Risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes associated with rheumatoid arthritis and phenotypic subgroups: a retrospective, comparative, multicentre cohort study

Dissecting clinical features of COVID-19 in a cohort of 21,312 acute care patients

BACKGROUND

Although, COVID-19 has resulted in over 7 million deaths globally, many questions still remain about the risk factors for disease severity and the effects of variants and vaccinations over the course of the pandemic. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records from COVID-19 patients over 2.5 years of the COVID-19 pandemic to identify associated clinical features.

METHODS

We analyze a retrospective cohort of 21,312 acute-care patients over a 2.5 year period and define six clinical trajectory groups (TGs) associated with demographics, diagnoses, vitals, labs, imaging, consultations, and medications.

RESULTS

We show that the proportion of mild patients increased over time, particularly during Omicron waves. Additionally, while mild and fatal patients had differences in age, age did not distinguish patients with severe versus critical disease. Furthermore, we find that both male sex and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity are associated with more severe/critical TGs. More severe patients also have a higher rate of neuropsychiatric diagnoses and consultations, along with an immunological signature of high neutrophils and immature granulocytes, and low lymphocytes and monocytes. Interestingly, low albumin is one of the best lab predictors of COVID-19 severity in association with higher malnutrition in severe/critical patients, raising concern of nutritional insufficiency influencing COVID-19 outcomes. Despite this, only a small fraction of severe/critical patients had nutritional labs checked (e.g. Vitamin D, thiamine, B vitamins) or received vitamin supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings expand on clinical risk factors in COVID-19, and highlight the interaction between severity, nutritional status, and neuropsychiatric complications in acute care patients to enable identification of patients at risk for severe disease.

Association between pre-existing chronic conditions and severity of first SARS-CoV-2 infection symptoms among adults living in Canada: a population-based survey analysis from January 2020 to August 2022

BACKGROUND

Individuals living with chronic conditions (CC) typically have a higher risk of more severe outcomes when exposed to infection. Although many studies have investigated the relationship between CCs and COVID-19 severity, they are generally limited to clinical or hospitalized populations. There is a need to estimate the impact of pre-existing CCs on the severity of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection symptoms among the general population.

METHODS

Data from the Canadian COVID-19 Antibody and Health Survey - Cycle 2, a population-based cross-sectional probability survey across 10 provinces capturing the COVID-19 experiences of respondents from January 2020 to August 2022, were used to assess whether pre-existing CCs increased the odds of more severe self-reported infection symptoms among adults living in Canada. Multivariable regression modelling identified which CCs were independently associated with more severe infection symptoms after adjusting for sex, age at infection, and other significant covariates.

RESULTS

Chronic lung disease (aOR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.46), high blood pressure (aOR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.62), weakened immune system (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.98), chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia (aOR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.39, 3.50), and arthritis (aOR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.56) were associated with a higher odds of more severe infection, whereas osteoporosis (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.87) was associated with a lower odds. Limiting modelling to adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections affected some of the variables retained and adjusted associations.

CONCLUSION

Our findings contribute to a growing evidence base of associations between pre-existing CCs and adverse outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Identifying factors associated with more severe infection allows for more targeted prevention strategies and early interventions that can minimize the impact of infection.

Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases remain at risk for hospitalisation for COVID-19 infection in the Omicron era (2022-2024): a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors for severe acute COVID-19 outcomes in the Omicron era among individuals with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).

METHODS

We identified patients with confirmed SARDs and COVID-19 (positive PCR and/or antigen test) from 1 September 2022 to 15 March 2024 in the Mass General Brigham healthcare system. We estimated the associations of baseline characteristics with the odds of hospitalisation due to COVID-19 infection, verified by medical record review, using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 2061 patients with SARDs and COVID-19 during the Omicron era (75% female, mean age 62.2 years), 134 (6.5%) were hospitalised due to COVID-19, mostly due to respiratory symptoms (84, 63%). Of those hospitalised, 11 (8%) required mechanical ventilation and 20 (15%) died. Older age (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.05 per year), Black race (vs White race, aOR 4.15), ever smoking (vs never, aOR 1.76), CD20 inhibitor use (vs antimalarial monotherapy, aOR 2.22) and glucocorticoid use (vs non-use, aOR 2.07) were significantly associated with higher odds of hospitalisation. Female sex (vs male, aOR 0.63), booster SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (vs initial series, aOR 0.49) and vaccination within either 3 months or 3-6 months prior to infection (aOR 0.41 and aOR 0.38, respectively, vs none within 12 months) were significantly associated with lower odds of hospitalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Some patients with SARDs remain at higher risk of severe COVID-19 in the Omicron era. Patients who are older, Black, have more comorbidities, use CD20 inhibitors and/or glucocorticoids, or have not been vaccinated recently may benefit from risk-mitigating strategies, including booster vaccines and pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: An appraisal of the 2023 ACR/CHEST guideline

Purpose of review

To summarize the current treatment landscape of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) in the context of the recent 2023 American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians guideline for ILD treatment in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Recent findings

