Efficacy and safety of itacitinib versus placebo in combination with corticosteroids for initial treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (GRAVITAS-301): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Mini-dose methotrexate combined with methylprednisolone for the initial treatment of acute GVHD: a multicentre, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent unmet need for effective initial treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) adding to the standard first-line therapy with corticosteroids after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

METHODS

We performed a multicentre, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study. Eligible patients (aged 15 years or older, had received allo-HSCT for a haematological malignancy, developed aGVHD, and received no previous therapies for aGVHD) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 5 mg/m2 MTX on Days 1, 3, or 8 and then combined with corticosteroids or corticosteroids alone weekly.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) on Day 10. A total of 157 patients were randomly assigned to receive either MTX plus corticosteroids (n = 78; MTX group) or corticosteroids alone (n = 79; control group). The Day 10 ORR was 97% for the MTX group and 81% for the control group (p = .005). Among patients with mild aGVHD, the Day 10 ORR was 100% for the MTX group and 86% for the control group (p = .001). The 1-year estimated failure-free survival was 69% for the MTX group and 41% for the control group (p = .002). There were no differences in treatment-related adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, mini-dose MTX combined with corticosteroids can significantly improve the ORR in patients with aGVHD and is well tolerated, although it did not achieve the prespecified 20% improvement with the addition of MTX.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04960644).

Inhibition of the JAK-STAT Pathway in the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review of the Literature

Psoriasis is a highly prevalent dermatological disease associated with an increased systemic inflammatory response. In addition, joint involvement is also present in around 20% of patients. Therefore, treatment modalities used in this condition should be simultaneously effective at improving skin manifestations, reducing inflammation, and addressing psoriatic arthritis when present. Twenty years ago, the introduction of biologic treatments for psoriasis was a turning point in the management of this condition, offering an effective and reasonably safe option for patients whose disease could not be adequately controlled with conventional therapies. At the moment, Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are a new class of promising molecules in the management of psoriasis. They are orally administered and can show benefits in patients who failed biologic therapy. We conducted a scoping review in order to identify randomized-controlled trials that investigated different JAKis in patients with plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, with an emphasis on molecules that have been approved by the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration. The added value of this study is that it collected information about JAKis approved for two different indications, plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, in order to provide an integrated understanding of the range of effects that JAKis have on the whole spectrum of psoriasis manifestations.

Flares of acute graft-versus-host disease: a Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium analysis

ABSTRACT

The absence of a standardized definition for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) flares and data on its clinical course are significant concerns. We retrospectively evaluated 968 patients across 23 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) transplant centers who achieved complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) within 4 weeks of treatment. The cumulative incidence of flares within 6 months was 22%, and flares were associated with a higher risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.19-7.36; P < .001). Flares were more severe (grades 3/4, 41% vs 16%; P < .001) and had more frequent lower gastrointestinal (LGI) involvement (55% vs 32%; P < .001) than the initial GVHD. At CR/VGPR, elevated MAGIC biomarkers predicted the future occurrence of a flare, along with its severity and LGI involvement. In multivariate analyses, higher Ann Arbor (AA) biomarker scores at CR/VGPR were significant risk factors for flares (AA2 vs AA1: aHR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.32-2.48; P = .001]; AA3 vs AA1: aHR, 3.14 [95% CI, 1.98-4.98; P < .001]), as were early response to initial treatment (aHR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.80; P = .004) and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.00-3.02; P = .049). MAGIC biomarkers also stratified the risk of NRM both at CR/VGPR and at the time of flare. We conclude that GVHD flares are common and carry a significant mortality risk. The occurrence of future flares can be predicted by serum biomarkers that may serve to guide adjustment and discontinuation of immunosuppression.

