Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (STIMULUS-MDS1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2025 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification, and Management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a bone marrow stem cell cancer that is often fatal despite available treatments. Diagnosis, risk assessment, monitoring, and therapeutic management of AML have changed dramatically in the last decade due to increased pathophysiologic understanding, improved assessment technology, and the addition of at least 12 approved therapies.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis is based on the presence of immature leukemia cells in the blood, and/or bone marrow or less often in extra-medullary tissues. New biological insights have been integrated into recent classification systems.

RISK ASSESSMENT

The European Leukemia Network has published risk classification algorithms for both intensively and non-intensively treated patients based on cytogenetic and on molecular findings. Prognostic factors may differ based on the therapeutic approach.

MONITORING

Our increasing ability to quantify lower levels of measurable residual disease (MRD) potentially allows better response assessment, as well as dynamic monitoring of disease status. The incorporation of MRD findings into therapeutic decision-making is rapidly evolving.

RISK ADAPTED THERAPY

The availability of 12 newly approved agents has been welcomed; however, optimal strategies incorporating newer agents into therapeutic algorithms are debated. The overarching approach integrates patient and caregiver goals of care, comorbidities, and disease characteristics.

Plasticity of tumor cell immunogenicity: is it druggable?

This short perspective presents, at a high level, some observations and speculations about cancer immunotherapy that derive from experiences at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Novartis Institutes of Biomedical Research.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for MDS-clinical issues, choosing preparative regimens and outcome

Despite the vast heterogeneity of myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS), treatment options are limited and an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative approach. While, subsequently, allo-HSCT is the treatment of choice in fit high-risk MDS patients younger than 70 years, it should only be considered in young and fit low-risk MDS patients who suffer from severe and life threatening cytopenias, and fail all available conservative treatment options. With the increasing use of mismatched or haploidentical donors, the majority of MDS patients will have a suitable donor available, however, matched donors should still be preferred if rapidly available. Strategies to prevent relapse after allo-HSCT are scarce, and include the use of donor lymphocytes or the experimental use of hypomethylating agents in patients with impeding relapse detected by MRD or chimerism evaluation. Here, we summarize current treatment options and factors to consider in the context of allo-HSCT in MDS.

Targeting novel regulated cell death: disulfidptosis in cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors

The battle against cancer has evolved over centuries, from the early stages of surgical resection to contemporary treatments including chemotherapy, radiation, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. Despite significant advances in cancer treatment over recent decades, these therapies remain limited by various challenges. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a cornerstone of tumor immunotherapy, have emerged as one of the most promising advancements in cancer treatment. Although ICIs, such as CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, have demonstrated clinical efficacy, their therapeutic impact remains suboptimal due to patient-specific variability and tumor immune resistance. Cell death is a fundamental process for maintaining tissue homeostasis and function. Recent research highlights that the combination of induced regulatory cell death (RCD) and ICIs can substantially enhance anti-tumor responses across multiple cancer types. In cells exhibiting high levels of recombinant solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) protein, glucose deprivation triggers a programmed cell death (PCD) pathway characterized by disulfide bond formation and REDOX (reduction-oxidation) reactions, termed "disulfidptosis." Studies suggest that disulfidptosis plays a critical role in the therapeutic efficacy of SLC7A11high cancers. Therefore, to investigate the potential synergy between disulfidptosis and ICIs, this study will explore the mechanisms of both processes in tumor progression, with the goal of enhancing the anti-tumor immune response of ICIs by targeting the intracellular disulfidptosis pathway.

Differential impact of TIM-3 ligands on NK cell function

BACKGROUND

The transmembrane protein T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing molecule 3 (TIM-3) is an immune checkpoint receptor that is expressed by a variety of leukocyte subsets, particularly in the tumor microenvironment. An effective TIM-3-targeting therapy should account for multiple biological factors, including the disease setting, the specific cell types involved and their varying sensitivities to the four putative TIM-3 ligands (galectin-9, phosphatidylserine, high mobility group protein B1 and carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 1), each of which engages a unique binding site on the receptor's variable immunoglobulin domain. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence and function of TIM-3+ natural killer (NK) cells in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), determine whether the four TIM-3 ligands differentially affect TIM-3+ NK cell functions, identify the most immunosuppressive ligand, and evaluate whether targeting ligand-mediated TIM-3 signaling enhances NK cell effector functions.