The guideline conditionally recommends mycophenolate, azathioprine, and rituximab for first-line RA-ILD therapy, with cyclophosphamide and short-term glucocorticoids as additional options. For RA-ILD progression after first line, mycophenolate, rituximab, nintedanib, tocilizumab, cyclophosphamide, and pirfenidone are conditionally recommended, while long-term glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended against. Only three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolled patients with RA-ILD (total n=217). All other recommendations for RA-ILD were based on RCTs for other diseases or observational data. Antifibrotics might be particularly effective for patients with RA-ILD and the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (RA-UIP). There is uncertainty of the utility of azathioprine and glucocorticoids in RA-UIP since these medications had worse outcomes compared to placebo in an RCT of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. RA-ILD treatment decisions should consider articular activity, ILD activity, comorbidities, and potential for infection.

Summary

We summarized the current treatment landscape for RA-ILD. Since only three RCTs included patients with RA-ILD, most guideline recommendations were conditional and based on low-quality evidence. This highlights the urgent need for additional high-quality RCT data for efficacy and safety of anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic medications for RA-ILD.

Rheumatoid arthritis and COVID-19 outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the risk and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed across four electronic databases. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle‒Ottawa quality assessment scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 14 software.

RESULTS

A total of 62 studies were included in the analysis. First, the meta-analysis revealed the following prevalence rates among rheumatoid arthritis patients: COVID-19, 11%; severe COVID-19, 18%; COVID-19-related hospitalization, 29%; admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to COVID-19, 10%; and death from COVID-19, 8%. Second, rheumatoid arthritis was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection (OR 1.045(0.969-1.122), p = 0.006), COVID-19-related hospitalization (OR 1.319(1.055-1.584), p = 0.006), admission to the ICU due to COVID-19 (OR 1.498(1.145-1.850), p = 0.002), and death from COVID-19 (OR 1.377(1.168-1.587), p = 0.001). Third, no statistically significant association was found between rheumatoid arthritis and severe COVID-19 (OR 1.354(1.002-1.706), p = 0.135).

CONCLUSIONS

Rheumatoid arthritis patients have a significantly greater risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, ICU admission, and death than individuals without rheumatoid arthritis. However, rheumatoid arthritis did not show a significant association with the risk of severe COVID-19. These findings underscore the need for tailored management strategies and vigilant monitoring of COVID-19 outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The study has been registered on PROSPERO [ https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ], and the registration number is CRD42024528119.

Exploring the Linkages Among Chronic Illness, Substance Use, and COVID-19 Infection in Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Representative Data

BACKGROUND

The co-occurrence of chronic illnesses and substance use presents complex challenges for health care systems. Understanding the interplay between these factors, compounded by the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, is essential for effective intervention strategies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the relationships among chronic illness, substance use, and COVID-19 infection in adults aged 50 years and older.

METHODS

Participants were 1196 adults aged 50 years and older. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic information. Logistic regressions and multiple regression analyses were used to determine associations between chronic illnesses, substance use, and COVID-19 infection. Mediation analysis was used to determine the effect of chronic illness mediators in the association between COVID-19 concerns and substance use.

RESULTS

The mean age was 68 (SD 10.3) years, with 58.6% (701/1196) being women. Adjusted analysis revealed that age and sex (women) significantly predicted a lower level of substance use (P<.05). However, marital status (separated or widowed) and chronic illness significantly predicted a higher level of substance use (P<.05). Furthermore, having dementia, arthritis, and high cholesterol significantly predicted a higher level of concern about the COVID-19 pandemic (P<.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that individuals with hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.37-2.66; P<.001), lung disease (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.23-4.75; P=.01), heart condition (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.28-3.10; P=.002), stroke (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.07-5.16; P=.03), and arthritis (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.25-2.37; P=.001) were more likely to have their work affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The mediation analysis showed a significant effect of COVID-19 concern on substance use through the mediation of chronic illness, with a 95% CI of -0.02 to -0.01 and an indirect effect of -0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals complex associations among chronic illnesses, substance use, and COVID-19 infection among adults aged 50 years and older. It underscores the impact of demographics and specific chronic conditions on substance use behaviors and COVID-19 concerns. In addition, certain chronic illnesses were linked to heightened vulnerability in employment status during the pandemic. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions addressing physical health and substance use in this population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prospective Variation of Cytokine Trends during COVID-19: A Progressive Approach from Disease Onset until Outcome

COVID-19 is characterized by pronounced hypercytokinemia. The cytokine switch, marked by an imbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, emerged as a focal point of investigation throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the kinetics and temporal dynamics of cytokine release remain contradictory, making the development of new therapeutics difficult, especially in severe cases. This study collected serum samples from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients at 72 h intervals and monitored them for various cytokines at each timepoint until hospital discharge or death. Cytokine levels were analyzed based on time since symptom onset and patient outcomes. All cytokines studied prospectively were strong predictors of mortality, particularly IL-4 (AUC = 0.98) and IL-1β (AUC = 0.96). First-timepoint evaluations showed elevated cytokine levels in the mortality group (p < 0.001). Interestingly, IFN-γ levels decreased over time in the death group but increased in the survival group. Patients who died exhibited sustained levels of IL-1β and IL-4 and increased IL-6 levels over time. These findings suggest cytokine elevation is crucial in predicting COVID-19 mortality. The dynamic interplay between IFN-γ and IL-4 highlights the balance between Th1/Th2 immune responses and underscores IFN-γ as a powerful indicator of immune dysregulation throughout the infection.

