Personalised progression prediction in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma (PANGEA): a retrospective, multicohort study

Smoldering multiple myeloma: taking the narrow over the wide path?

ABSTRACT

Smoldering multiple myeloma (MM) is an asymptomatic clonal plasma cell condition considered as a premalignant entity that may evolve over time to symptomatic MM. Based on a "poorly defined" risk of progression, some well-intended investigators proposed prospective interventional trials for these individuals. We believe this may be a harmful intervention and favor a close "wait and watch" approach and rather enroll these patients in dedicated observational biological studies aiming to better identify patients who will evolve to MM, based on their plasma cells' biology, including genomics, epigenetics, and the immune microenvironment.

Round Table Discussion on Optimal Clinical Trial Design in Precursor Multiple Myeloma

SUMMARY

While the current approach to precursor hematologic conditions is to "watch and wait," this may change with the development of therapies that are safe and extend survival or delay the onset of symptomatic disease. The goal of future therapies in precursor hematologic conditions is to improve survival and prevent or delay the development of symptomatic disease while maximizing safety. Clinical trial considerations in this field include identifying an appropriate at-risk population, safety assessments, dose selection, primary and secondary trial endpoints including surrogate endpoints, control arms, and quality-of-life metrics, all of which may enable more precise benefit-risk assessment.

Long-Term Follow-Up Defines the Population That Benefits from Early Interception in a High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trial Using the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone

Background

Early therapeutic intervention in high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) has demonstrated benefit in previous studies of lenalidomide with or without dexamethasone. Triplets and quadruplet studies have been examined in this same population. However, to date, none of these studies examined the impact of depth of response on long-term outcomes of participants treated with lenalidomide-based therapy, and whether the use of the 20/2/20 model or the addition of genomic alterations can further define the population that would benefit the most from early therapeutic intervention. Here, we present the results of the phase II study of the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with HR-SMM with long-term follow-up and baseline single-cell tumor and immune sequencing that help refine the population to be treated for early intervention studies.

Methods

This is a phase II trial of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRD) in HR-SMM. Patients received 9 cycles of induction therapy with ixazomib 4mg on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide 25mg on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by maintenance with ixazomib 4mg on days 1, 8, and 15; and lenalidomide 15mg d1-21 for 15 cycles for 24 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival after 2 years of therapy. Secondary endpoints included depth of response, biochemical progression, and correlative studies included single-cell RNA sequencing and/or whole-genome sequencing of the tumor and single-cell sequencing of immune cells at baseline.

Results

Fifty-five patients, with a median age of 64, were enrolled in the study. The overall response rate was 93%, with 31% of patients achieving a complete response and 45% achieving a very good partial response or better. The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (16 patients; 29%), leukopenia (10 patients; 18%), lymphocytopenia (8 patients; 15%), and thrombocytopenia (4 patients; 7%). Non-hematologic grade 3 or greater toxicities included hypophosphatemia (7 patients; 13%), rash (5 patients; 9%), and hypokalemia (4 patients; 7%). After a median follow-up of 50 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48.6 months (95% CI: 39.9 - not reached; NR) and median overall survival has not been reached. Patients achieving VGPR or better had a significantly better progression-free survival (p<0.001) compared to those who did not achieve VGPR (median PFS 58.2 months vs. 31.3 months). Biochemical progression preceded or was concurrent with the development of SLiM-CRAB criteria in eight patients during follow-up, indicating that biochemical progression is a meaningful endpoint that correlates with the development of end-organ damage. High-risk 20/2/20 participants had the worst PFS compared to low- and intermediate-risk participants. The use of whole genome or single-cell sequencing of tumor cells identified high-risk aberrations that were not identified by FISH alone and aided in the identification of participants at risk of progression. scRNA-seq analysis revealed a positive correlation between MHC class I expression and response to proteasome inhibition and at the same time a decreased proportion of GZMB+ T cells within the clonally expanded CD8+ T cell population correlated with suboptimal response.

Conclusions

Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in HR-SMM demonstrates significant clinical activity with an overall favorable safety profile. Achievement of VGPR or greater led to significant improvement in time to progression, suggesting that achieving deep response is beneficial in HR-SMM. Biochemical progression correlates with end-organ damage. Patients with high-risk FISH and lack of deep response had poor outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ( NCT02916771 ).

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Diagnosis and Management of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Monoclonal proteins are common, with a prevalence in the United States around 5% and the incidence increases with age. Although most patients are asymptomatic, the vast majority of cases are caused by a clonal plasma cell disorder. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are asymptomatic precursor conditions with variable risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM). In recent years, significant progress has been made to better understand the factors that lead to the development of symptoms and progression to myeloma. In this review, we summarize the current diagnosis treatment guidelines for MGUS and SMM and highlight recent advances that underscore a shifting paradigm in the evaluation and management of plasma cell precursor conditions.

An overview of multiple myeloma: A monoclonal plasma cell malignancy's diagnosis, management, and treatment modalities

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell cancer with high mortality and morbidity rates. Its incidence rate has increased by 143% since 1975. Adipokines, cytokines, chemokines, and genetic variations influence the development and progression of MM. Chromosomal translocations cause mutations associated with MM. The pathogenesis of MM is complicated by novel issues like miRNAs, RANKL, Wnt/DKK1, Wnt, and OPG. Conventional diagnosis methods include bone marrow biopsy, sPEP or uPEP, sIFE and uIFE, and sFLC assay, along with advanced techniques such as FISH, SNPA, and gene expression technologies. A novel therapeutic strategy has been developed recently. Chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and a variety of drug classes in combination are used to treat patients with high-risk diseases. Alkylating agents, PIs, and IMiDs have all been developed as effective treatment options for MM in recent years. This review overviews the current recommendations for managing MGUS, SMM, MM, SP and NSMM and discusses practices in diagnosing and treating MM.

