Extracorporeal haemoadsorption: does the evidence support its routine use in critical care?

Cytokine Hemoadsorption versus Standard Care in Cardiac Surgery Using the Oxiris Membrane: The OXICARD Single-center Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiac surgery can lead to dysregulation with a proinflammatory state, resulting in adverse outcomes. Hemadsorption using the AN-69 membrane (Oxiris membrane, Baxter, USA) has the properties to chelate inflammatory cytokines. The authors hypothesized that in patients at high risk of inflammation, the use of the Oxiris membrane could decrease inflammation, preserve endothelial function, and improve postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

The authors conducted a randomized single-center study at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France). The study population consisted of adult patients admitted for scheduled cardiac surgery with an expected cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time greater than 90 min. The patients were allocated to either the standard group or the Oxiris group. The intervention consisted of using the Oxiris membrane on a Prismaflex device (Baxter, USA) at a blood flow rate of 450 ml/min during CPB. The primary outcome was the assessment of microcirculation on day 1 after surgery by measuring sublingual microcirculation using the microvascular flow index. Microvascular flow index reflects the microcirculation flow type and is graded from 0 to 3 as follows: 0, no flow; 1, intermittent flow; 2, sluggish flow; 3, continuous flow. The secondary outcome was a composite adverse outcome within 30 days after surgery. Cytokines and endothelial biomarkers were measured in all patients at different time points. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

From October 2019 to November 2022, the study included 70 patients. Two patients were excluded from the Oxiris group: one patient did not undergo surgery, and one procedure was performed under deep hypothermia. The microvascular flow index did not differ between groups on day 1 from baseline: difference (95% CI) Oxiris minus standard at -0.17 (-0.44 to 0.10); P = 0.2. The occurrence of a composite adverse outcome did not significantly differ between groups (14 [42%] for the Oxiris group vs. 12 [35%] for the standard group; P = 0.7). The overall variation in cytokines and angiopoietins did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients scheduled for a cardiac surgery with prolonged CPB, the authors could not demonstrate the benefit on microcirculation and major cardiovascular events.

Editorial for the Special Issue "Infectious and Tropical Diseases: Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment"

For centuries, humans have faced the devastating wrath of outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics caused by infectious diseases [...].

Impact of Haemoadsorption Therapy on Short Term Mortality and Vasopressor Dependency in Severe Septic Shock with Acute Kidney Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, remains a major challenge in ICUs. This study evaluated whether combining haemoadsorption therapy with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) reduces ICU and short-term mortality in patients with severe septic shock and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring CRRT. Methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted at Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel, from January 2018 to February 2024. Data were collected from ICU patients with severe septic shock and AKI requiring CRRT. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving haemoadsorption therapy with CRRT and those receiving CRRT alone. Primary and secondary endpoints included ICU, 30 and 60-day mortality, vasopressor dependency index (VDI), and lactate levels. Results: Out of 545 patients with septic shock, 133 developed AKI requiring CRRT, and 76 met the inclusion criteria. The haemoadsorption group (n = 47) showed significant reductions in blood lactate levels and VDI after 24 h compared to the CRRT alone group (n = 29). ICU mortality was significantly lower in the haemoadsorption group (34.0% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.008), as was 30 and 60-day mortality (34.0% vs. 62.1%, p = 0.02, and 48.9% vs. 75.9%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed haemoadsorption therapy as independently associated with lower ICU and 30-day but not 60-day mortality. Conclusions: Haemoadsorption therapy combined with CRRT in patients with severe septic shock and AKI requiring CRRT is associated with improved lactate clearance, reduced vasopressor requirements, and lower ICU and 30-day mortality. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Macrophage activation syndrome in Sepsis: from pathogenesis to clinical management

BACKGROUND

Sepsis represents a significant global health and hygiene challenge. Excessive activation of macrophages in sepsis can result in certain patients displaying characteristics akin to those observed in Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS). MAS represents a grave immune system disorder characterized by persistent and severe inflammation within the body. In the context of sepsis, MAS presents atypically, leading some researchers to refer to it as Macrophage Activation-Like Syndrome (MALS). However, there are currently no effective treatment measures for this situation. The purpose of this article is to explore potential treatment methods for sepsis-associated MALS.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to synthesize the specific pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment strategies of MAS to investigate potential therapeutic approaches for sepsis-associated MALS.

