Intradiscal pressure and kinematic behavior of lumbar spine after bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy

Biomechanical response of decompression alone in lower grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis--A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of decompression alone in lower-grade spondylolisthesis. A higher rate of surgical revision and a lower rate of back pain relief was also observed. However, there is a lack of relevant biomechanical evidence after decompression alone for lower-grade spondylolisthesis.

PURPOSE

Evaluating the biomechanical characteristics of total laminectomy, hemilaminectomy, and facetectomy for lower-grade spondylolisthesis by analyzing the range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), annulus fibrosus stress (AFS), facet joints contact force (FJCF), and isthmus stress (IS).

METHODS

Firstly, we utilized finite element tools to develop a normal lumbar model and subsequently constructed a spondylolisthesis model based on the normal model. We then performed total laminectomy, hemilaminectomy, and one-third facetectomy in the normal model and spondylolisthesis model, respectively. Finally, we analyzed parameters, such as ROM, IDP, AFS, FJCF, and IS, for all the models under the same concentrate force and moment.

RESULTS

The intact spondylolisthesis model showed a significant increase in the relative parameters, including ROM, AFS, FJCF, and IS, compared to the intact normal lumbar model. Hemilaminectomy and one-third facetectomy in both spondylolisthesis and normal lumbar models did not result in an obvious change in ROM, IDP, AFS, FJCF, and IS compared to the pre-operative state. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the degree of parameter changes between the spondylolisthesis and normal lumbar models after undergoing the same surgical procedures. However, total laminectomy significantly increased ROM, AFS, and IS and decreased the FJCF in both normal lumbar models and spondylolisthesis models.

CONCLUSION

Hemilaminectomy and one-third facetectomy did not have a significant impact on the segment stability of lower-grade spondylolisthesis; however, patients with LDS undergoing hemilaminectomy and one-third facetectomy may experience higher isthmus stress on the surgical side during rotation. In addition, total laminectomy changes the biomechanics in both normal lumbar models and spondylolisthesis models.

Invasiveness of decompression surgery affects modeled lumbar spine kinetics in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis

Introduction: The surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with accompanying spinal stenosis focuses mainly on decompression of the spinal canal with or without additional fusion by means of a dorsal spondylodesis. Currently, one main decision criterion for additional fusion is the presence of instability in flexion and extension X-rays. In cases of mild and stable spondylolisthesis, the optimal treatment remains a subject of ongoing debate. There exist different opinions on whether performing a fusion directly together with decompression has a potential benefit for patients or constitutes overtreatment. As X-ray images do not provide any information about internal biomechanical forces, computer simulation of individual patients might be a tool to gain a set of new decision criteria for those cases. Methods: To evaluate the biomechanical effects resulting from different decompression techniques, we developed a lumbar spine model using forward dynamic-based multibody simulation (FD_MBS). Preoperative CT data of 15 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis at the level L4/L5 who underwent spinal decompression were identified retrospectively. Based on the segmented vertebrae, 15 individualized models were built. To establish a reference for comparison, we simulated a standardized flexion movement (intact) for each model. Subsequently, we performed virtual unilateral and bilateral interlaminar fenestration (uILF, bILF) and laminectomy (LAM) by removing the respective ligaments in each model. Afterward, the standardized flexion movement was simulated again for each case and decompression method, allowing us to compare the outcomes with the reference. This comprehensive approach enables us to assess the biomechanical implications of different surgical approaches and gain valuable insights into their effects on lumbar spine functionality. Results: Our findings reveal significant changes in the biomechanics of vertebrae and intervertebral discs (IVDs) as a result of different decompression techniques. As the invasiveness of decompression increases, the moment transmitted on the vertebrae significantly rises, following the sequence intact ➝ uILF ➝ bILF ➝ LAM. Conversely, we observed a reduction in anterior-posterior shear forces within the IVDs at the levels L3/L4 and L4/L5 following LAM. Conclusion: Our findings showed that it was feasible to forecast lumbar spine kinematics after three distinct decompression methods, which might be helpful in future clinical applications.