Clinician preferences on treatment of smoldering myeloma: a cross-sectional survey

Background

Smoldering myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor condition to multiple myeloma (MM) with a variable risk of progression. The management of high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) remains controversial, particularly with changes in diagnostic criteria that led to reclassifying of some patients with SMM to MM. This study aimed to assess clinician preferences for whether to treat patients with HR-SMM and/or patients with MM diagnosed solely by SLiM criteria (free light chain ratio >100, bone marrow plasma cell percentage >60, greater than two focal marrow lesions on MRI) through an electronic survey.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey of clinicians, conducted via an anonymous online REDCap survey from May 16th to July 5th, 2023. The survey included questions on demographics, SMM surveillance practices, and management preferences for two clinical scenarios (HR-SMM and MM based solely on the free light chain ratio >100 criterion). Data was analysed descriptively via Microsoft Excel.

Findings

A total of 146 clinicians completed the full survey, with 92% recommending against routine treatment for a patient with HR-SMM based on a single time point assessment, instead preferring active surveillance. For patients with MM diagnosed solely on the basis of a free light chain ratio >100, 61% recommended active treatment, while 37% recommended active surveillance. The most common reasons recommending against treatment of HR-SMM were toxicity, lack of demonstrated overall survival benefit, and low MM-defining event rates in clinical trials.

Interpretation

The survey indicates that most clinicians recommend against routine treatment for HR-SMM. Active surveillance is the prevailing standard of care and it is therefore an appropriate control arm in future SMM trials. More randomised trials are needed to determine if early treatment of modern-era SMM offers a net benefit to patients.

Funding

None.

Understanding high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic condition with heterogeneous biology and various risks of progression to symptomatic disease. The best-known risk stratification models are Mayo-2018, and IWWG based on tumor burden. Recently, the personalized risk assessment tool PANGEA was introduced. New markers of SMM progression, including genomic and immune characteristics of plasma cells (PCs) and tumor microenvironment, are under investigation, and some have been incorporated into traditional scoring systems. Only one phase 3 clinical trial demonstrated an overall survival benefit of lenalidomide for high-risk SMM patients. The study has limitations, and most guidelines recommend observation or participation in clinical trials for high-risk SMM. High-intensity time-limited treatment strategies for high-risk SMM demonstrated deep responses in single-arm studies. But these treatments can cause adverse effects in asymptomatic patients.This review aims to understand better the risk of SMM progression from a clinical and biological point of view.

Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and T-cell clones of uncertain significance: are these premalignant conditions sharing a common identity?

Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and T-cell clones of uncertain significance are three premalignant conditions characterised by the presence of small clonal cell expansions in individuals without symptoms or signs that distinguish the related overt malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, multiple myeloma, and T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia). As most individuals with these precursor states never progress to malignancies, considerable interest has arisen in comprehending the steps involved in the progression to malignancy, providing more accurate models to investigate potential mechanisms of early blood cancer identification, prevention, and, possibly, intervention. Single-cell technologies and recent progress in high-throughput sequencing and multiomics approaches have contributed to a better definition of the pathophysiological mechanisms of these premalignant conditions, moving our knowledge in the field forward. In this Viewpoint, we analyse the seemingly shared biological trajectories in these precursor haematological malignancies in search of common pathogenetic events. In particular, we address the issue of interactions between expanding clones and their immune ecosystem, offering new clues that might prompt innovative ideas and inspire further investigations to understand the cellular and molecular dynamics entailing progression into overt malignant disease. The relationships between the non-leukaemic microenvironmental cells and the leukaemic counterpart, and the primary drivers of their initial clonal expansion, represent shared biologies that suggest a common identity among the premalignant conditions considered in this Viewpoint.

A gene signature can predict risk of MGUS progressing to multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Serum markers are currently used to stratify MGUS patients into clinical risk groups. A molecular signature predicting MGUS progression has not been produced. We have explored the use of gene expression profiling to risk-stratify MGUS and developed an optimized signature based on large samples with long-term follow-up. Microarrays of plasma cell mRNA from 334 MGUS with stable disease and 40 MGUS that progressed to MM within 10 years, was used to define a molecular signature of MGUS risk. After a three-fold cross-validation analysis, the top thirty-six genes that appeared in each validation and maximized the concordance between risk score and MGUS progression were included in the gene signature (GS36). The GS36 accurately predicted MGUS progression (C-statistic is 0.928). An optimal cut-point for risk of progression by the GS36 score was found to be 0.7, which identified a subset of 61 patients with a 10-year progression probability of 54.1%. The remainder of the 313 patients had a probability of progression of only 2.2%. The sensitivity and specificity were 82.5% and 91.6%. Furthermore, combination of GS36, free light chain ratio and immunoparesis identified a subset of MGUS patients with 82.4% risk of progression to MM within 10 years. A gene expression signature combined with serum markers created a highly robust model for predicting risk of MGUS progression. These findings strongly support the inclusion of genomic analysis in the management of MGUS to identify patients who may benefit from more frequent monitoring.