METHOD

We searched major databases (including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar etc.) for literature encompassing macrophage activation syndrome and sepsis up to Mar 2024 and combined with studies found in the reference lists of the included studies.

CONCLUSION

We have synthesized the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of MALS in sepsis, and then summarized the diagnostic criteria and the effects of various treatment modalities utilized in patients with MAS or MALS. In both scenarios, heterogeneous treatment responses resulting from identical treatment approaches were observed. The determination of whether the patient is genuinely experiencing MALS significantly impacts the ultimate outcomes of therapeutic efficacy. In order to tackle this concern, additional clinical trials and research endeavors are imperative.

Endothelial Protection and Improved Micro- and Macrocirculation with Hemoadsorption in Critically Ill Patients

A dysregulated immune response is associated with an excessive release of cytokines that can lead to systemic vasoplegia and vasoplegic shock with the development of multiorgan failure that is associated with an increased risk of dying. Under physiological circumstances, the endothelium and the glycocalyx are responsible for maintaining vascular tone, capillary permeability, and hemostasis, and controlling inflammation. In hyperinflammation, the endothelium and glycocalyx become damaged due to the excessive production of certain toxic proteins, along with an overwhelming release of cytokines. It has been shown in both in vitro animal experiments and in humans that extracorporeal hemoadsorption can reduce circulating levels of cytokines and may also remove toxic proteins that directly take part in endothelium and glycocalyx damage. The current review aims to summarize current knowledge, put recent findings into context, and introduce the hypothesis of "endothelial protection with hemoadsorption" in critically ill patients.

The COSMOS Registry of CytoSorb Hemoadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: Protocol for an International, Prospective Registry

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal blood purification with CytoSorb has been increasingly used as an adjunctive therapy in several hyperinflammatory critical care conditions, as well as to remove elevated levels of myoglobin or bilirubin in patients with rhabdomyolysis or liver failure. Despite the increasing worldwide use of hemoadsorption, data from large international multicenter studies are still lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The COSMOS (CytoSorb Treatment Of Critically Ill Patients) registry is a company-sponsored registry by CytoSorbents Corporation and CytoSorbents Medical Inc. and will provide a data repository and reporting infrastructure for the surveillance of CytoSorb use in real-world critical care settings in an unselected, critically ill patient population. The gathered data will serve as a comprehensive resource to assess the effects of such therapy on patients' management.

METHODS

The international COSMOS registry is collecting prospective data for patients treated with CytoSorb during routine care in various critical care indications, based on the decision of the treating physicians. Data are collected at baseline, during CytoSorb therapy, 24 hours thereafter, at discharge from the intensive care unit and the hospital, and on day 90. Key outcomes assessed include change in inflammatory biomarkers, vasopressor requirements, fluid balance, organ function and organ support, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, occurrence of adverse events, and mortality.

RESULTS

The COSMOS registry started with the inclusion of the first patient on July 15, 2022, and is now actively enrolling in 4 countries (Germany, Spain, Portugal, and Italy), with plans to expand to other countries outside of Europe. An initial readout is planned for presentation at an international Critical Care conference in 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

The COSMOS registry is intended to provide comprehensive real-world data on patient outcomes with CytoSorb in various critical care indications, thereby contributing to optimization of patient selection, timing of initiation, and dosing of hemoadsorption treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05146336; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05146336.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/55880.

Analysis of Trends and Influencing Factors of Cytokine-Adsorbing Therapies: A Nationwide Ecological Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Cytokine-adsorption therapy has garnered attention as a potential treatment for conditions such as sepsis, although supporting evidence remains limited. Consequently, its utilization is expected to vary significantly across regions. To date, no ecological studies have investigated this regional heterogeneity.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine temporal trends in the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with cytokine-adsorbing hemofilters and polymyxin-B immobilized fiber-direct hemoperfusion (PMX-DHP), as well as the spatial distribution of both across Japan's 47 prefectures.

