Plasma cytokine levels imbalance in cirrhotic patients with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus. A prospective study

Type 2 diabetes mellitus increases liver transplant-free mortality in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the prognosis and complications of liver cirrhosis is not fully clarified.

AIM

To clarify the mortality and related risk factors as well as complications in cirrhotic patients with T2DM.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to December 1, 2020 for cohort studies comparing liver transplant-free mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), variceal bleeding, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in cirrhotic patients with vs without T2DM. Odds ratios (ORs) were combined by using fixed-effects or random-effects models with RevMan software.

RESULTS

The database search generated a total of 17 cohort studies that met the inclusion criteria. Among these studies, eight reported the risk of mortality, and eight reported the risk of HCC. Three studies provided SBP rates, and two documented ascites rates. Four articles focused on HE rates, and three focused on variceal bleeding rates. Meta-analysis indicated that T2DM was significantly associated with an increased risk of liver transplant-free mortality [OR: 1.28, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.16-1.41, P < 0.0001] and HCC incidence (OR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.32-2.51, P = 0.003). The risk of SBP was not significantly increased (OR: 1.16 95%CI: 0.86-1.57, P = 0.34). Additionally, T2DM did not significantly increase HE (OR: 1.31 95%CI: 0.97-1.77, P = 0.08), ascites (OR: 1.11 95%CI: 0.84-1.46, P = 0.46), and variceal bleeding (OR: 1.34, 95%CI: 0.99-1.82, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that cirrhotic patients with T2DM have a poor prognosis and high risk of HCC. T2DM may not be associated with an increased risk of SBP, variceal bleeding, ascites, or HE in cirrhotic patients with T2DM.

Salvianolate Reduces Glucose Metabolism Disorders in Dimethylnitrosamine-Induced Cirrhotic Rats

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the preventive effect of salvianolate (Sal B) on glucose metabolism disorders of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN)-induced cirrhotic rats.

METHODS

Fifty-five Wistar rats were randomly divided into a control group (n=10) and a cirrhotic group (n=45) according to a random number table. Liver cirrhosis was induced by intraperitoneal administration of DMN. The cirrhotic rats were divided into model, Sal B and metformin groups (n=15), respectively. Rats in the model group were given saline, two treatment groups were given Sal B (50 mg/kg), metformin (150 mg/kg) respectively for 28 consecutive days, while rats in the control group were injected 0.9% saline with same volume of vehicle. Body weight was measured everyday. Insulin sensitivity was determined by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Organ index, glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting insulin (FINS), hepatic glycogen, hydroxyproline (HYP) and liver function were detected at the end of the treatment. Area under the curve (AUC) for OGTT was calculated. Liver and pancreas histology were determined by histopathological examination with hematoxylin and eosin staining (HE), Sirius Red staining and Masson's trichrome staining, respectively. Hepatic expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and collagen (Col I) were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

Compared with the model group, Sal B significantly increased body and liver weight, liver-body ratio, glucose infusion rate (GIR), FPG, FINS levels and hepatic glycogen at the end of administration (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Meanwhile, Sal B significantly decreased AUC for OGTT, spleen weight, spleen-body ratio, aminotransferase and HYP level (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Sal B was also effective in alleviating necrosis of liver tissue, suppressing fibrosis progression and inhibiting the expression of α-SMA and Col I in liver. Compared with the metformin group, Sal B had advantages in ameliorating FPG, hepatic glycogen, spleen weight, organ index, liver function and cirrhosis (P<0.05). Metformin increased insulin sensitivity more potently than Sal B (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Sal B could improve glucose metabolism in cirrhotic rats by protecting hepatic glycogen reserve, increasing insulin sensitivity, and alleviating pancreatic morphology abnormalities. Sal B was clinically potential in preventing glucose metabolism anomalies accompanied with cirrhosis.

Current Concepts in Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Liver Disease: Clinical Outcomes, Hepatitis C Virus Association, and Therapy

Hereditary type 2 diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for chronic liver disease, and ~30 % of patients with liver cirrhosis develop diabetes. Diabetes mellitus has been associated with cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus liver infection, can aggravate the course the liver infection, and can induce a lower sustained response to antiviral treatment. Evidences that HCV may induce metabolic and autoimmune disturbances leading to hypobetalipoproteinemia, steatosis, insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, thyroid disease, and gonadal dysfunction have been found. Prospective studies have demonstrated that diabetes increases the risk of liver complications and death in patients with cirrhosis. However, treatment of diabetes in these patients is complex, as antidiabetic drugs can promote hypoglycemia and lactic acidosis. There have been few therapeutic studies evaluating antidiabetic treatments in patients with liver cirrhosis published to date; thus, the optimal treatment for diabetes and the impact of treatment on morbidity and mortality are not clearly known. As numbers of patients with chronic liver disease and diabetes mellitus are increasing, largely because of the global epidemics of obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, evaluation of treatment options is becoming more important. This review discusses new concepts on hepatogenous diabetes, the diabetes mellitus–hepatitis C virus association, and clinical implications of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic liver disease. In addition, the effectiveness and safety of old and new antidiabetic drugs, including incretin-based therapies, will be described.

The treatment of diabetes mellitus of patients with chronic liver disease

About 80% of patients with liver cirrhosis may have glucose metabolism disorders, 30% show overt diabetes mellitus (DM). Prospective studies have demonstrated that DM is associated with an increased risk of hepatic complications and death in patients with liver cirrhosis. DM might contribute to liver damage by promoting inflammation and fibrosis through an increase in mitochondrial oxidative stress mediated by adipokines. Based on the above mentioned the effective control of hyperglycemia may have a favorable impact on the evolution of these patients. However, only few therapeutic studies have evaluated the effectiveness and safety of antidiabetic drugs and the impact of the treatment of DM on morbidity and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. In addition, oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin may produce hypoglycemia and lactic acidosis, as most of these agents are metabolized by the liver. This review discusses the clinical implications of DM in patients with chronic liver disease. In addition the effectiveness and safety of old, but particularly the new antidiabetic drugs will be described based on pharmacokinetic studies and chronic administration to patients. Recent reports regarding the use of the SGLT2 inhibitors as well as the new incretin-based therapies such as injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and oral inhibitors of dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) will be discussed. The establishment of clear guidelines for the management of diabetes in patients with CLD is strongly required.