patients with relapsed SCLC. In particular, the role of lurbinectedin, which was first approved in 2020, representing the first significant addition to treatment algorithms in this setting for decades, is summarized. Future directions, including the identification of SCLC subtypes and the need for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and targeted therapy, are also discussed.

Reconsidering the Cutoff Value for Sensitive and Refractory Relapses in Extensive-Stage SCLC in the Era of Immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, relapsed SCLC has been classified as "sensitive" or "refractory" on the basis of cutoff values (60 or 90 d) for the duration between the last chemotherapy and disease progression. Nevertheless, these cutoff values are not derived from rigorous analytical methods, and their applicability to contemporary treatments remains uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on patients with extensive-stage SCLC who underwent second-line therapy after platinum-doublet chemotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance before (pre-ICI cohort) and after (post-ICI cohort) approval of combination immunotherapy. We selected the optimal platinum-free interval cutoff value with the lowest two-sided p value in the multivariable Cox regression model for second-line overall survival. The internal validity of the chosen cutoff value was assessed using twofold cross-validation.

RESULTS

There were 235 and 98 patients in the pre-ICI and post-ICI cohorts, respectively. In the pre-ICI cohort, the optimal cutoff was 59 days (p = 0.0001); the hazard ratio calculated using twofold cross-validation was 1.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.82]). In the post-ICI cohort, although the 60- and 90-day cutoff values could predict prognosis (60 d; p = 0.002, 90 d; p = 0.005), the optimal cutoff value was 75 days (p = 0.0002), which resulted in a median second-line overall survival of 15.9 and 5.0 months for patients with sensitive and refractory relapse, respectively (hazard ratio = 2.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.56-4.93).

CONCLUSIONS

We clarified the previously ambiguous cutoff values for classifying relapsed SCLC and revealed that the 75-day cutoff most accurately predicts subsequent prognosis than the traditional cutoffs in the post-ICI era.

Tissue and circulating biomarkers of benefit to immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients

Extensive stage-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) is an aggressive cancer with dismal prognosis. The addition of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to platinum-based chemotherapy have been consistently demonstrated to improve outcomes and survival, becoming the new standard in first - line treatment of ES-SCLC patients. However, despite positive results reported in the pivotal trials, longer benefit appears evident only for a selected group of patients. Several predictive biomarkers have been studied so far but the prospective identification of patients more likely to experience better outcome seems to be challenging in SCLC. Indeed, classical immune predictive biomarkers as PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden (TMB) seem not to correlate with outcomes. Recently, a new molecular classification of SCLC based on differential expression of genes associated with specific clinical behaviors and therapeutic vulnerability have been presented suggesting a new field to be investigated. Despite the achievements, these studies focused mainly on inter-tumoral heterogeneity, limiting the exploration of intra-tumoral heterogeneity and cell to cell interactions. New analysis methods are ongoing in order to explore subtypes plasticity. Analysis on single biopsies cannot catch the whole genomic profile and dynamic change of disease over time and during treatment. Moreover, the availability of tissue for translational research is limited due to the low proportion of patients undergoing surgery. In this context, liquid biopsy is a promising tool to detect reliable predictive biomarkers. Here, we reviewed the current available data on predictive role of tissue and liquid biomarkers in ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs. We assessed latest results in terms of predictive and prognostic value of gene expression profiling in SCLC. Finally, we explored the role of liquid biopsy as a tool to monitor SCLC patients over time.

Second-Line Treatment Options for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Light at the End of the Tunnel

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a subtype of lung tumor characterized by rapid growth and early metastatic dissemination. It represents approximately 15% of all diagnosed lung cancers, with an annual incidence of over 200,000 cases worldwide. At the time of initial diagnosis, approximately 75-80% of patients already have extrathoracic spread. Almost all patients with SCLC also relapse after achieving a complete response with first-line treatment. Outcomes achievable in second-line treatment are related to the length of time between completion of first-line therapy and disease progression. While first-line chemo-immunotherapy remains the standard of care for initial management, the role of second-line treatment strategies in SCLC has been a topic of significant research and discussion. Second-line treatment options are limited and the results are still disappointing. Several molecules are currently being studied in lines following the first, using immunological targets and cell cycle checkpoints. Among these, particular interest has been placed on anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death-1 protein) and anti-PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1) monoclonal antibodies, and DLL3 (Delta-like ligand 3), which are being evaluated alone or in combination. Tarlatamab is a novel promising therapeutic antibody currently under investigation for its potential use in previously treated SCLC patients. This mini-review will explore the current state of second-line treatment options for SCLC, their clinical efficacy, and future directions.