METHODS

This ecological study analyzed National Database (NDB) open data. A longitudinal analysis from 2016 to 2022 assessed temporal trends in the use of adsorption membranes. A cross-sectional analysis of the 2022 data utilized Moran's I statistic to evaluate the spatial autocorrelation of adsorption therapy. To examine the relationship between the two types of adsorption therapy, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient and conducted a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The longitudinal analysis revealed no significant change in the proportion of cytokine-adsorbing hemofilter use, while PMX-DHP use showed a decreasing trend over the seven-year period. Cross-sectional analysis indicated spatial autocorrelation for both PMX-DHP (Moran's I: 0.34, P < 0.001) and cytokine-adsorption filter use (Moran's I: 0.24, P < 0.001). Univariate analysis (R = -0.29, P = 0.0453) and multivariate analysis (estimated coefficient: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.06-2.49, P = 0.045) demonstrated that higher usage rates of cytokine-adsorbing blood filters were associated with higher PMX-DHP usage rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a declining trend in PMX-DHP use and an association between PMX-DHP and cytokine-adsorbing hemofilter utilization. These findings suggest that physicians' preferences and perceptions regarding cytokine-adsorption therapy may influence its use. Further research with individual patient data is warranted to confirm these findings.

Cytokine adsorption in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (CYTOHEP): A single center, open-label, three-arm, randomized, controlled intervention pilot trial

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of bilirubin reduction by hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, single-center, open-label, controlled pilot trial. Patients with ACLF, acute kidney injury, and serum bilirubin ≥5 mg/dL were assigned 1:1:1 to one of three study groups (CRRT with or without hemoadsorption, no CRRT). In the hemoadsorption group, the CytoSorb adsorber was incorporated into the CRRT system, replaced after 12, 24, and 48 h, and removed after 72 h. The primary endpoint was the serum bilirubin level after 72 h.

RESULTS

CYTOHEP was terminated early due to difficulties in recruiting patients and ethical concerns. Three of 9 patients (33%) were treated in each group. Comparing the three groups, mean bilirubin levels after 72 h were lower by -8.0 mg/dL in the "CRRT with hemoadsorption" group compared to "CRRT without hemoadsorption" (95% CI, -21.3 to 5.3 mg/dL; p = 0.17). The corresponding mean difference between "CRRT without hemoadsorption" and "no CRRT" was -1.4 mg/dL (95% CI, -14.2 to 11.5 mg/dL; p = 0.78). Comparing "CRRT with hemoadsorption" and "no CRRT," it was -9.4 mg/dL (95% CI, -20.8 to 2.1 mg/dL; p = 0.0854). Only 1/9 patients (11%, "no CRRT" group) survived day 30 after study inclusion but died on day 89. IL-6, liver function parameters, and clinical scores were similar between the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CYTOHEP failed to demonstrate that extracorporeal hemoadsorption combined with CRRT can reduce serum bilirubin in ACLF patients with acute kidney failure.

Extracorporeal Elimination of Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Modulators by the Cytokine Adsorber CytoSorb® in Patients with Hyperinflammation: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in critically ill patients with sepsis leads to endothelial dysfunction resulting in cardiocirculatory insufficiency. Their extracorporeal elimination using the cytokine adsorber CytoSorb® (CS) (adsorption of especially hydrophobic molecules < 60 kDa) might be promising, but data about the adsorption capacity as well as a potential harmful adsorption of anti-inflammatory cytokines are missing so far.