Acute disc herniation following surgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparison of mini-open and minimally invasive techniques

BACKGROUND

Disc herniation following decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis is a less familiar surgical complication. Previous studies suggested that open lumbar decompression techniques, associated with relative segmental instability especially in the presence of degenerated disc in older patients, are more likely to result in disc herniation compared to minimally invasive techniques. The current study compares the incidence of acute disc herniation following mini-open and minimally invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study reviewing 563 patients who underwent spinal decompression for symptomatic lumbar stenosis by mini-open bilateral partial laminectomy technique or minimally invasive laminotomy utilizing a tubular system. Demographic and clinical data were collected and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative disc herniation rate was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group with 2 of 237 cases (0.8%) versus 19 of 326 cases (5.8%) in the mini-open group (p = 0.002). This finding was more noticeable following multi-level procedures with no case of postdecompression disc herniation in the minimally invasive group compared to 8 of 39 cases (20.5%) in the mini-open group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of postoperative disc herniation following spinal decompression for symptomatic lumbar stenosis was 5.8% following mini-open bilateral partial laminectomy compared to only 0.8% after minimally invasive laminotomy (p = 0.002). These findings highlight the more extensive nature of mini-open surgery associated with relative segmental instability that poses a greater risk for postoperative disc herniation.

Lumbar Pedicular Stress Fracture Post-laminectomy: a Case Report

We present the case of a 74-year-old male suffering from degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication resulting in reduced walking distance. MR imaging indicated spinal canal stenosis at the level of L3–L4 and L4–L5 due to degenerative discopathy, discal extrusion, and facet arthrosis. After conservative treatment had failed, a multilevel laminectomy was performed. Four months postoperatively, the patient developed a stress fracture of the L4 pedicle. Pedicular stress fractures are uncommon and few case reports are found in the literature. Usually, they occur due to contralateral spondylolysis or congenital anomalies. The findings in this case however suggest a change of biomechanical load over the pedicle due to spinal surgery. An overview of the literature concerning spinal instability after laminectomy is provided. Spinal decompressive surgery can significantly change the biomechanical forces on the spinal structures, resulting in important postoperative complications. Whether pedicle stress fracture in this case is a result of pre- or postoperative circumstances remains a subject for discussion.

Evaluation of Spinous Process Tethering at the Proximal End of Rigid Constructs: In Vitro Range of Motion and Intradiscal Pressure at Instrumented and Adjacent Levels

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity surgery requires use of long thoracolumbar instrumentation, which is associated with risk of postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Tethering has been used in spinal surgery but not around the spinous process (SP) in the context of preventing PJK.

METHODS

Researchers applied a nondestructive hybrid loading protocol to 7 T8-L2 cadaveric specimens in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (AR). A rigid construct (pedicle screws and rods) and 1- and 2-level SP constructs were tested, as was a hand-tie technique. SP tethering (SPT) constructs use clamps on both sides of the SP; SPT helix constructs use 1 clamp and wrap around the SP.

RESULTS

All tether constructs showed greater motion at the instrumented level and less motion at adjacent levels compared to rigid constructs. In AR, 1- and 2-level SPT constructs restricted first instrumented level motion to a greater extent when compared with other tether constructs (P ≤ .05). Passing the band through the T10 SP did not produce significant biomechanical differences compared to passing it through the T9-T10 interspinous ligament (P > .05). Hand-tied constructs demonstrated more motion compared to tensioned constructs (P > .05). Intradiscal pressure results corroborated motion data.

CONCLUSIONS

SPT at the proximal end of a rigid construct produced more favorable biomechanical outcomes at instrumented and adjacent levels than were seen with a completely rigid construct. Clinical research is needed to determine whether these methods reduce the risk of PJK among patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This work sheds light on the biomechanical stability of proximal tethering constructs in an effort to enhance the surgeon's ability to reduce rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: a finite element analysis

Background

An interspinous process device, the Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM™) designed to treat lumbar neurogenic disease secondary to the lumbar spinal stenosis, it provides dynamic stabilization after minimally invasive (MI) lumbar decompression. The current study was conducted using an experimentally validated L1-L5 spinal finite element model (FEM) to evaluate the limited decompression on range of motion (ROM) and stress distribution on a neural arch implanted with the DIAM.

Methods

The study simulated bilateral laminotomies with partial discectomy at L3-L4, as well as unilateral and bilateral laminotomies with partial discectomy combined with implementation of the DIAM at L3-L4. The ROM and maximum von Mises stresses in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion were analyzed in response to the hybrid protocol in comparison with the intact model.