Community-engaged randomised controlled trial to disseminate COVID-19 vaccine-related information and increase uptake among Black individuals in two US cities with rheumatic conditions

INTRODUCTION

Inequities in COVID-19 infection and vaccine uptake among historically marginalised racial and ethnic groups in the USA persist. Individuals with rheumatic conditions, especially those who are immunocompromised, are especially vulnerable to severe infection, with significant racialised inequities in infection outcomes and in vaccine uptake. Structural racism, historical injustices and misinformation engender racial and ethnic inequities in vaccine uptake. The Popular Opinion Lleader (POL) model, a community-based intervention that trains trusted community leaders to disseminate health information to their social network members (eg, friends, family and neighbours), has been shown to reduce stigma and improve care-seeking behaviours.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a community-based cluster randomised controlled trial led by a team of community and academic partners to compare the efficacy of training POLs with rheumatic or musculoskeletal conditions using a curriculum embedded with a racial justice vs a biomedical framework to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake and reduce vaccine hesitancy. This trial began recruitment in February 2024 in Boston, Massachusetts and Chicago, Illinois, USA. Eligible POLs are English-speaking adults who identify as Black and/or of African descent, have a diagnosis of a rheumatic or musculoskeletal condition and have received >=1 COVID-19 vaccine after 31 August 2022. POLs will be randomised to a 6-module virtual educational training; the COVID-19 and vaccine-related content will be the same for both groups however the framing for arm 1 will be with a racial justice lens and for arm 2, a biomedical preventative care-focused lens. Following the training, POLs will disseminate the information they learned to 12-16 social network members who have not received the most recent COVID-19 vaccine, over 4 weeks. The trial's primary outcome is social network member COVID-19 vaccine uptake, which will be compared between intervention arms.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has ethical approval in the USA. This has been approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board (IRB, 2023P000686), the Northwestern University IRB (STU00219053), the Boston University/Boston Medical Center IRB (H-43857) and the Boston Children's Hospital IRB (P00045404). Results will be published in a publicly accessible peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05822219.

A community-engaged approach to translate a Vaccine Hesitancy Scale into Haitian Creole

OBJECTIVE

Accurately translated health materials are needed to achieve equity in vaccine uptake among U.S. individuals with non-English language preferences. Verbatim translations may not capture the cultural and linguistic vernacular required to understand vaccine hesitancy. We leveraged a community-engaged approach to translate the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS) into Haitian Creole.

METHODS

Following the "WHO Guidelines on Translation and Adaptation of Instruments" and a community-engaged framework, a validated 10-question Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS) underwent forward translation, expert panel review, back translation, and focus group pilot testing.

RESULTS

Haitian Creole-speaking translators included two community leaders, one community partner, one study team member, and 13 Haitian, greater Boston-based community members who participated in a focus group to pretest the survey. After four iterations, a linguistic and cultural translation of the VHS was created.

CONCLUSION

A community-engaged framework strengthened community partnerships and resulted in a culturally relevant Haitian Creole vaccine hesitancy scale.

Outcomes of COVID-19 Omicron variant in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide Greek cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with RA were at increased risk for COVID-19-associated hospitalization and death during the first year of the pandemic in Greece. We aimed to examine their outcomes after the SARS-Cov-2 Omicron, a more contagious but with milder clinical impacts variant, prevailed.

METHODS

A retrospective, nationwide study was conducted between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2022 in all RA patients under treatment and matched (1:5) on age, sex and region of domicile random general population comparators. Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations and deaths, anti-rheumatic medications, prior COVID-19, vaccinations and anti-viral medications were recorded.

RESULTS

Among 34 182 RA patients, infections (n = 5569, 16.29%), hospitalizations (n = 489, 1.43%) and deaths (n = 106, 0.31%) were more frequent than among comparators. Incidence rates per 1000 person/years of infection [IRR (95% CI):1.19 (1.16, 1.23)], hospitalization [IRR (95% CI):2.0 (1.82, 2.24)], and death [IRR (95% CI):1.81 (1.44, 2.27)] were increased in RA despite better vaccination coverage (89% vs 84%) and more frequent use of anti-viral medications (2.37% vs 1.08). Logistic regression analysis after correcting for age, sex, vaccinations, prior COVID-19, and anti-viral medications in SARS-CoV-2 infected RA patients and comparators revealed increased risk of hospitalization (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.79, 2.27) and death [OR: 1.73, (95% CI: 1.36, 2.20)] in RA. Among infected RA patients, rituximab treatment conferred increased risks for hospitalization [OR: 6.12, (95% CI: 2.89, 12.92)] and death [OR: 12.06 (95% CI: 3.90, 37.31)], while JAK inhibitors increased only hospitalization risk [OR: 2.18 (95% CI: 1.56, 3.06)].