METHODS

The prospective Cyto-SOLVE-study included 15 patients with sepsis or other hyperinflammatory conditions (interleukin 6 > 500 pg/ml), continuous kidney replacement therapy, and the application of CS. Various cytokines and chemokines were measured pre- and post-CS as well as in patients' blood at predefined timepoints. Significant changes in the concentrations were detected with the Wilcoxon test with associated samples. Clearance of the adsorber (ml/min) was calculated with: b l o o d f l o w ∗ c o n c e n t r a t i o n p r e - p o s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n pre . RESULTS: Most of the inflammatory mediators showed a high initial extracorporeal clearance of 70-100 ml/min after CS installation, which dropped quickly to 10-30 ml/min after 6 h of treatment. No difference in clearance was observed between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Despite extracorporeal adsorption, a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the blood concentration after 6 h was only observed for the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factorα (TNF-α) (median 284 vs. 230 pg/ml), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (median 294 vs. 252 pg/ml), macrophage inflammatory protein 1a (MIP-1a) (median 11.1 vs. 9.0 pg/ml), and regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) (median 811 vs. 487 pg/ml) as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokines interleukin 4 (median 9.3 vs. 6.4 pg/ml), interleukin 10 (median 88 vs. 56 pg/ml), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (median 177 vs. 104 pg/ml). A significant (p < 0.05) decrease in patients' blood after 12 h was only detected for interleukin 10.

CONCLUSIONS

CS can adsorb pro- as well as anti-inflammatory mediators with no relevant difference regarding the adsorption rate. A fast saturation of the adsorber resulted in a rapid decrease of the clearance. The potential clinical benefit or harm of this unspecific cytokine adsorption needs to be evaluated in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04913298, registration date June 4, 2021.

The Effect of Cytokine Adsorption on Leukocyte and Platelet Activation after Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BACKGROUND

 Post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) is a frequent complication following successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation and correlates with poor outcome. PCAS is characterized by an excessive inflammatory response to whole-body ischemia and reperfusion. Cytokine adsorption was suggested as an adjunctive treatment option for the removal of cytokines from the patients' blood to restore the physiological equilibrium of pro- and anti-inflammatory activity and thus mitigate hemodynamic instability and end-organ complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 To better understand the cellular effects of cytokine adsorption in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) after in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, we compared the activation status of neutrophils, monocytes, and platelets as well as the formation of platelet-leukocyte complexes in intravenous whole blood samples from an exploratory subgroup (n = 24) from the randomized CYTER study.

RESULT

 At 48 hours after initiation of ECPR, flow cytometry analyses did neither reveal significant differences in neutrophil (CD11b, CD66b, L-selectin, and PSGL-1) and monocyte (CD11b, L-selectin, and PSGL-1) surface molecule expression nor in circulating platelet-monocyte complexes between patients receiving cytokine adsorption and those without.

CONCLUSION

 Data did not show a relevant effect of cytokine adsorption on neutrophil and monocyte activation during the first 48 hours after initiation of ECPR.

Ineffectiveness of hemoadsorption in large animals with abdominal sepsis: a randomized controlled porcine study

OBJECTIVES

The use of hemoadsorption (HA) has become popular in the treatment of vasoplegic states associated with massive cytokine release, including septic shock. However, this approach does not seem to be based on robust evidence, and it does not follow international guidelines. To understand the pathophysiological rationale and timing of HA, we conducted a large animal septic shock experiment.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized large-animal peritoneal septic shock experiment.

SETTING

Laboratory investigation.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-six anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented pigs randomly assigned into (1) sham-operated group with HA (SHAM, n = 5); (2) sepsis animals without HA (SEPSIS, n = 5); (3) sepsis group with HA at norepinephrine initiation (EARLY, n = 8); and (4) sepsis group with HA initiated at norepinephrine rate reaching 0.5 μg/kg/min (LATE, n = 8).

INTERVENTIONS

Peritoneal sepsis was induced by cultivated autologous feces inoculation. A CytoSorb cartridge (200 g) with a blood flow rate of 200 mL/min and heparin anticoagulation was used to perform HA. The animals received sedation and intensive organ support up to 48 h or until they experienced cardiovascular collapse.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic hemodynamics, multiple-organ functions, and immune-inflammatory response were measured at predefined periods. The HA treatment was not associated with any measurable benefit in terms of systemic hemodynamics and organ support. The systemic inflammatory markers were unaffected by any of the treatment timings. In contrast, the HA resulted in higher vasopressor load and decreased 36-h survival (5 animals in SHAM (100%), 4 (80%) in SEPSIS, 4 (57%) in EARLY, and 2 (25%) in LATE; p = 0.041). The HA exposure in healthy animals was associated with hemodynamic deterioration, systemic inflammatory response, and cytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large-animal-controlled fulminant sepsis study, the HA was unable to counteract the disease progression in the early or advanced septic shock phase. However, findings from the HA-exposed sham animals suggest potential safety concerns.