Results

The investigation revealed that decreased ROM, intradiscal stress, and facet joint force at the implant level, but considerably increased stress at the pars interarticularis were found during flexion and torsion at the L4, as well as during extension, lateral bending, and torsion at the L3, when the DIAM was implanted compared with the defect model.

Conclusion

The results demonstrate that the DIAM may be beneficial in reducing the symptoms of stress-induced low back pain. Nevertheless, the results also suggest that a surgeon should be cognizant of the stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis results from MI decompression plus the application of the interspinous process device.

Results of cervical recapping laminoplasty: gross anatomical changes, biomechanical evaluation at different time points and degrees of level involvement

Background

Recapping laminoplasty has become the frequently-used approach to the spinal canal when bone decompression of the vertebral canal is not the goal. However, what changes will occur after surgery, and whether recapping laminoplasty can actually reduce the risk of delayed deformities remains unknown.

Methodology

We designed an animal experiment using a caprine model, and partitioned the animals into in vitro and in vivo surgical groups. We performed recapping laminoplasty on one group and laminectomy on another group. These animals were sacrificed six months after operating, cervical spines removed, biomechanically tested, and these data were compared to determine whether the recapping laminoplasty technique leads to subsequent differences in range of motion. Image data were also obtained before the surgery and when the animals were killed. Besides, we investigated the initial differences in kinetics between recapping laminoplasty and laminectomy. We did this by comparing data obtained from biomechanical testing of in vitro-performed recapping laminoplasty and laminectomy. Finally, we investigated the effect that longitudinal distance has on cervical mechanics. This was determined by performing a two-level recapping laminoplasty, and then extending the laminoplasty to the next level and repeating the mechanical testing at each step.

Principal Findings

There were three mainly morphological changes at the six months after laminoplasty: volume reduction and bone nonunion of the recapping laminae, irregular fibrosis formation around the facet joints and re-implanted lamina-ligamentous complex. In the biomechanical test, comparing with laminectomy, recapping laminoplasty didn’t show significant differences in the immediate postoperative comparison, while recapping laminoplasty demonstrated significantly decreased motion in flexion/extension six months later. Inclusion of additional levels in the laminotomy procedure didn’t lead to changes in immediate biomechanics.

Conclusions

Recapping laminoplasty can’t fully restore the posterior structure, but still reduced the risk of delayed cervical instability in a caprine model.

Lumbar facet joint and intervertebral disc loading during simulated pelvic obliquity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Intervertebral disc and facet joints are the two primary load-bearing structures of the lumbar spine, and altered loading to these structures may be associated with frontal plane spinal deviations.

PURPOSE

To determine the load on the lumbar facet joint and intervertebral disc under simulated frontal plane pelvic obliquity combined loading, an in vitro biomechanical study was conducted.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

An in vitro biomechanical study using a repeated-measures design was used to compare L4-L5 facet joint and intervertebral disc loading across pure moment and combined loading conditions.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen lumbosacral specimens were tested under five loading conditions: flexion/extension, lateral bending, axial rotation using pure moment bending (±10 Nm), and two additional tests investigating frontal plane pelvic obliquity and axial rotation (sacrum tilted left 5° and at 10° followed by a ±10-Nm rotation moment). Three-dimensional kinematics, facet load, and intradiscal pressures were recorded from the L4-L5 functional spinal unit.

RESULTS

Sagittal and frontal plane loading resulted in significantly smaller facet joint forces compared with conditions implementing a rotation moment (p<.05). The facet joint had the highest peak load during the 10° combined loading condition (124.0±30.2 N) and the lowest peak load in flexion (26.8±16.1 N). Intradiscal pressure was high in lateral flexion (495.6±280.9 kPa) and flexion (429.0±212.9 kPa), whereas intradiscal pressures measured in rotation (253.2±135.0 kPa) and 5° and 10° combined loading conditions were low (255.5±132.7 and 267.1±127.1 kPa, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Facet loading increased during simulated pelvic obliquity in frontal and transverse planes, whereas intradiscal pressures were decreased compared with sagittal and frontal plane motions alone. Altered spinopelvic alignment may increase the loads experienced by spinal tissue, especially the facet joints.

Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression- a finite element study

BACKGROUND

The Dynesys system provides stability for destabilized spines while preserving segmental motion. However, clinical studies have demonstrated that the Dynesys system does not prevent adjacent segment disease. Moreover, biomechanical studies have revealed that the stiffness of the Dynesys system is comparable to rigid fixation. Our previous studies showed that adjusting the cord pretension of the Dynesys system alleviates stress on the adjacent level during flexion. We also demonstrated that altering the stiffness of Dynesys system spacers can alleviate stress on the adjacent level during extension of the intact spine. In the present study, we hypothesized that omitting the cord preload and changing the stiffness of the Dynesys system spacers would abate stress shielding on adjacent spinal segments.

METHODS

Finite element models were developed for - intact spine (INT), facetectomy and laminectomy at L3-4 (DEC), intact spine with Dynesys system (IntDyWL), decompressed spine with Dynesys system (DecDyWL), decompressed spine with Dynesys system without cord preload (DecDyNL), and decompressed spine with Dynesys system assembled using spacers that were 0.8 times the standard diameter without cord pretension (DecDyNL0.8). These models were subjected to hybrid control for flexion, extension, axial rotation; and lateral bending.

RESULTS

The greatest decreases in range of motion (ROM) at the L3-4 level occurred for axial rotation and lateral bending in the IntDyWL model and for flexion and extension in the DecDyWL model. The greatest decreases in disc stress occurred for extension and lateral bending in the IntDyWL model and for flexion in the DecDyWL model. The greatest decreases in facet contact force occurred for extension and lateral bending in the DecDyNL model and for axial rotation in the DecDyWL model. The greatest increases in ROMs at L2-3 level occurred for flexion, axial rotation and lateral bending in IntDyWL model and for extension in the DecDyNL model. The greatest increases in disc stress occurred for flexion, axial rotation and lateral bending in the IntDyWL model and for extension in the DecDyNL model. The greatest increases in facet contact force occurred for extension and lateral bending in the DecDyNL model and for axial rotation in the IntDyWL model.

CONCLUSIONS

The results reveals that removing the Dynesys system cord pretension attenuates the ROMs, disc stress, and facet joint contact forces at adjacent levels during flexion and axial rotation. Removing cord pretension together with softening spacers abates stress shielding for adjacent segment during four different moments, and it provides enough security while not jeopardizes the stability of spine during axial rotation.

Comparative analysis of posterior fusion constructs as treatments for middle and posterior column injuries: an in vitro biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND

Titanium pedicle screw-rod instrumentation is considered a standard treatment for spinal instability; however, the advantages of cobalt-chromium over titanium is generating interest in orthopedic practice. The aim of this study was to compare titanium versus cobalt-chromium rods in posterior fusion through in vitro biomechanical testing.

METHODS

Posterior and middle column injuries were simulated at L3-L5 in six cadaveric L1-S1 human spines and different pedicle screw constructs were implanted. Specimens were subjected to flexibility tests and range of motion, intradiscal pressure and axial rotation energy loss were statistically compared among five conditions: intact, titanium rods (with and without transverse connectors) and cobalt-chromium rods (with and without transverse connectors).

FINDINGS

All fusion constructs significantly (P<0.01) decreased range of motion in flexion-extension and lateral bending with respect to intact, but no significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in axial rotation among all conditions. Intradiscal pressure significantly increased (P≤0.01) after fusion, except for the cobalt-chrome conditions in extension (P≥0.06), and no significant differences (P>0.99) were found among fixation constructs. In terms of energy loss, differences became significant P≤0.05 between the cobalt-chrome with transverse connector condition with respect to the cobalt-chrome and titanium conditions.

INTERPRETATION

There is not enough evidence to support that the cobalt-chrome rods performed biomechanically different than the titanium rods. The inclusion of the transverse connector only increased stability for the cobalt-chromium construct in axial rotation.

Kinematic effects of a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

OBJECT

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) may lead to disabling neurogenic symptoms and has traditionally been treated using open laminectomy. A new technique for correcting LSS involves lengthening the lumbar pedicles through bilateral percutaneous pedicle osteotomies. In this paper, the authors' goal was to evaluate the changes in spinal canal dimensions and kinematic behavior after pedicle-lengthening osteotomies.