CONCLUSION

RA remains a risk factor for hospitalization and death in an era of a relatively low COVID-19 fatality rate, pointing to the need of perseverance in vaccination programs and wider use of anti-viral medications.

Rate of severe and fatal infections in a cohort of patients with interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter prospective study

Objective

To describe severe infection, foci of infection, microorganisms, associated factors, and impact on mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

Patients and methods

The study was based on a multicenter prospective cohort of patients with RA-ILD followed up from 2015 to 2023. The main outcome measures were incident severe infection and fatal infection. We evaluated infectious foci, etiologic agents, vaccination status, variables associated with lung function, and clinical-therapeutic variables in RA. The incidence rate (IR) for infection and mortality was calculated per 100 person-years, and 3 multivariate models were constructed to explore factors associated with infection.

Results

We followed up 148 patients with RA-ILD for a median 56.7 months (699.3 person-years). During this period, 142 patients (96%) had at least 1 infection. A total of 368 infectious episodes were recorded, with an IR of 52.6 per 100 person-years. Of the 48 patients who died, 65% did so from infection. Respiratory infections were the most common first infection (74%), infection overall (74%), and fatal infection (80%) and were caused mostly by SARS CoV-2, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and influenza A virus. The factors associated with an increased risk of infection and death in patients with RA-ILD were age, inflammatory activity, and therapy with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants.

Conclusion

Patients with RA-ILD have a high risk of serious infection, especially respiratory infection. Infection develops early, is recurrent, and is frequently fatal. The presence of associated factors such as advanced age, joint inflammation, and treatment highlight the importance of integrated and preventive medical care.

Disparities in COVID-19 mortality amongst the immunosuppressed: A systematic review and meta-analysis for enhanced disease surveillance

BACKGROUND

Effective disease surveillance, including that for COVID-19, is compromised without a standardised method for categorising the immunosuppressed as a clinical risk group.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether excess COVID-associated mortality compared to the immunocompetent could meaningfully subdivide the immunosuppressed. Our study adhered to UK Immunisation against infectious disease (Green Book) criteria for defining and categorising immunosuppression. Using OVID (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Transplant Library, and Global Health), PubMed, and Google Scholar, we examined relevant literature between the entirety of 2020 and 2022. We selected for cohort studies that provided mortality data for immunosuppressed subgroups and immunocompetent comparators. Meta-analyses, grey literature and any original works that failed to provide comparator data or reported all-cause or paediatric outcomes were excluded. Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of COVID-19 mortality were meta-analysed by immunosuppressed category and subcategory. Subgroup analyses differentiated estimates by effect measure, country income, study setting, level of adjustment, use of matching and publication year. Study screening, extraction and bias assessment were performed blinded and independently by two researchers; conflicts were resolved with the oversight of a third researcher. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022360755.

FINDINGS

We identified 99 unique studies, incorporating data from 1,542,097 and 56,248,181 unique immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients with COVID-19 infection, respectively. Compared to immunocompetent people (pooled OR, 95%CI), solid organ transplants (2.12, 1.50-2.99) and malignancy (2.02, 1.69-2.42) patients had a very high risk of COVID-19 mortality. Patients with rheumatological conditions (1.28, 1.13-1.45) and HIV (1.20, 1.05-1.36) had just slightly higher risks than the immunocompetent baseline. Case type, setting income and mortality data matching and adjustment were significant modifiers of excess immunosuppressed mortality for some immunosuppressed subgroups.

INTERPRETATION

Excess COVID-associated mortality among the immunosuppressed compared to the immunocompetent was seen to vary significantly across subgroups. This novel means of subdivision has prospective benefit for targeting patient triage, shielding and vaccination policies during periods of high disease transmission.

Beneficial effect of temporary methotrexate interruption on B and T cell responses upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis

B and T cell responses were evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) after 1 or 2 weeks of methotrexate (MTX) withdrawal following each COVID-19 vaccine dose and compared with those who maintained MTX. Adult RA and PsA patients treated with MTX were recruited and randomly assigned to 3 groups: MTX-maintenance (n = 72), MTX-withdrawal for 1 week (n = 71) or MTX-withdrawal for 2 weeks (n = 73). Specific antibodies to several SARS-CoV-2 antigens and interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-21 responses were assessed. MTX withdrawal in patients without previous COVID-19 was associated with higher levels of anti-RBD IgG and neutralising antibodies, especially in the 2-week withdrawal group and with higher IFN-γ secretion upon stimulation with pools of SARS-CoV-2 S peptides. No increment of RA/PsA relapses was detected across groups. Our data indicate that two-week MTX interruption following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with RA or PsA improves humoral and cellular immune responses.