Benefits and risks of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for recurrent small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) has revolutionized the progress of solid tumors. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the use of checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent small-cell lung cancer and achieving specific results. Although studies have been conducted to systematically review this issue, we conducted this single-arm meta-analysis in light of the emergence of several new clinical studies. In total, 854 individuals from 11 clinical investigations were enrolled in this single-arm meta-analysis. Median progression-free survival, median overall survival, and objective response rate were 1.65 months, 6.83 months, and 20.5%, respectively, according to pooled analyses. The best treatment regimen in the subgroup analysis was a dual checkpoint inhibitor combined with other treatments, and the drug that worked well for treatment was pembrolizumab. The benefit of programmed death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors alone is limited, and their combination with other therapies is a promising treatment option. Among PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, pembrolizumab is the recommended drug.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Treatment Options for Advanced Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

As monotherapy such as topotecan has reached a plateau of effectiveness, new second-line treatments based on experience have been used in clinical application. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different second-line treatments for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

A total of 380 patients with advanced SCLC were screened selectively in the retrospective study. Adverse events and patient responses were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors v1.1. The progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method or Cox survival regression model and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

In the platinum-resistant group, disease control rate (DCR) and median PFS (mPFS) were prolonged in the combination group versus single-agent group (DCR: 49.24% vs 24.39%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.73 vs 1.90 months, P < .001). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups (P = .683). The mPFS did not differ among single-agent groups (P = .380). No significant difference was observed in mPFS of different combination therapy groups (P = .170). In terms of platinum-based chemotherapy, the DCR and mPFS were prolonged in irinotecan-platinum group versus taxol-platinum group (DCR: 56.14% vs 9.09%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.87 vs 1.93 months, P = .012). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups (P = .614). The mPFS was prolonged in the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy group versus single-agent chemotherapy group (P = .003). In the platinum-sensitive group, the mPFS did not differ between the combination group and single-agent group (P = .200). The mPFS did not differ among different single-agent groups (P = .260) or combination groups (P = .150). There was no difference in mPFS among different platinum-based chemotherapy groups (P = .830).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with platinum-resistant SCLC, combination therapy has shown better efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile than monotherapy. Among combination therapies, irinotecan-platinum has shown better efficacy than taxol-platinum. For patients with platinum-sensitive SCLC, the efficacy of different single-agent or combination therapies was similar.

Discovery of plant-derived anti-tumor natural products: Potential leads for anti-tumor drug discovery

Natural products represent a paramount source of novel drugs. Numerous plant-derived natural products have demonstrated potent anti-tumor properties, thereby garnering considerable interest in their potential as anti-tumor drugs. This review compiles an overview of 242 recently discovered natural products, spanning the period from 2018 to the present. These natural products, which include 69 terpenoids, 42 alkaloids, 39 flavonoids, 21 steroids, 14 phenylpropanoids, 5 quinolines and 52 other compounds, are characterized by their respective chemical structures, anti-tumor activities, and mechanisms of action. By providing an essential reference and fresh insights, this review aims to support and inspire researchers engaged in the fields of natural products and anti-tumor drug discovery.

Treating patients with platinum-sensitive extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in a real-world setting

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an aggressive disease with poor 5-year survival. The first-line standard-of-care for ES-SCLC is platinum plus etoposide, along with 1 of the immune checkpoint inhibitors atezolizumab or durvalumab. Although SCLC first-line therapy often leads to rapid responses, treatment becomes more challenging at progression, particularly for those with a chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI) of ≤6 months. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for SCLC no longer specify treatment recommendations in this setting, but options approved by the US Food and Drug Administration include topotecan and lurbinectedin. Participation in a clinical trial is recommended as an option regardless of CTFI. Other NCCN-recommended regimens are paclitaxel, irinotecan, temozolomide, and cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine, among others. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are options in those not previously treated with a checkpoint inhibitor. For patients with platinum-sensitive SCLC (CTFI >6 months), preferred treatment per the NCCN Guidelines® for SCLC is retreatment with platinum and etoposide, although the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is discouraged if there is progression on a drug in this class. Further research on immunotherapies and combination regimens is ongoing, and continuing work on the subcharacterization of SCLC may lead to better precision of therapies that promote more durable responses in individual patients with ES-SCLC.

Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Real-World Outcomes With Lurbinectedin in Second-Line Setting and Beyond for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lurbinectedin has emerged as a potential treatment option for relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). While clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, real-world data are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lurbinectedin in a real-world setting, focusing on its use as a second-line agent and beyond in SCLC patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 patients who received lurbinectedin between June 2020 and June 2022 within the Mayo Clinic Health System. Of these, 50 patients received lurbinectedin as a second-line agent, and 14 patients received it as a third-line or later agent. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Lurbinectedin was generally well tolerated in this real-world cohort, with a median OS of 5.1 months in the second-line cohort and 5.6 months in the third-line or later cohort. Median PFS was 2.1 months in the second-line cohort and 3.4 months in the third-line or later cohort. Adverse events were manageable, with the most common being neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths or grade 5 toxicities were reported.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study provides valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of lurbinectedin in relapsed SCLC. Lurbinectedin demonstrated modest efficacy and a comparable safety profile to that observed in clinical trials. However, outcomes for relapsed SCLC remain suboptimal, particularly for patients with a shorter chemotherapy-free interval and central nervous system metastases.

Safety and efficacy of amrubicin with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim as second-line chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Amrubicin (AMR) regimens have shown efficacy as second-line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, adverse events such as febrile neutropenia (FN) sometimes preclude their use. Further, the safety and efficacy of AMR with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim (P-PEG) have not been sufficiently evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of AMR with or without P-PEG as second-line chemotherapy for SCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with SCLC who received AMR as second-line chemotherapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center, between December 2014 and November 2021. Based on presence/absence of P-PEG in their regimen, patients (n = 60) were divided into P-PEG (n = 21) and non-P-PEG groups, and their clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median of AMR treatment cycles was five (range: 1-39 cycles) in P-PEG group and four (range: 1-15 cycles) in non-P-PEG group. The incidence of FN (4.8% vs. 30.8%; p = 0.02) and AMR dose reduction because of adverse events (4.8% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.08) were lower in the P-PEG group than in the non-P-PEG group. The objective response rates were 52.4% and 30.8%, and median progression-free and overall survival were 4.7 and 3.0 months, and 9.6 and 6.8 months, in the P-PEG and non-P-PEG groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AMR with P-PEG as second-line chemotherapy for SCLC reduced the incidence of FN at a maintained AMR dose intensity and was associated with favorable tumor responses and survival outcomes. P-PEG should be considered for patients treated with AMR for SCLC including refractory relapsed SCLC.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the real-world evidence ESME cohort before the era of immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive entity of lung cancer with tendency toward early recurrence after first-line treatment. As per recently updated European Society for Medical Oncology recommendations, first-line treatment with up to 4 cycles of platinum-etoposide combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs)-targeting PD-L1, is now the standard of care. The purpose of the current analysis is to identify current patient profiles and treatment strategies in real life clinical practice, and report outcomes in Extensive Stage (ES)-SCLC.

METHODS

Non-interventional, retrospective, multicentre, comparative study was carried out to describe the outcome of ES-SCLC patients included in the Epidémiologie Stratégie Médico-Economique (ESME) data platform for advanced and metastatic lung cancer. Patients were selected from 34 health care facilities between January 2015 and December 2017, before the era of immunotherapy.

RESULTS

1315 patients were identified, including 64% male and 78% under 70 year-old; 24% had at least 3 metastatic sites, mainly liver metastases (43%), bone metastases (36%), brain metastases (32%). 49% received only one line of systemic treatment; 30% and 21% received 2 and 3 lines or more, respectively. Carboplatin was more frequently used than cisplatin (71% and 29%, respectively). Prophylactic cranial irradiation was infrequent (4% of patients), but 16% of patients received thoracic radiation therapy, mainly after the completion of first-line chemotherapy (72% of patients); such strategies were more frequently applied in cisplatin/etoposide than carboplatin/etoposide patients (p = 0.006 and p = 0.015, respectively). After a median follow-up time of 21.8 (95% CI: 20.9-23.3) months, median real-world Progression-Free Survival (rw-PFS) was 6.2 (95% CI: 5.7; 6.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 5.8; 6.3) months for cisplatin/etoposide and carboplatin/etoposide doublet regimens, respectively; 24-month rwPFS and Overall Survival were 3.2% (95% CI: 2.3; 4;2) and 22.2% (95% CI: 19.4; 25.1) in the whole population, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data provide with landmark reference findings on ES-SCLC before the immunotherapy era, and cover many aspects of the treatment strategy, while highlighting on the role of radiotherapy, subsequent lines of therapy, and the outcomes of patients. Generation of real-world data focusing on patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is under way.