The road to refractory graft-versus-host disease is paved with good intentions

Refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs when the immune injury exceeds the capacity of injured tissues to regenerate and repair. While glucocorticoids have been used for decades to treat GVHD, Arnhold, Chang, and colleagues in this issue of the JCI question whether this approach can in fact be counterproductive. Using in vivo experimental models of GVHD and in vitro intestinal organoids, the study authors show that glucocorticoid exposure directly impeded small intestinal epithelial proliferation and survival, thus preventing the resolution of injury. These findings suggest that future treatment approaches for acute GVHD should include measures to reduce immune reactivity as well as interventions to actively promote tissue resilience.

Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein instructs dendritic cells to elicit Th22 cell response

Neutrophil-derived bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) is known for its bactericidal activity against gram-negative bacteria and neutralization of lipopolysaccharide. Here, we define BPI as a potent activator of murine dendritic cells (DCs). As shown in GM-CSF-cultured, bone-marrow-derived cells (BMDCs), BPI induces a distinct stimulation profile including IL-2, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor expression. Conventional DCs also respond to BPI, while M-CSF-cultivated or peritoneal lavage macrophages do not. Subsequent to BPI stimulation of BMDCs, CD4+ T cells predominantly secrete IL-22 and, when naive, preferentially differentiate into T helper 22 (Th22) cells. Congruent with the tissue-protective properties of IL-22 and along with impaired IL-22 induction, disease severity is significantly increased during dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in BPI-deficient mice. Importantly, physiological diversification of intestinal microbiota fosters BPI-dependent IL-22 induction in CD4+ T cells derived from mesenteric lymph nodes. In conclusion, BPI is a potent activator of DCs and consecutive Th22 cell differentiation with substantial relevance in intestinal homeostasis.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease in children: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GvHD) represents a major complication of pediatric allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ruxolitinib, a selective JAK 1-2 inhibitor, showed promising results in the treatment of SR-GvHD in adult trial, including patients >12 years old. This systematic review aims to evaluate ruxolitinib use for SR-GvHD in the pediatric population. Among the 12 studies included, ruxolitinib administration presented slight differences. Overall response rate (ORR) ranged from 45% to 100% in both acute and chronic GvHD. Complete response rates (CR) varied from 9% to 67% and from 0% to 28% in aGvHD and cGvHD, respectively. Individual-patient meta-analysis from 108 children under 12 years showed an ORR and CR for aGvHD of 74% and 56%, respectively, while in cGvHD ORR was 78% but with only 11% achieving CR. Treatment-related toxicities were observed in 20% of patients, including cytopenia, liver toxicity, and infections. Age, weight, graft source, previous lines of therapy, and dose did not significantly predict response, while a higher rate of toxicities was observed in aGvHD patients. In conclusion, ruxolitinib shows promising results in the treatment of SR-GvHD in children, including those under 12 years. Specific pediatric perspective trials are currently ongoing to definitely assess its efficacy and safety.

Janus kinase inhibitors modify the fatty acid profile of extracellular vesicles and modulate the immune response

Background

Janus kinase inhibitors (jakinibs) are immunomodulators used for treating malignancies, autoimmune diseases, and immunodeficiencies. However, they induce adverse effects such as thrombosis, lymphocytosis, and neutropenia that could be mediated by extracellular vesicles (EVs). These particles are cell membrane-derived structures that transport cellular and environmental molecules and participate in intercellular communication. Jakinibs can modify the content of EVs and enable them to modulate the activity of different components of the immune response.

Objective

to evaluate the interactions between immune system components of healthy individuals and EVs derived from monocytic and lymphoid lineage cells generated in the presence of baricitinib (BARI) and itacitinib (ITA) and their possible effects.

Methods

EVs were isolated from monocytes (M) and lymphocytes (L) of healthy individuals, as well as from U937 (U) and Jurkat (J) cells exposed to non-cytotoxic concentrations of BARI, ITA, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; vehicle control). The binding to and engulfment of EVs by peripheral blood leukocytes of healthy individuals were analyzed by flow cytometry using CFSE-stained EVs and anti-CD45-PeCy7 mAb-labeled whole blood. The effect of EVs on respiratory burst, T-cell activation and proliferation, cytokine synthesis, and platelet aggregation was evaluated. Respiratory burst was assessed in PMA-stimulated neutrophils by the dihydrorhodamine (DHR) test and flow cytometry. T-cell activation and proliferation and cytokine production were assessed in CFSE-stained PBMC cultures stimulated with PHA; expression of the T-cell activation markers CD25 and CD69 and T-cell proliferation were analyzed by flow cytometry, and the cytokine levels were quantified in culture supernatants by Luminex assays. Platelet aggregation was analyzed in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) samples by light transmission aggregometry. The EVs' fatty acid (FA) profile was analyzed using methyl ester derivatization followed by gas chromatography.

