Highlights from the Fourth Biennial Strategies for an HIV Cure Meeting, 10–12 October 2018, Bethesda, MD, USA

Trispecific antibody targeting HIV-1 and T cells activates and eliminates latently-infected cells in HIV/SHIV infections

Agents that can simultaneously activate latent HIV, increase immune activation and enhance the killing of latently-infected cells represent promising approaches for HIV cure. Here, we develop and evaluate a trispecific antibody (Ab), N6/αCD3-αCD28, that targets three independent proteins: (1) the HIV envelope via the broadly reactive CD4-binding site Ab, N6; (2) the T cell antigen CD3; and (3) the co-stimulatory molecule CD28. We find that the trispecific significantly increases antigen-specific T-cell activation and cytokine release in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Co-culturing CD4+ with autologous CD8+ T cells from ART-suppressed HIV+ donors with N6/αCD3-αCD28, results in activation of latently-infected cells and their elimination by activated CD8+ T cells. This trispecific antibody mediates CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation in non-human primates and is well tolerated in vivo. This HIV-directed antibody therefore merits further development as a potential intervention for the eradication of latent HIV infection.

The Intact Non-Inducible Latent HIV-1 Reservoir is Established In an In Vitro Primary TCM Cell Model of Latency

The establishment of HIV-1 latency has hindered an HIV-1 cure. "Shock and Kill" strategies to target this reservoir aim to induce the latent provirus with latency reversing agents (LRAs). However, recent studies have shown that the majority of the intact HIV-1 viral reservoir found in ART-suppressed HIV infected individuals is not inducible. We sought to understand whether this non-inducible reservoir is established, and thus able to be studied, in an in vitro primary T_CM model of latency. Furthermore, we wanted to expand this model system to include R5-tropic and non-B subtype viruses. To that end, we generated our T_CM model of latency with an R5 subtype B virus, AD8 and an R5 subtype C virus, MJ4. Our results demonstrate that both intact and defective proviruses are generated in this model. Less than 50% of intact proviruses are inducible regardless of viral strain in the context of maximal stimulation through the TCR or with different clinically relevant LRAs including the HDAC inhibitors SAHA and MS-275, the PKC agonist Ingenol 3,20-dibenzoate or the SMAC mimetic AZD-5582. Our findings suggest that current LRA strategies are insufficient to effectively reactivate intact latent HIV-1 proviruses in primary CD4 T_CM cells and that the mechanisms involved in the generation of the non-inducible HIV-1 reservoir can be studied using this primary in vitro model.Importance: HIV-1 establishes a latent reservoir that persists under antiretroviral therapy. Antiretroviral therapy is able to stop the spread of the virus and the progression of the disease but does not target this latent reservoir. If antiretroviral therapy is stopped, the virus is able to resume replication and the disease progresses. Recently, it has been demonstrated that most of the latent reservoir capable of generating replication competent virus cannot be induced in the laboratory setting. However, the mechanisms that influence the generation of this intact and non-inducible latent reservoir are still under investigation. Here we demonstrate the generation of defective, intact and intact non-inducible latent HIV-1 in a T_CM model of latency using different HIV-1 strains. Thus, the mechanisms which control inducibility can be studied using this primary cell model of latency, which may accelerate our understanding of the latent reservoir and the development of curative strategies.

TLR7 agonist, N6-LS and PGT121 delayed viral rebound in SHIV-infected macaques after antiretroviral therapy interruption

Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist and PGT121 (broadly neutralizing antibody, bnAb) administration previously delayed viral rebound and induced SHIV remission. We evaluated the impact of GS-986 (TLR7 agonist) and dual bnAbs on viral rebound after antiretroviral therapy (ART) interruption. Rhesus macaques inoculated with SHIV-1157ipd3N4 were initiated on daily suppressive ART from Day 14 post SHIV inoculation. Active arm animals (n = 8) received GS-986, N6-LS and PGT121 after plasma viral suppression, starting from week 14. GS-986 induced immune activation and SHIV-specific T cell responses but not viral expression in all the active arm animals. After ART interruption, median time to viral rebound was 6 weeks in the active and 3 weeks in the control arm (p = 0.024). In this animal model, the administration of the combination of GS-986 and dual bnAbs was associated with a modest delay in viral rebound. This strategy should be further evaluated to better understand the underlying mechanisms for the induction of virus-specific immune responses and delay in viral rebound.

We evaluated the impact of TLR7 agonist (GS-986) and two broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) targeting different regions of the HIV envelope (CD4 binding site by N6-LS and V3 glycan by PGT121) in delaying viral rebound during ART interruption in rhesus macaques that were initiated on viral suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) 14 days post SHIV-1157ipd3N4 infection. We found that the combination of TLR7 agonist and dual bnAbs delayed viral rebound after ART interruption by 2-fold (from 3 wks in the control arm to 6 wks in the active arm, p = 0.024). This encouraging result independently validated prior findings of delay in viral rebound with TLR7 agonist and a single bnAb (PGT121) by Borducchi et al, Nature, 2018. Importantly, findings were in concurrence despite the performance of the study by an independent research group, in a different macaque colony, with a different strain of SHIV. Moreover, this study intentionally deferred ART initiation by a week, i.e. on day 14 post inoculation to mirror what is logistically feasible in acute HIV infection. Thus, data from this study may potentially more closely reflect the impact of the combination of TLR7 agonist and dual bnAbs on viral rebound in HIV-infected individuals.

"I would really want to know that they had my back": Transgender women's perceptions of HIV cure-related research in the United States

Forty-four percent of Black transgender women are living with HIV, and many face challenges with HIV care engagement. An HIV cure has much to offer this population, however little HIV cure-related research has included them. We conducted 19 face-to-face in-depth interviews with 10 Black transgender women living with HIV. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using content analysis. Our interview guide contained three categories: 1) perceptions of HIV cure-related research and participation, 2) perceptions of HIV treatment and treatment interruptions, and 3) considerations for transgender women and HIV cure-related research. Salient themes included skepticism about HIV cure strategies and limited benefits compared with an undetectable viral load. Willingness to interrupt HIV treatment for research was low and linked to being able to go back on the same HIV treatment without consequence when the study ended. Concerns about being a test subject and perceptions of risks versus benefits of various strategies also affected willingness to take part in HIV cure-related research. Centering the dignity and autonomy of research participants as well as building upon and supporting existing social networks were identified as important facilitators for engaging Black transgender women in HIV cure-related research. Specific to Black transgender women, other concerns included the desire for gender-affirming research staff, community-building among transgender women, and safety issues associated with risk of transphobic violence when traveling to study visits. Participants stressed the importance of HIV cure-related researchers providing accessible and complete information and expressing genuine care and concern for transgender communities.

HIV-1 Latency and Latency Reversal: Does Subtype Matter?

Cells that are latently infected with HIV-1 preclude an HIV-1 cure, as antiretroviral therapy does not target this latent population. HIV-1 is highly genetically diverse, with over 10 subtypes and numerous recombinant forms circulating worldwide. In spite of this vast diversity, much of our understanding of latency and latency reversal is largely based on subtype B viruses. As such, most of the development of cure strategies targeting HIV-1 are solely based on subtype B. It is currently assumed that subtype does not influence the establishment or reactivation of latent viruses. However, this has not been conclusively proven one way or the other. A better understanding of the factors that influence HIV-1 latency in all viral subtypes will help develop therapeutic strategies that can be applied worldwide. Here, we review the latest literature on subtype-specific factors that affect viral replication, pathogenesis, and, most importantly, latency and its reversal.