Single-cell multi-omics analysis of COVID-19 patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases shows aberrant immune responses to infection

In COVID-19, hyperinflammatory and dysregulated immune responses contribute to severity. Patients with pre-existing autoimmune conditions can therefore be at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and/or associated sequelae, yet SARS-CoV-2 infection in this group has been little studied. Here, we performed single-cell analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with three major autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, or multiple sclerosis) during SARS-CoV-2 infection. We observed compositional differences between the autoimmune disease groups coupled with altered patterns of gene expression, transcription factor activity, and cell-cell communication that substantially shape the immune response under SARS-CoV-2 infection. While enrichment of HLA-DRlow CD14+ monocytes was observed in all three autoimmune disease groups, type-I interferon signaling as well as inflammatory T cell and monocyte responses varied widely between the three groups of patients. Our results reveal disturbed immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with pre-existing autoimmunity, highlighting important considerations for disease treatment and follow-up.

Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Utilization for the Treatment of Non-hospitalized Adults with COVID-19 in the National Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System

INTRODUCTION

Limited data exist regarding real-world utilization of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. We identified predictors of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use among Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatients nationally.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were eligible to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir between January and December of 2022, to identify factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use (i.e., demographics, medical history, prior medication and healthcare exposures, frailty, and other clinical characteristics) using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

We included 309,755 outpatients with COVID-19 who were eligible for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, of whom 12.2% received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir uptake increased from 1.1% to 23.2% over the study period. Factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir receipt included receiving a COVID-19 booster vs. none (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.19 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-2.26]), age ≥ 50 vs. 18-49 years (aORs > 1.5 for all age groups ≥ 50 years), having HIV (aOR 1.36 [1.22-1.51]), being non-frail vs. severely frail (aOR 1.22 [1.13-1.33]), and having rheumatoid arthritis (aOR 1.12 [1.04-1.21). Those with concomitant use of potentially interacting antiarrhythmics (aOR 0.35 [0.28-0.45]), anticoagulants/antiplatelets (aOR 0.42 [0.40-0.45]), and/or psychiatric/sedatives (aOR 0.84 [0.81-0.87]) were less likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increases over time, overall utilization of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was low. Predictors of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir utilization were consistent with known risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19, including older age and underlying medical conditions. Unvaccinated and undervaccinated patients and those receiving potentially interacting medications for cardiovascular or mental health conditions (antiarrhythmic, alpha-1 antagonist, anticoagulant/antiplatelet, sedative/hypnotic/psychiatric) were less likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Further education of prescribers and patients about nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment guidelines is needed to improve overall uptake and utilization in certain high-risk subpopulations.

Immunomodulatory drugs have divergent effects on humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in people living with rheumatoid arthritis

Understanding the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in people on immunosuppressive drugs, including those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is critical for their protection. Vaccine induced protection requires antibodies, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells, but it is unclear if these are equally affected by immunomodulatory drugs. Here, we determined how humoral and cellular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses differed between people with RA and controls, and which drug classes impacted these responses. Blood was collected from participants with RA on immunomodulatory drugs and controls after their second, third, and fourth SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific antibodies were quantified by ELISA. Spike-specific memory T cells were quantitated using flow cytometry. Linear mixed models assessed the impact of age, sex, and immunomodulatory drug classes on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses. Compared to non-RA controls (n = 35), participants with RA on immunomodulatory drugs (n = 62) had lower anti-RBD IgG and spike-specific CD4+ T cell levels, but no deficits in spike-specific CD8+ T cells, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Use of costimulation inhibitors was associated with lower humoral responses. JAK inhibitors were associated with fewer spike-specific CD4+ T cells. Participants with RA on immunomodulatory drugs mounted weaker responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with different drug classes impacting the cellular and humoral compartments.

Risk factors and outcomes for repeat COVID-19 infection among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate risk factors and outcomes of repeat COVID-19 infections among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).

METHODS

We performed a case-control study investigating repeat COVID-19 infection within the Mass General Brigham Health Care System. We systematically identified all SARD patients with confirmed COVID-19 (15/Mar/2020 to 17/Oct/2022). Cases had confirmed repeat COVID-19 infections >60 days apart (index date: repeat COVID-19 date). Controls were matched to cases (up to 3:1) by calendar date of first infection and duration between first COVID-19 infection and index dates. We collected demographics, lifestyle, comorbidities, SARD features, and COVID-19 characteristics at initial infection and index date by medical record review. We used conditional logistic regression to identify associations with repeat COVID-19 infection, adjusting for potential confounders. We described the severity of repeat COVID-19 infection among cases.

RESULTS

Among 2203 SARD patients with COVID-19, we identified 76 cases with repeat COVID-19 infection (80.3 % female) and matched to 207 matched controls (77.8 % female) with no repeat infection. At first infection, cases were younger (mean 49.5 vs. 60.3 years, p < 0.0001), less likely to have hypertension (32.9 % vs. 45.9 %, p = 0.050), and less likely to have been hospitalized for COVID-19 (13.2 % vs. 24.6 %, p = 0.037) than controls. At index date, cases were more likely than controls to be rituximab users (18.4 % vs. 6.3 %, p = 0.0021). In the multivariable model, younger age (OR 0.67 per 10 years, 95 %CI 0.54-0.82), rituximab use vs. non-use (OR 3.38, 95 %CI 1.26-9.08), and methotrexate use vs. non-use (OR 2.24, 95 %CI 1.08-4.61) were each associated with repeat COVID-19 infection. Among those with repeat COVID-19 infection, 5/76 (6.6 %) were hospitalized and there were no deaths.