Hemoadsorption in Organ Preservation and Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Cytokine adsorption can resolve different complications characteristic of transplantation medicine, such as cytokine storm activation and blood ABO and immune incompatibilities. Cytokine adsorption is also performed for the treatment of various life-threatening conditions, such as endotoxic septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and cardiogenic shock, all potentially leading to adverse clinical outcomes during transplantation. After surgery, dysmetabolism and stress response limit successful graft survival and can lead to primary or secondary graft dysfunction. In this clinical context, and given that a major problem in transplant medicine is that the demand for organs far exceeds the supply, a technological innovation such as a hemoadsorption system could greatly contribute to increasing the number of usable organ donors. The objectives of this review are to describe the specific advantages and disadvantages of the application of cytokine adsorption in the context of transplantation and examine, before and/or after organ transplantation, the benefits of the addition of a cytokine adsorption therapy protocol.

Specific Clearance of Lipopolysaccharide from Blood Based on Peptide Bottlebrush Polymer for Sepsis Therapy

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the primary bacterial toxin that is vital to the pathogenesis and progression of sepsis associated with extremely high morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, specific clearance of LPS from circulating blood is highly challenging because of the structural complexity and its variation between/within bacterial species. Herein, a robust strategy based on phage display screening and hemocompatible peptide bottlebrush polymer design for specific clearance of targeted LPS from circulating blood is proposed. Using LPS extracted from Escherichia coli as an example, a novel peptide (HWKAVNWLKPWT) with high affinity (KD < 1.0 nм), specificity, and neutralization activity (95.9 ± 0.1%) against the targeted LPS is discovered via iterative affinity selection coupled with endotoxin detoxification screening. A hemocompatible bottlebrush polymer bearing the short peptide [poly(PEGMEA-co-PEP-1)] exhibits high LPS selectivity to reduce circulating LPS level from 2.63 ± 0.01 to 0.78 ± 0.05 EU mL-1 in sepsis rabbits via extracorporeal hemoperfusion (LPS clearance ratio > 70%), reversing the LPS-induced leukocytopenia and multiple organ damages significantly. This work provides a universal paradigm for developing a highly selective hemoadsorbent library fully covering the LPS family, which is promising to create a new era of precision medicine in sepsis therapy.

Haemoadsorption Combined with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Abdominal Sepsis: Case Report Series

In recent decades, multiple efforts have been made to identify targets and therapeutic measures in the host response to infection. Haemoadsorption, under the attractive theoretical premise of inflammatory response modulation through the adsorption of soluble inflammatory mediators, could have a place as an adjuvant therapy in septic patients. The development of new devices and the recent COVID-19 pandemic has renewed interest in this therapy. The aim of this report is to describe our experience in patients with abdominal sepsis for whom haemoadsorption with a neutral microporous resin column was added to conventional treatment and to describe its performance through patient cases in the absence of large randomised trials with this device. We present five patients with abdominal sepsis admitted to a Spanish intensive care unit in which haemoadsorption was used as adjuvant treatment. The key practical aspects of the treatment protocol have been used as a guide for conducting a multicentric study. Based on the experience gathered in these five cases, the potential benefit of haemoadsorption as adjuvant therapy in patients with abdominal sepsis with multiple organ failure after control of the source of infection and adequate treatment should be investigated. Likewise, it must be defined which patients can benefit from the therapy, the most appropriate biomarkers to guide the therapy, the ideal time of initiation and discontinuation, its potential side effects, and the interaction with other therapies, especially how such treatment affects the antibiotics levels.

