Redefining Clostridioides difficile infection antibiotic response and clinical outcomes

A Retrospective Budget Impact Analysis of Fidaxomicin Treatment for Clostridioides difficile Infections (CDI) in Germany

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. Research suggests that treating C. difficile infections (CDI) with fidaxomicin (FDX) is more effective than vancomycin (VAN), with potential cost savings. The objective was to calculate the budget impact of FDX treatment compared to VAN from a German payer perspective.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The analysis used real-world data of patients discharged from University Hospital Cologne between Jan-01-2018 and Dec-31-2019. We identified recurrent and non-recurrent CDI cases and calculated direct treatment costs based on G-DRG flat rates. To calculate average costs per treatment and the budget impact, recurrence probabilities for VAN and FDX were taken from published evidence (28-day and 90-day scenarios).

RESULTS

Totally, 475 cases were analyzed, thereof 421 non-recurrent, causing mean costs of €32,901 per case (95% CI: 27.752-38.050). Thirty-two patients experienced a recurrence within 28 days, yielding mean costs of €10,952 (95% CI: 5.627-16.277) for their additional hospital stay. The resulting budget impact was €1,303 (95% CI: 670 - 1.937) in favor of FDX, ranging from €148.34 to €2,190.30 in scenario analyses.

CONCLUSION

The analysis indicates FDX treatment can lead to cost savings compared to VAN. Future research should focus on specific patient groups, such as refractory CDI patients.

Update on microbiota-derived therapies for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections

BACKGROUND

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the standard treatment for patients with multiple recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Recently, new commercially developed human microbiota-derived medicinal products have been evaluated and Food and Drug Administration-approved with considerable differences in terms of composition, administration, and targeted populations.

OBJECTIVES

To review available data on the different microbiota-derived treatments at the stage of advanced clinical evaluation and research in rCDI in comparison with FMT.

SOURCES

Phase II or III trials evaluating a microbiota-derived medicinal product to prevent rCDI.

CONTENT

Two commercial microbiota-derived medicinal products are approved by the Food and Drug Administration: Rebyota (RBX2660 Ferring Pharmaceuticals, marketed in the United States) and VOWST (SER-109 -Seres Therapeutics, marketed in the United States), whereas VE303 (Vedanta Biosciences Inc) will be studied in phase III trial. RBX2660 and SER-109 are based on the processing of stools from healthy donors, whereas VE303 consists of a defined bacterial consortium originating from human stools and produced from clonal cell banks. All have proven efficacy to prevent rCDI compared with placebo in patients considered at high risk of recurrence. However, the heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria, and the time between each episode and CDI diagnostics makes direct comparison between trials difficult. The differences regarding the risk of recurrence between the treatment and placebo arms were lower than previously described for FMT (FMT: Δ = 50.5%; RBX2660-phase III: Δ = 13.1%; SER-109-phase III: Δ = 28%; high-dose VE303-phase-II: Δ = 31.7%). All treatments presented a good overall safety profile with mainly mild gastrointestinal symptoms.

IMPLICATIONS

Stool-derived products and bacterial consortia need to be clearly distinguished in terms of product characterization and their associated risks with specific long-term post-marketing evaluation similar to registries used for FMT. Their place in the therapeutic strategy for patients with rCDI requires further studies to determine the most appropriate patient population and administration route to prevent rCDI.

The effect of antibiotic therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection on mortality and other patient-relevant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current practice guidelines favour fidaxomicin over vancomycin and exclude metronidazole from the recommended standard regimen for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), based on lower recurrence rates with fidaxomicin, giving little weight to mortality or the clinical implications of recurrences.

OBJECTIVES

To compile the effects of metronidazole, glycopeptides (vancomycin or teicoplanin), and fidaxomicin for CDI on mortality and other patient-relevant outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, conference proceedings, and Google Scholar, until August 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients experiencing primary or recurrent CDI.

INTERVENTIONS

Glycopeptides versus fidaxomicin or metronidazole (comparators).

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

We used the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized trials, focusing on the outcome of all-cause mortality.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Random effects meta-analyses were performed for dichotomous outcomes. Outcomes were summarized preferentially for all randomly assigned patients.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials were included. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] < 1 favouring the comparator) between vancomycin and fidaxomicin (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.14, 8 RCTs, 1951 patients) or metronidazole (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46-1.32, 4 RCTs, 808 patients), with low and very low certainty of evidence, respectively. No significant difference in initial treatment failure between fidaxomicin and vancomycin was found, however, initial treatment failure was higher with metronidazole (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.10-2.27, 5 RCTs, 843 patients). No study reported on symptomatic recurrence necessitating re-treatment among all randomly assigned patients. Among initially cured patients, symptomatic recurrence necessitating re-treatment was lower with fidaxomicin than with vancomycin (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.71, 6 RCTs, 1617 patients). None of the studies reported on other CDI complications or the burden of infection on daily activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Setting patient-relevant outcomes for CDI independently of the RCT definitions and results might lead to less confidence in the guidance for CDI management.

Washed microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile infection: A national multicenter real-world study

OBJECTIVES

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recommended for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of washed microbiota transplantation (WMT), a new method of FMT, for CDI across various medical settings.

METHODS

This multicenter real-world cohort study included CDI patients undergoing WMT. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate of CDI within 8 weeks after WMT. Secondary outcomes included the CDI recurrence rate and reduction in total abdominal symptom score (TASS) during the follow-up period. Adverse events related to WMT were recorded.

RESULTS

Altogether 90.7% (49/54) of CDI patients achieved clinical cure after treated with WMT. The cure rate was 83.3% for cases with severe and complicated CDI (ScCDI) (n = 30) and 100% for non-ScCDI cases (n = 24) (P = 0.059). No difference was observed in the clinical cure rate between patients with first and recurrent CDI (91.9% vs 88.2%, P = 0.645). One week post-WMT, TASS showed a remarkable decrease compared to that at baseline (P < 0.001). Totally, 8.2% (4/49) of patients suffered CDI recurrence during the follow-up period. A WHO performance score of 4, age ≥65 years, higher TASS score, and higher Charlson comorbidity index score were potential risk factors for efficacy (P = 0.018, 0.03, 0.01, 0.034, respectively). Four (3.8%) transient adverse events related to WMT were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the attractive value of WMT for CDI. Early WMT may be recommended for CDI, especially for those in serious condition or with complex comorbidities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03895593 (registered on 27 March 2019).