Results

ITA exposure during the generation of EVs modified the size of the EVs released; however, treatment with DMSO and BARI did not alter the size of EVs generated from U937 and Jurkat cells. Circulating neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes showed a 2-fold greater tendency to internalize ITA-U-EVs than their respective DMSO control. The neutrophil respiratory burst was attenuated in greater extent by M-EVs than by L-EVs. Autologous ITA-M-EVs reduced T-cell proliferation by decreasing IL-2 levels and CD25 expression independently of CD69. A higher accumulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines was observed in PHA-stimulated PBMC cultures exposed to M-EVs than to L-EVs; this difference may be related to the higher myristate content of M-EVs. Platelet aggregation increased in the presence of ITA-L/M-EVs by a mechanism presumably dependent on the high arachidonic acid content of the vesicles.

Conclusions

Cellular origin and jakinib exposure modify the FA profile of EVs, enabling them, in turn, to modulate neutrophil respiratory burst, T-cell proliferation, and platelet aggregation. The increased T-cell proliferation induced by BARI-L/M-EVs could explain the lymphocytosis observed in patients treated with BARI. The higher proportion of arachidonic acid in the FA content of ITA-L/M-EVs could be related to the thrombosis described in patients treated with ITA. EVs also induced a decrease in the respiratory burst of neutrophils.

Janus kinase inhibition in the treatment and prevention of graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For many years, corticosteroids have been the mainstay treatment for GVHD, but cases of steroid-refractory GVHD and the severe adverse effects of high-dose corticosteroids have increased the need for preventative and therapeutic strategies for GVHD. Due to the nature of alloreactive T cells, GVHD is inherently linked to the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, the therapeutic driving force behind stem cell transplantation. A considerable clinical challenge is to preserve GVL while suppressing GVHD. The field of GVHD research has greatly expanded over the past decades, including advancements in T cell modulation and depletion, antibody therapies, chemotherapeutics, cellular therapies, and Janus kinase inhibition. In this review, we discuss current approaches and advances in the prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD with a focus on new emerging advancements in Janus kinase inhibitor therapy.

A review of low dose interleukin-2 therapy in management of chronic graft-versus-host-disease

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) have low circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs). Interleukin-2(IL-2) is a growth factor for Tregs, and clinical trials have explored its use in cGVHD patients.

AREAS COVERED

Here we will discuss the biology of IL-2, its rationale for use and results of clinical trials in cGVHD. We also describe its mechanisms of action and alteration in gene expression in T-cell subsets after treatment with low dose IL-2 and photopheresis.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials using Low dose IL-2 have been done at single centers in small patient series. The majority of the clinical responses seen with IL-2 in cGVHD are classified as partial responses and efficacy as a single agent is limited. Compared to currently approved oral therapies, it has to be administered subcutaneously and requires specialized processing for compounding and storage limiting its widespread use. Its use is associated with constitutional symptoms and local injection site reactions. Local reactions can be easily managed by supportive care practices like rotation of injection sites and premeditations, constitutional symptoms resolve with, dose reduction (25-50%) allowing for continued therapy. Additional studies are needed to define optimal combination strategies with approved agents. Longer acting formulations of IL-2 that require less frequent dosing may also improve patient compliance.