Survival of Patients Treated With Extracorporeal Hemoadsorption and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From a Nation-Wide Registry

Extracorporeal hemoadsorption with the CytoSorb adsorber is increasingly being used during the past years. The use in combination with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is feasible, but frequency of its use and outcomes have not been assessed in larger cohorts. We analyzed all patients treated with veno-venous (VV) ECMO either with or without CytoSorb in Germany from 2017 to 2019. Data were retrieved from a nationwide claim dataset collected by the Research Data Center of the Federal Bureau of Statistics. During this three-year episode, 7,699 patients were treated with VV ECMO. Among these, the number of CytoSorb-treated patients constantly increased from 156 (6.6%) in 2017 to 299 (11.8%) in 2019. In this large cohort hemoadsorption with the CytoSorb adsorber was associated with higher mortality and increased treatment costs. Due to limited information in the dataset about the severity of disease comparison of outcomes of patients treated with and without CytoSorb has to be interpreted with caution. Further studies have to examine if this finding is due to a negative effect of hemoadsorption with the CytoSorb device or is rather to be attributed to disease severity.

[Hemoperfusion and plasmapheresis in the intensive care unit]

In addition to kidney replacement procedures, several other extracorporeal procedures are employed in the intensive care unit. Hemoperfusion with activated charcoal was the predominant treatment used for removal of toxins from the 1970s until the millennium. Nowadays, this treatment does no longer play a clinically meaningful role as even strongly protein-bound toxins can be removed by effective dialysis procedures in case poisoning. The concept of a cytokine adsorber was introduced 10 years ago, which is directed towards withstanding the cytokine storm. Despite negative data from prospective randomized controlled studies, its use is steadily increasing in Germany. A totally different treatment concept is the biomimetic pathogen adsorber, which removes bacteria, viruses and fungi from the bloodstream by binding to immobilized heparin. Whether this rapid reduction of the pathogen load translates into an improvement of clinically relevant endpoints is unclear, as prospective randomized controlled studies are lacking. For the early hours of septic shock a very old procedure, plasmapheresis, has recently regained interest. The results of two large randomized controlled studies in this setting from Europe and Canada will become available in 2025/2026. The rationale to use plasma exchange in early sepsis is that this procedure not only removes cytokines but also replenishes reduced levels of protective factors, such as angiopoietin‑1, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS-13) and protein C, if fresh plasma is used as exchange fluid. All afore mentioned procedures do not only have a different mode of action but are also used at seperate time points of bloodstream infections and/or sepsis.

The Techniques of Blood Purification in the Treatment of Sepsis and Other Hyperinflammatory Conditions

Even in the absence of strong indications deriving from clinical studies, the removal of mediators is increasingly used in septic shock and in other clinical conditions characterized by a hyperinflammatory response. Despite the different underlying mechanisms of action, they are collectively indicated as blood purification techniques. Their main categories include blood- and plasma processing procedures, which can run in a stand-alone mode or, more commonly, in association with a renal replacement treatment. The different techniques and principles of function, the clinical evidence derived from multiple clinical investigations, and the possible side effects are reviewed and discussed along with the persisting uncertainties about their precise role in the therapeutic armamentarium of these syndromes.

Effect of extracorporeal hemoadsorption in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A narrative review

COVID-19 has been affecting the world unprecedentedly and will remain widely prevalent due to its elusive pathophysiological mechanism and the continuous emergence of new variants. Critically ill patients with COVID-19 are commonly associated with cytokine storm, multiple organ dysfunction, and high mortality. To date, growing evidence has shown that extracorporeal hemoadsorption can exert its adjuvant effect to standard of care by regulating immune homeostasis, reducing viremia, and decreasing endotoxin activity in critically ill COVID-19 cases. However, the selection of various hemofilters, timing of initiation and termination of hemoadsorption therapy, anticoagulation management of extracorporeal circuits, identification of target subgroups, and ultimate survival benefit remain controversial. The purpose of this narrative review is to comprehensively summarize the rationale for the use of hemoadsorption in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and to gather the latest clinical evidence in this field.