METHODS

Single-cell RNA sequencing and flow cytometry were used to study the prevalence, phenotypes and function of TIM-3+ NK cells in HNSCC patient tumors and blood. In vitro killing, proliferation and cytokine production assays were implemented to evaluate whether the four TIM-3 ligands differentially modulate TIM-3+ NK cell functions, and whether disruption of TIM-3/ligand interaction can enhance NK cell-mediated antitumor effector mechanisms. Finally, The Cancer Genome Atlas survival analysis and digital spatial profiling were employed to study the potential impact of etiology-associated differences on patients with HNSCC outcomes.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that TIM-3 is highly prevalent on circulating and tumor-infiltrating NK cells. It co-expresses with CD44 and marks NK cells with heightened effector potential. Among the four putative TIM-3 ligands, galectin-9 most consistently suppresses NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity and proliferation through TIM-3 and CD44 signaling, respectively, but promotes IFN-γ release in a TIM-3-dependent manner. Among patients with HNSCC, an elevated intratumoral TIM-3+ NK cell gene signature associates with worse outcomes, specifically in those with human papillomavirus (HPV)+ disease, potentially attributable to higher galectin-9 levels in HPV+ versus HPV- patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the complex functional impact of TIM-3 ligand signaling, which is consistent with recent clinical trials suggesting that targeting TIM-3 alone is suboptimal as an immunotherapeutic approach for treating malignancies.

Nuclear Molecular Imaging for Evaluating T Cell Exhaustion

T cells are indispensable for the therapeutic efficacy of cancer immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint blockade. However, prolonged antigen exposure also drives T cells into exhaustion, which is characterized by upregulated inhibitory molecules, impaired effector functions, reduced cytotoxicity, altered metabolism, etc. Noninvasive monitoring of T cell exhaustion allows a timely identification of cancer patients that are most likely to benefit from immunotherapies. In this Review, we briefly explain the biological cascades underlying the modulation of inhibitory molecules, present a concise update on the nuclear molecular imaging tracers of T cell exhaustion, and then discuss the potential opportunities for future development.

Combination therapy involving azacitidine for acute myeloid leukemia patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a complex hematological malignancy predominantly affecting the elderly, with a median diagnosis age of 68 years. Despite advances in treatment, elderly AML patients face suboptimal survival outcomes, with an estimated 5-year survival rate below 20 %. Epigenetic dysregulation, notably DNA methylation, is a key factor in the progression of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) to AML. This review examines various combination regimens involving azacitidine (AZA), including those with lenalidomide, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), kinase inhibitors, metabolic enzyme inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and anti-apoptotic protein inhibitors. Notable among these are the combinations with venetoclax, which has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in phase III trials, and the emerging IDH inhibitors ivosidenib and enasidenib, which have shown significant clinical benefits in patients with IDH mutations. While combination therapies with AZA hold great promise, challenges persist, including translating in vitro synergies to in vivo efficacy and identifying optimal regimens for specific patient populations. Cumulative toxicities may also offset clinical benefits, necessitating rigorous clinical trial design. Future research must focus on refining combination strategies, optimizing dosages and sequences, and thoroughly evaluating therapeutic efficacy and safety to advance the treatment of AML and improve patient outcomes.

Current trends in sensitizing immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically transformed the treatment landscape for various malignancies, achieving notable clinical outcomes across a wide range of indications. Despite these advances, resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a critical clinical challenge, characterized by variable response rates and non-durable benefits. However, growing research into the complex intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of tumors has advanced our understanding of the mechanisms behind ICI resistance, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Additionally, robust predictive biomarkers are crucial for optimizing patient selection and maximizing the efficacy of ICBs. Recent studies have emphasized that multiple rational combination strategies can overcome immune checkpoint resistance and enhance susceptibility to ICIs. These findings not only deepen our understanding of tumor biology but also reveal the unique mechanisms of action of sensitizing agents, extending clinical benefits in cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we will explore the underlying biology of ICIs, discuss the significance of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and clinical predictive biomarkers, analyze the current mechanisms of resistance, and outline alternative combination strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ICIs, including personalized strategies for sensitizing tumors to ICIs.

Nontransplant treatment approaches for myeloid neoplasm with mutated TP53

TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain a challenging spectrum of clonal myeloid disease with poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that in AML, MDS, and MDS/AML with biallelic TP53 loss, the TP53-mutated clone becomes dominant. These are highly aggressive diseases that are resistant to most chemotherapies. The latest 2022 International Consensus Classification categorizes these diseases under "myeloid disease with mutated TP53." All treatment approaches have not improved survival rates for this disease. Many newer therapies are on the horizon, including chimeric antigen receptor T/NK-cell therapies, mutated p53 reactivators, Fc fusion protein, and monoclonal antibodies targeting various myeloid antigens. This review summarizes the current approaches for myeloid disease with TP53 mutation and provides an overview of emerging nontransplant approaches.