CONCLUSION

Younger age, rituximab, and methotrexate were each associated with repeat COVID-19 infection risk among patients with SARDs. Reassuringly, there were no deaths, and the hospitalization rate was low among those with repeat COVID-19 infection.

Understanding Stakeholders' Perspectives to Increase COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake Among Black Individuals With Rheumatic Conditions

OBJECTIVE

Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine and booster uptake persist. This study aimed to obtain perspectives from community and physician stakeholders on COVID-19 vaccine and booster hesitancy and strategies to promote vaccine uptake among Black individuals with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions.

METHODS

We invited community leaders and physicians in greater Boston and Chicago to participate in semi-structured interviews using a moderator guide developed a priori. Participants were queried about how to best address vaccine hesitancy, strategies to target high-risk populations, and factors to identify future community leaders. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using Dedoose.

RESULTS

A total of 8 physicians and 12 community leaders participated in this study between November 2021 and October 2022. Qualitative analyses revealed misinformation/mixed messaging and mistrust, with subthemes including conspiracy theories, concerns regarding vaccine development and function, racism and historical injustices, and general mistrust of health care systems as the top cited reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Participants also shared demographic-specific differences, such as race, ethnicity, age, and gender that influenced the identified themes, with emphasis on COVID-19 vaccine access and apathy. Strategies for community-based vaccine-related information dissemination included personal storytelling with an iterative and empathetic approach, while recognizing the importance of protecting community leader well-being.

CONCLUSION

To increase vaccine uptake among Black individuals with rheumatic conditions, strategies should acknowledge and respond to racial/ethnic and socioeconomic injustices that engender vaccine hesitancy. Messaging should be compassionate, individually tailored, and recognize heterogeneity in experiences and opinions. Results from these analyses will inform a planned community-based intervention in Boston and Chicago.

Considerations for Pharmacologic Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis in the COVID-19 Era: a Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the impact of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on COVID-19 severity and vaccine immunogenicity and to discuss COVID-19 outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Rituximab is associated with severe COVID-19 and impaired vaccine immunogenicity via its B cell-depleting mechanism. JAK inhibitors and glucocorticoids have been modestly associated with severe COVID-19 and impaired vaccine immunogenicity. TNF inhibitors may have a protective effect against severe COVID-19 and do not appear to affect vaccine immunogenicity. Clinical trials have shown improved seroconversion and antibody titers when methotrexate is held around vaccine doses, but this may yield increased risk of RA flare. Patients with RA are also impacted by DMARD disruption, RA flares, and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 after COVID-19 infection. Given the risks of COVID-19, rituximab should be used with caution in RA. Holding methotrexate doses around COVID-19 vaccination improves immunogenicity but may increase RA flare risk.

Outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals with and without inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a Danish nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

In a setting with an extensive SARS-CoV-2 test strategy and availability of effective vaccines, we aimed to investigate if patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) face greater risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and have a worse prognosis of increased risk of hospitalisation, assisted ventilation and death compared with the general population.

METHODS

This was a nationwide, population-based register study that compared outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Danish patients with IRD (n=66 840) with matched population controls (n=668 400). The study period was from March 2020 to January 2023. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for SARS-CoV-2-related outcomes.

RESULTS

We observed a difference in time to first and second positive SARS-CoV-2 test in patients with IRD compared with the general population (IRR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.07) and (IRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.27). The risks of hospital contact with COVID-19 and severe COVID-19 were increased in patients with IRD compared with population controls (IRR 2.11, 95% CI 1.99 to 2.23) and (IRR 2.18, 95% CI 1.94 to 2.45). The risks of assisted ventilation (IRR 2.33, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.87) and COVID-19 leading to death were increased (IRR 1.98, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.33). Patients with IRD had more comorbidities compared with the general population. A third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with a reduced need for hospitalisation with COVID-19 and reduced the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IRD have a risk of SARS-CoV-2, which nearly corresponds to the general population but had a substantial increased risk of hospitalisation with COVID-19, severe COVID-19, requiring assisted ventilation and COVID-19 leading to death, especially in patients with comorbidities.

Hospitalization, Critical Illness, and Mortality Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with COVID-19.

METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of 361 patients with RA+ and 45,954 patients with RA- (March 2020 to August 2022) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase-chain-reaction in the Montefiore Health System, which serves a large low-income, minority-predominant population in the Bronx and was an epicenter of the initial pandemic and subsequent surges. Primary outcomes were hospitalization, critical illness, and all-cause mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Comparisons were made with and without adjustment for covariates, as well as with 1083 matched controls of patients with RA- and COVID-19.