Long-term effectiveness and treatment sequences in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer receiving atezolizumab plus chemotherapy: Results of the IFCT-1905 CLINATEZO real-world study

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a tendency towards recurrence and limited survival. Standard-of-care in 1st-line is platinum-etoposide chemotherapy plus atezolizumab or durvalumab,based on landmarkclinical trials.

METHODS

IFCT-1905 CLINATEZO is a nationwide, non-interventional, retrospectivestudy of patients with extensive-SCLC receivingatezolizumab plus chemotherapy as part of French Early Access Program. Objectives were to analyse effectiveness,safetyand subsequent treatments.

RESULTS

The population analyzed included 518 patients who received atezolizumabin 65 participating centers. There were 66.2% male,mean age was 65.7 years; 89.1% had a performance status (PS) 0/1 and 26.6% brain metastases. Almost all(95.9%) were smokers. Fifty-five (10.6%) received at least 1 previous treatment. Median number of atezolizumab injections was 7.0 (range [1.0-48.0]) for a median duration of 4.9 months (95% CI 4.5-5.1). Atezolizumab was continued beyond progression in 122 patients (23.6%) for a median duration of 1.9 months (95% CI: [1.4-2.3]). Best objective response was complete and partialin 19 (3.9%) and 378 (77.1%)patients. Stable diseasewas observed in 50 patients (10.2%). Median follow-up was30.8 months (95% CI: [29.9-31.5]). Median overall survival (OS), 12-, 24-month OS rates were 11.3 months (95% CI: [10.1-12.4]), 46.7% (95% CI [42.3-50.9]) and 21.2% (95% CI [17.7-24.8]). Median real-world progression-free survival, 6-, 12-month rates were 5.2 months (95% CI [5.0-5.4]), 37.5% (95% CI [33.3-41.7]) and 15.2% (95% CI [12.2-18.6]). For patients with PS 0/1, median OS was 12.2 months (95% CI [11.0-13.5]). For patients with previous treatment, median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI [10.1-21.5]). Three-hundred-and-twenty-six patients(66.4%) received subsequent treatment and27 (5.2%) were still underatezolizumabat date of last news.

CONCLUSIONS

IFCT-1905 CLINATEZO shows reproductibility, in real-life,ofIMpower-133survival outcomes, possibly attributed to selection of patients fit for this regimen, adoption of pragmatic approaches,including concurrent radiotherapy and treatment beyond progression.

Development and Validation of txSim: A Model of Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment in Australia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Since 2016, new therapies have transformed the standard of care for lung cancer, creating a need for up-to-date evidence for health economic modelling. We developed a discrete event simulation of advanced lung cancer treatment to provide estimates of survival outcomes and healthcare costs in the Australian setting that can be updated as new therapies are introduced.

METHODS

Treatment for advanced lung cancer was modelled under a clinician-specified treatment algorithm for Australia in 2022. Prevalence of lung cancer subpopulations was extracted from cBioPortal and the Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study, a large prospective cohort linked to cancer registrations. All costs were from the health system perspective for the year 2020. Pharmaceutical and molecular diagnostic costs were obtained from public reimbursement fees, while other healthcare costs were obtained from health system costs in the 45 and Up Study. Treatment efficacy was obtained from clinical trials and observational study data. Costs and survival were modelled over a 10-year horizon. Uncertainty intervals were generated with probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Overall survival predictions were validated against real-world studies.

RESULTS

Under the 2022 treatment algorithm, estimated mean survival and costs for advanced lung cancer 10 years post-diagnosis were 16.4 months (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 14.7-18.1) and AU$116,069 (95% UI: $107,378-$124,933). Survival and costs were higher assuming optimal treatment utilisation rates (20.5 months, 95% UI: 19.1-22.5; $154,299, 95% UI: $146,499-$161,591). The model performed well in validation, with good agreement between predicted and observed survival in real-world studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival improvements for advanced lung cancer have been accompanied by growing treatment costs. The estimates reported here can be used for budget planning and economic evaluations of interventions across the spectrum of cancer control.