Updates in novel immunotherapeutic strategies for relapsed/refractory AML

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a severe hematological malignancy with poor outcomes, particularly in older adults. Traditional treatment options like high-dose chemotherapy often lead to refractory or relapsed AML, with even worse outcomes. New therapies for relapsed and refractory AML are needed, and this review explores the most recent advancements in immunotherapy in AML. Checkpoint Inhibitors utilizing innate or adaptive immune targeting have shown potential to improve AML outcomes when combined with hypomethylating agents and chemotherapy. The use of adoptive cell therapy in AML demonstrates promising early data, however, there is a need for better target selection. Although early in development, both vaccine therapy as well as stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists have potential to enhance the innate immune response to overcome AML's immune evasion. Immunotherapy has become a promising approach for AML treatment, especially in refractory and relapsed AML, especially in patients who are not eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplants. Future research should focus on a deeper understanding of the immune microenvironment to identify the most critical targets for optimization, as well as personalized therapeutic combination strategies. Here we present a comprehensive overview of the recent developments in immunotherapy for relapsed and refractory AML.

Beyond HMAs: Novel Targets and Therapeutic Approaches

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) constitute a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic disorders with extremely variable clinical features and outcomes. Management of MDS is largely based on risk stratification of patients into either lower-risk or higher-risk categories using the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised and, more recently, on the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System. Lower-risk MDS is often managed with the goal of ameliorating cytopenias and improving quality of life, while higher-risk MDS is treated with therapies aimed at extending survival and delaying progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therapeutic strategies in lower-risk MDS patients may consist of erythropoiesis stimulating agents, luspatercept, and lenalidomide for selected patients. Furthermore, imetelstat has recently been added to the FDA-approved therapeutic armamentarium for lower-risk MDS. In higher-risk MDS, monotherapy with hypomethylating agents continues to be the standard of care. While several novel hypomethylating agent combinations have and are being studied in large randomized phase 3 clinical trials, including the combination of azacitidine and venetoclax, no combination to date have improved overall survival to azacitidine monotherapy. Moreover, biomarker-directed therapies as well as immonotherapeutic approaches are currently being evaluated in early phase trials. Despite recent advancements, the lack of therapeutic agents, particularly after the failure of first line therapy in higher risk MDS, continues to be a major hurdle in the management of MDS. In this review, we discuss the current treatment landscape of MDS and provide an overview of novel agents currently in clinical development that have the potential to alter our current treatment paradigms.

Managing the unmanageable: evidence-driven approaches to real-world patient prototypes of TP53-mutant myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia

Patients with TP53 aberrations comprise the highest risk subset of all myeloid malignancies. The managerial conundrum of TP53-mutant myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) stems from refractoriness to or relapse after conventional chemotherapy, as well as the limited translational success of investigational therapies targeting TP53-mutant cells. Thus far, no targeted therapies have been commercially approved for this mutational subset. As a result, management plans for patients with TP53-mutant MDS and AML are often driven by clinical judgment and/or physician preference rather than consensus guidelines backed by a rigorous evidence basis. This clinical case-based, evidence-driven review highlights the most salient data that guides the management of commonly encountered patient prototypes. This review discusses the therapeutic menu of first-line options that derive from multi-institutional experiences as well as from disease-centric consortia and discusses how these first-line options can be optimally tailored to heterogeneous groups of patients. The debate regarding whether allogeneic stem cell transplant should be offered to these patients is summarized. Finally, this review explores the recent unfortunate news of pauses in clinical trials for the leading investigational agents - eprenetapopt, magrolimab, sabatolimab, and idasanutlin - and offers solutions toward re-invigorating the pipeline of precision therapeutics in 2025.

Cellular and immunotherapies for myelodysplastic syndromes

In this review article, we outline the current landscape of immune and cell therapy-based approaches for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Given the well characterized graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect observed with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, and the known immune escape mechanisms observed in MDS cells, significant interest exists in developing immune-based approaches to treat MDS. These attempts have included antibody-based drugs that block immune escape molecules, such as inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 and TIM-3/galectin-9 axes that mediate interactions between MDS cells and T-lymphocytes, as well as antibodies that block the CD47/SIRPα interaction, which mediates macrophage phagocytosis. Unfortunately, these approaches have been largely unsuccessful. There is significant potential for T-cell engaging therapies and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, but there are also several limitations to these approaches that are unique to MDS. However, many of these limitations may be overcome by the next generation of cellular therapies, including those with engineered T-cell receptors or natural killer (NK)-cell based platforms. Regardless of the approach, all these immune cells are subject to the complex bone marrow microenvironment in MDS, which harbours a variable and heterogeneous mix of pro-inflammatory cytokines and immunosuppressive elements. Understanding this interaction will be paramount to ensuring the success of immune and cellular therapies in MDS.

Infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Infectious complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Preventing infections could significantly improve both survival and quality of life. Unfortunately, both infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with MDS are incompletely assessed due to the heterogeneity of disorders included in each publication, changing definitions over time, and lack of standardized prophylaxis practices. Despite these limitations, some basic statements can be made. Infections in MDS are associated with neutropenia. Patients with lower-risk (LR) MDS tend to have fewer infections compared to patients with higher-risk (HR) MDS, which may be related to the different prevalence of neutropenia in the 2 groups. Pneumonia is the most common infection, and bacteria are the most common pathogens. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are uncommon. Reactivation of latent viruses are rare. With the limited data available, we agree that antibacterial prophylaxis can be considered in patients with HR-MDS during severe neutropenia and early cycles of therapy when infections are most likely to occur. Given the low prevalence of IFI and viral reactivation, antimicrobial prophylaxis for these pathogens is less likely to be advantageous for most patients, although antifungal prophylaxis with activity against mold is commonly used in patients with persistent, profound neutropenia. Ultimately, improved data collection regarding infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis is needed to improve care for patients with MDS.

The Functional Role and Prognostic Significance of TIM-3 Expression on NK Cells in the Diagnostic Bone Marrows in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background: Compared to other immune checkpoint molecules, T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) is highly expressed on natural killer (NK) cells, but its functional role and prognostic significance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the role of TIM-3 expression on the cytotoxic and killing capacity of NK cells and its prognostic significance in AML. Methods: AML public single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data were used to analyze the correlation of transcript levels between HAVCR2 (encoding TIM-3) and cytotoxic molecules in NK cells. NK cells from the bone marrows of seven newly diagnosed AML patients and five healthy donors (HDs) were stimulated in vitro and cell-killing activity was evaluated. A total of one hundred and five newly diagnosed adult AML patients and seven HDs were tested the expression of TIM-3 and cytotoxic molecules on the bone marrow NK cells by multi-parameter flow cytometry (MFC). Results: Both scRNAseq and MFC analysis demonstrated that TIM-3 expression on NK cells was positively related to the levels of perforin (PFP) and granzyme B (GZMB) (all p < 0.05) in AML. It was PFP and GZMB but not the TIM-3 level that was related to NK-cell-killing activity against K562 cells (p = 0.027, 0.042 and 0.55). A high frequency of TIM-3+ NK cells predicted poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS) (p = 0.013 and 0.0074), but was not an independent prognostic factor, whereas low GZMB levels in TIM-3+ NK cells independently predicted poorer RFS (p = 0.0032). Conclusions: TIM-3 expression on NK cells is positively related to PFP and GZMB levels but has no relation to cell-killing activity in AML, and low GZMB levels in TIM-3+ NK cells in the diagnostic bone marrows predicts poor outcomes. This study lays a theoretical foundation for the clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges

Epigenetics governs a chromatin state regulatory system through five key mechanisms: DNA modification, histone modification, RNA modification, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNA regulation. These mechanisms and their associated enzymes convey genetic information independently of DNA base sequences, playing essential roles in organismal development and homeostasis. Conversely, disruptions in epigenetic landscapes critically influence the pathogenesis of various human diseases. This understanding has laid a robust theoretical groundwork for developing drugs that target epigenetics-modifying enzymes in pathological conditions. Over the past two decades, a growing array of small molecule drugs targeting epigenetic enzymes such as DNA methyltransferase, histone deacetylase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, and enhancer of zeste homolog 2, have been thoroughly investigated and implemented as therapeutic options, particularly in oncology. Additionally, numerous epigenetics-targeted drugs are undergoing clinical trials, offering promising prospects for clinical benefits. This review delineates the roles of epigenetics in physiological and pathological contexts and underscores pioneering studies on the discovery and clinical implementation of epigenetics-targeted drugs. These include inhibitors, agonists, degraders, and multitarget agents, aiming to identify practical challenges and promising avenues for future research. Ultimately, this review aims to deepen the understanding of epigenetics-oriented therapeutic strategies and their further application in clinical settings.