RESULTS

Patients with RA+ and COVID-19 were older (62.2 ± 23.5 vs. 45.5 ± 26.3; P < 0.001), were more likely females (83.1% vs. 55.8%; P < 0.001), were Black (35.5% vs. 30.3%; P < 0.05), and had higher rates of comorbidities (P < 0.05), hospitalization (52.4% vs. 32.5%; P < 0.005), critical illness (10.5% vs. 6.9%; P < 0.05), and mortality (11.1% vs. 6.2%; P < 0.01) compared with patients with RA- and COVID-19. Patients with RA+ with COVID-19 had higher odds of critical illness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.93; P = 0.008) but no differences in hospitalization (aOR = 1.18 [95% CI: 0.93-1.49]; P = 0.16) and mortality (aOR = 1.34 [95% CI: 0.92-1.89]; P = 0.10) after adjusting for covariates. Odds ratio analysis identified age, hospitalization status, female sex, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Black race to be significant risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality. Pre-COVID-19 steroid and biologic therapy to treat RA were not significantly associated with worse outcomes (P > 0.05). Outcomes were not different between patients with RA+ and propensity-matched RA- controls (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that risk factors for adverse COVID-19 outcomes were not attributed to RA per se but rather age and preexisting medical conditions of patients with RA.

Development of nanozymes for promising alleviation of COVID-19-associated arthritis

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has been identified as a culprit in the development of a variety of disorders, including arthritis. Although the emergence of arthritis following SARS-CoV-2 infection may not be immediately discernible, its underlying pathogenesis is likely to involve a complex interplay of infections, oxidative stress, immune responses, abnormal production of inflammatory factors, cellular destruction, etc. Fortunately, recent advancements in nanozymes with enzyme-like activities have shown potent antiviral effects and the ability to inhibit oxidative stress and cytokines and provide immunotherapeutic effects while also safeguarding diverse cell populations. These adaptable nanozymes have already exhibited efficacy in treating common types of arthritis, and their distinctive synergistic therapeutic effects offer great potential in the fight against arthritis associated with COVID-19. In this comprehensive review, we explore the potential of nanozymes in alleviating arthritis following SARS-CoV-2 infection by neutralizing the underlying factors associated with the disease. We also provide a detailed analysis of the common therapeutic pathways employed by these nanozymes and offer insights into how they can be further optimized to effectively address COVID-19-associated arthritis.

Acute and postacute COVID-19 outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: lessons learned and emerging directions 3 years into the pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the findings of studies investigating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and risk of acute and postacute COVID-19 outcomes 3 years into the pandemic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most studies early in the pandemic included all patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), not only those with RA, due to limited sample size. Many of these studies found that patients with SARDs were at higher risk of COVID-19 infection and severe outcomes, including hospitalization, hyperinflammation, mechanical ventilation, and death. Studies performed later were able to focus on RA and found similar associations, while also identifying RA-specific factors such as immunosuppressive medications, disease activity/severity, and interstitial lung disease as risk factors for severe COVID-19. After COVID-19 vaccination, the risks for COVID-19 infection and severity were reduced for patients with RA, but a gap between the general population persisted, and some patients with RA are susceptible to breakthrough infection after vaccination. Preexposure prophylaxis, effective treatments, and changes in viral variants have also contributed to improved COVID-19 outcomes throughout the pandemic. Emerging data suggest that patients with RA may be at risk for postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC).

SUMMARY

Although COVID-19 outcomes have improved over the pandemic for patients with RA, some experience poor acute and postacute outcomes after COVID-19. Clinicians and patients should remain vigilant about risk mitigation for infection and consider early treatment for RA patients with COVID-19. Future studies are needed to investigate clinical outcomes and mechanisms of PASC among patients with RA.

Unmet needs and perspectives in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A critical review

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovitis as the most common clinical manifestation, and interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) represents one of the most common and potentially severe extra-articular features. Our current understanding of the mechanisms and predictors of RA-ILD is limited despite the demonstration that an early identification of progressive fibrosing forms is crucial to provide timely treatment with antifibrotic therapies. While high resolution computed tomography is the gold standard technique for the diagnosis and follow-up of RA-ILD, it has been hypothesized that serum biomarkers (including novel and rare autoantibodies), new imaging techniques such as ultrasound of the lung, or the application of innovative radiologic algorithms may help towards predicting and detecting early forms of diseases. Further, while new treatments are becoming available for idiopathic and connective tissue disease-associated forms of lung fibrosis, the treatment of RA-ILD remains anecdotal and largely unexplored. We are convinced that a better understanding of the mechanisms connecting RA with ILD in a subgroup of patients as well as the creation of adequate diagnostic pathways will be mandatory steps for a more effective management of this clinically challenging entity.

Outcomes with and without outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with COVID-19 and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Some patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease and immunosuppression might still be at risk of severe COVID-19. The effect of outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments on COVID-19 outcomes among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease is unclear. We aimed to evaluate temporal trends, severe outcomes, and COVID-19 rebound among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease and COVID-19 who received outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment compared with those who did not receive outpatient treatment.