METHODS

The kinematic behavior of 8 cadaveric lumbar segments was evaluated intact and after bilateral pedicle-lengthening osteotomies at the L-4, L-5, and L-4 and L-5 levels. Testing was conducted with and without a compressive preload using a custom kinematic apparatus that allowed for 3D tracking of each vertebra during flexion-extension, right-left bending, and right-left rotation. A validated finite element (FE) spine model was used to measure the changes in the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal and neural foramen after 2-, 3-, and 4.5-mm simulated pedicle-lengthening osteotomy procedures.

RESULTS

The overall and segmental kinematics were not significantly altered after the pedicle-lengthening osteotomy procedure at the L-4 and/or L-5 pedicles. The kinematic signatures of the intact and lengthened states were similar for all motion pairs. The FE spine model yielded kinematics predictions within or close to the 95% confidence interval for the cadaveric data. The FE spine demonstrated substantial, pedicle length-dependent enlargement of the cross-sectional areas of the spinal canal and neural foramen after simulated pedicle lengthening.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral pedicle-lengthening osteotomies produced substantial increases in the cross-sectional areas of the spinal canal and neural foramen without significantly altering normal spinal kinematics. This technique deserves further study as a less invasive treatment option for LSS.

Construction of artificial laminae of the vertebral arch using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells transplanted in collagen sponge

STUDY DESIGN

A rabbit laminectomy model was used to evaluate the efficacy of artificial laminae of vertebral arch using bone marrow-derived osteoblasts transplanted in a collagen sponge.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to reconstruct the artificial laminae of vertebral arch using bone marrow-derived osteoblasts transplanted in a collagen sponge on a rabbit model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Because the laminectomy and semilaminectomy can effectively decompress the spinal cord and expand the vertebral canal, they have been performed as routine surgical procedures. However, long-term follow-up results show that these procedures can lead to many serious complications. A variety of strategies have been used to solve these complications, but there are few experiments to determine the efficacy of reconstructing the laminae of vertebral arch using bone marrow-derived osteoblasts and the collagen sponge.

METHODS

The bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) from the bone marrow in the femur of 2-week-old rabbits were obtained by centrifugation and adhesion. The BMSCs were induced to differentiate into osteoblasts, which were transplanted into collagen sponge to construct the tissue-engineering bone. A total of 48 rabbits were randomly divided into three groups. Lumbar laminectomies were performed on all of the rabbits. Group A was the control. Groups B and C were implanted with collagen sponge and tissue-engineering bone, respectively. The artificial laminae of the vertebral arch were examined qualitatively by imageology and histomorphometry.

RESULTS

The artificial laminae of the vertebral arch successfully formed 4 weeks after the operation in group C; computed tomography examination at 4 weeks showed that the new laminae of vertebral arch were formed, and that the vertebral canal was intact.

CONCLUSION

The artificial laminae of the vertebral arch can be successfully constructed using tissue engineering of transplanted BMSCs.

The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison

STUDY DESIGN

A cadaveric simulation model of the lumbar spine was used to study the intervertebral motion characteristics of the lumbar spine after bilateral laminotomy and facet-sparing laminectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in motion patterns and lumbar spine stiffness after bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spondylolisthesis after facet-sparing laminectomy has been reported with a frequency of 8% to 31%. Bilateral laminotomies have been shown to be effective in decompressing the spine, without resection of the posterior osteo-ligamentous complex. We hypothesize that bilateral laminotomies induce significantly less iatrogenic hypermobility and less stiffness reduction than a traditional facet-sparing laminectomy in the lumbar spine.

METHODS

Six fresh frozen human cadaveric lumbar spines (L1-L5) were mounted into a spine motion simulator for testing. With physiologic follower preload, flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments were applied to the lumbar spine in 3 trials: (1) Intact lumbar spine-no surgery, (2) Lumbar spine after bilateral lumbar laminotomies at L2-L5, (3) Lumbar spine after full laminectomies at L2-L5. The lumbar spine kinematics were measured using a Vicon motion tracking system. Total and segmental range of motion and spine stiffness were recorded.