Exploring Novel Frontiers: Leveraging STAT3 Signaling for Advanced Cancer Therapeutics

Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3) plays a significant role in diverse physiologic processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis, and survival. STAT3 activation via phosphorylation of tyrosine and serine residues is a complex and tightly regulated process initiated by upstream signaling pathways with ligand binding to receptor and non-receptor-linked kinases. Through downstream deregulation of target genes, aberrations in STAT3 activation are implicated in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and recurrence in multiple cancers. While there have been extensive efforts to develop direct and indirect STAT3 inhibitors using novel drugs as a therapeutic strategy, direct clinical application remains in evolution. In this review, we outline the mechanisms of STAT3 activation, the resulting downstream effects in physiologic and malignant settings, and therapeutic strategies for targeting STAT3. We also summarize the pre-clinical and clinical evidence of novel drug therapies targeting STAT3 and discuss the challenges of establishing their therapeutic efficacy in the current clinical landscape.

Recent advances in allogeneic transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent advancements in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

RECENT FINDINGS

Important improvements have been observed throughout the allo-HSCT procedure and patient management. Universal donor availability and reduced risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have been achieved with the introduction of posttransplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis. It has contributed, together with advances in conditioning regimens, GVHD treatment and supportive care, to a reduced overall toxicity of the procedure. Relapse is now the most frequent cause of transplant failure. With increased knowledge of the biological characterization of AML, better prediction of transplant risks and more profound and standardized minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, pharmacological, and immunological strategies to prevent relapse are been developed.

SUMMARY

Allo-HSCT remains the standard of care for high-risk AML. Increased access to transplant, reduced toxicity and relapse are improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize MRD monitoring, refine conditioning regimens, and explore new GVHD management and relapse prevention therapies.

Novel developments in the prophylaxis and treatment of acute GVHD

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Traditional standard prophylaxis for aGVHD has included a calcineurin inhibitor plus an antimetabolite, whereas treatment has relied mainly on corticosteroids, followed by multiple nonstandard second-line options. In the past decade, this basic framework has been reshaped by approval of antithymocyte globulin products, the emergence of posttransplant cyclophosphamide, and recent pivotal trials studying abatacept and vedolizumab for GVHD prophylaxis, whereas ruxolitinib was approved for corticosteroid-refractory aGVHD treatment. Because of this progress, routine acute GVHD prophylaxis and treatment practices are starting to shift, and results of ongoing trials are eagerly awaited. Here, we review recent developments in aGVHD prevention and therapy, along with ongoing and future planned clinical trials in this space, outlining what future goals should be and the limitations of current clinical trial designs and end points.

Mini-dose methotrexate combined with methylprednisolone as a first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease: A phase 2 trial

Background and Objectives

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) remains a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Methylprednisolone (MP; 1-2 mg/kg/day) remains the standard first-line therapy for aGvHD, although no response is detected in nearly one-half of the patients with aGvHD. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of mini-dose methotrexate (MTX) combined with standard-dose MP as a front-line therapy for aGvHD.

Materials and Methods

A prospective Phase 2 clinical trial was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 5 mg/m2 MTX combined with 1 mg/kg/day MP as the initial therapy in 31 patients with aGvHD. Moreover, the effects of MTX combined with MP were explored in a humanized xenogeneic murine model of aGvHD.

Results

The overall response and complete response rate at 7 days after the initial treatment were 100% and 83%, respectively. The overall response rate on day 28 was 87%. The complete response rates for aGvHD grades I, II, and III were 100% (6/6), 82% (18/22), and 66% (2/3), respectively. Grade 3 toxicities occurred in only three patients presenting with cytopenia. Importantly, MTX and MP demonstrated synergistic effects on ameliorating aGvHD in humanized xenogeneic murine model.

Conclusion

The current study suggests that mini-dose MTX combined with standard-dose MP could potentially become a novel first-line therapy for patients with aGvHD.