Sintilimab plus decitabine for higher-risk treatment-naïve myelodysplastic syndromes: efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of a phase II, single-arm trial

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy combined with azacitidine was feasible in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) with limited sample size of treatment-naïve patients, while the optimization of treatment strategies, including the optimal immune checkpoint inhibitor and hypomethylating agent and possible benefiting population, remained undefined. This study first evaluates the efficacy and safety of sintilimab, a PD-1 blockade, plus decitabine in treatment-naïve higher-risk MDS patients and investigates biomarkers for predicting treatment response.

METHODS

In this phase II, single-arm trial (ChiCTR2100044393), treatment-naïve higher-risk MDS patients with an International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised score >3.5 received sintilimab (200 mg, days 1 and 22) and decitabine (20 mg/m2, day 1-5) over 6-week cycles. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), including complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) or marrow CR.

RESULTS

A total of 54 eligible patients were enrolled and treated, with 25 (46.3%) having very high-risk MDS. Among 53 evaluable patients, the ORR was 77.4% (n=41), including 26.4% CR (n=14). The overall clinical improvement rate (CR, PR, marrow CR or hematological improvement) reached 81.1%. With a median follow-up of 20.0 months, the median event-free survival was 23 months with 12 progressing to acute myeloid leukemia. Median overall survival was not reached. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with hematologic toxicities being the most common adverse events. Biomarker analysis highlighted a negative correlation between T cell exhaustion markers, particularly TIM-3 and PD-1, with ORR.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sintilimab and decitabine shows promise efficacy for higher-risk MDS, with a favorable safety profile. The potential predictive value of T cell exhaustion biomarkers might help screen the possible benefiting population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR210044393.

Membrane Antigen Targeting in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Antibodies or CAR-T Cells

This review explores the emerging area of the therapeutic use of antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Through a detailed analysis of the existing literature, this paper highlights the different categories of AML antigens for immunotherapeutic targeting, the most recent applications on antibodies, including bispecific immune cell engagers and CAR-T cells, to the therapy of patients with refractory/relapsing AML The studies performed in AML patients using BisAbs and CAR-T cells have shown that only a limited number of AML patients show sustained responses to these therapies, thus underlying AML heterogeneity as a major challenge. Several studies have addressed the potential mechanisms underlying the resistance of AMLs to antibody-directed immunotherapies. A better understanding of the barriers hampering the successful development of AML immunotherapy is required. However, in spite of the limitations, the studies recently carried out have shown the peculiar sensitivity of some AML subtypes to immunotherapy and have provided the basis for future studies, such as multiplex antigen targeting, which hold the promise of successful development.

Current challenges in conditioning regimens for MDS transplantation

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a very heterogeneous clonal disorder. Patients with "higher-risk" MDS, defined by specific recurrent genetic abnormalities, have a poor prognosis because of a high risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia with low chemosensitivity. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment that offers durable disease control because the donor immune system allows graft-versus-MDS effects. In terms of preparation steps before transplantation, targeting the malignant clone by increasing the conditioning regimen intensity is still a matter of intense debate. MDS is mainly diagnosed in older patients, and high toxicity related to common myeloablative conditioning regimens has been reported. Efforts to include new drugs in the conditioning regimen to achieve the best malignant clone control without increasing toxicity have been made over the past 20 years. We summarized these retrospective and prospective studies and evaluated the limitations of the available evidence to delineate the ideal conditioning regimen.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: An Update on Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are clonal myeloid neoplasms that cause life-limiting complications from severe cytopenias and leukemic transformation. Efforts to better classify, prognosticate, and assess therapeutic responses in HR-MDS have resulted in publication of new clinical tools in the last several years. Given limited current treatment options and suboptimal outcomes, HR-MDS stands to benefit from the study of investigational agents.Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal myeloid-lineage malignancies often characterized by high-risk genetic lesions, increased blood transfusion needs, constitutional symptoms, elevated risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and therapeutic need for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Use of blast percentage and other morphologic features to define myelodysplastic neoplasm subtypes is rapidly shifting to incorporate genetics, resulting in a subset of former HR-MDS patients now being considered as AML in presence of leukemia-defining genetic alterations. A proliferation of prognostic tools has further focused use of genetic features to drive decision making in clinical management. Recently, criteria to assess response of HR-MDS to therapy were revised to incorporate more clinically meaningful endpoints and better match AML response criteria. Basic science investigations have resulted in improved understanding of the relationship between MDS genetic lesions, bone marrow stromal changes, germline predispositions, and disease phenotype. However, therapeutic advances have been more limited. There has been import of the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib, initially approved for AML; the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax and liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351) are under active investigation as well. Unfortunately, effective treatment of TP53-mutated disease remains elusive, though preliminary evidence suggests improved outcomes with oral decitabine/cedazuridine over parenteral hypomethylating agent monotherapy. Investigational agents with novel mechanisms of action may help expand the repertoire of treatment options for HR-MDS and trials continue to offer a hopeful therapeutic avenue for suitable patients.