RESULTS

In flexion/extension, bilateral laminotomies resulted in an average increase in L2-L5 range of flexion/extension motion of 14.3%, whereas a full laminectomy resulted in an increase of 32.0% (P<0.05). Analysis per level demonstrated roughly twofold increase in motion with laminectomy compared with bilateral laminotomies (P<0.05, at every treated level). Stiffness was decreased by an average of 11.8% after the 3-level-laminotomies and by 27.2% (P<0.05) after the 3-level-laminectomy.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that bilateral laminotomies induce significantly less hypermobility and less stiffness reduction compared with a full laminectomy. The preservation of the central posterior osteo-ligamentous structures may provide a stabilizing effect in preventing postdecompression spondylolisthesis.

How does spinal canal decompression and dorsal stabilization affect segmental mobility? A biomechanical study

INTRODUCTION

When decompression of the lumbar spinal canal is performed, segmental stability might be affected. Exactly which anatomical structures can thereby be resected without interfering with stability, and when, respectively how, additional stabilization is essential, has not been adequately investigated so far. The present investigation describes kinetic changes in a surgically treated motion segment as well as in its adjacent segments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Segmental biomechanical examination of nine human lumbar cadaver spines (L1 to L5) was performed without preload in a spine-testing apparatus by means of a precise, ultrasound-guided measuring system. Thus, samples consisting of four free motion segments were made available. Besides measurements in the native (untreated) spine specimen further measurements were done after progressive resection of dorsal elements like lig. flavum, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and facetectomy. The segment was then stabilised by means of a rigid system (ART((R))) and by means of a dynamic, transpedicularly fixed system (Dynesys((R))).

RESULTS

For the analysis, range of motion (ROM) values and separately viewed data of the respective direction of motion were considered in equal measure. A very high reproducibility of the individual measurements could be verified. In the sagittal and frontal plane, flavectomy and hemilaminectomy did not achieve any relevant change in the ROM in both directions. This applies to the segment operated on as well as to the adjacent segments examined. Resection of the facet likewise does not lead to any distinct increase of mobility in the operated segment as far as flexion and right/left bending is concerned. In extension a striking increase in mobility of more than 1degree compared to the native value can be perceived in the operated segment. Stabilization with the rigid and dynamic system effect an almost equal reduction of flexion/extension and right/left bending. In the adjacent segments, a slightly higher mobility is to be noted for rigid stabilization than for dynamic stabilisation. A linear regression analysis shows that in flexion/extension monosegmental rigid stabilisation is compensated predominantly in the first cranial adjacent segment. In case of a dynamic stabilisation the compensation is distributed among the first and second cranial, and by 20% in the caudal adjacent segment.

SUMMARY

Monosegmental decompression of the lumbar spinal canal does not essentially destabilise the motion segment during in vitro conditions. Regarding rigid or dynamic stabilisation, the ROM does not differ within the operated segment, but the distribution of the compensatory movement is different.

Biomechanical and radiographic evaluation of an ovine model for the human lumbar spine

While various species of animal models have been used in preclinical investigations of spinal implant devices to assess their biological adaptation and biomechanical performance, few studies have made comprehensive comparisons to validate their suitability of modelling the human spine. The purpose of this study was to assess essential biomechanical behaviours and disc morphology of the ovine lumbar model. Flexibility testing was conducted on the spines (L3—L4 and L4—L5) of nine skeletally matured sheep. Segmental rotation and intradiscal pressure were measured and load sharing between the intervertebral disc and posterior elements were calculated on the basis of a simplified parallel spring model. Following the tests, the spinal segments were sectioned into a series of sagittal slabs, and transverse radiographs of these slabs were taken to evaluate the variation in the disc height and end-plate curvature. Comparing the biomechanical and radiographic results with published data on the human lumbar spine, good comparability between the ovine and cadaveric lumbar spines was found in terms of the general disc shape and in most of the biomechanical parameters including the range of motion, neutral zone, and load sharing between the intervertebral disc and posterior elements. A few distinctive differences were also found between the two, including flatter sagittal alignment, smaller disc dimensions, and greater lateral bending motion in the ovine model.

Stress in lumbar intervertebral discs during distraction: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The intervertebral disc is a common source of low back pain (LBP). Prospective studies suggest that treatments that intermittently distract the disc might be beneficial for chronic LBP. Although the potential exists for distraction therapies to affect the disc biomechanically, their effect on intradiscal stress is debated.