Combinatorial inhibition of Tec kinases BTK and ITK is beneficial in ameliorating murine sclerodermatous chronic graft versus host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the major factor limiting the widespread use of potentially curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Chronic GVHD is characterized by the activation of alloreactive donor immune cells, especially B- and T-cells, leading to tissue damage and pathogenic fibrosis. In this study, we used highly specific next-generation inhibitors of ITK (PCYC-274), BTK (PCYC-804), and ibrutinib-like BTK/ITK inhibitors (PCYC-914 and PCYC-401) in the B10.D2 → BALB/C model of murine sclerodermatous cGVHD. From the third week onward, allogeneic recipients in each group of respective Tec kinase inhibitors were treated three times weekly with inhibitors at doses of 10 and 30 mg/kg or with saline control via oral gavage. Overall, we found that selective BTK inhibition was less effective than combined ITK/BTK or ITK inhibition in lengthening survival and reducing symptoms of cGVHD. ITK inhibition was most efficacious, with PCYC-274 and PCYC-401 demonstrating a nearly 50 percent reduction in GVHD scoring even at the 10 mg/kg dose, while 30 mg/kg of these compounds almost completely ameliorated GVHD symptomology. BTK/ITK and ITK-treated mice showed significant reductions in overall pathology. Significant reductions in dermal thickness and fibrosis were shown for all treatment groups. There was evidence of mixed Th1 and Th2 cytokine profiles in the skin of mice with dermal cGVHD, as both IFN-gamma and IL-4 were upregulated in the allogeneic control group, while kinase inhibition significantly reduced levels of these cytokines. Using an in vitro model of T-cell polarization, Th1 cell production of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma were partially blocked by ITK. Th2 cell production of IL-4 was almost completely blocked synergistically by ITK and BTK inhibition. BTK-specific inhibition was unable to block either Th1 or Th2 cytokine production. Taken together, these results confirm previous reports that ITK-focused inhibition inhibits Th1 and Th2 cells. Additionally, the compound's effects on T-cell proliferation were tested by CFSE assay. Pure ITK inhibition was most effective at blocking T-cell proliferation, with no proliferation in PCYC-274-treated cells even at 0.1uM. PCYC-401 and PCYC-914 showed some inhibition at lower doses, with complete inhibition evident at 10uM. PCYC-804 was only partially able to block proliferation even at 10uM. In conclusion, we observed substantial benefit for differential inhibition of Tec kinases in GVHD, with ITK being most efficacious and Th1 cells being more resistant to inhibition, matching the previously reported findings of a Th2 to Th1 selective pressure in cells treated with ibrutinib. Our data warrants the further development of ITK and ITK/BTK inhibitors with specific inhibitory ratios to improve the treatment of GVHD and other T-cell mediated diseases.

Ruxolitinib as the first post-steroid treatment for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) are potentially life-threatening complications occurring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although steroids represent the first-line treatment for both conditions, in those patients who do not adequately benefit from steroid therapy, standardized treatment algorithms are lacking. In recent years, ruxolitinib has emerged as the most promising agent for the second-line therapy of steroid-refractory (SR)-GvHD.

AREAS COVERED

This review will summarize the biological properties and the mechanistic aspects that justify the therapeutic role of ruxolitinib in GvHD. In addition, current treatment options for SR-GvHD will be briefly discussed. Finally, results of the most relevant clinical trials on the use of ruxolitinib for SR-GvHD will be analyzed, with a particular focus on two phase-III randomized trials in which ruxolitinib demonstrated its superiority in comparison with the best available therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Ruxolitinib has considerably improved the outcome of patients with SR-acute/chronic-GvHD and should be regarded as the standard-of-care option when corticosteroids fail or cannot be tapered. Nevertheless, a number of questions still remain unanswered and significant room for improvement exists. Additional observations derived from a longer follow-up will certainly increase our expertise in the management of this powerful therapy.

Acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common immune complication that can occur after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Acute GVHD is a major health problem in these patients, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Acute GVHD is caused by the recognition and the destruction of the recipient tissues and organs by the donor immune effector cells. This condition usually occurs within the first 3 months after alloHCT, but later onset is possible. Targeted organs include the skin, the lower and upper gastrointestinal tract and the liver. Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical examination, and complementary examinations are performed to exclude differential diagnoses. Preventive treatment for acute GVHD is administered to all patients who receive alloHCT, although it is not always effective. Steroids are used for first-line treatment, and the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor ruxolitinib is second-line treatment. No validated treatments are available for acute GVHD that is refractory to steroids and ruxolitinib, and therefore it remains an unmet medical need.

Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease: An Update on New Treatment Options

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in approximately 50% of patients and remains a primary driver of non-relapse and transplant-related mortality. The best treatment remains prevention with either in vivo or ex vivo T-cell depletion, with multiple strategies used worldwide based on factors such as institution preference, ability to perform graft manipulation, and ongoing clinical trials. Predicting patients at high risk for developing severe acute GVHD based on clinical and biomarker-based criteria allows for escalation or potential de-escalation of therapy. Modern therapies for treatment of the disease include JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors, which are standard of care in the second-line setting and are being investigated for upfront management of non-severe risk based on biomarkers. Salvage therapies beyond the second-line remain suboptimal. In this review, we will focus on the most clinically used GVHD prevention and treatment strategies, including the accumulating data on JAK inhibitors in both settings.

Evolving cognition of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: autoimmune disorders and cancer

The Janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of transmembrane signal transduction that enables cells to communicate with the exterior environment. Various cytokines, interferons, growth factors, and other specific molecules activate JAK-STAT signaling to drive a series of physiological and pathological processes, including proliferation, metabolism, immune response, inflammation, and malignancy. Dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling and related genetic mutations are strongly associated with immune activation and cancer progression. Insights into the structures and functions of the JAK-STAT pathway have led to the development and approval of diverse drugs for the clinical treatment of diseases. Currently, drugs have been developed to mainly target the JAK-STAT pathway and are commonly divided into three subtypes: cytokine or receptor antibodies, JAK inhibitors, and STAT inhibitors. And novel agents also continue to be developed and tested in preclinical and clinical studies. The effectiveness and safety of each kind of drug also warrant further scientific trials before put into being clinical applications. Here, we review the current understanding of the fundamental composition and function of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. We also discuss advancements in the understanding of JAK-STAT-related pathogenic mechanisms; targeted JAK-STAT therapies for various diseases, especially immune disorders, and cancers; newly developed JAK inhibitors; and current challenges and directions in the field.

Effective treatment of low-risk acute GVHD with itacitinib monotherapy

The standard primary treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) requires prolonged, high-dose systemic corticosteroids (SCSs) that delay reconstitution of the immune system. We used validated clinical and biomarker staging criteria to identify a group of patients with low-risk (LR) GVHD that is very likely to respond to SCS. We hypothesized that itacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, would effectively treat LR GVHD without SCS. We treated 70 patients with LR GVHD in a multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT03846479) with 28 days of itacitinib 200 mg/d (responders could receive a second 28-day cycle), and we compared their outcomes to those of 140 contemporaneous, matched control patients treated with SCSs. More patients responded to itacitinib within 7 days (81% vs 66%, P = .02), and response rates at day 28 were very high for both groups (89% vs 86%, P = .67), with few symptomatic flares (11% vs 12%, P = .88). Fewer itacitinib-treated patients developed a serious infection within 90 days (27% vs 42%, P = .04) due to fewer viral and fungal infections. Grade ≥3 cytopenias were similar between groups except for less severe leukopenia with itacitinib (16% vs 31%, P = .02). No other grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in >10% of itacitinib-treated patients. There were no significant differences between groups at 1 year for nonrelapse mortality (4% vs 11%, P = .21), relapse (18% vs 21%, P = .64), chronic GVHD (28% vs 33%, P = .33), or survival (88% vs 80%, P = .11). Itacitinib monotherapy seems to be a safe and effective alternative to SCS treatment for LR GVHD and deserves further investigation.