Selection of Chemotherapy in Advanced Poorly Differentiated Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Extra-pulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma is rare, and evidence for treatment has been limited. In this article, the evidence behind the cytotoxic chemotherapy choices used for metastatic or unresectable EP-PD-NEC is reviewed. In the first-line setting, etoposide and platinum chemotherapy or irinotecan and platinum have been demonstrated to be equivalent in a large phase III trial. Questions remain regarding the optimal number of cycles, mode of delivery, and the precise definition of platinum resistance in this setting. In the second-line setting, FOLFIRI has emerged as an option, with randomized phase 2 trials demonstrating modest, but significant, response rates. Beyond this, data are extremely limited, and several regimens have been used. Heterogeneity in biological behaviour is a major barrier to optimal EP-PD-NEC management. Available data support the potential role of the Ki-67 index as a predictive biomarker for chemotherapy response. A more personalised approach to management in future studies will be essential, and comprehensive multi-omic approaches are required to understand tumour somatic genetic changes in relation to their effects on the surrounding microenvironment.

Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Prospects

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by aggressive disease progression and tendency to metastasize. Although chemotherapy for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) has remained unchanged for decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the primary therapy for ES-SCLC. However, the number of patients benefiting from immunotherapy is limited, and the treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory. In addition, predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy have not yet been identified. Recent reports have shed light on the genomics of SCLC and defined four distinct molecular subtypes based on transcription factor expression. This may increase our understanding of the biology of SCLC and identify novel therapeutic targets and drugs. In this article, we review the current standard management of ES-SCLC and present the most recent reports to further our understanding of molecular classification, predictive biomarkers, and prospective therapies, including immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy.

Canadian Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive, neuroendocrine tumour with high relapse rates, and significant morbidity and mortality. Apart from advances in radiation therapy, progress in the systemic treatment of SCLC had been stagnant for over three decades despite multiple attempts to develop alternative therapeutic options that could improve responses and survival. Recent promising developments in first-line and subsequent therapeutic approaches prompted a Canadian Expert Panel to convene to review evidence, discuss practice patterns, and reach a consensus on the treatment of extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The literature search included guidelines, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials. Regular meetings were held from September 2022 to March 2023 to discuss the available evidence to propose and agree upon specific recommendations. The panel addressed biomarkers and histological features that distinguish SCLC from non-SCLC and other neuroendocrine tumours. Evidence for initial and subsequent systemic therapies was reviewed with consideration for patient performance status, comorbidities, and the involvement and function of other organs. The resulting consensus recommendations herein will help clarify evidence-based management of ES-SCLC in routine practice, help clinician decision-making, and facilitate the best patient outcomes.

Acquired Cross-resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC paralogs

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) presents as a highly chemosensitive malignancy but acquires cross-resistance after relapse. This transformation is nearly inevitable in patients but has been difficult to capture in laboratory models. Here we present a pre-clinical system that recapitulates acquired cross-resistance in SCLC, developed from 51 patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). Each model was tested for in vivo sensitivity to three clinical regimens: cisplatin plus etoposide, olaparib plus temozolomide, and topotecan. These functional profiles captured hallmark clinical features, such as the emergence of treatment-refractory disease after early relapse. Serially derived PDX models from the same patient revealed that cross-resistance was acquired through a MYC amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA). Genomic and transcriptional profiles of the full PDX panel revealed that this was not unique to one patient, as MYC paralog amplifications on ecDNAs were recurrent among cross-resistant models derived from patients after relapse. We conclude that ecDNAs with MYC paralogs are recurrent drivers of cross-resistance in SCLC.

SIGNIFICANCE

SCLC is initially chemosensitive, but acquired cross-resistance renders this disease refractory to further treatment and ultimately fatal. The genomic drivers of this transformation are unknown. We use a population of PDX models to discover that amplifications of MYC paralogs on ecDNA are recurrent drivers of acquired cross-resistance in SCLC.

FOLFIRI in advanced platinum-resistant/refractory small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of lung cancer and is associated with poor prognosis. In platinum-refractory or -resistant SCLC patients, few treatment options are available. Topotecan is one of the standards of care for these patients, however, due to its high toxicity, several different approaches are employed. FOLFIRI (folinate, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) is a chemotherapy regimen used in digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma, which shares pathological similarities with SCLC. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory SCLC.