PURPOSE

To determine if distraction alone, distraction combined with flexion, or distraction combined with extension can reduce nucleus pulposus pressure and posterior annulus compressive stress in cadaveric lumbar discs compared with simulated standing or lying.

STUDY DESIGN

Laboratory study using single cadaveric motion segments.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Strain gauge measures of nucleus pulposus pressure and compressive stress in the anterior and posterior annulus fibrosus.

METHODS

Intradiscal stress profilometry was performed on 15 motion segments during 5 simulated conditions: standing, lying, and 3 distracted conditions. Disc degeneration was graded by inspection from 1 (normal) to 4 (severe degeneration).

RESULTS

All distraction conditions markedly reduced nucleus pressure compared with either simulated standing or lying. There was no difference between distraction with flexion and distraction with extension in regard to posterior annulus compressive stress. Discs with little or no degeneration appeared to distribute compressive stress differently than those with moderate or severe degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

Distraction appears to predictably reduce nucleus pulposus pressure. The effect of distraction therapy on the distribution of compressive stress may be dependent in part on the health of the disc.

Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?

Pre-clinical in vitro tests are needed to evaluate the biomechanical performance of new spinal implants. For such experiments large animal models are frequently used. Whether these models allow any conclusions concerning the implant's performance in humans is difficult to answer. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether calf, pig or sheep spine specimens may be used to replace human specimens in in vitro flexibility and cyclic loading tests with two different implant types. First, a dynamic and a rigid fixator were tested using six human, six calf, six pig and six sheep thoracolumbar spine specimens. Standard flexibility tests were carried out in a spine tester in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the intact state, after nucleotomy and after implantation. Then, the Coflex interspinous implant was tested for flexibility and intradiscal pressure using another six human and six calf lumbar spine segments. Loading was carried out as described above in the intact condition, after creation of a defect and after implantation. The fixators were most easily implantable into the calf. Qualitatively, they had similar effects on ROM in all species, however, the degree of stability achieved differed. Especially in axial rotation, the ROM of sheep, pig and calf was partially less than half the human ROM. Similarly, implantation of the Coflex interspinous implant caused the ROM to either increase in both species or to decrease in both of them, however, quantitatively, differences were observed. This was also the case for the intradiscal pressure. In conclusion, animal species, especially the calf, may be used to get a first idea of how a new pedicle screw system or an interspinous implant behaves in in vitro flexibility tests. However, the effects on ROM and intradiscal pressure have to be expected to differ in magnitude between animal and human. Therefore, the last step in pre-clinical implant testing should always be an experiment with human specimens.

Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis and lumbar spinal stenosis

Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis is one of the dysplasias of endochondral bone formation. We report a patient with this condition combined with lumbar spinal stenosis and intervertebral disc herniation. This coexistence has not been previously reported in the medical literature. The possible mechanisms of this clinical association is discussed.

Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical study to quantify 3-dimensional kinematics of the lumbar spine following facet arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the multidirectional flexibility properties and helical axis of motion of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System (TFAS) (Archus Orthopedics, Redmond, WA) to the intact condition and to posterior pedicle screw fixation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Facet arthroplasty in the lumbar spine is a new concept in the field of spinal surgery. The kinematic behavior of any complete facet arthroplasty device in the lumbar spine has not been reported previously.

METHODS

Flexibility tests were conducted on 13 cadaveric specimens in an intact and injury model, and after stabilization with the TFAS and posterior pedicle screw fixation at the L4-L5 level. A pure moment of +/-10 Nm with a compressive follower preload of 600 N was applied to the specimen in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. Range of motion (ROM), neutral zone, and helical axis of motion were calculated for the L4-L5 segment.

RESULTS

ROM with the TFAS was 81% of intact in flexion (P = 0.035), 68% in extension (P = 0.079), 88% in lateral bending (P = 0.042), and 128% in axial rotation (P = 0.013). The only significant change in neutral zone with TFAS compared to the intact was an increase in axial rotation (P = 0.011). The only significant difference in helical axis of motion location or orientation between the TFAS and intact condition was an anterior shift of the helical axis of motion in axial rotation (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The TFAS allowed considerable motion in all directions tested, with ROM being less than the intact in flexion and lateral bending, and greater than the intact in axial rotation. The helical axis of motion with the TFAS was not different from intact in flexion-extension and lateral bending, but it was shifted anteriorly in axial rotation. The kinematics of the TFAS were more similar to the intact spine than were the kinematics of the posterior fixation when applied to a destabilized lumbar spine.

Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase vertebral translation and intradiscal pressure

To date, there are only a few studies that provide data to efficiently calibrate finite element models for the spine due to its complexity. In a recent study, we quantified the range of motion rotation and the lordosis angle. This paper provides complementary results regarding two more parameters, intradiscal pressure and vertebral translation. All parameters were obtained as a function of stepwise anatomical reduction, loading direction and magnitude. Eight lumbar spinal segments (L4-5) with a median age of 52 years (38-59 years) and no signs of disc degeneration were used for the in vitro testing. A miniaturized pressure probe was implanted into the nucleus. An ultrasound-based motion-tracking system was employed to record spatial movements of several landmarks on the specimens. The center of L4, the anterior, posterior, left and right point of the lower endplate of L4 were digitized as landmarks and its translation was determined. Specimens were loaded with pure moments (1-10Nm) in the three principal anatomical planes at a loading rate of 1.0 degrees /s. Anatomy was stepwise reduced by cutting different ligaments, facet capsules and joints and removing nucleus. Translation analysis showed that the L4 center point had its largest displacement in sagittal direction and almost none vertically. Removal of the supra- and interspinous, flaval ligaments showed a slight increase and further removal of structures, a higher increase of translation. Axial rotation also was accompanied with L4 to elevate when torsion was applied. This effect was found to be larger with progressing defects. Nucleotomy exhibited the most unstable situation for specimens. Results of the intradiscal pressure indicated a large increase after removing the facet capsules and joints. Furthermore, it was found that intradiscal pressure correlated well with data of range of motion for rotation. Predicting and simulating clinical defects, surgical intervention or treatment methods requires a well performed calibration based on in vitro data, whereas it is important to adapt all including structures with as many known parameters as possible. Results provided by these studies may be used as a database for researchers aiming to calibrate or validate finite element models of L4-5 segments.

A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Axial back pain affects a large percentage of the population. Often aggravated by weight-bearing activity, these patients frequently have associated degenerative or post-traumatic lumbar disc disease. Aquatherapy is frequently used to transition patients from less activity limited by pain to greater activity by reducing weight-bearing load of the lumbar spine. Development of a means to permit patients similar spinal unloading while active during normal daily living would have the potential to promote similar effects.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to measure internal disc pressure at L4/L5 in response to forces exerted by an external vest. The study hypothesis anticipated an unloading of the lumbar spine during upright posture, as measured by intradicsal pressure at the L4/5 disc, correlating with external forces provided to the trunk by the device.

STUDY DESIGN

A controlled experimental study of spine biomechanical loading was undertaken using isolated cadaver torsos obtained from an approved tissue source. Ages ranged at death with a mean of 65+/-6 years.

METHODS

The distractive force created by inflating a set of pneumatic lifters within vests for treatment of low back pain were calibrated in a materials testing machine. Effects of inflation on the disc pressures within the lumbar spine then were tested. A microscopic pressure sensor (Samba, Gothenburg, Sweden) was placed into the nucleus of the L4/L5 disc of six isolated cadaver torsos (1 female, 5 male) using a 15-gauge spinal needle under direct fluoroscopic visualization. The pressure sensor was 0.42 mm in diameter, and had a calibrated response range of 0-7500 mm Hg. A pneumatically actuated lumbar vest was fit snugly to the torso. Each torso was supported in an upright, weight-bearing position for testing. The vest was inflated while the internal disc pressure was monitored and recorded. The data were analyzed to test for correlation between the amount of external unloading force provided by the vest and the intradiscal pressure measured in vitro.

RESULTS

Application of external loads between the pelvis and ribcage by the vest demonstrated a maximum mean reduction of internal disc pressure at L4/L5 of 25% when the vest was inflated to a level producing approximately 400 N of effective load. The reduction in disc pressure was significantly different compared with baseline (upright, weight-bearing disc pressure without the vest) for all distraction settings (p<.01) except for the very lowest setting which was significant only at p=.025.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal unloading with an externally applied vest with adequate surface interface is effective in reducing intradiscal pressures. Ambulatory reduction of pressure would permit beneficial reduction of loads and permit patients with weight-bearing intolerance a better quality of life.