Adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade revisited

Could a Risk-adapted Approach Support Shared Decision-making Regarding Eligibility for Adjuvant Pembrolizumab for Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma at High Risk of Recurrence? A Multicentre Cohort Study

The KEYNOTE-564 randomised controlled trial showed a disease-free survival benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab (aPZB) in comparison to placebo for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) at high risk of recurrence. Despite its recommendation by the European Association of Urology guidelines, the ultimate value of aPZB has recently been questioned. Arguably, patients who might benefit the most from aPZB are those whose probability of RCC recurrence outweighs their probability of dying from other causes over a reasonable timeframe after surgery. To assess the potential impact of this hypothesis on "eligibility" for aPZB, we queried our prospectively collected multi-institutional database for consecutive patients undergoing surgery for nonmetastatic renal masses (cT1-4 N0-1 M0) between 2015 and 2021 to identify ccRCC cases meeting the KEYNOTE-564 criteria. We stratified the patients using the risk-adapted model proposed by Stewart-Merrill et al (whereby stopping follow-up is warranted when the estimated risk of other-cause mortality [OCM] outweighs the estimated risk of RCC recurrence). Then we explored the proportion of patients whose follow-up could theoretically be stopped at 2, 5, 10, or 20 yr, for whom "eligibility" for aPZB might be more controversial. Overall, 1745 patients with ccRCC were included, of whom 419 (24%) met the KEYNOTE-564 criteria. The proportion of patients "not eligible" for aPZB because of higher probability of OCM than of RCC recurrence would have been 81%, 66%, 43%, and 29% at "recommended" follow-up of ≤2.0, ≤5, ≤10, and ≤20 yr, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study providing insights to support shared decision-making regarding eligibility for aPZB for patients with nonmetastatic ccRCC with a focus on patient-related factors beyond tumour-driven prognostic scores. PATIENT SUMMARY: An immunotherapy drug call pembrolizumab given after surgery for nonmetastatic kidney cancer may benefit some patients who have a high risk of disease recurrence, but it can have immune-related side effects. We found that comparing the risk of death from other causes and the risk of cancer recurrence could help in reducing overtreatment of patients who might not benefit from this drug.

Real-world health-related quality of life outcomes for patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma treated with adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy

BACKGROUND

While adjuvant therapy with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD1) for patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma has been shown to improve recurrence-free survival, the overall survival benefit remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma METHODS: Data was used from two melanoma registries in Australia and the Netherlands. Patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma treated with adjuvant anti-PD1 who completed a baseline and at least one post-baseline HRQOL assessment were included. HRQOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Established thresholds were used for interpreting changes in QLQ-C30 scores.

RESULTS

92 patients were included. Mean symptom and functioning scores improved or remained stable at 12 months compared to baseline. However, a substantial proportion of patients experienced a clinically significant decline in role (39%, μ = -50.8), social (41%, μ = -32.7), or emotional (50%, μ = -25.1) functioning at 12 months compared to baseline. Younger patients were more likely to experience clinically significant deteriorations in role (OR=1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13, p < 0.01) and social (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.013) functioning.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma who received adjuvant anti-PD1 experienced clinically significant declines in role, social and emotional functioning at 12 months compared to baseline. This highlights the HRQOL issues that may arise during adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy which may require supportive care intervention.