Itacitinib Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response in Patients With Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

This article presents the population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis and exposure-response analyses for the primary efficacy end point-acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) day 28 response-and select safety measures (incidence of thrombocytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, and cytomegalovirus infection) from a phase 3 randomized, double-blind study comparing itacitinib plus corticosteroids versus placebo plus corticosteroids for the treatment of aGVHD. The PopPK data set contained sparse data from patients with aGVHD and select enriched data from healthy volunteers. The structural model was a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination and dose-dependent nonlinear absorption with dual first-order absorption pathways with lag times. Strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor coadministration, moderate renal impairment, and participant population (healthy volunteers vs patients with aGVHD) were covariates on apparent clearance. Participant population was also a covariate on apparent intercompartmental clearance and lag time of the secondary absorption compartment. Apparent clearance decreased 42% with coadministration of strong CYP3A inhibitors. Simulations supported the following dose reductions with concomitant use of a strong CYP3A inhibitor: 300 mg once daily to 200 mg once daily, 400 mg once daily to 300 mg once daily, and 600 mg once daily to 400 mg once daily. No dose adjustment is recommended for any other covariate based on the magnitude of impact when they were retained in the model. The exposure-response relationship was characterized between itacitinib exposure and probability of aGVHD day 28 response using a linear logistic regression model. Both itacitinib exposure and aGVHD risk status were significant predictors of response. There was no relationship between itacitinib exposure and thrombocytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, or cytomegalovirus infection.

JAK/STAT pathway: Extracellular signals, diseases, immunity, and therapeutic regimens

Janus kinase/signal transduction and transcription activation (JAK/STAT) pathways were originally thought to be intracellular signaling pathways that mediate cytokine signals in mammals. Existing studies show that the JAK/STAT pathway regulates the downstream signaling of numerous membrane proteins such as such as G-protein-associated receptors, integrins and so on. Mounting evidence shows that the JAK/STAT pathways play an important role in human disease pathology and pharmacological mechanism. The JAK/STAT pathways are related to aspects of all aspects of the immune system function, such as fighting infection, maintaining immune tolerance, strengthening barrier function, and cancer prevention, which are all important factors involved in immune response. In addition, the JAK/STAT pathways play an important role in extracellular mechanistic signaling and might be an important mediator of mechanistic signals that influence disease progression, immune environment. Therefore, it is important to understand the mechanism of the JAK/STAT pathways, which provides ideas for us to design more drugs targeting diseases based on the JAK/STAT pathway. In this review, we discuss the role of the JAK/STAT pathway in mechanistic signaling, disease progression, immune environment, and therapeutic targets.

Therapy response of glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD of the lower intestinal tract

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. While most studies report therapy-response of aGVHD including a cumulative grade of skin, liver and intestinal tract manifestations, there is a lack of information specifically on lower gastrointestinal tract aGVHD (GI-GVHD) therapy-response, which is highly relevant in light of novel therapies that target intestinal regeneration such as IL-22, R-spondin or GLP-2. Here we retrospectively analyzed patients who developed GI-GVHD over a 6-year period. A total of 144 patients developed GI-GVHD and 82 (57%) were resistant to glucocorticoid-therapy (SR). The most commonly used second-line therapy was ruxolitinib (74%). Overall and complete response (CR) to ruxolitinib on day 28 were 44.5% and 13%, respectively. SR-GVHD patients experienced a lower 5-year overall survival (OS) (34.8 vs 53.3%, p = 0.0014) and higher incidence of 12-months non-relapse-mortality (39.2 vs 14.3%, p = 0.016) compared to glucocorticoid-sensitive patients. SR-GI-GVHD patients, that achieved a CR on day 28 after ruxolitinib start, experienced a higher OS compared to non-CR patients (p = 0.04). These findings indicate that therapy response of SR-GI-GVHD to different immunosuppressive approaches is still low, and that novel therapies specifically aiming at enhanced intestinal regeneration should be tested in clinical trials.