Advances in the management of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: future prospects

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are defined using a number of prognostic scoring systems that include the degree of cytopenias, percentage of blasts, cytogenetic alterations, and more recently genomic data. HR-MDS encompasses characteristics such as progressive cytopenias, increased bone marrow blasts, unfavorable cytogenetics, and an adverse mutational profile. Survival is generally poor, and patients require therapy to improve outcomes. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), such as azacitidine, decitabine, and more recently, oral decitabine/cedazuridine, are the only approved therapies for HR-MDS. These are often continued until loss of response, progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Combinations including an HMA plus other drugs have been investigated but have not demonstrated better outcomes compared to single-agent HMA. Moreover, in a disease of high genomic complexity such as HR-MDS, therapy targeting specific genomic abnormalities is of interest. This review will examine the biological underpinnings of HR-MDS, its therapeutic landscape in the frontline and relapsed settings, as well as the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only known curative intervention for this disease.

Impact of p53-associated acute myeloid leukemia hallmarks on metabolism and the immune environment

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive malignancy of hematopoietic stem cells, is characterized by the blockade of cell differentiation, uncontrolled proliferation, and cell expansion that impairs healthy hematopoiesis and results in pancytopenia and susceptibility to infections. Several genetic and chromosomal aberrations play a role in AML and influence patient outcomes. TP53 is a key tumor suppressor gene involved in a variety of cell features, such as cell-cycle regulation, genome stability, proliferation, differentiation, stem-cell homeostasis, apoptosis, metabolism, senescence, and the repair of DNA damage in response to cellular stress. In AML, TP53 alterations occur in 5%-12% of de novo AML cases. These mutations form an important molecular subgroup, and patients with these mutations have the worst prognosis and shortest overall survival among patients with AML, even when treated with aggressive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplant. The frequency of TP53-mutations increases in relapsed and recurrent AML and is associated with chemoresistance. Progress in AML genetics and biology has brought the novel therapies, however, the clinical benefit of these agents for patients whose disease is driven by TP53 mutations remains largely unexplored. This review focuses on the molecular characteristics of TP53-mutated disease; the impact of TP53 on selected hallmarks of leukemia, particularly metabolic rewiring and immune evasion, the clinical importance of TP53 mutations; and the current progress in the development of preclinical and clinical therapeutic strategies to treat TP53-mutated disease.

T-cell dysfunctions in myelodysplastic syndromes

ABSTRACT

Escape from immune surveillance is a hallmark of cancer. Immune deregulation caused by intrinsic and extrinsic cellular factors, such as altered T-cell functions, leads to immune exhaustion, loss of immune surveillance, and clonal proliferation of tumoral cells. The T-cell immune system contributes to the pathogenesis, maintenance, and progression of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Here, we comprehensively reviewed our current biological knowledge of the T-cell compartment in MDS and recent advances in the development of immunotherapeutic strategies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and T-cell- and antibody-based adoptive therapies that hold promise to improve the outcome of patients with MDS.

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous clonal disorder of hemopoietic stem cells characterized by cytomorphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our understanding of this disease has continued to evolve over the last century. More recently, prognostication and treatment have been determined by cytogenetic and molecular data. Specific genetic abnormalities, such as deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)), TP53 inactivation and SF3B1 mutation, are increasingly associated with disease phenotype and outcome, as reflected in the recently updated fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO5) and the International Consensus Classification 2022 (ICC 2022) classification systems. Treatment of lower-risk MDS is primarily symptom directed to ameliorate cytopenias. Higher-risk disease warrants disease-directed therapy at diagnosis; however, the only possible cure is an allogenic bone marrow transplant. Novel treatments aimed at rational molecular and cellular pathway targets have yielded a number of candidate drugs over recent years; however few new approvals have been granted. With ongoing research, we hope to increasingly offer our MDS patients tailored therapeutic approaches, ultimately decreasing morbidity and mortality.