Methods

We did a retrospective cohort study at Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA. We included patients aged 18 years or older with a pre-existing systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, who had COVID-19 onset between Jan 23 and May 30, 2022. We identified COVID-19 by positive PCR or antigen test (index date defined as the date of first positive test) and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using diagnosis codes and immunomodulator prescription. Outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments were confirmed by medical record review. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as hospitalisation or death within 30 days after the index date. COVID-19 rebound was defined as documentation of a negative SARS-CoV-2 test after treatment followed by a newly positive test. The association of outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment versus no outpatient treatment with severe COVID-19 outcomes was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

Findings

Between Jan 23 and May 30, 2022, 704 patients were identified and included in our analysis (mean age 58·4 years [SD 15·9]; 536 [76%] were female and 168 [24%] were male, 590 [84%] were White and 39 [6%] were Black, and 347 [49%] had rheumatoid arthritis). Outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments increased in frequency over calendar time (p<0·0001). A total of 426 (61%) of 704 patients received outpatient treatment (307 [44%] with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, 105 [15%] with monoclonal antibodies, five [1%] with molnupiravir, three [<1%] with remdesivir, and six [1%] with combination treatment). There were nine (2·1%) hospitalisations or deaths among 426 patients who received outpatient treatment compared with 49 (17·6%) among 278 who did not receive outpatient treatment (odds ratio [adjusted for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and kidney function] 0·12, 95% CI 0·05-0·25). 25 (7·9%) of 318 patients who received oral outpatient treatment had documented COVID-19 rebound.

Interpretation

Outpatient treatment was associated with lower odds of severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with no outpatient treatment. These findings highlight the importance of outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease and COVID-19 and the need for further research on COVID-19 rebound.

Funding

None.

Acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease triggered by COVID-19: What is the best practice for treatment?

We present a case of 79-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) developed an acute exacerbation (AE) triggered by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The patient was unresponsive to a combination therapy of remdesivir, dexamethasone, and tocilizumab. Given that a recent multicenter cohort study reported ILD as a poor prognostic contributor in patients with RA and COVID-19, there may be potentially a certain number of patients with AE of RA-ILD triggered by COVID-19. This case highlights the need for a discussion how to treat these patients in a daily clinical practice.

Outcomes with and without outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with COVID-19 and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

To investigate temporal trends, severe outcomes, and rebound among systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) patients according to outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study investigating outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments among SARD patients at Mass General Brigham (23/Jan/2022-30/May/2022). We identified SARS-CoV-2 infection by positive PCR or antigen test (index date=first positive test) and SARDs using diagnosis codes and immunomodulator prescription. Outpatient treatments were confirmed by medical record review. The primary outcome was hospitalization or death within 30 days following the index date. COVID-19 rebound was defined as documentation of negative then newly-positive SARS-CoV-2 tests. The association of any vs. no outpatient treatment with hospitalization/death was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

We analyzed 704 SARD patients with COVID-19 (mean age 58.4 years, 76% female, 49% with rheumatoid arthritis). Treatment as outpatient increased over calendar time (p<0.001). A total of 426(61%) received outpatient treatment: 307(44%) with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 105(15%) with monoclonal antibodies, 5(0.7%) with molnupiravir, 3(0.4%) with outpatient remdesivir, and 6(0.9%) with combinations. There were 9/426 (2.1%) hospitalizations/deaths among those treated as outpatient compared to 49/278 (17.6%) among those with no outpatient treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.12, 0.05 to 0.25). 25/318 (8%) of patients who received oral outpatient treatment had documented COVID-19 rebound.

Conclusion

Outpatient treatment was strongly associated with lower odds of severe COVID-19 compared to no outpatient treatment. At least 8% of SARD patients experienced COVID-19 rebound. These findings highlight the importance of outpatient COVID-19 treatment for SARD patients and the need for further research on rebound.

KEY MESSAGES

What is already known on this topic?

Previous studies suggest that monoclonal antibodies are an effective outpatient treatment option for patients at high-risk of severe COVID-19, including those with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir are recently-authorized effective oral outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment options, but clinical trials were performed among the general population, mostly among unvaccinated and prior to Omicron viral variants.Oral outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments may result in COVID-19 rebound, characterized by newly-positive COVID-19 testing and recurrent symptoms, but no studies have investigated rebound prevalence among SARD patients.

What this study adds?

This is one of the first studies investigating outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments among SARD patients that includes oral options and quantifies the prevalence of COVID-19 rebound.Outpatient treatment was associated with 88% reduced odds of severe COVID-19 compared to no treatment.At least 8% of SARDs receiving oral outpatient treatment experienced COVID-19 rebound.

How this study might affect research practice or policy?

These results should encourage clinicians to prescribe and SARD patients to seek prompt outpatient COVID-19 treatment.This research provides an early estimate of the prevalence of COVID-19 rebound after oral outpatient treatment to quantify this risk to clinicians and SARD patients and encourage future research.