1
|
Siefen AC, Kurte MS, Kron F. Economic effects of treating postpartum hemorrhage with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control devices - A budget impact analysis of the Jada® System in the German obstetrics setting. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 294:222-230. [PMID: 38301501 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the budget impact of vacuum-induced hemorrhage control (VHC) devices for treating postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance (SHI). STUDY DESIGN Evidence shows that treating PPH with VHC instead of uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) can reduce resource consumption (e.g., reduced number of blood transfusions and length of stay). A budget impact model combining aggregated German real-world reimbursement data of PPH cases with the assumption of resource reduction due to VHC usage was developed. Diagnosis-related groups (DRG) of PPH cases and their frequencies were collected using a publicly available database. A "downgrading mechanism" was performed, leading to a less resource-intensive DRG, i.e., resulting in a lower flat fee to be paid by SHI. Four subgroups were differentiated based on coded diagnoses and procedures: 1) PPH (O72.-) as main diagnosis, 2) PPH as secondary diagnosis, 3) UBT procedure coded, and 4) UBT or standard tamponade coded. Weighted averages of cost savings per case were calculated. RESULTS Data from 7,129 (subgroup 1), 49,523 (subgroup 2), 1,668 (subgroup 3), and 3,406 (subgroup 4) cases were retrieved. After applying the downgrading mechanism, cost savings (weighted average) resulted in 184.09 €, 210.50 €, 921.33 €, and 633.74 € for subgroups 1-4, respectively, CONCLUSION: This is the first German budget impact analysis of VHC for the treatment of PPH. Results showed the highest cost-saving potential for cases currently treated with UBT. Demonstrating not only clinical but also financial consequences of innovative treatments is crucial for the adoption into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melina S Kurte
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Kron
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany; Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kurte MS, Siefen AC, Jakobs F, von Tresckow B, Reinhardt HC, Kron F. Cost-effectiveness analysis of transplant-ineligible relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treatment options-Experience of the efficiency frontier approach. Eur J Haematol 2023; 111:895-908. [PMID: 37644352 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) changed remarkably since the European Medicines Agency-approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel], tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) for the third-line onwards (3+L), and targeted therapies (polatuzumab vedotin-bendamustine-rituximab [pola-BR], tafasitamab-lenalidomide [Tafa-L]) for the second-line (2L) onwards. As associated rising treatment costs represent an economic burden, the cost-effectiveness of transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL interventions was assessed from a German healthcare payer's perspective, using the efficiency frontier (EF) approach. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed to determine the clinical benefit concerning median overall survival (OS) of bendamustine-rituximab (BR), rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (R-GemOx), axi-cel, liso-cel, tisa-cel, pola-BR, and Tafa-L. First-year treatment costs (drug and medical services costs) were calculated. Results were merged on two-dimensional graphs illustrating 2L and 3+L EFs. RESULTS Second-line EF is formed by BR (median OS 11.49 months, €23 958) and Tafa-L (45.7, €104 541), 3+L EF is formed by R-GemOx (12.0, €29 080), Tafa-L (15.5, €104 541), and axi-cel (18.69, €308 516). These interventions build the respective cost-effectiveness thresholds for novel interventions. CONCLUSIONS Using the EF approach, the currently most cost-effective interventions (based on cost-effectiveness ratios) in the indication of R/R DLBCL were identified to guide international reimbursement decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Sophie Kurte
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Florian Jakobs
- Department of Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- Department of Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center and German Cancer consortium (DKTK partner site Essen), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hans Christian Reinhardt
- Department of Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Kron
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Siefen AC, Eilers L, Baltin CT, Kron F. Cost Comparison of Treatment Alternatives for Pleural Effusion and Ascites from a Payer Perspective: Are There Cost Savings from Indwelling Catheters? J Palliat Med 2023; 26:1510-1520. [PMID: 37352428 PMCID: PMC10658739 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The presence of pleural effusions and ascites in patients is often considered a marker of illness severity and a poor prognostic indicator. This study aims to compare inpatient and outpatient costs of alternative invasive treatments for ascites and pleural effusions. Methods: The retrospective single-institution study included inpatient cases treated for pleural effusion (J90 and J91) or ascites (R18) at the University Hospital Cologne (UHC) in Germany between January 01, 2020, and December 31, 2021. Costs for punctures and indwelling catheter systems (ICSs) as well as pleurodesis were analyzed in different comparator treatment pathways. Real-world data from the UHC tertiary care center were based on diagnosis-related group fees from 2020 to 2021. A simulation of outpatient expenses was carried out to compare inpatient and outpatient costs for each pathway from a payer perspective. Results: A total of 4323 cases (3396 pleural effusions and 1302 ascites) were analyzed. For ascites, inpatient implantation with home care drainage was found to be the most expensive option, with total costs of €1,918.58 per procedure, whereas outpatient puncture was the least expensive option at €60.02. For pleural effusions, the most expensive treatment pathway was pleurodesis at €8,867.84 compared with the least costly option of outpatient puncture resulting in total costs per procedure of €70.03. A break-even analysis showed that outpatient puncture remains the most inexpensive treatment option, and the ICS comprises a cost-saving potential. Longevity of several months with the use of ICSs results in both enhanced quality of life for patients and increased cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leonie Eilers
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany
- KCM KompetenzCentrum für Medizinoekonomie, FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph T. Baltin
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany
- KCM KompetenzCentrum für Medizinoekonomie, FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Kron
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- KCM KompetenzCentrum für Medizinoekonomie, FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simões Corrêa Galendi J, Siefen AC, Moretti DM, Yeo SY, Grüll H, Bratke G, Morganti AG, Bazzocchi A, Gasperini C, De Felice F, Blanco Sequeiros R, Huhtala M, Nijholt IM, Boomsma MF, Bos C, Verkooijen HM, Müller D, Stock S. Factors Influencing the Adoption of Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Painful Bone Metastases in Europe, A Group Concept Mapping Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20:1084. [PMID: 36673840 PMCID: PMC9858703 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is an innovative treatment for patients with painful bone metastases. The adoption of MR-HIFU will be influenced by several factors beyond its effectiveness. To identify contextual factors affecting the adoption of MR-HIFU, we conducted a group concept mapping (GCM) study in four European countries. The GCM was conducted in two phases. First, the participants brainstormed statements guided by the focus prompt "One factor that may influence the uptake of MR-HIFU in clinical practice is...". Second, the participants sorted statements into categories and rated the statements according to their importance and changeability. To generate a concept map, multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were conducted, and average ratings for each (cluster of) factors were calculated. Forty-five participants contributed to phase I and/or II (56% overall participation rate). The resulting concept map comprises 49 factors, organized in 12 clusters: "competitive treatments", "physicians' attitudes", "alignment of resources", "logistics and workflow", "technical disadvantages", "radiotherapy as first-line therapy", "aggregating knowledge and improving awareness", "clinical effectiveness", "patients' preferences", "reimbursement", "cost-effectiveness" and "hospital costs". The factors identified echo those from the literature, but their relevance and interrelationship are case-specific. Besides evidence on clinical effectiveness, contextual factors from 10 other clusters should be addressed to support adoption of MR-HIFU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Ann-Cathrine Siefen
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Debora M. Moretti
- Institute for Food and Resource Economics, Chair for Technology, Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Sin Yuin Yeo
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Grüll
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, 50939 Cologne, Germany
| | - Grischa Bratke
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Gasperini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Mira Huhtala
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Ingrid M. Nijholt
- Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn F. Boomsma
- Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Clemens Bos
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Müller
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|