Developmental fate of mitochondria microinjected into murine zygotes

Mitochondrial Inheritance Following Nuclear Transfer: From Cloned Animals to Patients with Mitochondrial Disease

Mitochondria are indispensable power plants of eukaryotic cells that also act as a major biochemical hub. As such, mitochondrial dysfunction, which can originate from mutations in the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA), may impair organism fitness and lead to severe diseases in humans. MtDNA is a multi-copy, highly polymorphic genome that is uniparentally transmitted through the maternal line. Several mechanisms act in the germline to counteract heteroplasmy (i.e., coexistence of two or more mtDNA variants) and prevent expansion of mtDNA mutations. However, reproductive biotechnologies such as cloning by nuclear transfer can disrupt mtDNA inheritance, resulting in new genetic combinations that may be unstable and have physiological consequences. Here, we review the current understanding of mitochondrial inheritance, with emphasis on its pattern in animals and human embryos generated by nuclear transfer.

Mitochondrial biology in reproduction

Mitochondrial biology plays an important role in the reproductive process, with influence on germ cell development and quality as well as embryonic development and reproductive success. This review outlines the role of mitochondrial genetics and function in reproductive biology, including a discussion of general mitochondrial function, genetics and germline transmission. Also highlighted are the mitochondrial morphologic changes that occur during oogenesis and the role these changes play in the mitochondrial bottleneck that influences the distribution of deleterious mitochondrial genomes to offspring. The review covers the influence of mitochondria in embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell biology and development. Lastly, the role of mitochondrial biology in assisted reproductive techniques is discussed.

Constant transmission of mitochondrial DNA in intergeneric cloned embryos reconstructed from swamp buffalo fibroblasts and bovine ooplasm

Although interspecies/intergeneric somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) has been proposed as a tool to produce offspring of endangered species, conflict between donor nucleus and recipient cytoplasm in iSCNT embryos has been identified as an impediment to implementation for agricultural production. To investigate the nuclear-mitochondrial interactions on the developmental potential of iSCNT embryos, we analyzed the mtDNA copy numbers in iSCNT embryos reconstructed with water buffalo (swamp type) fibroblasts and bovine enucleated oocytes (buffalo iSCNT). As controls, SCNT embryos were derived from bovine fibroblasts (bovine SCNT). Buffalo iSCNT and bovine SCNT embryos showed similar rates of cleavage and development to the 8-cell stage (P>0.05). However, buffalo iSCNT embryos did not develop beyond the 16-cell stage. Both bovine and buffalo mtDNA content in buffalo iSCNT embryos was stable throughout the nuclear transfer process, and arrested at the 8- to 16-cell stage (P>0.05). In bovine SCNT embryos that developed to the blastocyst stage, mtDNA copy number was increased (P<0.05). In conclusion, both the donor cell and recipient cytoplast mtDNAs of buffalo iSCNT embryos were identified and maintained through the iSCNT process until the 8-16-cell stage. In addition, the copy number of mtDNA per embryo was a useful monitor to investigate nuclear-mitochondrial interactions.

Effects of Granulosa Cell Mitochondria Transfer on the Early Development of Bovine Embryos In Vitro

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of exogenous mitochondria obtained from granulosa cells on the development of bovine embryos in vitro. We classified cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) as good (G)- and poor (P)-quality oocytes based on cytoplasmic appearance and cumulus characteristics, and assessed mtDNA copy numbers in the G and P oocytes with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The mitochondria were isolated by fractionation and suspended in mitochondria injection buffer (MIB). Part one of the experiment consisted of the following treatments: (1) G-oocytes + sperm, (2) P-oocytes + mitochondria + MIB + sperm, (3) P-oocytes + MIB + sperm, and (4) P-oocytes + sperm. In part 2, oocytes were parthenogenetically activated. The treatments were: (1) G-oocytes, (2) P-oocytes + mitochondria + MIB, (3) P-oocytes + MIB, and (4) P-oocytes alone. The results indicated a significant difference in mtDNA copy number between G (361 113 +/- 147 114) and P (198 293 +/- 174 178) oocytes (p < 0.01). The rates of morula, blastocyst, and hatched blastocysts derived from P-oocytes + mitochondria were similar to those of G-oocytes, but significantly higher than P-oocytes without exogenous mitochondria in both the ICSI and parthenogenetic activation experiments. We found no difference in blastomere numbers between G-oocytes and P-oocytes + mitochondria in either experiment, but blastomere numbers in these two groups were significantly higher than in P-oocyte groups without exogenous mitochondria. These data suggest that mtDNA content is very important for early embryo development. Furthermore, the transfer of mitochondria from the same breed may improve embryo quality during preimplantation development.