A biomarker signature to predict complete response to itacitinib and corticosteroids in acute graft-versus-host disease

A broad proteomic analysis was conducted to identify and evaluate candidate biomarkers potentially predictive of response to treatment with an oral selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, itacitinib, in acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). Plasma samples from 25 participants (identification cohort; NCT02614612) were used to identify novel biomarkers that were tested in a validation cohort from a placebo‐controlled, randomised trial (n = 210; NCT03139604). The identification cohort received corticosteroids plus 200 or 300 mg itacitinib once daily. The validation cohort received corticosteroids plus 200 mg itacitinib once daily or placebo. A broad proteomic analysis was conducted using a proximity extension assay. Baseline and longitudinal comparisons were performed with unpaired t‐test and one‐way analysis of variance used to evaluate biomarker level changes. Seven candidate biomarkers were identified. Monocyte‐chemotactic protein (MCP)3, pro‐calcitonin/calcitonin (ProCALCA/CALCA), together with a previously identified prognostic acute GVHD biomarker, regenerating islet‐derived protein (REG)3A, stratified complete responders from non‐responders (participants with progressive disease) to itacitinib, but not placebo, potentially representing predictive biomarkers of itacitinib in acute GVHD. ProCALCA/CALCA, suppressor of tumorigenicity (ST)2, and tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)1 were significantly reduced over time by itacitinib in responders, potentially representing response‐to‐treatment biomarkers. Novel biomarkers have the potential to identify patients with acute GVHD that may respond to itacitinib plus corticosteroid treatment (NCT02614612; NCT03139604).

The role of JAK inhibitors in hematopoietic cell transplantation

The Janus Kinase (JAK)/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STAT) pathway is essential for both the regulation of hematopoiesis and the control of inflammation. Disruption of this pathway can lead to inflammatory and malignant disease processes. JAK inhibitors, designed to control the downstream effects of pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokines, have been successfully used in pre-clinical models and clinical studies of patients with autoimmune diseases, hematologic malignancies, and the hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) complication graft versus host disease (GVHD). In the last decade, JAK inhibitors Ruxolitinib, Fedratinib, and most recently Pacritinib have been United States Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). Ruxolitinib was also recently approved for the treatment of steroid refractory acute as well as chronic GVHD; JAK inhibitors are currently under evaluation in the pre-HCT setting in MF and for the prevention of GVHD. This review will focus on the role of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, the potential function of pre-HCT JAK inhibitors in patients with MF, and the role of JAK inhibitors in the prevention and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD.

Extracorporeal photopheresis in acute and chronic steroid‑refractory graft-versus-host disease: an evolving treatment landscape

Patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) are known to have a poor prognosis and for decades no approved drug has been available to treat this serious condition. Although ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/2 inhibitor demonstrated significantly higher response rates in randomized trials compared to the best available therapy, and thus, is of benefit in both acute as well as chronic GvHD, there is an urgent medical need to improve results, such as durability of responses, response in eye, liver and lung manifestations and reduction of infectious complications. In this "Review" article we would like to offer strategies for improving treatment results in patients with steroid-refractory GvHD by combining ruxolitinib with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), a leukapheresis-based immunomodulatory treatment frequently applied in T-cell mediated immune disease including GvHD. Our article explores key published evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of both ruxolitinib and ECP in the treatment of GvHD and highlights their potentially complementary mechanisms of action.

OUP accepted manuscript

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. For many years, there have been few effective treatment options for patients with GVHD. First-line systemic treatment remains corticosteroids, but up to 50% of patients will develop steroid-refractory GVHD and the prognosis for these patients is poor. Elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of acute and chronic GVHD has laid a foundation for novel therapeutic approaches. Since 2017, there have now been 4 approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for GVHD. Ruxolitinib, an oral selective JAK1/2 inhibitor, received FDA approval for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD in 2019 and remains the only agent approved for acute GVHD. There are currently 3 FDA approvals for the treatment of chronic GVHD: (1) ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor traditionally used for B-cell malignancies, was the first agent approved for chronic GVHD after failure of one or more lines of systemic therapy, (2) belumosudil, an oral selective inhibitor of ROCK2, for patients with chronic GVHD who received at least 2 prior lines of treatment, and (3) ruxolitinib for chronic GVHD after failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy. In this review, we highlight the clinical data which support these FDA approvals in acute and chronic GVHD with a focus on mechanism of actions, clinical efficacy, and toxicities associated with these agents.