Hämoperfusion und Plasmapherese auf der Intensivstation

Neben Nierenersatzverfahren werden auf der Intensivstation mehrere andere extrakorporale Verfahren eingesetzt. In den 1970er- bis 2000er-Jahren stand die Hämoperfusion mit Aktivkohlekapseln zur Entfernung von Toxinen im Vordergrund. Dies ist mittlerweile aufgrund der effektiven Dialyseverfahren, die im Vergiftungsfall auch stark proteingebundene Toxine entfernen, fast bedeutungslos geworden. Vor 10 Jahren erlebte ein Zytokinadsorber die Markteinführung, der darauf gerichtet ist, den „Zytokinsturm“ zu überstehen. Dieser erfreut sich trotz ernüchternder Daten aus prospektiven, randomisierten, kontrollierten Studien wachsender Beliebtheit. Ein gänzlich anderes Therapiekonzept ist der biomimetische Pathogenadsorber, der Bakterien, Viren und Pilze durch Bindung an immobilisiertes Heparin aus dem Blutstrom entfernt. Ob sich diese schnelle Reduktion der Pathogenlast in eine Verbesserung klinisch relevanter Endpunkte übersetzt, ist unklar, da hier prospektive, randomisierte und kontrollierte Studien gänzlich fehlen. Für ein sehr altes Verfahren, nämlich die Plasmapherese, werden wir für die Frühphase der Sepsis bis zum Jahr 2025/2026 Ergebnisse aus 2 großen randomisierten, kontrollierten Studien aus Europa und Kanada erhalten. Neben der Entfernung von Zytokinen erhofft man sich durch die Verwendung von Frischplasma als Austauschflüssigkeit auch das Wiederauffüllen reduzierter protektiver Faktoren wie Angiopoietin 1, ADAMTS13 („a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13“) und Protein C. Alle genannten Verfahren funktionieren nicht nur unterschiedlich, sondern werden auch zu unterschiedlichen Zeitpunkten der Blutstrominfektion/Sepsis eingesetzt.

Mortality and adverse events of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The effects and safety of extracorporeal hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in critically ill patients with inflammatory conditions are controversial.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized-controlled trials to assess the mortality and safety of CytoSorb® therapy in critically ill patients with inflammatory conditions. Electronic databases were searched up to April 2022. The primary outcome was mortality at longest follow-up and secondary outcomes included various adverse event (AE) outcomes. Conflict of interest and funding of each trial were assessed. We calculated relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Fourteen published (n = 764) and 4 unpublished (n = 111) trials were included. Eight trials were performed in medical ICU patients and 10 in complex cardiac surgery. Ten trials had significant industrial funding or an author conflict of interest. Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® was associated with higher mortality at latest follow-up (16 trials, n = 807, 120 of 402 [29.85%] patients in the CytoSorb® group vs. 98 of 405 [24.20%] patients in the control group, RR = 1.24 [95% CI, 1.04-1.49], p = .02, [TSA-adjusted CI, 0.92-1.68]) and at 30-days or in-hospital (11 trials, n = 727; RR = 1.41 [95% CI, 1.06-1.88], p = .02, [TSA-adjusted CI, 0.44-4.62]). Only one trial reported the definition of adverse event, while detailed results were reported in 3 trials; the risk of adverse events was not higher with CytoSorb®. Certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low.

CONCLUSION

Low certainty of evidence showed that the use of CytoSorb® might increase mortality in critically ill patients with inflammatory conditions. Adverse events were frequent but underreported and not systematically evaluated. Industrial funding and conflict of interest were common. Considerable uncertainty about the findings does not allow firm conclusions and suggests a need for high-quality randomized trials to clarify mortality and adverse events related to CytoSorb®.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® have been used in critically ill patients despite lack of high quality data from RCTs suggesting any patient-important benefits. The findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests an increased risk of adverse events including mortality. With no apparent benefits and at the same time risk of harm, use of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in daily clinical practice cannot be recommended at this time.