RSV prevention in infancy and asthma in later life

The Impact of Palivizumab for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prophylaxis on Preschool Childhood Asthma

BACKGROUND

The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections in infants and is associated with an increased risk of asthma development. Palivizumab, an RSV prophylactic, reduces RSV-related hospitalizations in high-risk infants, but its impact on long-term asthma outcomes remains unclear. This study compares asthma-related healthcare utilization in preschool children born prematurely between those who received Palivizumab (the Prophylaxis (+) group) and those who did not (the Prophylaxis (-) group).

METHODS

This nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study utilized data from Clalit Healthcare Services in Israel. The study included children born between 32 + 6 and 34 + 6 weeks of gestational age from 2011 to 2018. Descriptive analysis, univariate analysis, and multivariate logistic regression were performed to compare the Prophylaxis (+) and the Prophylaxis (-) groups.

RESULTS

In total, 4503 children were included, with 3287 in the Prophylaxis (+) group and 1216 in the Prophylaxis (-) group. Palivizumab administration was associated with reduced hospitalizations for RSV bronchiolitis (1.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.003). However, no significant differences were observed in multivariate analysis for long-term asthma outcomes, including asthma diagnosis (OR = 1.04, CI = 0.84-1.30, p = 0.7) or emergency department visits for asthma (OR = 0.79, CI = 0.54-1.17, p = 0.2). Similarly, Palivizumab administration was not associated with the purchase of short-acting beta-agonists (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.98-1.32, p = 0.084), inhaled corticosteroids (OR = 1.1, CI = 0.93-1.32, p = 0.3), or oral corticosteroids (OR = 1.09, CI = 0.94-1.26, p = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

While Palivizumab effectively reduces RSV acute bronchiolitis in preterm infants, it does not significantly impact long-term preschool asthma-related healthcare utilization.

Quality of life burden on United States infants and caregivers due to lower respiratory tract infection and adjusting for selective testing: Pilot prospective observational study

Background and Aims

Policymakers need data about the burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) among infants. This study estimates quality of life (QoL) for otherwise healthy term US infants with RSV-LRTI and their caregivers, previously limited to premature and hospitalized infants, and corrects for selective testing.

Methods

The study enrolled infants <1 year with a clinically diagnosed LRTI encounter between January and May 2021. Using an established 0-100 scale, the 36 infants' and caregivers' QoL at enrollment and quality-adjusted life year losses per 1000 LRTI episodes (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]/1000) were validated and analyzed. Regression analyses examined predictors of RSV-testing and RSV-positivity, creating modeled positives.

Results

Mean QoL at enrollment in outpatient (n = 11) LRTI-tested infants (66.4) was lower than that in not-tested LRTI infants (79.6, p = 0.096). For outpatient LRTI infants (n = 23), median QALYs/1000 losses were 9.8 and 0.25 for their caregivers. RSV-positive outpatient LRTI infants (n = 6) had significantly milder QALYs/1000 losses (7.0) than other LRTI-tested infants (n = 5)(21.8, p = 0.030). Visits earlier in the year were more likely to be RSV-positive than later visits (p = 0.023). Modeled RSV-positivity (51.9%) was lower than the observed rate (55.0%). Infants' and caregivers' QALYs/1000 loss were positively correlated (rho = 0.34, p = 0.046), indicating that infants perceived as sicker imposed greater burdens on caregivers.

Conclusions

The overall median QALYs/1000 losses for LRTI (9.0) and RSV-LRTI (5.6) in US infants are substantial, with additional losses for their caregivers (0.25 and 0.20, respectively). These losses extend equally to outpatient episodes. This study is the first reporting QALY losses for infants with LRTI born at term or presenting in nonhospitalized settings, and their caregivers.

Holy Grail: the journey towards disease modification in asthma

At present, there is no cure for asthma, and treatment typically involves therapies that prevent or reduce asthma symptoms, without modifying the underlying disease. A “disease-modifying” treatment can be classed as able to address the pathogenesis of a disease, preventing progression or leading to a long-term reduction in symptoms. Such therapies have been investigated and approved in other indications, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis and immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic disease. Asthma's heterogeneous nature has made the discovery of similar therapies in asthma more difficult, although novel therapies (e.g. biologics) may have the potential to exhibit disease-modifying properties. To investigate the disease-modifying potential of a treatment, study design considerations can be made, including: appropriate end-point selection, length of trial, age of study population (key differences between adults/children in physiology, pathology and drug metabolism) and comorbidities in the patient population. Potential future focus areas for disease-modifying treatments in asthma include early assessments (e.g. to detect patterns of remodelling) and interventions for patients genetically susceptible to asthma, interventions to prevent virally induced asthma and therapies to promote a healthy microbiome. This review explores the pathophysiology of asthma, the disease-modifying potential of current asthma therapies and the direction future research may take to achieve full disease remission or prevention.

Asthma is a complex, heterogeneous disease, which currently has no cure; this review explores the disease-modifying potential of asthma therapies and the direction future research may take to achieve disease remission or prevention.https://bit.ly/31AxYou

Long-Term Respiratory Consequences of Early-Life Respiratory Viral Infections: A Pragmatic Approach to Fundamental Questions

Early-life viral infection can have profound effects on the developing lung and immune systems, both important in asthma development. For decades, research has aimed to establish whether there is a causal link between these viral infections as an exposure and asthma later in childhood. Establishing causality will remain important, but new insights regarding early-life viral infection as an exposure, the recognition of asthma as a heterogeneous outcome, and the shared genetic susceptibility to both suggest a refocus from answering the theoretical question of causality toward additional pragmatic approaches focusing on improving patient outcomes across the spectrum of respiratory disease. This Clinical Commentary reviews the evidence on the consequences of early-life viral infection and aims to look beyond the question of causality, suggesting a research agenda specifically aimed at what matters for human development, and for the quality of life of current and future patients with wheezing disorders.

T cells in severe childhood asthma

Severe asthma in children is a debilitating condition that accounts for a disproportionately large health and economic burden of asthma. Reasons for the lack of a response to standard anti-inflammatory therapies remain enigmatic. Work in the last decade has shed new light on the heterogeneous nature of asthma, and the varied immunopathologies of severe disease, which are leading to new treatment approaches for the individual patient. However, most studies to date that explored the immune landscape of the inflamed lower airways have focused on adults. T cells are pivotal to the inception and persistence of inflammatory processes in the diseased lungs, despite a contemporary shift in focus to immune events at the epithelial barrier. This article outlines current knowledge on the types of T cells and related cell types that are implicated in severe asthma. The potential for environmental exposures and other inflammatory cues to condition the immune environment of the lung in early life to favour pathogenic T cells and steroid resistance is discussed. The contributions of T cells and their cytokines to inflammatory processes and treatment resistance are also considered, with an emphasis on new observations in children that argue against conventional type 1 and type 2 T cell paradigms. Finally, the ability for new technologies to revolutionize our understanding of T cells in severe childhood asthma, and to guide future treatment strategies that could mitigate this disease, is highlighted.