METHODS

Medical records from all consecutive SCLC patients treated with FOLFIRI in a French University Hospital from 2013 to 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 or EORTC criteria (ORR); secondary endpoints included duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety profile.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with metastatic platinum-resistant (n = 14) or -refractory (n = 20) SCLC were included. Twenty-eight were evaluable for response, with a partial response observed in 5 patients for an overall ORR in the evaluable population of 17.9% (5/28) and 14.7% (5/34) in the overall population. The disease control rate was 50% (14/28) in the evaluable population. The median PFS and OS were 2.8 months (95%CI, 2.0-5.2 months) and 5.3 months (95%CI, 3.5-8.9 months), respectively. All patients were included in the safety analysis. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 13 (38.2%) patients. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were asthenia, neutropenia, thrombopenia and diarrhea. There was no adverse event leading to discontinuation or death.

CONCLUSION

FOLFIRI showed some activity for platinum-resistant/refractory SCLC in terms of overall response and had an acceptable safety profile. However, caution is needed in interpreting this result. FOLFIRI could represent a potential new treatment for platinum-resistant/refractory SCLC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the benefits of this chemotherapy regimen.HIGHLIGHTSFOLFIRI showed some activity for platinum-resistant/refractory SCLC in terms of overall response.FOLFIRI was well-tolerated in platinum resistant/refractory SLCL patients.FOLFIRI could represent a potential new treatment for SCLC, prospective studies are needed.

Post-progression treatment in cancer randomized trials: a cross-sectional study of trials leading to FDA approval and published trials between 2018 and 2020

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal treatment upon progression may affect overall survival (OS) results in oncology randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aim to assess the proportion of trials reporting post-progression treatment.

METHODS

This cross-sectional analysis included two concurrent analyses. The first one examined all published RCTs of anti-cancer drugs in six high impact medical/oncology journals between January 2018 and December 2020. The second studied all US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved anti-cancer drugs during the same period. Included trials needed to study an anti-cancer drug in the advanced or metastatic setting. Data abstracted included the tumor type, characteristics of trials, and reporting and assessment of post-progression treatment.

RESULTS

There were 275 published trials and 77 US FDA registration trials meeting inclusion criteria. Assessable post-progression data were reported in 100/275 publications (36.4%) and 37/77 approvals (48.1%). Treatment was considered substandard in 55 publications (n = 55/100, 55.0%) and 28 approvals (n = 28/37, 75.7%). Among trials with assessable post-progression data and positive OS results, a subgroup analysis identified substandard post-progression treatment in 29 publications (n = 29/42, 69.0%) and 20 approvals (n = 20/26, 76.9%). Overall, 16.4% of publications (45/275) and 11.7% of registration trials (9/77) had available post-progression data assessed as appropriate.

CONCLUSION

We found that most anti-cancer RCTs do not report assessable post-progression treatment. When reported, post-progression treatment was substandard in most trials. In trials reporting positive OS results and with assessable post-progression data, the proportion of trials with subpar post-progression treatment was even higher. Discrepancies between post-progression therapy in trials and the standard of care can limit RCT results' applicability. Regulatory rules should enforce higher requirements regarding post-progression treatment access and reporting.

Targeted Therapies in Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Old Failures to Novel Therapeutic Strategies

The clinical management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatment remains a major challenge for thoracic oncologists, with very few therapeutic advances significantly impacting patients' survival. The recent introduction of immunotherapy in the clinical setting produced a marginal benefit for a limited subset of metastatic patients, while the therapeutic scenario for relapsing extended-disease small cell lung cancers (ED-SCLCs) remains almost deserted. Recent efforts clarified the molecular features of this disease, leading to the identification of key signalling pathways which may serve as potential targets for clinical use. Despite the large number of molecules tested and the numerous therapeutic failures, some targeted therapies have recently shown interesting preliminary results. In this review, we describe the main molecular pathways involved in SCLC development/progression and provide an updated summary of the targeted therapies currently under investigation in SCLC patients.

Novel therapeutic strategies for recurrent SCLC

Therapeutic options for patients with relapsed SCLC are limited, and the prognosis in this setting remains poor. While clinical outcomes for frontline treatment have modestly improved with the introduction of immunotherapy, treatment in the second-line setting persists almost unchanged. In this review, current treatment options and recent advances in molecular biology are described. Emerging therapeutic options in this setting and potential strategies to improve clinical outcomes of these patients are also addressed.