Cybrid models of mtDNA disease and transmission, from cells to mice

Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is the only mammalian biochemical pathway dependent on the coordinated assembly of protein subunits encoded by both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genes. Cytoplasmic hybrid cells, cybrids, are created by introducing mtDNAs of interest into cells depleted of endogenous mtDNAs, and have been a central tool in unraveling effects of disease-linked mtDNA mutations. In this way, the nuclear genetic complement is held constant so that observed effects on OXPHOS can be linked to the introduced mtDNA. Cybrid studies have confirmed such linkage for many defined, disease-associated mutations. In general, a threshold principle is evident where OXPHOS defects are expressed when the proportion of mutant mtDNA in a heteroplasmic cell is high. Cybrids have also been used where mtDNA mutations are not known, but are suspected, and have produced some support for mtDNA involvement in more common neurodegenerative diseases. Mouse modeling of mtDNA transmission and disease has recently taken advantage of cybrid approaches. By using cultured cells as intermediate carriers of mtDNAs, ES cell cybrids have been produced in several laboratories by pretreatment of the cells with rhodamine 6G before cytoplast fusion. Both homoplasmic and heteroplasmic mice have been produced, allowing modeling of mtDNA transmission through the mouse germ line. We also briefly review and compare other transgenic approaches to modeling mtDNA dynamics, including mitochondrial injection into oocytes or zygotes, and embryonic karyoplast transfer. When breakthrough technology for mtDNA transformation arrives, cybrids will remain valuable for allowing exchange of engineered mtDNAs between cells.

Microinjection of Cytoplasm or Mitochondria Derived from Somatic Cells Affects Parthenogenetic Development of Murine Oocytes1

Cloned mammals are readily obtained by nuclear transfer using cultured somatic cells; however, the rate of generating live offspring from the reconstructed embryos remains low. In nuclear transfer procedures, varying quantities of donor cell mitochondria are transferred with nuclei into recipient oocytes, and mitochondrial heteroplasmy has been observed. A mouse model was used to examine whether transferred mitochondria affect the development of the reconstructed oocytes. Cytoplasm or purified mitochondria from somatic cells derived from the external ear, skeletal muscle, and testis of Mus spretus mice or cumulus cells of Mus musculus domesticus mice were transferred into M. m. domesticus (B6SJLF1 and B6D2F1) oocytes to observe parthenogenetic development through the morula stage. All B6D2F1 oocytes injected with somatic cytoplasm or mitochondria showed delayed development when compared to oocytes injected with buffer. The developmental rates were not different among injected cell sources, with the exception of testis-derived donor cells injected into B6SJLF1 oocytes (P < 0.01). The developmental rate of B6D2F1 oocytes injected with buffer alone (98.8% survival) was different from those injected with somatic cytoplasm (60.8% survival) or somatic mitochondria (56.5% survival) (P < 0.01). Conversely, injection of ooplasm into B6D2F1 oocytes did not affect parthenogenetic development (100% survival). Our results indicate that injection of somatic cytoplasm or mitochondria affected parthenogenetic development of murine oocytes. These results have further implications for in vitro fertilization protocols employing ooplasmic transfer where primary oocyte failure is not confirmed.